Evolution and recurrence of gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors

Case report: Inflammatory sternoclavicular joint arthritis induced by an immune checkpoint inhibitor with remarkable responsiveness to infliximab

This report describes the case of a 48-year-old woman who presented with sternoclavicular joint arthritis after administration of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), durvalumab, for small cell lung carcinoma. The onset of arthritis transpired 18 months after the commencement of the ICI therapeutic regimen and demonstrated resilience to glucocorticoid treatment. After excluding infectious aetiologies and metastatic involvement, the patient was diagnosed with ICI-induced arthritis (ICI-IA). Considering the articular implications akin to the SAPHO syndrome, the patient was treated with infliximab, resulting in complete resolution. This finding implies that biological DMARDs can serve as effective interventions for ICI-induced sternoclavicular joint arthritis. Given the heterogeneous nature of its pathogenesis, the selection of therapeutic agents may require customization based on the distinct clinical presentation of each individual case.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated gastritis: Patterns and management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used due to their effectiveness in treating various tumors. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are defined as adverse effects resulting from ICI treatment. Gastrointestinal irAEs are a common type of irAEs characterized by intestinal side effects, such as diarrhea and colitis, which may lead to the cessation of ICIs. Although irAE gastritis is rarely reported, it may lead to serious complications such as gastrorrhagia. Furthermore, irAE gastritis is often difficult to identify early due to its diverse symptoms. Although steroid hormones and immunosuppressants are commonly used to reverse irAEs, the best regimen and dosage for irAE gastritis remains uncertain. In addition, the risk of recurrence of irAE gastritis after the reuse of ICIs should be considered. In this editorial, strategies such as early identification, pathological diagnosis, management interventions, and immunotherapy rechallenge are discussed to enable clinicians to better manage irAE gastritis and improve the prognosis of these patients.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2% to 40%, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2 % to 40 %, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Serious immune-related upper gastrointestinal toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multicenter case series

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve the prognosis of many cancers but cause immune-related adverse events (IrAEs). Limited data are available on upper gastrointestinal (UGI) IrAEs. We describe the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and efficacy of medical therapy in patients with UGI IrAEs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with UGI symptoms and moderate to severe endoscopic UGI lesions, occurring after ICI. Efficacy of induction medical therapy and at the most recent follow-up was assessed.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included; of these, 34 (85%) received anti-PD(L)1, either alone (n = 24) or combined with anti CTLA-4 (n = 10). Eighteen patients (45%) had concomitant enterocolitis. All patients had severe endoscopic lesions (erosions, ulcerations, hemorrhage, or necrotic lesions). Three patients who received an inefficient initial medical treatment had a complicated course: One patient died of enterocolitis, one had a pneumomediastinum, and one developed an ulcerated stricture of the pylorus. Thirty-five patients (88%) were treated with corticosteroids; 28 patients (80%) responded, and 20 (57%) reached clinical remission. Eight patients were treated with infliximab, and six responded (75%). After a median follow-up of 11 months, 36 patients (90%) were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission for their UGI symptoms. Endoscopic lesions persisted in 68% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI cause severe UGI IrAEs, which are associated with enterocolitis in approximately half of the patients. Most patients with UGI IrAEs respond to corticosteroids or infliximab. These data support the recommendation to treat these patients without delay and in the same way as those with enterocolitis.

Treatment and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated colitis/diarrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the outcomes of cancer patients. However, ICIs often lead to colitis/diarrhea. This study aimed to assess the treatment of ICIs-associated colitis/diarrhea and outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible studies which investigated the treatment and outcomes of colitis/diarrhea developing in patients who received ICIs. The pooled incidences of any-grade colitis/diarrhea, low-grade colitis, high-grade colitis, low-grade diarrhea, and high-grade diarrhea as well as the pooled rates of response to treatment, mortality, and ICIs permanent discontinuation and restarts in patients with ICIs-associated colitis/diarrhea were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Among the 11,492 papers initially identified, 27 studies were included. The pooled incidences of any-grade colitis/diarrhea, low-grade colitis, high-grade colitis, low-grade diarrhea, and high-grade diarrhea were 17%, 3%, 17%, 13%, and 15%, respectively. The pooled rates of overall response, response to corticosteroid therapy, and response to biological agents were 88%, 50%, and 96%, respectively. The pooled short-term mortality in patients with ICIs-associated colitis/diarrhea was 2%. The pooled incidences of ICIs permanent discontinuation and restarts were 43% and 33%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ICIs-associated colitis/diarrhea is common, but rarely lethal. Half of them are responsive to corticosteroid therapy. There is a fairly high rate of response to biological agents in steroid-refractory colitis/diarrhea patients.

A new marker constructed from immune-related lncRNA pairs can be used to predict clinical treatment effects and prognosis: in-depth exploration of underlying mechanisms in HNSCC

BACKGROUND

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) plays a vital role in tumor proliferation, migration, and treatment. Since it is challenging to standardize the gene expression levels detected by different platforms, the signatures composed of many immune-related single lncRNAs are still inaccurate. Utilizing a gene pair formed of two immune-related lncRNAs and strategically assigning values can effectively meet the demand for a higher-accuracy dual biomarker combination.

