1
|
Olsen EA, Whittaker S, Willemze R, Pinter-Brown L, Foss F, Geskin L, Schwartz L, Horwitz S, Guitart J, Zic J, Kim YH, Wood GS, Duvic M, Ai W, Girardi M, Gru A, Guenova E, Hodak E, Hoppe R, Kempf W, Kim E, Lechowicz MJ, Ortiz-Romero P, Papadavid E, Quaglino P, Pittelkow M, Prince HM, Sanches JA, Sugaya M, Vermeer M, Zain J, Knobler R, Stadler R, Bagot M, Scarisbrick J. Primary cutaneous lymphoma: recommendations for clinical trial design and staging update from the ISCL, USCLC, and EORTC. Blood 2022; 140:419-437. [PMID: 34758074 PMCID: PMC9353153 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021012057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of patients with primary cutaneous lymphoma (PCL) relative to other non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) is small and the number of subtypes large. Although clinical trial guidelines have been published for mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome, the most common type of PCL, none exist for the other PCLs. In addition, staging of the PCLs has been evolving based on new data on potential prognostic factors, diagnosis, and assessment methods of both skin and extracutaneous disease and a desire to align the latter with the Lugano guidelines for all NHLs. The International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL), the United States Cutaneous LymphomaConsortium (USCLC), and the Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) now propose updated staging and guidelines for the study design, assessment, endpoints, and response criteria in clinical trials for all the PCLs in alignment with that of the Lugano guidelines. These recommendations provide standardized methodology that should facilitate planning and regulatory approval of new treatments for these lymphomas worldwide, encourage cooperative investigator-initiated trials, and help to assess the comparative efficacy of therapeutic agents tested across sites and studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise A Olsen
- Department of Dermatology and Department of Medicine, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Sean Whittaker
- School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Kings College London and St. Johns Institute of Dermatology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rein Willemze
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lauren Pinter-Brown
- Departments of Medicine and Dermatology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA
| | - Francine Foss
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Larisa Geskin
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Lawrence Schwartz
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven Horwitz
- Department of Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joan Guitart
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - John Zic
- Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Youn H Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
| | - Gary S Wood
- Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Madeleine Duvic
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dermatology Unit, Houston, TX
| | - Wei Ai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Michael Girardi
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Alejandro Gru
- Divisions of Dermatopathology and Hematopathology, Department of Pathology, Emily Couric Clinical Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Emmanuella Guenova
- Department of Dermatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emmilia Hodak
- Division of Dermatology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Richard Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Werner Kempf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich and Kempf and Pfaltz Histologische Diagnostik, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ellen Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mary Jo Lechowicz
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine and Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| | - Pablo Ortiz-Romero
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, i+12 Institute, CIBERONC, Medical School, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Evangelia Papadavid
- Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Pietro Quaglino
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy
| | - Mark Pittelkow
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - H Miles Prince
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jose Antonio Sanches
- Department of Dermatology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Makoto Sugaya
- Department of Dermatology, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Maarten Vermeer
- Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jasmine Zain
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Robert Knobler
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rudolf Stadler
- University Clinic for Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Centre, University of Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - Martine Bagot
- Department of Dermatology, Université de Paris, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France; and
| | - Julia Scarisbrick
