1
|
Schouten TJ, van Goor IWJM, Dorland GA, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, Brosens LAA, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, van Dam RM, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Intven MPW, Kazemier G, Liem MSL, van Lienden KP, Los M, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, van Tienhoven GJ, Verdonk RC, Verkooijen HM, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Daamen LA. The Value of Biological and Conditional Factors for Staging of Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Upfront Resection: A Nationwide Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4956-4965. [PMID: 38386198 PMCID: PMC11236903 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15070-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Novel definitions suggest that resectability status for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) should be assessed beyond anatomical criteria, considering both biological and conditional factors. This has, however, yet to be validated on a nationwide scale. This study evaluated the prognostic value of biological and conditional factors for staging of patients with resectable PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS A nationwide observational cohort study was performed, including all consecutive patients who underwent upfront resection of National Comprehensive Cancer Network resectable PDAC in the Netherlands (2014-2019) with complete information on preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. PDAC was considered biologically unfavorable (RB+) if CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL and favorable (RB-) otherwise. ECOG ≥ 2 was considered conditionally unfavorable (RC+) and favorable otherwise (RC-). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional hazard analysis, presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Overall, 688 patients were analyzed with a median overall survival (OS) of 20 months (95% CI 19-23). OS was 14 months (95% CI 10 months-median not reached) in 20 RB+C+ patients (3%; HR 1.61, 95% CI 0.86-2.70), 13 months (95% CI 11-15) in 156 RB+C- patients (23%; HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.50-2.31), and 21 months (95% CI 12-41) in 47 RB-C+ patients (7%; HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.80-1.62) compared with 24 months (95% CI 22-27) in 465 patients with RB-C- PDAC (68%; reference). CONCLUSIONS Survival after upfront resection of anatomically resectable PDAC is worse in patients with CA19-9 ≥ 500 U/mL, while performance status had no impact. This supports consideration of CA19-9 in preoperative staging of resectable PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs J Schouten
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris W J M van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Galina A Dorland
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+,, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Jan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miyahara S, Takahashi H, Tomimaru Y, Kobayashi S, Sasaki K, Iwagami Y, Yamada D, Akita H, Noda T, Doki Y, Eguchi H. Organ-specific variations in tumor marker dynamics in postoperative pancreatic cancer recurrence: Trends in lung and liver recurrence highlighting biological heterogeneity. Surg Oncol 2024; 55:102103. [PMID: 38986312 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Although tumor recurrence after surgical resection in pancreatic cancer (PC) is generally considered incurable, it is well-accepted that clinical presentations and outcomes vary according to the recurrent sites (e.g., liver vs. lung recurrence), suggesting a possible biological inhomogeneity of PC recurrence. Understanding the behavior of biological factors, specifically tumor markers (TMs), at different recurrence sites may contribute to individualized treatment strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the dynamics of pre-recurrence TMs at liver and lung recurrence sites. METHODS Patients with isolated postoperative liver or lung recurrence as their first recurrence were enrolled. Starting from the recurrence date confirmed by imaging examinations, the values of TMs (carbohydrate antigen 19-9: CA19-9; carcinoembryonic antigen: CEA) were retrospectively evaluated 6 and 3 months before recurrence and at the time of recurrence. RESULTS Patients with liver recurrence displayed a significant increase in CA19-9 and CEA levels from as early as 6 months before recurrence. Contrastingly, patients with lung recurrence demonstrated a significant elevation of CA19-9 levels starting from 3 months before recurrence, with no increase in CEA levels, even at the time of recurrence. The relative change in CA19-9 and CEA levels during each period were significantly lower in patients with lung recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Both TMs exhibited organ-specific variations in patients with postoperative PC recurrence. This disparity may reflect the biological heterogeneity of PC between recurrence patterns, thereby highlighting the importance of conducting postoperative follow-up with consideration of this fact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoru Miyahara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hidenori Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Yoshito Tomimaru
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Kazuki Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Iwagami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Daisaku Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Akita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Takehiro Noda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma F, Zhang B, Wang Y, Lou C. Long Non-Coding RNA AGAP2-AS1: A Comprehensive Overview on Its Biological Functions and Clinical Significances in Human Cancers. Molecules 2024; 29:3461. [PMID: 39124865 PMCID: PMC11314102 DOI: 10.3390/molecules29153461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are well known for their oncogenic or anti-oncogenic roles in cancer development. AGAP2-AS1, a new lncRNA, has been extensively demonstrated as an oncogenic lncRNA in various cancers. Abundant experimental results have proved the aberrantly high level of AGAP2-AS1 in a great number of malignancies, such as glioma, colorectal, lung, ovarian, prostate, breast, cholangiocarcinoma, bladder, colon and pancreatic cancers. Importantly, the biological functions of AGAP2-AS1 have been extensively demonstrated. It could promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of cancer cells. Simultaneously, the clinical significances of AGAP2-AS1 were also illustrated. AGAP2-AS1 was exceptionally overexpressed in various cancer tissues. Clinical studies disclosed that the abnormal overexpression of AGAP2-AS1 was tightly connected with overall survival (OS), lymph nodes metastasis (LNM), clinical stage, tumor infiltration, high histological grade (HG), serous subtype and PFI times. However, to date, the biological actions and clinical significances of AGAP2-AS1 have not been systematically reviewed in human cancers. In the present review, the authors overviewed the biological actions, potential mechanisms and clinical features of AGAP2-AS1 according to the previous studies. In summary, AGAP2-AS1, as a vital oncogenic gene, is a promising biomarker and potential target for carcinoma prognosis and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yiqi Wang
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China; (F.M.); (B.Z.)
| | - Chenghua Lou
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China; (F.M.); (B.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mas L, Castelli C, Coffy A, Tretarre B, Piquemal D, Bachet JB. Nationwide trends over 10 years in epidemiology and management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A real-world study from the French administrative database. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2024; 48:102426. [PMID: 39043316 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Significant progress has been made in the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in recent years. In this population-based study, we aimed to compare incidence, therapeutic strategies, and survival outcomes of PDAC patients in France over a decade. METHODS This study was performed using a nationwide French database. All patients receiving care for PDAC during years 2009, 2014 and 2018 were included. Treatment modalities and survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 8143/8771/10494 patients were considered in 2009/2014/2018, respectively. Incidence increased mainly among patients aged >60 years. In localized PDAC, the proportion of patients receiving best supportive care (BSC) only decreased at 43.6/36.4/32.4 % and 27.8/29.1/34.3 % received chemo(radio)therapy alone. The rate of upfront surgery remained stable while 3/8/18 % of operated patients received neoadjuvant therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 7.0/7.9/8.5 months in the overall population. Among treated patients, 1-year OS was 61.4/67.7/68.8 % and 30.3/36.3/38.8 % for localized and metastatic PDAC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the rising incidence of PDAC. Improved outcomes were seen in localized PDAC, with a wider use of chemotherapy and neoadjuvant strategies, and in treated metastatic patients. A modest survival gain was seen overall, hindered by the still high rate of patients receiving BSC only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léo Mas
- AP-HP, Hépato-Gastroenterology et Digestive Oncology department, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, Paris 75013, France.
| | - Christel Castelli
- AESIO SANTE Department Clinical Research team, Beau Soleil clinic, Montpellier 34070, France
| | - Amandine Coffy
- AESIO SANTE Department Clinical Research team, Beau Soleil clinic, Montpellier 34070, France
| | | | | | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- AP-HP, Hépato-Gastroenterology et Digestive Oncology department, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, Paris 75013, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jung JH, Won SH, Jung K, Lee JS, Lee JC, Kim JW, Yoon YS, Hwang JH, Han HS, Kim J. Analysis of Recent Improvement of Survival Outcomes in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Upfront Surgery. Gut Liver 2024; 18:737-746. [PMID: 38146258 PMCID: PMC11249928 DOI: 10.5009/gnl230303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims : Recently, patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) who underwent resection have exhibited improved survival outcomes, but comprehensive analysis is limited. We analyzed the trends of contributing factors. Methods : Data of patients with resected PC were retrospectively collected from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database and separately at our institution. Cox regression analysis was conducted with the data from our institution a survival prediction score was calculated using the β coefficients. Results : Comparison between the periods 2013-2015 (n=3,255) and 2016-2018 (n=3,698) revealed a difference in the median overall survival (25.9 months vs not reached, p<0.001) when analyzed with the HIRA database which was similar to our single-center data (2013-2015 [n=119] vs 2016-2018 [n=148], 20.9 months vs 32.2 months, p=0.003). Multivariable analyses revealed six factors significantly associated with better OS, and the scores were as follows: age >70 years, 1; elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 at diagnosis, 1; R1 resection, 1; stage N1 and N2, 1 and 3, respectively; no adjuvant treatment, 2; FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel after recurrence, 4; and other chemotherapy or supportive care only after recurrence, 5. The rate of R0 resection (69.7% vs 80.4%), use of adjuvant treatment (63.0% vs 74.3%), and utilization of FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (25.2% vs 47.3%) as palliative chemotherapeutic regimen, all increased between the two time periods, resulting in decreased total survival prediction score (mean: 7.32 vs 6.18, p=0.004). Conclusions : Strict selection of surgical candidates, more use of adjuvant treatment, and adoption of the latest combination regimens for palliative chemotherapy after recurrence were identified as factors of recent improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hyup Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seung Hyun Won
- Division of Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kwangrok Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jun Suh Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jong-Chan Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jin Won Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jin-Hyeok Hwang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jaihwan Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Goor IWJM, Andel PCM, Buijs FS, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, van Dam RM, Festen S, Koerkamp BG, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Kazemier G, Liem MSL, Meijer G, de Meijer VE, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Roos D, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, Wit F, Verdonk RC, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Intven MPW, Daamen LA. Prediction of Isolated Local Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Nationwide Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15664-4. [PMID: 38937412 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15664-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distinguishing postoperative fibrosis from isolated local recurrence (ILR) after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is challenging. A prognostic model that helps to identify patients at risk of ILR can assist clinicians when evaluating patients' postoperative imaging. This nationwide study aimed to develop a clinically applicable prognostic model for ILR after PDAC resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS An observational cohort study was performed, including all patients who underwent PDAC resection in the Netherlands (2014-2019; NCT04605237). On the basis of recurrence location (ILR, systemic, or both), multivariable cause-specific Cox-proportional hazard analysis was conducted to identify predictors for ILR and presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A predictive model was developed using Akaike's Information Criterion, and bootstrapped discrimination and calibration indices were assessed. RESULTS Among 1194/1693 patients (71%) with recurrence, 252 patients (21%) developed ILR. Independent predictors for ILR were resectability status (borderline versus resectable, HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.03-1.96; P = 0.03, and locally advanced versus resectable, HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.68-1.82; P = 0.66), tumor location (head versus body/tail, HR 1.50; 95% CI 1.00-2.25; P = 0.05), vascular resection (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.41-2.45; P < 0.001), perineural invasion (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.01-2.13; P = 0.02), number of positive lymph nodes (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08; P = 0.02), and resection margin status (R1 < 1 mm versus R0 ≥ 1 mm, HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.25-2.14; P < 0.001). Moderate performance (concordance index 0.66) with adequate calibration (slope 0.99) was achieved. CONCLUSIONS This nationwide study identified factors predictive of ILR after PDAC resection. Our prognostic model, available through www.pancreascalculator.com , can be utilized to identify patients with a higher a priori risk of developing ILR, providing important information in patient evaluation and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I W J M van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - P C M Andel
