6.7 Mb interstitial duplication in chromosome band 11q24.2q25 associated with infertility, minor dysmorphic features and normal psychomotor development

Prenatal diagnosis and genetic analysis of small supernumerary marker chromosomes in the eastern chinese han population: A retrospective study of 36 cases

BACKGROUND

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) are additional chromosomes with unclear structures and origins, and their correlations with clinical fetal phenotypes remain incompletely understood, which reduces the accuracy of genetic counseling.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 36 cases of sSMCs diagnosed in our center. We performed G-banding and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). The resulting karyotypes were compared with case reports in the literature and various databases including OMIM, DECIPHER, ClinVar, ClinGen, ISCA, DGV, and PubMed.

RESULTS

Karyotype analysis data revealed that 19 out of 36 fetuses were mosaic. Copy number variants (CNVs) analysis results showed that 27 out of 36 fetuses harbored pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. Among these 27 cases, 11 fetuses carried sex chromosome-related CNVs, including 4 female cases exhibiting Turner syndrome phenotypes and 7 cases showing Y chromosome deletions. In the remaining 16 fetuses with autosomal CNVs, 9 fetuses carried variants associated with Cat eye syndrome, Emanuel syndrome, Tetrasomy 18p, and 15q11-q13 duplication syndrome. Among these, 22 fetuses were terminated, and the remaining 5 fetuses were delivered and developed normally. Additionally, we identified a few variants with unclear pathogenicity.

CONCLUSION

Cytogenetic analysis is essential for identifying the pathogenicity of sSMCs and increasing the accuracy of genetic counseling.

A clinical and molecular analysis of a patient with Emanuel syndrome

Emanuel syndrome (ES) is the most frequent type of recurrent non‑Robertsonian translocation that is characterized by numerous anomalies. Over 100 patients with ES have been described in the literature. The phenotype of this syndrome varies but often consists of facial dysmorphism, microcephaly, severe intellectual disability, developmental retardation, congenital heart disease and genital anomalies. The present study describes a 2‑year‑old boy with multiple malformations, including facial dysmorphism, severe intellectual disability, growth retardation, congenital heart disease, cleft lip and palate, genital malformation (micropenis), amblyopia, thymic dysplasia and hearing impairment. The karyotype of the patient was 47,XY,+del(22)(q13), and the maternal karyotype was 46,XX,t(11;22)(q25;q13),9qh‑,15p+. Single‑nucleotide polymorphism‑array analysis of the proband indicated a partial duplication of chromosomes 22 and 11 at 22q11.1‑q11.21 and 11q23.3‑q25, respectively, which confirmed the diagnosis of ES. To date, no cases of ES have been reported in mainland China. The present case further emphasizes the necessity and importance of high‑resolution techniques for genetic diagnosis and for subsequent genetic counseling. The present study contributed to the phenotypic delineation of ES and confirmed the first ES patient in mainland China.

Copy number variants in association with type 1 collagenopathy: Atypical osteogenesis imperfecta

We report a sibling-pair and a 4-year old child from two families with an atypical presentation in Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). In the sib-pair, the older sibling initially came to medical attention due to a fracture history (Patient 1) and she was shown to have a COL1A2 mutation. In addition, she also had developmental delay, facial dysmorphism, and a history of frequent infections which led to a search for an alternate diagnosis. ArrayCGH revealed a 4.3 Mb duplication on chromosome 19q13.42q13.43, which was confirmed by FISH analysis. On further familial analysis, the younger sibling who had no previous fracture history was also found to have the COL1A2 mutation and tested positive for the 19q13.42q13.43 duplication (Patient 2). The 19q13 duplication appears to be the cause of intellectual disability in these siblings but given that this is a chromosomal duplication, it is still possible that there is an as yet unidentified cause that may account for the combined phenotype in this family. Patient 3 was a 4-year old child presenting with a femoral fracture, blue sclerae, developmental delay, and joint hypermobility. Genetic analyses confirmed a COL1A2 mutation but also revealed an 8.8 Mb deletion of 11q24.2q25, confirmed by G-band chromosome analysis. We discuss the differing phenotypes in patients presenting with atypical OI and stress the need to consider ancillary investigations in individuals presenting with heterogeneous phenotypic symptoms, not entirely attributable to OI.