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Primary cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphomas that present in the skin with no evidence of extracutaneous disease at the time of diagnosis. CTCL subtypes demonstrate a variety of clinical, histological, and molecular features, and can follow an indolent or a very aggressive course. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms are not yet entirely understood. The pathophysiology of CTCL is complex and a single initiating factor has not yet been identified. Diagnosis is based on clinicopathological correlation and requires an interdisciplinary team. Treatment decision is made based on short-term and long-term goals. Therapy options comprise skin-directed therapies, such as topical steroids or phototherapy, and systemic therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies or chemotherapy. So far, the only curative treatment approach is allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Novel therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells, monoclonal antibodies or small molecules, are being investigated in clinical trials. Patients with CTCL have reduced quality of life and a lack of effective treatment options. Further research is needed to better identify the underlying mechanisms of CTCL development and course as well as to better tailor treatment strategies to individual patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Quaglino P, Prince H, Cowan R, Vermeer M, Papadavid L, Bagot M, Servitjie O, Berti E, Guenova E, Stadler R, Querfeld C, Busschots A, Hodak E, Patsatsi A, Sanches J, Maule M, Yoo J, Kevin M, Fava P, Ribero S, Zocchi L, Rubatto M, Fierro M, Wehkamp U, Marshalko M, Mitteldorf C, Akilov O, Ortiz-Romero P, Estrach T, Vakeva L, Enz P, Wobser M, Bayne M, Jonak C, Rubeta M, Forbes A, Bates A, Battistella M, Amel-Kashipaz R, Vydianath B, Combalia A, Georgiou E, Hauben E, Hong E, Jost M, Knobler R, Amitay-Laish I, Miyashiro D, Cury-Martins J, Martinez X, Muniesa C, Prag-Naveh H, Nikolaou V, Quint K, Ram-Wolff C, Rieger K, Stranzenbach R, Szepesi Á, Alberti-Violetti S, Felicity E, Cerroni L, Kempf W, Whittaker S, Willemze R, Kim Y, Scarisbrick J. Treatment of early-stage mycosis fungoides: results from the PROspective Cutaneous Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (PROCLIPI) study. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184:722-730. [PMID: 32479678 PMCID: PMC7704558 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PROspective Cutaneous Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (PROCLIPI) study is a prospective analysis of an international database. Here we examine front-line treatments and quality of life (QoL) in patients with newly diagnosed mycosis fungoides (MF). OBJECTIVES To identify (i) differences in first-line approaches according to tumour-nodes-metastasis-blood (TNMB) staging; (ii) parameters related to a first-line systemic approach and (iii) response rates and QoL measures. METHODS In total, 395 newly diagnosed patients with early-stage MF (stage IA-IIA) were recruited from 41 centres in 17 countries between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018 following central clinicopathological review. RESULTS The most common first-line therapy was skin-directed therapy (SDT) (322 cases, 81·5%), while a smaller percentage (44 cases, 11·1%) received systemic therapy. Expectant observation was used in 7·3%. In univariate analysis, the use of systemic therapy was significantly associated with higher clinical stage (IA, 6%; IB, 14%; IIA, 20%; IA-IB vs. IIA, P < 0·001), presence of plaques (T1a/T2a, 5%; T1b/T2b, 17%; P < 0·001), higher modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (> 10, 15%; ≤ 10, 7%; P = 0·01) and folliculotropic MF (FMF) (24% vs. 12%, P = 0·001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant associations with the presence of plaques (T1b/T2b vs. T1a/T2a, odds ratio 3·07) and FMF (odds ratio 2·83). The overall response rate (ORR) to first-line SDT was 73%, while the ORR to first-line systemic treatments was lower (57%) (P = 0·027). Health-related QoL improved significantly both in patients with responsive disease and in those with stable disease. CONCLUSIONS Disease characteristics such as presence of plaques and FMF influence physician treatment choices, and SDT was superior to systemic therapy even in patients with such disease characteristics. Consequently, future treatment guidelines for early-stage MF need to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Quaglino
- Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin Medical School, Torino, Italy
| | - H.M. Prince
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - R. Cowan
- Christie Hospital, Manchester UK
| | - M. Vermeer
- Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | | | - M. Bagot
- Hospital St Louis, Paris, France
| | - O. Servitjie
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - R. Stadler
- University Medical Centre, Johannes Wesling, Minden, Germany
| | - C. Querfeld
- City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, California, US
| | | | - E. Hodak
- Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - A. Patsatsi
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, in Papageorgiou General Hospital, Greece
| | - J. Sanches
- University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Brazil, South America
| | - M. Maule
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy
| | - J. Yoo
- University Hospitals Birmingham, UK
| | - M. Kevin
- University Hospitals Birmingham, UK
| | - P. Fava
- Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin Medical School, Torino, Italy
| | - S. Ribero
- Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin Medical School, Torino, Italy
| | - L. Zocchi
- Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin Medical School, Torino, Italy
| | - M. Rubatto
- Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin Medical School, Torino, Italy
| | - M.T. Fierro
- Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin Medical School, Torino, Italy
| | - U. Wehkamp
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - C. Mitteldorf
- HELIOS Klinikum Hildesheim GmbH, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - O. Akilov
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - T. Estrach
- Hospital Clinico, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - L. Vakeva
- Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland
| | - P.A. Enz
- Hospital Italiano De Buenos Aires, Argentina, South America
| | - M. Wobser
- University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | - C. Jonak
- Dept of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - M. Rubeta
- Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford UK
| | | | - A. Bates
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | | | - A. Combalia
- Hospital Clinico, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - E. Georgiou
