1
|
Traweek RS, Lyu HG, Witt RG, Snyder RA, Nassif EF, Krijgh DD, Smith JM, Tilney GS, Feng C, Chiang YJ, Torres KE, Roubaud MJ, Scally CP, Hunt KK, Keung EZ, Mericli AF, Roland CL. High Community-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) After Resection of Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4138-4147. [PMID: 38396039 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15074-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although social vulnerability has been associated with worse postoperative and oncologic outcomes in other cancer types, these effects have not been characterized in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. This study evaluated the association of social vulnerability and oncologic outcomes. METHODS The authors conducted a single-institution cohort study of adult patients with primary and locally recurrent extremity or truncal soft tissue sarcoma undergoing resection between January 2016 and December 2021. The social vulnerability index (SVI) was measured on a low (SVI 1-39%, least vulnerable) to high (60-100%, most vulnerable) SVI scale. The association of SVI with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS The study identified 577 patients. The median SVI was 44 (interquartile range [IQR], 19-67), with 195 patients categorized as high SVI and 265 patients as low SVI. The median age, tumor size, histologic subtype, grade, comorbidities, stage, follow-up time, and perioperative chemotherapy and radiation utilization were similar between the high and low SVI cohorts. The patients with high SVI had worse OS (p = 0.07) and RFS (p = 0.016) than the patients with low SVI. High SVI was independently associated with shorter RFS in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.54) but not with OS (HR, 1.47; 95% CI 0.84-2.56). CONCLUSION High community-level social vulnerability appears to be independently associated with worse RFS for patients undergoing resection of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma. The effect of patient and community-level social risk factors should be considered in the treatment of patients with extremity sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond S Traweek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather G Lyu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elise F Nassif
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David D Krijgh
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey M Smith
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gordon S Tilney
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chun Feng
- Pharmacy Informatics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Margaret J Roubaud
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander F Mericli
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Traweek RS, Lyu H, Witt RG, Snyder RA, Nassif EF, Krijgh DD, Smith JM, Tilney GS, Feng C, Chiang YJ, Torres KE, Roubaud MJ, Scally CP, Hunt KK, Keung EZ, Mericli AF, Roland CL. ASO Visual Abstract: High Community-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Recurrence-Free Survival Following Resection of Extremity and Truncal Soft-Tissue Sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4150-4151. [PMID: 38546800 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15201-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond S Traweek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather Lyu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elise F Nassif
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David D Krijgh
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey M Smith
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gordon S Tilney
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chun Feng
- Pharmacy Informatics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Margaret J Roubaud
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander F Mericli
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cope BM, Traweek RS, Lazcano R, Keung EZ, Lazar AJ, Roland CL, Nassif EF. Targeting the Molecular and Immunologic Features of Leiomyosarcoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072099. [PMID: 37046760 PMCID: PMC10093078 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare, aggressive mesenchymal tumor with smooth muscle differentiation. LMS is one of the most common histologic subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma; it most frequently occurs in the extremities, retroperitoneum, or uterus. LMS often demonstrates aggressive tumor biology, with a higher risk of developing distant metastatic disease than most sarcoma histologic types. The prognosis is poor, particularly in patients with uterine disease, and there is a need for the development of more effective therapies. Genetically, LMS is karyotypically complex and characterized by a low tumor mutational burden, with frequent alterations in TP53, RB1, PTEN, and DNA damage response pathways that may contribute to resistance against immune-checkpoint blockade monotherapy. The LMS immune microenvironment is highly infiltrated with tumor-associated macrophages and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, which may represent promising biomarkers. This review provides an overview of the clinical and pathologic behavior of both soft tissue and uterine LMS and summarizes the genomic and immune characteristics of these tumors and how they may provide opportunities for the development of biomarker-based immune therapies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gingrich AA, Nassif EF, Roland CL, Keung EZ. The Landscape of Immunotherapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2144-2158. [PMID: 36826126 PMCID: PMC9955848 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Significant multidisciplinary scientific effort has been undertaken to understand the heterogeneous family of neoplasms that comprise soft tissue sarcomas. Within this family of neoplasms, outcomes for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are currently limited given a lack of effective therapies. In this review, we focus on immunotherapy and its relationship with the common RPS histologic subtypes. Although initial outcomes for RPS patients with immune checkpoint inhibition alone have been somewhat disappointing, subsequent analyses on histologies, the tumor microenvironment, sarcoma immune class, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and genetic analysis for tumor mutational burden have yielded insight into the interplay between sarcomas and immunotherapy. Such approaches have all provided critical insight into the environment and characterization of these tumors, with targets for potential immunotherapy in future clinical trials. With this insight, molecularly tailored combination treatments for improving response rates and oncologic outcomes for RPS are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia A. Gingrich
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elise F. Nassif
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Christina L. Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Emily Z. Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nassif EF, Joseph CP, Lazcano R, Joseph JT, Thirasastr P, Lazar AJ, Somaiah N. Case report: Responses to the combination of gemcitabine with sirolimus in two patients with TSC-mutated sarcomas. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1046442. [PMID: 36845725 PMCID: PMC9947835 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1046442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
TSC-mutated sarcomas are rare molecular and histologic types of sarcoma. Due to the presence of their specific oncogenic driver mutation, these sarcomas are particularly sensitive to mTOR inhibitors. Recently, nab-sirolimus, an albumin-bound mTOR inhibitor, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for PEComas, which harbor a TSC mutation, and this drug remains the only FDA-approved systemic treatment for these tumors. We report on two cases of patients with TSC-mutated sarcomas who experienced significant responses to the combination of gemcitabine and sirolimus, after progression on prior gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and single agent mTOR inhibition with nab-sirolimus. Preclinical and clinical data support rationale for a synergistic effect of the combination. This combination may represent a valid therapeutic option after failure of nab-sirolimus in these patients, with no standard-of-care treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F. Nassif
