1
|
Kohjimoto Y, Uemura H, Yoshida M, Hinotsu S, Takahashi S, Takeuchi T, Suzuki K, Shinmoto H, Tamada T, Inoue T, Sugimoto M, Takenaka A, Habuchi T, Ishikawa H, Mizowaki T, Saito S, Miyake H, Matsubara N, Nonomura N, Sakai H, Ito A, Ukimura O, Matsuyama H, Hara I. Japanese clinical practice guidelines for prostate cancer 2023. Int J Urol 2024. [PMID: 39078210 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
This fourth edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer 2023 is compiled. It was revised under the leadership of the Japanese Urological Association, with members selected from multiple academic societies and related organizations (Japan Radiological Society, Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology, the Department of EBM and guidelines, Japan Council for Quality Health Care (Minds), Japanese Society of Pathology, and the patient group (NPO Prostate Cancer Patients Association)), in accordance with the Minds Manual for Guideline Development (2020 ver. 3.0). The most important feature of this revision is the adoption of systematic reviews (SRs) in determining recommendations for 14 clinical questions (CQs). Qualitative SRs for these questions were conducted, and the final recommendations were made based on the results through the votes of 24 members of the guideline development group. Five algorithms based on these results were also created. Contents not covered by the SRs, which are considered textbook material, have been described in the general statement. In the general statement, a literature search for 14 areas was conducted; then, based on the general statement and CQs of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer 2016, the findings revealed after the 2016 guidelines were mainly described. This article provides an overview of these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Kohjimoto
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Chiba, Japan
- Department of EBM and Guidelines, Japan Council for Quality Health Care (Minds), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Hinotsu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Management, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Satoru Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- NPO Prostate Cancer Patients Association, Takarazuka, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Shinmoto
- Department of Radiology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Tamada
- Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - Mikio Sugimoto
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shiro Saito
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Center Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Division of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Matsubara
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideki Sakai
- Department of Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
- Nagasaki Rosai Hospital, Sasebo, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Osamu Ukimura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
- Department of Urology, JA Yamaguchi Kouseiren Nagato General Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Isao Hara
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shore ND, Antonarakis ES, Ross AE, Marshall CH, Stratton KL, Ayanambakkam A, Cookson MS, McKay RR, Bryce AH, Kaymakcalan MD. A multidisciplinary approach to address unmet needs in the management of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00803-5. [PMID: 38431761 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00803-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the availability of second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (SGARIs), the treatment landscape has changed dramatically for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). In clinical trials, the SGARIs (apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide) increased metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and patient quality of life compared to placebo. These drugs were subsequently integrated into nmCRPC clinical practice guidelines. With advances in radiographic imaging, disease assessment, and patient monitoring, nmCRPC strategies are evolving to address limitations related to tracking disease progression using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics. METHODS A panel of 10 multidisciplinary experts in prostate cancer conducted reviews and discussions of unmet needs in the management and monitoring of patients with nmCRPC in order to develop consensus recommendations. RESULTS Across the SGARI literature, patient MFS and OS are generally comparable for all treatments, but important distinctions exist regarding short- and long-term drug safety profiles and drug-drug interactions. With respect to disease monitoring, a substantial proportion of patients using SGARIs may experience disease progression without rising PSA levels, suggesting a need for enhanced radiographic imaging in addition to PSA monitoring. Recent data also indicate that novel prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography radiotracers provide enhanced accuracy for disease detection, as compared to conventional imaging. CONCLUSIONS Clinical decision-making in nmCRPC has become more complex, with new opportunities to apply precision medicine to patient care. Multidisciplinary teams can ensure that patients with nmCRPC receive optimal and individualized disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ashley E Ross
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Kelly L Stratton
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | | | - Michael S Cookson
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ong CSH, Law YXT, Kyaw L, Lim QY, Loke T, Wu QH, Tiong HY, Chiong E. Cardiovascular risks of androgen receptor targeted agents in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00792-5. [PMID: 38267540 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00792-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Androgen receptor targeted agents (ARTA) have increasingly been incorporated into treatment regimens for various stages of prostate cancer. Patients are living longer with prostate cancer, and thus have a higher cumulative exposure to the treatment and its accompanying side effects, especially those of cardiovascular disease. We aim to assess the differences in the incidence of cardiac-related adverse events after treatment of prostate cancer with ARTA versus placebo. METHODS Three databases were thoroughly searched for relevant articles. The PICOS model was used to frame our clinical question, with which 2 independent authors went through several rounds of screening to select the final included studies. Meta-analysis was done using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method. Quality assessment was carried out with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool RoB 2. RESULTS The use of ARTA in prostate cancer increases the incidence of cardiac-related adverse events (RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.29-1.90, p < 0.00001), such as hypertension (RR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.46-1.97, p < 0.00001), ischaemic heart disease (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.36-2.50, p < 0.0001), and arrhythmia (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11-1.71, p = 0.004), although this did not manifest in an increased incidence of cardiac arrests/deaths (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.87-1.88, p = 0.21). DISCUSSION ARTA increases the risk of cardiac-related adverse events, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and arrhythmia. Armed with this knowledge, we will be better poised to manage cardiac risks accordingly and involve a cardiologist as required when starting patients on ARTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Shu Hui Ong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Yu Xi Terence Law
