Immune checkpoint blockers in solid organ transplant recipients and cancer: the INNOVATED cohort

BACKGROUND

Patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) and solid tumors are usually excluded from clinical trials testing immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). As transplant rates are increasing, we aimed to evaluate ICB outcomes in this population, with a special focus on lung cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study collecting real data of ICB use in patients with SOT and solid tumors. Clinical data and treatment outcomes were assessed by using retrospective medical chart reviews in every participating center. Study endpoints were: overall response rate (ORR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events.

RESULTS

From August 2016 to October 2022, 31 patients with SOT (98% kidney) and solid tumors were identified (36.0% lung cancer, 19.4% melanoma, 13.0% genitourinary cancer, 6.5% gastrointestinal cancer). Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was positive in 29% of tumors. Median age was 61 years, 69% were males, and 71% received ICB as first-line treatment. In the whole cohort the ORR was 45.2%, with a 6-month PFS of 56.8%. In the lung cancer cohort, the ORR was 45.5%, with a 6-month PFS of 32.7%, and median overall survival of 4.6 months. The grade 3 immune-related adverse events rate leading to ICB discontinuation was 12.9%. Allograft rejection rate was 25.8%, and risk of rejection was similar regardless of the type of ICB strategy (monotherapy or combination, 28% versus 33%, P = 1.0) or response to ICB treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

ICB could be considered a feasible option for SOT recipients with some advanced solid malignancies and no alternative therapeutic options. Due to the risk of allograft rejection, multidisciplinary teams should be involved before ICB therapy.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in elderly patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Analysis of the NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 study

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are standard of care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma but their activity and safety in elderly patients is insufficiently explored. We evaluated outcomes of elderly patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN phase 2 trial (NCT03013335) and conducted exploratory circulating biomarker analyses.

METHODS

Patients with mRCC were treated with nivolumab after at least one antiangiogenic therapy. The main endpoint of this analysis was safety in patients ≥ 70 years old (y.o), as per the rate of treatment-related grade 3-5 events (TRAE). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival. Exploration of candidate biomarkers associated with aging included baseline circulating cytokines involved in inflammation, adhesion, immune checkpoints, angiogenesis (IL6, IL7, IL8, BAFF, CXCL13, VCAM-1, 4-1BB, VEGF).

RESULTS

Of 720 patients, 515 were < 70 y.o and 205 ≥ 70 y.o. Patients ≥ 70 y.o exhibited numerically less IMDC poor risk disease (21.0% vs 26.9%), sarcomatoid component (4.9% vs 9.8%) or brain metastases (5.9% vs. 14.7%), but more previous treatment lines (≥ 2 in 54.1% vs 48.5%). TRAE were higher in patients ≥ 70 y.o (24.9% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.033). Respective ORR (19.2% vs. 22.1%) and median PFS (4.5 versus 3.0 months, HR 0.97 [95%CI 0.81-1.15]) were similar. Overall survival was shorter in patients ≥ 70 y.o (19.3 versus 26.9 months, HR 1.26 [95%CI 1.04-1.51]), but not significantly in a competitive risk model. Only V-CAM1 and 4-1BB were found to be increased in patients ≥ 70 y.o.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab displayed higher grade 3/4 TRAE but manageable toxicity in elderly patients, with sustained activity. Elderly patients did not display specific inflammatory or angiogenic circulating profiles.

Management of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with clinical evidence of pelvic lymph node metastases

Identification of clinically positive pelvic lymph node metastases (cN+) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is currently challenging, as the diagnostic accuracy of available imaging modalities is limited. Conventional CT is still considered the gold-standard approach to diagnose lymph node metastases in these patients. The development of innovative diagnostic methods including radiomics, artificial intelligence-based models and molecular biomarkers might offer new perspectives for the diagnosis of cN+ disease. With regard to the treatment of these patients, multimodal strategies are likely to provide the best oncological outcomes, especially using induction chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in responders to chemotherapy. Additionally, the use of adjuvant nivolumab has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence in patients who still harbour ypT2-T4a and/or ypN+ disease after surgery. Alternatively, the use of avelumab maintenance therapy can be offered to patients with unresectable cN+ tumours who have at least stable disease after induction chemotherapy alone. Lastly, patients with cN+ tumours who are not responding to induction chemotherapy are potential candidates for receiving second-line treatment with pembrolizumab.

Avelumab first-line maintenance treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: review of evidence to guide clinical practice

The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase III trial led to the incorporation of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance treatment into international guidelines as a standard of care for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) without progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. JAVELIN Bladder 100 showed that avelumab 1L maintenance significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival in this population compared with a 'watch-and-wait' approach. The aim of this manuscript is to review clinical studies of avelumab 1L maintenance in patients with advanced UC, including long-term efficacy and safety data from JAVELIN Bladder 100, subgroup analyses in clinically relevant subpopulations, and 'real-world' data obtained outside of clinical trials, providing a comprehensive resource to support patient management. Extended follow-up from JAVELIN Bladder 100 has shown that avelumab provides a long-term efficacy benefit, with a median OS of 23.8 months measured from start of maintenance treatment, and 29.7 months measured from start of 1L chemotherapy. Longer OS was observed across subgroups, including patients who received 1L cisplatin + gemcitabine, patients who received four or six cycles of 1L chemotherapy, and patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease as best response to 1L induction chemotherapy. No new safety signals were seen in patients who received ≥1 year of avelumab treatment, and toxicity was similar in those who had received cisplatin or carboplatin with gemcitabine. Other clinical datasets, including noninterventional studies conducted in Europe, USA, and Asia, have confirmed the efficacy of avelumab 1L maintenance. Potential subsequent treatment options after avelumab maintenance include antibody-drug conjugates (enfortumab vedotin or sacituzumab govitecan), erdafitinib in biomarker-selected patients, platinum rechallenge in suitable patients, nonplatinum chemotherapy, and clinical trial participation; however, evidence to determine optimal treatment sequences is needed. Ongoing trials of avelumab-based combination regimens as maintenance treatment have the potential to evolve the treatment landscape for patients with advanced UC.

Design and rationale of a single-arm phase II study of neoadjuvant Durvalumab and Gemcitabine associated with Cisplatin or Carboplatin for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: the iNDUCT trial (NCT04617756)

BACKGROUND

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is often locally advanced at initial diagnosis and is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy has shown a recurrence-free survival benefit in a randomised phase III trial, while neoadjuvant treatment seems promising in retrospective series. On the contrary, little is known about the role of perioperative immunotherapy and its combination with chemotherapy for UTUC patients, although initial positive results have been published for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

STUDY DESIGN AND ENDPOINTS

Against this backdrop, we are running a multi-centre single-arm phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant Durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, combined with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin or Carboplatin for high-risk UTUC patients. The primary outcome is pathological complete response rate at RNU. Secondary endpoints include the partial pathological response rate, safety, as well as disease-free and overall survival. A biomarker analysis is also planned.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Included patients must have a good performance status and harbour a non-metastatic UTUC, considered at high risk of progression, defined as either biopsy-proven high-grade disease or invasive features at imaging with or, more recently, without high-grade cytology at the multidisciplinary team discretion, as specified in the latest amendment. Enrolled patients receive 3 cycles of neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy before RNU, and the standard of care thereafter. The trial is registered as NCT04617756 and is supervised by an independent data monitoring committee.