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Cissimol P. Joseph
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Rossana Lazcano
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jocelyn T. Joseph
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Prapassorn Thirasastr
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States,Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States,Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States,*Correspondence: Neeta Somaiah,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Erstad DJ, Chiang YJ, Witt RG, Cope B, Nassif EF, Scally CP, Torres KE, Feig BW, Hunt KK, Bishop AJ, Guadagnolo BA, Roland CL, Keung EZ. ASO Visual Abstract: Clinical Impact of External Beam Radiotherapy for Surgically Resected Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:941-942. [PMID: 36161369 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12508-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Erstad
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brandon Cope
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Erstad DJ, Chiang YJ, Witt RG, Cope B, Nassif EF, Scally CP, Torres KE, Feig BW, Hunt KK, Bishop AJ, Guadagnolo BA, Roland CL, Keung EZ. Clinical Impact of External Beam Radiotherapy for Surgically Resected Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:926-940. [PMID: 36115928 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12487-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION EORTC-62092 (STRASS) was a phase 3, randomized study that compared surgery alone versus surgery plus neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for retroperitoneal sarcomas. RT was not associated with improved abdominal recurrence-free survival, the primary outcome measure, although on subanalysis, there may have been benefit for well-differentiated (WD) liposarcoma. This study investigated the real-world use and outcomes of RT (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) for the management of retroperitoneal liposarcoma. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004-2017) for patients with nonmetastatic, primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma treated with resection with or without RT (n = 3911). Patients were stratified by treatment type and histology [WD (n = 2252), dedifferentiated (DD) (n = 1659)]. Propensity score (PS) matching was used before comparison of treatment groups. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 4.1 years, and median OS was 10.7 years. There was no association between RT and OS for either WDLPS or DDLPS cohorts. We performed a subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant RT only, similar to STRASS. For WDLPS after PS matching (n = 208), neoadjuvant RT was not associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, p = 0.0523) but was associated with longer postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.012). For DDLPS after PS matching (n = 290), neoadjuvant RT was not associated with OS (HR 1.02, p = 0.889). For both WD-LPS and DD-LPS, utilization of neoadjuvant RT was associated with treatment at high-volume (≥ 10 cases/year) and academic/network facilities. CONCLUSIONS For primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma treated with surgical resection, radiotherapy was not associated with an overall survival benefit in this propensity-matched, adjusted analysis of the NCDB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Erstad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brandon Cope
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thirasastr P, Lin H, Amini B, Wang WL, Cloutier JM, Nassif EF, Keung EZ, Roland CL, Feig B, Araujo D, Benjamin RS, Conley AP, Livingston JA, Ludwig J, Patel S, Ratan R, Ravi V, Zarzour MA, Zhou X, Somaiah N. Retrospective evaluation of the role of gemcitabine-docetaxel in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Cancer Med 2023; 12:4282-4293. [PMID: 36151848 PMCID: PMC9972024 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Well-differentiated (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) account for the majority of liposarcomas. Although gemcitabine-docetaxel is used as second-line treatment in soft tissue sarcomas, its efficacy in WDLPS/DDLPS is not established. This study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of gemcitabine regimens in WDLPS/DDLPS. METHODS All patients with WDLPS or DDLPS who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at our institution between September 2002 and January 2021 were included. Response was evaluated by an independent radiologist using RECIST 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate distributions of survival outcomes and log-rank tests were used to compare survival outcomes between subgroups. RESULTS Sixty-five WDLPS/DDLPS patients were included. Seven patients (10.8%) received a gemcitabine-based regimen more than once, totaling 72 treatments. The median age at the start of treatment was 66 years (range 32-80 years). Sixty-five (90.3%) regimens were gemcitabine-docetaxel, and 7 (9.7%) were gemcitabine alone. Majorities of treatments were for disease that was recurrent/metastatic (86.1%), was abdominal/retroperitoneal (83.3%), and had DDLPS components (88.9%), while 25.0% of treatments were for multifocal disease. The overall response rate was 9.7% (7/72). All responses were in patients with documented DDLPS. The median time to progression was 9.2 months (95% CI 5.3-12.3 months). The median overall survival from the start of therapy was 18.8 months (95% CI 13.1-32.4 months). CONCLUSION Gemcitabine-docetaxel is an efficacious second-line treatment for DDLPS. Though cross study comparisons are not advisable, response to gemcitabine-docetaxel compares favorably to current standard options trabectedin and eribulin. This combination is a valid comparator arm for future second-line trials in DDLPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prapassorn Thirasastr
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Heather Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Behrang Amini
- Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology/Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Cloutier
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology/Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Barry Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dejka Araujo
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert S Benjamin
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony P Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John A Livingston
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joseph Ludwig
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ravin Ratan
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maria Alejandra Zarzour
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xiao Zhou
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nassif EF, Roland CL, Keung EZ. Reflections on the value of multidisciplinary oncology training by a medical oncologist. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:1046-1047. [PMID: 36631346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Traweek RS, Cope BM, Roland CL, Keung EZ, Nassif EF, Erstad DJ. Targeting the MDM2-p53 pathway in dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1006959. [PMID: 36439412 PMCID: PMC9684653 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1006959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is an aggressive adipogenic cancer with poor prognosis. DDLPS tumors are only modestly sensitive to chemotherapy and radiation, and there is a need for more effective therapies. Genetically, DDLPS is characterized by a low tumor mutational burden and frequent chromosomal structural abnormalities including amplification of the 12q13-15 chromosomal region and the MDM2 gene, which are defining features of DDLPS. The MDM2 protein is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the tumor suppressor, p53, for proteasomal degradation. MDM2 amplification or overexpression in human malignancies is associated with cell-cycle progression and worse prognosis. The MDM2-p53 interaction has thus garnered interest as a therapeutic target for DDLPS and other malignancies. MDM2 binds p53 via a hydrophobic protein interaction that is easily accessible with synthetic analogues. Multiple agents have been developed, including Nutlins such as RG7112 and small molecular inhibitors including SAR405838 and HDM201. Preclinical in vitro and animal models have shown promising results with MDM2 inhibition, resulting in robust p53 reactivation and cancer cell death. However, multiple early-phase clinical trials have failed to show a benefit with MDM2 pathway inhibition for DDLPS. Mechanisms of resistance are being elucidated, and novel inhibitors and combination therapies are currently under investigation. This review provides an overview of these strategies for targeting MDM2 in DDLPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond S. Traweek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Brandon M. Cope
