Clinical and genetic findings in Hungarian pediatric patients carrying chromosome 16p copy number variants and a review of the literature

Molecular Genetic and Clinical Characteristics of Fetuses With Chromosome 16 Short-Arm Microdeletions/Microduplications

BACKGROUND

The short arm of chromosome 16 is highly susceptible to homologous recombination through nonallelic genes. This results in microdeletions/microduplications that can lead to neurodevelopmental disorders. However, incomplete penetrance and phenotypic diversity after birth exacerbate the uncertainty in prenatal genetic counseling.

METHODS

A total of 24,000 cases with prenatal diagnoses were retrospectively analyzed. Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) was performed on 17,000 cases, of which 81 (0.48%) had chromosome 16 short-arm microdeletions/microduplications.

RESULTS

Of the 81 fetuses with chromosome 16 short-arm microdeletions/microduplications, 36 and 28 had 16p11.2 and 16p13.11 microdeletions/microduplications, respectively. Ten, four, and three fetuses had 16p12.2, 16p13.12p13.11, and 16p13.12p1.3 microdeletions, respectively. Among the 36 fetuses with 16p11.2 microdeletions/microduplications, 33 had abnormal intrauterine ultrasound phenotypes, the most common being skeletal system abnormalities. Among the 28 fetuses with 16p13.11 microdeletions/microduplications, 19 had abnormal intrauterine ultrasound phenotypes, including 15 with abnormal ultrasonic soft markers. Among the 10 fetuses with the 16p12.2 microdeletions, six had abnormal ultrasound findings, and four had skeletal system abnormalities. After genetic counseling, 44 patients were selected and tested for family verification, of which 22 were de novo, while 22 were inherited from phenotypically normal parents. Among the 47 live births, 39 had no abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

All fetuses with the 16p13.11 microdeletions/microduplications, and 16p12.2, 16p13.12p13.11, and 16p13.12p1.3 microdeletions were healthy after birth. Hence, chromosome 16 short-arm microdeletions/microduplications should not be the sole basis for abandoning pregnancy, and clinicians should consider prenatal diagnostic data to maximize diagnostic accuracy.

What Can Really Be Considered a Syndrome? An Insight Based on 16p11.2 Microduplication

What is the definition of Syndrome? Since the beginning of studies in genetics, certain terminologies have been created and used to define groups of diseases or alterations. With the advancement of knowledge and the emergence of new technologies, the use of basic concepts is being done in a mistaken or often confusing way. Because of this, revisiting and readjusting the old terms becomes imminent. Here, we explore these concepts and their use, through a literature compilation of an already well-defined genetic alteration (16q11.2 microduplication). We bring comparisons in clinical and molecular scope of the alteration itself and its diagnostic methods, to improve the report of cases, rescuing terminologies and their applicability nowadays.

16p11.2 Microduplication Syndrome with Increased Fluid in the Cisterna: Coincidence or Phenotype Extension?

We report the first case of a child with 16p11.2 microduplication syndrome with increased fluid in the cisterna magna seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This finding may correspond to a Blake's Pouch Cyst (BPC) or a Mega Cisterna Magna (MCM), being impossible to differentiate through image examination. The molecular duplication was diagnosed using chromosomal microarray analysis with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). We review the clinical and neuroimaging features in published case reports in order to observe the findings described in the literature so far and present a skull three-dimensional model to contribute to a better understanding. Despite the variable expressivity of the syndrome being well known, there is no case described in the available literature that mentions the association of 16p11.2 microduplication and the presence of BPC or MCM seen in neuroimaging exams. This finding may represent an extension of the phenotype not yet reported or may present itself as a coincidence in a child with various malformations.

Recent Developments in Autism Genetic Research: A Scientometric Review from 2018 to 2022

Genetic research in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has progressed tremendously in recent decades. Dozens of genetic loci and hundreds of alterations in the genetic sequence, expression, epigenetic transformation, and interactions with other physiological and environmental systems have been found to increase the likelihood of developing ASD. There is therefore a need to represent this wide-ranging yet voluminous body of literature in a systematic manner so that this information can be synthesised and understood at a macro level. Therefore, this study made use of scientometric methods, particularly document co-citation analysis (DCA), to systematically review literature on ASD genetic research from 2018 to 2022. A total of 14,818 articles were extracted from Scopus and analyzed with CiteSpace. An optimized DCA analysis revealed that recent literature on ASD genetic research can be broadly organised into 12 major clusters representing various sub-topics. These clusters are briefly described in the manuscript and potential applications of this study are discussed.

Prenatal Diagnosis of True Fetal Mosaicism with Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosome Derived from Chromosome 16 by Funipuncture and Molecular Cytogenetics Including Chromosome Microarray

This study examined the molecular characterization of a prenatal case with true fetal mosaicism of small supernumerary marker chromosome 16 (sSMC(16)). A 41-year-old female underwent amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation due to advanced maternal age. Chromosomal analysis for cultured amniocytes revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+mar[4]/46,XY[16]. Spectral karyotyping and metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated that the sSMC was derived from chromosome 16 (47,XY,+mar.ish der(16)(D16Z1+)[13/20]). Confined placental mosaicism was initially suspected because the prenatal ultrasound revealed a normal structure and the pregnancy was uneventful. However, interphase FISH of cord blood performed at 28 weeks of gestation showed 20% mosaicism of trisomy chromosome 16 (nuc ish(D16Z2×3)[40/200]). Chromosome microarray analysis further demonstrated 55% mosaicism of an 8.02 Mb segmental duplication at the subcentromeric region of 16p12.1p11.1 (arr[GRCh37] 16p12.1p11.1(27021975_35045499)×3[0.55]). The results demonstrated a true fetal mosaicism of sSMC(16) involving chromosome16p12.1p11.1 that is associated with chromosome 16p11.2 duplication syndrome (OMIM #614671). After non-directive genetic counseling, the couple opted for late termination of pregnancy. This case illustrated the use of multiple molecular cytogenetic tools to elucidate the origin and structure of sSMC, which is crucial for prenatal counseling, decision making, and clinical management.