Efficacy and safety of GLS-010 (zimberelimab) in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A multicenter, single-arm, phase II study

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationship of Zimberelimab in Chinese Patients with Advanced Tumors

This study aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model using data from 2 clinical trials of zimberelimab, evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of zimberelimab, explore the feasibility of 360 mg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and 480 mg once every 4 weeks (Q4W) as alternative dosage regimens, and analyze the exposure-response relationship of the efficacy and safety of zimberelimab for advanced tumors. The PKs of zimberelimab were described using the 2-compartment model with time-dependent nonlinear elimination. The prediction-corrected visual predictive check was used to evaluate the model's predictive value on blood drug concentrations. In total, 2165 PK observations from 321 participants were included. The PopPK model demonstrated a high level of concordance between the observed data and the predicted values, indicative of a robust fit to the PK data of zimberelimab. The PK variables were similar for the 240 mg once every 2 weeks, 360 mg Q3W, and 480 mg Q4W regimens. No covariates significantly affecting the PK variables in the final model were found. The exposure variables of zimberelimab have no obvious correlations with efficacy and safety, and 360 mg Q3W and 480 mg Q4W are worthy of further study. This study establishes a PopPK model and analyzes the exposure-response relationship of zimberelimab, which helps to explore the potential for alternative dosing regimens and offers a foundation for optimizing therapeutic strategies for advanced cancer patients through simulation-based methods.

The role of autologous stem-cell transplantation in classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the modern era

Despite excellent cure rates with modern front-line regimens, up to 20% of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma will progress through front-line therapy or experience disease relapse. Worldwide, salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) is considered the standard of care for these patients and can cure approximately 50% of relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients in the second line. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 antibody drug conjugate, and PD1 inhibitors like nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have high response rates in patients who recur after HDT/ASCT. When used prior to HDT/ASCT, BV and PD1 inhibitors appear to dramatically increase the effectiveness of salvage therapies with complete response rates often double those seen with historic chemotherapy-based regimens and durable progression free survival (PFS) post-HDT/ASCT. Emerging data in adults and from pediatric trials showing a durable PFS in a subset of relapsed patients raises the question of whether HDT/ASCT is essential for cure in R/R patients after PD1 based salvage. Future studies will help clarify if ASCT can omitted PD1 based salvage to avoid the potential toxicity of HDT/ASCT without compromising cure.

Advances in Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment: From Molecular Biology to Clinical Practice

Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) is a highly curable disease, but around 20% of patients experience progression or relapse after standard frontline chemotherapy regimens. Salvage regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplants represent the historical treatment approach for these cases. In the last decade, with the increasing understanding of cHL biology and tumor microenvironment role in disease course, novel molecules have been introduced in clinical practice, improving outcomes in the relapsed/refractory setting. The anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugated brentuximab vedotin and PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors represent nowadays curative options for chemorefractory patients, and randomized trials recently demonstrated their efficacy in frontline immune-chemo-combined modalities. Several drugs able to modulate the patients' T-lymphocytes and NK cell activity are under development, as well as many anti-CD30 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell products. Multiple tumor aberrant epigenetic mechanisms are being investigated as targets for antineoplastic compounds such as histone deacetylase inhibitors and hypomethylating agents. Moreover, JAK2 inhibition combined with anti-PD1 blockade revealed a potential complementary therapeutic pathway in cHL. In this review, we will summarize recent findings on cHL biology and novel treatment options clinically available, as well as promising future perspectives in the field.

Case report: Long-term intracranial effect of zimberelimab monotherapy following surgical resection of high PD-L1-expressing brain metastases from NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounted for the majority of lung cancer cases worldwide. Brain metastases (BM) frequently complicate NSCLC and portend a dismal prognosis. To control neurological symptoms, surgical resection is commonly followed by brain radiotherapy (RT). However, RT is often complicated by neurotoxicity. For patients with tumors that harbor positive driver genes, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are considered the standard of care. Nevertheless, treatment options for those without driver gene mutations are still debated. Programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)/ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, as well as for those with asymptomatic BM. However, the effect of anti-PD-1 antibodies on active BM within such specific populations is undetermined. Herein we present a case of a 65-year-old patient with NSCLC and high PD-L1-expressing BM. The patient underwent surgical resection of BM followed by first-line monotherapy with 31 cycles of zimberelimab, a novel anti-PD-1 antibody, and has already achieved 24 months of progression-free survival and intracranial recurrence-free survival. To our knowledge, this is the first report regarding the intracranial effect of zimberelimab on BM from primary lung cancer. This case report might facilitate an understanding of the intracranial effects of different anti-PD-1 antibodies for such populations.