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F S Buijs
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S Festen
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E van der Harst
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - G Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - G Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - D Roos
- Department of Surgery, Renier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - M W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - F Wit
- Department of Surgery, Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, The Netherlands
| | - R C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Imaging Division, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Daamen LA, van Goor IWJM, Groot VP, Andel PCM, Brosens LAA, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, Mohammad NH, Heerkens HD, de Hingh IHJT, Hoogwater F, van Laarhoven HWM, Los M, Meijer GJ, de Meijer VE, Pande R, Roberts KJ, Stoker J, Stommel MWJ, van Tienhoven G, Verdonk RC, Verkooijen HM, Wessels FJ, Wilmink JW, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Intven MPW, Molenaar IQ. Recurrent disease detection after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using a recurrence-focused surveillance strategy (RADAR-PANC): protocol of an international randomized controlled trial according to the Trials within Cohorts design. Trials 2024; 25:401. [PMID: 38902836 PMCID: PMC11188210 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08223-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease recurrence remains one of the biggest concerns in patients after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, most patients experience local and/or distant PDAC recurrence within 2 years. High-level evidence regarding the benefits of recurrence-focused surveillance after PDAC resection is missing, and the impact of early detection and treatment of recurrence on survival and quality of life is unknown. In most European countries, recurrence-focused follow-up after surgery for PDAC is currently lacking. Consequently, guidelines regarding postoperative surveillance are based on expert opinion and other low-level evidence. The recent emergence of more potent local and systemic treatment options for PDAC recurrence has increased interest in early diagnosis. To determine whether early detection and treatment of recurrence can lead to improved survival and quality of life, we designed an international randomized trial. METHODS This randomized controlled trial is nested within an existing prospective cohort in pancreatic cancer centers in the Netherlands (Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project; PACAP) and the United Kingdom (UK) (Pancreas Cancer: Observations of Practice and survival; PACOPS) according to the "Trials within Cohorts" (TwiCs) design. All PACAP/PACOPS participants with a macroscopically radical resection (R0-R1) of histologically confirmed PDAC, who provided informed consent for TwiCs and participation in quality of life questionnaires, are included. Participants randomized to the intervention arm are offered recurrence-focused surveillance, existing of clinical evaluation, serum cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 testing, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of chest and abdomen every three months during the first 2 years after surgery. Participants in the control arm of the study will undergo non-standardized clinical follow-up, generally consisting of clinical follow-up with imaging and serum tumor marker testing only in case of onset of symptoms, according to local practice in the participating hospital. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include quality of life, patterns of recurrence, compliance to and costs of recurrence-focused follow-up, and the impact on recurrence-focused treatment. DISCUSSION The RADAR-PANC trial will be the first randomized controlled trial to generate high level evidence for the current clinical equipoise regarding the value of recurrence-focused postoperative surveillance with serial tumor marker testing and routine imaging in patients after PDAC resection. The Trials within Cohort design allows us to study the acceptability of recurrence-focused surveillance among cohort participants and increases the generalizability of findings to the general population. While it is strongly encouraged to offer all trial participants treatment at time of recurrence diagnosis, type and timing of treatment will be determined through shared decision-making. This might reduce the potential survival benefits of recurrence-focused surveillance, although insights into the impact on patients' quality of life will be obtained. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04875325 . Registered on May 6, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Division of Imaging, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - I W J M van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
| | - V P Groot
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - P C M Andel
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - L A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein & Meander Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein & Meander Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H D Heerkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - F Hoogwater
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein & Meander Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G J Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - V E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R Pande
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - K J Roberts
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Stoker
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - G van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F J Wessels
- Department of Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Medical Oncology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - M P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wismans LV, Suurmeijer JA, van Dongen JC, Bonsing BA, Van Santvoort HC, Wilmink JW, van Tienhoven G, de Hingh IH, Lips DJ, van der Harst E, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Bosscha K, Stommel MW, Festen S, den Dulk M, Nuyttens JJ, Intven MPW, de Vos-Geelen J, Molenaar IQ, Busch OR, Koerkamp BG, Besselink MG, van Eijck CHJ. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy but not chemotherapy is associated with reduced risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a nationwide analysis. Surgery 2024; 175:1580-1586. [PMID: 38448277 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula remains the leading cause of significant morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has been described to reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula, but randomized trials on neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma focus increasingly on preoperative chemotherapy rather than preoperative chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy on postoperative pancreatic fistula and other pancreatic-specific surgery related complications on a nationwide level. METHODS All patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were included in the mandatory nationwide prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014-2020). Baseline and treatment characteristics were compared between immediate surgery, preoperative chemotherapy, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The relationship between preoperative chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C) was investigated using multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Overall, 2,019 patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were included, of whom 1,678 underwent immediate surgery (83.1%), 192 (9.5%) received preoperative chemotherapy, and 149 (7.4%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 8.3% of patients after immediate surgery, 4.2% after preoperative chemotherapy, and 2.0% after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (P = .004). In multivariable analysis, the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with reduced risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.69; P = .033) compared with immediate surgery, whereas preoperative chemotherapy was not (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.25; P = .199). Intraoperatively hard, or fibrotic pancreatic texture was most frequently observed after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (53% immediate surgery, 62% preoperative chemotherapy, 77% preoperative chemoradiotherapy, P < .001). CONCLUSION This nationwide analysis demonstrated that in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, only preoperative chemoradiotherapy, but not preoperative chemotherapy, was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonoor V Wismans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Annelie Suurmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle C van Dongen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C Van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn W Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.twitter.com/MarcBesselink
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhuang J, Wang S, Wang Y, Wu Y, Hu R. Prognostic significance of preoperative lymphocytes, albumin, and neutrophils (LANR) index in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:568. [PMID: 38714979 PMCID: PMC11075219 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12329-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The index composed of preoperative lymphocytes, albumin, and neutrophils (LANR), a new composite score based on inflammatory response and nutritional status, has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of multiple types of cancer, but the role of LANR in the prognosis of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has not yet been elucidated. PATIENTS AND METHODS The data of 142 patients with PDAC who underwent radical resection in the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the optimal cut-off values for these parameters, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of LANR in predicting survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survival curves. Log rank test was used for univariate analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off value of LANR was 18.145, and a low preoperative LANR was significantly correlated with the location of the tumor (p = 0.047). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor differentiation degree (HR:2.357, 95%CI:1.388-4.003,p = 0.002), lymph node metastasis (HR:1.755, 95%CI: 1.115-2.763, p = 0.015), TNM stage (HR:4.686, 95%CI: 2.958-7.425, p < 0.001), preoperative cancer antigen 19 - 9 levels (HR:1.001, 95%CI: 1.000-1.001, p < 0.001) and preoperative LANR (HR:0.221, 95%CI: 0.111-0.441, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in patients undergoing radical resection of PDAC. CONCLUSION This study found that preoperative LANR can be used to assess the prognosis of radical resection in patients with PDAC; those with low preoperative LANR had a worse outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaru Zhuang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jiangnan University Medical Center (Wuxi No People's Hospital), 68 Zhongshan Road, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214000, China
| | - Shan Wang
- Human reproductive medicine center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, 1000 Hefeng Road, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214026, China
| | - Yuan Wang
- Human reproductive medicine center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, 1000 Hefeng Road, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214026, China
| | - Yibo Wu
- Human reproductive medicine center, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, 1000 Hefeng Road, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214026, China.
| | - Renjing Hu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jiangnan University Medical Center (Wuxi No People's Hospital), 68 Zhongshan Road, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Carvalho TMA, Audero MM, Greco MR, Ardone M, Maggi T, Mallamaci R, Rolando B, Arpicco S, Ruffinatti FA, Pla AF, Prevarskaya N, Koltai T, Reshkin SJ, Cardone RA. Tumor Microenvironment Modulates Invadopodia Activity of Non-Selected and Acid-Selected Pancreatic Cancer Cells and Its Sensitivity to Gemcitabine and C18-Gemcitabine. Cells 2024; 13:730. [PMID: 38727266 PMCID: PMC11083398 DOI: 10.3390/cells13090730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease with high mortality due to early metastatic dissemination and high chemoresistance. All these factors are favored by its extracellular matrix (ECM)-rich microenvironment, which is also highly hypoxic and acidic. Gemcitabine (GEM) is still the first-line therapy in PDAC. However, it is quickly deaminated to its inactive metabolite. Several GEM prodrugs have emerged to improve its cytotoxicity. Here, we analyzed how the acidic/hypoxic tumor microenvironment (TME) affects the response of PDAC cell death and invadopodia-mediated ECM proteolysis to both GEM and its C18 prodrug. METHODS For this, two PDAC cell lines, PANC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 were adapted to pHe 6.6 or not for 1 month, grown as 3D organotypic cultures and exposed to either GEM or C18 in the presence and absence of acidosis and the hypoxia inducer, deferoxamine. RESULTS We found that C18 has higher cytotoxic and anti-invadopodia activity than GEM in all culture conditions and especially in acid and hypoxic environments. CONCLUSIONS We propose C18 as a more effective approach to conventional GEM in developing new therapeutic strategies overcoming PDAC chemoresistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago M. A. Carvalho
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy; (T.M.A.C.); (M.R.G.); (M.A.); (T.M.); (R.M.); (S.J.R.)
| | - Madelaine Magalì Audero
- U1003 PHYCEL Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire, Inserm, University of Lille, 59000 Lille, France; (M.M.A.); (A.F.P.); (N.P.)
| | - Maria Raffaella Greco
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy; (T.M.A.C.); (M.R.G.); (M.A.); (T.M.); (R.M.); (S.J.R.)
| | - Marilena Ardone
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy; (T.M.A.C.); (M.R.G.); (M.A.); (T.M.); (R.M.); (S.J.R.)
| | - Teresa Maggi
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy; (T.M.A.C.); (M.R.G.); (M.A.); (T.M.); (R.M.); (S.J.R.)
| | - Rosanna Mallamaci
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy; (T.M.A.C.); (M.R.G.); (M.A.); (T.M.); (R.M.); (S.J.R.)
| | - Barbara Rolando
- Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, 10125 Turin, Italy; (B.R.); (S.A.)
| | - Silvia Arpicco
- Department of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, 10125 Turin, Italy; (B.R.); (S.A.)
| | - Federico Alessandro Ruffinatti
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Angiogenesis, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Fiorio Pla
- U1003 PHYCEL Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire, Inserm, University of Lille, 59000 Lille, France; (M.M.A.); (A.F.P.); (N.P.)
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Angiogenesis, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, 10123 Turin, Italy;
| | - Natalia Prevarskaya
- U1003 PHYCEL Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire, Inserm, University of Lille, 59000 Lille, France; (M.M.A.); (A.F.P.); (N.P.)
| | - Tomas Koltai
- Hospital del Centro Gallego de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 2199, Argentina;
| | - Stephan J. Reshkin
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy; (T.M.A.C.); (M.R.G.); (M.A.); (T.M.); (R.M.); (S.J.R.)