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lin Kyaw
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qi Yang Lim
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tim Loke
- Division of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qing Hui Wu
- Raffles Urology Centre, Raffles Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ho Yee Tiong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Edmund Chiong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hadfield MJ, Lyall V, Holle LM, Dennison M. Updates in the Treatment of Non-Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Benefit of Second-Generation Androgen Receptor Antagonists. Ann Pharmacother 2023; 57:1302-1311. [PMID: 36840339 DOI: 10.1177/10600280231155441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and considerations for use, of second-generation androgen receptor (AR) antagonists in treatment of nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (M0CRPC). DATA SOURCES Conducted search in PubMed and Google scholar (January, 1, 2002-December 31, 2022), using relevant terms. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Relevant English-language studies, conducted in humans evaluating second-generation AR antagonists for M0CRPC, and additional articles and package inserts were considered. DATA SYNTHESIS Apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide are effective in delaying the time to development of metastatic prostate cancer in men with M0CRPC with a rapid prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (<10 months). No head-to-head, randomized, clinical trials have been conducted. The most common adverse effects include fatigue and hypertension, and quality of life is maintained in most patients. Cost is similar among the agents (~$15,000/month). Drug-drug interactions vary among these agents and should be considered, when selecting therapy as well as likely adherence. Darolutamide is administered twice daily with the others once daily. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE Second-generation AR antagonists are effective in reducing time to development of metastatic disease and prolonging overall survival in patients with M0CRPC and a PSA doubling time of <10 months. Recent imaging advances may alter how we evaluate outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Second-generation AR antagonists improve disease control and overall survival. Generally, they are well tolerated and QOL is maintained. Selection of the best agent is based on the adverse effect profile, potential for drug- and disease-interactions, administration, cost, and patient preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Hadfield
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Vikram Lyall
- Section of Urology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Lisa M Holle
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Morgan Dennison
- University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fizazi K, Shore ND, Smith M, Ramos R, Jones R, Niegisch G, Vjaters E, Wang Y, Srinivasan S, Sarapohja T, Verholen F. Efficacy and safety outcomes of darolutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with comorbidities and concomitant medications from the randomised phase 3 ARAMIS trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 192:113258. [PMID: 37660438 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the Androgen Receptor Antagonizing Agent for Metastasis-free Survival (ARAMIS) trial, darolutamide significantly improved median metastasis-free survival by nearly 2 years and reduced the risk of death by 31% versus placebo, with a favourable safety/tolerability profile. This post hoc analysis of ARAMIS evaluated efficacy and safety in patients by number of comorbidities and concomitant medications. METHODS Patients with nmCRPC were randomised 2:1 to darolutamide (n = 955) or placebo (n = 554) while continuing androgen-deprivation therapy. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated in subgroups by median numbers of ongoing comorbidities and concomitant medications. HRs were determined from univariate analysis using Cox regression. FINDINGS Median numbers of comorbidities and concomitant medications were 6 and 10, respectively, with 41.6% of patients having >6 comorbidities and 48.8% taking >10 concomitant medications. For patients with ≤ 6 and >6 comorbidities, darolutamide increased OS versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65 and 0.73, respectively), and this benefit was consistent for cardiovascular, metabolic, and other comorbidities (HR range: 0.39-0.88). For patients taking ≤ 10 and >10 concomitant medications, increased OS was also observed with darolutamide versus placebo (HR 0.76 and 0.66, respectively), and the benefit was consistent across medication classes (HR range: 0.45-0.80). Incidences of TEAEs and TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation with darolutamide were similar to placebo across subgroups by numbers of comorbidities and concomitant medications. CONCLUSIONS The OS benefit and safety of darolutamide remained consistent with that observed in the overall ARAMIS population, even in patients with high numbers of comorbidities or concomitant medications. CLINICALTRIALS GOV REGISTRATION NCT02200614. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Darolutamide increased overall survival versus placebo, and incidences of most adverse events were similar between treatments in patients with ≤ 6 or >6 comorbidities and those taking ≤ 10 or >10 concomitant medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center/Genesis Care, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Genitourinary Malignancies Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rodrigo Ramos
- Departamento de Cirurgia, Instituto Português de Oncologia, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Robert Jones
- University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Günter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Egils Vjaters
- Urological Center, P. Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Yuan Wang
- Global Medical Affairs, Oncology, Bayer Healthcare, Whippany, New Jersey, USA
| | - Shankar Srinivasan
- Global Medical Affairs, Oncology, Bayer Healthcare, Whippany, New Jersey, USA
| | - Toni Sarapohja
- Clinical Operations and Data Science, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland
| | - Frank Verholen