STAR-121: A Phase III Randomized Study of Domvanalimab and Zimberelimab in Combination With Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab With Chemotherapy in Untreated Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With No Actionable Gene Alterations

INTRODUCTION

Dual inhibition with a T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains plus programmed death (ligand)-1 (PD[L]-1) inhibitors, with or without chemotherapy, is an emerging therapeutic strategy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). The STAR-121 (NCT05502237) phase III, global, randomized, open-label study will investigate first-line domvanalimab (anti-TIGIT) and zimberelimab (anti-PD-1) plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in mNSCLC with no actionable gene alterations.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Approximately 720 participants (≥18 years old) with untreated mNSCLC and no EGFR and ALK mutations will be randomized into 3 groups (A, B, or C) in a 4:4:1 ratio and stratified by baseline PD-L1 expression (tumor cells <50% vs. ≥50%), histology (squamous vs. nonsquamous), and geographic region (East Asia vs. non-East Asia). Group A will receive domvanalimab 1200 mg plus zimberelimab 360 mg plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (PT), group B will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg plus PT, and group C will receive zimberelimab 360 mg plus PT, every 3 weeks. Treatment will be administered until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Dual primary endpoints are progression-free survival (by blinded independent central review [BICR]) and overall survival for group A versus B. Key secondary endpoints comprise overall response rate (by BICR), safety, and quality of life. Exploratory endpoints include efficacy and safety between groups A and C, pharmacokinetics, patient-reported outcomes, and biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

Enrollment in the STAR-121 study commenced on October 12, 2022, and is currently ongoing with completion planned by September 2024. The study completion is expected by December 2027.

Sacituzumab Govitecan in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer That Progressed After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3

PURPOSE

Pembrolizumab is standard therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progress after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, only approximately 21% of patients respond. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a trophoblast cell surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with US Food and Drug Administration-accelerated approval to treat patients with locally advanced or mUC who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). Here, we report the primary analysis of TROPHY-U-01 cohort 3.

METHODS

TROPHY-U-01 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label phase II study. Patients were CPI-naïve and had mUC progression after platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or ≤12 months in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Patients received 10 mg/kg of SG once on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg of pembrolizumab once on day 1 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per central review. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per central review, and safety.

RESULTS

Cohort 3 included 41 patients (median age 67 years; 83% male; 78% visceral metastases [29% liver]). With a median follow-up of 14.8 months, the ORR was 41% (95% CI, 26.3 to 57.9; 20% complete response rate), CBR was 46% (95% CI, 30.7 to 62.6), median DOR was 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.8 to not estimable [NE]), and median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 10.2). The median overall survival was 12.7 months (range, 10.7-NE). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61% of patients; most common were neutropenia (37%), leukopenia (20%), and diarrhea (20%).

CONCLUSION

SG plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a high response rate with an overall manageable toxicity profile in patients with mUC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. No new safety signals were detected. These data support further evaluation of SG plus CPI in mUC.

Exploring the regulatory mechanism of intestinal flora based on PD-1 receptor/ligand targeted cancer immunotherapy

Serving as a pivotal immunotherapeutic approach against tumors, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy amplifies the immune cells' capability to eliminate tumors by obstructing the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1. Research indicates that immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective when a patient's gut harbors unique beneficial bacteria. As such, it has further been revealed that the gut microbiome influences tumor development and the efficacy of cancer treatments, with metabolites produced by the microbiome playing a regulatory role in the antitumor efficacy of Immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICBs). This article discusses the mechanism of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and the role of intestinal flora in immune regulation. This review focuses on the modulation of intestinal flora in the context of PD-1 immunotherapy, which may offer a new avenue for combination therapy in tumor immunotherapy.

Characteristics of clinical trials of new oncology drugs approved in China

BACKGROUND

Since reforms were introduced to incentivize drug innovation in 2015, the Chinese pharmaceutical market has experienced unprecedented prosperity, with more new drugs than ever before, especially anticancer treatments. In 2021, Chinese regulatory agencies issued the new guideline for clinical research and development of antitumor drugs, triggering a series of responses on the drug market. Limited research has outlined the nature of the original new drugs in China to understand the dynamic response of the market.