METHODS

Co-expression and differential expression analyses were performed on immune genes and lncRNAs data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the ImmPort database to obtain differentially expressed immune-related lncRNAs for pairwise pairing. The prognostic-related differentially expressed immune-related lncRNAs (PR-DE-irlncRNAs) pairs were then identified by univariate Cox regression and used for lasso regression to construct a prognostic model. Various methods were used to validate the predictive prognostic performance of the model. Additionally, we explored the potential guiding value of the model in immunotherapy and chemotherapy and constructed a nomogram suitable for efficient prognosis prediction. Mechanistic exploration of anti-tumor immunity and mutational perspectives are also included. We also analyzed the correlation between the model and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-related, N6-methyadenosine (m6A)-related, and multidrug resistance genes.

RESULTS

We used a total of 20 pairs of PR-DE-irlncRNAs to create a prognosis model. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction experiments further verified the abnormal expression of 11 lncRNAs in HNSCC cells. Various methods have confirmed the excellent performance of the model in predicting patient prognosis. We reasoned that lncRNAs/TP53 mutation might play a positive/negative anti-tumor role through the immune system by multi-perspective analyses. Finally, it was found that the prognostic model was closely related to immunotherapy and chemotherapy as well as the expression of ICIs/m6A/multidrug resistance-related genes.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic model performs excellently in predicting the prognosis of patients and provides the potential value of practical guidance for treatment.

Position statement on the management of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis via multidisciplinary modified Delphi consensus

INTRODUCTION

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer immunotherapy has shown increased overall survival in a wide range of cancer types with the associated risk of developing severe immune-mediated adverse events, commonly involving the gastrointestinal tract.

AIM

The aim of this position statement is to provide an updated practice advice to the gastroenterologists and oncologists on the diagnosis and management of ICI-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

METHODOLOGY

The evidence reviewed in this paper includes a comprehensive search strategy of English language publications. Consensus was reached using a three-round modified Delphi methodology and approved by the members of the Belgian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research and Development Group (BIRD), Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO), Belgian group of Digestive Oncology (BGDO), and Belgian Respiratory Society (BeRS).

CONCLUSIONS

The management of ICI-induced colitis requires an early multidisciplinary approach. A broad initial assessment is necessary (clinical presentation, laboratory markers, endoscopic and histologic examination) to confirm the diagnosis. Criteria for hospitalisation, management of ICIs, and initial endoscopic assessment are proposed. Even if corticosteroids are still considered the first-line therapy, biologics are recommended as an escalation therapy and as early treatment in patients with high-risk endoscopic findings.

Immunotherapy Resumption/Rechallenge in Melanoma Patients after Toxicity: Do We Have Another Chance?

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have radically changed the prognosis of several neoplasias, among them metastatic melanoma. In the past decade, some of these new drugs have appeared together with a new toxicity spectrum previously unknown to clinicians, until now. A common situation in daily practice is that a patient experiences toxicity due to this type of drug and we need to resume or rechallenge treatment after resolving the adverse event. Methods: A PubMed literature review was carried out. Results: The published data regarding the resumption or rechallenge of ICI treatment in melanoma patients is scarce and heterogeneous. Depending on the study reviewed, the recurrence incidence of grade 3–4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) ranged from 18% to 82%. Conclusion: It is possible to resume or rechallenge, but each patient should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team for close monitoring and assessment of the risk/benefit ratio before initiating treatment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor gastritis is often associated with concomitant enterocolitis, which impacts the clinical course

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events are frequently caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and often require interruption of cancer treatment. Compared with ICI colitis and enteritis, limited information exists about ICI gastritis. This study characterized clinical features and treatment outcomes of ICI gastritis.

METHODS

Consecutive cancer patients who received ICIs and underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies while on ICIs from 2011 to 2021 were retrospectively assessed. Specific histopathologic features identified ICI gastritis.

RESULTS

Of 6450 ICI-treated patients, 162 (2.5%) underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsies. ICI gastritis was identified in 54 (33%) biopsied patients; 38 (70%) had concurrent ICI enteritis/colitis and 16 (30%) had isolated ICI gastritis. Dyspepsia (38%) and bloating (25%) were the most frequent symptoms of isolated ICI gastritis. Compared with patients with concomitant enteritis/colitis, patients with isolated gastritis were less likely to have diarrhea (13% vs 68%; p < .001) or abdominal pain (19% vs 47%; p = .07). Patients with isolated ICI gastritis less frequently required glucocorticoids (69% vs 92%; p = .04) and had lower incidence of ICI hold/withdrawal (13% vs 42%; p = .06). There was no association between severity or extent of luminal inflammation and antitumor response (p = .85 and p = .44, respectively). Endoscopically, gastric mucosa appeared normal in 11 (20%) patients with biopsy-proven ICI gastritis.