- Global Medical Affairs, Oncology, Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jardim DL, Gonçalves E Silva A, Pompeo ASFL, Sarkis AS, Cardoso APG, Sasse AD, Fay AP, Soares A, Pompeo ACL, Carneiro A, Kann AG, Fogassa C, De Freitas CH, Chade DC, Herchenhorn D, De Almeida DVP, Da Rosa DAR, Wiermann EG, Schutz FAB, Kater FR, De Moura F, Korkes F, Meyer F, De Oliveira FNG, Sabino F, Almeida GL, Avanço G, Guimaraes GC, Lemos GC, Carvalhal GF, Kim H, Morbeck IP, Campagnari JC, Rinck JA, Da Ponte JRT, Da Trindade KM, Atem L, Borges L, Nogueira LM, Batista LTEA, Maia MC, Sadi MV, Rocha MAA, Luz MDA, Smaletz O, Lages PSM, Matuda RMK, Reis RBD, Indio RF, Fernandes RDC, Cavallero SR, Souza VC, Busato W, Alfer W, Maluf F. "Non-metastatic, Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Treatment Recommendations by an Expert Panel from Brazil". Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:e58-e69. [PMID: 36266221 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an important clinical stage of prostate cancer, prior to morbidity and mortality from clinical metastases. In particular, the introduction of novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) has changed the therapeutic landscape in nmCRPC. Given recent developments in this field, we update our recommendations for the management of nmCRPC. METHODS A panel of 51 invited medical oncologists and urologists convened in May of 2021 with the aim of discussing and providing recommendations regarding the most relevant issues concerning staging methods, antineoplastic therapy, osteoclast-targeted therapy, and patient follow-up in nmCRPC. Panel members considered the available evidence and their practical experience to address the 73 multiple-choice questions presented. RESULTS Key recommendations and findings include the reliance on prostate-specific antigen doubling time for treatment decisions, the absence of a clear preference between conventional and novel (i.e., positron-emission tomography-based) imaging techniques, the increasing role of ARSis in various settings, the general view that ARSis have similar efficacy. Panelists highlighted the slight preference for darolutamide, when safety is of greater concern, and a continued need to develop high-level evidence to guide the intensity of follow-up in this subset of prostate cancer. DISCUSSION Despite the limitations associated with a consensus panel, the topics addressed are relevant in current practice, and the recommendations can help practicing clinicians to provide state-of-the-art treatment to patients with nmCRPC in Brazil and other countries with similar healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis L Jardim
- Hospital Sírio Libanês, Sociedade Beneficente de Senhoras, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Alexandre Saad Fere Lima Pompeo
- Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Departamento de Uro-Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Grupo de Uro-Oncologia do Hcor, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Alvaro Sadek Sarkis
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Andrey Soares
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Grupo Oncoclínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Genitourinary Group
| | | | - Arie Carneiro
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Camilla Fogassa
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Daher Cezar Chade
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Daniel Herchenhorn
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Genitourinary Group; Rede D'Or, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | - Fabio Roberto Kater
- Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Fernando De Moura
- Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Fernando Korkes
- Grupo de uro-oncologia da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Departamento de Urologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Fernando Meyer
- Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, Curitiba, PR, Brasil; Hospital Universitário Cajuru, Curitiba, PR, Brasil; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, PR, Brasil
| | - Fernando Nunes Galvao De Oliveira
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Genitourinary Group; Clínica de Oncologia do Grupo CAM (CLION), Salvador, BA, Brasil
| | - Fernando Sabino
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Genitourinary Group; Hospital Santa Lúcia, Brasília, DF, Brasil; Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | - Gustavo Franco Carvalhal
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil; Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | - Hanna Kim
- Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Igor Protzner Morbeck
- Hospital Sírio Libanês, Sociedade Beneficente de Senhoras, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil
| | - Joao Carlos Campagnari
- Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Clínica de Urologia e Nefrologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | - Karine Martins Da Trindade
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Genitourinary Group; Rede D'Or, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil
| | | | - Leonardo Borges
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Departamento de Urologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Lucas Mendes Nogueira
- Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | | | - Manuel Caitano Maia
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Genitourinary Group; Hospital Porto Dias, Department of Medical Oncology, Belém, Pará, Brasil
| | | | | | - Murilo De Almeida Luz
- Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Curitiba, PR, Brasil
| | - Oren Smaletz
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | - Roni De Carvalho Fernandes
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo - Hospital Central, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Sandro Roberto Cavallero
- Centro de Tratamento Oncológico (CTO), Belém, PA, Brasil; Hospital Adventista de Belém (HAB), Belém, PA, Brasil
| | - Vinicius Carrera Souza
- Instituto D'Or de Ensino e Pesquisa, Salvador, BA, Brasil; Rede D'Or, Salvador, BA, Brasil
| | - Wilson Busato
- Universidade do Vale do Itajai (UNIVALI), Itajai, SC, Brasil
| | - Wladimir Alfer
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Departamento de Urologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Departamento de Oncologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Departamento de Urologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang CK, Cha TL, Chang YH, Huang SP, Lin JT, Wang SS, Huang CY, Pang ST. Darolutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Efficacy, safety, and clinical perspectives of use. J Formos Med Assoc 2023; 122:299-308. [PMID: 36797129 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Darolutamide, a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor (SGARI), has been shown to increase metastasis-free survival and overall survival among men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Its unique chemical structure potentially provides efficacy and safety advantages over the SGARIs apalutamide and enzalutamide, which are also indicated for nmCRPC. Despite a lack of direct comparisons, the SGARIs appear to have similar efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) results. Indirect evidence suggests that darolutamide is preferred for its good adverse event profile, an attribute valued by physicians, patients, and their caregivers for maintaining QoL. Darolutamide and others in its class are costly; access may be a challenge for many patients and may lead to modifications to guideline-recommended regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Kuang Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Lung Cha