[Antibody drug conjugates (ADC) and bispecific antibodies in oncology - report of the 2022 Saint Louis day]

Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADC) and bispecific antibodies are booming and were the subject of the scientific event proposed by the French Society of Oncological Pharmacy, October 13, 2022. An ADC is composed of the antibody targeting a receptor expressed on the tumor cell, the spacer making it possible to attach the cytotoxic to the antibody and to control its distribution in the body, and the cytotoxic. Therapeutic antibodies, monoclonal and conjugated, have particular pharmacokinetics. Unlike monoclonal antibodies for which the standard dose is most often fixed, this is expressed in mg/m2 (or mg/kg) and capped at 2m2 (or 100kg) for conjugates. The linked cytotoxics are powerful cytotoxics: mitotic spindle poisons (emtansine, monomethyl auristatin E or vedotin), topoisomerase I inhibitors (deruxtecan, SN 38) or antibiotics (ozogamicin). In senology, trastuzumab deruxtecan (anti-HER2) and sacituzumab govitecan (anti-Trop 2) are now modifying treatment standards for patients with metastatic breast cancer, respectively HER2 3X or HER2 low and triple negative. In metastatic bladder cancer, enfortumab vedotin (anti-nectin 4) is positioned as the 2nd line of treatment. Bispecific antibodies, on the other hand, are able to target two epitopes, an antigen specific to a tumor cell and one to an immune cell, allowing a bridge between the killer immune cells and the tumor cells. For lymphoma proliferation, many bispecific antibodies are in development. The most advanced are glofitamab, epcoritamab and mosunetuzumab, which target the CD20 of B lymphocytes and the CD3 of T lymphocytes. Bispecific antibodies are also emerging in the treatment of myeloma with teclistamab and elranatamab (anti-CD3 and anti-BCMA) or talquetamab (anti-GPRC5D and anti-CD3). Conjugated antibodies, and more recently bispecific antibodies, are potential game changers in cancer treatment and researchs are needed to improve their efficacy and safety.

The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy

PURPOSE

To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU.

RESULTS

With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.

Efficacy and safety of cabozantinib rechallenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective multicentric study

BACKGROUND

Despite metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) expanded treatment options, disease progression ultimately occurs for most patients. Rechallenge may be a compelling strategy in a refractory setting. Cabozantinib is the standard of care in first and later lines of therapy, but its activity in rechallenge is unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib rechallenge, as defined by a second exposure after an interval of ≥3 months without treatment or ≥1 other treatment line, in patients with mRCC. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (PFS) at rechallenge. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, and safety at rechallenge.

RESULTS

We included 51 mRCC patients who received cabozantinib in a rechallenge setting between 2017 and 2022. Median age at diagnosis was 54 years, 78% were male, 90% had clear cell mRCC, and 92% had prior nephrectomy. 15 patients (29%) were rechallenged after a pause in treatment, whereas 36 (70.6%) had ≥1 other treatment lines between first cabozantinib exposure (CABO-1) and rechallenge (CABO-2). Median PFS was 15.1 months (mo, 95% Confidence interval 11.2-22.1) at CABO-1 and 14.4mo (95%CI 9.8-NR) at CABO-2. Median overall survival was 67.6mo for CABO-1 (95% CI 52.2-NR) and 27.4mo for CABO-2 (95%CI 17.2-NR); objective response rate was 70.6% for CABO-1 and 60% for CABO-2. CABO-2 PFS was higher for patients with CABO-1 PFS > 12 months, and for those who discontinued CABO-1 because of toxicity, without statistical significance. There were no unexpected adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Cabozantinib rechallenge is a feasible treatment option with potential clinical benefit for mRCC patients.

Cell cycle arrest and p53 prevent ON-target megabase-scale rearrangements induced by CRISPR-Cas9

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has revolutionized our ability to precisely modify the genome and has led to gene editing in clinical applications. Comprehensive analysis of gene editing products at the targeted cut-site has revealed a complex spectrum of outcomes. ON-target genotoxicity is underestimated with standard PCR-based methods and necessitates appropriate and more sensitive detection methods. Here, we present two complementary Fluorescence-Assisted Megabase-scale Rearrangements Detection (FAMReD) systems that enable the detection, quantification, and cell sorting of edited cells with megabase-scale loss of heterozygosity (LOH). These tools reveal rare complex chromosomal rearrangements caused by Cas9-nuclease and show that LOH frequency depends on cell division rate during editing and p53 status. Cell cycle arrest during editing suppresses the occurrence of LOH without compromising editing. These data are confirmed in human stem/progenitor cells, suggesting that clinical trials should consider p53 status and cell proliferation rate during editing to limit this risk by designing safer protocols.

Innovation in Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancers: Radiochemical Perspective and Recent Therapeutic Practices

Prostate cancer represents the second cause of death by cancer in males in western countries. While early-stage diseases are accessible to surgery and/or external radiotherapy, advanced metastatic prostate cancers are primarily treated with androgen deprivation therapy, to which new generation androgen receptor antagonists or taxane-based chemotherapies are added in the case of tumor relapse. Nevertheless, patients become invariably resistant to castration with a median survival that rarely exceeds 3 years. This fostered the search for alternative strategies, independent of the androgen receptor signaling pathway. In this line, radionuclide therapies may represent an interesting option as they could target either the microenvironment of sclerotic bone metastases with the use of radiopharmaceuticals containing samarium-153, strontium-89 or radium-223 or tumor cells expressing the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a protein found at the surface of prostate cancer cells. This review gives highlights the chemical properties of radioligands targeting prostate cancer cells and recapitulates the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of radionuclide therapies, alone or in combination with other approved treatments, in patients with castration-resistant prostate tumors. It discusses some of the encouraging results obtained, especially the benefit on overall survival that was reported with [¹⁷⁷Lu]-PSMA-617. It also addresses the specific requirements for the use of this particular class of drugs, both in terms of medical staff coordination and adapted infrastructures for efficient radioprotection.

Gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab for kidney metastatic collecting duct and medullary carcinomas: Results of a prospective phase II trial (BEVABEL-GETUG/AFU24)

BACKGROUND

Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) and collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) are rare entities with a poor outcome. First-line metastatic treatment is based on gemcitabine + platinum chemotherapy (GC) regimen but retrospective data suggest enhanced anti-tumour activity with the addition of bevacizumab. Therefore, we performed a prospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of GC + bevacizumab in metastatic RMC/CDC.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 2 open-label trial in 18 centres in France in patients with metastatic RMC/CDC and no prior systemic treatment. Patients received bevacizumab plus GC up to 6 cycles followed, for non-progressive disease, by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The co-primary end-points were objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (ORR-6; PFS-6). PFS, overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary end-points. At interim analysis, the trial was closed due to toxicity and lack of efficacy.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2019, 34 of the 41 planned patients have been enroled. After a median follow-up of 25 months, ORR-6 and PFS-6 were 29.4% and 47.1%, respectively. Median OS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6-24.2). Seven patients (20.6%) discontinued bevacizumab because of toxicities (hypertension, proteinuria, colonic perforation). Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 82% patients, the most common being haematologic toxicities and hypertension. Two patients experienced grade 5 toxicity (subdural haematoma related to bevacizumab and encephalopathy of unknown origin).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed no benefit for bevacizumab added to chemotherapy in metastatic RMC and CDC with higher than expected toxicity. Consequently, GC regimen remains a therapeutic option for RMC/CDC patients.

[Collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma in the age of new therapies]

Collecting duct carcinoma (also known as Bellini tumour) and renal medullary carcinoma are two extremely rare and aggressive renal cancers. They are both less responsive to conventional treatments used in clear cell renal carcinoma. There are very few studies evaluating their optimal management and currently, at the metastatic stage, polychemotherapy based on platinum salts remains the most widely used. The emergence of new treatments such as anti-angiogenic TKIs, immunotherapy or treatments targeting specific genetic abnormalities, opens up a new field of possibilities in the management of these cancers. The evaluation of the response to these treatments is therefore essential. In this article, we will review the status of their management and the various studies that have evaluated recent treatments in these two cancers.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: Results of the GETUG-AFU26-NIVOREN multicentre phase II study

INTRODUCTION

Bone metastases (BM) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with a poor prognosis based on retrospective studies evaluating antiangiogenic agents. Few data are available regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with bone metastatic RCC. NIVOREN is a multicentre prospective study in which patients were treated with nivolumab after the failure of antiangiogenic agents. We aim to assess the impact of BM on prognosis, and the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients enrolled in the NIVOREN trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with BM at inclusion were included in our study. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and skeletal-related events (SRE).

RESULTS

Among 720 patients treated with nivolumab, 194 presented BM at inclusion. The median follow-up was 23.9 months. Median OS was 17.9 months in patients with BM versus 26.1 months in patients without BM (p = 0.0023). The difference was not statistically significant after adjustment (p = 0.0707). The median PFS was shorter in patients with BM even after adjustment (2.8 versus 4.6 months, p = 0.0045), as well as the ORR (14.8% versus 23.3%). SRE occurred for 36% of patients with BM. A post-hoc analysis evaluating the impact of bone-targeting agents (BTA) on SRE incidence showed a significant benefit of BTA on the incidence of SRE (OR = 0.367, CI95% [0.151-0.895]).

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab is associated with shorter PFS, and lower ORR in RCC patients with BM. Our study suggests that BTA in association with immunotherapy decreases the incidence of SRE.

Natural history of patients with muscle metastases from renal cell carcinoma: Results of the French national ARTEMIS study

618

Background: Muscle metastases (MM) are among rare secondary locations in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Current guidelines do not provide specific advice on the management of these patients. There is a lack of scientific literature on the subject, mainly based on case reports or small retrospective monocentric cohorts. To date, therefore, there remains uncertainty about the clinical history, prognosis, and appropriate management of patients with MM. Methods: ARTEMIS is an ambispective national French multicenter, non-interventional study. It was opened to patients with metastatic RCC who had MM. The study was designed to assess overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), describe diagnostic and treatment modalities, and treatment-related serious adverse events in case of local treatments (TR-SAEs). Results: Median follow-up was 74.4 months IC95% [38.7-84.1]. The 146 enrolled patients were 73.6% male, with a median age of 57.6 years at diagnosis. They were initially diagnosed with stage IV RCC for 40.4% of them and had a favorable (36.2%), intermediate (45.7%), or poor (18.1%) IMDC risk score at the onset of metastases. Initially, metastases were mainly located in the lungs (55.5%), lymph nodes (26.7%), and bones (24.0%). Patients had a history of partial or total nephrectomy in 78.8% of cases. There were 30.0% of patients with synchronous MM. The median times from initial diagnosis or metastatic status to MM discovery were 25.5 [16.8-35.7] months and 8.4 [5.0-13.5] months, respectively. The majority (69.0%) of MM were discovered on conventional injected CT scans, whereas 8.3% were diagnosed clinically. Survival data are displayed on the table. Thirty-seven (25.3%) patients received local treatment of their MM which consisted of: external radiotherapy (48.6%), surgery (27.0%), cryotherapy (27.0%), stereotactic radiotherapy (5.4%), embolization (2.7%). Among them, local treatments prevented local relapse of MM in 28 patients (75.7%). Local TR-SAEs were seen in two patients (5.4%). Conclusions: ARTEMIS is the largest published cohort describing the disease history of patients with RCC suffering from MM. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the diagnostic and treatment modalities, also survival data. Despite its low incidence, the issue of these patients is not so rare in physicians’ practice. This work thus allows a greater understanding of clinical features and treatment of this pathology. [Table: see text]

Full analysis from AVENANCE: A real-world study of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance treatment in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC)

471

Background: In the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial, avelumab 1L maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) vs BSC alone in pts with aUC that had not progressed with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (CTx). The JAVELIN Bladder regimen is now standard of care with level 1 evidence in international treatment guidelines. The AVENANCE study (NCT04822350), is investigating the efficacy and safety of avelumab 1L maintenance in a real-world population of pts with aUC in France. Data from the full analysis set are reported for the first time. Methods: In this ongoing, noninterventional, ambispective study, eligible pts have locally advanced or metastatic UC that has not progressed with 1L platinum-based CTx and previous, ongoing, or planned avelumab 1L maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint is OS from start of avelumab; secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), duration of treatment (DOT), and safety. Results: 591 pts received avelumab. At data cutoff (July 31, 2022), median follow-up was 12.0 mo (95% CI, 10.9-12.9). Median age was 73.1 y (IQR, 67.0-78.1). At start of 1L CTx (excluding pts with missing data), disease stage was metastatic in 524 pts (90.5%; visceral metastases in 426 [81.5%]) and locally advanced in 54 (9.3%). ECOG PS was 0-1 in 407 pts (85.3%) and 2-3 in 69 (14.5%). Tumor histology was pure UC in 528 pts (91.8%) and UC with variant or pure variant in 47 (8.2%). 1L CTx was gemcitabine + carboplatin (GemCarbo), gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis), dose-dense methotrexate + vinblastine + adriamycin + cisplatin (DD-MVAC), and other in 353 (61.0%), 170 (29.4%), 28 (4.8%), and 28 (4.8%) pts, respectively. Median number of cycles was 5 (range, 1-10). Median DOT with avelumab was 5.8 mo (95% CI, 5.2-7.0); 241 pts (40.8%) remained on treatment at data cutoff. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (74.1% [n=258]), death (11.5% [n=40]), and adverse events ([AEs] 10.3% [n=36]). Median OS from start of avelumab was 18.4 mo (95% CI, 15.4-not estimable [NE]), the 12-month OS rate was 64.8% (95% CI, 60.0%-69.1%), and median PFS was 5.7 mo (95% CI, 5.3-7.0). In pts who had received GemCarbo, GemCis, or DD-MVAC, median OS (95% CI) was 16.2 mo (13.4-NE), not reached (NR; 18.1-NE), and NR (15.2-NE), respectively. Subgroups analyses will be presented. 218 pts received subsequent 2L, including CTx, antibody-drug conjugates, immunotherapy, and other in 186 (85.3%), 22 (10.1%), 6 (2.8%), and 4 (1.8%) pts, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 217 pts (36.7%), including serious TRAEs in 29 (4.9%). Conclusions: Real-world data for avelumab 1L maintenance in pts with aUC from AVENANCE support the findings of JAVELIN Bladder 100 and confirm the clinical activity and acceptable safety profile of avelumab in a heterogeneous population. Clinical trial information: NCT04822350 .