CONCLUSION

ICI gastritis may present alone or more commonly with concurrent enteritis/colitis, which may differentiate its clinical course. Gastric biopsies are required to diagnose a substantial minority of endoscopically normal, clinically significant cases. Most patients with isolated gastritis can continue ICI therapy uninterrupted, but a notable proportion require glucocorticoids.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective anticancer treatments, but can cause inflammatory toxicities, including of the stomach (gastritis), intestine, and colon. Limited information is available on gastritis triggered by these agents. Adult patients with cancer who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and had an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies of the stomach were examined. More than two-thirds (70%) of people with checkpoint inhibitor gastritis also had inflammatory changes of the small intestine and/or colon. Compared with patients with isolated checkpoint gastritis, the subgroup with concomitant enteritis/colitis more frequently had abdominal pain, diarrhea, needed steroids, and/or needed to pause or stop antitumor therapy.

Implication of the Gut Microbiome and Microbial-Derived Metabolites in Immune-Related Adverse Events: Emergence of Novel Biomarkers for Cancer Immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed how we think about tumor management. Combinations of anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy have become the standard of care in many advanced-stage cancers, including as a first-line therapy. Aside from improved anti-tumor immunity, the mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) exposes a new toxicity profile known as immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). This novel toxicity can damage any organ, but the skin, digestive and endocrine systems are the most frequently afflicted. Most ICI-attributed toxicity symptoms are mild, but some are severe and necessitate multidisciplinary side effect management. Obtaining knowledge on the various forms of immune-related toxicities and swiftly changing treatment techniques to lower the probability of experiencing severe irAEs has become a priority in oncological care. In recent years, there has been a growing understanding of an intriguing link between the gut microbiome and ICI outcomes. Multiple studies have demonstrated a connection between microbial metagenomic and metatranscriptomic patterns and ICI efficacy in malignant melanoma, lung and colorectal cancer. The immunomodulatory effect of the gut microbiome can have a real effect on the biological background of irAEs as well. Furthermore, specific microbial signatures and metabolites might be associated with the onset and severity of toxicity symptoms. By identifying these biological factors, novel biomarkers can be used in clinical practice to predict and manage potential irAEs. This comprehensive review aims to summarize the clinical aspects and biological background of ICI-related irAEs and their potential association with the gut microbiome and metabolome. We aim to explore the current state of knowledge on the most important and reliable irAE-related biomarkers of microbial origin and discuss the intriguing connection between ICI efficacy and toxicity.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Gastritis Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Scoping Review

Among immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, immune-mediated gastritis (IMG) has been rarely described in the literature and has not yet been well characterized. This scoping review aimed to characterize IMG in terms of precipitating agents, clinical presentations, and prognosis. After the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for all peer-reviewed articles using keywords including "gastritis," "immune checkpoint inhibitor," and "immune-related adverse event" from their inception to December 28, 2021. Twenty-two articles, including 5 observational studies and 17 case reports and case series, were included. Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and combination therapy with those and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab) were commonly used in those with IMG. 59.8% had epigastric pain, and 50% had erosive gastritis. 87.5% had Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 gastritis, and 91.2% received corticosteroids. Recurrence was noted in 16.7%, and only 1 expiration was noted. 4.3% had positive helicobacter pylori and cytomegalovirus from the gastric specimen. Similar to immune-related colitis, patients with IMG may have a favorable prognosis with a better response to immune checkpoint inhibitors if treated appropriately. The diagnosis of IMG is made by exclusion, and a thorough workup is necessary to rule out concurrent helicobacter pylori and cytomegalovirus involvement. Further studies are critical for a better understanding of this complication.

Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Outcome of PD-L1 Negative and MSS Advanced Cancer Treated with PD-1 Inhibitors

Purpose

Tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), and expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have emerged as predictive biomarkers for responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in several cancer types. However, for patients with negative PD-L1 expression, or microsatellite stability (MSS), some cases may experience favorable response to immunotherapy, and there is currently a lack of good relevant predictors. We tried to introduce several peripheral blood markers for predicting treatment outcome and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in PD-L1 negative and MSS patients.

Methods

A retrospective study of 142 PD-L1 negative and MSS patients was carried out. The association of peripheral blood markers including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), and other factors with clinicopathological characters and prognosis were assessed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results

Lower level of PNI and poor performance status (ECOG score of 2) was correlated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and worse outcome of ICIs. The multivariate analysis revealed that PNI (for OS HR = 0.465, 95% CI: 0.236-0.916, p = 0.027; for PFS HR = 0.493, 95% CI: 0.251-0.936, p = 0.031) and ECOG score (for OS HR = 4.601, 95% CI: 2.676-7.910, p < 0.001; for PFS HR = 2.830, 95% CI: 1.707-4.691, p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. NLR was related to the onset of irAEs.

Conclusions

Pretreatment level of PNI and NLR, beyond PD-L1 expression and MSS, can improve the predictive accuracy for immunotherapy outcomes and has the potential to expand the candidate pool of patients for treatment with ICIs.