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Hwa Chang
- Division of General Urology, Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan; Department of Urology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Pin Huang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taiwan; Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan; College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
| | - See-Tong Pang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taiwan; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shore ND, Stenzl A, Pieczonka C, Klaassen Z, Aronson WJ, Karsh L, Ryan CJ, Ortiz J, Srinivasan S, Mohamed AF, Verholen F. Impact of darolutamide on local symptoms: pre-planned and post hoc analyses of the ARAMIS trial. BJU Int 2023; 131:452-460. [PMID: 36087070 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess, the effect of darolutamide (a structurally distinct androgen receptor inhibitor) on urinary and bowel symptoms, using data from the phase III ARAMIS trial (NCT02200614) that showed darolutamide significantly reduced the risk of metastasis and death versus placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) were randomised 2:1 to darolutamide (n = 955) or placebo (n = 554). Local symptom control was assessed by first prostate cancer-related invasive procedures and post hoc analyses of time to deterioration in quality of life (QoL) using total urinary and bowel symptoms, and individual questions for these symptoms from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Prostate Cancer Module subscales and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate prostate cancer subscale. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses were correlated with urinary and bowel adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Fewer patients receiving darolutamide (4.7%) versus placebo (9.6%) underwent invasive procedures, and time to first procedure was prolonged with darolutamide (hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.62). Darolutamide significantly (P < 0.01) delayed worsening of QoL for total urinary and bowel symptoms versus placebo, mostly attributed by individual symptoms of urinary frequency, associated pain, and interference with daily activities. AEs of urinary retention and dysuria were less frequent with darolutamide, and greater PSA response (≥90%, ≥50% and <90%, <50%) among darolutamide-treated patients was associated with lower incidences of urinary retention (2.2%, 4.2%, 5.1%) and dysuria (0.5%, 3.2%, 5.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Darolutamide demonstrated a positive impact on local disease recurrence and symptom control in patients with nmCRPC, delayed time to deterioration in QoL related to urinary and bowel symptoms, and a favourable safety profile showing similar incidence of urinary- and bowel-related AEs compared with placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Atlantic Urology Clinics, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | | | | | | | - William J Aronson
- University of California and VA Medical Center Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bögemann M, Shore ND, Smith MR, Tammela TLJ, Ulys A, Vjaters E, Polyakov S, Jievaltas M, Luz M, Alekseev B, Lebret T, Schostak M, Verholen F, Le Berre MA, Srinivasan S, Ortiz J, Mohamed AF, Sarapohja T, Fizazi K. Efficacy and Safety of Darolutamide in Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Stratified by Prostate-specific Antigen Doubling Time: Planned Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 ARAMIS Trial. Eur Urol 2023; 83:212-221. [PMID: 36089529 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) have a high risk of progression to metastatic disease, particularly if their prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) is ≤6 mo. However, patients remain at a high risk with a PSADT of >6 mo. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of darolutamide versus placebo in patients stratified by PSADT >6 or ≤6 mo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A planned subgroup analysis of a global multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase 3 trial in men with nmCRPC and PSADT ≤10 mo was conducted. INTERVENTION Patients were randomized 2:1 to oral darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or placebo, while continuing androgen-deprivation therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival (MFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and times to pain progression, first cytotoxic chemotherapy, and symptomatic skeletal events. Quality of life (QoL) was measured using validated prostate-relevant tools. Safety was recorded throughout the study. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 1509 patients enrolled, 469 had PSADT >6 mo (darolutamide n = 286; placebo n = 183) and 1040 had PSADT ≤6 mo (darolutamide n = 669; placebo n = 371). Baseline characteristics were balanced between subgroups. Darolutamide significantly prolonged MFS versus placebo in both subgroups (unstratified hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: PSADT >6 mo, 0.38 [0.26-0.55]; PSADT ≤6 mo, 0.41 [0.33-0.52]). OS and other efficacy and QoL endpoints favored darolutamide with significant improvement over placebo in both subgroups. The incidence of adverse events, including events commonly associated with androgen receptor inhibitors (fractures, falls, hypertension, and mental impairment), and discontinuations due to adverse events were low and similar to placebo. Limitations include small subgroup populations. CONCLUSIONS In patients with nmCRPC and PSADT >6 mo (maximum 10 mo), darolutamide provided a favorable benefit/risk ratio, characterized by significant improvements in MFS, OS, and other clinically relevant endpoints; maintenance of QoL; and favorable tolerability. PATIENT SUMMARY In patients with prostate cancer that has stopped responding to standard hormonal therapy (indicated by an increase in prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels), there is a risk that the cancer will spread to other parts of the body. This risk is highest when the time it takes for the PSA level to double (ie, "PSA doubling time" [PSADT]) is less than 6 mo. However, there is still a risk that the cancer will spread even if the PSADT is longer than 6 mo. In a group of patients whose PSADT was more than 6 mo but no more than 10 mo, treatment with darolutamide slowed the cancer spread and allowed them to live longer than patients who received placebo (inactive drug). Darolutamide treatment did not cause many side effects and helped maintain patients' quality of life without disruptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Bögemann
- Department of Urology, Münster University Medical Center, Münster, Germany.