Study of cabozantinib in second line under real-life setting in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Study design of a French retrospective, multicenter study (OCTOPUS)

TPS744

Background: Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) directed against VEGFR, MET and AXL. In the pivotal phase III METEOR study, cabozantinib demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) versus everolimus in patients with previously treated aRCC with clear-cell component. Thus, cabozantinib received marketing authorization from the European Medicine Agency in September 2016 for the treatment of aRCC in patients previously treated with a VEGF-targeted therapy. Cabozantinib effectiveness and safety have been investigated in several real-world evidence studies such as CABOREAL or CASSIOPE. However, many questions arising during the routine care of patients with aRCC treated by cabozantinib remain unanswered by the current literature. Therefore, the aims of OCTOPUS study are to describe the effectiveness and safety of 2nd line cabozantinib in a real-life setting in France and to address these unanswered questions in certain patients subgroups. Methods: Octopus is a multicenter (25 centers), retrospective, non-comparative, non-interventional study in patients with aRCC initiating cabozantinib in 2nd line in France. The primary endpoint is the duration of treatment (DOT) with cabozantinib: median DOT will be estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Key secondary endpoints to be assessed are: best overall response (BOR), PFS, adverse events (AEs) and subsequent treatment. DOT, BOR, PFS, safety and all baseline characteristics for each of the following subgroups will be described as exploratory endpoints: sequencing post-cabozantinib, long-responders, non-responders, cabozantinib & rechallenge, cabozantinib & therapeutic schedules, cabozantinib & local treatment, cabozantinib & elderly patients. Data will be analyzed descriptively. Due to the observational nature of this study, no formal calculation of sample size and statistical power were performed. With a sample size of 300 participants who started cabozantinib in 2nd line between 1st March 2018 and 1st March 2021 and a median DOT of 7.6 months, the two-sided confidence interval of the median will be estimated with a width equal to 1.7 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI] [6.8; 8.6]) and a censoring probability near 0. All collected data will be in accordance with the daily practice of medical doctors, with a maximum follow-up of 12-months. Data collection started in Q3 2022 and the first patient was included on September 16th 2022. No interim analysis is planned. This study is funded by Ipsen Pharma. Clinical trial information: NCT05444933 .

Urachal carcinoma: a large retrospective multicentric study from the French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group

Introduction

Urachal cancer (UrC) is a rare, non-urothelial malignancy. Its natural history and management are poorly understood. Although localized to the bladder dome, the most common histological subtype of UrC is adenocarcinoma. UrC develops from an embryonic remnant, and is frequently diagnosed in advanced stage with poor prognosis. The treatment is not standardized, and based only on case reports and small series. This large retrospective multicentric study was conducted by the French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group to gain a better understanding of UrC.

Material and Methods

data has been collected retrospectively on 97 patients treated at 22 French Cancer Centers between 1996 and 2020.

Results

The median follow-up was 59 months (range 44-96). The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range 20-86), 45% were females and 23% had tobacco exposure. For patients with localized disease (Mayo I-II, n=46) and with lymph-node invasion (Mayo III, n=13) median progression-free-survival (mPFS) was 31 months (95% CI: 20-67) and 7 months (95% CI: 6-not reached (NR)), and median overall survival (mOS) was 73 months (95% CI: 57-NR) and 22 months (95% CI: 21-NR) respectively. For 45 patients with Mayo I-III had secondary metastatic progression, and 20 patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Metastatic localization was peritoneal for 54% of patients. Most patients with localized tumor were treated with partial cystectomy, with mPFS of 20 months (95% CI: 14-49), and only 12 patients received adjuvant therapy. Metastatic patients (Mayo IV) had a mOS of 23 months (95% CI: 19-33) and 69% received a platin-fluorouracil combination treatment.

Conclusion

UrC is a rare tumor of the bladder where patients are younger with a higher number of females, and a lower tobacco exposure than in standard urothelial carcinoma. For localized tumor, partial cystectomy is recommended. The mOS and mPFS were low, notably for patients with lymph node invasion. For metastatic patients the prognosis is poor and standard therapy is not well-defined. Further clinical and biological knowledge are needed.

Oncological Outcomes of Delayed Nephrectomy After Optimal Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In the current era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the role and optimal timing of a nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the oncological outcomes of patients who responded to ICI-based treatments and were subsequently treated with a delayed nephrectomy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This national retrospective evaluation included 30 patients with mRCC who underwent a nephrectomy after a complete response (CR) or a major partial response (>80%) to ICI treatment at metastatic sites.

INTERVENTION

Partial or radical nephrectomy after a favorable response to ICI treatment.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and potential discontinuation of systemic treatment were assessed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

ICI-based treatments included ipilimumab-nivolumab (40%), ICI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor (10%), and nivolumab (50%). A delayed nephrectomy was performed after a median ICI treatment duration of 10 mo. In 19 cases (63.3%), surgeons faced difficulties due to adhesions or inflammatory changes. A complete pathological response was observed in 16.7% of patients. After a median follow-up of 19.5 mo after nephrectomy, 76.7% of patients achieved DFS. At 1 yr, 66.7% of patients were free from systemic treatment. The PFS and OS rates were, respectively, 96.7% and 100% at 1 yr, and 78.3% and 86.1% at 2 yr. Patients with a CR at metastatic sites had a better prognosis than those with a major partial response, in terms of DFS (p = 0.022) and PFS (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite potentially challenging surgery, a delayed nephrectomy for patients who responded to ICI treatment provided promising oncological outcomes, and the majority of patients could discontinue systemic treatment.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this study, we evaluated the clinical outcome in patients who responded well to immunotherapy, and subsequently underwent kidney ablation surgery. Three-quarters of patients experienced no recurrence, and in most cases, medical treatment could be discontinued.

Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors in Addition to Docetaxel with Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined the role of adding androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), including abiraterone acetate (ABI), apalutamide, darolutamide (DAR), and enzalutamide (ENZ), to docetaxel (DOC) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the oncologic benefit of triplet combination therapies using ARSI + DOC + ADT, and comparing them with available treatment regimens in patients with mHSPC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Three databases and meetings abstracts were queried in April 2022 for RCTs analyzing patients treated with first-line combination systemic therapy for mHSPC. The primary interests of measure were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the differential outcomes in patients with low- and high-volume disease as well as de novo and metachronous metastasis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 11 RCTs were included for meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). We found that the triplet combinations outperformed DOC + ADT in terms of OS (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.84) and PFS (pooled HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.42-0.58). There was no statistically significant difference between patients with low- and high-volume disease in terms of an OS benefit from adding an ARSI to DOC +ADT (both HR: 0.79; p = 1). Based on NMAs, triplet therapy also outperformed ARSI + ADT in terms of OS (DAR + DOC + ADT: pooled HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99) and PFS (ABI + DOC + ADT: HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.91, and ENZ + DOC + ADT: HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.93). An analysis of treatment ranking among de novo mHSPC patients showed that triplet therapy had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with high-volume disease; however, doublet therapy using ARSI + ADT had the highest likelihood of improved OS in patients with low-volume disease.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the triplet combination therapy improves survival endpoints in mHSPC patients compared with currently available doublet treatment regimens. Our findings need to be confirmed in further head-to-head trials with longer follow-up and among various patient populations.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our study suggests that triplet therapy with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, docetaxel, androgen deprivation therapy prolongs survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer compared with the current standard doublet therapy.

