1
|
Eerkens AL, Brummel K, Vledder A, Paijens ST, Requesens M, Loiero D, van Rooij N, Plat A, Haan FJ, Klok P, Yigit R, Roelofsen T, de Lange NM, Klomp R, Church D, Ter Elst A, Wardenaar R, Spierings D, Foijer F, Koelzer VH, Bosse T, Bart J, Jalving M, Reyners AKL, de Bruyn M, Nijman HW. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in women with mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer: a phase I study. Nat Commun 2024; 15:7695. [PMID: 39227583 PMCID: PMC11372054 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52098-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has shown unprecedented activity in mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) colorectal cancers, but its effectiveness in MMRd endometrial cancer (EC) remains unknown. In this investigator-driven, phase I, feasibility study (NCT04262089), 10 women with MMRd EC of any grade, planned for primary surgery, received two cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) every three weeks. A pathologic response (primary objective) was observed in 5/10 patients, with 2 patients showing a major pathologic response. No patient achieved a complete pathologic response. A partial radiologic response (secondary objective) was observed in 3/10 patients, 5/10 patients had stable disease and 2/10 patients were non-evaluable on magnetic resonance imaging. All patients completed treatment without severe toxicity (exploratory objective). At median duration of follow-up of 22.5 months, two non-responders experienced disease recurrence. In-depth analysis of the loco-regional and systemic immune response (predefined exploratory objective) showed that monoclonal T cell expansion significantly correlated with treatment response. Tumour-draining lymph nodes displayed clonal overlap with intra-tumoural T cell expansion. All pre-specified endpoints, efficacy in terms of pathologic response as primary endpoint, radiologic response as secondary outcome and safety and tolerability as exploratory endpoint, were reached. Neoadjuvant ICB with pembrolizumab proved safe and induced pathologic, radiologic, and immunologic responses in MMRd EC, warranting further exploration of extended neoadjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneke L Eerkens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Brummel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annegé Vledder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sterre T Paijens
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Requesens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dominik Loiero
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nienke van Rooij
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annechien Plat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Floris-Jan Haan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Patty Klok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Refika Yigit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs Roelofsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rie Klomp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Treant, Emmen, The Netherlands
| | - David Church
- Welcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Arja Ter Elst
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - René Wardenaar
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Diana Spierings
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Foijer
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor Hendrik Koelzer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Bart
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mathilde Jalving
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna K L Reyners
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marco de Bruyn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noorian F, Abellana R, Zhang Y, Herreros A, Lancellotta V, Tagliaferri L, Sabater S, Torne A, Agusti-Camprubi E, Rovirosa A. Impact of Vaginal Dilator Use and 68 Gy EQD2 (α/β=3) Dose Constraint on Vaginal Complications in External Beam Irradiation Followed by Brachytherapy in Post-Operative Endometrial Cancer. J Pers Med 2024; 14:838. [PMID: 39202029 PMCID: PMC11355937 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of applying a 68 Gy EQD2(α/β=3) dose constraint to the most exposed 2 cm3 area of the vagina in post-operative endometrial cancer patients treated with vaginal-cuff brachytherapy after external beam irradiation and the impact of vaginal dilator use on late vaginal complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed 131 patients treated with vaginal-cuff brachytherapy after external beam irradiation. Group-1 (65 patients) received one fraction of 7 Gy, and Group-2 (66 patients) received one fraction of between 5.5 and 7.0 Gy after applying a 68 Gy EQD2(α/β=3) dose constraint. Vaginal-cuff relapse, late toxicity, clinical target volume, vaginal dilator use, D90, and EQD2(α/β=3) at 2 cm3 of the most exposed part of the clinical target volume were evaluated. Descriptive analysis, the chi-squared test, Student's t-test, and the Cox proportional and Kaplan-Meier models were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 60 months, the vaginal-cuff relapse rate was 1/131 (0.8%). Late vaginal complications appeared in 36/65 (55.4%) Group-1 patients and 17/66 (25.8%) Group-2 patients (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that belonging to Group-1 and vaginal dilator use of <9 months were independent prognostic factors of late vaginal complications with hazard ratios of 1.99 (p = 0.021) and 3.07 (p = 0.010), respectively. CONCLUSIONS A 68 Gy EQD2(α/β=3) constraint at 2 cm3 of clinical target volume and vaginal dilator use of ≥9 months were independent prognostic factors, having protective effects on late vaginal complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faegheh Noorian
- Fonaments Clínics Department, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (F.N.); (R.A.); (A.H.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa Abellana
- Fonaments Clínics Department, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (F.N.); (R.A.); (A.H.)
| | - Yaowen Zhang
- Cancer Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, No.7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou 450003, China;
| | - Antonio Herreros
- Fonaments Clínics Department, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (F.N.); (R.A.); (A.H.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Policlinic Universitario Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy; (V.L.); (L.T.)
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Policlinic Universitario Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy; (V.L.); (L.T.)
| | - Sebastià Sabater
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Albacete, 02006 Albacete, Spain;
| | - Aureli Torne
- Gynaecological Cancer Unit, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Eduard Agusti-Camprubi
- Radiological Protection Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Angeles Rovirosa
- Fonaments Clínics Department, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (F.N.); (R.A.); (A.H.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Gynaecological Cancer Unit, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
- Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Agustí Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xue X, Wang S, Li Y, Liu Z, Zhang J, Hu Z, Fan C, Zhang X, Li H, Li J. A comparative study of sampling methods in the detection of esophageal cancer-related microbiota. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12:e0038924. [PMID: 38980013 PMCID: PMC11302015 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00389-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) is a multifaceted disease. Our understanding of the involvement of esophageal microbiota in its pathogenesis and progression is limited, which is due to the lack of proper endoscopic sampling methods. Hereby, we conducted a comparative analysis of paired samples obtained through endoscopic brushing and cytosponge, aiming at assessing the feasibility of using cytosponge as a minimally invasive sampling way for studying esophageal microbiota. Our findings suggest that cytosponge sampling yielded significantly superior community richness and diversity compared to endoscopic brushing in both controls (non-cancerous) and EC individuals. The analysis of beta-diversity revealed distinct microbial community pattern in the genus diversity between the two sampling methods, underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate sampling methods to effectively characterize the esophageal microbiota. Specifically, Lactococcus and Serratia showed higher abundance in the samples collected by endoscopic brushing, while Alloprevotella and Leptotrichia were more enriched in the samples collected by cytosponge. These differences in dominant microbes were associated with metabolic pathways that particularly were related to host inflammation, such as pyruvate and glucose metabolisms. Notably, the phylogenetic levels of the microbiota indicated varied explanatory power for different detection purposes. This study underscores the substantial impact of sampling method selection on the acquisition of esophageal microbiota associated with the EC development, encompassing considerations of both abundance and diversity. This highlights the significance of selecting an appropriate sampling method for investigating the esophageal microbial status and studying the micro-environment in EC-related individuals. IMPORTANCE This study addresses a critical issue in esophageal cancer study by comparing two different sampling methods, endoscopic brushing and cytosponge, for investigating the esophageal microbiota. Our work highlights the suitability of the cytosponge technique as a minimally invasive sampling method for studying the esophageal microbiota and emphasizes the importance of selecting an appropriate sampling method to characterize the microbial community. Our findings have significant implications for advancing the understanding of the role of the esophageal microbiota in cancer development and will inform future research and clinical approaches in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Xue
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Helicobacter pylori & Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Cancer, Marshall Medical Research Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Siyu Wang
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yi Li
- Henan Key Laboratory of Helicobacter pylori & Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Cancer, Marshall Medical Research Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhenzhen Liu
- Department of Endoscopy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Endoscopy Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ziqing Hu
- Department of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana, USA
| | - Chengcheng Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Xiaojuan Zhang
- Scientific Research and Discipline Management Office, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Hongle Li
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weykamp F, Meixner E, Arians N, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Kim JY, Tawk B, Knoll M, Huber P, König L, Sander A, Mokry T, Meinzer C, Schlemmer HP, Jäkel O, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Daily AI-Based Treatment Adaptation under Weekly Offline MR Guidance in Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer 1: The AIM-C1 Trial. J Clin Med 2024; 13:957. [PMID: 38398270 PMCID: PMC10889253 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13040957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent chemotherapy, followed by brachytherapy (BT), offer a standard of care for patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Conventionally, large safety margins are required to compensate for organ movement, potentially increasing toxicity. Lately, daily high-quality cone beam CT (CBCT)-guided adaptive radiotherapy, aided by artificial intelligence (AI), became clinically available. Thus, online treatment plans can be adapted to the current position of the tumor and the adjacent organs at risk (OAR), while the patient is lying on the treatment couch. We sought to evaluate the potential of this new technology, including a weekly shuttle-based 3T-MRI scan in various treatment positions for tumor evaluation and for decreasing treatment-related side effects. (2) Methods: This is a prospective one-armed phase-II trial consisting of 40 patients with cervical carcinoma (FIGO IB-IIIC1) with an age ≥ 18 years and a Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70%. EBRT (45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions with 55.0-58.8 Gy simultaneous integrated boosts to lymph node metastases) will be accompanied by weekly shuttle-based MRIs. Concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy will be given, followed by 28 Gy of BT (four fractions). The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of overall early bowel and bladder toxicity CTCAE grade 2 or higher (CTCAE v5.0). Secondary outcomes include clinical feasibility, quality of life, and imaging-based response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ji-Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bouchra Tawk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Huber
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Sander
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Theresa Mokry
- Department of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clara Meinzer
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (J.H.-R.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kanani A, Fatemi-Ardakani A, Owrangi AM, Yazdi M, Baghbani H, Mosleh-Shirazi MA. Quantification of Artifacts and Image Distortions in 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Images of a Commercial Multi-Channel Vaginal Cylinder Brachytherapy Applicator Set. J Biomed Phys Eng 2023; 13:523-534. [PMID: 38148963 PMCID: PMC10749412 DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2309-1665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Background The BEBIG Portio multi-channel applicator provides better target dose coverage and sparing organs-at-risk compared to a single-channel cylinder. However, artifacts and distortions of Portio in magnetic resonance images (MRI) have not yet been reported. Objective We aimed to quantify the artifacts and distortions in its 1.5-Tesla MR images before clinical use. Material and Methods In this experimental study, we employed a gelatin-filled phantom to conduct our measurements. T2-weighted (T2W) images were examined for artifacts and distortions. Computed tomography (CT) images were used as a reference to assess image distortions. Artifact severity was measured by recording the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) image pixel values at various positions along the length of the applicator/channels. CT and MRI-based applicator reconstruction accuracy were then compared, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast were also determined for the applicator images. Results The applicator distortion level for the Portio applicator was less than the image spatial resolution (0.5±0.5 pixels). The average FWHM for the tandem applicator images was 5.23±0.39 mm, while it was 3.21±0.37 mm for all channels (compared to their actual diameters of 5.0 mm and 3.0 mm, respectively). The average applicator reconstruction difference between CT and MR images was 0.75±0.30 mm overall source dwell positions. The image SNR and contrast were both acceptable. Conclusion These findings indicate that the Portio applicator has a satisfactory low level of artifacts and image distortions in 1.5-Tesla, T2W images. It may, therefore, be a promising option for MRI-guided multi-channel vaginal brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abolfazl Kanani
- Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ali Fatemi-Ardakani
- Department of Physics, Jackson State University (JSU), Jackson, Mississippi, USA
- SpinTecx, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Community Health Systems (CHS) Cancer Network, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Amir M Owrangi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Rd, EC2.242, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - Mehran Yazdi
- Signal and Image Processing Lab (SIPL), School of Electrical and Computer Eng, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hadi Baghbani
- Department of Radiology, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi
- Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lindfors A, Järvholm S, Dahm-Kähler P. Health-related quality of life after robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: a prospective longitudinal one-year follow-up study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:515-525. [PMID: 36694036 PMCID: PMC10293409 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-06917-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to explore how patients treated for endometrial cancer (EC) with robotic surgery are affected in symptoms of anxiety and depression and HRQoL in the long term. METHODS Women scheduled for primary robotic surgery for EC were included (n = 64), in this single-center study. Socioeconomic variables were obtained at baseline. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancers Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), its module for EC (EN24), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9) were followed prospectively from baseline to 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS The number of patients scoring above the clinical threshold for anxiety decreased from 17 (27.0%) at baseline to 4 (7.0%) at 2 weeks (p = 0.012). Depressive symptoms were reported in 20% of patients at baseline and did not change significantly during the one-year follow-up (p = 0.58). A significant decrease in Global health status was seen at 2 weeks (from 69.8 to 62.7; p = 0.048), with return to baseline levels after 3 months (68.5; p = 0.32) and stable at 1 year. Unemployment, low income, and adjuvant therapy correlated with lower Global health status at 3 months. CONCLUSION The significant proportion of patients with anxiety symptoms preoperatively reduced prompt after surgery, while the proportion with depression remained constant, indicating that the primary treatment has no long-term negative effect on patients' mental health. At 3 months, there is no obvious remaining negative impact on patients' HRQoL, and these results are consistent after 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lindfors
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Department of Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Stina Järvholm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Dahm-Kähler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Suvaal I, Kirchheiner K, Nout RA, Sturdza AE, Van Limbergen E, Lindegaard JC, Putter H, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Chargari C, Tanderup K, Pötter R, Creutzberg CL, Ter Kuile MM. Vaginal changes, sexual functioning and distress of women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated in the EMBRACE vaginal morbidity substudy. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:123-132. [PMID: 36682090 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The EMBRACE-vaginal morbidity substudy prospectively evaluated physician-assessed vaginal changes and patient-reported-outcomes (PRO) on vaginal and sexual functioning problems and distress in the first 2-years after image-guided radio(chemo)therapy and brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS Eligible patients had stage IB1-IIIB cervical cancer with ≤5 mm vaginal involvement. Assessment of vaginal changes was graded using CTCAE. PRO were assessed using validated Quality-of-Life and sexual questionnaires. Statistical analysis included Generalized-Linear-Mixed-Models and Spearman's rho-correlation coefficients. RESULTS 113 eligible patients were included. Mostly mild (grade 1) vaginal changes were reported over time in about 20% (range 11-37%). At 2-years, 47% was not sexually active. Approximately 50% of the sexually active women reported any vaginal and sexual functioning problems and distress over time; more substantial vaginal and sexual problems and distress were reported by up to 14%, 20% and 8%, respectively. Physician-assessed vaginal changes and PRO sexual satisfaction differed significantly (p ≤ .05) between baseline and first follow-up, without further significant changes over time. No or only small associations between physician-assessed vaginal changes and PRO vaginal functioning problems and sexual distress were found. CONCLUSIONS Mild vaginal changes were reported after image-guided radio(chemo)therapy and brachytherapy, potentially due to the combination of tumors with limited vaginal involvement, EMBRACE-specific treatment optimization and rehabilitation recommendations. Although vaginal and sexual functioning problems and sexual distress were frequently reported, the rate of substantial problems and distress was low. The lack of association between vaginal changes, vaginal functioning problems and sexual distress shows that sexual functioning is more complex than vaginal morbidity alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Suvaal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Zone K6-T, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - K Kirchheiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - R A Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A E Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - E Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J C Lindegaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Paris, France
| | - K Tanderup
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - R Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M M Ter Kuile
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Zone K6-T, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Datta A, Ram TS, Karuppusami R, Thomas A, Sebastian A, Thomas V, Chandy RG, Peedicayil A. A longitudinal study of sexual health and quality of life in endometrial carcinoma survivors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2022-004069. [PMID: 36737099 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess sexual health and quality of life (QoL) in endometrial cancer survivors and the factors influencing these variables. METHODS A mixed method design comprising quantitative (cohort design) and qualitative (face-to-face interviews) aspects was chosen. A total of 132 patients who underwent surgery alone, surgery followed by adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy, or surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiation were included. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) questionnaires were used to assess the participants' sexual health and QoL at 6 months and 1 year post-treatment. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the factors associated with general and sexual well-being. RESULTS At 1 year, 89% of the participants still had low sexual function scores. Survivors over 50 years (OR 284.7, 95% CI 13 to 364, p<0.001) and educated below graduate level (OR 26.8, 95% CI 2 to 370, p=0.014) had low sexual function scores. Patients who had surgery alone had better QoL than those who received adjuvant radiation. Women who had surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation had the lowest QoL scores (OR 6.4, 95% CI 2.1 to 19.5, p=0.001). All scores improved with time. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the high prevalence of low sexual function and poor QoL in endometrial cancer survivors. There was a communication gap between the women and their partners as well as their healthcare providers. This study highlights the need for discussion about the survivors' sexual well-being and QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amrita Datta
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Thomas S Ram
- Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Reka Karuppusami
- Biostatistics, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Anitha Thomas
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ajit Sebastian
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Vinotha Thomas
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Rachel George Chandy
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Abraham Peedicayil
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital Vellore, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India .,Gynecologic Oncology, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat, Oman
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yoder AK, Lakomy DS, Wu J, Andring LM, Fellman B, Colbert LE, Jhingran A, Klopp AH, Soliman P, Peterson SK, Lin LL. Impact of Treatment Modality on Quality of Life Among Uterine Cancer Survivors. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e215-e226. [PMID: 36494250 PMCID: PMC9904419 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Our understanding of the impact of adjuvant therapy on longitudinal quality of life (QoL) following surgery for patients with uterine cancer is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare QoL in patients who have undergone surgery with or without radiation therapy for uterine cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a cross-sectional cohort study that examined women treated for uterine cancer at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2006 to 2017. Participants included those who underwent hysterectomy/bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy alone, with brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). A non-cancer cohort of women who underwent a hysterectomy/bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy for benign indications was also identified (non-CA). To compare QoL we used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endometrial survey (FACT-En), a validated survey used to assess QoL. The survey has five subscales: physical, social, emotional, functional and an endometrial cancer-specific subscale. Cohorts were compared using ANOVA tests. RESULTS In total, 309 women responded to the questionnaire (hysterectomy/bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy 64, brachytherapy 77, EBRT 96, non-CA 72). The median time from surgery to survey completion was 6.7 years. The mean total FACT-En score for the entire cohort was 144 [standard deviation 22]. Overall QoL was different between cohorts, with the EBRT cohort reporting the lowest QoL (mean 139.4 [21.6]) and the brachytherapy cohort the highest (150.6 [18.2], P = 0.006). Among patients who had undergone cancer treatment, the EBRT cohort reported the worst endometrial-specific QoL (53.5 [8.6]), while again the brachytherapy group reported the highest score (57.5 [6.1], P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS QoL differences in women who have undergone different treatments for uterine cancer may persist years after treatment. In women with endometrial cancer who require adjuvant therapy, brachytherapy does not appear to have any long-term detriments on QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Yoder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - D S Lakomy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - L M Andring
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - B Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - L E Colbert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A H Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - L L Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abu-Rustum N, Yashar C, Arend R, Barber E, Bradley K, Brooks R, Campos SM, Chino J, Chon HS, Chu C, Crispens MA, Damast S, Fisher CM, Frederick P, Gaffney DK, Giuntoli R, Han E, Holmes J, Howitt BE, Lea J, Mariani A, Mutch D, Nagel C, Nekhlyudov L, Podoll M, Salani R, Schorge J, Siedel J, Sisodia R, Soliman P, Ueda S, Urban R, Wethington SL, Wyse E, Zanotti K, McMillian NR, Aggarwal S. Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:181-209. [PMID: 36791750 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 146.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (also known as endometrial cancer, or more broadly as uterine cancer or carcinoma of the uterine corpus) is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in the United States. It is estimated that 65,950 new uterine cancer cases will have occurred in 2022, with 12,550 deaths resulting from the disease. Endometrial carcinoma includes pure endometrioid cancer and carcinomas with high-risk endometrial histology (including uterine serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma [also known as malignant mixed Müllerian tumor], and undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma). Stromal or mesenchymal sarcomas are uncommon subtypes accounting for approximately 3% of all uterine cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms focuses on the diagnosis, staging, and management of pure endometrioid carcinoma. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms is available online at NCCN.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Emma Barber
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | - Susana M Campos
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jordan Holmes
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | - Jayanthi Lea
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | - David Mutch
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Christa Nagel
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Larissa Nekhlyudov
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | | | | | - John Schorge
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | - Rachel Sisodia
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | | | - Stefanie Ueda
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Kristine Zanotti
