On the use of pharmacogenetics in cancer treatment and clinical trials

Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Docetaxel Treatment of Prostate Cancer: From Discovery to Implementation

Prostate cancer is the fifth leading cause of male cancer death worldwide. Although docetaxel chemotherapy has been used for more than fifteen years to treat metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, the high inter-individual variability of treatment efficacy and toxicity is still not well understood. Since prostate cancer has a high heritability, inherited biomarkers of the genomic signature may be appropriate tools to guide treatment. In this review, we provide an extensive overview and discuss the current state of the art of pharmacogenomic biomarkers modulating docetaxel treatment of prostate cancer. This includes (1) research studies with a focus on germline genomic biomarkers, (2) clinical trials including a range of genetic signatures, and (3) their implementation in treatment guidelines. Based on this work, we suggest that one of the most promising approaches to improve clinical predictive capacity of pharmacogenomic biomarkers in docetaxel treatment of prostate cancer is the use of compound, multigene pharmacogenomic panels defined by specific clinical outcome measures. In conclusion, we discuss the challenges of integrating prostate cancer pharmacogenomic biomarkers into the clinic and the strategies that can be employed to allow a more comprehensive, evidence-based approach to facilitate their clinical integration. Expanding the integration of pharmacogenetic markers in prostate cancer treatment procedures will enhance precision medicine and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Germinal immunogenetics as a predictive factor for immunotherapy

Clinical response to checkpoint inhibitors-based (CPIs) therapies can vary among tumor types and between patients. This led to a significant amount of pre-clinical and clinical research into biomarker identification. Biomarkers have been found to cover both the tumor itself and the tumor microenvironment. Entering host-related parameters into the equation should provide a valuable strategy for identifying not only factors predictive of treatment efficacy but also of treatment-related toxicity. It is clear that germline variants can offer efficient and easily-assessable indicators (blood DNA) to enlarge the spectrum of predictive markers for CPI-based treatment. A major issue concerns the real functional significance of the reported single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) linked to CPI-treatment outcome. Powered calculations should lead to an optimal trade-off between sample size and allele frequency. New molecular technologies and new analytical methods should provide opportunities to bridge the knowledge gap between SNP-CPI treatment associations and the functional impact of these SNPs.

Pharmacogenetics of treatments for pancreatic cancer

Introduction: Despite clinical efforts, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis. The scarcity of effective therapies can be reflected by the lack of reliable biomarkers to adapt anticancer drugs prescription to tumors' and patients' features. Areas covered: Pharmacogenetics should provide the way to select patients who may benefit from a specific therapy that best matches individual and tumor genetic profile, but it has not yet led to gains in outcome. This review describes PDAC pharmacogenetics findings, critically reappraising studies on polymorphisms and -omics profiles correlated to response to gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX, and nab-paclitaxel combinations, as well as limitations of targeted therapies. Further, we question whether personalized approaches will benefit patients to any significant degree, supporting the need of new strategies within well-designed trials and validated genomic tests for treatment decision-making. Expert opinion: A major challenge in PDAC is the identification of subgroups of patients who will benefit from treatments. Minimally-invasive tests to analyze biomarkers of drug sensitivity/toxicity should be developed alongside anticancer treatments. However, progress might fall below expectations because of tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution. Whole-genome sequencing and liquid biopsies, as well as prospective validation in selected cohorts, should overcome the limitations of traditional pharmacogenetic approaches.