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Christina L. Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Emily Z. Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Elise F. Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Derek J. Erstad
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lazcano R, Barreto CM, Salazar R, Carapeto F, Traweek RS, Leung CH, Gite S, Mehta J, Ingram DR, Wani KM, Vu KAT, Parra ER, Lu W, Zhou J, Witt RG, Cope B, Thirasastr P, Lin HY, Scally CP, Conley AP, Ratan R, Livingston JA, Zarzour AM, Ludwig J, Araujo D, Ravi V, Patel S, Benjamin R, Wargo J, Wistuba II, Somaiah N, Roland CL, Keung EZ, Solis L, Wang WL, Lazar AJ, Nassif EF. The immune landscape of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1008484. [PMID: 36313661 PMCID: PMC9597628 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1008484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) can be associated with a relatively dense immune infiltration. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1, anti-PDL1, and anti-CTLA4) are effective in 20% of UPS patients. We characterize the immune microenvironment of UPS and its association with oncologic outcomes. Material and methods Surgically resected UPS samples were stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the following: tumor-associated immune cells (CD3, CD8, CD163, CD20), immune checkpoints (stimulatory: OX40, ICOS; inhibitory: PD-L1, LAG3, IDO1, PD1), and the adenosine pathway (CD73, CD39). Sections were reviewed for the presence of lymphoid aggregates (LA). Clinical data were retrospectively obtained for all samples. The Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare distributions. Correlations between biomarkers were measured by Spearman correlation. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to identify biomarkers associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Unsupervised clustering was performed, and Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests used for comparison of OS and DFS between immune clusters. Results Samples analyzed (n=105) included 46 primary tumors, 34 local recurrences, and 25 metastases. LA were found in 23% (n=10/43), 17% (n=4/24), and 30% (n=7/23) of primary, recurrent, and metastatic samples, respectively. In primary UPS, CD73 expression was significantly higher after preoperative radiation therapy (p=0.009). CD39 expression was significantly correlated with PD1 expression (primary: p=0.002, recurrent: p=0.004, metastatic: p=0.001), PD-L1 expression (primary: p=0.009), and CD3+ cell densities (primary: p=0.016, recurrent: p=0.043, metastatic: p=0.028). In recurrent tumors, there was a strong correlation between CD39 and CD73 (p=0.015), and both were also correlated with CD163+ cell densities (CD39 p=0.013; CD73 p<0.001). In multivariate analyses, higher densities of CD3+ and CD8+ cells (Cox Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.33; p=0.010) were independently associated with OS (CD3+, HR=0.19, p<0.001; CD8+, HR= 0.33, p=0.010) and DFS (CD3+, HR=0.34, p=0.018; CD8+, HR=0.34, p= 0.014). Unsupervised clustering of IHC values revealed three immunologically distinct clusters: immune high, intermediate, and low. In primary tumors, these clusters were significantly associated with OS (log-rank p<0.0001) and DFS (p<0.001). Conclusion We identified three immunologically distinct clusters of UPS Associated with OS and DFS. Our data support further investigations of combination anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and adenosine pathway inhibitors in UPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rossana Lazcano
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Carmelia M. Barreto
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ruth Salazar
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Fernando Carapeto
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Raymond S. Traweek
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Cheuk H. Leung
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Swati Gite
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jay Mehta
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Davis R. Ingram
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Khalida M. Wani
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kim-Anh T. Vu
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Edwin R. Parra
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Wei Lu
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jianling Zhou
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Russell G. Witt
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Brandon Cope
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Prapassorn Thirasastr
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Heather Y. Lin
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Christopher P. Scally
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anthony P. Conley
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ravin Ratan
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - J. Andrew Livingston
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alexandra M. Zarzour
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Joseph Ludwig
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Dejka Araujo
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Robert Benjamin
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jennifer Wargo
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ignacio I. Wistuba
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Christina L. Roland
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Emily Z. Keung
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Luisa Solis
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Elise F. Nassif
- Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: Elise F. Nassif,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Witt RG, Cope B, Erstad DJ, Chiang YJ, Nassif EF, Scally CP, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Roland CL, Keung EZ. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Formal Lymphadenectomy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single Center Experience of 86 Consecutive Cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7092-7100. [PMID: 35501583 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11803-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node metastases (LNMs) are rare in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and there is limited evidence to guide clinical management. We describe our experience with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and lymphadenectomy in STS patients. METHODS A single-center, retrospective review was performed for patients with STS treated with SLNB and/or lymphadenectomy from 1994 to 2018. Clinicopathologic characteristics, multimodality treatment, regional/distant recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were examined. RESULTS Eighty-six patients underwent SLNB (n = 34) and/or lymphadenectomy (n = 60) for STS. The most frequent histologic subtypes were epithelioid, clear cell, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Eight of 34 (23.5%) patients had a positive SLNB with 5-year OS of 71.4% compared with 71.9% for those with a negative SLNB. Eight of the 26 SLN-negative patients (30.8%) eventually developed nodal recurrence (n = 2) and/or (n = 6) distant metastasis with an estimated 5-year OS of 50%. Of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy, estimated 5-year OS was 44.6% and median RFS was 12 months. Eight (13.3%) had distant disease at time of lymphadenectomy, 20 (33.3%) developed distant recurrence after lymphadenectomy, and 6 (10%) developed regional-only recurrence. Patients with regional-only recurrence after lymphadenectomy had an estimated 5-year OS of 66.7% compared with 29.1% for those who recurred distantly. CONCLUSIONS Patients with positive SLNB had similar survival to those with negative SLNB. Lymphadenectomy for isolated nodal disease is associated with poor RFS but reasonable 5-year OS when recurrence is regional-only. In STS, regional disease appears clinically distinct from distant metastatic disease and has better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brandon Cope