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Otsuka I. Therapeutic Benefit of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Node-Negative Uterine-Confined Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma: Omission of Adjuvant Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184516. [PMID: 36139675 PMCID: PMC9497184 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological tract malignancy in developed countries. Extrauterine disease, in particular lymph node metastasis, is an important prognostic factor. Nevertheless, pelvic lymphadenectomy is not considered to have a therapeutic benefit, as it did not improve survival in randomized studies. However, lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic benefit if adjuvant therapy can be omitted without decreasing oncological outcomes, as the long-term quality of life is maintained by avoiding morbidities associated with adjuvant therapy. In intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, adjuvant therapy may be safely omitted without decreasing long-term survival by open surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy when patients are node-negative. Systematic lymphadenectomy may remove undetectable low-volume lymph node metastasis in both pelvic and para-aortic regions, and open surgery may reduce vaginal recurrence even without vaginal brachytherapy. However, lymphadenectomy may not improve survival in elderly patients and patients with p53-mutant tumors. Abstract Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological tract malignancy in developed countries, and its incidence has been increasing globally with rising obesity rates and longer life expectancy. In endometrial cancer, extrauterine disease, in particular lymph node metastasis, is an important prognostic factor. Nevertheless, pelvic lymphadenectomy is not considered to have a therapeutic benefit, as it did not improve survival in randomized studies. However, lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic benefit if adjuvant therapy can be omitted without decreasing oncological outcomes, as the long-term quality of life is maintained by avoiding morbidities associated with adjuvant therapy. In intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, adjuvant therapy may be safely omitted without decreasing long-term survival by open surgery including systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy when patients are node-negative. Systematic lymphadenectomy may remove undetectable low-volume lymph node metastasis in both pelvic and para-aortic regions, and open surgery may reduce vaginal recurrence even without vaginal brachytherapy. However, lymphadenectomy may not improve survival in elderly patients and patients with p53-mutant tumors. In this review, I discuss the characteristics of lymph node metastasis, the methods of lymph node assessment, and the therapeutic benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isao Otsuka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lakomy DS, Yoder AK, Wu J, Hernandez M, Ayoola-Adeola M, Jhingran A, Klopp AH, Soliman P, Peterson SK, Lin LL. Impact of treatment modality on pelvic floor dysfunction among uterine cancer survivors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:ijgc-2022-003417. [PMID: 35680139 PMCID: PMC9732149 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common adverse effect of uterine cancer treatment. In this study we compared patient-reported outcomes regarding pelvic floor dysfunction among uterine cancer survivors after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, surgery and brachytherapy, or surgery and external beam radiotherapy with or without brachytherapy versus women who had a hysterectomy for benign indications. METHODS We used the validated 20-item Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory to assess lower urinary distress, colorectal distress, and pelvic organ prolapse dysfunction in each treatment group. Pelvic floor dysfunction-related quality of life in these domains was compared across treatment modalities using the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7. Treatment type, body mass index, comorbidities, and number of vaginal births were obtained from medical records. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was used to assess the association of treatment regimens and covariates relative to the non-cancer cohort. RESULTS A total of 309 surveys were analyzed. The median age of the patients at surgery was 58 years (range 20-87) and the median age at survey completion was 66 years (range 34-92). Most participants reported experiencing at least one symptom of pelvic floor dysfunction (76% by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-2). The type of treatment had no effect on overall pelvic floor dysfunction on multivariate analysis (all p>0.05). Worse urinary-related symptoms were associated with higher body mass index at surgery (OR 1.41), higher age at time of survey (OR 1.07), and higher numbers of vaginal births (OR 1.43) (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Overall, pelvic floor dysfunction did not significantly vary by treatment modality. Our findings suggest complex interactions among age, body mass index, and parity as to how uterine cancer treatment affects pelvic floor quality of life, which should be considered in the choice of treatment strategy and patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S. Lakomy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH
| | - Alison K. Yoder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juliana Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mike Hernandez
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martins Ayoola-Adeola
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ann H. Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pamela Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lilie L. Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Leung E, Gladwish AP, Davidson M, Taggar A, Velker V, Barnes E, Mendez L, Donovan E, Gien LT, Covens A, Vicus D, Kupets R, MacKay H, Han K, Cheung P, Zhang L, Loblaw A, D’Souza DP. Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Toxic Effects Among Patients With Cancers of the Uterus Treated With Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy: The SPARTACUS Phase 1/2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1-9. [PMID: 35420695 PMCID: PMC9011178 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Adjuvant radiation plays an important role in reducing locoregional recurrence in patients with uterine cancer. Although hypofractionated radiotherapy may benefit health care systems and the global community while decreasing treatment burden for patients traveling for daily radiotherapy, it has not been studied prospectively nor in randomized trials for treatment of uterine cancers, and the associated toxic effects and patient quality of life are unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate acute genitourinary and bowel toxic effects and patient-reported outcomes following stereotactic hypofractionated adjuvant radiation to the pelvis for treatment of uterine cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Cancers of the Uterus (SPARTACUS) phase 1/2 nonrandomized controlled trial of patients accrued between May 2019 and August 2021 was conducted as a multicenter trial at 2 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. In total, 61 patients with uterine cancer stages I through III after surgery entered the study. INTERVENTIONS Stereotactic adjuvant pelvic radiation to a dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions administered every other day or once weekly. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Assessments of toxic effects and patient-reported quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and endometrial EN24) were collected at baseline, fractions 3 and 5, and at 6 weeks and 3 months of follow-up. Descriptive analysis was conducted, calculating means, SDs, medians, IQRs, and ranges for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Univariate generalized linear mixed models were generated for repeated measurements on the quality-of-life scales. RESULTS A total of 61 patients were enrolled (median age, 66 years; range, 51-88 years). Tumor histologic results included 39 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 15 serous or clear cell, 3 carcinosarcoma, and 4 dedifferentiated. Sixteen patients received sequential chemotherapy, and 9 received additional vault brachytherapy. Median follow-up was 9 months (IQR, 3-15 months). Of 61 patients, worst acute gastrointestinal tract toxic effects of grade 1 were observed in 33 patients (54%) and of grade 2 in 8 patients (13%). For genitourinary worst toxic effects, grade 1 was observed in 25 patients (41%) and grade 2 in 2 patients (3%). One patient (1.6%) had an acute grade 3 gastrointestinal tract toxic effect of diarrhea at fraction 5 that resolved at follow-up. Only patient-reported diarrhea scores were both clinically (scores ≥10) and statistically significantly worse at fraction 5 (mean [SD] score, 35.76 [26.34]) compared with baseline (mean [SD] score, 6.56 [13.36]; P < .001), but this symptom improved at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this phase 1/2 nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that stereotactic hypofractionated radiation was well tolerated at short-term follow-up for treatment of uterine cancer. Longer follow-up and future randomized studies are needed to further evaluate this treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04866394.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Leung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam P. Gladwish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Victoria Hospital, University of Toronto, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amandeep Taggar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vikram Velker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lucas Mendez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elysia Donovan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian T. Gien
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helen MacKay
- Divison of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathy Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David P. D’Souza
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhou Y, Rassy E, Coutte A, Achkar S, Espenel S, Genestie C, Pautier P, Morice P, Gouy S, Chargari C. Current Standards in the Management of Early and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Update on the Benefit of Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2449. [PMID: 35626051 PMCID: PMC9139662 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, cervical cancers continue to be one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. The primary treatment of patients with early-stage disease includes surgery or radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. The main challenge in treating these patients is to maintain a curative approach and limit treatment-related morbidity. Traditionally, inoperable patients are treated with radiation therapy solely and operable patients undergo upfront surgery followed by adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy in cases with poor histopathological prognostic features. Patients with locally advanced cervical cancers are treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by an image-guided brachytherapy boost. In these patients, the main pattern of failure is distant relapse, encouraging intensification of systemic treatments to improve disease control. Ongoing trials are evaluating immunotherapy in locally advanced tumours following its encouraging efficacy reported in the recurrent and metastatic settings. In this article, clinical evidence of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in cervical cancer patients is reviewed, with a focus on potential strategies to improve patients' outcome and minimize treatment-related morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuedan Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 80000 Amiens-Picardie, France; (Y.Z.); (A.C.)
| | - Elie Rassy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 94800 Villejuif, France; (E.R.); (P.P.)
| | - Alexandre Coutte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 80000 Amiens-Picardie, France; (Y.Z.); (A.C.)
| | - Samir Achkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 94800 Villejuif, France; (S.A.); (S.E.)
| | - Sophie Espenel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 94800 Villejuif, France; (S.A.); (S.E.)
| | - Catherine Genestie
- Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, 94800 Villejuif, France;
| | - Patricia Pautier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 94800 Villejuif, France; (E.R.); (P.P.)
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, 94800 Villejuif, France; (P.M.); (S.G.)
| | - Sébastien Gouy
- Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, 94800 Villejuif, France; (P.M.); (S.G.)
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 94800 Villejuif, France; (S.A.); (S.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ranjan N, Chopra S, Mangaj A, Rane P, Charnalia M, Kannan S, Dora T, Engineer R, Mahantshetty U, Gurram L, Mittal P, Ghosh J, Maheshwari A, Shylasree TS, Gupta S, Shrivastava SK. Months and Severity Score (MOSES) in a Phase III trial (PARCER): A new comprehensive method for reporting adverse events in oncology clinical trials. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 47:101390. [PMID: 35480072 PMCID: PMC9035686 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse event reporting in oncology trials lacks temporal description. We propose a toxicity summarizing method that incorporates time. METHODS Patients recruited in a phase III trial (NCT01279135) that compared three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for late toxicity in cervical cancer were included. Adverse events were reported using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 and quality of life (QOL) with EORTC QLQ-C30 and CX24. A total of six symptoms with a related QOL question (diarrhoea, abdominal pain, anorexia, urinary incontinence, frequency and fatigue) were included. Month and severity score [MOSES= ∑ (CTCAE grade x proportionate time)] was calculated. Cumulative-MOSES (C-MOSES) was calculated by summating these 6 individual MOSES. QoL was categorized as "substantially symptomatic" or "not". Receiver operator curve analysis was performed to determine the MOSES cut off that predicts for substantial QOL symptoms. CTCAE and MOSES were tested for accurately categorizing QOL impact. FINDINGS In the construction dataset, 201/300 patients had symptoms. MOSES > 0.20 had higher accuracy than CTCAE for predicting impact on QOL related to diarrhoea (85% vs. 69%), anorexia (61% vs 51%), abdominal pain (71% vs. 57%), urinary incontinence (72% vs. 61%) and frequency (62% vs. 59%). C-MOSES > 0·70 correlated with reduction in role functioning and global QOL. While no difference was seen in CTCAE grade ≥1 Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity between 3DCRT or IMRT arm, 3DCRT had higher C-MOSES than IMRT (HR=0.64;95% CI 0.41-0.99, p = 0.04). INTERPRETATION MOSES has higher accuracy than CTCAE in categorizing symptom specific and functional QOL. These results require further external validation. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilesh Ranjan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Corresponding author.