Escherichia coli-specific CXCL13-producing TFH are associated with clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade against muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Biomarkers guiding the neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) are needed for patients with localized muscle invasive bladder cancers (MIBC). Profiling tumor and blood samples, we found that follicular helper CD4+ T cells (TFH) are among the best therapeutic targets of pembrolizumab correlating with progression-free survival. TFH were associated with tumoral CD8 and PD-L1 expression at baseline, and the induction of tertiary lymphoid structures post-pembrolizumab. Blood central memory TFH accumulated in tumors where they produce CXCL13, a chemokine found in the plasma of responders only. IgG4+CD38+ TFH residing in bladder tissues correlated with clinical benefit. Finally, TFH and IgG directed against urothelium invasive Escherichia coli dictated clinical responses to pembrolizumab in three independent cohorts. The links between tumor infection and success of ICB immunomodulation should be prospectively assessed at a larger scale.

Patterns of Disease Progression and Outcome of Patients With Testicular Seminoma Who Relapse After Adjuvant or Curative Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is a possible treatment strategy for patients with testicular seminoma after orchiectomy in clinical stage I or II disease. Little is known about the outcome of patients who experience a relapse after radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from 61 patients who relapsed after adjuvant or curative radiation therapy from 17 centers in 11 countries were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were disease-free and overall survival. Secondary outcomes were time to relapse, stage at relapse, treatment for relapse, and rate of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy for relapse.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 9.9 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-10.9), we found a 5-year disease-free survival of 90% (95% CI, 79-95) and a 5-year overall survival of 98% (95% CI, 89-100). Sixty-six percent of patients had stage III disease at time of relapse and 93% of patients fell into the good prognosis group per the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification. The median time to relapse after radiation therapy was 15.6 months (95% CI, 12-23). Twenty-two (36%) patients relapsed more than 2 years after radiation therapy and 7 (11.5%) patients relapsed more than 5 years after radiation therapy. One-third of relapses was detected owing to patients' symptoms, whereas two-thirds of relapses were detected during routine follow-up. The majority (93%) of cases were treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The rate of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy was 35%. Five patients experienced a second relapse. At last follow-up, 55 patients (90%) were alive without disease. Only 1 patient died owing to disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with seminoma who have relapsed after treatment with radiation therapy alone leads to excellent outcomes. Patients and physicians should be aware of possible late relapses after radiation therapy.

Bacteria-specific CXCL13-producing follicular helper T cells are putative prognostic markers to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma

535

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, have emerged as a successful immunotherapeutic strategy for advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). Therapeutic blockade of PD-1 or PD-L1 with monoclonal antibodies leads to durable tumor regressions in up to 25% metastatic muscle invasive UC (MIBC). Neoadjuvant use of ICI also showed remarkable efficacy and represents a unique opportunity to study immunodynamics during PD-1 blockade to decipher functional predictors of response and resistance. Methods: Patients diagnosed with T2-T4aN0M0 MIBC were treated with 3 cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab before cystectomy in the PANDORE trial (NCT03212651). The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (ypT0N0). Secondary endpoints focused on safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and biomarker analysis. We performed longitudinal analysis of peripheral and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor microbiome as well as soluble factors using high dimensionnal immune phenotyping by mass cytometry, immuno-fluorescence and -histochemistry and multiplex immunoassays. Humoral and cellular recall immune memory against urinary tract commensals were studied. Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled from October 2017 to December 2019. All but 5 (n = 34 patients (87.2%)) proceeded with cystectomy. Ten patients presented with ypT0N0 (29.4%; 95% CI: 15.1 %-47.5 %). Multidimensional biomarkers analysis showed that baseline follicular T helper (Tfh) and post-pembrolizumab tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) and activated B cells were associated with outcome ( p= 0.005, p= 0.01 and p= 0.04, respectively). Plasma CXCL13 (the prototypic chemokine secreted by Tfh and involved in TLS functions) increased after 1 cycle of PD-1 blockade in responders and patients without progression at 24 months ( p= 0.002 and p= 0.0001, respectively). Focusing on MIBC tumor microbiome, we showed that intracellular Gram negative bacteria and other commensals were more frequent in tumoral than in normal urothelium ( p= 0.04). Interestingly, basal CXCL13-secreting CD4+ T cells and IgG directed against urinary pathobionts such as Escherichia coli predicted prolonged PFS ( p= 0.01 and p= 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Our results suggest that urothelial commensals could induce specific Tfh and B cell responses that were re-invigorated by PD-1 blockade and associated with clinical benefit to pembrolizumab. Further analyses are needed to validate the predictive value of commensal-specific Tfh in UC and other epithelial cancers that are directly or indirectly exposed to bacteria. Clinical trial information: NCT03212651.

Primary urethral cancer: A GETUG French nationwide cohort study

430

Background: Primary urethral cancer (PUC) is a rare and heterogeneous malignancy. Due to its scarcity, little data are available on the optimal treatment sequence and survival, especially in metastatic patients. Methods: Data from patients diagnosed with a PUC between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2018 were retrospectively collected from nine French referral centers. Survival rate were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model and the log-rank test. In order to increase the statistical power of survival analysis in the metastatic stage, patients with synchronous and metachronous metastatic disease were pooled. Results: We identified 44 (62%) males and 27 (38%) females with a PUC. The most frequent histological types were urothelial carcinomas (40.0%), squamous cell carcinomas (34.3%) and adenocarcinomas (14.3%). Twenty-five (35.2%) patients were diagnosed at a localized stage (≤ T2, N0, M0); 35 (49.3%) at a locally advanced stage (≥ T3 or ≥ N1, M0) and 11 (15.5%) at a distant stage (M1). Twenty-seven patients had a metachronous metastatic cancer. Multimodality therapy was used in 24.0% and 57.1% of the patients with a localized and locally advanced disease, respectively. In the entire cohort, median overall survival (OS) was 52.5 months (IC95% 32.2 – 64.1) and stage at diagnosis was a predictor of OS (p < 0.0001). For the 60 patients with a non-metastatic disease, 39 (65%) had a recurrence or were dead and the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 21.2 months (IC95% 16.8 – 34.5). Nodal involvement was the only factor associated with DFS (HR: 2.03, p = 0.0390). Multimodal treatment compared with unimodal treatment was not significantly associated with DFS (HR: 1.22, p = 0.5419). Regarding survival of the 38 metastatic patients, the median OS was 15.2 months (IC95% 8.2 – 23.5) and the median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (IC95% 4.4 – 9.8). Conclusions: This retrospective study showed an important heterogeneity in terms of histology, stage at diagnosis, and treatment of PUC. In this cohort, the multimodal approach did not show any improvement in survival of non-metastatic patients. This study is one of the few to describe the survival in metastatic patients.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma patients with BONE metastases: Results of the GETUG: AFU 26 nivoren multicenter phase II study