Role of genomic factors beyond thymidylate synthase in the prediction of response to 5-fluorouracil

5-Fluorouracil (5FU) is still a major drug in combinations regimens for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) both in the adjuvant and palliative setting. 5FU or its oral prodrug capecitabine is usually combined with irinotecan/oxaliplatin and the novel agents bevacizumab/cetuximab. Although this improved the outcome, the overall prognosis in patients with metastasized disease is still relatively poor. Although the target for 5FU, thymidylate synthase was shown to have a predictive value, this could only predict response in a subset of patients. Given the heterogeneous and complex nature of CRC, it is likely that other aberrations can affect therapeutic response. As an alternative, we investigated Copy number alterations using oligonucleotide-based high-throughput array-comparative-genomic-hybridization (aCGH) to obtain an unbiased screening of the whole genetic spectrum. Chromosomal aberrations have been identified in 85% of CRC patients and include genomic regions harboring copy number alterations in the DNA. These alterations may change the expression of many genes and might explain the differential response to therapy as shown in recent studies with several 5FU combinations. In order to clarify new predictive parameters for 5FU, we used aCGH in a historical cohort of patients, which received treatment with single agent 5FU, and an unsupervised clustering analysis showed a statistical (p < 0.05) difference between responding and nonresponding patients. We also find that several regions showed differences between responders/non-responders, such as losses in 12p12.3-12q15 and in 18p (where TS is located) in responding patients. Genome-wide analysis may provide an additional tool to discriminate between responders and nonresponders.

The impact of DNA damage response gene polymorphisms on therapeutic outcomes in late stage ovarian cancer

Late stage epithelial ovarian cancer has a dismal prognosis. Identification of pharmacogenomic markers (i.e. polymorphisms) to stratify patients to optimize individual therapy is of paramount importance. We here report the retrospective analysis of polymorphisms in 5 genes (ATM, ATR, Chk1, Chk2 and CDK12) involved in the cellular response to platinum in a cohort of 240 cancer patients with late stage ovarian cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate associations between the above mentioned SNPs and patients’ clinical outcomes: overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). None of the ATM, ATR, Chk1 and Chk2 polymorphisms was found to significantly affect OS nor PFS in this cohort of patients. Genotype G/G of CDK12 polymorphism (rs1054488) predicted worse OS and PFS than the genotype A/A-A/G in univariate analysis. The predictive value was lost in the multivariate analysis. The positive correlation observed between this polymorphism and age, grade and residual tumor may explain why the CDK12 variant was not confirmed as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis.The importance of CDK12 polymorphism as possible prognostic biomarker need to be confirmed in larger ovarian cancer cohorts, and possibly in other cancer population responsive to platinum agents.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of Gemcitabine as a mainstay in adult and pediatric oncology: an EORTC-PAMM perspective

Gemcitabine is an antimetabolite ranking among the most prescribed anticancer drugs worldwide. This nucleoside analog exerts its antiproliferative action after tumoral conversion into active triphosphorylated nucleotides interfering with DNA synthesis and targeting ribonucleotide reductase. Gemcitabine is a mainstay for treating pancreatic and lung cancers, alone or in combination with several cytotoxic drugs (nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin and oxaliplatin), and is an option in a variety of other solid or hematological cancers. Several determinants of response have been identified with gemcitabine, i.e., membrane transporters, activating and inactivating enzymes at the tumor level, or Hedgehog signaling pathway. More recent studies have investigated how germinal genetic polymorphisms affecting cytidine deaminase, the enzyme responsible for the liver disposition of gemcitabine, could act as well as a marker for clinical outcome (i.e., toxicity, efficacy) at the bedside. Besides, constant efforts have been made to develop alternative chemical derivatives or encapsulated forms of gemcitabine, as an attempt to improve its metabolism and pharmacokinetics profile. Overall, gemcitabine is a drug paradigmatic for constant searches of the scientific community to improve its administration through the development of personalized medicine in oncology.