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Derek J Erstad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nassif EF, Wu CC, Akdemir K, Witt RG, Traweek R, Cope B, Thirasastr P, Tate T, Mathew G, Crosby S, Chu R, Mohammad M, Shaw K, Davis I, Wani K, Lazar AJ, Wang WL, Duncan S, Guadagnolo AB, Bishop AJ, Lewis V, Bird JE, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Scally CP, Ratan R, Patel S, Benjamin RS, Satcher R, McBride K, Fridman WH, Wistuba I, Futreal A, Wargo JA, Somaiah N, Roland CL, Keung EZ. Abstract PR002: Antigen presentation and processing pathway is associated with early relapse after neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS). Clin Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sarcomas22-pr002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the activity of neoadjuvant ICB in localized resectable DDLPS (n=17) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS; n=10). DDLPS and UPS patients were randomized to neoadjuvant nivolumab or ipilimumab+nivolumab, with UPS patients receiving concurrent radiotherapy. We assessed genomic markers of early relapse (progression before surgery or relapse within 52 weeks following surgery) using longitudinally acquired tumor samples. Methods: RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) were performed on longitudinally acquired samples (baseline biopsies and surgical specimens). Differential gene expression between any two groups of patients (i.e., non-early relapse [non-relapsers] vs early relapse [relapsers]) were selected (fold change>1.5 and p value<0.05). Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) of KEGG pathways were performed and a network-based approach used to identify genes/pathways associated with MHC-I. Results: At a median follow-up of 23 months, 12 patients (9 DDLPS, 3 UPS) relapsed, including 7 early relapses (relapsers: 5 DDLPS, 2 UPS). The median relapse-free survival was 22 months in DDLPS patients (6 months in relapsers; not reached [NR] in non-relapsers) and NR in UPS patients. At baseline, the most differentially upregulated pathways in non-relapsers compared to relapsers were “graft versus host disease” (GSEA Normalized Enrichment Score[NES]=2.25; False Discovery Rate[FDR] q= 0.009), “natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity” (NES=2.17; FDR q=0.009), “antigen processing and presentation” (NES=2.16; FDR q=0.009), “allograft rejection” (NES=1.99; FDR q=0.019) and “B-cell receptor signaling pathway” (NES=1.87; FDR q=0.018). In DDLPS patients, the antigen presentation and processing pathway was the most upregulated pathway in non-relapsers compared to relapsers (NES=2.01; FDR q=0.025) while it was not significantly upregulated in UPS (NES=1.15; FDR q=0.62). When looking at pathways longitudinally, the antigen presentation and processing pathway was significantly upregulated at surgery compared to baseline in DDLPS. As antigen presentation and processing was significantly upregulated in DDLPS patients and associated with relapse, we looked for expressed neoantigens that may be processed and presented. Using WGS, we detected 5712 rearrangements at baseline in DDLPS, of which 230 were found in more than one tumor specimen. We also sought to identify genes associated with MHC-I. We selected genes upregulated during ICB comparing baseline to surgical specimens in DDLPS relapsers and looked at the top 10% of genes associated with MHC-I in order to identify potential therapeutic targets for combination. We identified 41 genes upregulated during ICB and associated with MHC-I in relapsers, for which up to 275 inhibitory compounds were found in drug databases. Conclusion: Antigen presentation and processing is a major driver of response to immunotherapy. Future efforts should focus on identifying which antigens are presented to find synergizing compounds in order to increase the clinical benefit of ICB.
Citation Format: Elise F. Nassif, Chia-Chin Wu, Kadir Akdemir, Russell G. Witt, Raymond Traweek, Brandon Cope, Prapassorn Thirasastr, Taylor Tate, Grace Mathew, Shadarra Crosby, Randy Chu, Mohammad Mohammad, Kenna Shaw, Ingram Davis, Khalida Wani, Alexander J. Lazar, Wei-Lien Wang, Sheila Duncan, Ashleigh B. Guadagnolo, Andrew J. Bishop, Valerae Lewis, Justin E. Bird, Keila E. Torres, Kelly K. Hunt, Barry W. Feig, Christopher P. Scally, Ravin Ratan, Shreyaskumar Patel, Robert S. Benjamin, Robert Satcher, Kevin McBride, Wolf H. Fridman, Ignacio Wistuba, Andrew Futreal, Jennifer A. Wargo, Neeta Somaiah, Christina L. Roland, Emily Z. Keung. Antigen presentation and processing pathway is associated with early relapse after neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PR002.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F. Nassif
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Chia-Chin Wu
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Kadir Akdemir
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Russell G. Witt
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Raymond Traweek
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Brandon Cope
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | - Taylor Tate
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Grace Mathew
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Shadarra Crosby
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Randy Chu
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | - Kenna Shaw
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Ingram Davis
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Khalida Wani
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | - Wei-Lien Wang
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Sheila Duncan
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | | | - Valerae Lewis
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Justin E. Bird
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Keila E. Torres
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Kelly K. Hunt
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Barry W. Feig
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | - Ravin Ratan
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | | | - Robert Satcher
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Kevin McBride
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | - Ignacio Wistuba
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | - Andrew Futreal
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | - Neeta Somaiah
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| | | | - Emily Z. Keung
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Somaiah N, Conley AP, Parra ER, Lin H, Amini B, Solis Soto L, Salazar R, Barreto C, Chen H, Gite S, Haymaker C, Nassif EF, Bernatchez C, Mitra A, Livingston JA, Ravi V, Araujo DM, Benjamin R, Patel S, Zarzour MA, Sabir S, Lazar AJ, Wang WL, Daw NC, Zhou X, Roland CL, Cooper ZA, Rodriguez-Canales J, Futreal A, Soria JC, Wistuba II, Hwu P. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab in advanced or metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcomas: a single-centre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1156-1166. [PMID: 35934010 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few standard treatment options are available for patients with metastatic sarcomas. We did this trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and changes in the tumour microenvironment for durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 drug, and tremelimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 drug, across multiple sarcoma subtypes. METHODS In this single-centre phase 2 trial, done at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX USA), patients aged 18 years or older with advanced or metastatic sarcoma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 who had received at least one previous line of systemic therapy were enrolled in disease subtype-specific groups (liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, angiosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, osteosarcoma, alveolar soft-part sarcoma, chordoma, and other sarcomas). Patients received 1500 mg intravenous durvalumab and 75 mg intravenous tremelimumab for four cycles, followed by durvalumab alone every 4 weeks for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 weeks in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who received at least one dose of treatment). Safety was also analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02815995, and is completed. FINDINGS Between Aug 17, 2016, and April 9, 2018, 62 patients were enrolled, of whom 57 (92%) received treatment and were included in the intention-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 37·2 months (IQR 1·8-10·1), progression-free survival at 12 weeks was 49% (95% CI 36-61). 