Partial trisomy of 11q23.3-q25 inherited from a maternal low-level mosaic unbalanced translocation

Partial trisomy of 11q is characterized by pre/postnatal growth retardation, microcephaly, dysmorphic craniofacial features, cognitive disability, abnormal muscle tone, inguinal hernia, and possible congenital heart defects. Here, we describe a 17-year-old male with a 17.77 Mb-sized [arr 11q23.3-q25 (116,667,559 -134,434,130) ×3] partial trisomy resulting from the unbalanced translocation between chromosomes 11 and 22. The terminal translocation was detected using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmation. The partial trisomy was inherited from his mother who had the low-level (22.7%) mosaic unbalanced translocation and a normal phenotype. The patient showed most of the common features of partial trisomy 11q syndrome, with additional findings, including mesenteric fibromatosis.

Molekulare Karyotypisierung in der Diagnostik neurokognitiver Entwicklungsstörungen

Die Ursache neurokognitiver Entwicklungsstörungen mit Intelligenzminderung stellt eine der häufigsten Fragestellungen in der genetischen Sprechstunde dar. Obwohl mehr als 400 krankheitsverursachende Einzelgendefekte bekannt sind, machen Chromosomenaberrationen derzeit den größten Anteil der bekannten Ursachen aus. Mittels hochauflösender Array-Techniken lassen sich nach Ausschluss des Down-Syndroms bei unselektionierten Patienten in 18% der Fälle relevante chromosomale Imbalancen nachweisen, wobei die Aberrationen nur in 4% der Fälle auch primär mikroskopisch sichtbar wären. Mit zunehmender Auflösung steigt jedoch auch die Rate an detektierten Kopienzahl-Normvarianten, welche die Beurteilung der Befunde erschweren können. Indikatoren für krankheitsrelevante Aberrationen sind Aberrationsgröße, Gengehalt und Segregation innerhalb der Familie. Eine Kausalität kann letztlich aber nur dann belegt werden, wenn Vergleichsfälle mit ähnlichem Genotyp und Phänotyp vorliegen.

Emerging evidence for the role of genomic instability in male factor infertility

Male infertility is a common and complex pathology affecting about 7% of men of reproductive age. Given its complexity, the underlying etiology for male infertility is often unknown. A growing amount of evidence suggests genomic instability may be an important factor in some cases of male factor infertility. While some specific manifestations of genomic instability, such as increased sperm aneuploidy rates and increased somatic translocations and inversions in infertile men, are well established, other facets of genomic instability associated with male infertility have not been thoroughly investigated. A limited body of recent work has identified a potential association between microsatellite instability and spermatogenic failure. In addition, mutations in mismatch repair and tumor suppressor genes, which could potentially lead to genomic instability, have been identified in some infertile men and animal models. In addition, results of two epidemiologic studies suggest spermatogenic defects might be just one aspect of a more systemic problem, possibly due to increased genomic instability. In this review we discuss well-established links between genomic instability and male infertility, as well as some of the emerging but less established data to support this relationship. We also propose some important areas of future research toward a more complete understanding of the underlying mechanisms for male infertility.

Molekulare Karyotypisierung in der klinischen Diagnostik

Molekulare Karyotypisierung bezeichnet die genomweite Analyse bezüglich genetischer Kopienzahlveränderungen mit Hilfe von Arrays, welche das Genom mehr oder weniger dicht mit molekularen Markern abdecken. Die Hauptanwendung in der klinischen Diagnostik liegt derzeit bei der Analyse von Patienten mit geistiger Behinderung und multiplen Anomalien unbekannter Ursache. Bei ihnen lassen sich nach Ausschluss von konventionell-zytogenetisch sichtbaren Aberrationen, kryptischen subtelomerischen Aberrationen und klinisch gut erkennbaren, häufigen Mikrodeletionssyndromen in rund 10% der Fälle mittels molekularer Karyotypisierung chromosomale Mikroaberrationen nachweisen. Hierdurch konnten in den letzten Jahren zahlreiche neue Mikrodeletions- und -duplikationssyndrome charakterisiert werden, jedoch wurde auch ersichtlich, dass die Interpretation von Einzelbefunden aufgrund der großen Anzahl an genomischen Kopienzahlpolymorphismen nicht trivial ist.