Cancer predisposition syndromes as a risk factor for early second primary neoplasms after childhood cancer – A national cohort study

Hodgkin lymphoma and Ewing sarcoma in pediatric patient carrying germline PALB2 variant: a case report and literature review

Germinal predisposition to malignancy is found in approximately 10% of oncological pediatric patients. As awareness of cancer risk factors associated with germline mutations increases, and with advancements in molecular techniques, more carefully selected patients are being tested. This approach enables the identification of new variants-both those that are clearly linked to tumorigenesis and candidates, which biological role needs to be functionally verified. Pathogenic variants within cancer-predisposing genes not only increase nearly eightfold the risk of secondary cancers but also may be associated with excessive toxicity of antineoplastic treatment. We present the case of a girl who developed classical Hodgkin lymphoma at the age of 8 years and secondary Ewing sarcoma at the age of 16 years. Her father was diagnosed with classical Hodgkin lymphoma at the age of 27 years. Genetic testing revealed the carriership of a germline heterozygous variant in the PALB2 gene (NM_024675.4:c.110G>A, p.Arg37His) in both the patient and her father. Since the patient was exposed to chemotherapy due to lymphoma prior to the development of secondary malignancy and the variant is classified as an aberration of unknown significance, the causative role of the PALB2 variant remains uncertain. Nevertheless, the presented case may indicate the possible interplay between inherited genetic predisposition and the exposure to cytostatic drugs, which both are involved in promoting secondary cancers in pediatric patients.

The risk and distribution of second primary cancers according to subsite of primary stomach cancer: a retrospective cohort population-based study

Background

The development of second primary cancers (SPCs) following a diagnosis of stomach cancer presents a significant clinical challenge, with varying risks depending on the anatomic subsite of the primary tumor, patient demographics, and treatment modalities. This study aims to assess the risk of SPCs in stomach cancer survivors, focusing on differences across anatomic subsites, sex, age, and treatment periods.

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from stomach cancer patients, analyzing the incidence of SPCs based on the anatomic location of the primary tumor, with stratifications by sex, age, latency period, and year of diagnosis. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare the observed SPC rates with those expected in the general population.

Results

Elevated stomach SPC risk was observed across most anatomic subsites, particularly in the body (SIR 8.84) and fundus (SIR 7.34). Females exhibited higher SIRs compared to males, especially in the fundus (SIR 13.33 for females vs. 4.55 for males). Younger patients (<50 years) had significantly higher SPC risks, particularly for cancers originating in the fundus (SIR 49.56). Notably, patients diagnosed after 2010 showed the highest SIRs, indicating a potential impact of advances in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Nonstomach SPCs, including colorectal, lung, and thyroid cancers, were significantly elevated, with distinct patterns based on the primary tumor site.

Conclusions

The study highlights the critical role of primary tumor location, sex, age, and treatment era in determining SPC risk in stomach cancer survivors. These findings underscore the need for tailored surveillance strategies to manage long-term cancer risks in this population.

The Prevalence of Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs) in Children with a Neoplasm: A Cohort Study in a Central and Eastern European Population

IMPORTANCE

The etiology of pediatric cancers is often unclear; however, advancements in genetics have identified significant roles for genetic disorders in their development. Over time, the number of cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs) and awareness of them have increased, providing the possibility of cancer prevention and early detection.

PURPOSE

In this study, we present data concerning the number and type of oncological cases and their correlation with CPS occurrence in a cohort of Central and Eastern European pediatric patients.

MATERIALS

The data were collected between 2000 and 2019 at the Karol Jonscher Clinical Hospital of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, resulting in a cohort of 2190 cases in total, of which 193 children (8.81%) were confirmed to have a CPS.

RESULTS

CPSs occurred most frequently in infancy (22.90% of all children suffering from any diagnosed cancer during the first year of life; p < 0.0001), accounting for more than one-quarter of all CPS cases in our cohort. CPSs were least likely to be observed in patients aged 14 and 15 years (2.17% and 2.44% of children diagnosed with any of the listed cancers at the exact age, respectively; p < 0.05). Among CPSs, the most common were neurofibromatosis type I (NF1), Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), and Down syndrome (DS).

