First-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Crossing the frontier of age?

Efficacy and Toxicity of Palliative Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with those in younger patients.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC who received FOLFIRINOX or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine at our institution from January 2014 to December 2021 were analyzed. Patients 70 years or older were classified into an elderly group.

RESULTS

The elderly group included 16 patients (26.7%). In the elderly group, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine was used more than FOLFIRINOX compared with the young group (75.0% and 25.0% vs 34.1% and 64.9%, respectively; P = 0.008). The overall survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (15.6 vs 13.4 months, P = 0.259). However, the elderly group showed better progression-free survival (11.4 vs 7.4 months, P = 0.034). The incidence of adverse events including neutropenia (75.0% vs 81.8%, P = 0.716), thrombocytopenia (25.0% vs 31.3%, P = 0.743), and anemia (50.0% vs 43.2%, P = 0.771) was not different between the 2 groups. Peripheral neuropathy was more common in the elderly group (18.3% vs 2.3%, P = 0.054), though not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced PDAC were comparable with those in younger patients.

Management of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

Systemic chemotherapy plays important role in pancreatic cancer not only for palliative treatment of unresectable disease, but also for neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of resectable disease. Most clinical trials of systemic chemotherapy have been conducted in non-elderly patients, and the results cannot always be extrapolated to elderly patients because of the uniqueness of this population. The number of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer has increased in an aging society; therefore, there is an urgent need to develop specific treatments for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine or S-1 monotherapy is generally considered appropriate even for vulnerable elderly patients. FOLFIRINOX is considered inapplicable based on its safety profile. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil plus folinic acid can be administered to elderly patients, because the phase III trials have shown the efficacy and safety for patients including those who were 75 years or older. However, the feasibility of these therapies for elderly patients is still under debate since the number of elderly populations was relatively small in these studies. To determine the indication for these regimens in the elderly, the background of each patient should be considered. Geriatric assessment such as the Geriatric 8 and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index can identify vulnerabilities and are therefore recommended in daily clinical practice as well as in clinical studies of elderly patients. It is expected that geriatric assessment will elucidate the eligibility criteria for those regimens in elderly individuals. Randomized clinical trials are ongoing to establish a standard treatment in the vulnerable elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer, who cannot tolerate the same regimen as in the non-elderly patients.

Neglected geriatric assessment and overtreatment of older patients with pancreatic cancer - Results from a prospective phase IV clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer may suffer increased toxicity from intensive chemotherapy. Treatment individualization by geriatric assessment (GA) might improve functional outcome.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, phase IV, open label trial in patients ≥70 years with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients underwent GA and were assigned to one of three categories based on their scores: Go-Go, Slow-Go, or Frail. These categories were intended to guide physician's treatment decisions when choosing to treat patients with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (arm A), gemcitabine (arm B), or best supportive care (arm C). Primary objective was a stable (loss of five points or less) Barthel's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score during chemotherapy; secondary endpoints included GA scores during therapy, safety, quality of life, response and survival rates.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the trial in six centers in Germany (out of 135 planned), resulting in termination due to low recruitment. Fifteen patients were allocated to nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, fifteen to gemcitabine, and two to best supportive care by their physicians, although according to their GA scores 29 patients (91%) were categorized as Slow-Go and three (9%) as Go-Go. Thus, fifteen of 32 (47%) patients were misclassified and given a course of treatment inconsistent with their GA scores. Median progression-free survival (PFS) were 3.3 months and 9.1 months and median time to quality-of-life deterioration 13 days and 29 days in the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and gemcitabine monotherapy arms, respectively. Serious adverse events were reported in 11 (78.6%) patients in the nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine and 8 (53.3%) patients in the gemcitabine arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical evaluations by investigators differed markedly from geriatric assessments, leading to potential overtreatment. In our modest sample size study, those patients undergoing more intensive therapy had a less favorable course.

Impact of sarcopenia on prediction of progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sarcopenia is an important prognostic factor for cancer patients. Here, we assessed the effects of sarcopenia on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent treatment with first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM and nab-PTX).

METHODS

The study enrolled patients with unresectable PDAC who underwent chemotherapy between April 2016 and May 2020. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar spine level (L3) was calculated from computed tomography (CT) images. Propensity score analysis was used to compare PFS and OS in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine variables significantly associated with prognosis.

