2020 to 2023 Research Priorities Advance INACSL Core Values

Healthcare Students' Experiences of Learner-Educator Cocreation of Virtual Simulations: A Phenomenographic Study

INTRODUCTION

Cocreating virtual simulations with learners during a course is an innovative approach to improving student preparation for real-world practice while helping simulationists meet learner needs, support authentic assessment, and maximize the impact of simulation-based learning. This study explores differences in healthcare students' experiences of learner-educator cocreation of virtual simulations (LECoVSs) using phenomenographic methods. Identifying differences in perceptions of LECoVSs enables educators to make evidence-informed decisions about engaging in simulation cocreation as a tool to maximize learning.

METHODS

Phenomenography focuses on identifying different ways that participants can experience the same phenomenon, in this case, LECoVSs. The setting was a collaborative interprofessional simulation assignment between navigation and nursing students. Participants completed a demographic survey then submitted reflective journals completed during the course and/or an open-ended survey. Data analysis occurred in iterative stages, from familiarization with the data to grouping and interpreting themes.

RESULTS

Nineteen open-ended surveys and 13 reflective journals from navigation and nursing students who completed the simulation assignment between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. Students experienced LECoVSs in 4 increasingly complex ways: (1) supporting consistent student progress, (2) amending course expectations, (3) sharing decision-making, and (4) fostering mutual growth.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulationists may leverage cocreation to improve student learning, access, empowerment, and professional growth. However, for students to achieve higher learning outcomes, educators need to clearly communicate the full potential of cocreation, how it can occur, and why it can support learning. This study's findings may be used as a framework for explaining simulation cocreation to students to maximize their learning.

Nursing students satisfaction and self-confidence with standardized patient palliative care simulation focusing on difficult conversations

OBJECTIVES

Lack of experience communicating with patients and families at the end of life are key concerns for nursing students. Palliative care simulation using standardized patients (SPs) focusing on difficult conversations may lead to increased self-confidence in providing palliative and end-of-life care in clinical practice. There is currently a paucity of research on SP palliative care simulations in undergraduate nursing education. The objective of this research was to assess 3rd year undergraduate nursing students' levels of satisfaction and self-confidence with palliative and end-of-life care simulations focusing on difficult conversations, as measured by the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SSSCLS) and the Simulation Design Scale (SDS).

METHODS

A descriptive post-intervention study. Four palliative care simulation days, consisting of 2 clinical scenarios, were conducted over 4 weeks. The first simulation was an outpatient palliative care clinic scenario, and the second was an inpatient hospital scenario. Nursing students enrolled in a 3rd year nursing palliative care elective (n = 51) at an Australian university were invited to participate. Students who attended simulation days were eligible to participate (n = 31). Immediately post-simulation, students were invited to complete the SSSCLS and the SDS. Fifty-seven surveys were completed (simulation 1, n = 28; simulation 2, n = 29). The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Results showed that students had high levels of self-confidence in developing palliative care and communication skills after both simulation experiences and high levels of satisfaction with the SP simulations.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The lack of published literature on palliative care and end-of-life SP simulation highlights the need to collect further evidence to support this as an innovative approach to teaching palliative care. SP palliative care simulation focusing on difficult conversations assists in developing students' communication skills and improves satisfaction and self-confidence with palliative and end-of-life care.

Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: A modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Immersive technology is becoming more widespread in simulation-based medical education with applications that both supplement and replace traditional teaching methods. There is a lack of validated measures that capture user experience to inform of the technology utility. We aimed to establish a consensus of items and domains that different simulation experts would include in a measure for immersive technology use.

METHODS

A 3-stage modified Delphi using online software was conducted to support the conceptual framework for the proposed measure. The first round was informed by prior work on immersive technology in simulation. In the first round, participants were asked to describe what we could measure in simulation-based education and technology. Thematic analysis generated key themes that were presented to the participants in the second round. Ranking of importance in round 2 was determined by mean rank scores. The final round was an online meeting for final consensus discussion and most important domains by experts were considered.

RESULTS

A total of 16 simulation experts participated in the study. A consensus was reached on the ideal measure in immersive technology simulation that would be a user questionnaire and domains of interest would be: what was learnt, the degree of immersion experienced, fidelity provided, debrief, psychological safety and patient safety. No consensus was reached with the barriers that this technology introduces in education.

CONCLUSIONS

There is varied opinion on what we should prioritise in measuring the experience in simulation practice. Importantly, this study identified key areas that aids our understanding on how we can measure new technology in educational settings. Synthesising these results in to a multidomain instrument requires a systematic approach to testing in future research.

Effect of Multiple-Patient Simulation on Baccalaureate Nursing Students' Anxiety and Self-confidence: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Multiple-patient simulation (MPS) allows nursing students to develop leadership skills. Limited research examining student outcomes following MPS exists.

PURPOSE

This pilot study investigated the impact of MPS on (1) anxiety with transition to practice, (2) anxiety with clinical decision-making, (3) self-confidence with clinical decision-making, and (4) perceptions about MPS as a learning strategy.

METHODS

Twenty-two senior baccalaureate nursing students participated in this 2-group mixed-methods study. Data were collected before and after a leadership course using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale, and a researcher-developed perceptions survey.

RESULTS

Self-confidence with clinical decision-making significantly increased for all participants regardless of group assignment. Anxiety and anxiety with clinical decision-making decreased without significant changes. No significant differences were found between groups. Qualitative findings yielded 3 themes: preparation for clinical practice, overcoming anxiety, and confidence.

CONCLUSION

Research investigating additional student outcomes after MPS with larger, more diverse samples is needed.

Adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the KidSIM Team Performance Scale

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional education offers students from different disciplines the opportunity to share learning experiences.

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a Spanish version of the KidSIM Team Performance Scale, thus providing a tool for assessing the team performance of undergraduate health professionals in our cultural context.

METHOD

Descriptive observational study consisting of two phases: a) translation and adaptation of the original instrument, b) validation of the Spanish version.

RESULTS

The Spanish version comprises 11 items and is linguistically and conceptually equivalent to the original scale. Factor analysis yielded a model comprising three factors: roles and leadership capacity, communication, and use of resources. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85), while inter-observer agreement was moderate (Cohen's kappa = 0.58). The RMSEA fit index was acceptable (0.0801 [0.0618-0.115]).

CONCLUSION

The Spanish version of the KidSIM Team Performance Scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing simulated teamwork among undergraduate health professionals.

Efficacy of a Simulation Program to Improve Clinical Judgment and Clinical Competence Among Graduate Nurses

AIM

This two-group feasibility study tested the efficacy of a four-scenario simulation program to improve clinical judgment and clinical competence among graduate nurses.

BACKGROUND

Clinical judgment and clinical competence are underdeveloped among new-to-practice nurses.

METHOD

Clinical judgment was compared between the intervention group (n = 17) and a control group (n = 26) in the practice setting at two time points.

RESULTS

The simulation program had a large effect on the intervention group's clinical judgment (η2 = .143) and clinical competence (η2 = .153). There were no statistically significant differences for each outcome at baseline as compared to the final scenario for the intervention group. There was no statistical significance between the intervention and control groups in clinical judgment in the practice setting at each measurement time.

CONCLUSION

Replication of the study with a randomized controlled trial and large sample size is warranted.