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, it is important to emphasize the need for personalized treatment for each patient affected by both CPSs and subsequent cancer in order to reduce the toxicity of therapy and improve quality of life by reducing the risk of side effects.

Genetic Predisposition to Sarcoma: What Should Clinicians Know?

OPINION STATEMENT

Pathogenic germline variants in the setting of several associated cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) may lead to the development of sarcoma. We would consider testing for a CPS in patients with a strong family history of cancer, multiple primary malignancies, and/or pediatric/adolescent/young adult patients diagnosed with other malignancies strongly associated with CPS. When a CPS is diagnosed in a patient with sarcoma, additional treatment considerations and imaging options for those patients are required. This applies particularly to the use of radiation therapy, ionizing radiation with diagnostic imaging, and the use of alkylating chemotherapy. As data and guidelines are currently lacking for many of these scenarios, we have adopted a shared decision-making process with patients and their families. If the best chance for cure in a patient with CPS requires utilization of radiation therapy or alkylating chemotherapy, we discuss the risks with the patient but do not omit these modalities. However, if there are treatment options that yield equivalent survival rates, yet avoid these modalities, we elect for those options. Considering staging imaging and post-therapy evaluation for sarcoma recurrence, we avoid surveillance techniques that utilize ionizing radiation when possible but do not completely omit them when their use is indicated.

Tandem High-Dose Chemotherapy Increases the Risk of Secondary Malignant Neoplasm in Pediatric Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN) in pediatric solid tumors, focusing on the effects of tandem high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (aged < 19 years) diagnosed with or treated for pediatric solid tumors between 1994 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The cumulative incidence of SMN was estimated using competing risk methods by considering death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

A total of 1,435 patients (413 with brain tumors and 1,022 with extracranial solid tumors) were enrolled. Seventy-one patients developed 74 SMNs, with a 10-year and 20-year cumulative incidence of 2.680±0.002% and 10.193±0.024%, respectively. The types of SMN included carcinoma in 28 (37.8%), sarcoma in 24 (32.4%), and hematologic malignancy in 15 (20.3%) cases. Osteosarcoma and thyroid carcinoma were the most frequently diagnosed tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that radiotherapy (RT) > 2, 340 cGy, and tandem HDCT were significant risk factors for SMN development. The SMN types varied according to the primary tumor type; carcinoma was the most frequent SMN in brain tumors and neuroblastoma, whereas hematologic malignancy and sarcomas developed more frequently in patients with sarcoma and retinoblastoma, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The cumulative incidence of SMN in pediatric patients with solid tumors was considerably high, especially in patients who underwent tandem HDCT or in those who received RT > 2,340 cGy. Therefore, the treatment intensity should be optimized based on individual risk assessment and the long-term follow-up of pediatric cancer survivors.

Subsequent cancers within 5 years from initial diagnosis of childhood cancer. Patterns and risks in the population of Great Britain

BACKGROUND

Patterns and risks of subsequent primary tumours (SPTs) among long-term survivors of childhood cancer have been extensively described, but much less is known about early SPTs (ESPTs) occurring within 5 years after initial diagnosis.

PROCEDURE

We carried out a population-based study of ESPTs following childhood cancer throughout Britain, using the National Registry of Childhood Tumours. The full study series comprised all ESPTs occurring among 56,620 children whose initial cancer diagnosis was in the period 1971-2010. Frequencies of ESPT were calculated for the entire cohort. For analyses of risk, follow-up began 92 days after initial diagnosis.