| | - Akshay Mangaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pallavi Rane
- Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mayuri Charnalia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sadhana Kannan
- Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Tapas Dora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Umesh Mahantshetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Lavanya Gurram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Prachi Mittal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jaya Ghosh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amita Maheshwari
- Department of Gynae Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - TS Shylasree
- Department of Gynae Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - SK Shrivastava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van den Heerik ASVM, Horeweg N, Creutzberg CL, Nout RA. Vaginal brachytherapy management of stage I and II endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:304-310. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant radiotherapy is an important component of post-operative therapy for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. In the past decades, many trials have been conducted to determine the optimal adjuvant treatment strategy, pelvic external beam radiotherapy or vaginal brachytherapy. As a result, vaginal brachytherapy became the treatment of choice for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer at high-intermediate risk, based on clinicopathological risk factors. Vaginal brachytherapy maximizes local control and has only mild side effects with limited impact on quality of life, in comparison with pelvic external beam radiotherapy. The most frequently used treatment schedule is the one which was used in the PORTEC-2 trial (21 Gy in three fractions specified at 5 mm depth) and, whenever available, image-guided brachytherapy should be used. However, the most convenient and effective treatment schedule remains to be established. More recently, the discovery and integration of four molecular classes in the risk assessment of endometrial cancer patients has created new opportunities to prevent over- and undertreatment. The 2021 endometrial cancer guideline of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) now proposes an integrated risk stratification, in which both clinicopathologic and molecular factors are combined, to direct adjuvant therapy. This rationale is now investigated in multiple prospective trials. This review provides an overview of the rationale and currently recommended and new strategies for vaginal brachytherapy in patients with stage I and II endometrial cancer.
Collapse
|
17
|
Chopra S, Ranjan N, Mittal P. Postoperative adjuvant radiation for cervix cancer: reflections on the evidence and a peep into the future. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:225-230. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Early stage cervical cancer, stages IB1–2 and IIA1, can be treated with (chemo)radiation and brachytherapy or radical hysterectomy with or without further adjuvant (chemo)radiation. In a carefully selected cohort for surgery, traditionally a small proportion of patients would need adjuvant (chemo)radiation so that the therapeutic ratio is maximized. However, advances in radiation technology, specifically intensity modulated radiotherapy, have led to a reduction in treatment related adverse events. Also, recent developments in risk stratification suggest using a lower threshold to offer adjuvant treatment to minimize pelvic relapse. These developments together present opportunities of not only re-examining the therapeutic ratio but also of further evolving postoperative risk stratification. This review article summarizes the current evidence on adjuvant treatment strategies and summarizes the key areas where research should be focused.
Collapse
|
18
|
Demogeot N, Salleron J, Beckendorf V, Peiffert D, Levitchi M, Charra-Brunaud C, Renard S. Impact of external beam pelvic radiotherapy of endometrial carcinoma: A focus on chronic digestive toxicity. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:570-576. [PMID: 35172947 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard treatment for endometrial cancer is surgery, although depending on the risk factors, adjuvant radiation therapy may also be given. It is proposed for high-risk carcinomas for which an improvement in progression-free survival though not overall survival has been shown. However, despite the development of radiotherapy treatments with intensity modulation and image guidance, adjuvant radiation therapy remains toxic to the digestive system. We aimed to investigate the incidence of digestive toxicity and the presence of any predictive factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial carcinoma at the Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine and centre hospitalier Émile-Durkheim between January 2010 and October 2016 and analyzed to identify factors associated with chronic digestive toxicity. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-nine patients received a total dose of 50Gy fractionated into 25 sessions, five per week for five weeks. The median follow-up after irradiation completion was 38 months. The incidence of gastrointestinal and rectal toxicity in all patients treated with pelvic irradiation for endometrial carcinoma was 11.1% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 5.4-19%) for grade 3-4 and 25.6% (95%CI: 17.0-34.9%) for grade 2-4. No factor was found to be significantly predictive of chronic digestive toxicity. At five years, the overall survival was 74.3%, (95%CI: 65.3-81.4%), progression-free survival was 69.6% (95%CI: 60.1-77.3%) and incidence of pelvic recurrence was 7.9% (95%CI: 3.8-13.9%). CONCLUSION Our results confirmed that pelvic radiotherapy can induce a relatively high rate of digestive toxicity but failed to identify relevant factors able to predict it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Demogeot
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30 519, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| | - J Salleron
- Département de biostatistiques, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - V Beckendorf
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30 519, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - D Peiffert
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30 519, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - M Levitchi
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Henri-Becquerel, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - C Charra-Brunaud
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30 519, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - S Renard
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30 519, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mittal P, Chopra S, Charnalia M, Dora T, Engineer R, Mulani J, Scaria L, Prajapati K, Kannan S, Gurram L, Mahantshetty U, Gupta S, Shrivastava SK. Patterns of relapse after adjuvant (chemo)radiation for cervical cancer in a phase III clinical trial (PARCER): an evaluation of updated NRG Oncology /RTOG target delineation guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:369-378. [PMID: 35157993 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIM NRG Oncology/RTOG recently published updated contouring guidelines for intensity modulated radiotherapy in postoperative treatment for endometrial and cervical cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the implications of newly published guidelines. METHODS Patients (n = 300) recruited in Phase III RCT of adjuvant (chemo)RT for cervical cancer (NCT01279135) were included for understanding patterns of relapse. For those with pelvic relapse, RT structure sets, treatment plans and diagnostic images at relapse were imported on the treatment planning system. Rigid registration was performed with treatment planning images that contained the delineated PTV and radiation dose information. Gross tumor volume at time of relapse was delineated on the diagnostic scans and superimposed on the radiotherapy treatment scans. The site of pelvic relapse was categorized as "within field of old RTOG/PARCER target delineation guidelines" or/and "within field of new NRG/RTOG guidelines" and proportions of recurrences contained within the two guidelines were compared. p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Additionally, IMRT treatment plans were generated based on the new guidelines for a limited set of patients to see if these new guidelines increased the organ at risk doses. RESULTS Most common form of relapse was distant metastasis (15%). Pelvic relapse rate in our study was 8%. Overall 9/19 relapses were encompassed in the old RTOG/PARCER contouring guidelines while 12/19 were encompassed within the new RTOG 2021 contouring guidelines. This corresponded to a further 1% reduction in local relapses (p 0.007). Dose to rectum was marginally increased with the new contouring, with no difference in other organs at risk. Salvage treatment was offered in 25/60 patients who relapsed. In patients who received local treatment after relapse had a mean survival after relapse of 27.2 months compared to 8 months who received supportive care alone. CONCLUSION Our study supports the use of newly published NRG/RTOG contouring guidelines in patients with cervical cancer who have undergone hysterectomy. Further data is needed to ascertain if anterior extension of the CTV is needed as in PARCER trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prachi Mittal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Mayuri Charnalia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Tapas Dora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Sangrur, Punjab, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jaahid Mulani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Libin Scaria
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kunal Prajapati
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sadhana Kannan
- Epidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, Advanced Centre for Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Lavanya Gurram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Umesh Mahantshetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment and Education in cancer, Tata Memorial Centre (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shyam Kishore Shrivastava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Forsse D, Barbero ML, Werner HMJ, Woie K, Nordskar N, Berge Nilsen E, Ellstrøm Engh M, Vistad I, Rege A, Sævik-Lode M, Andreasen S, Haldorsen IS, Trovik J, Krakstad C. Longitudinal effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node staging on patient-reported outcomes in endometrial cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:90.e1-90.e20. [PMID: 34400137 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with endometrial cancer with localized disease are effectively treated and survive for a long time. The primary treatment is hysterectomy, to which surgical staging procedures may be added to assess the need for adjuvant therapy. Longitudinal data on patient-reported outcomes comparing different levels of primary treatment are lacking, especially when adjuvant radiotherapy is omitted. OBJECTIVE We assessed the impact of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy on patient-reported symptoms, function, and quality of life. We hypothesized that these treatment modalities would substantially affect patient-reported outcomes at follow-up. STUDY DESIGN We prospectively included patients with endometrial cancer enrolled in the ongoing MoMaTEC2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02543710). Patients were asked to complete the patient-reported outcome questionnaires European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire EN24 preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Functional domains and symptoms were analyzed for the whole cohort and by treatment received. To assess the effect of the individual treatment modifications, we used mixed regression models. RESULTS Baseline data were available for 448 patients. Of these patients, 339 and 219 had reached 1-year follow-up and 2-year follow-up, respectively. Treatment included hysterectomy (plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) alone (n=177), hysterectomy and lymph node staging without adjuvant therapy (n=133), or adjuvant chemotherapy irrespective of staging procedure (n=138). Overall, patients reported improved global health status and quality of life (+9 units; P<.001), increased emotional and social functioning, and increased sexual interest and activity (P<.001 for all) from baseline to year 1, and these outcomes remained stable at year 2. Means of functional scales and quality of life were similar to age- and sex-weighted reference cohorts. Mean tingling and numbness and lymphedema increased after treatment. The group who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a larger mean reduction in physical functioning (-6 vs +2; P=.002) at year 1, more neuropathy (+30 vs +5; P<.001; year 1) at years 1 and 2, and more lymphedema at year 1 (+11 vs +2; P=.007) than the group treated with hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy only. In patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, patient-reported outcomes were similar regardless of lymph node staging procedures. Adjuvant chemotherapy independently increased fatigue, lymphedema, and neuropathy in mixed regression models. CONCLUSION Patients with endometrial cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy reported significantly reduced functioning and more symptoms up to 2 years after treatment. For patients treated by surgery alone, surgical staging did not seem to affect the quality of life or symptoms to a measurable degree at follow-up. Therefore, subjecting patients to lymph node removal to tailor adjuvant therapy seems justified from the patient's viewpoint; however, efforts should increase to find alternatives to traditional chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Forsse
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Mark L Barbero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Henrica M J Werner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kathrine Woie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Nina Nordskar