Genetic prediction of long-term survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced esophageal cancer

Candidate genes involved in DNA repair, 5-fluorouracil metabolism and drug detoxification were genotyped in 124 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer and their predictive role for long-term relapse-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated. A panel including MTHFR 677TT, MDR1 2677GT, GSTP1 114CC, XPC 499CC and XPC 939AC+CC, defined as high-risk genotypes, discriminated subgroups with significantly different outcomes. When the panel was combined with histology, patients split into two subsets with 5-year RFS and CSS rates of 65% vs 27% (hazard ratio (HR) 3.0, P<0.0001) and 69% vs 31% (HR 2.9, P<0.0001), respectively. Combining the 5-single-nucleotide polymorphism (5-SNP) panel with pathological response defined two major informative risk classes with 5-year PFS and CSS rates of 79.4% vs 17.7% (HR 6.71, P<0.0001) and 79.3% vs 26.3% (HR 6.25, P<0.0001), respectively. This classification achieved a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 85.4% and an accuracy of 81.8%.

Pharmacogenetic allele nomenclature: International workgroup recommendations for test result reporting

This article provides nomenclature recommendations developed by an international workgroup to increase transparency and standardization of pharmacogenetic (PGx) result reporting. Presently, sequence variants identified by PGx tests are described using different nomenclature systems. In addition, PGx analysis may detect different sets of variants for each gene, which can affect interpretation of results. This practice has caused confusion and may thereby impede the adoption of clinical PGx testing. Standardization is critical to move PGx forward.

Germ line polymorphisms as predictive markers for pre-surgical radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a 5-year literature update and critical review

PURPOSE

Locally advanced rectal cancer is currently treated with pre-surgical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Approximately one-half of patients obtain a relevant shrinkage/disappearance of tumour, with major clinical advantages. The remaining patients, in contrast, show no benefit and possibly need alternative treatment. To provide the best therapeutic option for each individual patient, predictive markers have been widely researched. This review was undertaken to evaluate recent progress made in this field.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Scopus database, focused on germ line gene polymorphisms as biomarkers and response and toxicity as outcomes. Because an exhaustive previous review was available describing findings up to 2008, we restricted our analysis to the last 5 years.

RESULTS

Ten original research articles were found, reporting promising results for some candidate genes in drug metabolism (TYMS, MTHFR), DNA repair (XRCC1, OGG1, CCND1) and inflammation (SOD2, TGFB1)/immunity (IL13) pathways, but with no firm conclusion. All the studies had small sample size and were defined as exploratory. This review highlights pivotal molecular, clinical, genetic and statistical issues in the investigation of genetic polymorphisms as outcome predictors for rectal cancer and offers suggestions for future development.

CONCLUSIONS

What emerges is a clear need for new proposals, especially in view of the increasing evidence for tumour-host and gene-gene interactions during anticancer treatment, together with stronger adherence to proper methodological requirements.

Update on Aurora Kinase Targeted Therapeutics in Oncology

INTRODUCTION: Mammalian cells contain three distinct serine/threonine protein kinases with highly conserved catalytic domains, including aurora A and B kinases that are essential regulators of mitotic entry and progression. Overexpression of aurora A and/or B kinase is associated with high proliferation rates and poor prognosis, making them ideal targets for anti-cancer therapy. Disruption of mitotic machinery is a proven anti-cancer strategy employed by multiple chemotherapeutic agents. Numerous small molecule inhibitors of the aurora kinases have been discovered and tested in vivo and in vitro, with a few currently in phase II testing. AREAS COVERED: This review provides the reader with updated results from both preclinical and human studies for each of the aurora kinase inhibitors (AKI) that are currently being investigated. The paper also covers in detail the late breaking and phase I data presented for AKIs thereby allowing the reader to compare and contrast individual and classrelated effects of AKIs. EXPERT OPINION: While the successful development and approval of an AKI for anti-cancer therapy remains unresolved, pre-clinical identification of resistant mechanisms would help design better early phase clinical trials where relevant combinations may be evaluated prior to phase II testing. The authors believe that aurora kinases are important anti-cancer targets that operate in collaboration with other oncogenes intimately involved in uncontrolled tumor proliferation and by providing a unique, targeted and complimentary anti-cancer mechanism, expand the available armamentarium against cancer.