342

Background: Bone metastases (BM) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are associated with a poor prognosis based on retrospective studies in which patients were treated with antiangiogenic agents. Since the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, few data are available regarding the prognosis impact of BM or the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in patients with bones metastatic RCC. GETUG-AFU26-NIVOREN (NIVOREN) is a French multicenter prospective study in which patients were treated with nivolumab after failure of one or more antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We therefore aim to evaluate the impact of BM on prognosis, and the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with BM enrolled in NIVOREN trial. Methods: All adult patients with BM at inclusion were included in our study. The primary endpoint of this ancillary study was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with BM. Clinical data were collected prospectively, except for SRE data which were collected retrospectively in a complementary consent report form. Results: Among 720 patients treated with nivolumab in the NIVOREN study, 194 had BM at inclusion. After a median follow-up of 23.9 months, the median OS was 17.9 months in patients with BM versus 26.1 months in patients without BM (HR = 1.42 CI95% [1.13-1.79], p = 0.0023). After adjustment on sex, age, IMDC group and line of treatments, the difference was not significant (HR = 1.24, CI95% [0.98-1.56], p = 0.0707). The median PFS was shorter in patients with BM even after adjustment (2.8 versus 4.6 months, HR = 1.30 CI95% [1.08-1.56]), as well as the ORR (14.8% versus 23.3%). The safety profile was similar between patients with or without BM at inclusion. The incidence of SRE in the BM population was 36% during the treatment period with nivolumab. A post-hoc analysis evaluating the impact of bone-targeting agents in association with nivolumab on SRE incidence was performed. There was a statistically significant benefit in patients treated with bone-targeting agents on the incidence of SRE (OR = 0.367, CI95% [0.151-0.895], p = 0.0276). Conclusions: Nivolumab is associated with shorter OS, PFS, and lower ORR in patients with BM. Our study confirms, in the era of immunotherapy that patients with BM are associated with poorer prognosis and suggests that association with bone-targeting agents decreases the incidence of SRE. Clinical trial information: 2015-004117-24.

Features and management of men with pN1 cM0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy: a systematic review of population-based evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To investigate the features and optimal management of pN+ cM0 prostate cancer (PCa) according to registry-based studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Up to 15% of PCa patients harbor lymph node invasion (pN+) at radical prostatectomy plus lymph node dissection. Nonetheless, the optimal management strategy in this setting is not well characterized.

SUMMARY

We performed a systematic review including n = 13 studies. Management strategies comprised 13 536 men undergoing observation, 11 149 adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT), 7,075 adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) +aADT and 705 aRT. Baseline features showed aggressive PCa in the majority of men. At a median follow-up ranging 48-134months, Cancer-related death was 5% and overall-mortality 16.6%. aADT and aRT alone had no cancer-specific survival or overall survival advantages over observation only and over not performing aRT, respectively. aADT plus aRT yielded a survival benefit compared to observation and aADT, which in one study, were limited to certain intermediate-risk categories. Age, Gleason, Charlson score, positive surgical margins, pathological stage, and positive nodes number, but not prostate specific antigen, were most relevant prognostic factors. Our work further confirmed pN+ PCa is a multifaceted disease and will help future research in defining its optimal management based on different risk categories to maximize survival and patient's quality of life.

Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer-Current State and Future Perspectives

Simple Summary

In recent years, evidence regarding survival outcomes of novel therapies has increased significantly. However, less is known regarding the impact of novel therapy combinations on quality of life aspects of the treated patients. In the current comprehensive review, we discuss the importance of quality of life for patients with advanced prostate cancer, and present the most frequently used tools to evaluate quality of life in recent randomized trials. Further, we discuss the ease of use of these validated questionnaires for clinicians and try to focus on the suggested appropriate use as well as potential strategies for improvement of quality of life evaluation in these clinical scenarios of advanced prostate cancer.

Abstract

With the therapeutic landscape of advanced prostate cancer rapidly evolving and oncological benefits being shown for a plethora of new agents and indications, health-related quality of life (HRQOL)-associated evidence is still subpar. In the current comprehensive review, we discuss the importance of HRQOL for patients with advanced PC (metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)), and present the most frequently used tools to evaluate HRQOL in recent randomized trials. Furthermore, we discuss the ease of use of these validated questionnaires for clinicians and try to focus on the suggested appropriate use in clinical practice, as well as potential strategies for improvement of HRQOL evaluation in these clinical scenarios of advanced prostate cancer.

Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenges in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Introduction

Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenges may be a treatment option in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had a good initial response to cabazitaxel and who are still fit to receive it. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of multiple rechallenges.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively identified 22 mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel and/or androgen receptor‐targeted agents who received multiple cabazitaxel rechallenges in 9 French centers. Cabazitaxel was initiated at a dose of 25 mg/m² q3week. A reduced dose (20 mg/m² q3w) or an alternative schedule (mainly 16 mg/m² q2w) was increasingly used for subsequent rechallenges. Progression‐free survival, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response, best clinical response, and grade ≥3 toxicities were collected. Overall survival was calculated from various time points.

Results

Twenty‐two patients with an initial response to cabazitaxel were rechallenged at least twice. The median number of cabazitaxel cycles was 7 at first cabazitaxel treatment, 6 at first rechallenge, and 5 at subsequent rechallenges. Median progression‐free survival at first rechallenge was 9.6 months and 5.6 months at second rechallenge. Median overall survival was 50.9 months from the first cabazitaxel dose, 114.9 months from first life‐extending therapy initiation in mCRPC, and 105 months from mCRPC diagnosis. There was no cumulative grade ≥3 neuropathy or nail disorder and one case of febrile neutropenia.

Conclusion

Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenges may be a treatment option without cumulative toxicity in heavily pretreated patients having a good response to first cabazitaxel use and still fit to receive it.

Novelty & Impact Statements

Patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer can be treated with Cabazitaxel after docetaxel and androgen receptor‐targeted agent. This chemotherapy can be used multiple times with efficacy and manageable toxicity.

A real-world comparison of docetaxel versus abiraterone acetate for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

Background

Docetaxel (D) or secondary hormonal therapy (SHT) each combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) represent possible treatment options in males with metastasized hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Real‐world data comparing different protocols are lacking yet. Thus, our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate (AA)+ADT versus D+ADT in mHSPC.

Methods

In a retrospective multicenter analysis including males with mHSPC treated with either of the aforementioned protocols, overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival 1 (PFS1), and progression‐free survival 2 (PFS2) were assessed for both cohorts. Median time to event was tested by Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank test. The Cox‐proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

Results

Overall, 196 patients were included. The AA+ADT cohort had a longer PFS1 in the log‐rank testing (23 vs. 13 mos., p < 0.001), a longer PFS2 (48 vs. 33 mos., p = 0.006), and longer OS (80 vs. 61 mos., p = 0.040). In the multivariate analyses AA+ADT outperformed D+ADT in terms of PFS1 (HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.183–0.623; p = 0.001) and PFS2 (HR = 0.33 95% CI = 0.128–0.827; p = 0.018), respectively, while OS and toxicity rate were similar between both groups.

Conclusions

AA+ADT is mainly associated with a similar efficacy and overall toxicity rate as D+ADT. Further prospective research is required for validation of the clinical value of the observed benefit of AA+ADT for progression‐free end‐points.

Treatments Outcomes in Histological Variants and Non-Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study

Introduction

Less than one-third of bladder cancers are non-pure urothelial carcinoma [with variant histological (VH) or non-urothelial carcinoma (non-UC)] for which no treatment guidelines are available. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of systemic treatments in VH or non-UC bladder cancers.