| | - Rosa Angela Cardone
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy; (T.M.A.C.); (M.R.G.); (M.A.); (T.M.); (R.M.); (S.J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mackay TM, Latenstein AEJ, Augustinus S, van der Geest LG, Bogte A, Bonsing BA, Cirkel GA, Hol L, Busch OR, den Dulk M, van Driel LMJ, Festen S, de Groot DJA, de Groot JWB, Groot Koerkamp B, Haj Mohammad N, Haver JT, van der Harst E, de Hingh IH, Homs MYV, Los M, Luelmo SAC, de Meijer VE, Mekenkamp L, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Quispel R, Römkens TEH, van Santvoort HC, Stommel MW, Venneman NG, Verdonk RC, van Vilsteren FGI, de Vos-Geelen J, van Werkhoven CH, van Hooft JE, van Eijck CHJ, Wilmink JW, van Laarhoven HWM, Besselink MG. Implementation of Best Practices in Pancreatic Cancer Care in the Netherlands: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:429-437. [PMID: 38353966 PMCID: PMC10867778 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Importance Implementation of new cancer treatment strategies as recommended by evidence-based guidelines is often slow and suboptimal. Objective To improve the implementation of guideline-based best practices in the Netherlands in pancreatic cancer care and assess the impact on survival. Design, setting, and participants This multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial compared enhanced implementation of best practices with usual care in consecutive patients with all stages of pancreatic cancer. It took place from May 22, 2018 through July 9, 2020. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2022, through February 1, 2023. It included all patients in the Netherlands with pathologically or clinically diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study reports 1-year follow-up (or shorter in case of deceased patients). Intervention The 5 best practices included optimal use of perioperative chemotherapy, palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), referral to a dietician, and use of metal stents in patients with biliary obstruction. A 6-week implementation period was completed, in a randomized order, in all 17 Dutch networks for pancreatic cancer care. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included adherence to best practices and quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] global health score). Results Overall, 5887 patients with pancreatic cancer (median age, 72.0 [IQR, 64.0-79.0] years; 50% female) were enrolled, 2641 before and 2939 after implementation of best practices (307 during wash-in period). One-year survival was 24% vs 23% (hazard ratio, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.88-1.08). There was no difference in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (11% vs 11%), adjuvant chemotherapy (48% vs 51%), and referral to a dietician (59% vs 63%), while the use of palliative chemotherapy (24% vs 30%; odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.74), PERT (34% vs 45%; OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.28-2.11), and metal biliary stents increased (74% vs 83%; OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.13-2.80). The EORTC global health score did not improve (area under the curve, 43.9 vs 42.8; median difference, -1.09, 95% CI, -3.05 to 0.94). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, implementation of 5 best practices in pancreatic cancer care did not improve 1-year survival and quality of life. The finding that most patients received no tumor-directed treatment paired with the poor survival highlights the need for more personalized treatment options. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03513705.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara M. Mackay
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk E. J. Latenstein
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simone Augustinus
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lydia G. van der Geest
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Auke Bogte
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A. Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Geert A. Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R. Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- NUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Germany, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce T. Haver
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of nutrition and dietetics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vincent E. de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie Mekenkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Tessa E. H. Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Niels G. Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Robert C. Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - C. Henri van Werkhoven
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E. van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johanna W. Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mikalsen IM, Breder S, Medhus AW, Folseraas T, Aabakken L, Ånonsen KV. ERCP for the initial management of malignant biliary obstruction - real world data on 596 procedures. Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59:369-377. [PMID: 37994406 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2282375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate outcomes of ERCP as first-line management in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) of all causes and stages, reflecting a real-life setting. METHODS Retrospective observational study of patients with ERCP as the first-line management of MBO at Oslo University Hospital between 2015 and 2021. Primary outcome measure was a ≥ 50% decrease from the pre-procedural bilirubin within 30 days after ERCP. Secondary outcome measures were technical success of ERCP, complications and overall mortality. RESULTS A total of 596 patients were included, median age 70 years. ASA score was ≥ III in 67% of patients. The most common cancers causing MBO were pancreatic cancer (52%), metastatic lesions (20%) and cholangiocarcinoma (16%). The primary outcome measure was achieved in 62% of patients. With endoscopic access, overall technical success was 80% with 85% for the distal extrahepatic group, 71% for the perihilar, 40% for the intrahepatic and 53% for multiple level MBOs. Reinterventions were performed in 27% of the patients. Complications occurred in 15% of the patients, including post-ERCP pancreatitis in 9%. Most complications were of minor/moderate severity (81%). Overall mortality was 33% within the first 90 days. Patients deceased by the end of the study period (83%) had median survival of 146 days (range 1-2,582 days). CONCLUSIONS ERCP has a high rate of clinical effect and technical success in the management of both distal extrahepatic and perihilar MBO. Our data indicate that ERCP is a valid option in the first-line management of MBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I M Mikalsen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Breder
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - A W Medhus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - T Folseraas
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - L Aabakken
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - K V Ånonsen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Riviere D, Aarntzen E, van Geenen E, Chang D, de Geus-Oei LF, Brosens L, van Laarhoven K, Gotthardt M, Hermans J. Qualitative flow metabolic phenotype of pancreatic cancer. A new prognostic biomarker? HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:389-399. [PMID: 38114400 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retrospective analysis to investigate the relationship between the flow-metabolic phenotype and overall survival (OS) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its potential clinical utility. METHODS Patients with histopathologically proven PDAC between 2005 and 2014 using tumor attenuation on routine pre-operative CECT as a surrogate for the vascularity and [18F]FDG-uptake as a surrogate for metabolic activity on [18F]FDG-PET. RESULTS In total, 93 patients (50 male, 43 female, median age 63) were included. Hypoattenuating PDAC with high [18F]FDG-uptake has the poorest prognosis (median OS 7 ± 1 months), compared to hypoattenuating PDAC with low [18F]FDG-uptake (median OS 11 ± 3 months; p = 0.176), iso- or hyperattenuating PDAC with high [18F]FDG-uptake (median OS 15 ± 5 months; p = 0.004) and iso- or hyperattenuating PDAC with low [18F]FDG-uptake (median OS 23 ± 4 months; p = 0.035). In multivariate analysis, surgery combined with tumor differentiation, tumor stage, systemic therapy and flow metabolic phenotype remained independent predictors for overall survival. DISCUSSION The novel qualitative flow-metabolic phenotype of PDAC using a combination of CECT and [18F]FDG-PET features, predicted significantly worse survival for hypoattenuating-high uptake pancreatic cancers compared to the other phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniece Riviere
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Erik Aarntzen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Erwin van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - David Chang
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom; West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk Brosens
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kees van Laarhoven
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Gotthardt
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - John Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Goor IW, Schouten TJ, Verburg DN, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, Brosens LA, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, van Dam RM, Festen S, Koerkamp BG, van der Harst E, de Hingh IH, Intven MP, Kazemier G, Los M, Meijer GJ, de Meijer VE, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Roos D, Schreinemakers JM, Stommel MW, Verdonk RC, van Santvoort HC, Daamen LA, Molenaar IQ. Predicting Long-term Disease-free Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Ann Surg 2024; 279:132-137. [PMID: 37450706 PMCID: PMC10727199 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a prediction model for long-term (≥5 years) disease-free survival (DFS) after the resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). BACKGROUND Despite high recurrence rates, ~10% of patients have long-term DFS after PDAC resection. A model to predict long-term DFS may aid individualized prognostication and shared decision-making. METHODS This nationwide cohort study included all consecutive patients who underwent PDAC resection in the Netherlands (2014-2016). The best-performing prognostic model was selected by Cox-proportional hazard analysis and Akaike's Information Criterion, presented by hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Internal validation was performed, and discrimination and calibration indices were assessed. RESULTS In all, 836 patients with a median follow-up of 67 months (interquartile range 51-79) were analyzed. Long-term DFS was seen in 118 patients (14%). Factors predictive of long-term DFS were low preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (logarithmic; HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.10-1.32), no vascular resection (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12-1.58), T1 or T2 tumor stage (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.14-2.04, and HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.98-1.39, respectively), well/moderate tumor differentiation (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.22-1.68), absence of perineural and lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.11-1.81 and HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.96-1.36, respectively), N0 or N1 nodal status (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.54-2.40, and HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.11-1.60, respectively), R0 resection margin status (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.07-1.46), no major complications (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.97-1.35) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.74; 95% CI 1.47-2.06). Moderate performance (concordance index 0.68) with adequate calibration (slope 0.99) was achieved. CONCLUSIONS The developed prediction model, readily available at www.pancreascalculator.com, can be used to estimate the probability of long-term DFS after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris W.J.M. van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thijs J. Schouten
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Daphne N. Verburg
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A. Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A.A. Brosens
- Department of Pathology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert A. Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Martijn P.W. Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Gert J. Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent E. de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Daphne Roos
- Department of Surgery, Renier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W.J. Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Robert C. Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lois A. Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Imaging Division, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van ‘t Land FR, Aziz MH, Michiels N, Mieog JSD, Bonsing BA, Luelmo SA, Homs MY, Groot Koerkamp B, Papageorgiou G, van Eijck CH. Increasing Systemic Immune-inflammation Index During Treatment in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer is Associated With Poor Survival: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:1018-1023. [PMID: 37010512 PMCID: PMC10631500 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A high systemic immune-inflammation index (SIII) at diagnosis of various cancers, including pancreatic cancer, is associated with poor prognosis. The impact of FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy on this index is unknown. In addition, the prognostic value of changes in the SIII during treatment is unclear. In this retrospective analysis, we aimed to find answers regarding patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy alone or with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy between 2015 and 2021 in 2 tertiary referral centers were included. Baseline characteristics, laboratory values at 3 time points during treatment, and survival outcomes were collected. The patient-specific evolutions of SIII and their association with mortality were assessed with joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data. RESULTS Data of 141 patients were analyzed. At a median follow-up time of 23.0 months (95% CI: 14.6-31.3), 97 (69%) patients had died. Median overall survival was 13.2 months (95% CI: 11.0-15.5). During treatment with FOLFIRINOX, the log (SIII) was reduced by -0.588 (95% CI: -0.0978, -0.197; P = 0.003). One unit increase in log (SIII) increased the hazard ratio of dying by 1.604 (95% CI: 1.068-2.409; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS In addition to carbohydrate antigen 19-9, the SIII is a reliable biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammad H. Aziz
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nynke Michiels
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J. Sven D. Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A. Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia A.C. Luelmo
- Department of Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y.V. Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Grigorios Papageorgiou
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zwart ES, van Ee T, Affandi AJ, Boyd LNC, Rodriguez E, den Haan JMM, Farina A, van Grieken NCT, Meijer LL, van Kooyk Y, Mebius RE, Kazemier G. Spatial immune composition of tumor microenvironment in patients with pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2023; 72:4385-4397. [PMID: 37938368 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-023-03573-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
This study examined the composition of the immune microenvironment at different sites within resected pancreas specimens from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Therefore, single-cell suspensions were made from fresh tumor and non-tumorous tissue. Fourteen patients were included from whom twelve PDAC and five non-tumorous samples were obtained. These samples were analyzed with a nineteen marker panel on the Aurora spectral flow cytometer. Furthermore, slides from formalin-fixed paraffine PDACs of eight additional patients were stained with eight markers and analyzed by multispectral imaging. These corresponded to central tumor, periphery of the tumor, i.e., invasive front and resected lymph node and were divided into tumor and adjacent tissue. In the single-cell suspension, a decreased ratio between lymphoid and myeloid cells and between M1 and M2 macrophages was observed in the tumor tissue compared to non-tumorous tissue. Furthermore, an increase in CD169 + macrophages in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy was found. Using immunofluorescence, more macrophages compared to T cells were observed, as well as a lower ratio of CD8 to M2 macrophage, a higher ratio of CD4-CD8 T cells and a higher ratio of immune-suppressive cells to pro-inflammatory cells in the PDAC area compared to the adjacent non-tumorous tissue. Finally, there were more immune-suppressive cells in the central tumor area compared to the invasive front. In conclusion, we show a gradient in the immune-suppressive environment in PDAC from most suppressive in the central tumor to least suppressive in distant non-tumorous tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline S Zwart
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas van Ee
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Cancer Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alsya J Affandi
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Cancer Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lenka N C Boyd
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernesto Rodriguez
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Cancer Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joke M M den Haan
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Cancer Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arantza Farina
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C T van Grieken
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura L Meijer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette van Kooyk
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Cancer Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reina E Mebius
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Cancer Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Conroy T, Pfeiffer P, Vilgrain V, Lamarca A, Seufferlein T, O'Reilly EM, Hackert T, Golan T, Prager G, Haustermans K, Vogel A, Ducreux M. Pancreatic cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:987-1002. [PMID: 37678671 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- T Conroy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy; APEMAC, équipe MICS, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - P Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - V Vilgrain
- Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation U 1149, Université Paris Cité, Paris; Department of Radiology, Beaujon Hospital, APHP Nord, Clichy, France
| | - A Lamarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - T Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - E M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - T Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Golan
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - G Prager
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - K Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - M Ducreux
- Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm Unité Dynamique des Cellules Tumorales, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jeong H, Lim SY, Jeon HJ, Yoon SJ, Kim H, Han IW, Heo JS, Shin SH. Prognosis of pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with propensity score matched analysis. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2655-2663. [PMID: 37658597 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective study investigates factors affecting surgical and oncological outcome after performing pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarian patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS From January 2009 to December 2018, patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were included. Data were analysed by comparing clinicopathological characteristics, complications, survival, recurrence, adjuvant treatment between octogenarians and the younger group. Propensity score matched analysis was performed due to the small size of the octogenarian group. RESULTS A total of 666 patients were included in this study and 24 (3.6%) were included in the octogenarian group. Short term complication rates (P = 0.119) and hospital stay (P = 0.839) did not differ between two groups. Overall survival between the two groups showed significant difference (<80 median 25 months versus ≥80 median 13 months, P = 0.045). However, after propensity score matched analysis, the two groups did not differ in overall survival (<80 median 18 months versus ≥80 median survival 16 months, P = 0.565) or disease-free survival (P = 0.471). Among the octogenarians, six patients survived longer than 24 months even without satisfying all favourable prognostic factors. CONCLUSION Considering the general condition of octogenarians diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, select patients should be treated more aggressively for the best chance of receiving curative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HyeJeong Jeong
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Soo Yeun Lim
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Jeong Jeon
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - So Jeong Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hongbeom Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - In Woong Han
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Seok Heo
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Shin
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ponzini FM, Schultz CW, Leiby BE, Cannaday S, Yeo T, Posey J, Bowne WB, Yeo C, Brody JR, Lavu H, Nevler A. Repurposing the FDA-approved anthelmintic pyrvinium pamoate for pancreatic cancer treatment: study protocol for a phase I clinical trial in early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073839. [PMID: 37848297 PMCID: PMC10582846 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent reports of the utilisation of pyrvinium pamoate (PP), an FDA-approved anti-helminth, have shown that it inhibits pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell growth and proliferation in-vitro and in-vivo in preclinical models. Here, we report about an ongoing phase I open-label, single-arm, dose escalation clinical trial to determine the safety and tolerability of PP in PDAC surgical candidates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In a 3+3 dose design, PP is initiated 3 days prior to surgery. The first three patients will be treated with the initial dose of PP at 5 mg/kg orally for 3 days prior to surgery. Dose doubling will be continued to a reach a maximum of 20 mg/kg orally for 3 days, if the previous two dosages (5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) were tolerated. Dose-limiting toxicity grade≥3 is used as the primary endpoint. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile of PP and bioavailability in humans will be used as the secondary objective. Each participant will be monitored weekly for a total of 30 days from the final dose of PP for any side effects. The purpose of this clinical trial is to examine whether PP is safe and tolerable in patients with pancreatic cancer, as well as assess the drug's PK/PD profile in plasma and fatty tissue. Potential implications include the utilisation of PP in a synergistic manner with chemotherapeutics for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the Thomas Jefferson Institutional Review Board. The protocol number for this study is 20F.041 (Version 3.1 as of 27 October 2021). The data collected and analysed from this study will be used to present at local and national conferences, as well as, written into peer-reviewed manuscript publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05055323.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca M Ponzini
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Benjamin E Leiby
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Division of Biostatistics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shawnna Cannaday
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - T Yeo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Jefferson Pancreatic, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James Posey
- Jefferson Pancreatic, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wilbur B Bowne
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Jefferson Pancreatic, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Charles Yeo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Jefferson Pancreatic, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jonathan R Brody
- Brenden Colson Center for Pancreatic Care; Departments of Surgery and Cell, Developmental & Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Harish Lavu
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Jefferson Pancreatic, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Avinoam Nevler
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Jefferson Pancreatic, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li H, Guo Y, Sun X, Lu Y, Chang S, Wang X, Gao S, Gao C, Zhao T. Comparison of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, S-1 and gemcitabine chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer: a real-world study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1276037. [PMID: 37909023 PMCID: PMC10613992 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1276037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A survival benefit has been seen for both adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) and S-1 chemotherapy compared to gemcitabine (GEM) for resectable pancreatic cancer in the APACT (2019) and JASPAC01 trials (2016), respectively. However, supporting evidence regarding the effectiveness of AG or S-1 compared to gemcitabine in real-world clinical practice remains lacking. Methods Our study included all 246 pancreatic cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment and received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with AG, S-1, or GEM except for those meeting exclusion criteria (R2 resection, neoadjuvant therapy, or synchronous malignancy) at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from June 2015 to July 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results In total, 246 patients were included, of whom 54(22%) received adjuvant AG, 103(41%) received adjuvant S-1, and 89(37%) received adjuvant GEM. Adjuvant S-1 was associated with a prolonged OS compared to GEM (median OS S-1 vs GEM: 27.0 vs 20.0 months; HR: 0.65, P = .016) and a significantly prolonged RFS compared to GEM (median RFS S-1 vs GEM: 20.0 vs 8.2 months; HR: 0.58, P = .002). After adjusting for known prognostic factors in multivariate Cox regression analysis, this survival benefit persists and is consistent in most subgroups in our subgroup analysis. However, no statistically significant differences in OS or RFS were seen between patients treated with AG and patients treated with GEM. Conclusions In this retrospective real-world study, adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy was associated with improved survival compared to GEM while no differences in OS or RFS were observed for AG compared to GEM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haorui Li
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yu Guo
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xugang Sun
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Lu
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Shaofei Chang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Pancreatic Surgery, Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiuchao Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Song Gao
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Chuntao Gao
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Tiansuo Zhao
- Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pedrazzoli S. Currently Debated Topics on Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Narrative Review on Surgical Treatment of Borderline Resectable, Locally Advanced, and Synchronous or Metachronous Oligometastatic Tumor. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6461. [PMID: 37892599 PMCID: PMC10607532 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previously considered inoperable patients (borderline resectable, locally advanced, synchronous oligometastatic or metachronous pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC)) are starting to become resectable thanks to advances in chemo/radiotherapy and the reduction in operative mortality. METHODS This narrative review presents a chosen literature selection, giving a picture of the current state of treatment of these patients. RESULTS Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is generally recognized as the treatment of choice before surgery. However, despite the increased efficacy, the best pathological response is still limited to 10.9-27.9% of patients. There are still limited data on the selection of possible NAT responders and how to diagnose non-responders early. Multidetector computed tomography has high sensitivity and low specificity in evaluating resectability after NAT, limiting the resection rate of resectable patients. Ca 19-9 and Positron emission tomography are giving promising results. The prediction of early recurrence after a radical resection of synchronous or metachronous metastatic PDAC, thus identifying patients with poor prognosis and saving them from a resection of little benefit, is still ongoing, although some promising data are available. CONCLUSION In conclusion, high-level evidence demonstrating the benefit of the surgical treatment of such patients is still lacking and should not be performed outside of high-volume centers with interdisciplinary teams of surgeons and oncologists.
Collapse
|
22
|
Sindayigaya R, Barat M, Tzedakis S, Dautry R, Dohan A, Belle A, Coriat R, Soyer P, Fuks D, Marchese U. Modified Appleby procedure for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A primer for the radiologist. Diagn Interv Imaging 2023; 104:455-464. [PMID: 37301694 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most prevalent pancreatic neoplasm accounting for more than 90% of pancreatic malignancies. Surgical resection with adequate lymphadenectomy remains the only available curative strategy for patients with PDAC. Despite improvements in both chemotherapy regimen and surgical care, body/neck PDAC still conveys a poor prognosis because of the vicinity of major vascular structures, including celiac trunk, which favors insidious disease spread at the time of diagnosis. Body/neck PDAC involving the celiac trunk is considered locally advanced PDAC in most guidelines and therefore not eligible for upfront resection. However, a more aggressive surgical approach (i.e., distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and en-bloc celiac trunk resection [DP-CAR]) was recently proposed to offer hope for cure in selected patients with locally advanced body/neck PDAC responsive to induction therapy at the cost of higher morbidity. The so-called "modified Appleby procedure" is highly demanding and requires optimal preoperative staging as well as appropriate patient preparation for surgery (i.e., preoperative arterial embolization). Herein, we review current evidence regarding DP-CAR indications and outcomes as well as the critical role of diagnostic and interventional radiology in patient preparation before DP-CAR, and early identification and management of DP-CAR complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémy Sindayigaya
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France.
| | - Maxime Barat
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Raphael Dautry
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Arthur Belle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Soyer
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Oluwasanmi A, Lindsay S, Curtis A, Perrie Y, Hoskins C. Chain length impact on the retro Diels-Alder mediated release of gemcitabine from hybrid nanoparticles towards pancreatic cancer therapy. Int J Pharm 2023; 644:123304. [PMID: 37572860 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
Previously reported gold coated iron oxide nanoparticles (Au-IONP's) have demonstrated their effectiveness as drug delivery vehicles for gemcitabine conjugated to a thermally labile Diels-Alder linker containing a chain of 4 carbon atoms (TTLD4) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Heat generated via laser irradiation of Au-IONPs facilitated retro Diels-Alder mediated release in a burst release profile where approximately half of all total release over 180 min occurred within the first 5 min. Two analogues of TTLD4, which differ only in linker chain length (TTLD3 & TTLD6) were synthesised and conjugated to Au-IONP's. Heat-mediated release of gemcitabine at 45 °C over 180 min from these formulations was confirmed to be based on linker length, which was 94%, 76% and 45% for TTLD3, TTLD4 and TTLD6, respectively. Drug loading of the Diels-Alder linkers in a 5:1 Drug/Au-IONP w/w ratio appears to favour those containing an even number of carbons TTLD4 (76%) & TTLD6 (57%) over TTLD3 (25%), possibly due to the linker likely being positioned perpendicular to the Au-IONP surface because of the 120 °C-C bond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeolu Oluwasanmi
- Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK
| | - Sarah Lindsay
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
| | - Anthony Curtis
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK
| | - Yvonne Perrie
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
| | - Clare Hoskins
- Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Imaoka H, Ikeda M, Umemoto K, Sunakawa Y, Ueno M, Ueno H, Ozaka M, Kuwahara T, Okano N, Kanai M, Hisano T, Suzuki Y, Asagi A, Shioji K, Todaka A, Tsuji K, Ikezawa K, Miki I, Komatsu Y, Akutsu N, Yamashita T, Okuyama H, Furuse J, Nagano H. Comprehensive review of undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas: from epidemiology to treatment. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:764-773. [PMID: 37325968 PMCID: PMC10473279 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) of the pancreas is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer displaying no definitive direction of differentiation. UC has been reported as a highly aggressive malignant neoplasm, with a median overall survival of <1 year, except for several surgical series. On the other hand, UC tissue sometimes contains non-neoplastic osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs), and such cases have been reported to have relatively longer survival. Thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification histologically distinguishes UC with OGCs (UCOGCs) from UC, and UCs were subclassified into three subtypes: anaplastic UC, sarcomatoid UC and carcinosarcoma. However, still less is known about UC due to its rarity, and such situations lead to further difficulties in treatment for UC. To date, only surgical resection can offer curative treatment for patients with UC, and no clear evidence for chemotherapy exists for them. However, a retrospective cohort study and case reports showed that relatively promising results paclitaxel-containing regimens for treatment of patients with unresectable UC. Furthermore, high programmed cell death protein 1 expression has been reported in sarcomatoid UCs and UCOGCs, and promising responses to anti-programmed death-ligand 1 therapy have been described in case reports of UCOGCs. Recent advances in chemotherapeutic agents and molecular technologies are opening up the possibilities for expanded treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Imaoka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Masafumi Ikeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Kumiko Umemoto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yu Sunakawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takamichi Kuwahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Naohiro Okano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Kanai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Terumasa Hisano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yuko Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Asagi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Shioji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Akiko Todaka
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Kenji Ikezawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ikuya Miki
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Akutsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okuyama
- Department of Medical Clinical Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, MikiKagawa, Japan
| | - Junji Furuse
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Park BK, Seo JH, Han JH, Lee KJ, Son KJ, Choi JK. Trends in treatment patterns and survival outcomes in pancreatic cancer: A nationwide population-based study in Korea. Eur J Cancer 2023; 189:112932. [PMID: 37352643 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of pancreatic cancer has evolved; however, real-world data on treatment trends remain scarce. This study investigated treatment patterns for pancreatic cancer and patient survival using a nationwide population-based study in Korea. METHODS Using the National Health Insurance database, data from 78,920 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in Korea between 2006 and 2019 were extracted. Treatment patterns and survival by age group and year of diagnosis were examined. RESULTS Primary treatment was delivered as follows: 16,562 patients (21.0%) underwent surgery, 20,998 patients (26.6%) received chemotherapy, 1332 patients (1.7%) received chemoradiotherapy, and 40,040 patients (50.7%) received supportive care only. The proportion of patients undergoing surgery or chemotherapy increased gradually in all age groups over time. The commonly used anti-cancer drugs have changed from gemcitabine±erlotinib to gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX. Survival improved mainly in patients who underwent surgery or chemotherapy. Median overall survival for all patients improved from 5.5 months in 2006-2008 to 9.8 months in 2018-2019, with greater improvement observed in younger age groups: 8.8-18.8 months, age ≤59 years, 6.8-14.6 months, age 60-69 years, 4.2-8.3 months, age 70-79 years and 2.4-3.4 months, age ≥80 years (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS An increase in the rates of surgery and chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer was observed. Survival rates for pancreatic cancer have generally improved over the past decade and are greater in patients undergoing surgery or chemotherapy and in younger age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Kyu Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
| | - Jeong Hun Seo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Joung-Ho Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea
| | - Kyong Joo Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Kang Ju Son
- Department of Policy Research Affairs, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jung Kyu Choi
- Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Augustinus S, Schafrat PJM, Janssen BV, Bonsing BA, Brosens LAA, Busch OR, Crobach S, Doukas M, van Eijck CH, van der Geest LGM, Groot Koerkamp B, de Hingh IHJT, Raicu GM, van Santvoort HC, van Velthuysen ML, Verheij J, Besselink MG, Farina Sarasqueta A. Nationwide Impact of Centralization, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Minimally Invasive Surgery, and Standardized Pathology Reporting on R0 Resection and Overall Survival in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5051-5060. [PMID: 37210448 PMCID: PMC10319672 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13465-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons aim for R0 resection in patients with pancreatic cancer to improve overall survival. However, it is unclear whether recent changes in pancreatic cancer care such as centralization, increased use of neoadjuvant therapy, minimally invasive surgery, and standardized pathology reporting have influenced R0 resections and whether R0 resection remains associated with overall survival. METHODS This nationwide retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Database (2009-2019). R0 resection was defined as > 1 mm tumor clearance at the pancreatic, posterior, and vascular resection margins. Completeness of pathology reporting was scored on the basis of six elements: histological diagnosis, tumor origin, radicality, tumor size, extent of invasion, and lymph node examination. RESULTS Among 2955 patients after PD for pancreatic cancer, the R0 resection rate was 49%. The R0 resection rate decreased from 68 to 43% (2009-2019, P < 0.001). The extent of resections in high-volume hospitals, minimally invasive surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, and complete pathology reports all significantly increased over time. Only complete pathology reporting was independently associated with lower R0 rates (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.83, P < 0.001). Higher hospital volume, neoadjuvant therapy, and minimally invasive surgery were not associated with R0. R0 resection remained independently associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66-0.79, P < 0.001), as well as in the 214 patients after neoadjuvant treatment (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.87, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS The nationwide rate of R0 resections after PD for pancreatic cancer decreased over time, mostly related to more complete pathology reporting. R0 resection remained associated with overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Augustinus
