[Susceptibility to measles and varicella in healthcare workers in a tertiary hospital in Catalonia]

Seroprevalence for measles among healthcare workers in Madrid, Spain

BACKGROUND

Immunity of healthcare workers (HCWs) against measles is a particular concern. They are more likely to contract it than the general population due to their occupational exposure which may cause a nosocomial outbreak.

AIM

To assess the measles immune status of HCWs at five Spanish university hospitals.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serologic testing (IgG) for measles by chemiluminescence indirect immunoassay (CLIA) was carried out prospectively and consecutively in HCWs from five university hospitals. All HCWs were classified into four epidemiological groups: vaccinated individuals, those with a history of measles disease, subjects with no history of measles or vaccination, and those who did not know whether they had measles or were vaccinated, and into five professional categories: physicians, nurses, nursing assistants, other clinical workers and non-clinical workers. A logistic regression model was constructed to identify the factors independently associated with immunity to measles.

RESULTS

The study group was composed of 2157 HCWs. 89% had protective antibodies against measles. Of the 238 non-immune HCWs, 199 (83.6%) had been vaccinated, compared with 1084 of the 1919 (56.5%) immune individuals (P<0.0001). The parameters significantly predictive of having protective antibodies against measles were: older age (P<0.0001), epidemiological status (P=0.0002, mainly past measles disease), and professional category (P=0.02, in particular nurses).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that HCWs, including those previously vaccinated, are currently at risk of measles and suggests that those with a natural history of infection are better protected. Therefore, knowledge and maintenance of immunity to measles are an essential part of infection control among HCWs.

Vaccination of healthcare workers: A review

Vaccine-preventable diseases are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. As new vaccines are proving to be effective and as the incidence of some infections decreases, vaccination practices are changing. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are particularly exposed to and play a role in nosocomial transmission, which makes them an important target group for vaccination. Most vaccine-preventable diseases still carry a significant risk of resurgence and have caused outbreaks in recent years. While many professional societies favor vaccination of HCWs as well as the general population, recommendations differ from country to country. In turn, vaccination coverage varies widely for each microorganism and for each country, making hospitals and clinics vulnerable to outbreaks. Vaccine mandates and non-mandatory strategies are the subject of ongoing research and controversies. Optimal approaches to increase coverage and turn the healthcare workforce into an efficient barrier against infectious diseases are still being debated.

Immunization of Health-Care Providers: Necessity and Public Health Policies

Health-care providers (HCPs) are at increased risk for exposure to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) in the workplace. The rationale for immunization of HCPs relies on the need to protect them and, indirectly, their patients from health-care-associated VPDs. Published evidence indicates significant immunity gaps for VPDs of HCPs globally. Deficits in knowledge and false perceptions about VPDs and vaccines are the most common barriers for vaccine uptake and may also influence communication about vaccines between HCPs and their patients. Most countries have immunization recommendations for HCPs; however, there are no universal policies and significant heterogeneity exists between countries in terms of vaccines, schedules, frame of implementation (recommendation or mandatory), and target categories of HCPs. Mandatory influenza immunization policies for HCPs have been implemented with high vaccine uptake rates. Stronger recommendations for HCP immunization and commitment at the level of the health-care facility are critical in order to achieve high vaccine coverage rates. Given the importance to health, mandatory immunization policies for VPDs that can cause serious morbidity and mortality to vulnerable patients should be considered.

[Immunity against measles among healthcare personnel at the University Hospital Frankfurt, 2003-2013]

BACKGROUND

Despite aiming for the elimination of measles by 2015, the current epidemiological situation in Germany shows that there is still insufficient vaccination coverage among the population. During the present pre-elimination period, nosocomial measles are gaining in importance.

AIM

The purpose of our study was to determine the immune status of measles among healthcare personnel and medical students at the University Hospital Frankfurt. Moreover, the knowledge of study participants regarding the WHO's goal of the elimination of measles and the general attitude towards vaccination recommendations were investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective study of measles seroprevalence was conducted among healthcare personnel and students at the University Hospital Frankfurt with an observation period of 11 years. In spring 2014, medical students were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire regarding vaccination status, knowledge of measles and acceptance of measles vaccination recommendations.

RESULTS

In total, 9,933 serologies were evaluated and 85.7% of the participants had sufficient immunity against measles. Significant changes in immunity to measles over time were not observed. However, a significant difference in the immunity rate of participants born before 1970 and those born after1970 was found. Participants born before 1970 significantly more often showed sufficient immunity against measles compared to those born later (96.4 vs. 83.3 %, p < 0.0001). Almost 20 % of the medical students were not aware of their measles vaccination status and merely 70.7 % indicated that they had received two measles vaccinations. Furthermore, only 45.4 % of the medical students were familiar with the WHO's goal of eliminating measles by 2015; however 95 % could be classified as vaccination-supporters on the basis of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the immunity rate of measles determined by serology within the study population did not reach the WHO goal of ≥ 95 %, and this gap was even greater in group of medical students. Despite the medical students' positive attitude towards vaccination guidelines, the awareness in this field awaits improvement.

Vaccination policies for healthcare workers in Europe

Health-care workers (HCWs) are at increased risk for acquisition of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) and vaccination is justified in order to protect them from occupational exposure and to prevent the spread of VPDs that pose a threat to susceptible patients. Review of European vaccination policies for HCWs revealed significant differences between countries in terms of recommended vaccines, implementation frame (mandatory or recommendation), target HCW groups and health-care settings. Further, the few published studies available identified indicate significant immunity gaps among HCWs against VPDs in Europe. In order to achieve higher vaccination coverage against VPDs stronger recommendations are needed. The issue of mandatory vaccination should be considered for diseases that can be transmitted to susceptible patients (influenza, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B, pertussis, varicella). The acceptance of vaccinations and of mandatory vaccinations by HCWs is a challenge and appears to be VPD-specific.