- Department of Gynecology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Berge Nilsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helse Stavanger-Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marie Ellstrøm Engh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Faculty Division Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo
| | - Ingvild Vistad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway; Clinical Institute II, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Astri Rege
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway
| | - Margaret Sævik-Lode
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helse Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Stine Andreasen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway
| | - Ingfrid S Haldorsen
- Department of Radiology, Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Helse Bergen, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Section for Radiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jone Trovik
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Camilla Krakstad
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Suvaal I, Hummel SB, Mens JWM, van Doorn HC, van den Hout WB, Creutzberg CL, Ter Kuile MM. A sexual rehabilitation intervention for women with gynaecological cancer receiving radiotherapy (SPARC study): design of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1295. [PMID: 34863145 PMCID: PMC8642903 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08991-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sexual problems are frequently reported after treatment with radiotherapy (RT) for gynaecological cancer (GC), in particular after combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy (EBRT+BT). Studies demonstrate that psychosexual support should include cognitive behavioural interventions and involvement of the patient's partner, if available. Therefore, we developed a nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention, including these key components. The intervention was previously pilot-tested and results demonstrated that this intervention improves women's sexual functioning and increases dilator compliance. The objective of the current study is to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of the intervention compared to optimal care as usual (CAU). We expect that women who receive the intervention will report a statistically significant greater improvement in sexual functioning and - for women who receive EBRT+BT - higher compliance with dilator use, from baseline to 12 months post-RT than women who receive optimal care as usual (CAU). METHODS/DESIGN The intervention is evaluated in the SPARC (Sexual rehabilitation Programme After Radiotherapy for gynaecological Cancer) study, a multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT). The primary endpoint is sexual functioning. Secondary outcomes include body image, fear of sexual activity, sexual-, treatment-related- and psychological distress, health-related quality of life and relationship satisfaction. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be conducted in which the costs of the intervention will be related to shifts in other health care costs and the impact on patient outcome. The study sample will consist of 220 women with GC treated with RT in specialized GC treatment centres (N = 10). Participants are randomized to either the intervention- or CAU control group (1:1), and within each centre stratified by type of radiotherapy (EBRT+BT vs. EBRT only) and having a partner (yes/no). All women complete questionnaires at baseline (T1) and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-RT (T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively). DISCUSSION There is a need to improve sexual functioning after RT for GC. This RCT will provide evidence about the (cost-)effectiveness of a nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention. If proven effective, the intervention will be a much needed addition to care offered to GC survivors and will result in improved quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03611517 . Registered 2 August 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Suvaal
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Zone K6-T, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Susanna B Hummel
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Zone K6-T, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem M Mens
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Helena C van Doorn
- Department of Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wilbert B van den Hout
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Moniek M Ter Kuile
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Zone K6-T, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kim YJ, Yu J, Park SP, Lee SH, Kim YS. Prevention of radiotherapy induced enteropathy by probiotics (PREP): protocol for a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1032. [PMID: 34530750 PMCID: PMC8444386 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08757-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation induced enteropathy is a common complication of radiotherapy for pelvic tumors and adversely affects patient quality of life. Probiotics are thought to restore bowel microflora to optimal levels and reinforce intestinal barrier capacity. Although probiotics are effective in the treatment of radiation induced enteropathy, less is known about their efficacy to prevent radiation induced enteropathy. METHODS This double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study will investigate the efficacy of probiotics to prevent radiation-induced enteropathy in patients with gynecologic or urologic cancer who received pelvic radiotherapy. The study is designed to enroll 248 eligible patients, who will be randomized 1:1 to a probiotic or placebo group. Toxicities will be evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. DISCUSSION The primary aim of this study is to provide high level evidence for the ability of probiotics to prevent acute radiation induced enteropathy. The secondary aims are to determine the effects of probiotics on the incidence of chronic radiation induced enteropathy and the safety of probiotics in patients with gynecologic or urologic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03978949 , Registered on 7 June 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Joo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea
| | - Jesang Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Pyo Park
- Department of Ophthalmology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, College of Medicine, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 05355 Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea
| | - Young Seok Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505 Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chopra S, Gupta S, Kannan S, Dora T, Engineer R, Mangaj A, Maheshwari A, Shylasree TS, Ghosh J, Paul SN, Phurailatpam R, Charnalia M, Alone M, Swamidas J, Mahantshetty U, Deodhar K, Kerkar R, Shrivastava SK. Late Toxicity After Adjuvant Conventional Radiation Versus Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer (PARCER): A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3682-3692. [PMID: 34506246 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER), a phase III randomized trial, compared late toxicity after image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in women with cervical cancer undergoing postoperative radiation. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive either IG-IMRT or 3D-CRT after stratification for the type of hysterectomy and use of concurrent chemotherapy. The primary end point was 3-year grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v 3.0 and estimated using time-to-event, intention-to-treat analysis, with a study level type I error of 0.05 and a nominal α of .047 after accounting for one interim analysis. Secondary end points included acute toxicity, health-related quality of life, and pelvic relapse-free, disease-free, and overall survival. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2019, 300 patients were randomly assigned (IG-IMRT 151 and 3D-CRT 149). At a median follow-up of 46 (interquartile range 20-72) months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity in the IG-IMRT and 3D-CRT arms were 21.1% versus 42.4% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.73; P < .001). The cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 any late toxicity was 28.1% versus 48.9% (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.76; P < .001), respectively. Patients reported reduced diarrhea (P = .04), improved appetite (P = .008), and lesser bowel symptoms (P = .002) with IG-IMRT. However, no difference was observed in the time by treatment interaction. The 3-year pelvic relapse-free survival and disease-free survival in the IG-IMRT versus the 3D-CRT arm were 81.8% versus 84% (HR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.99; P = .55) and 76.9% versus 81.2% (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.71; P = .89), respectively. CONCLUSION IG-IMRT results in reduced toxicity with no difference in disease outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sadhana Kannan
- Epidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Tapas Dora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Sangrur, Punjab, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Akshay Mangaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amita Maheshwari
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - T Surappa Shylasree
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jaya Ghosh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Siji N Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Reena Phurailatpam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mayuri Charnalia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mitali Alone
- Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jamema Swamidas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Umesh Mahantshetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kedar Deodhar
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rajendra Kerkar
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shyam K Shrivastava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Proktologische Nebenwirkungen nach Strahlentherapie gynäkologischer Tumoren. COLOPROCTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00053-021-00548-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
25
|
Jensen GL, Barry PN, Eldredge-Hindy H, Silva SR, Todd SL, Hammonds KP, Zimmerman WR, Metzinger DS, El-Ghamry MN. Vaginal cuff brachytherapy: do we need to treat to more than a two-centimeter active length? J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:294-301. [PMID: 34122569 PMCID: PMC8170526 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines recommend using a 3-5 cm active length (AL) when treating vaginal cuff (VC) in adjuvant setting of endometrial cancer (EC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate local control and toxicity, using an AL of 1 or 2 cm and immobilization with a traditional table-mounted (stand) or patient-mounted (suspenders) device. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2005 and 2019, 247 patients with EC were treated with adjuvant high-dose-rate vaginal cuff (HDR-VC) brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation (EBRT). Treatment was prescribed to a 0.5 cm depth, with an AL of 1 or 2 cm, using stand or suspenders. VC boost after EBRT was typically administered with 2 fractions of 5.5 Gy, while VC brachytherapy alone was typically applied with 3 fractions of 7 Gy or 5 fractions of 5.5 Gy. RESULTS The combination of suspender immobilization and an AL of 2 cm (n = 126, 51%) resulted in 5-year local control of 100%. An AL of 2 cm compared to 1 cm correlated with better local control (99.1% vs. 88.5%, p = 0.0479). Regarding immobilization, suspenders correlated with improved local control compared to stand (100% vs. 86.7%, p = 0.0038). Immobilization technique was significantly correlated with AL (p < 0.0001). Only 5 (2.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicity, all of whom received EBRT. CONCLUSIONS In the present series, an AL of 2 cm provided excellent local control, while 1 cm was inadequate. Suspender immobilization was a practical alternative to stand immobilization in HDR brachytherapy of the vaginal cuff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett L. Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, USA
| | - Parul N. Barry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Women’s Hospital, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Harriet Eldredge-Hindy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, USA
| | - Scott R. Silva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, USA
| | - Sarah L. Todd
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, USA
| | | | - Walker R. Zimmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, USA
| | - Daniel S. Metzinger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, USA