21 grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported, the most common of which were increased lipase (four [7%] of 57 patients), colitis (three [5%] patients), and pneumonitis (three [5%] patients). Nine (16%) patients had a treatment related serious adverse event. One patient had grade 5 pneumonitis and colitis. INTERPRETATION The combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab is an active treatment regimen for advanced or metastatic sarcoma and merits evaluation in specific subsets in future trials. FUNDING AstraZeneca.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Anthony P Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Edwin Roger Parra
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Behrang Amini
- Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luisa Solis Soto
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ruth Salazar
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carmelia Barreto
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Honglei Chen
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Swati Gite
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Akash Mitra
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Andrew Livingston
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dejka M Araujo
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Benjamin
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria A Zarzour
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sharjeel Sabir
- Department of General Interventional Radiology, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology-Lab Medicine Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology-Lab Medicine Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Najat C Daw
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiao Zhou
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zachary A Cooper
- Oncology Research & Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | | | - Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Charles Soria
- General Director, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nassif EF, Cope B, Traweek R, Witt RG, Erstad DJ, Scally CP, Thirasastr P, Zarzour MA, Ludwig J, Benjamin R, Bishop AJ, Guadagnolo BA, Ingram D, Wani K, Wang WL, Lazar AJ, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Roland CL, Somaiah N, Keung EZ. Real-world use of palbociclib monotherapy in retroperitoneal liposarcomas at a large volume sarcoma center. Int J Cancer 2022; 150:2012-2024. [PMID: 35128664 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Palbociclib has been evaluated in early phase trials for well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) patients, with reported median progression-free survival (PFS) of 18 weeks. Here, we report on real-world use and surgical outcomes associated with palbociclib treatment. We retrospectively reviewed 61 consecutive patients with retroperitoneal WDLPS (n = 14) or DDLPS (n = 47) treated with palbociclib monotherapy between 1 March 2016 and 28 February 2021 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. At palbociclib initiation, median age was 64 (interquartile range [IQR] 56-72). In WDLPS and DDLPS cohorts, the median number of prior systemic treatments was 0 (IQR 0-0) and 2 (IQR 0-4), respectively. Median number of prior surgeries was 2 (WDLPS IQR 1-2.75) and 2 (DDLPS IQR 1-3). Median PFS was 9.2 (WDLPS IQR 3.9-21.9) and 2.6 months (DDLPS IQR 2.0-6.1), with median time on treatment of 7.4 months (WDLPS IQR 3.5-14.2) and 2.7 months (DDLPS IQR 2.0-5.7). Twelve patients ultimately underwent surgical resection. Resections were macroscopically complete (R0/R1) in half (n = 6/12), among whom only one patient experienced relapse after resection (median follow-up 7.5 months). All patients who underwent macroscopically incomplete resections progressed after surgery with median time to progression of 3.3 months (IQR 2.3-4.4). Surgery after palbociclib treatment was not associated with improved overall survival. Efficacy of palbociclib monotherapy for patients with advanced WDLPS and DDLPS is disappointing. While palbociclib may have been used to delay surgery, there was no clear benefit from treatment and few patients achieved prolonged tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Brandon Cope
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Raymond Traweek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Derek J Erstad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Prapassorn Thirasastr
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maria Alejandra Zarzour
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joseph Ludwig
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert Benjamin
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Davis Ingram
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Khalida Wani
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Keung EZY, Nassif EF, Lin HY, Lazar AJ, Torres KE, Wang WL, Guadagnolo BA, Bishop AJ, Hunt K, Feig BW, Bird JE, Lewis VO, Ratan R, Patel S, Zelazowska M, Liu B, McBride K, Wargo JA, Roland CL, Somaiah N. Randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade for surgically resectable undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS): Survival results after 2 years of follow-up and intratumoral B-cell receptor (BCR) correlates. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.17_suppl.lba11501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
LBA11501 Background: We conducted a randomized, phase II non-comparative trial evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant ICB [nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab] in patients (pts) with surgically resectable retroperitoneal DDLPS or extremity/truncal UPS treated with concurrent neoadjuvant radiation therapy (XRT, UPS only). Methods: As of February 28 2022, all pts have a minimum follow-up of 2 years from the start of ICB treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan Meier method. The association of pathologic response (percent hyalinization and viable tumor at surgery) with PFS and OS was assessed using Cox univariate models. Comparison of survival curves was done by log-rank method. The intratumoral BCR repertoire was evaluated by bulk tumor RNA sequencing with TRUST4 algorithm, on biopsy specimens collected at baseline. Description of the intratumoral BCR repertoire included diversity by inverse Simpson index, and clonal distribution by Gini coefficient. High and low categories were defined by median values. Results: At a median follow-up of 31 months (interquartile range [IQR]=27-43) since start of ICB treatment, the median PFS was not reached (NR) in UPS (IQR=19-NR) and 18 months for DDLPS (IQR=8-NR), with 13 pts experiencing relapse (2 UPS, 11 DDLPS) and 2 pts who had progressive metastatic disease on treatment (1 UPS, 1 DDLPS). Five pts died of disease relapse (1 UPS, 4 DDLPS) and the median OS was NR. There was no association between percent hyalinization at surgery and PFS (Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.98, p=0.12) or OS (HR=0.99, p=0.60) nor between percent viable tumor at surgery and PFS (HR=1.00, p=0.62) or OS (HR=1.00, p=0.67). There was no association between RECIST response and PFS (p=0.67) or OS (p=0.67). The median BCR heavy chain (IgH) clonal counts detected at baseline was 2,536 per sample (IQR=82-7,680), and the median BCR light chain (IgL) clonal count was 8,870 per sample (IQR=306-30,214). Pts with higher intratumoral BCR clonality and diversity at baseline tended to have longer PFS (Table). High BCR IgH clonality was significantly associated with OS (p=0.02) with consistent trends in each histotype (DDLPS: p=0.06; UPS: p=0.25). Conclusions: Survival results demonstrate efficacy of ICB with XRT in UPS but there is a crucial need to define better predictive markers of survival after neoadjuvant therapy. Further characterization of the BCR repertoire is ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03307616. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elise F Nassif