Sex Differences in Immunity

Strong epidemiological evidence now exists that sex is an important biologic variable in immunity. Recent studies, for example, have revealed that sex differences are associated with the severity of symptoms and mortality due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite this evidence, much remains to be learned about the mechanisms underlying associations between sex differences and immune-mediated conditions. A growing body of experimental data has made significant inroads into understanding sex-influenced immune responses. As physicians seek to provide more targeted patient care, it is critical to understand how sex-defining factors (e.g., chromosomes, gonadal hormones) alter immune responses in health and disease. In this review, we highlight recent insights into sex differences in autoimmunity; virus infection, specifically severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; and cancer immunotherapy. A deeper understanding of underlying mechanisms will allow the development of a sex-based approach to disease screening and treatment.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge and Resumption: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The reintroduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after disease progression (rechallenge) or immune-related adverse events (irAEs) recovering (resumption) raises questions in terms of efficacy and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

Here, we reviewed literature data about ICIs rechallenge/resumption in cancer patients along with their clinical characteristics to explore those factors associated with better outcomes. Heterogenous results were pointed out across rechallenge studies with an overall response rate between 0 and 54%, and a progression free survival ranged from 1.5 to 12.9 months and an overall survival between 6.5 and 23.8 months. Better outcomes have been recorded in patients with good ECOG PS, longer duration of initial ICI, discontinuation reason of initial ICI other than progression, and those who received ICI sequence other than the switch between anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1. Studies about ICI resumption highlighted that certain types of irAEs were more likely to relapse at retreatment. These results suggest that ICI rechallenge/resumption can be an interesting strategy for selected patients.

Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Resumption after Interruption for Immune-Related Adverse Events, a Narrative Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for several types of cancer due to their superiority in terms of survival benefits in first- and second-line treatments compared to conventional therapies, and they present a better safety profile (lower absolute number of grade 1-5 adverse events), especially if used in monotherapy. However, the pattern of ICI-related adverse events is totally different, as they are characterized by the development of specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that are unique in terms of the organs involved, onset patterns, and severity. The decision to resume ICI treatment after its interruption due to irAEs is challenged by the need for tumor control versus the risk of occurrence of the same or different irAEs. Studies that specifically assess this point remain scarce, heterogenous and mostly based on small samples of patients or focused only on the recurrence rate of the same irAE after ICI resumption. Moreover, patients with grade ≥3 irAEs were excluded from many of these studies. Herein, we provide a narrative review on the field of safety of ICI resumption after interruption due to irAE(s).

Abdominopelvic FLASH Irradiation Improves PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Preclinical Models of Ovarian Cancer

Treatment of advanced ovarian cancer using PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade shows promise, however current clinical trials are limited by modest response rates. Radiation therapy has been shown to synergize with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in some cancers but has not been utilized in advanced ovarian cancer due to toxicity associated with conventional abdominopelvic irradiation. While ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation has emerged as a strategy to reduce radiation-induced toxicity, the immunomodulatory properties of FLASH irradiation remain unknown. Here we demonstrate that single high dose abdominopelvic FLASH irradiation promoted intestinal regeneration and maintained tumor control in a preclinical mouse model of ovarian cancer. Reduced tumor burden in conventional and FLASH treated mice was associated with an early decrease in intratumoral regulatory T cells and a late increase in cytolytic CD8+ T cells. Compared to conventional irradiation, FLASH irradiation increased intratumoral T cell infiltration at early timepoints. Moreover, FLASH irradiation maintained the ability to increase intratumoral CD8+ T cell infiltration and enhance the efficacy of αPD-1 therapy in preclinical models of ovarian cancer. These data highlight the potential for FLASH irradiation to improve the therapeutic efficacy of checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

A new biological triangle in cancer: intestinal microbiota, immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibiotics

Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many malignant tumors. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can reactivate the anti-tumor activity of immune cells, sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy depends on the complex tumor immune processes. In recent years, numerous researches have demonstrated the role of intestinal microbiota in immunity and metabolism of the tumor microenvironment, as well as the efficacy of immunotherapy. Epidemiological studies have further demonstrated the efficacy of antibiotic therapy on the probability of patients' response to ICIs and predictability of the short-term survival of cancer patients. Disturbance to the intestinal microbiota significantly affects ICIs-mediated immune reconstitution and is considered a possible mechanism underlying the development of adverse effects during antibiotic-based ICIs treatment. Intestinal microbiota, antibiotics, and ICIs have gradually become important considerations for the titer of immunotherapy. In the case of immunotherapy, the rational use of antibiotics and intestinal microbiota is expected to yield a better prognosis for patients with malignant tumors.

Clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and their association with survival

BACKGROUND

Despite the popularity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of advanced cancer, patients often develop gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of GI-irAEs have not been fully elucidated in previous reports. This necessitates the evaluation of the impact of GI-irAEs on patients receiving ICI treatment.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical characteristics of GI-irAEs and their impact on survival in patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, we reviewed the records of 661 patients who received ICIs for various cancers at Nagoya University Hospital from September 2014 to August 2020. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients who received ICI treatment. We also evaluated the correlation between GI-irAE development and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (LC) and malignant melanoma (MM). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the median overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

GI-irAEs occurred in 34 of 605 patients (5.6%) treated with an anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibody alone and in nine of 56 patients (16.1%) treated with an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody alone or a combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. The cumulative incidence and median daily diarrhea frequency were significantly higher in patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 antibodies (P < 0.05). In 130 patients with MM, OS was significantly prolonged in the group that continued ICI treatment despite the development of GI-irAEs compared to the group that did not experience GI-irAEs (P = 0.035). In contrast, in 209 patients with non-small cell LC, there was no significant difference in OS between the groups. The multivariate analyses showed that a performance status of 2-3 (hazard ratio: 2.406; 95% confidence interval: 1.125–5.147; P = 0.024) was an independent predictive factor for OS in patients with MM.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 antibodies develop GI-irAEs more frequently and with higher severity than those receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Continuing ICI treatment in patients with MM with GI-irAEs have better OS.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-associated Diarrhea and Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the management of advanced malignancies but are associated with diarrhea and colitis. The objective of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the incidence and outcomes of ICI-associated diarrhea and colitis. Bibliographic databases were searched through August 13, 2019, for observational studies of ICI therapy reporting the incidence and/or treatment of diarrhea or colitis. The primary outcome was ICI-associated diarrhea and colitis. Meta-analyses were performed with random-effects models. Twenty-five studies (N=12,661) were included. All studies had a high risk of bias in at least 1 domain. The overall incidence of diarrhea/colitis was 12.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.8-18.2, I2=96.5]. The incidence was lower in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (4.1%, 95% CI, 2.6-6.5) than in those treated with anti-cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (20.1%, 95% CI, 15.9-25.1). The remission of diarrhea and/or colitis was higher in patients treated with corticosteroids plus biologics (88.4%, 95% CI, 79.4-93.8) than in those treated with corticosteroids alone (58.3%, 95% CI, 49.3-66.7, Q=18.7, P<0.001). ICI were permanently discontinued in 48.1% of patients (95% CI, 17.8-79.1). ICI were restarted after temporary interruption in 48.6% of patients (95% CI, 18.2-79.4) of whom 17.0% (95% CI, 6.4-30.0) experienced recurrence. Real-world incidence of ICI-associated diarrhea/colitis exceeds 10%. These events lead to permanent ICI discontinuation in just over 50% of patients, while <20% have recurrence of symptoms if ICI are resumed. Further studies are needed to identify patients who would benefit from early treatment with biologics as well as appropriate patients to resume ICI therapy.

Immunotherapy-related gastritis: Two case reports and literature review

Immunotherapy is increasingly defining a role in a wide variety of tumours such that as use becomes more ubiquitous, so too will the complications. A relatively rare complication of immunotherapy use is immune-related gastritis. In this case series, we present two cases of immunotherapy-related gastritis from our institution and undertake a comprehensive review and analysis of the literature around this less common adverse event.

Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis Shows Drug-Specific Differences in Immune Cell Reaction That Overlap With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Predict Response to Colitis Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-associated colitis can limit therapy and has resemblance to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Studies exploring mechanistic similarities between these colitides are limited, yet therapeutic targets for either disorder could emerge from shared pathophysiology.

METHODS

The morphology and inflammatory content of colonic biopsy specimens from anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody-treated patients with CPI colitis were compared with initial biopsy specimens from patients with IBD. Predictors of the need for infliximab were sought in CPI patients.

RESULTS

Biopsy specimens from CPI patients showed significantly lower chronicity scores and similar activity scores compared with patients with IBD. Anti-CTLA-4 and IBD groups showed equivalent CD8, CD4, PD-1, and PD-L1 expression, while FoxP3 scores were lower and CD68 scores were higher in anti-CTLA-4 compared with IBD biopsy specimens. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 group had lower scores for CD8, CD4, and PD-1 and equivalent scores for FoxP3, PD-L1, and CD68 compared with IBD. Anti-CTLA-4 biopsy specimens had higher scores for CD8, PD-1, PD-L1, and CD68 than anti-PD-1/PD-L1 biopsy specimens. CD8/FoxP3 ratios and CD68 scores were higher among CPI patients requiring infliximab therapy for colitis compared with those responding to steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

The proinflammatory immune phenotype of anti-CTLA-4-associated colitis has significant overlap with IBD. CD8/FoxP3 ratios may predict therapeutic response in CPI-associated colitis.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Inflammation Shows Morphologic Similarities to, but Is Immunologically Distinct From, Helicobacter pylori Gastritis and Celiac Disease

CONTEXT.—

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapies are associated with multi-organ immune-related adverse events. Although colonic mucosal changes have been described, inflammatory changes incited by CPIs in the upper gastrointestinal tract have not been well characterized.

OBJECTIVE.—

To investigate morphologic and immunologic changes incited by CPI therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

DESIGN.—

We compared the morphology and immune cell phenotype of gastric and duodenal biopsies from patients treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) or anti-programmed death receptor-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies with biopsies from patients with Helicobacter pylori gastritis, patients with celiac disease, and normal controls.