METHODS

The objective of this article was to map the clinical development of approved new oncology drugs in China from 2015 to 2021 and differed from previous studies by focusing on original new drugs, using the United States as a benchmark, and elaborating the endogenous features of clinical trials.

RESULTS

Clinical trials conducted in China have risen to a level similar to that of the United States in many aspects of trial design, but there is still distance between the implementation and operational details of clinical trials. In the meantime, China has made significant breakthroughs in drug approval. Greater than 60% of novel anticancer drugs in China received accelerated approved for their first listing. Approximately 90% of the pivotal clinical trials supporting initial drug approval used surrogate measures as end points, and one half were nonrandomized or did not have a control group. However, duplicate development without evidence of a clinical advantage compared with current therapies was widely observed.

CONCLUSIONS

By presenting a multidimensional landscape of clinical trials and approvals in the real world, this review allows interested researchers, developers, and even regulators to understand what has been done and what should be done next in anticancer drug development in China.

Achilles' Heel of currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors: immune related adverse events

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the cancer treatment landscape by opening up novel avenues for intervention. As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has exponentially increased, so have immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The mechanism of irAEs may involve the direct damage caused by monoclonal antibodies and a sequence of immune responses triggered by T cell activation. Common side effects include dermatologic toxicity, endocrine toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and hepatic toxicity. While relatively rare, neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary toxicity can be fatal. These toxicities pose a clinical dilemma regarding treatment discontinuation since they can result in severe complications and necessitate frequent hospitalization. Vigilant monitoring of irAEs is vital in clinical practice, and the principal therapeutic strategy entails the administration of oral or intravenous glucocorticoids (GSCs). It may be necessary to temporarily or permanently discontinue the use of ICIs in severe cases. Given that irAEs can impact multiple organs and require diverse treatment approaches, the involvement of a multidisciplinary team of experts is imperative. This review aims to comprehensively examine the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, incidence, and treatment options for various irAEs.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective and available local treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, the value of hypofractionated RT in this setting has not been confirmed.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma who received hypofractionated RT between January 2020 and August 2022 at a single institution. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and acute side effects were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were included. The median dose for residual disease was 36 Gy, at a dose per fraction of 2.3-5 Gy. After RT, the ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 90% and 80%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 2-27 months), 10 patients (33.3%) experienced disease progression and three died. The 1-year OS and PFS rates for all patients were 81.8% and 66.3%, respectively. The majority (8/10) of post-RT progressions involved out-of-field relapses. Patients with relapsed diseases, no response to systemic therapy, multiple lesions at the time of RT, and no response to RT were associated with out-of-field relapses. PFS was associated with response to RT (P = 0.001) and numbers of residual sites (P < 0.001). No serious non-hematological adverse effects (≥ grade 3) associated with RT were reported.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that hypofractionated RT was effective and tolerable for patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma, especially for those that exhibited localized residual disease.

Whether specific genetic feature predicted immunotherapy efficacy: A case report

RATIONALE

Blockade of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1), have been observed to have quite good efficacy in recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer. Generally, we believe that the biomarkers of PD-1 inhibitors are programmed cell death-ligand 1, tumor mutational burden, high microsatellite instability, or deficient mismatch repair. However, in the case reported below, we observed that the patient with negative existing predictive biomarkers have significant benefits after zimberelimab monotherapy, indicating that there were other biomarkers that may predict immunotherapy efficacy. However, currently, no one has explored and studied the other potential biomarkers of PD-1 inhibitors.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 51-year-old patient, diagnosed with cervical adenocarcinoma nearly 11 years ago, requested treatment.

DIAGNOSES

The next-generation sequencing has shown PIK3CA E545K, SMAD4 1309-1G, and ALK E717K gene mutations, receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ErbB-2) amplification, microsatellite stability, and low tumor mutational burden of 6.3 mutations per megabase. And immunohistochemistry revealed that the tumor was programmed cell death-ligand 1 negative.

INTERVENTION

Zimberelimab monotherapy was accepted as third-line treatment.

OUTCOMES

The patient had received zimberelimab for nearly 10 months, the best tumor response was PR (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) and no noticeable adverse reactions were observed.