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Heather Y. Lin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Kelly Hunt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Barry W. Feig
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Justin E. Bird
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Valerae O. Lewis
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ravin Ratan
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Bin Liu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kevin McBride
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Neeta Somaiah
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nassif EF, Chelvanambi M, Chen L, Wu CC, Damania A, Keung EZY, Witt RG, White M, Ajami NJ, Wong MC, Somaiah N, Sepesi B, Basu S, Allison JP, Sharma P, McBride K, Fridman WH, Wargo JA, Cascone T, Roland CL. Identifying gut microbial signatures associated with B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) in response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.2511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2511 Background: While ICB has significantly improved clinical outcomes across several cancer types, only 15-20% of patients develop a durable response. Thus, novel and targetable biomarkers are needed. There is increased appreciation of the role of the gut microbiome, and TLS and B-cells in the TME in response to ICB. Here, we investigate the association between these two determinants of response in patient specimens from three randomized phase 2 neoadjuvant ICB trials of nivolumab +/- ipilimumab (melanoma (MEL; NCT02519322; n=23), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; NCT03158129; n=31), sarcoma (SARC; NCT02301039; n=17). Methods: Patients were categorized as responders (R) or non-responders (NR) based on major pathologic response, as defined in each histotype (MEL and NSCLC viable tumor ≤10%; SARC hyalinization>30%). Baseline fecal samples were profiled via 16S rRNA gene sequencing from all three cohorts to assess the composition of patient gut microbiomes. Transcriptional profiles of biopsies collected pre-ICB for MEL and SARC, and post-ICB for MEL, SARC, and NSCLC were used to assess TLS (CXCL13, CCL18, CCL19, CCL21) and B-cell (PAX5, CD79B, CR2, MS4A1) signatures in the TME, by calculated mean values of normalized gene expressions. Comparison between samples were carried out using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: There were 21 R overall (NSCLC n=9; MEL n=9; SARC n=3). Despite significant differences in alpha and beta diversity across cohorts, relative abundance of Ruminococcus was significantly higher in R (p=0.003; NSCLC p<0.001; MEL p=0.049; SARC p=0.7). B-cell signature was significantly higher post-ICB in R (R vs NR, post, TLS p=0.13; B-cell p=0.003), with consistent trends in each cohort. Longitudinal evaluation of transcriptional profiles showed that expression of TLS and B-cell signatures increased with treatment in R (pre vs post, MEL and SARC; TLS p=0.0098; B-cell p<0.001) but not NR (pre vs post; TLS p= 0.87; B-cell p= 0.15), with consistent trends in sarcoma and melanoma subgroups. Combined correlative analysis with matched specimen showed that patients with higher pre-ICB relative abundance of Ruminococcus (above median) had significant increase in B-cell signatures (pre vs post, MEL and SARC; TLS p=0.052; B-cell p=0.002) which was not seen in patients with low abundance (below median) of Ruminococcus (pre vs post, MEL and SARC; TLS p=0.56; B-cell p=0.69). Conclusions: Unifying signatures in the gut microbiome are associated with response to ICB and increased B-cell infiltration and TLS formation in the TME. We expect these findings to energize mechanistic studies and new microbiome-based interventional approaches to improve clinical outcomes with ICB. Clinical trial information: NCT02519322, NCT03158129, NCT02301039.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F Nassif
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Lili Chen
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chia-Chin Wu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ashish Damania
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Michael White
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nadim J. Ajami
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Neeta Somaiah
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Boris Sepesi
- Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sreyashi Basu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Immunology, Houston, TX
| | | | - Padmanee Sharma
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kevin McBride
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Tina Cascone
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Witt RG, Cope B, Erstad DJ, Chiang YJ, Nassif EF, Scally CP, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Roland CL, Keung EZ. ASO Visual Abstract: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Formal Lymphadenectomy For Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Single-Center Experience of 86 Consecutive Cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11881-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
19
|
Nassif EF, Blay JY, Massard C, Dufresne A, Brahmi M, Cassier P, Ray-Coquard I, Pautier P, Leary A, Sunyach MP, Bahleda R, Levy A, Le Pechoux C, Honoré C, Mir O, Le Cesne A. Early phase trials in soft-tissue sarcomas: clinical benefit of inclusion in early lines of treatment, molecular screening, and histology-driven trials. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100425. [PMID: 35255445 PMCID: PMC9058915 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E F Nassif
- Cancer Medicine Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. https://twitter.com/NassifElise
| | - J-Y Blay
- Cancer Medicine Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. https://twitter.com/jeanyvesblay
| | - C Massard
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. https://twitter.com/drcmassard
| | - A Dufresne
- Cancer Medicine Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - M Brahmi
- Cancer Medicine Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - P Cassier
- Early Phase Trial Unit, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Cancer Medicine Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. https://twitter.com/CoquardRay
| | - P Pautier
- Cancer Medicine Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Leary
- Cancer Medicine Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M-P Sunyach
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - R Bahleda
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Levy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C Le Pechoux
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C Honoré
- Surgical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - O Mir
- Ambulatory Cancer Care Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Le Cesne