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Pascale J M Schafrat
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boris V Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn Crobach
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lydia G M van der Geest
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - G Mihaela Raicu
- Department of Pathology, St Antonius Hospital and Pathology DNA, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Arantza Farina Sarasqueta
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Herpels M, Ishihara J, Sadanandam A. The clinical terrain of immunotherapies in heterogeneous pancreatic cancer: unravelling challenges and opportunities. J Pathol 2023; 260:533-550. [PMID: 37550956 DOI: 10.1002/path.6171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common and aggressive type of pancreatic cancer and has abysmal survival rates. In the past two decades, immunotherapeutic agents with success in other cancer types have gradually been trialled against PDACs at different stages of cancer progression, either as a monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Unfortunately, to this day, chemotherapy still prolongs the survival rates the most and is prescribed in clinics despite the severe side effects in other cancer types. The low success rates of immunotherapy against PDAC have been attributed most frequently to its complex and multi-faceted tumour microenvironment (TME) and low mutational burden. In this review, we give a comprehensive overview of the immunotherapies tested in PDAC clinical trials thus far, their limitations, and potential explanations for their failure. We also discuss the existing classification of heterogenous PDACs into cancer, cancer-associated fibroblast, and immune subtypes and their potential opportunity in patient selection as a form of personalisation of PDAC immunotherapy. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Herpels
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jun Ishihara
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Anguraj Sadanandam
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Centre for Global Oncology, Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Centre for Translational Immunotherapy, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Seelen LWF, Floortje van Oosten A, Brada LJH, Groot VP, Daamen LA, Walma MS, van der Lek BF, Liem MSL, Patijn GA, Stommel MWJ, van Dam RM, Koerkamp BG, Busch OR, de Hingh IHJT, van Eijck CHJ, Besselink MG, Burkhart RA, Borel Rinkes IHM, Wolfgang CL, Molenaar IQ, He J, van Santvoort HC. Early Recurrence After Resection of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Following Induction Therapy: An International Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:118-126. [PMID: 35950757 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish an evidence-based cutoff and predictors for early recurrence in patients with resected locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). BACKGROUND It is unclear how many and which patients develop early recurrence after LAPC resection. Surgery in these patients is probably of little benefit. METHODS We analyzed all consecutive patients undergoing resection of LAPC after induction chemotherapy who were included in prospective databases in The Netherlands (2015-2019) and the Johns Hopkins Hospital (2016-2018). The optimal definition for "early recurrence" was determined by the post-recurrence survival (PRS). Patients were compared for overall survival (OS). Predictors for early recurrence were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Overall, 168 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 28 months, recurrence was observed in 118 patients (70.2%). The optimal cutoff for recurrence-free survival to differentiate between early (n=52) and late recurrence (n=66) was 6 months ( P <0.001). OS was 8.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.3-9.6] in the early recurrence group (n=52) versus 31.1 months (95% CI: 25.7-36.4) in the late/no recurrence group (n=116) ( P <0.001). A preoperative predictor for early recurrence was postinduction therapy carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9≥100 U/mL [odds ratio (OR)=4.15, 95% CI: 1.75-9.84, P =0.001]. Postoperative predictors were poor tumor differentiation (OR=4.67, 95% CI: 1.83-11.90, P =0.001) and no adjuvant chemotherapy (OR=6.04, 95% CI: 2.43-16.55, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Early recurrence was observed in one third of patients after LAPC resection and was associated with poor survival. Patients with post-induction therapy CA 19-9 ≥100 U/mL, poor tumor differentiation and no adjuvant therapy were especially at risk. This information is valuable for patient counseling before and after resection of LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard W F Seelen
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Floortje van Oosten
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lilly J H Brada
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent P Groot
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke S Walma
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan F van der Lek
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Inne H M Borel Rinkes
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Izaak Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ramaekers M, Viviers CGA, Janssen BV, Hellström TAE, Ewals L, van der Wulp K, Nederend J, Jacobs I, Pluyter JR, Mavroeidis D, van der Sommen F, Besselink MG, Luyer MDP. Computer-Aided Detection for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: Radiological Challenges and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4209. [PMID: 37445243 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiological imaging plays a crucial role in the detection and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, there are several challenges associated with the use of these techniques in daily clinical practice. Determination of the presence or absence of cancer using radiological imaging is difficult and requires specific expertise, especially after neoadjuvant therapy. Early detection and characterization of tumors would potentially increase the number of patients who are eligible for curative treatment. Over the last decades, artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) has rapidly evolved as a means for improving the radiological detection of cancer and the assessment of the extent of disease. Although the results of AI applications seem promising, widespread adoption in clinical practice has not taken place. This narrative review provides an overview of current radiological CAD systems in pancreatic cancer, highlights challenges that are pertinent to clinical practice, and discusses potential solutions for these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Ramaekers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Christiaan G A Viviers
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Boris V Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Terese A E Hellström
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Ewals
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Kasper van der Wulp
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Igor Jacobs
- Department of Hospital Services and Informatics, Philips Research, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jon R Pluyter
- Department of Experience Design, Philips Design, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitrios Mavroeidis
- Department of Data Science, Philips Research, 5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Fons van der Sommen
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bao H, Cao J, Chen M, Chen M, Chen W, Chen X, Chen Y, Chen Y, Chen Y, Chen Z, Chhetri JK, Ding Y, Feng J, Guo J, Guo M, He C, Jia Y, Jiang H, Jing Y, Li D, Li J, Li J, Liang Q, Liang R, Liu F, Liu X, Liu Z, Luo OJ, Lv J, Ma J, Mao K, Nie J, Qiao X, Sun X, Tang X, Wang J, Wang Q, Wang S, Wang X, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wu R, Xia K, Xiao FH, Xu L, Xu Y, Yan H, Yang L, Yang R, Yang Y, Ying Y, Zhang L, Zhang W, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Zhou M, Zhou R, Zhu Q, Zhu Z, Cao F, Cao Z, Chan P, Chen C, Chen G, Chen HZ, Chen J, Ci W, Ding BS, Ding Q, Gao F, Han JDJ, Huang K, Ju Z, Kong QP, Li J, Li J, Li X, Liu B, Liu F, Liu L, Liu Q, Liu Q, Liu X, Liu Y, Luo X, Ma S, Ma X, Mao Z, Nie J, Peng Y, Qu J, Ren J, Ren R, Song M, Songyang Z, Sun YE, Sun Y, Tian M, Wang S, Wang S, Wang X, Wang X, Wang YJ, Wang Y, Wong CCL, Xiang AP, Xiao Y, Xie Z, Xu D, Ye J, Yue R, Zhang C, Zhang H, Zhang L, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zhang YW, Zhang Z, Zhao T, Zhao Y, Zhu D, Zou W, Pei G, Liu GH. Biomarkers of aging. SCIENCE CHINA. LIFE SCIENCES 2023; 66:893-1066. [PMID: 37076725 PMCID: PMC10115486 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-023-2305-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
Aging biomarkers are a combination of biological parameters to (i) assess age-related changes, (ii) track the physiological aging process, and (iii) predict the transition into a pathological status. Although a broad spectrum of aging biomarkers has been developed, their potential uses and limitations remain poorly characterized. An immediate goal of biomarkers is to help us answer the following three fundamental questions in aging research: How old are we? Why do we get old? And how can we age slower? This review aims to address this need. Here, we summarize our current knowledge of biomarkers developed for cellular, organ, and organismal levels of aging, comprising six pillars: physiological characteristics, medical imaging, histological features, cellular alterations, molecular changes, and secretory factors. To fulfill all these requisites, we propose that aging biomarkers should qualify for being specific, systemic, and clinically relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hainan Bao
- CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Jiani Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Mengting Chen
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Aging Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China
| | - Min Chen
- Clinic Center of Human Gene Research, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Metabolic Abnormalities and Vascular Aging, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Stem Cell Translational Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200065, China
| | - Xiao Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China
| | - Yanhao Chen
- CAS Key Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China
| | - Yu Chen
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Yutian Chen
- The Department of Endovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Zhiyang Chen
- Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine of Ministry of Education, Institute of Ageing and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China
| | - Jagadish K Chhetri
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Yingjie Ding
- CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Junlin Feng
- CAS Key Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China
| | - Jun Guo
- The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology of National Health Commission, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Mengmeng Guo
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Chuting He
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Yujuan Jia
- Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China
| | - Haiping Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Ying Jing
- Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
- Aging Translational Medicine Center, International Center for Aging and Cancer, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Dingfeng Li
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230036, China
| | - Jiaming Li
- CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Jingyi Li
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Qinhao Liang
- College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China
| | - Rui Liang
- Research Institute of Transplant Medicine, Organ Transplant Center, NHC Key Laboratory for Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300384, China
| | - Feng Liu
- MOE Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Healthy Aging Research, School of Life Sciences, Institute of Healthy Aging Research, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China
| | - Xiaoqian Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Zuojun Liu
- School of Life Sciences, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China
| | - Oscar Junhong Luo
- Department of Systems Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China
| | - Jianwei Lv
- School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China
| | - Jingyi Ma
- The State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, National Clinical Research Center of Kidney Disease, Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China
| | - Kehang Mao
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Center for Quantitative Biology (CQB), Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Jiawei Nie
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory for Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine (Shanghai), International Center for Aging and Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Xinhua Qiao
- National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Xinpei Sun
- Peking University International Cancer Institute, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Tang
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of MOE, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Jianfang Wang
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China
| | - Qiaoran Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Siyuan Wang
- Clinical Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xuan Wang
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Center, Medical Research Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, 102218, China
| | - Yaning Wang
- Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- Advanced Medical Technology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Yuhan Wang
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Rimo Wu
- Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, 510005, China
| | - Kai Xia
- Center for Stem Cell Biologyand Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Fu-Hui Xiao
- CAS Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Key Laboratory of Healthy Aging Research of Yunnan Province, Kunming Key Laboratory of Healthy Aging Study, KIZ/CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research in Common Diseases, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China
| | - Lingyan Xu
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, China
| | - Yingying Xu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Haoteng Yan
- Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
- Aging Translational Medicine Center, International Center for Aging and Cancer, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China
| | - Liang Yang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510530, China
| | - Ruici Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China
| | - Yuanxin Yang
- Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China
| | - Yilin Ying
- Department of Geriatrics, Medical Center on Aging of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
- International Laboratory in Hematology and Cancer, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine/Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Le Zhang
- Gerontology Center of Hubei Province, Wuhan, 430000, China
- Institute of Gerontology, Department of Geriatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Weiwei Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Wenwan Zhang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China
| | - Xing Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, School of Aerospace Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Zhuo Zhang
- Optogenetics & Synthetic Biology Interdisciplinary Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China
- Research Unit of New Techniques for Live-cell Metabolic Imaging, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Min Zhou
- Department of Endocrinology, Endocrinology Research Center, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China
| | - Rui Zhou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China
| | - Qingchen Zhu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China
| | - Zhengmao Zhu
- Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China
- Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300020, China
| | - Feng Cao
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Zhongwei Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Piu Chan
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
| | - Chang Chen
- National Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Guobing Chen
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China.
- Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Great Bay Area Geroscience Joint Laboratory, Guangzhou, 510000, China.
| | - Hou-Zao Chen
- Department of Biochemistryand Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China.
| | - Jun Chen
- Peking University Research Center on Aging, Beijing Key Laboratory of Protein Posttranslational Modifications and Cell Function, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine, School of Basic Medical Science, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
| | - Weimin Ci
- CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Bi-Sen Ding
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Qiurong Ding
- CAS Key Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
| | - Feng Gao
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, School of Aerospace Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
| | - Jing-Dong J Han
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Center for Quantitative Biology (CQB), Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
| | - Kai Huang
- Clinic Center of Human Gene Research, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
- Hubei Clinical Research Center of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Metabolic Abnormalities and Vascular Aging, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
- Department of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
| | - Zhenyu Ju
- Key Laboratory of Regenerative Medicine of Ministry of Education, Institute of Ageing and Regenerative Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China.
| | - Qing-Peng Kong
- CAS Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Key Laboratory of Healthy Aging Research of Yunnan Province, Kunming Key Laboratory of Healthy Aging Study, KIZ/CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research in Common Diseases, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.
| | - Ji Li
- Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Aging Biology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
| | - Jian Li
- The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics, Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology of National Health Commission, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Xin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Baohua Liu
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
| | - Feng Liu
- Metabolic Syndrome Research Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South Unversity, Changsha, 410011, China.
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
- Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, 300020, China.