LESSONS

PIK3CA-E542K, ErbB2 amplification, and SMAD4 mutations could be potential biomarkers for PD-1 inhibitors, but a single instance is insufficient to validate the hypotheses. A larger number of patients or more clinical data will be necessary to determine whether these gene mutations are appropriate biomarkers for patients when treatment with PD-1 inhibitors.

Efficacy and safety of zimberelimab (GLS-010) monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study

OBJECTIVE

There is an unmet need to improve clinical outcomes for patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer. Checkpoint inhibitors represent a promising treatment strategy. We evaluated the safety and anti-tumor activity of zimberelimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody, in patients with previously treated, recurrent, metastatic cervical cancer.

METHODS

This phase II, single-arm, open-label study used a Simon two-stage minimax design. Eligible patients were women aged 18-75 years with programmed death ligand-1-positive recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer that had progressed after first- or subsequent-line chemotherapy (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1). Patients received intravenous zimberelimab (240 mg every 2 weeks) for 2 years until disease progression, intolerable adverse effects, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint was objective response rate assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, by an independent review committee.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were enrolled. Median age was 51 (range, 31-75) years; 63.8% had an ECOG performance status of 1. The median number of previous treatment lines was 1 (range, 1-4). Median follow-up was 16.9 (range, 16.3-18.4) months. The objective response rate was 27.6%, and the disease control rate was 55.2%. Median duration of response was not reached. Median overall survival was 16.8 months, and median progression-free survival was 3.7 months. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of any grade was 78.1%, of which the most common were hypothyroidism (26.7%) and anemia (19.0%).

CONCLUSION

Zimberelimab monotherapy demonstrated durable anti-tumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with cervical cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03972722.

Safety and efficacy of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been used in the treatment of relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R HL) recently. To further understand the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in R/R HL, we conducted this meta-analysis.

METHODS

Databases and the Clinical Registration Platforms have been systematically searched for related studies by March 2022. For safety analysis, the incidence and exhibition of any grade and grade 3 or higher adverse effects (AEs) were evaluated. Besides, severe AEs (SAEs), treatment-related deaths, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were summarized. The overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, partial response (PR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DOR) were calculated for efficacy analysis. All processes were implemented mainly through the package Meta and MetaSurv of software R 4.1.2.

RESULTS

Overall 20 studies and 1440 patients were enrolled. The pooled incidence of any grade and grade 3 or higher AEs were 92% and 26%, respectively. The pooled ORR, CR rate and PR rate were 79%, 44% and 34%, respectively. The most common AEs were neuropathy (29%), nausea (27%), pyrexia (26%), and leukopenia (25%), and the most common grade 3 or higher AEs included leukopenia (10%), infusion reaction (8%), weight gain (3%), and neutropenia (2.7%). In survival analysis, pembrolizumab monotherapy appeared to perform better compared to nivolumab monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors show promising efficacy and tolerable AEs in the treatment of R/R HL.

The role and participation of immune cells in the endometrial tumor microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment is surrounded by blood vessels and consists of malignant, non-malignant, and immune cells, as well as signalling molecules, which primarily affect the therapeutic response and curative effects of drugs in clinical studies. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells participate in tumor progression, impact anticancer therapy, and eventually lead to the development of immune tolerance. Immunotherapy is evolving as a promising therapeutic intervention to stimulate and activate the immune system to suppress cancer cell growth. Endometrial cancer (EC) is an immunogenic disease, and in recent years, immunotherapy has shown benefit in the treatment of recurrent and advanced EC. This review discusses the key molecular pathways associated with the intra-tumoral immune response and the involvement of circulatory signalling molecules. Specific immunologic signatures in EC which offer targets for immunomodulating agents, are also discussed. We have summarized the available literature in support of using immunotherapy in EC. Lastly, we have also discussed ongoing clinical trials that may offer additional promising immunotherapy options in the future. The manuscript also explored innovative approaches for screening and identifying effective drugs, and to reduce the financial burdens for the development of personalized treatment strategies. Collectively, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the role of immune cells and the tumor microenvironment in the development, progression, and treatment of EC.