- International Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roulleaux Dugage M, Nassif EF, Italiano A, Bahleda R. Improving Immunotherapy Efficacy in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: A Biomarker Driven and Histotype Tailored Review. Front Immunol 2021; 12:775761. [PMID: 34925348 PMCID: PMC8678134 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.775761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Anti-PD-(L)1 therapies yield a disappointing response rate of 15% across soft-tissue sarcomas, even if some subtypes benefit more than others. The proportions of TAMs and TILs in their tumor microenvironment are variable, and this heterogeneity correlates to histotype. Tumors with a richer CD8+ T cell, M1 macrophage, and CD20+ cells infiltrate have a better prognosis than those infiltrated by M0/M2 macrophages and a high immune checkpoint protein expression. PD-L1 and CD8+ infiltrate seem correlated to response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but tertiary lymphoid structures have the best predictive value and have been validated prospectively. Trials for combination therapies are ongoing and focus on the association of ICI with chemotherapy, achieving encouraging results especially with pembrolizumab and doxorubicin at an early stage, or ICI with antiangiogenics. A synergy with oncolytic viruses is seen and intratumoral talimogene laherpavec yields an impressive 35% ORR when associated to pembrolizumab. Adoptive cellular therapies are also of great interest in tumors with a high expression of cancer-testis antigens (CTA), such as synovial sarcomas or myxoid round cell liposarcomas with an ORR ranging from 20 to 50%. It seems crucial to adapt the design of clinical trials to histology. Leiomyosarcomas are characterized by complex genomics but are poorly infiltrated by immune cells and do not benefit from ICI. They should be tested with PIK3CA/AKT inhibition, IDO blockade, or treatments aiming at increasing antigenicity (radiotherapy, PARP inhibitors). DDLPS are more infiltrated and have higher PD-L1 expression, but responses to ICI remain variable across clinical studies. Combinations with MDM2 antagonists or CDK4/6 inhibitors may improve responses for DDLPS. UPS harbor the highest copy number alterations (CNA) and mutation rates, with a rich immune infiltrate containing TLS. They have a promising 15-40% ORR to ICI. Trials for ICB should focus on immune-high UPS. Association of ICI with FGFR inhibitors warrants further exploration in the immune-low group of UPS. Finally translocation-related sarcomas are heterogeneous, and although synovial sarcomas a poorly infiltrated and have a poor response rate to ICI, ASPS largely benefit from ICB monotherapy or its association with antiangiogenics agents. Targeting specific neoantigens through vaccine or adoptive cellular therapies is probably the most promising approach in synovial sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Roulleaux Dugage
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Elise F. Nassif
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Rastislav Bahleda
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et des Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nassif EF, Maloney N, Conley AP, Keung EZ. Disseminated Coccidioidomycosis Following COVID-19 Mimicking Metastatic Thoracic Relapse of Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma: A Case Report. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:715939. [PMID: 34589500 PMCID: PMC8473730 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.715939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: COVID-19 is associated with immune dysregulation which may increase susceptibility to atypical infectious diseases, particularly in the vulnerable cancer patient population. Coccidioidomycosis is an endemic fungal infection which presents with mild-to-moderate pneumonia in most cases. Case Presentation: The presented case is a 67-year-old woman living in the southwestern United States who is under close observation for well-differentiated liposarcoma of the abdominal wall. She presented with persistent cough and fatigue following COVID-19 infection. Imaging revealed new pulmonary nodules, a chest wall mass and bone lesions. The imaging appearance of these lesions was consistent with metastatic disease, although distant metastasis is not typical in well-differentiated liposarcoma. Biopsy of the chest wall mass revealed granulomatous fungal infection and serology was positive for coccidioidomycosis. At the time of diagnosis, the patient was lymphopenic, possibly a sequela of recent COVID-19 infection and which may have contributed to the development of her atypical disseminated form of coccidioidomycosis. Patient was treated with fluconazole for the coccidioidomycosis and continued observation for mild progression of the liposarcoma. On follow-up imaging, the chest wall mass and lung nodules have decreased in size and the patient remains on antifungal treatment. There has been no further increase in the liposarcoma mass. Conclusion: COVID-19 may be associated with increased risk of atypical forms of infectious diseases in cancer patients, which physicians should be aware of before giving systemic treatments for cancer. In endemic regions, co-infection by coccidioidomycosis should be suspected in cases of persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nolan Maloney
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Anthony P Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nassif EF, Auclin E, Bahleda R, Honoré C, Mir O, Dumont S, Mery B, Hodroj K, Brahmi M, Trédan O, Ray-Coquard I, Blay JY, Massard C, Le Cesne A, Dufresne A. TP53 Mutation as a Prognostic and Predictive Marker in Sarcoma: Pooled Analysis of MOSCATO and ProfiLER Precision Medicine Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3362. [PMID: 34282771 PMCID: PMC8268242 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: locally resected high-grade sarcomas relapse in 40% of cases. There is no prognostic or predictive genomic marker for response to peri-operative chemotherapy. (2) Methods: MOSCATO and ProfiLER are pan-tumor prospective precision medicine trials for advanced tumors. Molecular analysis in both trials comprised targeted next-generation sequencing and comparative genomic hybridization array. We investigated if molecular alterations identified in these trials in sarcomas were associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and response to anthracyclines. (3) Results: this analysis included 215 sarcomas, amongst which 53 leiomyosarcomas, 27 rhabdomyosarcomas, 20 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas, and 17 liposarcomas. The most frequently altered gene was TP53 (46 mutations and eight deletions). There were 149 surgically resected localized sarcomas. Median DFS in TP53 wild type (WT), deleted, and mutated sarcomas was 16, 10, and 10 months, respectively (p = 0.028; deletions: HR = 1.55; 95% CI = 0.75-3.19; mutations: HR = 1.70; 95%CI = 1.13-2.64). In multivariate analysis, TP53 mutations remained associated with shorter DFS (p = 0.027; HR = 2.30; 95%CI = 1.10-4.82). There were 161 localized and advanced sarcomas evaluable for response to anthracyclines. Objective response rates were 35% and 55% in TP53 WT and mutated sarcomas, respectively (OR = 2.24; 95%CI = 1.01-5.03; p = 0.05). In multivariate analysis, TP53 mutations remained associated with increased response (OR = 3.24; 95%CI = 1.30-8.45; p = 0.01). (4) Conclusions: TP53 mutations are associated with shorter DFS and increased response to anthracyclines. Post-validation, these findings could assist in decision-making for peri-operative treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F. Nassif
- Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology Department, 69008 Lyon, France; (E.F.N.); (B.M.); (K.H.); (M.B.); (O.T.); (I.R.-C.); (J.-Y.B.); (A.D.)
| | - Edouard Auclin
- Oncology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France;
| | - Rastilav Bahleda
- DITEP (Département d’Innovation Therapeutique et d’Essais Précoces), Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France; (R.B.); (C.M.)
| | - Charles Honoré
- Surgical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| | - Olivier Mir
- Ambulatory Cancer Care Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| | - Sarah Dumont
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| | - Benoite Mery
- Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology Department, 69008 Lyon, France; (E.F.N.); (B.M.); (K.H.); (M.B.); (O.T.); (I.R.-C.); (J.-Y.B.); (A.D.)
| | - Khalil Hodroj
- Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology Department, 69008 Lyon, France; (E.F.N.); (B.M.); (K.H.); (M.B.); (O.T.); (I.R.-C.); (J.-Y.B.); (A.D.)
| | - Mehdi Brahmi
- Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology Department, 69008 Lyon, France; (E.F.N.); (B.M.); (K.H.); (M.B.); (O.T.); (I.R.-C.); (J.-Y.B.); (A.D.)
| | - Olivier Trédan
- Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology Department, 69008 Lyon, France; (E.F.N.); (B.M.); (K.H.); (M.B.); (O.T.); (I.R.-C.); (J.-Y.B.); (A.D.)
| | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology Department, 69008 Lyon, France; (E.F.N.); (B.M.); (K.H.); (M.B.); (O.T.); (I.R.-C.); (J.-Y.B.); (A.D.)
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology Department, 69008 Lyon, France; (E.F.N.); (B.M.); (K.H.); (M.B.); (O.T.); (I.R.-C.); (J.-Y.B.); (A.D.)
| | - Christophe Massard
- DITEP (Département d’Innovation Therapeutique et d’Essais Précoces), Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France; (R.B.); (C.M.)