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, in Papageorgiou General Hospital, Greece
| | - E. Hauben
- Belgium University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - M. Jost
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - R. Knobler
- Dept of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - D. Miyashiro
- University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Brazil, South America
| | - J. Cury-Martins
- University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Brazil, South America
| | - X. Martinez
- City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, California, US
| | - C. Muniesa
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - K. Quint
- Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - R. Stranzenbach
- University Medical Centre, Johannes Wesling, Minden, Germany
| | - Á. Szepesi
- Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - L. Cerroni
- Department of Dermatology, Research Unit Dermatopathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - W. Kempf
- Kempf und Pfaltz, Histologische Diagnostik, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S. Whittaker
- Kings College London, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London
| | - R. Willemze
- Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Howles A, Scarisbrick J. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: practical recommendations to enhance clinical practice. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2021; 82:1-6. [PMID: 33792384 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2021.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Management of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma should provide a holistic approach to a patient's wellbeing. Treatments depend on the stage of lymphoma. Patients with the early stages tend to have a near-normal life expectancy. Management should be aimed at improving the extent of disease and reducing symptoms with minimal therapeutic adverse effects. Skin-directed treatments are preferred and may be used in combination with treatments for symptom relief such as anti-pruritic medication. In advanced stages of disease where the median life expectancy is reduced the aims are also to prevent disease progression and prolong life, and this requires a multidisciplinary approach. Symptom control remains important as patients often have painful, itchy disfiguring lesions which greatly impact on health-related quality of life. National and international guidelines provide stage-related treatment options to be considered with first-line options followed by subsequent second-line therapies. All are listed in no particular order of preference and are chosen according to patients' needs and expertise of the treating centre. Several first-line options may be chosen before moving to the second-line options. Three drugs received European Medicines Agency approval in 2017 and 2018 (chlormethine gel, brentuximab and mogamulizumab) but there still remains an unmet need for more improved treatments or combinations. Most treatments only result in a partial response and there is no cure for early-stage disease; as such, patients live for a long time with their disease. In the advanced stages if a good response is achieved eligible patients will be considered for an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Howles
- Skin Lymphoma Group, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Garbe C, Peris K, Soura E, Forsea AM, Hauschild A, Arenbergerova M, Bylaite M, Del Marmol V, Bataille V, Samimi M, Gandini S, Saiag P, Eigentler TK, Lallas A, Zalaudek I, Lebbe C, Grob JJ, Hoeller C, Robert C, Dréno B, Arenberger P, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Kaufmann R, Malvehy J, Puig S, Leiter U, Ribero S, Papadavid E, Quaglino P, Bagot M, John SM, Richard MA, Trakatelli M, Salavastru C, Borradori L, Marinovic B, Enk A, Pincelli C, Ioannides D, Paul C, Stratigos AJ. The evolving field of Dermato-oncology and the role of dermatologists: Position Paper of the EADO, EADV and Task Forces, EDF, IDS, EBDV-UEMS and EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34:2183-2197. [PMID: 32840022 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of skin cancers has been increasing steadily over the last decades. Although there have been significant breakthroughs in the management of skin cancers with the introduction of novel diagnostic tools and innovative therapies, skin cancer mortality, morbidity and costs heavily burden the society. OBJECTIVE Members of the European Association of Dermato-Oncology, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, International Dermoscopy Society, European Dermatology Forum, European Board of Dermatovenereology of the European Union of Medical Specialists and EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force have joined this effort to emphasize the fundamental role that the specialist in Dermatology-Venereology has in the diagnosis and management of different types of skin cancer. We review the role of dermatologists in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancers and cutaneous lymphomas, and discuss approaches to optimize their involvement in effectively addressing the current needs and priorities of dermato-oncology. DISCUSSION Dermatologists play a crucial role in virtually all aspects of skin cancer management including the implementation of primary and secondary prevention, the formation of standardized pathways of care for patients, the establishment of specialized skin cancer treatment centres, the coordination of an efficient multidisciplinary team and the setting up of specific follow-up plans for patients. CONCLUSION Skin cancers represent an important health issue for modern societies. The role of dermatologists is central to improving patient care and outcomes. In view of the emerging diagnostic methods and treatments for early and advanced skin cancer, and considering the increasingly diverse skills, knowledge and expertise needed for managing this heterogeneous group of diseases, dermato-oncology should be considered as a specific subspecialty of Dermatology-Venereology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Garbe