RESULTS

Of the 176 patients who received first-line GEM and nab-PTX, 84 were selected and divided into two groups of 42 (the sarcopenia and the non-sarcopenia groups) by propensity score matching. The median PFS of the sarcopenia and the non-sarcopenia groups was 5.0 and 8.0 months, respectively (p = 0.004). The median OS was 10.3 and 18.1 months, respectively (p = 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that sarcopenia was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS (p = 0.004, p = 0.001, respectively). The rates of major grade 3 or 4 AEs were significantly higher in the sarcopenia group (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia is an independent indicator of a poor prognosis in patients with PDAC treated with first-line GEM and nab-PTX.

Treatment Paradigms for Older Adults with Pancreatic Cancer: a Nuanced Approach

Pancreatic cancer is increasing in incidence in the USA. This disease disproportionately affects older adults, and as the percentage of adults > 65 years old increases with the aging of the baby boomers, the prevalence is expected to rise over the coming decade. These patients are often more susceptible to disease-related symptoms and have less ability to withstand both cancer and treatment-related side effects. Therefore, it is imperative that treating physicians thoughtfully consider their recommended treatment approach towards this vulnerable patient population. This review focuses on the current state of research of older adults with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, highlighting deficiencies in the representation of this patient population in clinical trials. It is vital that the treating physicians take a nuanced approach towards therapy of localized and metastatic disease in geriatric patients. A one size fits all treatment algorithm is no longer appropriate in any cancer patient, let alone the elders who are particularly vulnerable to developing treatment-related toxicities. To help guide therapy decisions, it is important to perform a comprehensive geriatric assessment which may uncover unexpected frailty and lead to a change in the recommended treatment approach. In this way, we can support older adults during therapy for this aggressive malignancy and provide optimal care.

Dosing Schedules of Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel for Older Adults With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Background

Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GA) is a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPDAC). The traditional dosing schedule of GA is days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Frequently, older adults are given a modified dosing schedule using 2 doses per cycle because of toxicity. We retrospectively analyzed treatment patterns and outcomes of older adults with mPDAC given these 2 dosing schedules.

Methods

Patients 65 years or older with mPDAC treated with GA in a nationwide real-world database between January 1, 2014, and May 31, 2019, were included. Demographic, disease, and treatment information were collected. Patients were grouped by dosing at treatment initiation (traditional vs modified dosing schedules). Endpoints were time on treatment (TOT) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving at least 2 cycles. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

Results

1317 patients were included (traditional dosing schedule: n = 842; modified dosing schedule: n = 475). Median age at diagnosis was 72 and 73 years for traditional and modified dosing schedules, respectively (P < .001), but sex, race, and performance status were not statistically significantly different. The median TOT and OS were better for the traditional vs modified dosing schedule (unadjusted median TOT, first-line = 4.18 vs 3.26 mo, P =.04; OS = 9.44 vs 7.63 mo, P =.003).

Conclusion

In this real-world cohort, treatment of older mPDAC patients with a modified dosing schedule of GA resulted in shorter TOT and worse OS vs a traditional dosing schedule. With the caveats of potential confounding that exist in a nonrandomized retrospective database, these results suggest that dose intensity may be important, and prospective studies are necessary to ensure we treat our patients most effectively.

The Impact of Thromboprophylaxis on the Survival of Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. The Pancreatic Cancer and Tinzaparin (PaCT) Study