RESULTS.—

Gastric biopsies from patients on CPIs showed chronic gastritis mimicking H pylori gastritis. However, CPI gastritis demonstrated greater numbers of CD8+ intraepithelial lymphocytes, less lamina propria inflammation, fewer plasma cells and CD20+ B cells, fewer lymphoid aggregates, and reduced CD4:CD8 ratio in both the lamina propria and the epithelial layer. There were no differences between anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 gastritis, except for more lymphoid aggregates in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 gastritis. Duodenal biopsies from patients on CPIs revealed chronic duodenitis with villous blunting, mimicking celiac disease. Compared with celiac disease, CPI duodenitis demonstrated higher prevalence of neutrophilic infiltrates and erosions, increased lamina propria CD3 and CD8 T cells, and reduced CD4:CD8 ratio. Upper gastrointestinal biopsies were more inflamed than concomitant colonic biopsies in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The morphologic and immunophenotypic distinctions between CPI-associated upper gastrointestinal injuries and common infectious and autoimmune diseases may provide useful discriminators when clinicians are confronted with gastric and duodenal inflammatory changes in patients receiving CPI therapy.

Gastrointestinal toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis leveraging VigiBase, the WHO Adverse Drug Reaction Database

With the improvement of people's living standards, gastrointestinal adverse reactions caused by various adverse factors have attracted more and more people's attention. A recent study has indicated that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could also invade the gastrointestinal tract, leading to gastrointestinal adverse reactions (Song et al., 2020). In recent years, immunotherapy has provided certain effects for some patients with advanced malignant tumors. A microencapsulation of immunoglobulin Y (IgY) was reported to provide an effective way to preserve IgY and improve its performance in the gastrointestinal tract (Zhang J et al., 2020). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can significantly improve the survival of some advanced malignant tumors, especially metastatic malignant melanoma and lung cancer (Afzal et al., 2018; Madden and Kasler, 2019). They include anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4) antibodies (ipilimumab and tremelimumab), anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibodies (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab) (Baxi et al., 2018). Previous studies have shown that ICI combination therapy, such as nivolumab plus ipilimumab, has particular efficacy in lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma (Wolchok et al., 2017; Derosa et al., 2018; Doroshow et al., 2019). However, ICIs may also lead to many immune-related adverse events (irAEs), even causing severe complications in certain cases. The most well-established toxicities from ICI therapy are gastrointestinal irAEs, including enteritis, enterocolitis, microscopic colitis, and gastritis, which have attracted public attention in recent years; reports of such events associated with ICI therapy also have increased (Tandon et al., 2018; de Malet et al., 2019). These gastrointestinal irAEs may generally respond well to corticosteroids and infliximab (Haanen et al., 2017). Although most of these irAEs are low-grade, a lack of detection and timely treatment may incur severe or fatal complications.

Gastrointestinal and liver immune-related adverse effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: A descriptive observational study

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective agents against several malignancies. However, they are associated with gastrointestinal and liver immune-related adverse events (GI-IrAEs and LI-IrAEs), which can lead to their temporary or permanent discontinuation.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and gastrointestinal and liver toxicity of ICIs in oncological treatments in actual clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with advanced cancer who received at least 1ICI dose between May 2015 and September 2018 were retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

132 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (65.15%, n=86); melanoma (22.7%, n=30); renal carcinoma (9.09%, n=12); and other tumours (3%, n=4) were included. The treatments administered were nivolumab (n=82), pembrolizumab (n=28), atezolizumab (n=13), durvalumab (n=2), ipilimumab (n=1) and the antiCTLA-4/PD-1 combination (n=6). In total, 51 patients (38.6%) developed IrAEs, 17 (12.9%) of which experienced GI-IrAEs. Of these, 8 (47%) needed steroids and 1patient required surgery due to intestinal perforation. Grade I Li-IrAEs were observed in 4 patients (3.03%): 2 (50%) required corticosteroids and 1 patient had to discontinue treatment. Four patients (66.6%) who received combination therapy experienced GI-IrAEs. IrAE incidence were not associated with age, gender or drug response.

CONCLUSIONS

GI-IrAEs are one of the most common adverse events in patients receiving ICIs. A multidisciplinary approach and a greater understanding of these events could help to reduce morbidity and therapy discontinuation.

ESMO consensus conference recommendations on the management of metastatic melanoma: under the auspices of the ESMO Guidelines Committee

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a consensus conference on melanoma on 5-7 September 2019 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of melanoma. The aim of the conference was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) the management of locoregional disease; (ii) targeted versus immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting; (iii) targeted versus immunotherapies for the first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma; (iv) when to stop immunotherapy or targeted therapy in the metastatic setting; and (v) systemic versus local treatment for brain metastases. The expert panel was divided into five working groups to each address questions relating to one of the five topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the results relating to the management of metastatic melanoma, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced autoimmunity: The impact of gender

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate prevalence and clinical features of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in accordance with the gender of treated cancer patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the medical literature was conducted by searching all available clinical data up to December 2019 in several databases using a combination of MESH terms related to immune checkpoint inhibitors, autoimmunity, and gender. Analyzed data were related to all FDA approved ICIs and respective indications in cancer.