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| | - Armelle Dufresne
- Centre Léon Bérard, Medical Oncology Department, 69008 Lyon, France; (E.F.N.); (B.M.); (K.H.); (M.B.); (O.T.); (I.R.-C.); (J.-Y.B.); (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
This review details the clinical utility of Immunoscore, measuring the immune response to cancer within the tumor microenvironment, in bladder cancer. Immunoscore was recently introduced into ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for gastrointestinal cancer and into the WHO classification of the Digestive System Tumors. In muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the standard-of-care treatment is neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy. However, only 50% of the patients are still alive at 5 years. The degree of histologic response positively correlated with Immunoscore and patients at lower risk of relapse or death were associated with a high-Immunoscore. Immunoscore is also predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-based treatment in several indications. This paves the way for the use of Immunoscore in clinical practice not only in gastrointestinal tumors but also in bladder cancer, and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F Nassif
- Oncology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Oncology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Oncology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Galon
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, INSERM, Paris, France.,Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nassif EF, Mlecnik B, Thibault C, Auvray M, Bruni D, Colau A, Compérat E, Bindea G, Catteau A, Fugon A, Boquet I, Martel M, Camparo P, Colin P, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Bennamoun M, Barthere X, D’acremont B, Lefevre M, Audenet F, Mejean A, Verkarre V, Oudard S, Galon J. The Immunoscore in Localized Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Clinical Significance for Pathologic Responses and Overall Survival. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030494. [PMID: 33525361 PMCID: PMC7865364 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The prognosis of localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer is poor and the prognostic and predictive biomarkers of the response to treatment are lacking. We retrospectively investigated the role of the Immunoscore in the neoadjuvant setting, where the Immunoscore is a standardized quantitative assay of lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment. We found it allowed for the stratification of patient prognoses and the prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Abstract (1) Background—The five-year overall survival (OS) of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy is around 50%. There is no validated biomarker to guide the treatment decision. We investigated whether the Immunoscore (IS) could predict the pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes. (2) Methods—This retrospective study evaluated the IS in 117 patients treated using neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized MIBC from six centers (France and Greece). Pre-treatment tumor samples were immunostained for CD3+ and CD8+ T cells and quantified to determine the IS. The results were associated with the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, time to recurrence (TTR), and OS. (3) Results—Low (IS-0), intermediate (IS-1–2), and high (IS-3–4) ISs were observed in 36.5, 43.7, and 19.8% of the cohort, respectively. IS was positively associated with a pathologic complete response (pCR; p-value = 0.0096). A high IS was found in 35.7% of patients with a pCR, whereas it was found in 11.3% of patients without a pCR. A low IS was observed in 48.4% of patients with no pCR and in 21.4% of patients with a pCR. Low-, intermediate-, and high-IS patients had five-year recurrence-free rates of 37.2%, 36.5%, and 72.6%, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, a high IS was associated with a prolonged TTR (high vs. low: p = 0.0134) and OS (high vs. low: p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions—This study showed the significant prognostic and predictive roles of IS regarding localized MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F. Nassif
- Oncology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, University of Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (E.F.N.); (C.T.); (M.A.)
| | - Bernhard Mlecnik
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, INSERM, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (B.M.); (D.B.); (G.B.); (J.G.)
- Inovarion, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Constance Thibault
- Oncology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, University of Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (E.F.N.); (C.T.); (M.A.)
| | - Marie Auvray
- Oncology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, University of Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (E.F.N.); (C.T.); (M.A.)
| | - Daniela Bruni
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, INSERM, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (B.M.); (D.B.); (G.B.); (J.G.)
| | - Alexandre Colau
- Urology Department, Diaconnesses Hospital, 75020 Paris, France;
| | - Eva Compérat
- Pathology Department, Diaconnesses Hospital, 75012 Paris, France;
| | - Gabriela Bindea
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, INSERM, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (B.M.); (D.B.); (G.B.); (J.G.)
| | - Aurélie Catteau
- HalioDx, 13009 Marseille, France; (A.C.); (A.F.); (I.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Aurélie Fugon
- HalioDx, 13009 Marseille, France; (A.C.); (A.F.); (I.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Isabelle Boquet
- HalioDx, 13009 Marseille, France; (A.C.); (A.F.); (I.B.); (M.M.)
| | - Marine Martel
- HalioDx, 13009 Marseille, France; (A.C.); (A.F.); (I.B.); (M.M.)
| | | | - Pierre Colin
- Urology Department, La Louvière, 59042 Lille, France;
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Oncology Department, Alexandra Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece; (R.Z.); (A.B.)
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Oncology Department, Alexandra Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece; (R.Z.); (A.B.)
| | - Mostefa Bennamoun
- Oncology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France; (M.B.); (X.B.)
| | - Xavier Barthere
- Oncology Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France; (M.B.); (X.B.)
| | - Bruno D’acremont
- Urology Department, Clinique St Jean De Dieu, 75007 Paris, France;
| | - Marine Lefevre
- Department of Pathology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France;
| | - Francois Audenet
- Urology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP—Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (F.A.); (V.V.)
| | - Arnaud Mejean
- Pathology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France;
| | - Virginie Verkarre
- Urology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP—Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (F.A.); (V.V.)
| | - Stéphane Oudard
- Oncology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, University of Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (E.F.N.); (C.T.); (M.A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-156-093-447
| | - Jérôme Galon
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, INSERM, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France; (B.M.); (D.B.); (G.B.); (J.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nassif EF, Arsène-Henry A, Kirova YM. Brain metastases and treatment: multiplying cognitive toxicities. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:327-341. [PMID: 30755047 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1582336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Thirty per cent of cancer patients develop brain metastases, with multiple combination or sequential treatment modalities available, to treat systemic or central nervous system (CNS) disease. Most patients experience toxicities as a result of these treatments, of which cognitive impairment is one of the adverse events most commonly reported, causing major impairment of the patient's quality of life. Areas covered: This article reviews the role of cancer treatments in cognitive decline of patients with brain metastases: surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapies and hormone therapy. Pathological and molecular mechanisms, as well as future directions for limiting cognitive toxicities are also presented. Other causes of cognitive impairment in this population are discussed in order to refine the benefit-risk balance of each treatment modality. Expert opinion: Cumulative cognitive toxicity should be taken into account, and tailored to the patient's cognitive risk in the light of the expected survival benefit. Standardization of cognitive assessment in this context is needed in order to better appreciate each treatment's responsibility in cognitive impairment, keeping in mind disease itself impacts cognition in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F Nassif
- a Department of Radiotherapy , Institut Curie , Paris , France
| | | | - Youlia M Kirova
- a Department of Radiotherapy , Institut Curie , Paris , France
| |
Collapse
|