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300000, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
| | - Qiang Liu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230036, China.
| | - Qiang Liu
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
- Tianjin Institute of Immunology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China.
| | - Xingguo Liu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, Joint School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510530, China.
| | - Yong Liu
- College of Life Sciences, TaiKang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, China.
| | - Xianghang Luo
- Department of Endocrinology, Endocrinology Research Center, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
| | - Shuai Ma
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Xinran Ma
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, China.
| | - Zhiyong Mao
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
| | - Jing Nie
- The State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, National Clinical Research Center of Kidney Disease, Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
| | - Yaojin Peng
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Jing Qu
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Jie Ren
- CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Ruibao Ren
- Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory for Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine (Shanghai), International Center for Aging and Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
- International Center for Aging and Cancer, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 571199, China.
| | - Moshi Song
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Zhou Songyang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Healthy Aging Research, School of Life Sciences, Institute of Healthy Aging Research, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China.
- Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
| | - Yi Eve Sun
- Stem Cell Translational Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200065, China.
| | - Yu Sun
- CAS Key Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
- Department of Medicine and VAPSHCS, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Mei Tian
- Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201203, China.
| | - Shusen Wang
- Research Institute of Transplant Medicine, Organ Transplant Center, NHC Key Laboratory for Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300384, China.
| | - Si Wang
- Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
- Aging Translational Medicine Center, International Center for Aging and Cancer, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
| | - Xia Wang
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
| | - Xiaoning Wang
- Institute of Geriatrics, The second Medical Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Aging and Geriatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
| | - Yan-Jiang Wang
- Department of Neurology and Center for Clinical Neuroscience, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
| | - Yunfang Wang
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Center, Medical Research Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, 102218, China.
| | - Catherine C L Wong
- Clinical Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Andy Peng Xiang
- Center for Stem Cell Biologyand Tissue Engineering, Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
- National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Yichuan Xiao
- CAS Key Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
| | - Zhengwei Xie
- Peking University International Cancer Institute, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Beijing & Qingdao Langu Pharmaceutical R&D Platform, Beijing Gigaceuticals Tech. Co. Ltd., Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Daichao Xu
- Interdisciplinary Research Center on Biology and Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201210, China.
| | - Jing Ye
- Department of Geriatrics, Medical Center on Aging of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
- International Laboratory in Hematology and Cancer, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine/Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| | - Rui Yue
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
| | - Cuntai Zhang
- Gerontology Center of Hubei Province, Wuhan, 430000, China.
- Institute of Gerontology, Department of Geriatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
| | - Hongbo Zhang
- Key Laboratory for Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
- Advanced Medical Technology Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Liang Zhang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Weiqi Zhang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Genomic and Precision Medicine, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Yong Zhang
- Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, 510005, China.
- The State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China.
| | - Yun-Wu Zhang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Disease and Aging Research, Institute of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.
| | - Zhuohua Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Precision Medicine of Hunan Province and Center for Medical Genetics, Institute of Molecular Precision Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410078, China.
- Department of Neurosciences, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China.
| | - Tongbiao Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China.
| | - Yuzheng Zhao
- Optogenetics & Synthetic Biology Interdisciplinary Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Optogenetic Techniques for Cell Metabolism, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China.
- Research Unit of New Techniques for Live-cell Metabolic Imaging, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Dahai Zhu
- Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou, 510005, China.
- The State Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China.
| | - Weiguo Zou
- State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
| | - Gang Pei
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Laboratory of Receptor-Based Biomedicine, The Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200070, China.
| | - Guang-Hui Liu
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, 100101, China.
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Prediction of Biomarker Expression on Primary Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Tissues Using Fine-Needle Biopsies: Paving the Way for a Patient-Tailored Molecular Imaging Approach. Mol Diagn Ther 2023; 27:261-273. [PMID: 36656512 PMCID: PMC10008234 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-022-00635-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted molecular imaging may improve tumor cell identification during diagnosis and resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Although many molecular imaging biomarkers are (over)expressed in PDAC, intertumoral heterogeneity of biomarker expression hampers universal tracer administration. Preoperative, patient-specific screening and selection of the most optimal biomarker could therefore improve tumor delineation. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated whether fine-needle biopsy (FNB) specimens could be used to preoperatively predict biomarker expression in the corresponding primary PDAC specimen. METHODS Expression of previously identified PDAC biomarkers αvβ6, CEACAM5, EGFR, mesothelin, Lea/c/x, and sdi-Lea on FNB and corresponding primary tumor (PT) specimens (n = 45) was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and quantified using a semi-automated image analysis workflow. RESULTS Biomarker expression on FNB and PT tissues showed high concordance (∆H-score ≤ 50), i.e. was present in 62% of cases for αvβ6, 61% for CEACAM5, 85% for EGFR, 69% for mesothelin, 76% for Lea/c/x, and 79% for sdi-Lea, indicating high concordance. Except for αvβ6, biomarker expression on FNB tissues was positively correlated with PT expression for all biomarkers. Subgroup analyses showed that neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) had no major and/or significant effect on concordance, expression difference and, except for mesothelin, correlation of biomarker expression between FNB and PT tissues. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that biomarker expression in FNB tissues is predictive for PT expression, irrespective of the application of NAT. These findings thereby provide the foundation for the clinical application of an FNB-based biomarker-screening workflow, eventually facilitating a patient-specific approach of molecular imaging tracer administration in PDAC.
Collapse
|
32
|
Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with intradermal heat-killed mycobacterium obuense (IMM-101) vaccination for non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer, after induction chemotherapy with (modified)FOLFIRINOX - The LAPC-2 trial. Radiother Oncol 2023; 183:109541. [PMID: 36813171 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In this phase I/II trial, non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients after (modified)FOLFIRINOX therapy were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with heat-killed mycobacterium (IMM-101) vaccinations. We aimed to assess safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this treatment approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS On five consecutive days, patients received a total of 40 Gray (Gy) of SBRT with a dose of 8 Gy per fraction. Starting two weeks prior to SBRT, they in addition received six bi-weekly intradermal vaccinations with one milligram of IMM-101. The primary outcomes were the number of grade 4 or higher adverse events and the one-year progression free-survival (PFS) rate. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included and started study treatment. Median follow-up was 28.4 months (95 %CI 24.3 - 32.6). We observed one grade 5, no grade 4 and thirteen grade 3 adverse events, none related to IMM-101. The one-year PFS rate was 47 %, the median PFS was 11.7 months (95 %CI 11.0 - 12.5) and the median overall survival was 19.0 months (95 %CI 16.2 - 21.9). Eight (21 %) tumors were resected, of which 6 (75 %) were R0 resections. Outcomes were comparable with the outcomes of the patients from the previous LAPC-1 trial, in which LAPC patients were treated with SBRT, without IMM-101. CONCLUSION Combination treatment with IMM-101 and SBRT was safe and feasible for non-progressive locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients after (modified)FOLFIRINOX. No improvement in the progression-free survival could be demonstrated by adding IMM-101 to SBRT.
Collapse
|
33
|
Lan X, Robin G, Kasnik J, Wong G, Abdel-Rahman O. Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency among Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041331. [PMID: 36831673 PMCID: PMC9953920 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common malignancy of the pancreas and is associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Many PDAC patients suffer from profound nutritional complications such as nutrient deficiencies, weight loss, malnutrition, and cancer cachexia. These complications cause barriers to effective anticancer treatments, gravely influence their quality of life, and decrease their overall survival. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is defined as impaired digestion due to inadequate secretion of pancreatic enzymes and is a common cause of malnutrition in PDAC. This review first summarizes the existing literature around malnutrition in PDAC, with a particular focus on PEI and its management with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). Second, we summarize existing guidelines and recommendations for the management of PEI among patients with PDAC. Lastly, we highlight potential gaps of knowledge of PEI among healthcare providers resulting in underdiagnosis and treatment, which may have implications for the quality of life and overall survival of PDAC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyang Lan
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
| | - Gabrielle Robin
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
| | - Jessica Kasnik
- Nutrition Services, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
| | - Grace Wong
- Pharmacy Department, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
| | - Omar Abdel-Rahman
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-7804328290
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pedrazzoli S. Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: Currently Debated Topics on Vascular Resection. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231153094. [PMID: 36693246 PMCID: PMC9893105 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231153094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Vascular resections involving the superior mesenteric and portal veins (SMV-PV), celiac axis (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and hepatic artery (HA) have multiplied in recent years, raising the resection rate for pancreatic cancer (PDAC) and the related morbidity and mortality rates. While resection is generally accepted for resectable SMV-PV, the usefulness of associated arterial resection in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally-advanced PDAC (LAPC) is much debated. Careful selection of splenic vein reconstruction is very important to prevent left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH). During distal pancreatectomy (DP), CA and common HA resection is largely accepted, while there is debate on the value of SMA and proper HA resection and reconstruction. Their resection is useless according to several reviews and meta-analyses, and some international societies, although some high-volume centers have reported good results. Short- and long-term reconstructed vessel patency varies with the type of reconstruction, the material used, and the surgeon's experience. Laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and DP are generally accepted if done by surgeons performing at least 10 such procedures annually. The usefulness of associated vascular resection remains highly controversial. Surgeons need to complete numerous minimally-invasive procedures to overcome the learning curve, and prevent an increase in complications and surgical mortality. Higher resectability rates and satisfactory long-term results have been reported after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for BRPC and LAPC requiring vascular resection. It is essential to select the most appropriate NAT for a given patient and to assess PDAC resectability preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Pedrazzoli
- University of Padua, Padova, Italy,Sergio Pedrazzoli, University of Padua, Via Crescini, 39, Padova 35126, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Circulating Monocytes Serve as Novel Prognostic Biomarker in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020363. [PMID: 36672313 PMCID: PMC9856871 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranks among the most fatal cancer diseases, widely accepted to have the most dismal prognoses. Although immunotherapy has broadly revolutionized cancer treatment, its value in PDAC appears to be relatively low. Exhibiting protumoral effects, monocytes have recently been proposed as potential targets of such immunotherapeutic regimens. However, to date, the body of evidence on monocytes’ role in PDAC is scarce. Therefore, we analyzed monocytes in the peripheral blood of 58 PDAC patients prior to surgery and compared them to healthy individuals. PDAC patients showed increased levels of monocytes when compared to healthy controls In addition, patients with perineural infiltration demonstrated a higher percentage of monocytes compared to non-infiltrating tumors and PDAC G3 was associated with higher monocyte levels than PDAC G2. Patients with monocyte levels > 5% were found to have an 8.9-fold increased risk for a G3 and perineural infiltrated PDAC resulting in poorer survival compared to patients with <5% monocyte levels. Furthermore, PDAC patients showed increased expressions of CD86 and CD11c and decreased expressions of PD-L1 on monocytes compared to healthy individuals. Finally, levels of monocytes correlated positively with concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-α in plasma of PDAC patients. Based on our findings, we propose monocytes as a novel prognostic biomarker. Large-scale studies are needed to further decipher the role of monocytes in PDAC and investigate their potential as therapeutic targets.
Collapse
|
36
|
Nghiem V, Wood S, Ramachandran R, Williams G, Outlaw D, Paluri R, Kim YI, Gbolahan O. Short- and Long-Term Survival of Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer in the United States From 2000 to 2018. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231211764. [PMID: 37926828 PMCID: PMC10668577 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231211764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Information about survival outcomes in metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) is sparse, and the numbers often quoted are based on reports of clinical trials data that may not be representative of patients treated in the real world. Furthermore, the impact of more widespread adoption of a standardized combination chemotherapy regimen since 2010 on survival is unclear. METHODS We performed an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to determine the real-world overall survival trends in a cohort of patients with metastatic BTC diagnosed between the years 2000 and 2017 with follow-up until 2018. We analyzed data for the entire cohort, evaluated short-term and long-term survival rates, and compared survival outcomes in the pre-2010 and post-2010 periods. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate factors associated with survival. RESULTS Among 13, 287 patients, the median age was 68 years. There was a preponderance of female (57%) and white (77%) patients. Forty-one percent died within 3 months of diagnosis (short-term survivors) and 20% were long-term survivors (12 months or longer). The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 4.5 months. Median OS improved post-2010 (4.5 months) compared to pre-2010 (3.5 months) (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, age <55 years, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, surgical resection, and diagnosis post-2010 were associated with lower hazard of death. CONCLUSION The real-world prognosis of metastatic BTC is remarkably poorer than described in clinical trials because a large proportion of patients survive less than three months. Over the last decade, the improvement in survival has been minimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Van Nghiem
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sarah Wood
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rekha Ramachandran
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Grant Williams
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Darryl Outlaw
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Ravikumar Paluri
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Young-il Kim
- Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Olumide Gbolahan
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Factors that influence the pancreatic and duodenal microbiome in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278377. [PMID: 36525425 PMCID: PMC9757549 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES This study examined the correlation between pancreatic microbiome and patients characteristics. Furthermore, we compared different duodenal materials to examine their reflection of the pancreatic microbiome. METHODS Patients undergoing pancreatic surgery were included in the study. Characteristics of those patients were prospectively registered and sterile pancreatic biopsies were collected during surgery. After completion of the resection, duodenal fluid, -tissue and -swab were collected. Bacterial DNA was extracted and analyzed with IS-pro assay. RESULTS Paired samples of 51 patients were available for evaluation, including pancreatic biopsies from all patients, 22 duodenal fluids, 21 duodenal swabs and 11 duodenal tissues. The pancreatic microbiome consisted mostly of Proteobacteria followed by Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria and Verrucomicrobia (FAFV) and Bacteroidetes. On species level, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter-Klebsiella were most abundant. In pancreatic biopsies, the total bacterial load and Proteobacteria load were significantly higher in patients with biliary drainage (54618.0 vs 5623.5; 9119.0 vs 2067.1). Patients who used proton pump inhibitors had a significantly higher total bacterial load (115964.7 vs 8495.8), more FAFV (66862.9 vs 1890.1), more Proteobacteria (24245.9 vs 2951.4) and more Bacteroidetes (542.5 vs 25.8). The head of the pancreas contained significantly more bacteria (21193.4 vs 2096.8) and more FAFV (5225.7 vs 19.0) compared to the tail, regardless of biliary drainage. Furthermore, the microbiome of all duodenal materials showed a weak correlation with the pancreatic microbiome. CONCLUSION Biliary drainage, use of proton pump inhibitors, and anatomic location of the pancreatic biopsy influence the pancreatic microbiome. Furthermore, the duodenal microbiome does not suffice as a surrogate for the pancreatic microbiome.