RESULTS

According to data from the literature, male display a slightly lower frequencies of ICIs-related endocrinopathies compared with females, specifically thyroid dysfunction. On the contrary, ICIs-hypophysitis has been reported at higher rates among males compared with females. ICI-induced Sicca/Sjogren's syndrome showed a more frequent occurrence in men than the idiopathic primary form. No differences in gender distribution seem to arise in hematologic and gastrointestinal-irAEs. Interestingly, the gender distribution of neurologic and vascular ICIs-irAEs appears male-dominant.

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review highlights for the first time that the distribution of patients experiencing irAEs associated with ICIs changes among the genders according to the specific drug used, the frequency of the cancer and of the autoimmune conditions in the general population.

Management of Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Enterocolitis: A Systematic Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the treatment of several cancers. These drugs increase T-cell activity and the antitumor immune response but also have immune-related adverse effects that can affect the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. These adverse effects have been observed in 7% to 30% of patients treated with ICIs. As the number of diseases treated with ICIs increases, gastroenterologists will see more patients with ICI-induced GI adverse events. We performed a systematic review of the incidence, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and management of the adverse effects of ICIs on the GI tract. Treatment with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 often causes severe enterocolitis, whereas treatment with inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 have less frequent and more diverse adverse effects. Management of patients with GI adverse effects of ICIs should involve first ruling out other disorders, followed by assessment of severity, treatment with corticosteroids, and rapid introduction of infliximab therapy for nonresponders.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis as a model of autoimmune arthritis

The development of inflammatory arthritis in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is increasingly recognized due to the growing use of these drugs for the treatment of cancer. This represents an important opportunity not only to define the mechanisms responsible for the development of this immune-related adverse event and to ultimately predict or prevent its development, but also to provide a unique window into early events in the development of inflammatory arthritis. Knowledge gained through the study of this patient population, for which the inciting event is known, could shed light into the pathogenesis of autoimmune arthritis. This review will highlight the clinical and immunologic features of these entities to define common elements for future study.

Recognition and management of the gastrointestinal and hepatic immune-related adverse events

Immunotherapy is revolutionizing the treatment paradigm for a broad spectrum of malignancies. However, the immune checkpoint inhibitors also cause a unique set of toxicities. In the digestive system, this has consisted for the most part as colitis and hepatotoxicity, but also include less-common manifestations. Baseline screening, early identification, timely diagnosis, rapid and adequate treatment can significantly minimize the toxicity of immunotherapy and improve prognosis. This article provides a comprehensive review of gastrointestinal and hepatic immune-related toxicities, including incidence, mechanism, clinical manifestation, diagnosis, treatment, and guidelines for resumption of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Immune-Related Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been changing the paradigm of cancer treatment. However, immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) have also increased with the exponential increase in the use of ICIs. ICIs can break up the immunologic homeostasis and reduce T-cell tolerance. Therefore, inhibition of immune checkpoint can lead to the activation of autoreactive T-cells, resulting in various irAEs similar to autoimmune diseases. Gastrointestinal toxicity, endocrine toxicity, and dermatologic toxicity are common side effects. Neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary toxicity are relatively rare but can be fatal. ICI-related gastrointestinal toxicity, dermatologic toxicity, and hypophysitis are more common with anti- CTLA-4 agents. ICI-related pulmonary toxicity, thyroid dysfunction, and myasthenia gravis are more common with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Treatment with systemic steroids is the principal strategy against irAEs. The use of immune-modulatory agents should be considered in case of no response to the steroid therapy. Treatment under the supervision of multidisciplinary specialists is also essential, because the symptoms and treatments of irAEs could involve many organs. Thus, this review focuses on the mechanism, clinical presentation, incidence, and treatment of various irAEs.

Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized treatment and overall survival for several different types of cancer. Antibodies to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and to programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand enhance cytotoxic T-cell survival, thus augmenting antitumor action and consequently inducing immune-related adverse events, of which the most relevant is diarrhea and colitis. This review compiles recent data on pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment of immune-mediated colitis (IMC). The pathogenesis of IMC is not completely understood, but recent studies have focused on the role of regulatory T cells and interactions with the gut microbiome. While sharing similarities with inflammatory bowel disease, IMC is considered a distinct form of colitis with acute onset and rapid progression leading to potential complications including bowel perforation and death. Prompt recognition and management of IMC is imperative for optimal outcomes. Although prospective clinical trials are lacking to guide therapy, recent guidelines recommend early endoscopic evaluation to establish the diagnosis and prompt initiation of corticosteroids. Response to first-line therapy should be assessed early to determine the need of escalation to biologic agents. With treatment, most patients will experience full resolution of symptoms, and subsequent rechallenge with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors can be considered.