| | - Moataz N. El-Ghamry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Adjuvant vaginal interventional radiotherapy in early-stage non-endometrioid carcinoma of corpus uteri: a systematic review. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:231-243. [PMID: 33897798 PMCID: PMC8060961 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This systematic review focused on rare histological types of corpus uteri malignancy, including uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), and uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC), and it is proposed to assist with clinical decision-making. Adjuvant treatment decisions must be made based on available evidences. We mainly investigated the role of vaginal interventional radiotherapy (VIRt) in UCS, UCCC, and UPSC managements. Material and methods A systematic research using PubMed and Cochrane library was conducted to identify full articles evaluating the efficacy of VIRt in early-stage UPSC, UCCC, and UCS. A search in ClinicalTrials.gov was performed in order to detect ongoing or recently completed trials as well as in PROSPERO for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. Survival outcomes and toxicity rates were obtained. Results All studies were retrospective. For UCS, the number of evaluated patients was 432. The 2- to 5-year average local control (LC) was 91% (range, 74.2-96%), disease-free survival (DFS) 88% (range, 82-94%), overall survival (OS) 79% (range, 53.8-84.3%), the average 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 70% (range, 70-94%), and G3-G4 toxicity was 0%. For UCCC, the number of investigated patients was 335 (UCCC – 124, mixed – 211), with an average 5-year LC of 100%, DFS of 83% (range, 82-90%), OS of 93% (range, 83-100%), and G3-G4 toxicity of 0%. For UPSC, the number of examined patients was 1,092 (UPSC – 866, mixed – 226). The average 5-year LC was 97% (range, 87.1-100%), DFS 84% (range, 74.7-95.6%), OS 93% (range, 71.9-100%), CSS 89% (range, 78.9-94%), and G3-G4 toxicity was 0%. Conclusions These data suggest that in adequately selected early-stage UPSC and UCCC patients, VIRt alone may be suitable in women who underwent surgical staging and received adjuvant chemotherapy. In early-stage UCS, a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach has to be planned, considering high-rate of pelvic and distant relapses.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cyr MP, Dumoulin C, Bessette P, Pina A, Gotlieb WH, Lapointe-Milot K, Morin M. Characterizing Pelvic Floor Muscle Function and Morphometry in Survivors of Gynecological Cancer Who Have Dyspareunia: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. Phys Ther 2021; 101:6124113. [PMID: 33522584 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE More than one-half of gynecological cancer survivors are affected by pain during sexual intercourse, also known as dyspareunia. Oncological treatments may result in pelvic floor muscle (PFM) alterations, which are suspected to play a key role in dyspareunia. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated PFM function and morphometry in this population. The aim of the study was to characterize and compare PFM function and morphometry between gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia and asymptomatic women. METHODS Twenty-four gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia and 32 women with a history of total hysterectomy but without pelvic pain (asymptomatic women) participated in this comparative cross-sectional study. PFM passive forces (tone), flexibility, stiffness, maximal strength, coordination, and endurance were assessed with an intra-vaginal dynamometric speculum. Bladder neck position, levator plate angle, anorectal angle, and levator hiatal dimensions were measured at rest and on maximal contraction with 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound imaging. RESULTS Compared with asymptomatic women, gynecological cancer survivors showed heightened PFM tone, lower flexibility, higher stiffness, and lower coordination and endurance. At rest, they had a smaller anorectal angle and smaller levator hiatal dimensions, indicating heightened PFM tone. They also presented fewer changes from rest to maximal contraction for anorectal angle and levator hiatal dimensions, suggesting an elevated tone or altered contractile properties. CONCLUSIONS Gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia present with altered PFM function and morphometry. This research therefore provides a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of dyspareunia in cancer survivors. IMPACT Our study confirms alterations in PFM function and morphometry in gynecological cancer survivors with dyspareunia. These findings support the rationale for developing and assessing the efficacy of physical therapy targeting PFM alterations in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Pierre Cyr
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chantale Dumoulin
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Research Center of the Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Paul Bessette
- Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Annick Pina
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Korine Lapointe-Milot
- Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mélanie Morin
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Urologic, lymphedema, pelvic pain and gastrointestinal symptoms increase after radiotherapy in patients with primary uterine tumors: a prospective longitudinal Swedish cohort study. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1752-1760. [PMID: 33686481 PMCID: PMC8310482 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02576-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT) causes an inflammatory reaction of the tissue which leads to fibrosis and reduced functioning of the pelvic organs. Few studies have shown significant relationships between side effects and RT in uterine tumors. Here, the urological, lymphedema, pelvic pain and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were studied before and after RT in patients with primary uterine tumors using the EORTC QLQ-EN24, specifically designed for uterine cancer patients. METHODS This prospective cohort study comprised patients with primary uterine tumors who received pelvic radiotherapy (RT). A total of 43 patients were included from May 2014 to February 2019. Patients completed the questionnaires for global health status and functioning before the start of RT and at 3 and 12 months after RT. RESULTS We found a significant worsening of the urological symptoms 3 months after RT which persisted up to 12 months after RT compared to baseline values prior to start of RT (p = 0.007). An exacerbation of the urinary symptoms was seen in patients with vaginal brachytherapy/boost compared to patients with pelvic RT at 12 months after RT (p = 0.053). The severity of lymphedema symptoms increased from RT start to 12 months after RT (p = 0.019) and the pelvic pain were higher at 3 months after RT compared to before RT (p = 0.004). Also, the level of GI symptoms was significantly higher 12 months after RT compared to the RT start (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The urologic, lymphedema, pelvic pain and GI symptoms all increase after RT.
Collapse
|
29
|
Fabian A, Krug D, Alkatout I. Radiotherapy and Its Intersections with Surgery in the Management of Localized Gynecological Malignancies: A Comprehensive Overview for Clinicians. J Clin Med 2020; 10:E93. [PMID: 33383960 PMCID: PMC7796321 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10010093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgery, including minimally invasive surgery, and radiotherapy are key modalities in the treatment of gynecological malignancies. The aim of this review is to offer the multidisciplinary care team a comprehensive summary of the intersections of surgery and radiotherapy in the local treatment of gynecological malignancies. Recent advances in radiotherapy are highlighted. Relevant publications were identified through a review of the published literature. Ovarian, endometrial, cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancer were included in the search. Current guidelines are summarized. The role of radiotherapy in adjuvant as well as definitive treatment of these entities is synthesized and put into context with surgery, focusing on survival and quality of life. Although these outcomes have improved recently, further research must be focused on the number of life years lost, and the potential morbidity encountered by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Ibrahim Alkatout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sanjida S, Obermair A, Gebski V, Armfield N, Janda M. Long-term quality of life outcomes of women treated for early-stage endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:530-536. [PMID: 33361459 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare long-term quality of life in women treated for early-stage endometrial cancer with population norms, and to compare quality of life outcomes of patients who had total laparoscopic or total abdominal hysterectomy. METHODS Once the last enrolled patient had completed 4.5 years of follow-up after surgery, participants in the Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium (LACE) clinical trial were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Two instruments-EuroQol 5 Dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General Population (FACT-GP)-were used to determine quality of life. The mean computed EQ-5D-3L index scores for LACE participants at different age categories were compared with Australian normative scores; and the FACT-GP scores were compared between patients treated with surgical treatments. RESULTS Of 760 women originally enrolled in the LACE trial, 259 (50.2%) of 516 women consented to provide long-term follow-up data at a median of 9 years (range 6-12) after surgery. On the EQ-5D-3L, long-term endometrial cancer survivors reported higher prevalence of anxiety/depression than normative levels across all age groups (55-64 years, 30% vs 14.9%; 65-74 years, 30.1% vs 15.8%; ≥75 years, 25.9% vs 10.7%). For women ≥75 years of age, the prevalence of impairment in mobility (57.6% vs 43.3%) and usual activities (58.8% vs 37.9%) was also higher than for population norms. For the FACT-GP, the physical (effect size: -0.28, p<0.028) and functional (effect size: -0.30, p<0.015) well-being sub-scale favored the total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with total abdominal hysterectomy recipients. CONCLUSION Compared with population-based norms, long-term endometrial cancer survivors reported higher prevalence of anxiety/depression across all age groups, and deficits in mobility and usual activities for women aged ≥75 years. Physical and functional well-being were better among women who were treated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy than among those receiving total abdominal hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saira Sanjida
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Val Gebski
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nigel Armfield
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gultekin M, Yilmaz MT, Biltekin F, Yuce D, Sari SY, Akyol F, Yildiz F. Adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of conventional versus 3-dimensional planning in endometrial cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:601-605. [PMID: 33437309 PMCID: PMC7787204 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.101694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate dosimetric differences between point-based 2-dimensional (2D) vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) treatment planning technique and volume-based 3-dimensional (3D) VBT method for endometrial cancer (EC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten patients with uterine-confined EC treated with VBT were included in this study. All patients received 27.5 Gy in 5 fractions. Three different treatment plans were performed for each patient: plan A for dose prescribed to the entire vaginal wall thickness delineated via computed tomography guidance, plan B for dose prescribed to the vaginal mucosa/cylinder surface, and plan C for dose prescribed to 5 mm beyond the vaginal mucosa/cylinder surface. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) of treatment volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated and compared. RESULTS DVH analysis of target volume doses (D100, D95, and D90) showed a significant difference between plan A and plan B (p = 0.005), and plan B was found lower. D100 for plan C was significantly higher than plan A (p = 0.009), but for D95 and D90, no statistically significant difference was found (p = 0.028 and p = 0.028, respectively). In terms of OARs doses, including vagina, rectum, bladder, and sigmoid, D2cm3 doses were significantly higher in plan A than plan B (p = 0.009, p = 0.009, p = 0.005, and p = 0.005, respectively). All these doses were also significantly lower than in plan C (p = 0.005, p = 0.012, and p = 0.013, respectively), except for sigmoid (p = 0.155). CONCLUSIONS In this dosimetric analysis, we have shown that the volume-based 3D VBT technique provides the ability to balance the target dose against the sparing of OARs. Therefore, in the new modern 3D treatment era, instead of normalization of the dose to standard reference points, customized 3D volume-based VBT planning should be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melis Gultekin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Melek Tugce Yilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatih Biltekin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Deniz Yuce
- Department of Preventive Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fadil Akyol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ferah Yildiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Post CCB, de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, Katsaros D, Bessette P, Haie-Meder C, Ottevanger NPB, Ledermann JA, Khaw P, D'Amico R, Fyles A, Baron MH, Kitchener HC, Nijman HW, Lutgens LCHW, Brooks S, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Feeney A, Goss G, Fossati R, Ghatage P, Leary A, Do V, Lissoni AA, McCormack M, Nout RA, Verhoeven-Adema KW, Smit VTHBM, Putter H, Creutzberg CL. Long-Term Toxicity and Health-Related Quality of Life After Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy or Radiation Therapy Alone for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in the Randomized PORTEC-3 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:975-986. [PMID: 33129910 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The survival results of the PORTEC-3 trial showed a significant improvement in both overall and failure-free survival with chemoradiation therapy versus pelvic radiation therapy alone. The present analysis was performed to compare long-term adverse events (AE) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS AND MATERIALS In the study, 660 women with high-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to receive chemoradiation therapy (2 concurrent cycles of cisplatin followed by 4 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel) or radiation therapy alone. Toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. HRQOL was measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 and CX24/OV28 subscales and compared with normative data. An as-treated analysis was performed. RESULTS Median follow-up was 74.6 months; 574 (87%) patients were evaluable for HRQOL. At 5 years, grade ≥2 AE were scored for 78 (38%) patients who had received chemoradiation therapy versus 46 (24%) who had received radiation therapy alone (P = .008). Grade 3 AE did not differ significantly between the groups (8% vs 5%, P = .18) at 5 years, and only one new late grade 4 toxicity had been reported. At 3 and 5 years, sensory neuropathy toxicity grade ≥2 persisted after chemoradiation therapy in 6% (vs 0% after radiation therapy, P < .001) and more patients reported significant tingling or numbness at HRQOL (27% vs 8%, P < .001 at 3 years; 24% vs 9%, P = .002 at 5 years). Up to 3 years, more patients who had chemoradiation therapy reported limb weakness (21% vs 5%, P < .001) and lower physical (79 vs 87, P < .001) and role functioning (78 vs 88, P < .001) scores. Both treatment groups reported similar long-term global health/quality of life scores, which were better than those of the normative population. CONCLUSIONS This study shows a long-lasting, clinically relevant, negative impact of chemoradiation therapy on toxicity and HRQOL, most importantly persistent peripheral sensory neuropathy. Physical and role functioning impairments were seen until 3 years. These long-term data are essential for patient information and shared decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathalijne C B Post
- Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Stephanie M de Boer
- Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Melanie E Powell
- Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dionyssios Katsaros
- Surgical Sciences and Gynecology, Città della Salute and S Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Paul Bessette
- Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Jonathan A Ledermann
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pearly Khaw
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Romerai D'Amico
- Radiotherapy, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale, Lecco, Italy
| | - Anthony Fyles
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marie Hélène Baron
- Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Henry C Kitchener
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Susan Brooks
- Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Amanda Feeney
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geraldine Goss
- Medical Oncology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roldano Fossati
- Medical Oncology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Gynecologic Oncology, Calgary-Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alexandra Leary
- Cancer Medicine and Gynecological Tumor Translational Research Lab, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Viet Do
- Radiation Oncology, Liverpool & Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Mary McCormack
- Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Remi A Nout
- Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Karen W Verhoeven-Adema
- Central Data Management and Trial Coordination, Comprehensive Cancer Center Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hein Putter
- Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Le retentissement du cancer utérin et ses traitements sur la sexualité. SEXOLOGIES 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sexol.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
34
|
Aoki Y, Kanao H, Wang X, Yunokawa M, Omatsu K, Fusegi A, Takeshima N. Adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer today. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:753-765. [PMID: 32463094 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer frequently occurs in post-menopausal women, and the endometrium is a well-known site of cancer affecting women. Endometrial cancer is found with genital bleeding and often at an early stage. However, there are some risks of recurrence after hysterectomy. As a medical treatment after the diagnosis of endometrial cancer, appropriate adjuvant therapy is considered to lead to a decrease in the rate of recurrence and improvement of prognosis according to the determination of the cancer stage from the surgical and histopathological results. In this review, we describe post-operative adjuvant therapy administered for endometrial cancer and advanced disease, focusing on chemotherapy, radiation therapy and the combination of both. These treatments are divided according to the risk of recurrence as based primarily on the reported evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Aoki
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kanao
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Xipeng Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Fusegi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Perinatal and Women's Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Takeshima
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kadan Y, Asali A, Fishman A, Helpman L, Perri T, Korach J, Beiner M. Time interval from biopsy to surgery and risk for adjuvant therapy in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. Surg Oncol 2020; 35:1-4. [PMID: 32771956 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2020] [Revised: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Among patients with endometrial cancer, longer wait times to surgery were associated with decreased survival. Although endometrial cancer survival rate is high, about 45% of patients receive adjuvant therapy. The aim of this study was to examine whether a longer interval from diagnosis to surgery is associated with increased need for adjuvant treatment among patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of endometrioid endometrial cancer patients treated with surgery between the years 1999 and 2013 was conducted. Patients with pre-operative histology of hyperplasia, grade 1/2 cancers were included. Patients with stage IV disease were excluded. Demographic, clinicopathologic and surgical parameters were collected and correlation with wait time was evaluated. The risk for adjuvant therapy was in two-week intervals from biopsy to hysterectomy. RESULTS 468 patients were included in the final cohort. 84.3% had stage I disease and 43.8% patients received adjuvant treatment. Mean time from diagnosis to surgery was 63.88 days (SD 10.3, 31-94). The risk for adjuvant therapy was not increased at any of the time intervals that were examined. CONCLUSION In low risk endometrial cancer, longer time interval between diagnosis and surgery did not increase the need for adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yfat Kadan
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Center. Affiliated with the Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Aula Asali
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ami Fishman
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Limor Helpman
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Tamar Perri
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer. Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jacob Korach
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer. Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mario Beiner
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Walree IC, Hamaker ME, de Rooij BH, Boll D, van Huis-Tanja LH, Emmelot-Vonk MH, Ezendam NPM. Do age and comorbidity impair recovery during two years after treatment for endometrial cancer? J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:1078-1086. [PMID: 32169547 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A better understanding of the impact of age and comorbidity on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may improve treatment decision-making in patients with endometrial cancer. We investigated whether either age or comorbidity is more strongly associated with changes in HRQoL over time. METHODS Endometrial cancer patients (n = 296) were invited to complete questionnaires after initial treatment and after 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up. Patients were divided into subgroups according to age (<60, 60-75 and ≥75 years) and according to comorbidity (0, 1, 2 or ≥3). HRQoL was measured with the five EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning scales. Linear mixed models were performed for the different subgroups to assess changes in HRQoL over time. HRQoL was also compared to longitudinal outcomes from an age- and gender-matched normative population. RESULTS The first questionnaire was returned by 221 patients (75%) of whom six were excluded due to progressive disease. Changes in HRQoL were mainly associated with cumulative comorbidity burden and not with age. Patients with comorbidity reported deterioration of physical and role functioning between 12 and 24 months. Compared to the normative population, patients initially scored higher on physical and role functioning, but at 24 months outcomes were no longer different. CONCLUSION Cumulative comorbidity burden was more strongly associated with deterioration of HRQoL than patient's age. Therefore, patients with endometrial cancer and multiple comorbid conditions require careful follow-up of HRQoL after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inez C van Walree
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Marije E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Belle H de Rooij
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, the Netherlands
| | - Dorry Boll
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Nicole P M Ezendam
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Clinical Outcome of Exclusively Radiographer-led Delivery of Postoperative Vaginal Vault Brachytherapy for Endometrial Cancer – The Addenbrooke's Experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:844-849. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
38
|
Alban GM, Buscariollo DL, Cheng T, Pretz J, Krechmer B, Buzurovic I, Singer L, King M, Lee L. Low-Dose Adjuvant Cylinder Brachytherapy for Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 10:95-103. [PMID: 31783169 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to evaluate outcomes and sites of failure for women with early stage endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with adjuvant high-dose-rate (HDR) vaginal brachytherapy (VB) with a low dose scheme. METHODS AND MATERIALS Retrospective review identified 318 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-II endometrioid endometrial cancer who received adjuvant HDR VB to a dose of 24 Gray (Gy) in 6 fractions from 2005 to 2017. Patients with <6 months follow-up were excluded. Dose was prescribed to cylinder surface and computerized tomography (CT) imaging was performed before each fraction to assess cylinder placement. Rates of vaginal relapse (VR), pelvic nodal relapse, distant metastasis, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed by log rank test or Cox proportional hazards. Pretreatment CT images were analyzed for patients with VR. RESULTS Median follow-up was 42 months for 243 patients. The 3-year rates of VR, pelvic nodal relapse, distant metastasis, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were 1.9%, 1.5%, 4.3%, 94.1%, and 98.9%, respectively. The 3-year VR rates by Gynecologic Oncology (GOG)-99 risk groups were 0%, 1.4%, and 3.2% for low risk, low-intermediate risk, and high-intermediate risk (HIR) disease (P = .5). By Post-operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC) risk stratification, 3-year VR rate was 1.3% for HIR disease. On review of pretreatment CT images of the 6 patients with VR, 3 patients had relapse at the introitus outside of the treated vaginal length, and 3 had in-field recurrence at the vaginal apex. Higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with VR, with a 14% increase in risk per BMI unit (kg/m2, P = .02). There were no reported grade 2 GI or any grade 3 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant HDR VB with a low-dose regimen results in excellent clinical outcomes for patients with early stage endometrioid endometrial cancer. Patients with higher BMI may be at increased risk of VR, and additional study is needed to optimize brachytherapy treatment parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela M Alban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniela L Buscariollo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Teresa Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Pretz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Betty Krechmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ivan Buzurovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa Singer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Martin King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Larissa Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lower Extremity Lymphedema in Gynecologic Cancer Patients: Propensity Score Matching Analysis of External Beam Radiation versus Brachytherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11101471. [PMID: 31574979 PMCID: PMC6827029 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11101471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The goal of this study is to compare the risk of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) between pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and vaginal brachytherapy, and to identify risk factors for LEL in gynecologic cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after radical surgery. A total of 263 stage I–III gynecologic cancer patients who underwent adjuvant RT were retrospectively reviewed. One-to-one case-matched analysis was conducted with propensity scores generated from patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Using the risk factors found in this study, high- and low-risk groups were identified. With a median follow-up of 36.0 months, 35 of 263 (13.3%) patients developed LEL. In multivariate analysis, laparoscopic surgery (HR 2.548; p = 0.024), harvesting more than 30 pelvic lymph nodes (HR 2.246; p = 0.028), and para-aortic lymph node dissection (PALND, HR 2.305; p = 0.014) were identified as independent risk factors for LEL. After propensity score matching, the LEL incidence of the brachytherapy group was significantly lower than the EBRT group (p = 0.025). In conclusion, high-risk patients with risk factors such as laparoscopic surgery, harvesting more than 30 pelvic lymph nodes, PALND, and adjuvant pelvic EBRT require closer observation for LEL.