Collapse
|
38
|
Lin YJ, Burkhart R, Lu TP, Wolfgang C, Wright M, Zheng L, Wu HY, Chen CH, Lee SY, Wu CH, He J, Tien YW. Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas Across Races Demonstrate Disparities with Comparably Good Prognosis. World J Surg 2022; 46:3072-3080. [PMID: 36066663 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06717-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are rare with low-grade malignancy and unclarified clinicopathological features. This study aimed to examine their characteristics and re-evaluate current treatments. METHODS Databases from three sources were screened for patients with SPNs. We compared the perioperative variables, clinical data, overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for recurrence among the three corresponding cohorts. RESULTS We identified 286 patients diagnosed with SPNs between 1988 and 2020. Patients were mostly women (81%; median age: 38 years), and peak incidence was observed in women of 20-29 years of age. SPNs had a peak incidence in Asian men at 50-59 years of age (p = 0.002) and a delayed peak incidence in Asian women at 30-39 years of age (p < 0.001). Treatment strategies differed significantly across the institutions and included variations in the number of harvested lymph nodes and rates of vascular resection. Lymph node positivity was the only predictor of postoperative recurrence (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.99; p = 0.007). Higher rates of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.02), perineural invasion (p < 0.001), and R1 margin involvement (p < 0.001), as seen in one institution, did not result in poorer long-term survival in terms of the overall (p = 0.43), SPN-specific (p = 0.69), and recurrence-free survivals (p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS In contrast to previous findings that SPNs are prevalent in young women, a racial predilection for middle-aged Asian men and a delayed female peak incidence were noted. Parenchyma-preserving pancreatectomy may be an acceptable treatment. Non-radical surgery may be appropriate in patients with multiple comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Jen Lin
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Rd., Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
| | - Richard Burkhart
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Tzu-Pin Lu
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Christopher Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health System, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael Wright
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Lei Zheng
- Departments of Surgery and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Han-Yu Wu
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Rd., Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Hsuan Chen
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Yi Lee
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Rd., Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hui Wu
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Rd., Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. .,Department of Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Jin He
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Halsted 614, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Yu-Wen Tien
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Rd., Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Joliat GR, Labgaa I, Sulzer J, Vrochides D, Zerbi A, Nappo G, Perinel J, Adham M, van Roessel S, Besselink MG, Mieog JSD, Groen JV, Demartines N, Schäfer M. International assessment and validation of the prognostic role of lymph node ratio in patients with resected pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2022; 11:822-833. [PMID: 36523941 PMCID: PMC9745624 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
Background Lymph node ratio (LNR; positive/harvested lymph nodes) was identified as overall survival predictor in several cancers, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma. It remains unclear if LNR is predictive of overall survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients staged pN2. This study assessed the prognostic overall survival role of LNR in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients in relation with lymph node involvement. Methods A retrospective international study in six different centers (Europe and United States) was performed. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy from 2000 to 2017 were included. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment, metastases, R2 resections, or missing data regarding nodal status were excluded. Survival curves were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regressions were performed to find independent overall survival predictors adjusted for potential confounders. Results A total of 1,327 patients were included. Lymph node involvement (pN+) was found in 1,026 patients (77%), 561 pN1 (55%) and 465 pN2 (45%). Median LNR in pN+ patients was 0.214 [interquartile range (IQR): 0.105-0.364]. On multivariable analysis, LNR was the strongest overall survival predictor in the entire cohort [hazard ratio (HR) =5.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1-9.9; P<0.001] and pN+ patients (HR =3.8; 95% CI: 2.2-6.6; P<0.001). Median overall survival was better in patients with LNR <0.225 compared to patients with LNR ≥0.225 in the entire cohort and pN+ patients. Similar results were found in pN2 patients (worse overall survival when LNR ≥0.225). Conclusions LNR appeared as an important prognostic factor in patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and permitted to stratify overall survival in pN2 patients. LNR should be routinely used in complement to tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage to better predict patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëtan-Romain Joliat
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ismail Labgaa
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jesse Sulzer
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nappo
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Julie Perinel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Mustapha Adham
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Stijn van Roessel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. Sven D. Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse V. Groen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Markus Schäfer
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Park W, O'Connor CA, Bandlamudi C, Forman D, Chou JF, Umeda S, Reyngold M, Varghese AM, Keane F, Balogun F, Yu KH, Kelsen DP, Crane C, Capanu M, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, O'Reilly EM. Clinico-genomic Characterization of ATM and HRD in Pancreas Cancer: Application for Practice. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4782-4792. [PMID: 36040493 PMCID: PMC9634347 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Characterizing germline and somatic ATM variants (gATMm, sATMm) zygosity and their contribution to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is important for therapeutic strategy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Clinico-genomic data for patients with PDAC and other cancers with ATM variants were abstracted. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were derived from ATM-mutant cancers and overall survival (OS) was evaluated. RESULTS Forty-six patients had PDAC and pathogenic ATM variants including 24 (52%) stage III/IV: gATMm (N = 24), and sATMm (N = 22). Twenty-seven (59%) had biallelic, 15 (33%) monoallelic, and 4 indeterminate (8%) variants. Median OS for advanced-stage cohort at diagnosis (N = 24) was 19.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.3-not reached (NR)], 27.1 months (95% CI: 22.7-NR) for gATMm (n = 11), and 12.3 months for sATMm (n = 13; 95% CI: 11.9-NR; P = 0.025). GIS was computed for 33 patients with PDAC and compared with other ATM-mutant cancers enriched for HRD. The median was lower (median, 11; range, 2-29) relative to breast (18, 3-55) or ovarian (25, 3-56) ATM-mutant cancers (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Interestingly, biallelic pathogenic ATM variants were mutually exclusive with TP53. Other canonical driver gene (KRAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4) variants were less frequent in ATM-mutant PDAC. CONCLUSIONS ATM variants in PDAC represent a distinct biologic group and appear to have favorable OS. Nonetheless, pathogenic ATM variants do not confer an HRD signature in PDAC and ATM should be considered as a non-core HR gene in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wungki Park
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Parker Institute of Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Catherine A O'Connor
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
- Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniella Forman
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joanne F Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shigeaki Umeda
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Human Oncology Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York
| | - Marsha Reyngold
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anna M Varghese
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Fergus Keane
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Fiyinfolu Balogun
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth H Yu
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David P Kelsen
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher Crane
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Human Oncology Pathogenesis Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mason J, Lundberg E, Jonsson P, Nyström H, Franklin O, Lundin C, Naredi P, Antti H, Sund M, Öhlund D. A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of Pre-Diagnostic Blood Plasma Biomarkers for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232112969. [PMID: 36361759 PMCID: PMC9653916 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232112969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major cause of cancer death that typically presents at an advanced stage. No reliable markers for early detection presently exist. The prominent tumor stroma represents a source of circulating biomarkers for use together with cancer cell-derived biomarkers for earlier PDAC diagnosis. CA19-9 and CEA (cancer cell-derived biomarkers), together with endostatin and collagen IV (stroma-derived) were examined alone, or together, by multivariable modelling, using pre-diagnostic plasma samples (n = 259 samples) from the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study biobank. Serial samples were available for a subgroup of future patients. Marker efficacy for future PDAC case prediction (n = 154 future cases) was examined by both cross-sectional (ROC analysis) and longitudinal analyses. CA19-9 performed well at, and within, six months to diagnosis and multivariable modelling was not superior to CA19-9 alone in cross-sectional analysis. Within six months to diagnosis, CA19-9 (AUC = 0.92) outperformed the multivariable model (AUC = 0.81) at a cross-sectional level. At diagnosis, CA19-9 (AUC = 0.995) and the model (AUC = 0.977) performed similarly. Longitudinal analysis revealed increases in CA19-9 up to two years to diagnosis which indicates a window of opportunity for early detection of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Mason
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
| | - Erik Lundberg
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
| | - Pär Jonsson
- Department of Chemistry, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
| | - Hanna Nyström
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
| | - Oskar Franklin
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
| | - Christina Lundin
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
| | - Peter Naredi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Henrik Antti
- Department of Chemistry, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
| | - Malin Sund
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 000 29 Helsinki, Finland
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (D.Ö.); Tel.: +46-(0)-90-785-19-66 (M.S.); +46-(0)-90-785-17-27 (D.Ö.)
