1
|
Anton CB, DeCesare NJ, Peterson C, Hayes TA, Bishop CJ. Climate, habitat interactions, and mule deer resource selection on winter landscapes. J Wildl Manage 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Colby B. Anton
- Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana Missoula MT 59812 USA
| | | | | | - Teagan A. Hayes
- Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana Missoula MT 59812 USA
| | - Chad J. Bishop
- Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana Missoula MT 59812 USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kunegel-Lion M, Neilson EW, Mansuy N, Goodsman DW. Habitat quality does not predict animal population abundance on frequently disturbed landscapes. Ecol Modell 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
3
|
Zimmerman SJ, Aldridge CL, Hooten MB, Oyler-McCance SJ. Scale-dependent influence of the sagebrush community on genetic connectivity of the sagebrush obligate Gunnison sage-grouse. Mol Ecol 2022; 31:3267-3285. [PMID: 35501946 PMCID: PMC9325045 DOI: 10.1111/mec.16470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Habitat fragmentation and degradation impacts an organism's ability to navigate the landscape, ultimately resulting in decreased gene flow and increased extinction risk. Understanding how landscape composition impacts gene flow (i.e., connectivity) and interacts with scale is essential to conservation decision‐making. We used a landscape genetics approach implementing a recently developed statistical model based on the generalized Wishart probability distribution to identify the primary landscape features affecting gene flow and estimate the degree to which each component influences connectivity for Gunnison sage‐grouse (Centrocercus minimus). We were interested in two spatial scales: among distinct populations rangewide and among leks (i.e., breeding grounds) within the largest population, Gunnison Basin. Populations and leks are nested within a landscape fragmented by rough terrain and anthropogenic features, although requisite sagebrush habitat is more contiguous within populations. Our best fit models for each scale confirm the importance of sagebrush habitat in connectivity, although the important sagebrush characteristics differ. For Gunnison Basin, taller shrubs and higher quality nesting habitat were the primary drivers of connectivity, while more sagebrush cover and less conifer cover facilitated connectivity rangewide. Our findings support previous assumptions that Gunnison sage‐grouse range contraction is largely the result of habitat loss and degradation. Importantly, we report direct estimates of resistance for landscape components that can be used to create resistance surfaces for prioritization of specific locations for conservation or management (i.e., habitat preservation, restoration, or development) or as we demonstrated, can be combined with simulation techniques to predict impacts to connectivity from potential management actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawna J Zimmerman
- U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Cameron L Aldridge
- U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Mevin B Hooten
- Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Sara J Oyler-McCance
- U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Donnell MS, Edmunds DR, Aldridge CL, Heinrichs JA, Coates PS, Prochazka BG, Hanser SE. Designing multi‐scale hierarchical monitoring frameworks for wildlife to support management: a sage‐grouse case study. Ecosphere 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S. O'Donnell
- U.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado 80526 USA
| | - David R. Edmunds
- Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University, in cooperation with the Fort Collins Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Colorado 80526 USA
| | - Cameron L. Aldridge
- Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability Colorado State University, in cooperation with the Fort Collins Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Colorado 80526 USA
| | - Julie A. Heinrichs
- Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University, in cooperation with the Fort Collins Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Colorado 80526 USA
| | - Peter S. Coates
- U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center Dixon California 95620 USA
| | - Brian G. Prochazka
- U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center Dixon California 95620 USA
| | - Steve E. Hanser
- U.S. Geological Survey Ecosystems Mission Area Reston VA 20192 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heinrichs JA, O'Donnell MS, Aldridge CL, Garman SL, Homer CG. Influences of potential oil and gas development and future climate on Sage-grouse declines and redistribution. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2019; 29:e01912. [PMID: 31310420 DOI: 10.1002/eap.1912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Multiple environmental stressors impact wildlife populations, but we often know little about their cumulative and combined influences on population outcomes. We generally know more about past effects than potential future impacts, and direct influences such as changes of habitat footprints than indirect, long-term responses in behavior, distribution, or abundance. Yet, an understanding of all these components is needed to plan for future landscapes that include human activities and wildlife. We developed a case study to assess how spatially explicit individual-based modeling could be used to evaluate future population outcomes of gradual landscape change from multiple stressors. For Greater Sage-grouse in southwest Wyoming, USA, we projected oil and gas development footprints and climate-induced vegetation changes 50 years into the future. Using a time-series of planned oil and gas development and predicted climate-induced changes in vegetation, we recalculated habitat selection maps to dynamically modify future habitat quantity, quality, and configuration. We simulated long-term Sage-grouse responses to habitat change by allowing individuals to adjust to shifts in habitat availability and quality. The use of spatially explicit individual-based modeling offered a useful means of evaluating delayed indirect impacts of landscape change on wildlife population outcomes. The inclusion of movement and demographic responses to oil and gas infrastructure resulted in substantive changes in distribution and abundance when cumulated over several decades and throughout the regional population. When combined, additive development and climate-induced vegetation changes reduced abundance by up to half of the original size. In our example, the consideration of only a single population stressor the final possible population size by as much as 50%. Multiple stressors and their cumulative impacts need to be broadly considered through space and time to avoid underestimating the impacts of multiple gradual changes and overestimating the ability of populations to withstand change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Heinrichs
- Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
- School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Cameron L Aldridge
- Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
| | - Steven L Garman
- U.S. Geological Survey, Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver, CO
- National Operations Center, Bureau of Land Management, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO
| | - Collin G Homer
- U.S. Geological Survey, Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS), SiouxFalls, SD
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0210643. [PMID: 30640947 PMCID: PMC6331132 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) was listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1990. We applied modern spatial conservation theory and models to evaluate several candidate critical habitat networks, and sought an efficient conservation solution that encompassed the highest value lands for spotted owl recovery rather than maximizing the total area of potential critical habitat. We created a map of relative habitat suitability, which served as input to the spatial conservation prioritization program Zonation. We used the spatially-explicit individual-based population model HexSim to estimate and compare simulated spotted owl population outcomes among a suite of candidate critical habitat networks that varied in size and spatial arrangement under alternative scenarios of future habitat suitability and barred owl (S. varia) effects. We evaluated simulated spotted owl population outcomes, including total population size, and extinction and quasi-extinction likelihoods for 108 combinations of candidate critical habitat networks by habitat change by barred owl scenarios, both range-wide and within 11 distinct portions of the owl's range. Barred owl encounter rates and the amount and suitability of habitat had substantial effects on simulated spotted owl populations. When barred owl encounter rates were high, changes in the amount and suitability of habitat had minimal impacts on population performance. Under lowered barred owl encounter rates, candidate critical habitat networks that included most existing high suitability habitat supported a high likelihood of long-term population persistence. Barred owls are currently the primary driving force behind poor population performance of NSOs; however, our models demonstrated that a sufficient area of high suitability habitat remains essential for recovery when effects of barred owls can be reduced. The modeling approach we employed is sufficiently flexible to incorporate new information about spotted owls as it becomes available and could likely be applied to conservation planning for other species.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ricca MA, Coates PS, Gustafson KB, Brussee BE, Chambers JC, Espinosa SP, Gardner SC, Lisius S, Ziegler P, Delehanty DJ, Casazza ML. A conservation planning tool for Greater Sage-grouse using indices of species distribution, resilience, and resistance. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2018; 28:878-896. [PMID: 29441692 DOI: 10.1002/eap.1690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Managers require quantitative yet tractable tools that identify areas for restoration yielding effective benefits for targeted wildlife species and the ecosystems they inhabit. As a contemporary example of high national significance for conservation, the persistence of Greater Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the Great Basin is compromised by strongly interacting stressors of conifer expansion, annual grass invasion, and more frequent wildfires occurring in sagebrush ecosystems. Associated restoration treatments to a sagebrush-dominated state are often costly and may yield relatively little ecological benefit to sage-grouse if implemented without estimating how Sage-grouse may respond to treatments, or do not consider underlying processes influencing sagebrush ecosystem resilience to disturbance and resistance to invasive species. Here, we describe example applications of a spatially explicit conservation planning tool (CPT) to inform prioritization of: (1) removal of conifers (i.e., pinyon-juniper); and (2) wildfire restoration aimed at improving habitat conditions for the Bi-State Distinct Population Segment of Sage-grouse along the California-Nevada state line. The CPT measures ecological benefits to sage-grouse for a given management action through a composite index comprised of resource selection functions and estimates of abundance and space use. For pinyon-juniper removal, we simulated changes in land-cover composition following the removal of sparse trees with intact understories, and ranked treatments on the basis of changes in ecological benefits per dollar-unit of cost. For wildfire restoration, we formulated a conditional model to simulate scenarios for land cover changes (e.g., sagebrush to annual grass) given estimated fire severity and underlying ecosystem processes influencing resilience to disturbance and resistance to invasion by annual grasses. For both applications, we compared CPT rankings to land cover changes along with sagebrush resistance and resilience metrics. Model results demonstrated how the CPT can be an important step in identifying management projects that yield the highest quantifiable benefit to Sage-grouse while avoiding costly misallocation of resources, and highlight the importance of considering changes in sage-grouse ecological response and factors influencing sagebrush ecosystem resilience to disturbance and resistance to invasion. This unique framework can be adopted to help inform other management questions aimed at improving habitat for other species across sagebrush and other ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Ricca
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, California, 95620, USA
| | - Peter S Coates
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, California, 95620, USA
| | - K Benjamin Gustafson
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, California, 95620, USA
| | - Brianne E Brussee
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, California, 95620, USA
| | - Jeanne C Chambers
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 920 Valley Road, Reno, Nevada, 89512, USA
| | - Shawn P Espinosa
- Nevada Department of Wildlife, 6980 Sierra Center Pkwy #120, Reno, Nevada, 89511, USA
| | - Scott C Gardner
- California Department of Fish and Wildlife, 1812 9th Street, Sacramento, California, 95814, USA
| | - Sherri Lisius
- Bureau of Land Management, 351 Pacu Lane, Suite 100, Bishop, California, 93514, USA
| | - Pilar Ziegler
- Bureau of Land Management, Carson City District, Sierra Front Field Office, 5665 Morgan Mill Road, Carson City, Nevada, 89701, USA
| | - David J Delehanty
- Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, 921 S. 8th Avenue, Pocatello, Idaho, 83209, USA
| | - Michael L Casazza
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, California, 95620, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schumaker NH, Brookes A. HexSim: a modeling environment for ecology and conservation. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY 2018; 33:197-211. [PMID: 29545713 PMCID: PMC5846496 DOI: 10.1007/s10980-017-0605-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Simulation models are increasingly used in both theoretical and applied studies to explore system responses to natural and anthropogenic forcing functions, develop defensible predictions of future conditions, challenge simplifying assumptions that facilitated past research, and to train students in scientific concepts and technology. Researcher's increased use of simulation models has created a demand for new platforms that balance performance, utility, and flexibility. OBJECTIVES We describe HexSim, a powerful new spatially-explicit, individual-based modeling framework that will have applications spanning diverse landscape settings, species, stressors, and disciplines (e.g. ecology, conservation, genetics, epidemiology). We begin with a model overview and follow-up with a discussion of key formative studies that influenced HexSim's development. We then describe specific model applications of relevance to readers of Landscape Ecology. Our goal is to introduce readers to this new modeling platform, and to provide examples characterizing its novelty and utility. CONCLUSIONS With this publication, we conclude a >10 year development effort, and assert that our HexSim model is mature, robust, extremely well tested, and ready for adoption by the research community. The HexSim model, documentation, worked examples, and other materials can be freely obtained from the website www.hexsim.net.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan H Schumaker
- US Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR, 97330. USA
| | - Allen Brookes
- US Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR, 97330. USA
| |
Collapse
|