Materials

Multicenter retrospective analysis of patients treated for advanced or metastatic VH or non-UC bladder cancers. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to treatment line, regimen and histology subtype. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Between 2005 and 2020, 46 patients from seven centers were included. The median age was 66 years (58.75; 74.75), 65.2% were male and 67.2% presented VH. At first line, the ORR for the entire population was 54.4% and median OS was 21.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.2-38.6). The ORR of the 37 patients treated with chemotherapy at first line was 62.2% with median PFS and OS of 7.3 (95% CI: 4.5-8.6) and 21.6 months (95% CI: 14.2-35.7), respectively. Dose dense MVAC and platinum doublet chemotherapy had the highest ORR (71.4% and 65.2%). The 9 patients treated with immunotherapy at first line had an ORR of 22.2%, a median PFS of 3.3 months (95% CI:2.3-NR) and the median OS was not reached (95% CI:13.8-NR). Response to treatment varied depending on the histological sub-types and on the treatment type.

Conclusion

Chemotherapy and immunotherapy have shown to be effective in VH or non-UC cancers, a rare histological subtype for which we currently have very little data in the literature.

Emerging Targeted Therapy for Bladder Cancer

For the last decade, biology of urothelial tumorigenesis has been widely explored, helping to better understand the molecular pathways in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Until recently, no targeted therapies have been approved in UC. However, several new molecules have shown promising results in metastatic UC: fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors, conjugated antibodies, PARP inhibitors, and antiangiogenics. In this article, the authors review the targeted therapies that are being evaluated in bladder UC.

Response to systemic therapy in fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Fumarate hydratase-deficient (FHdef) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare entity associated with the hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome with no standard therapy approved. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of different systemic treatments in this population.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre retrospective analysis of Fhdef RCC patients to determine the response to systemic treatments. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). The two latter were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Twenty-four Fhdef RCC patients were identified, and 21 under systemic therapy were included in the analysis: ten received cabozantinib, 14 received sunitinib, nine received "other antiangiogenics" (sorafenib, pazopanib, and axitinib), three received erlotinib-bevacizumab (E-B), three received mTOR inhibitors, and 11 received immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). ORR for treatments were 50% for cabozantinib, 43% for sunitinib, 63% for "other antiangiogenics," and 30% for E-B, whereas ORR was 0% for mTOR inhibitors and 18% for ICBs. The median TTF (mTTF) was significantly higher with antiangiogenics (11.6 months) than with mTOR inhibitors (4.4 months) or ICBs (2.7 months). In the first-line setting, antiangiogenics presented a higher ORR compared with nivolumab-ipilimumab (64% versus 25%) and a significantly superior mTTF (11.0 months vs 2.5 months; p = 0.0027). The median OS from the start of the first systemic treatment was 44.0 months (95% confidence interval: 13.0-95.0).

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first European retrospective study of Fhdef RCC patients treated with systemic therapy with a remarkably long median OS of 44.0 months. Our results suggest that antiangiogenics may be superior to ICB/mTOR inhibitors in this population.

How did we take care of our older cancer patients during the first COVID-19 wave? The French experience

BACKGROUND

The management of older cancer patients has been highly challenging for clinicians in a health-care system operating at maximum capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from 9 different institutions. The primary endpoint was to assess the prevalence of adapted patient care during the pandemic for elderly cancer patients. The secondary endpoint was to assess the incidence of hospitalization and mortality due to COVID-19. All patients were older than 65years of age.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 332 outpatients' case files between 9th of March and 30th of April 2020. The median age was 75years (range: 65-101) and 53% were male. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, more than half of the outpatients received modified patient care, defined as postponement or cancellation of surgery, irradiation scheme adapted, systemic treatment or the use of telemedicine. Among patients with localized cancer, 60% had a change in management strategy due to the pandemic. Changes in management strategy were made for 53% of patients at the metastatic stage. GCSF was used , in 83% of patients, increasing considerably in the context of the pandemic. Sixty-nine percent of physicians used telemedicine. In the final analysis, only one patient was hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. No deaths due to COVID-19 were reported in elderly cancer patients during this time period.

CONCLUSION

Our study is the first to assess modification of patient care in elderly cancer outpatients during an epidemic. With this unprecedented crisis, our objective is to protect our patients from infection via protective barrier measures and social distancing, but also to guarantee the continuity of cancer care without overexposing this fragile population. Physicians were able to adapt their practice and used new forms of management, like telemedicine.

Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A therapeutic option to increase overall survival?

97

Background: Cabazitaxel rechallenge could be a more efficient therapy with an acceptable toxicity than docetaxel in the treatment of patients with a metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including patients from 9 centers in France who received 3 lines or more of cabazitaxel from February 2012 to July 2020. Cabazitaxel schedule differed between patients: 25 mg/m2 q3w, 20 mg/m2 q3w, 16 mg/m2 q2w or 10 mg/m2 weekly. Efficacy was assessed by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from each cabazitaxel line start. Only toxicities grade ≥ 3 were reported. Results: Twenty-two patients were included. The median follow-up from mCRPC was 94.7 months, median age at initial diagnosis was 59.5 years old, median ISUP score at diagnosis was 4 and median PSA at diagnosis was 55 ng/ml. Median number of cabazitaxel cycles was 7 at first-line, 6 at first rechallenge, and 5 for subsequent rechallenges. Median OS from mCRPC diagnosis was 105 months. Median PFS from cabazitaxel line start was 11.8 months at first use, 9.6 for first rechallenge and 5.6 in second rechallenge (table). Only one case of febrile neutropenia and 6 events of grade ≥ 3 toxicity were reported. Conclusions: Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenge could efficiently extend OS with manageable toxicities for patients. Even if anti-PARP therapy and immunotherapy are promising treatments, cabazitaxel rechallenge could be also a relevant therapeutic option for long responder patients. Specific biomarkers should be explored to predict the efficacy of cabazitaxel rechallenge. [Table: see text]

Rechallenge of nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, an ambispective multicenter study (RENIVO)

330

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with another ICI or an antiangiogenic targeted therapy have been approved for frontline therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, progression disease (PD) often occurs and subsequent therapies are needed. Rechallenge of ICI may then be an option, but there is a lack of data regarding this strategy. Methods: This ambispective multicenter study included patients who received a rechallenge of Nivolumab (ICI-2) between January 2014 and September 2020, after a first-ICI therapy (ICI-1), regardless of the reason of the discontinuation. Patients could have either a non-ICI therapy or have a prolonged free-interval (≥ 12 weeks) between ICI regimens. Those with ongoing rechallenge at inclusion were followed prospectively. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best ORR. Results: 45 rechallenges were included from 16 centers. Median age was 60 years (range, 42-90), 64% were male. Most of them had clear cell histology (91%) and a Fuhrman or ISUP grade ≥ 3 (80%). Single-agent Nivolumab and Nivolumab-Ipilimumab association were used in 78% and 11% during ICI-1 and in 93% and 7% during ICI-2, respectively. Discontinuation for PD, toxicity or clinical decision occurred in 49%, 27% and 24% for ICI-1 and in 94%, 3% and 3% for ICI-2, respectively. The ORR were 51% (n = 23) at ICI-1 and 16% (n = 7) at ICI-2. One patient had a complete response during both ICI-1 and ICI-2 and two had a partial response at ICI-2 although they had PD as best ICI-1 response. After a median follow-up of 14.9 months (mo), median duration of response for ICI-2 was 5.1 mo (95% CI, 2.7-not reached [NR]). For ICI-1 and ICI-2: median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.4 mo (95% CI, 9.8-23.5) and 3.5 mo (95% CI, 2.8-9.7); median overall survival was NR (95% CI, 37.8-NR) and 24 mo (95% CI, 9.9-NR). Poor prognostic factors for PFS at ICI-2 were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2, presence of liver metastases, inflammatory syndrome and PFS under ICI-1 > 6 months. Grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 24% (n = 11) during ICI-1 but only in 4% (n = 2) during ICI-2. There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: Our study suggests that resumption of ICI with Nivolumab has a moderate efficacy in mRCC and acceptable tolerance. Predictive factors of response are needed to propose this strategy to selected mRCC patients. Larger prospective cohorts are needed to confirm these results. [Table: see text]