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Atlantic Urology Clinics, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Matthew R Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Teuvo L J Tammela
- Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Albertas Ulys
- Institute of Oncology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Egils Vjaters
- Department of Urology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Sergey Polyakov
- Department of Urology, N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Mindaugas Jievaltas
- Department of Urology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Murilo Luz
- Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Boris Alekseev
- Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shore N, Garcia-Horton V, Terasawa E, Ayyagari R, Grossman JP, Waldeck AR. Safety differences across androgen receptor inhibitors in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Future Oncol 2023; 19:385-395. [PMID: 36794575 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Approval of apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide has transformed the treatment landscape and guideline recommendations for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer but now raises the issue of decision-making regarding treatment selection. In this commentary, we discuss the efficacy and safety of these second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors and propose that for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, safety considerations for these treatments are especially important. We examine these considerations in the context of patient and caregiver preferences as well as patient clinical characteristics. We further posit that consideration of treatments' safety profiles should include not only the initial direct impacts from potential treatment-emergent adverse events and drug-drug interaction events, but also the full cascade of potentially avoidable healthcare complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center/GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC 29572, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Berruti A, Bracarda S, Caffo O, Cortesi E, D'Angelillo R, Del Re M, Facchini G, Pappagallo G, Procopio G, Sabbatini R, Santini D. nmCRPC, a look in the continuous care of prostate cancer patients: state of art and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 115:102525. [PMID: 36822009 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is a clinical setting defined as confirmed rising levels of PSA in patients treated with ADT but without detectable metastases on conventional imaging with computerized tomography (CT) and technetium-99 m scintigraphy. Men with nmCRPC and a PSA doubling time (PSADT) ≤ 10 months are considered at high risk of rapidly developing metastases with a consequent possible impact on survival. Three recent phase III trials have demonstrated, in this setting, the efficacy of adding a next-generation androgen receptor targeted agent (ARTA) to ADT in respect to ADT only, in delaying the development of metastases (metastasis-free survival, MFS) and prolong overall survival. The magnitude of clinical benefit of these agents was even more meaningful if considering the low incidence of drug related adverse events. Our review described the latest advances in the management of nmCRPC, deriving from the pivotal clinical trials, SPARTAN, PROSPER and ARAMIS, in order to support clinicians to optimally manage these patients. Of note, the emergence of novel, more accurate, next-generation imaging techniques (including Ga PSMA-PET/CT), as well as eventual future tumor biomarkers, is modifying the entity and definition of the nmCRPC setting, with a consequent impact on patient's diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Berruti
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Italy.
| | - Sergio Bracarda
- Medical and Translational Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy.
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Medical Oncology Department, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Marzia Del Re
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Gaetano Facchini
- Oncology Complex Unit, "S. Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, ASL NA2 NORD, Pozzuoli, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Pappagallo
- School of Methodology of Clinical Research, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, VR, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Medical Oncology Unit, Programma Prostata, Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano.
| | - Roberto Sabbatini
- SC Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy.