RESULTS

ESPT developed in 0.4% of children overall, 0.52% of those initially diagnosed at age less than 1 year and 0.38% of those diagnosed at age 1-14 years. Standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was 7.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7-8.9), overall 9.5 (95% CI: 7.1-12.5) for children initially diagnosed in 1981-1990 and 6.5-7.5 for those from earlier and later decades. SIR by type of first cancer ranged from 4.4 (95% CI: 1.8-9.1) for Wilms tumour to 13.1 (95% CI: 7.7-21.0) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. SIR by type of ESPT ranged from 2.0 (95% CI: 1.0-3.4) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia to 66.6 (95% CI: 52.3-83.6) for acute myeloid leukaemia. Predisposition syndromes were known to be implicated in 21% of children with ESPT and suspected in another 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an overview of the patterns and risks of ESPTs in a large population where many children received therapy that is still in widespread use. Further research will be needed to monitor and understand changes in risk as childhood cancer treatment continues to evolve.

Diagnostic Strategies and Algorithms for Investigating Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in Children Presenting with Malignancy

Simple Summary

Here we provide an overview of several genetically determined conditions that predispose to the development of solid and hematologic malignancies in children. Diagnosing these conditions, whose prevalence is estimated around 10% in children with cancer, is useful to warrant personalized oncologic treatment and follow-up, as well as psychological and genetic counseling to these children and their families. We reviewed the most recent studies focusing on the prevalence of cancer predisposition syndromes in cancer-bearing children and the most-used clinical screening tools. Our work highlighted the value of clinical screening tools in the management of young cancer patients, especially in settings where genetic testing is not promptly accessible.

Abstract

In the past recent years, the expanding use of next-generation sequencing has led to the discovery of new cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs), which are now known to be responsible for up to 10% of childhood cancers. As knowledge in the field is in constant evolution, except for a few “classic” CPSs, there is no consensus about when and how to perform germline genetic diagnostic studies in cancer-bearing children. Several clinical screening tools have been proposed to help identify the patients who carry higher risk, with heterogeneous strategies and results. After introducing the main clinical and molecular features of several CPSs predisposing to solid and hematological malignancies, we compare the available clinical evidence on CPS prevalence in pediatric cancer patients and on the most used decision-support tools in identifying the patients who could benefit from genetic counseling and/or direct genetic testing. This analysis highlighted that a personalized stepwise approach employing clinical screening tools followed by sequencing in high-risk patients might be a reasonable and cost-effective strategy in the care of children with cancer.

Second primary malignancies induced by radioactive iodine treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma - a critical review and evaluation of the existing evidence

PURPOSE

Concern is growing about long-term side effects of differentiated thyroid cancer treatment, most notably radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. However, published studies on the subject have had heterogeneous cohorts and conflicting results. This review seeks to provide an updated evaluation of published evidence, and to elucidate the risk of second primary malignancies (SPMs), especially secondary hematologic malignancies (SHMs), attributable to RAI therapy.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE and In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and PubMed. Studies regarding RAI-induced SPMs or a dose-response relationship between RAI therapy and SPMs were identified, 10 of which were eligible for the analysis. We evaluated risk of bias in each study and judged quality of evidence (QOE) across all studies using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach.

RESULTS

For the outcome "SPM", the relative effect (relative risk, hazard ratio, or odds ratio) of RAI vs. no RAI ranged from 1.14 to 1.84 across studies, but most results were not statistically significant. For the outcome "SHM", reported relative effects ranged from 1.30 to 2.50, with 2/3 of the studies presenting statistically significant results. In 7/8 of the studies, increased risk for SPM was shown with increasing cumulative RAI activity. QOE was "very low" regarding SPM after RAI and regarding a dose-response relationship, and "low" for SHM after RAI.

CONCLUSION

Based on low quality evidence, an excess risk for the development of SPM cannot be excluded but is expected to be small.

Better Prognosis and Survival in Esophageal Cancer Survivors After Comorbid Second Primary Malignancies: A SEER Database-Based Study

Background

With the development of surgical techniques and advances in systemic treatments, the survival time of esophageal cancer survivors has increased; however, the chance of developing a second primary malignancy (SPM) has also increased. These patients’ prognosis and treatment plans remain inconclusive.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate and predict the survival of patients with esophageal cancer with second primary tumors, to provide insights and the latest data on whether to pursue more aggressive treatment.