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in older patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma: Results of a sub-group analysis of the GETUG-AFU 26 NIVOREN multicenter phase II study

331

Background: NIVOREN GETUG AFU 26 study, is a french multicenter prospective study to evaluate safety and efficacy of Nivolumab (N) in a broad “real world setting” in mRCC after failure of 1 or 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Methods: Between February 2016 and July 2017, 729 pts were enrolled across 27 institutions. Primary objective of the trial was safety assessed by grade ≥ 3 treatment related adverse event (TRAE). We report here results of older patients above 70 years old ([70;75[; [75;80[; ≥ 80) compared with their younger counterparts. Results: Overall, 720 patients were treated (median age 64 (22;90)). Among them 205 pts were ≥ 70 (28.5%) divided as follow: [70-75[:107 (14.9%) / [75-80[: 68 (9,4%) / ≥ 80: 30 (4,2%). Patients’ characteristics (Table) were similar in younger and older patients except for IMDC risk groups (IMDC) classification with less poor prognostic in pts ≥ 75 and fewer brain metastasis in pts ≥ 70. Treatment duration was similar across age groups despite a rate of discontinuation for TRAE increasing with age. Regarding efficacy, there was a non-significant trend toward improved response rate and progression free survival and lower specific survival with increasing age. Conclusions: In this large “real world” setting study a significant number of old pts were included. Prognostic profile appears better in older pts included. There is no signal for an excess of toxicity in this population and efficacy is comparable to younger patients. Age alone should not prevent prescribing N in mRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03013335 . [Table: see text]

Precision immunity: Immunoscore and neoadjuvant treatment in bladder cancer

This review details the clinical utility of Immunoscore, measuring the immune response to cancer within the tumor microenvironment, in bladder cancer. Immunoscore was recently introduced into ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for gastrointestinal cancer and into the WHO classification of the Digestive System Tumors. In muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the standard-of-care treatment is neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy. However, only 50% of the patients are still alive at 5 years. The degree of histologic response positively correlated with Immunoscore and patients at lower risk of relapse or death were associated with a high-Immunoscore. Immunoscore is also predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-based treatment in several indications. This paves the way for the use of Immunoscore in clinical practice not only in gastrointestinal tumors but also in bladder cancer, and beyond.

The Immunoscore in Localized Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Clinical Significance for Pathologic Responses and Overall Survival

Simple Summary

The prognosis of localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer is poor and the prognostic and predictive biomarkers of the response to treatment are lacking. We retrospectively investigated the role of the Immunoscore in the neoadjuvant setting, where the Immunoscore is a standardized quantitative assay of lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment. We found it allowed for the stratification of patient prognoses and the prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Abstract

(1) Background—The five-year overall survival (OS) of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy is around 50%. There is no validated biomarker to guide the treatment decision. We investigated whether the Immunoscore (IS) could predict the pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes. (2) Methods—This retrospective study evaluated the IS in 117 patients treated using neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized MIBC from six centers (France and Greece). Pre-treatment tumor samples were immunostained for CD3+ and CD8+ T cells and quantified to determine the IS. The results were associated with the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, time to recurrence (TTR), and OS. (3) Results—Low (IS-0), intermediate (IS-1–2), and high (IS-3–4) ISs were observed in 36.5, 43.7, and 19.8% of the cohort, respectively. IS was positively associated with a pathologic complete response (pCR; p-value = 0.0096). A high IS was found in 35.7% of patients with a pCR, whereas it was found in 11.3% of patients without a pCR. A low IS was observed in 48.4% of patients with no pCR and in 21.4% of patients with a pCR. Low-, intermediate-, and high-IS patients had five-year recurrence-free rates of 37.2%, 36.5%, and 72.6%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, a high IS was associated with a prolonged TTR (high vs. low: p = 0.0134) and OS (high vs. low: p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions—This study showed the significant prognostic and predictive roles of IS regarding localized MIBC.

Cabazitaxel schedules in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a review

Cabazitaxel (25 mg/m² every 3 weeks) is the standard second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel. It is associated with a risk of neutropenic complications, which may be a barrier to its use in daily clinical practice, particularly in frail elderly patients. Here the authors reviewed key studies conducted with cabazitaxel (TROPIC, PROSELICA, AFFINITY, CARD and the European compassionate use program) and pilot studies with adapted schedules. Based on this review, the use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor from cycle 1 appears crucial to maximize the benefit-risk ratio of cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Preliminary data with alternative schedules look promising, especially for frail patients. Results of the ongoing Phase III CABASTY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02961257) are awaited.

Administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in real life: Are urologists still too cautious?

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is now recommended to treat muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) but is not always executed in real life. This study aims to evaluate the proportion of patients with MIBC who receive an optimal NAC, and to present the predictive factors of its achievement.

METHODS

This monocenter retrospective study included all the patients who underwent radical cystectomy for≥pT2NxM0 MIBC between 2013, January and 2018, December. NAC consisted in 4-6 cycles of MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin) or 4 cycles of GC (gemcitabin, and carboplatin). Demographic (sex, age, ECOG-PS, glomerular filtration rate [GFR], and cN stage), surgical (urinary derivation, time of surgery, blood loss, and complications), and oncological characteristics were analyzed. Multivariate analysis are made to find predictors of administration of NAC.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-seven patients were included. Thirty received CNA (24%). Patients who underwent CNA were younger, with better ECOG and better GFR. Multivariate analysis showed that cN+ stage and better GFR were significantly associated to administration of NAC. Eight patients (27%) couldn't receive an optimal treatment due to toxicity. Perioperative complication rates were similar, with or without NAC. Patients who underwent NAC had a worse GFR after treatment (-17 versus +5mL/min, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Due to the risks of toxicity, NAC can only be proposed to selected population, which is not the current patients. Immunotherapy could allow to treat more patients because of better tolerance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Until recently, continuing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and closely monitoring patients until evolution towards metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were recommended in men with non-metastatic CRPC (nmCRPC). Because delaying the development of metastases and symptoms in these patients is a major issue, several trials have investigated next-generation androgen receptor (AR) axis inhibitors such as apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide in this setting. This review summarizes the recent advances in the management of nmCRPC, highlighting the favourable impact of next-generation AR inhibitors on metastases-free survival, overall survival and other clinically meaningful endpoints.