Hot and cold tumors: Immunological features and the therapeutic strategies

The "hotness" or "coldness" of the tumors are determined by the information of the cancer cells themselves, tumor immune characteristics, tumor microenvironment, and signaling mechanisms, which are key factors affecting cancer patients' clinical efficacy. The switch mechanism of "hotness" and "coldness" and its corresponding pathological characteristics and treatment strategies are the frontier and hot spot of tumor treatment. How to distinguish the "hotness" or "coldness" effectively and clarify the causes, microenvironment state, and characteristics are very important for the tumor response and efficacy treatments. Starting from the concept of hot and cold tumor, this review systematically summarized the molecular characteristics, influencing factors, and therapeutic strategies of "hot and cold tumors," and analyzed the immunophenotypes, the tumor microenvironment, the signaling pathways, and the molecular markers that contribute to "hot and cold tumors" in details. Different therapeutic strategies for "cold and hot tumors" based on clinical efficacy were analyzed with drug targets and proteins for "cold and hot tumors." Furthermore, this review combines the therapeutic strategies of different "hot and cold tumors" with traditional medicine and modern medicine, to provide a basis and guidance for clinical decision-making of cancer treatment.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | From Biology to Therapy: Progress in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a unique lymphoid malignancy where the malignant cells comprise only 1% to 2% of the total tumor cellularity. Over the past 2 decades, the treatment of HL has evolved drastically based on the advent of novel targeted therapies. Novel agents including programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates such as brentuximab vedotin, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have served to shape the management of HL in the frontline as well as the relapsed and refractory (R/R) setting. Some of these agents have been incorporated into treatment algorithms, while others are currently under investigation demonstrating promising results. This review focuses on highlighting the underlying tumor biology forming the basis of therapeutics in HL, and reviews some of the emerging and established novel therapies.

Long-term survival benefit of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapies have shown a favorable efficacy and good tolerance for relapsed or refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, there are limited data on long-term outcomes among patients with r/r cHL who achieve an objective response to anti-PD-1 therapies. A total of 260 responders from four, phase 2 clinical trials were included in this study. The median age was 32 years with a male/female ratio of 1.3:1. After a median follow-up period of 31.1 months, 116 (44.6%) responders experienced disease progression and 18 (6.9%) died. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 55.1% and 89.7% overall. Patients with partial remission (PR) had inferior outcomes compared with those who achieved complete remission (3-year PFS, 29.5% vs. 72.3%, P < 0.001; 3-year OS, 81.5% vs. 94.4%, P = 0.017). Moreover, the survival outcome was inferior for patients with refractory disease compared with those with relapsed disease. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed PR and refractory disease were independent risk factors for PFS. In conclusion, PR and refractory disease have a negative impact on the survival benefit of anti-PD-1 therapeutics in patients with r/r cHL, which highlights the need for multimodal treatment strategies.

Zimberelimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is a rare cancer with a poor prognosis at advanced stage, and the standard first-line treatment for inoperable patients is chemotherapy. Although combining programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors with chemotherapy is generally considered safe and effective in several malignant solid tumors, there are few reports regarding initial immunochemotherapy in advanced MPeM.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, to our knowledge, we present the first case of a patient with epithelioid subtype MPeM, who was treatment-naïve and benefited from initial PD-1 inhibitor plus standard chemotherapy with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and good tolerance. A 49-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for a persistent burning sensation in the abdomen. Computed tomography revealed a solid mass in the lower abdomen, which was subsequently diagnosed histologically as epithelioid subtype MPeM by core needle biopsy. The patient received eight cycles of pemetrexed 800 mg (day 1), cisplatin 60/50 mg (day 1–2), and zimberelimab (PD-1 inhibitor) 240 mg (day 1) every 3 wk. He achieved significant reduction of peritoneal tumors with remarkable improvement in symptoms. The best tumor response was partial remission with a final PFS of 7 mo. No immune-related adverse event occurred during the combination treatment.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of the present case demonstrates the promising anti-tumor activity of immunochemotherapy to treat inoperable MPeM in the future.

Zimberelimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is a rare cancer with a poor prognosis at advanced stage, and the standard first-line treatment for inoperable patients is chemotherapy. Although combining programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors with chemotherapy is generally considered safe and effective in several malignant solid tumors, there are few reports regarding initial immunochemotherapy in advanced MPeM.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, to our knowledge, we present the first case of a patient with epithelioid subtype MPeM, who was treatment-naïve and benefited from initial PD-1 inhibitor plus standard chemotherapy with a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and good tolerance. A 49-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for a persistent burning sensation in the abdomen. Computed tomography revealed a solid mass in the lower abdomen, which was subsequently diagnosed histologically as epithelioid subtype MPeM by core needle biopsy. The patient received eight cycles of pemetrexed 800 mg (day 1), cisplatin 60/50 mg (day 1-2), and zimberelimab (PD-1 inhibitor) 240 mg (day 1) every 3 wk. He achieved significant reduction of peritoneal tumors with remarkable improvement in symptoms. The best tumor response was partial remission with a final PFS of 7 mo. No immune-related adverse event occurred during the combination treatment.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of the present case demonstrates the promising anti-tumor activity of immunochemotherapy to treat inoperable MPeM in the future.