Materials and Methods

We selected esophageal cancer cases from the latest available data from the SEER database on April 15, 2021. We performed life table analysis, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the patient data. We conducted multiple Cox regression equation analyses under multiple covariate adjustment models, and performed a stratified analysis of multiple Cox regression equation analysis based on different covariates. To describe our study population more simply and clearly, we defined the group of patients with esophageal cancer combined with a second primary malignant tumor (the first of two or more primaries) as the EC-SPM group.

Results

Our analysis of 73,456 patients with esophageal cancer found the median survival time of the EC-SPM group was 47.00 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 43.87–50.13), and the mean survival time was 74.67 months (95% CI, 72.12–77.22). Kaplan–Meier curves of different esophageal cancer survivors showed that the survival of the EC-SPM group was significantly better than that of the other groups (p < 0.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that compared with only one malignancy only group, the hazard ratio (HR) of the EC-SPM group was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92–0.99; p < 0.05). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis under different adjustment models, the EC-SPM group had a reduced risk of death compared with the one primary malignancy only group (HR < 1, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Survivors of esophageal cancer with a second primary malignant cancer have a better prognosis, but require more aggressive treatment. This study provided new evidence and new ideas for future research on the pathophysiological mechanism and treatment concepts of esophageal cancer combined with SPM.

Predictors for participation in DNA self-sampling of childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Research on germline genetic variants relies on enough eligible participants which is difficult to achieve for rare diseases such as childhood cancer. With self-collection kits, participants can contribute genetic samples conveniently from their home. Demographic and clinical factors were identified previously that influenced participation in mailed self-collection. People with pre-existing heritable diagnoses might participate differently in germline DNA collection which might render sampling biased in this group. In this nationwide cross-sectional study, we analysed predictive factors of participation in DNA self-collection including heritable diagnoses.

METHODS

We identified childhood cancer survivors from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry for invitation to germline DNA self-sampling in September 2019. Participants received saliva sampling kits by postal mail at their home, were asked to fill them, sign an informed consent, and send them back by mail. Two reminders were sent to non-participants by mail. We compared demographic, clinical, and treatment information of participants with non-participants using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

We invited 928 childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland with a median age of 26.5 years (interquartile range 19-37), of which 463 (50%) participated. After the initial send out of the sampling kit, 291 (63%) had participated, while reminder letters led to 172 additional participants (37%). Foreign nationality (odds ratio [OR] 0.5; 95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.7), survivors aged 30-39 years at study versus other age groups (OR 0.5; CI 0.4-0.8), and survivors with a known cancer predisposition syndrome (OR 0.5; CI 0.3-1.0) were less likely to participate in germline DNA collection. Survivors with a second primary neoplasm (OR 1.9; CI 1.0-3.8) or those living in a French or Italian speaking region (OR 1.3; CI 1.0-1.8) tended to participate more.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that half of childhood cancer survivors participated in germline DNA self-sampling relying completely on mailing of sample kits. Written reminders increased the response by about one third. More targeted recruitment strategies may be advocated for people of foreign nationality, aged 30-39 years, and those with cancer predisposition syndromes. Perceptions of genetic research and potential barriers to participation of survivors need to be better understood.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Biobank: https://directory.bbmri-eric.eu/#/collection/bbmri-eric:ID:CH_HopitauxUniversitairesGeneve:collection:CH_BaHOP Research project : Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04702321 .

The risk and prognosis of secondary primary malignancy in lung cancer: a population-based study

Aim: To assess and predict risk and prognosis of lung cancer (LC) patients with second primary malignancy (SPM). Methods: LC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2016 were obtained through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated to evaluate SPM risk. Cox regression and competing risk models were applied to assess the factors associated with overall survival, SPM development and LC-specific survival. Nomograms were built to predict SPM probability and overall survival. Results & conclusion: LC patients remain at higher risk of SPM even though the incidence declines. Patients with SPM have a better prognosis than patients without SPM. The consistency indexes for nomograms of SPM probability and overall survival are 0.605 (95% CI: 0.598-0.611) and 0.644 (95% CI: 0.638-0.650), respectively.