Collapse
|
40
|
Guy CL, Fields EC, Quinn BA, Fisher CM, Ladbury CJ, Romano KD, Todor D. The vaginal cylinder: Misunderstood, misused, or trivial? An in-depth dosimetric and multiinstitutional outcome investigation. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:763-770. [PMID: 31558353 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact on dose distribution and radiobiological metrics of common high-dose-rate vaginal brachytherapy treatment parameters and to analyze multiinstitutional data for clinically significant impact on outcomes in early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Treatment plans were created for all combinations of prescription parameters and used to quantify the dosimetric impact of each parameter and to estimate the dose delivered using common voxel-integrated radiobiological metrics. A rating system, based on risk grouping from GOG and PORTEC trials, was used to consolidate staging information into a cancer "aggressiveness" measure. Correlations between the rating, toxicity, disease recurrence, and plan parameters were investigated. RESULTS When prescribing to 5 mm depth, the variation caused by the diameter was very large across all dose metrics, ranging from 51% to 175% increase with the most divergence in BEDmax. For surface prescription, changing the cylinder diameter from 4 cm to 2 cm caused the dose metrics of BEDmin, Dmin, and gBEUD (a = -3) to increase by 117%, 67%, and 52%, respectively. Prescription to 5-mm depth caused changes across all dose metrics of 260% compared with surface prescription for a 2-cm cylinder. Deeper prescription point (p = 0.005) and longer treatment length (p = 0.01) were correlated with increased stenosis rates. No correlation between recurrence and any plan parameter was found. CONCLUSIONS Dramatic differences in dose distributions arise by small variations of plan parameters, with large impact on rates of vaginal stenosis, but no clear relation with local recurrence. To help radiation oncologists interpret the magnitude of these effects for their patients, we created a tool that allows comparison between dose and fractionation parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher L Guy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Emma C Fields
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Bridget A Quinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | | | - Colton J Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Kara D Romano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Dorin Todor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Corman S, Nwankwo C. Lost Annual Productivity Costs Due to Uterine Cancer Deaths in the United States in 2014. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019; 28:929-933. [DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
42
|
Brooks RA, Fleming GF, Lastra RR, Lee NK, Moroney JW, Son CH, Tatebe K, Veneris JL. Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69:258-279. [PMID: 31074865 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 253] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and its incidence is rising. Although there have been significant recent advances in our understanding of endometrial cancer biology, many aspects of treatment remain mired in controversy, including the role of surgical lymph node assessment and the selection of patients for adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. For the subset of women with microsatellite-instable, metastatic disease, anti- programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and numerous trials are attempting to build on this early success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Brooks
- Associate Professor, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Dr. Brooks is now the Associate Professor and Chief of the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - Gini F Fleming
- Professor of Medicine and Director, Medical Oncology Breast Program, Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ricardo R Lastra
- Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Nita K Lee
- Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - John W Moroney
- Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Christina H Son
- Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ken Tatebe
- Resident, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jennifer L Veneris
- Instructor of Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Akbaba S, Oelmann-Avendano JT, Krug D, Arians N, Bostel T, Hoerner-Rieber J, Nicolay NH, Debus J, Lindel K, Foerster R. The impact of vaginal dilator use on vaginal stenosis and sexual quality of life in women treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:902-912. [PMID: 30997541 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01466-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a lack of evidence and low compliance, current guidelines recommend the use of a vaginal dilator (VD) after pelvic radiotherapy (RT). We analyzed the effect of VD on vaginal stenosis (VS) and its influence on sexual quality of life (QoL) in women treated with adjuvant RT for endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS Between 2014 and 2015, 56 consecutive patients were instructed to use a VD after completion of treatment. The maximum diameter of the comfortably introducible VD was measured before and at 1 year after treatment. The degree of VS was evaluated clinically, and sexual QoL was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) sexual functioning items before RT, during RT, at 6 weeks, and at 1 year after RT. RESULTS One year after RT, mean VD diameter had decreased by 2.7 ± 3.2 mm (p < 0.001) and 36 patients (64.3%) had clinical VS (grade I-III). A larger decrease in VD diameter correlated with a higher degree of clinical VS (p < 0.001). VD use (p = 0.81), RT modality (p = 0.68), and adjuvant ChT (p = 0.87) had no influence on VD diameter. Sexual activity decreased during RT and increased beyond pre-RT values 1 year after RT (p < 0.001). Sexual enjoyment decreased continuously during and after completion of RT (p = 0.013) and was influenced negatively by a higher degree of clinical VS (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Almost two thirds of patients developed clinical VS 1 year after adjuvant RT for EC, and sexual enjoyment was substantially reduced by VS. The use of a VD after RT may not serve to prevent sexual impairments and VS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan T Oelmann-Avendano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Moltkestrasse 90, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Passarello K, Kurian S, Villanueva V. Endometrial Cancer: An Overview of Pathophysiology, Management, and Care. Semin Oncol Nurs 2019; 35:157-165. [PMID: 30867105 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship concerns surrounding endometrial cancer. DATA SOURCES A review of articles dated 2006-2018 from PubMed and NCCN guidelines. CONCLUSION Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Staging and treatment are primarily surgical, with adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy administered as indicated by grade and stage. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Cancer prevention, response to treatment, and quality of life can be affected by lifestyle factors, including nutrition, exercise, and tobacco use. Nurses in diverse roles and practice settings can educate patients about lifestyle choices that can affect individuals across the cancer trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Passarello
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center -The Woodlands, The Woodlands, TX.
| | - Shiney Kurian
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Valerie Villanueva
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
|
47
|
Buckingham L, Haggerty A, Graul A, Morgan M, Burger R, Ko E, Andy U, Giuntoli R. Sexual function following hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: A five-year follow up investigation. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 152:139-144. [PMID: 30420200 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine a baseline and five-year follow up sexual function score in women undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. METHODS A cross-section of endometrial cancer patients receiving care from 2006 to 2010 was identified. Patients were surveyed during academic year 2011 using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ). Respondents were re-surveyed in 2016. The PISQ was also administered at a single time point to a control group of urogynecology patients. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software, version 13.1. RESULTS 129 endometrial cancer and 63 matched urogynecology patients responded to an initial survey and sufficiently answered the PISQ. There was no statistical difference in BMI, race, diabetes, or smoking history between groups. In 2011, 62.5% of endometrial cancer patients versus 72.6% of urogynecology patients reported sexual activity (p = 0.166). Median PISQ score for these groups was 33 [IQR 29-38] and 32 [IQR 28-37] respectively (p = 0.472). Twenty-nine (22%) endometrial cancer patients sufficiently answered the initial and 5-year follow up PISQ to be included in follow up analysis. Median PISQ score at five years was not significantly different from baseline: 31 [IQR 27-39] versus 33 [IQR 31-38] (p = 0.299). With multivariable modeling, no demographic or clinical characteristics of endometrial cancer patients were independently associated with sexual function (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS Sexual function for endometrial cancer patients was not significantly different from women treated for benign disease. Sexual function also remained stable for endometrial cancer patients regardless of time from initial treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to better characterize sexual function in endometrial cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Buckingham
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Third Floor, West Pavilion, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Ashley Haggerty
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Third Floor, West Pavilion, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA
| | - Ashley Graul
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Third Floor, West Pavilion, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA
| | - Mark Morgan
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Third Floor, West Pavilion, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA
| | - Robert Burger
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Third Floor, West Pavilion, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA
| | - Emily Ko
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Third Floor, West Pavilion, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA
| | - Uduak Andy
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Third Floor, West Pavilion, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA
| | - Robert Giuntoli
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Third Floor, West Pavilion, Philadelphia 19104, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Quality of life and oncological outcome in endometrial cancer patients after vaginal brachytherapy: comparison of two dosing schemes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 299:507-514. [PMID: 30357499 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4951-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vaginal brachytherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence and was shown to be equieffective in preventing vaginal vault recurrence, but less toxic compared to external-beam radiotherapy in a subset of high intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients and is administered as single adjuvant treatment in those patients. Different radiotherapeutic approaches with various dosing schemes exist toward brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome and long-term quality of life after brachytherapy with two different high-dose-rate dosing schemes. METHODS Retrospective analysis was conducted of the recurrence and survival rates of 104 patients with endometrial cancer FIGO stage I-II that underwent adjuvant brachytherapy with three times 5 Gy or four times 5 Gy to the upper two-thirds of the vaginal vault in two different institutions between January 2010 and December 2013. Quality of life was assessed by EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire and EN 24 module. RESULTS The vaginal vault recurrence rates were 4.9% and 5.0% for patients treated with 3 × 5 Gy and 4 × 5 Gy, respectively (p = 0.98). We did not observe a difference in pelvic recurrence (p = 0.96), overall survival (p = 0.33) or quality of life between the different radiotherapy regimens. Metastatic recurrence and the use of chemotherapy contribute to impairment on quality of life. Younger patients (< 70 years) reported worse emotional functioning (p = 0.02) and higher symptom scales of diarrhea (p = 0.01) and financial problems (p = 0.03). Sexual activity was lower in patients younger than 70 years (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effect of dosing schemes on recurrence rates and quality of life. Younger patients (< 70 years) seem to experience greater reduction in quality of life due to endometrial cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|
49
|
Wortman BG, Creutzberg CL, Putter H, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Lutgens LCHW, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Mens JWM, Slot A, Kroese MCS, van Triest B, Nijman HW, Stelloo E, Bosse T, de Boer SM, van Putten WLJ, Smit VTHBM, Nout RA. Ten-year results of the PORTEC-2 trial for high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma: improving patient selection for adjuvant therapy. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:1067-1074. [PMID: 30356126 PMCID: PMC6219495 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0310-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background PORTEC-2 was a randomised trial for women with high-intermediate risk (HIR) endometrial cancer, comparing pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). We evaluated long-term outcomes combined with the results of pathology review and molecular analysis. Methods 427 women with HIR endometrial cancer were randomised between 2002–2006 to VBT or EBRT. Primary endpoint was vaginal recurrence (VR). Pathology review was done in 97.4%, combined with molecular analysis. Results Median follow-up was 116 months; 10-year VR was 3.4% versus 2.4% for VBT vs. EBRT (p = 0.55). Ten-year pelvic recurrence (PR) was more frequent in the VBT group (6.3% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.004), mostly combined with distant metastases (DM). Ten-year isolated PR was 2.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.10, and DM 10.4 vs. 8.9% (p = 0.45). Overall survival for VBT vs. EBRT was 69.5% vs. 67.6% at 10 years (p = 0.72). L1CAM and p53-mutant expression and substantial lymph-vascular space invasion were risk factors for PR and DM. EBRT reduced PR in cases with these risk factors. Conclusion Long-term results of the PORTEC-2 trial confirm VBT as standard adjuvant treatment for HIR endometrial cancer. Molecular risk assessment has the potential to guide adjuvant therapy. EBRT provided better pelvic control in patients with unfavourable risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B G Wortman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J J Jobsen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - L C H W Lutgens
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - J W M Mens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC- Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Slot
- Radiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | | | - B van Triest
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H W Nijman
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - E Stelloo
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - T Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S M de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W L J van Putten
- Department of Biostatistics, ErasmusMC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V T H B M Smit
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
De Boer SM, Nout RA, Bosse T, Creutzberg CL. Adjuvant therapy for high-risk endometrial cancer: recent evidence and future directions. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 19:51-60. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1531708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M. De Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A. Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Carien L. Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|