Combination therapy with antibody‑drug conjugate RC48 (disitamab vedotin) and zimberelimab (PD‑1 inhibitor) successfully controlled recurrent HER2‑positive breast cancer resistant to trastuzumab emtansine: A case report

Options for later-line therapy are limited for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer who have exhibited resistance to several systemic treatments. Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors are novel approaches for HER2-positive breast cancer, but few reports have been published regarding the efficacy of their combinations, particularly in patients with prior ADC failure. The present report describes a case of recurrent metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer, which responded poorly to several perioperative systemic therapies, including chemotherapies, HER2-targeted antibodies, small molecule inhibitors and trastuzumab emtansine (an ADC), along with post-surgical radiotherapy. Following failure of front-line therapies for recurrent cancer located in the chest wall, combination treatment with another HER2-targeted ADC, disitamab vedotin (120 mg), and zimberelimab (240 mg), a fully humanized anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody, administered intravenously every 2 weeks, was initiated. The tumor lesions improved slightly after two cycles of treatment and shrunk markedly, and almost disappeared at the end of the sixth cycle of therapy. The patient is still in remission at present. The present findings suggest the potential efficacy of HER2-targeted ADCs combined with PD-1 inhibitors for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, including those resistant to prior HER2-targeted ADCs.

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Biomarkers of Response in Lymphoma: A Narrative Review

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized the prognosis of several advanced-stage solid tumors. However, its success has been far more limited in hematological malignancies and is mostly restricted to classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL). In patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), response to PD-1/PD-L1 ICB monotherapy has been relatively limited, although some subtypes are more sensitive than others. Numerous predictive biomarkers have been investigated in solid malignancies, such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI), among others. This review aims to appraise the current knowledge on PD-1/PD-L1 ICB efficacy in lymphoma when used either as monotherapy or combined with other agents, and describes potential biomarkers of response in this specific setting.

Advances in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a group of drugs designed to improve the therapeutic effects on various types of malignant tumors. Irrespective of monotherapy or combinational therapies as first-line and later-line therapy, ICIs have achieved benefits for various tumors. Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) / ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immune checkpoint that suppresses antitumor immunity, especially in the tumor microenvironment (TME). PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors block tumor-related downregulation of the immune system, thereby enhancing antitumor immunity. In comparison with traditional small-molecule drugs, ICIs exhibit pharmacokinetic characteristics owing to their high molecular weight. Furthermore, different types of ICIs exhibit different pharmacodynamic characteristics. Hence, ICIs have been approved for different indications by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). This review summarizes pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of PD-1/ PD-L1 inhibitors to provide a reference for rational clinical application.

Advances in the structural characterization of complexes of therapeutic antibodies with PD-1 or PD-L1

Antibody-based immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based therapeutics have become effective clinical applications for cancers. Applications of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to de-activate the PD-1-PD-L1 pathway could effectively reverse the phenotype of depleted activated thymocytes (T cells) to recover their anti-tumoral activities. High-resolution structures of the complexes of the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies with PD-1 or PD-L1 have revealed the key inter-molecular interactions and provided valuable insights into the fundamental mechanisms by which these antibodies inhibit PD-L1-PD-1 binding. Each anti-PD-1 mAb exhibits a unique blockade mechanism, such as interference with large PD-1-PD-L1 contacting interfaces, steric hindrance by overlapping a small area of this site, or binding to an N-glycosylated site. In contrast, all therapeutic anti-PD-L1 mAbs bind to a similar area of PD-L1. Here, we summarized advances in the structural characterization of the complexes of commercial mAbs that target PD-1 or PD-L1. In particular, we focus on the unique characteristics of those mAb structures, epitopes, and blockade mechanisms. It is well known that the use of antibodies as anti-tumor drugs has increased recently and both PD-1 and PD-L1 have attracted substantial attention as target for antibodies derived from new technologies. By focusing on structural characterization, this review aims to aid the development of novel antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 in the future.