Simple Summary

Pancreatic cancer (PaC) induces a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable state. Thrombosis occurs in 20% of PaC patients and is associated with worse prognosis and reduced progression-free survival (PFS). The aim of this retrospective observational study (PaCT) was to investigate the effect of thromboprophylaxis with an intermediate dose of tinzaparin on the PFS of patients treated with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Data obtained from 110 patients with active PaC administered prophylaxis with tinzaparin during the study resulted in median PFS of 7.9 months; data for the PFS of patients without simultaneous anticoagulation were obtained bibliographically from 14 studies, and after applying meta-analysis was 5.6 months. Patients receiving anticoagulation with tinzaparin had 39.5% higher PFS than patients without such thromboprophylaxis (p < 0.05). During follow-up, three (2.7%) thrombotic events and two (1.9%) clinically relevant non-major bleeding events occurred. Concluding, PFS in advanced PaC patients undergoing chemotherapy was positively impacted by thromboprophylaxis with intermediate dose tinzaparin.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PaC) induces a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable state. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of tinzaparin in combination with chemotherapy. The PaCT (pancreatic cancer and tinzaparin) study was a retrospective observational study that collected data regarding progression free survival (PFS) in advanced or metastatic PaC patients who received thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin during chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel (N) and gemcitabine (G). The primary end point was to compare, from already published data, the PFS of patients receiving thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin with the PFS of patients receiving chemotherapy with N–G but no thromboprophylaxis. Secondary end points were efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. In total, 110 PaC patients, 93% with advanced or metastatic disease, treated with N–G and tinzaparin (10,291 ± 1176 Anti-Xa IU, OD, median duration 8.7, IQR: 5.6–11.9 months) were enrolled. Of these, 52% were males and; the median age was 68 (40–86 years). The tumor was located to in the pancreatic head at in 45% of the patients. The median PFS was 7.9 months (IQR: 5.0–11.8 months). Out of 14 similar studies (involving 2994 patients) identified via systematic search, it was determined that the weighted PFS of patients receiving N–G but no anticoagulation was 5.6 months. Therefore, patients receiving tinzaparin had 39.54% higher PFS than patients without thromboprophylaxis (p < 0.05). During the follow-up period of 18.3 ± 11.7 months, three (2.7%) thrombotic events were recorded while two clinically relevant non-major bleeding events occurred (1.9%). In conclusion, PFS in advanced PaC patients undergoing chemotherapy is positively impacted by anticoagulation. Thromboprophylaxis with tinzaparin in treatment dose is efficient and safe.

Efficacy and tolerance of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) among elderly patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included all consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with histologically proven PDAC who received at least one cycle of GnP (January 2014 to May 2018) in four academic centers. The primary endpoints were toxicity and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate. We compared patients aged ≥ or <75 years.

RESULTS

The study included 127 patients; among them 42 (33.1%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Fifty-seven and seventy patients received GnP as the first-line and the second-line treatment or beyond, respectively. Sixty-seven patients had at least one grade 3/4 adverse event, the most frequent being neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. No deaths were related to toxicity. OS (median, 8.0 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.8-10.2) and PFS (median, 5.5 months; 95% CI, 4.8-6.2) were similar for patients aged <75 or ≥75 years in the whole cohort and among patients receiving GnP as the first-line treatment. Cephalic PDAC, liver metastases, hypoalbuminemia, and GnP received beyond the first-line were associated with a significantly shorter OS on the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

GnP is well tolerated and effective in elderly patients with advanced PDAC, even patients aged ≥75 years. The data from daily clinical practice are consistent with the results reported with first-line treatment and highlight the relevance of GnP administration in elderly patients.

Comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in elderly versus younger patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Analysis of a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PC) ranks among the deadliest malignancies worldwide. In the MPACT study, first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) demonstrated activity (median overall survival [OS], 8.7 months) and tolerability in patients with metastatic PC (mPC). However, the clinical evidence of nab-P/G in the elderly (>70 years), who account for the majority of patients with mPC, is limited. This is the first prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study evaluating the tolerability and effectiveness of nab-P/G in younger (≤70 years) versus elderly (>70 years) patients with mPC in the daily clinical routine.

METHODS

Eligible patients with mPC were treated with nab-P/G and observed until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability of nab-P/G, and the secondary objectives were efficacy and real-life dosing.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients with mPC (median age, 70 years) were recruited, of which 299, aged ≤70 (n = 162) and >70 (n = 137) years, were eligible for analysis. Baseline characteristics and the safety profile were comparable between the groups. However, fatigue (22.8% versus 13.0%) and decreased appetite (8.8% versus 1.2%) were more frequent in elderly patients. Younger versus elderly patients equally benefited in terms of objective response rate (36% versus 48%), median progression-free survival (5.6 versus 5.5 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03; p = 0.81) and OS (10.6 versus 10.2 months; HR = 0.89; p = 0.4). In addition, the median treatment duration (5 versus 4 cycles), relative dose intensity (70% versus 74%) or reasons for treatment discontinuation were similar. Most patients (56.2% versus 47.4%) benefited from a second-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

This prospective real-world analysis confirms the feasibility and tolerability of nab-P/G treatment and reveals OS data similar for younger patients and elderly patients aged >70 years. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT02555813.

AUSTRIAN NIS REGISTRY

NIS005071.