Budesonide treatment for microscopic colitis from immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are effective against a variety of malignancies but can be limited by inflammatory toxicities such as enterocolitis. Enterocolitis is typically treated with systemically active glucocorticoids. Endoscopy can stratify patients by the severity of mucosal inflammation, including identifying patients with colitis in the absence of visible mucosal changes: microscopic colitis. Whether patients with CPI microscopic colitis could be managed differently from colitis with more severe mucosal involvement is unclear. The objective of this study was to describe outcomes in CPI microscopic colitis focusing on the response to first line treatment with budesonide.

METHODS

We evaluated data from a retrospective cohort from a single-center large academic hospital. The participants were all adult patients evaluated by endoscopy for suspected CPI enterocolitis between 3/2017 and 3/2019. The exposures were: Mayo Endoscopic Score (range 0-3). The subset was: oral budesonide, maximum dose 12 mg daily, administered minimum of 5 weeks. The main outcomes and measures were: Primary: time from first CPI exposure to first glucocorticoid use; use of systemic glucocorticoids; time from symptom onset to resolution; continuation of CPI therapy; number of additional CPI infusions received. Secondary: admissions for symptom control; novel irAE development; need for second-line immunosuppression; oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 38 patients with biopsy confirmed CPI enterocolitis, 13 in the microscopic colitis cohort, and 25 in the non-microscopic colitis cohort. Budesonide use was higher in the microscopic colitis cohort (12/13 vs 3/25, p < 0.001), and systemic glucocorticoid use was higher in non-microscopic colitis (22/25 vs. 3/13, p < 0.001). Time from symptom onset to resolution did not differ. Microscopic colitis patients more frequently remained on CPI after developing (entero)colitis (76.9% vs 16.0%, p < 0.001). Microscopic colitis patients tolerating further CPI received, on average, 4.2 CPI infusions more than non-microscopic colitis patients tolerating CPI (5.8 vs 1.6, p = 0.03). Microscopic colitis was associated with increased time-to-treatment-failure (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.66) and progression-free survival (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrointestinal mucosal inflammation without visible mucosal injury is a distinct, prevalent CPI enterocolitis subset that can be diagnosed by endoscopy. First-line budesonide appears effective in controlling "microscopic colitis" symptoms and prolonging immunotherapy duration. These findings present a compelling rationale for routine endoscopic evaluation of suspected CPI enterocolitis and suggest an alternative glucocorticoid-sparing treatment strategy for a subset of such patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis persists after immunotherapy cessation

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients who develop immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced inflammatory arthritis (IA), to define factors associated with IA persistence after ICI cessation, the need for immunosuppressants and the impact of these medications on underlying malignancies.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of patients referred for IA associated with ICIs. Patients were recruited from June 2015 to December 2018. Information was obtained at the baseline visit, and follow-up visits occurred at varying intervals for up to 24 months from ICI cessation. Kaplan-Meier curves were developed to characterise IA persistence. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the influence of various factors on IA persistence. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of IA treatment on tumour response.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were monitored with a median follow-up after ICI cessation of 9 months. A majority (53.3%) had active IA at their most recent follow-up. IA was less likely to improve in those with longer duration of ICI use, in those receiving combination ICI therapy, and in patients with multiple other immune-related adverse events. Tumour response did not appear to be impacted by immunosuppression. Although not statistically significant, persistent IA was correlated with a better tumour response (complete or partial response).

CONCLUSION

ICI-induced IA can become a long-term disease necessitating management by rheumatology for immunomodulatory treatment. Importantly, the use of immunomodulatory treatment has not been shown to impact cancer outcomes in this study.

Colitis after checkpoint blockade: A retrospective cohort study of melanoma patients requiring admission for symptom control

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have revolutionized oncologic therapy but can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Corticosteroids are first-line treatment with escalation to biologic immunosuppression in refractory cases. CPI-related gastroenterocolitis (GEC) affects 20%-50% of patients receiving CPIs and can carry significant morbidity and mortality. Severe CPI-related GEC is not well-described. We present the clinical characterization of all CPI-related GEC requiring admission at a single institution.

METHODS

Clinical, laboratory, radiographic, and endoscopic data were extracted from charts of all melanoma patients ≥18 years of age admitted to one institution for CPI-related GEC, from February 5, 2011 to December 13, 2016. Patients were followed until December 31, 2017 for further admissions. Survival, outcomes, and pharmaceutical-use analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Median time-to-admission from initial CPI exposure was 73.5 days. Median length of stay was 4.5 days. About 50.0% required second-line immunosuppression. Readmission for recrudescence occurred in 33.3%. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade was not significantly associated with outcomes. Hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.005), relative lymphopenia (P = 0.027), and decreased lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.026) were associated with second-line immunosuppression. There was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or OS (P = 0.367, 0.400) for second-line immunosuppression. Subgroup analysis showed that early corticosteroid administration (P = 0.045) was associated with decreased PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe CPI-related GEC typically manifests within 3 months of immunotherapy exposure. Rates of second-line immunosuppression and readmission for recrudescence were high. CTCAE grade did not capture the degree of severity in our cohort. Second-line immunosuppression was not associated with poorer oncologic outcomes; however, early corticosteroid exposure was associated with decreased PFS. Further investigation is warranted.