Advances in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma: Current and future approaches

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a rare type of lymphoma with unique histologic, immunophenotypic, and clinical features. It represents approximately one-tenth of lymphomas diagnosed in the United States and consists of two subtypes: classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL), which accounts for majority of HL cases, and nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma represent approximately 5% of Hodgkin lymphoma cases. From this point, we will be focusing on cHL in this review. In general, it is considered a highly curable disease with first-line chemotherapy with or without the addition of radiotherapy. However, there are patients with disease that relapses or fails to respond to frontline regimens and the standard treatment modality for chemo sensitive cHL is high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). In recent years, targeted immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cHL while many novel agents are being explored in addition to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy which is also being investigated in clinical trials as a potential treatment option.

Novel Agents For Relapsed and Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Review

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is the most common type of HL that occurs mainly in people aged between 15–30 and over 55 years. Although its general prognosis is favorable, 10%–30% of patients with cHL will ultimately develop relapsed or refractory disease (r/r cHL). Improving the cure rate of r/r cHL has proven to be challenging. Some novel agents, such as brentuximab vedotin and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have been used in conventional regimens for patients with r/r cHL in the past decade, have been shown to have good curative effects. This paper reviews the conventional regimens for patients with r/r cHL and focuses on the newest clinical trials and treatment measures to prolong prognosis and reduce adverse events. The evaluation of prognosis plays a vital role in analyzing the risk of relapse or disease progression; thus, finding new predictive strategies may help treat patients with r/r cHL more efficaciously.

Generation, secretion and degradation of cancer immunotherapy target PD-L1

Cancer immunotherapy is a rapidly developing and effective method for the treatment of a variety of malignancies in recent years. As a significant immune checkpoint, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its receptor programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) play the most significant role in cancer immune escape and cancer immunotherapy. Though PD-L1 have become an important target for drug development and there have been various approved drugs and clinic trials targeting it, and various clinical response rate and adverse reactions prevent many patients from benefiting from it. In recent years, combination trials have become the main direction of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies development. Here, we summarized PD-L1 biofunctions and key roles in various cancers along with the development of PD-L1 inhibitors. The regulators that are involved in controlling PD-L1 expression including post-translational modification, mRNA level regulation as well as degradation and exosome secretory pathway of PD-L1 were focused. This systematic summary may provide comprehensive understanding of different regulations on PD-L1 as well as a broad prospect for the search of the important regulator of PD-L1. The regulatory factors of PD-L1 can be potential targets for immunotherapy and increase strategies of immunotherapy in combination.

Antibodies to watch in 2022

In this 13th annual installment of the annual 'Antibodies to Watch' article series, we discuss key events in commercial antibody therapeutics development that occurred in 2021 and forecast events that might occur in 2022. Regulatory review of antibody therapeutics that target the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus proceeded at an unprecedented pace in 2021, resulting in both emergency use authorizations and full approvals for sotrovimab, regdanvimab, REGEN-COV2, as well as others, in numerous countries. As of November 1, a total of 11 antibody therapeutics had been granted first approvals in either the United States or European Union in 2021 (evinacumab, dostarlimab loncastuximab tesirine, amivantamab, aducanumab, tralokinumab, anifrolumab, bimekizumab, tisotumab vedotin, regdanvimab, REGEN-COV2). The first global approvals of seven products, however, were granted elsewhere, including Japan (pabinafusp alfa), China (disitamab vedotin, penpulimab, zimberelimab), Australia (sotrovimab, REGEN-COV2), or the Republic of Korea (regdanvimab). Globally, at least 27 novel antibody therapeutics are undergoing review by regulatory agencies. First actions by the Food and Drug Administration on the biologics license applications for faricimab, sutimlimab, tebentafusp, relatlimab, sintilimab, ublituximab and tezepelumab are expected in the first quarter of 2022. Finally, our data show that, with antibodies for COVID-19 excluded, the late-stage commercial clinical pipeline of antibody therapeutics grew by over 30% in the past year. Of those in late-stage development, marketing applications for at least 22 may occur by the end of 2022.

Zimberelimab: First Approval

Zimberelimab (^®) is an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody being developed by Gloria Biosciences, Arcus Biosciences and Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. for the treatment of various cancers including cervical cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. Based on the results of a phase II trial, zimberelimab was recently approved for marketing in China as treatment for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of zimberelimab leading to this first approval.