- Center for Dermato-oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - K Peris
- Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - E Soura
- 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A M Forsea
- Department of Oncologic Dermatology, University Hospital Elias, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - M Arenbergerova
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital of Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M Bylaite
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Dermatovenereology, Clinic of Infectious Diseases and Dermatovenereology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - V Del Marmol
- Dermatology Department, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - V Bataille
- Dermatology Department, West Herts NHS Trust, London, UK.,Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Department, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - M Samimi
- Departments of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - S Gandini
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Saiag
- Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, APHP, & EA 4340, 'Biomarkers in Cancerology and Hemato-Oncology', UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - T K Eigentler
- Departments of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - A Lallas
- First Dermatology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - I Zalaudek
- Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - C Lebbe
- Department of Dermatology, AP-HP Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - J-J Grob
- Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - C Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Robert
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.,Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - B Dréno
- Department of Dermatolo-Cancerology, CHU Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA, University Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - P Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital of Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Kandolf-Sekulovic
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - R Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - J Malvehy
- Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomédiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Biomedical Research Networking Centre on rarae disease (CIBERER), ISCIII, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Puig
- Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomédiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Biomedical Research Networking Centre on rarae disease (CIBERER), ISCIII, Barcelona, Spain
| | - U Leiter
- Center for Dermato-oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - S Ribero
- Dermatology Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - E Papadavid
- 2nd Department of Dermatology-Venereology, ATTIKON Hospital, National and Kapodistrian Univeristy of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - P Quaglino
- Dermatology Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - M Bagot
- Department of Dermatology, AP-HP Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - S M John
- Department Dermatology, Environmental Medicine, Health Theory, University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany
| | - M-A Richard
- Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - M Trakatelli
- 2nd Department of Dermatology-Venerology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C Salavastru
- Pediatric Dermatology Discipline, Dermato-oncology Research Facility, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - L Borradori
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - B Marinovic
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - A Enk
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Pincelli
- DermoLab, Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - D Ioannides
- First Dermatology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C Paul
- Department of Dermatology, Toulouse University, Toulouse, France
| | - A J Stratigos
- 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Skin colonization by circulating neoplastic clones in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2020; 134:1517-1527. [PMID: 31515249 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2019002516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a mature T-cell lymphoma currently thought to develop primarily in the skin by a clonal expansion of a transformed, resident memory T cell. However, this concept does not explain the key characteristics of MF, such as the debut with multiple, widespread skin lesions or inability of skin-directed therapies to provide cure. The testable inference of the mature T-cell theory is the clonality of MF with respect to all rearranged T-cell receptor (TCR) genes. Here, we used a whole-exome sequencing approach to detect and quantify TCR-α, β, and γ clonotypes in tumor cell clusters microdissected from MF lesions. This method allowed us to calculate the tumor cell fraction of the sample and therefore an unequivocal identification of the TCR clonotypes as neoplastic. Analysis of TCR sequences from 29 patients with MF stage I to IV proved the existence of multiple T-cell clones within the tumor cell fraction, with a considerable variation between patients and between lesions from the same patient (median, 11 clones; range, 2-80 clones/sample). We have also detected multiple neoplastic clones in the peripheral blood in all examined patients. Based on these findings, we propose that circulating neoplastic T-cell clones continuously replenish the lesions of MF, thus increasing their heterogeneity by a mechanism analogous to the consecutive tumor seeding. We hypothesize that circulating neoplastic clones might be a promising target for therapy and could be exploited as a potential biomarker in MF.
Collapse
|