| | - Daniele Santini
- UOC oncologia medica territoriale, La Sapienza Università, Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gillessen S, Procopio G, Hayoz S, Kremer E, Schwitter M, Caffo O, Lorente D, Pedrazzini A, Roubaud G, Nenan S, Omlin A, Buttigliero C, Delgado Mingorance JI, González-Del-Alba A, Delgado MT, Nole F, Turco F, Pereira Mestre R, Ribi K, Cathomas R. Darolutamide Maintenance in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Nonprogressive Disease After Taxane Treatment (SAKK 08/16). J Clin Oncol 2023:JCO2201726. [PMID: 36753698 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and safety of darolutamide maintenance after successful taxane chemotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) 08/16 is a randomized phase II study. Patients with mCRPC who received prior androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and subsequently had nonprogressive disease on a taxane were randomly assigned to darolutamide 600 mg twice a day or placebo twice a day. The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) at 12 weeks. Secondary end points were rPFS, event-free survival, overall survival (OS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 50% response rate, and adverse events. RESULTS Overall, 92 patients were recruited by 26 centers. Prior taxane was docetaxel in 93% and cabazitaxel in 7%. Prior ARPI was abiraterone in 60%, enzalutamide in 31%, and both in 9%. rPFS at 12 weeks was significantly improved with darolutamide (64.7% v 52.2%; P = .127). Median rPFS on darolutamide was 5.5 versus 4.5 months on placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.91; P = .017), and median event-free survival was 5.4 versus 2.9 months (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.73; P = .001). PSA 50% response rate was improved (22% v 4%; P = .014). Median OS for darolutamide was 24 versus 21.3 months for placebo (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.26; P = .181). Treatment-related adverse events were similar in both arms. CONCLUSION SAKK 08/16 met its primary end point, showing that switch maintenance with darolutamide after prior taxane chemotherapy and at least one ARPI resulted in a statistically significant but clinically modest rPFS prolongation with good tolerability. The median OS with darolutamide maintenance appears promising. Should these findings be confirmed in a larger trial, maintenance treatment could be a novel strategy in managing patients with mCRPC, especially those who responded well to prior ARPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- EOC-Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland.,Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, USI, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Michael Schwitter
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy
| | - David Lorente
- Consorci Hospitalari Provincial de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | | | | | - Soazig Nenan
- Unicancer, Département de la recherche et développement, Groupe d'étude des tumeurs urogénitales (GETUG), Paris, France
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland.,Onkozentrum Zürich Seefeld, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Consuelo Buttigliero
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, S. Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Torino), Italy
| | | | | | | | - Franco Nole
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), Milano, Italy
| | - Fabio Turco
- EOC-Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland.,Department of Oncology, University of Torino, S. Luigi Hospital, Orbassano (Torino), Italy
| | | | - Karin Ribi
- Competence Center of SAKK, Bern, Switzerland.,IBCSG Coordinating Office, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shore ND, Morgans AK, El-Haddad G, Srinivas S, Abramowitz M. Addressing Challenges and Controversies in the Management of Prostate Cancer with Multidisciplinary Teams. Target Oncol 2022; 17:709-725. [PMID: 36399218 PMCID: PMC9672595 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-022-00925-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The diagnostic and treatment landscapes of prostate cancer are rapidly evolving. This has led to several challenges and controversies regarding optimal management of the disease that outpace guidelines and clinical data. Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) can be used to engage the array of specialists that collaborate to treat complex malignancies such as prostate cancer. While the rationale for the use of MDTs in prostate cancer is well known, ways to optimally use MDTs to address the challenges and controversies associated with prostate cancer management are less well understood. One area of MDT care that remains undefined is how MDTs can most effectively provide guidance on clinical decision-making in situations in which information from novel diagnostic testing (genetic testing, molecular imaging) is substantially different from the established clinical risk factors. In this review, we provide a clinical perspective on ways that MDTs can be used to address this and other challenges and controversies across the prostate cancer disease continuum, from diagnosis to end-of-life considerations. Beyond clinical scenarios, we also review ways in which MDTs can mitigate disparities of care in prostate cancer. Overall, MDTs play a central role in helping to address the daily vexing issues faced by clinicians related to diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. Given the accelerating advances in precision medicine and targeted therapy, and the new questions and controversies these will bring, the value of MDTs for prostate cancer management will only increase in the future.