| | - Daniel Öhlund
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (D.Ö.); Tel.: +46-(0)-90-785-19-66 (M.S.); +46-(0)-90-785-17-27 (D.Ö.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Suurmeijer JA, Soer EC, Dings MPG, Kim Y, Strijker M, Bonsing BA, Brosens LAA, Busch OR, Groen JV, Halfwerk JB, Slooff RAE, van Laarhoven HWM, Molenaar IQ, Offerhaus GJA, Morreau H, van de Vijver MJ, Fariña Sarasqueta A, Verheij J, Besselink MG, Bijlsma MF, Dijk F. Impact of classical and basal-like molecular subtypes on overall survival in resected pancreatic cancer in the SPACIOUS-2 multicentre study. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1150-1155. [PMID: 35979597 PMCID: PMC10364758 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recently identified classical and basal-like molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer impact on overall survival (OS). However, the added value of routine subtyping in both clinical practice and randomized trials is still unclear, as most studies do not consider clinicopathological parameters. This study examined the clinical prognostic value of molecular subtyping in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS Subtypes were determined on fresh-frozen resected pancreatic cancer samples from three Dutch centres using the Purity Independent Subtyping of Tumours classification. Patient, treatment, and histopathological variables were compared between subtypes. The prognostic value of subtyping in (simulated) pre- and postoperative settings was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Of 199 patients with resected pancreatic cancer, 164 (82.4 per cent) were classified as the classical and 35 (17.6 per cent) as the basal-like subtype. Patients with a basal-like subtype had worse OS (11 versus 16 months (HR 1.49, 95 per cent c.i. 1.03 to 2.15; P = 0.035)) than patients with a classical subtype. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, including only clinical variables, the basal-like subtype was a statistically significant predictor for poor OS (HR 1.61, 95 per cent c.i. 1.11 to 2.34; P = 0.013). When histopathological variables were added to this model, the prognostic value of subtyping decreased (HR 1.49, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 2.19; P = 0.045). CONCLUSION The basal-like subtype was associated with worse OS in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Adding molecular classification to inform on tumor biology may be used in patient stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Annelie Suurmeijer
- *Correspondence to: Frederike Dijk, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 (AMC hospital), 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: ); Marc Gerard Besselink, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117 (VUMC Hospital, ZH-7F), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | - Eline C Soer
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark P G Dings
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yongsoo Kim
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marin Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse V Groen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes B Halfwerk
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robbert A E Slooff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein & University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G Johan A Offerhaus
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Morreau
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J van de Vijver
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- *Correspondence to: Frederike Dijk, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 (AMC hospital), 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: ); Marc Gerard Besselink, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117 (VUMC Hospital, ZH-7F), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- *Correspondence to: Frederike Dijk, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 (AMC hospital), 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: ); Marc Gerard Besselink, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117 (VUMC Hospital, ZH-7F), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer: Currently debated topics on morbidity, mortality, and lymphadenectomy. Surg Oncol 2022; 45:101858. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
44
|
Hopstaken JS, Vissers PAJ, Quispel R, de Vos-Geelen J, Brosens LAA, de Hingh IHJT, van der Geest LG, Besselink MG, van Laarhoven KJHM, Stommel MWJ. Impact of multicentre diagnostic workup in patients with pancreatic cancer on repeated diagnostic investigations, time-to-diagnosis and time-to-treatment: A nationwide analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:2195-2201. [PMID: 35701256 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the centralization of pancreatic surgery, patients with suspected pancreatic cancer may undergo diagnostic workup in both a non-pancreatic centre and a pancreatic centre, i.e. multicentre workup. This retrospective study assessed whether multicentre diagnostic workup is associated with repeated diagnostics, delayed time-to-diagnosis, delayed time-to-treatment, survival and whether variation existed among pancreatic cancer networks. METHODS This nationwide study included all patients diagnosed with non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in 2015, registered by the Netherlands Cancer Registry. A delayed time-to-diagnosis was defined as ≥3 weeks from initial hospital visit to final diagnosis. A delayed time-to-treatment was defined as ≥6 weeks from the first hospital visit to start of first tumour treatment. Multilevel logistic regression analyses and survival analyses were performed. RESULTS In total, 931 patients with non-metastatic PDAC were included. Overall, 175 patients (19%) underwent a multicentre diagnostic workup, which was significantly associated with repeated diagnostic investigations (OR = 6.31, 95% CI 4.13-9.64, P < 0.0001), a delayed time-to-diagnosis (OR = 2.66 95% CI 1.74-4.06, P < 0.001), and a delayed time-to-treatment (OR = 1.93 95% CI 1.12-3.31, P = 0.02), but not with decreased survival (HR = 1.09 95% CI 0.83-1.44; P = 0.532). Variation in outcomes per network was observed, especially for time-to-treatment, though the ICC was not statistically significant (P = 0.065). CONCLUSION Multicentre diagnostic workup for patients with PDAC is associated with repeated diagnostic investigations, a delayed time-to-diagnosis and delayed time-to-treatment compared to patients with monocentre workup. To reduce costs and improve treatment times, efforts should be made to improve network coordination, for example via network care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana S Hopstaken
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Pauline A J Vissers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Department of Pathology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Lydia G van der Geest
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Henry AC, Schouten TJ, Daamen LA, Walma MS, Noordzij P, Cirkel GA, Los M, Besselink MG, Busch OR, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, van Dam RM, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Kazemier G, Liem MS, de Meijer VE, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Roos D, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer Resection in Elderly Patients: A Nationwide Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6031-6042. [PMID: 35653069 PMCID: PMC9356963 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11831-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer is growing, however clinical data on the short-term outcomes, rate of adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival in these patients are limited and we therefore performed a nationwide analysis. METHODS Data from the prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit were analyzed, including all patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection between January 2014 and December 2016. Patients were classified into two age groups: <75 and ≥75 years. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher), 90-day mortality, rates of adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival were compared between age groups. Factors associated with start of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival were evaluated with logistic regression and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Of 836 patients, 198 were aged ≥75 years (24%) and 638 were aged <75 years (76%). Median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range [IQR] 31-47). Major complications (31% vs. 28%; p = 0.43) and 90-day mortality (8% vs. 5%; p = 0.18) did not differ. Adjuvant chemotherapy was started in 37% of patients aged ≥75 years versus 69% of patients aged <75 years (p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-18) versus 21 months (95% CI 19-24; p < 0.001). Age ≥75 years was not independently associated with OS (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.79-1.17; p = 0.71), but was associated with a lower rate of adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.40; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The rate of major complications and 90-day mortality after pancreatic resection did not differ between elderly and younger patients; however, elderly patients were less often treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and their OS was shorter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Claire Henry
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs J Schouten
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke S Walma
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Noordzij
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Festen
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwen Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daphne Roos
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schouten TJ, Daamen LA, Dorland G, van Roessel SR, Groot VP, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, Brosens LAA, Busch OR, van Dam RM, Fariña Sarasqueta A, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Intven M, Kazemier G, de Meijer VE, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Raicu GM, Roos D, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, van Velthuysen MF, Verdonk RC, Verheij J, Verkooijen HM, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ. Nationwide Validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System and Five Proposed Modifications for Resected Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5988-5999. [PMID: 35469113 PMCID: PMC9356941 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11664-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic value of four proposed modifications to the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system has yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to validate five proposed modifications. METHODS Patients who underwent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection (2014-2016), as registered in the prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit, were included. Stratification and prognostication of TNM staging systems were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazard analyses, and C-indices. A new modification was composed based on overall survival (OS). RESULTS Overall, 750 patients with a median OS of 18 months (interquartile range 10-32) were included. The 8th edition had an increased discriminative ability compared with the 7th edition {C-index 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.61) vs. 0.56 (95% CI 0.54-0.58)}. Although the 8th edition showed a stepwise decrease in OS with increasing stage, no differences could be demonstrated between all substages; stage IIA vs. IB (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% CI 0.80-2.09; p = 0.29) and stage IIB vs. IIA (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.75-1.83; p = 0.48). The four modifications showed comparable prognostic accuracy (C-index 0.59-0.60); however, OS did not differ between all modified TNM stages (ns). The new modification, migrating T3N1 patients to stage III, showed a C-index of 0.59, but did detect significant survival differences between all TNM stages (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The 8th TNM staging system still lacks prognostic value for some categories of patients, which was not clearly improved by four previously proposed modifications. The modification suggested in this study allows for better prognostication in patients with all stages of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs J. Schouten
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A. Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Galina Dorland
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn R. van Roessel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent P. Groot
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A. Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - Olivier R. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh
- GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E. de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - G. Mihaela Raicu
- Department of Pathology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne Roos
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Robert C. Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - The Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Evolving knowledge in surgical oncology of pancreatic cancer: from theory to clinical practice-a fifteen-year journey at a tertiary referral centre. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1533-1542. [PMID: 36008632 PMCID: PMC9481498 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01346-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an increasing disease having a poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different models of care for pancreatic cancer in a tertiary referral centre in the period 2006-2020. Retrospective study of patients with PDAC observed from January 2006 to December 2020. The demographic and clinical data, and data regarding the imaging techniques used, preoperative staging, management, survival and multidisciplinary tumour board (MDTB) evaluation were collected and compared in three different periods characterised by different organisation of pancreatic cancer services: period A (2006-2010); period B (2011-2015) and period C (2016-2020). One thousand four hundred seven patients were analysed: 441(31.3%) in period A; 413 (29.4%) in B and 553 (39.3%) in C. The proportion of patients increased significantly, from 31.3% to 39.3% (P = 0.032). Body mass index (P = 0.033), comorbidity rate (P = 0.002) and Karnofsky performance status (P < 0.001) showed significant differences. Computed tomography scans (P < 0.001), endoscopic ultrasound (P < 0.001), fine needle aspiration, fine needle biopsy (P < 0.001), and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (P < 0.001) increased; contrast-enhanced ultrasound (P = 0.028) decreased. The cTNM was significantly different (P < 0.001). The MDTB evaluation increased significantly (P < 0.001). Up-front surgery and exploratory laparotomy decreased (P < 0.001), neoadjuvant treatment increased (P < 0.001). The present study showed the evolving knowledge in surgical oncology of pancreatic cancer at a tertiary referral centre over the time. The different models of care of pancreatic cancer, in particular the introduction of the MDTB and the institution of a pancreas unit to the decision-making process seemed to be influential.
Collapse
|
48
|
Schuurmans M, Alves N, Vendittelli P, Huisman H, Hermans J. Setting the Research Agenda for Clinical Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143498. [PMID: 35884559 PMCID: PMC9316850 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide, associated with a 98% loss of life expectancy and a 30% increase in disability-adjusted life years. Image-based artificial intelligence (AI) can help improve outcomes for PDAC given that current clinical guidelines are non-uniform and lack evidence-based consensus. However, research on image-based AI for PDAC is too scattered and lacking in sufficient quality to be incorporated into clinical workflows. In this review, an international, multi-disciplinary team of the world’s leading experts in pancreatic cancer breaks down the patient pathway and pinpoints the current clinical touchpoints in each stage. The available PDAC imaging AI literature addressing each pathway stage is then rigorously analyzed, and current performance and pitfalls are identified in a comprehensive overview. Finally, the future research agenda for clinically relevant, image-driven AI in PDAC is proposed. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), estimated to become the second leading cause of cancer deaths in western societies by 2030, was flagged as a neglected cancer by the European Commission and the United States Congress. Due to lack of investment in research and development, combined with a complex and aggressive tumour biology, PDAC overall survival has not significantly improved the past decades. Cross-sectional imaging and histopathology play a crucial role throughout the patient pathway. However, current clinical guidelines for diagnostic workup, patient stratification, treatment response assessment, and follow-up are non-uniform and lack evidence-based consensus. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can leverage multimodal data to improve patient outcomes, but PDAC AI research is too scattered and lacking in quality to be incorporated into clinical workflows. This review describes the patient pathway and derives touchpoints for image-based AI research in collaboration with a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional expert panel. The literature exploring AI to address these touchpoints is thoroughly retrieved and analysed to identify the existing trends and knowledge gaps. The results show absence of multi-institutional, well-curated datasets, an essential building block for robust AI applications. Furthermore, most research is unimodal, does not use state-of-the-art AI techniques, and lacks reliable ground truth. Based on this, the future research agenda for clinically relevant, image-driven AI in PDAC is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Schuurmans
- Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (H.H.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (N.A.)
| | - Natália Alves
- Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (H.H.)
- Correspondence: (M.S.); (N.A.)
| | - Pierpaolo Vendittelli
- Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (H.H.)
| | - Henkjan Huisman
- Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (P.V.); (H.H.)
| | - John Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lu X, Wu Y, Cao R, Yu X, Gong J. CXCL12 secreted by pancreatic stellate cells accelerates gemcitabine resistance of pancreatic cancer by enhancing glycolytic reprogramming. Anim Cells Syst (Seoul) 2022; 26:148-157. [PMID: 36046033 PMCID: PMC9423839 DOI: 10.1080/19768354.2022.2091019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyu Lu
- The Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences Sichuan Translational Medicine Research Hospital, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yilei Wu
- Department of Medical Records Statistics, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences Sichuan Translational Medicine Research Hospital, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Rui Cao
- Medical University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaojiong Yu
- The Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences Sichuan Translational Medicine Research Hospital, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jun Gong
- The Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences Sichuan Translational Medicine Research Hospital, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cabasag CJ, Arnold M, Rutherford M, Bardot A, Ferlay J, Morgan E, Little A, De P, Dixon E, Woods RR, Saint-Jacques N, Evans S, Engholm G, Elwood M, Merrett N, Ransom D, O'Connell DL, Bray F, Soerjomataram I. Pancreatic cancer survival by stage and age in seven high-income countries (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1774-1782. [PMID: 35236937 PMCID: PMC9174285 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01752-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global burden of pancreatic cancer has steadily increased, while the prognosis after pancreatic cancer diagnosis remains poor. This study aims to compare the stage- and age-specific pancreatic cancer net survival (NS) for seven high-income countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, and United Kingdom. METHODS The study included over 35,000 pancreatic cancer cases diagnosed during 2012-2014, followed through 31 December 2015. The stage- and age-specific NS were calculated using the Pohar-Perme estimator. RESULTS Pancreatic cancer survival estimates were low across all 7 countries, with 1-year NS ranging from 21.1% in New Zealand to 30.9% in Australia, and 3-year NS from 6.6% in the UK to 10.9% in Australia. Most pancreatic cancers were diagnosed with distant stage, ranging from 53.9% in Ireland to 83.3% in New Zealand. While survival differences were evident between countries across all stage categories at one year after diagnosis, this survival advantage diminished, particularly in cases with distant stage. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the importance of stage and age at diagnosis in pancreatic cancer survival. Although progress has been made in improving pancreatic cancer prognosis, the disease is highly fatal and will remain so without major breakthroughs in the early diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Citadel J Cabasag
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
| | - Melina Arnold
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France
| | - Mark Rutherford
- Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK
| | - Aude Bardot
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France
| | - Jacques Ferlay
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France
| | - Eileen Morgan
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France
| | - Alana Little
- Cancer Institute New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Prithwish De
- Surveillance and Cancer Registry, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elijah Dixon
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ryan R Woods
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Sue Evans
- Victorian Cancer Registry Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gerda Engholm
- Cancer Surveillance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mark Elwood
- School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Neil Merrett
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital and School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David Ransom
- Fiona Stanley Hospital and Western Australian Department of Health, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Dianne L O'Connell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Freddie Bray
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France
| | - Isabelle Soerjomataram
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|