Collapse
|
14
|
French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: prostate cancer - Management of metastatic disease and castration resistance. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1373-1419. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
15
|
The Overall Survival and Safety of Men with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Combination Therapy of Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonists and Androgen-Deprivation Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1155/2022/6211059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background. Several novel androgen receptor antagonists have been introduced into the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the survival and safety of the combination therapy of novel androgen receptor antagonist and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with mHSPC. Methods. Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADT combined with novel androgen receptor antagonists compared with ADT alone in men with mHSPC. Revman 5.4 and STATA 14.0 were used to performed the meta-analysis, and hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the measurement indicators of outcome variables. Results. Six RCTs were eventually identified for meta-analysis. Compared with ADT alone, the combination therapy of novel androgen receptor antagonists and ADT can significantly improve the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as the pooled HR were 0.66, 95%CI (0.60, 0.72),
and 0.43, 95%CI (0.34, 0.54),
, respectively, despite increasing the risk of any serious adverse events (OR: 1.18, 95%CI (1.04, 1.33),
). Discussion. This study showed that compared with ADT alone, the combination therapy of novel androgen receptor antagonists and ADT can significantly improve the survival status of mHSPC patients, while it increases the risk of serious adverse events.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kanesvaran R, Castro E, Wong A, Fizazi K, Chua MLK, Zhu Y, Malhotra H, Miura Y, Lee JL, Chong FLT, Pu YS, Yen CC, Saad M, Lee HJ, Kitamura H, Prabhash K, Zou Q, Curigliano G, Poon E, Choo SP, Peters S, Lim E, Yoshino T, Pentheroudakis G. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with prostate cancer. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100518. [PMID: 35797737 PMCID: PMC9434138 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer was published in 2020. It was therefore decided, by both the ESMO and the Singapore Society of Oncology (SSO), to convene a special, virtual guidelines meeting in November 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2020 guidelines to take into account the differences associated with the treatment of prostate cancer in Asia. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug access restrictions in the different Asian countries. The latter were discussed when appropriate. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with prostate cancer across the different regions of Asia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Kanesvaran
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - E Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga, Malaga, Spain
| | - A Wong
- Division of Medical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - K Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - M L K Chua
- Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Y Zhu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - H Malhotra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sri Ram Cancer Center, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College Hospital, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences & Technology, Jaipur, India
| | - Y Miura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J L Lee
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - F L T Chong
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sabah Women and Children's Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
| | - Y-S Pu
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - C-C Yen
- Division of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Medical Oncology, Center for Immuno-oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - M Saad
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - H J Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - H Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - K Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Q Zou
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS and University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - E Poon
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - S P Choo
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Medical Oncology, Curie Oncology, Singapore, Singapore
| | - S Peters
- Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - E Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tartarone A, Lerose R, Tartarone M. Decisions and dilemmas in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer management. Med Oncol 2022; 39:107. [PMID: 35553247 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01743-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) indicates a condition characterized by the progression of the prostate-specific antigen without radiographic evidence of distant metastasis on conventional imaging during androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Recently, 3 phase III trials have shown that the addition of next-generation androgen-receptor inhibitors (ARIs) apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide to ADT allows patients with high-risk nmCRPC to delay the appearance of metastasis and to obtain long-term clinical benefits. However, the lack of head-to head comparison makes it difficult to choose one among these agents. We reviewed the literature and explained the rationale of the possible therapeutic choices. In any case, the availability of novel ARIs means that patients with nmCRPC have now a new effective treatment option that provides them a renewed hope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Tartarone
- Department of Onco-Hematology, Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-CROB Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, via Padre Pio 1, 85028, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
| | - Rosa Lerose
- Hospital Pharmacy, IRCCS-CROB Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yamashita H, Ogita M, Sawayanagi S, Nozawa Y, Abe O. Quality of life after definitive linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a longitudinal study. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:90. [PMID: 35545795 PMCID: PMC9097176 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02061-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy worldwide, and the majority of patients are diagnosed with localized disease. We examined patients' quality of life after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS We included patients who were treated between 2016 and 2020. Inclusion criteria were adenocarcinoma of the prostate; class risk of low, intermediate, and high; and a World Health Organization performance status of 0-2. Quality of life was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P). RESULTS A total of 439 patients were treated with SBRT, with a median age of 73 years old. The median follow-up period was 34 months. FACT-P Trial Outcome Index (p < 0.0001), FACT-General (p = 0.0003), and FACT-P-Total (p < 0.0001) scores declined at 1 month post-SBRT, then recovered and returned to the same level as before treatment at 3-4 months post-SBRT. The decrease in quality of life in the first month was particularly remarkable in patients who received long-term hormone injections (36%). One month after the end of SBRT, about 22% of patients experienced "quite a bit" or more troubling side effects. CONCLUSIONS This study showed longitudinal changes in quality of life by FACT-P after SBRT for prostate cancer. Overall, prostate SBRT was well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideomi Yamashita
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Mami Ogita
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Subaru Sawayanagi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yuki Nozawa
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Osamu Abe
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cattrini C, Caffo O, De Giorgi U, Mennitto A, Gennari A, Olmos D, Castro E. Apalutamide, Darolutamide and Enzalutamide for Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (nmCRPC): A Critical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1792. [PMID: 35406564 PMCID: PMC8997634 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) represents a condition in which patients with prostate cancer show biochemical progression during treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) without signs of radiographic progression according to conventional imaging. The SPARTAN, ARAMIS and PROSPER trials showed that apalutamide, darolutamide and enzalutamide, respectively, prolong metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) of nmCRPC patients with a short PSA doubling time, and these antiandrogens have been recently introduced in clinical practice as a new standard of care. No direct comparison of these three agents has been conducted to support treatment choice. In addition, a significant proportion of nmCRPC on conventional imaging is classified as metastatic with new imaging modalities such as the prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). Some experts posit that these "new metastatic" patients should be treated as mCRPC, resizing the impact of nmCRPC trials, whereas other authors suggest that they should be treated as nmCRPC patients, based on the design of pivotal trials. This review discusses the most convincing evidence regarding the use of novel antiandrogens in patients with nmCRPC and the implications of novel imaging techniques for treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Cattrini
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Maggiore della Carità” University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy; (C.C.); (A.M.); (A.G.)
- Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy;
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Alessia Mennitto
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Maggiore della Carità” University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy; (C.C.); (A.M.); (A.G.)
- Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Maggiore della Carità” University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy; (C.C.); (A.M.); (A.G.)
- Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - David Olmos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Elena Castro
- Genitourinary Cancer Translational Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain
- UGCI Medical Oncology, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen de la Victoria y Regional de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Assessment and Management of Cognitive Function in Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Second-Generation Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors. CNS Drugs 2022; 36:419-449. [PMID: 35522374 PMCID: PMC9073450 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00913-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Preservation of cognitive function is an important outcome in oncology. Optimal patient management requires an understanding of cognitive effects of the disease and its treatment and an efficacious approach to assessment and management of cognitive dysfunction, including selection of treatments to minimize the risk of cognitive impairment. Awareness is increasing of the potentially detrimental effects of cancer-related cognitive dysfunction on functional independence and quality of life. Prostate cancer occurs most often in older men, who are more likely to develop cognitive dysfunction than younger individuals; this population may be particularly vulnerable to treatment-related cognitive disorders. Prompt identification of treatment-induced cognitive dysfunction is a crucial aspect of effective cancer management. We review the potential etiologies of cognitive decline in patients with prostate cancer, including the potential role of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors; commonly used tools for assessing cognitive function validated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and adopted in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer trials; and strategies for management of cognitive symptoms. Many methods are currently used to assess cognitive function. The prevalence and severity of cognitive dysfunction vary according to the instruments and criteria applied. Consensus on the definition of cognitive dysfunction and on the most appropriate approaches to quantify its extent and progression in patients treated for prostate cancer is lacking. Evidence-based guidance on the appropriate tools and time to assess cognitive function in patients with prostate cancer is required.
Collapse
|
21
|
Kretschmer A, van den Bergh RCN, Martini A, Marra G, Valerio M, Tsaur I, Heidegger I, Kasivisvanathan V, Kesch C, Preisser F, Fankhauser CD, Zattoni F, Ceci F, Olivier J, Chiu P, Puche-Sanz I, Thibault C, Gandaglia G, Tilki D. Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer-Current State and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010147. [PMID: 35008310 PMCID: PMC8749907 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In recent years, evidence regarding survival outcomes of novel therapies has increased significantly. However, less is known regarding the impact of novel therapy combinations on quality of life aspects of the treated patients. In the current comprehensive review, we discuss the importance of quality of life for patients with advanced prostate cancer, and present the most frequently used tools to evaluate quality of life in recent randomized trials. Further, we discuss the ease of use of these validated questionnaires for clinicians and try to focus on the suggested appropriate use as well as potential strategies for improvement of quality of life evaluation in these clinical scenarios of advanced prostate cancer. Abstract With the therapeutic landscape of advanced prostate cancer rapidly evolving and oncological benefits being shown for a plethora of new agents and indications, health-related quality of life (HRQOL)-associated evidence is still subpar. In the current comprehensive review, we discuss the importance of HRQOL for patients with advanced PC (metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)), and present the most frequently used tools to evaluate HRQOL in recent randomized trials. Furthermore, we discuss the ease of use of these validated questionnaires for clinicians and try to focus on the suggested appropriate use in clinical practice, as well as potential strategies for improvement of HRQOL evaluation in these clinical scenarios of advanced prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kretschmer
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89440076531
| | | | - Alberto Martini
- Unit of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.); (G.G.)
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy;
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, CHUV Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Mainz University Medicine, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London W1W 7TY, UK;
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | | | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy;
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Jonathan Olivier
- Department of Urology, Lille University Hospital, 59000 Lille, France;
| | - Peter Chiu
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China;
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Bio-Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada, 18014 Granada, Spain;
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75004 Paris, France;
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.); (G.G.)
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, 34010 Istanbul, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
López-Campos F, Conde-Moreno A, Barrado Los Arcos M, Gómez-Caamaño A, García-Gómez R, Hervás Morón A. Treatment Landscape of Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Window of Opportunity. J Pers Med 2021; 11:1190. [PMID: 34834544 PMCID: PMC8619952 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is a highly unmet medical need. The classic treatment approach for these patients-androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone-until metastatic progression is now considered suboptimal. Several randomized phase III clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefits-including significantly better overall survival (OS)-for treatments that combine ADT with apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide. As a result, these approaches are now included in treatment guidelines and are considered a standard of care. In the present article, we discuss the changing landscape of the management of patients with nmCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando López-Campos
- Deparment Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Conde-Moreno
- Deparment Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46010 Valencia, Spain;
| | | | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- Deparment Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - Raquel García-Gómez
- Deparment Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Asunción Hervás Morón
- Deparment Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|