1
|
Romano C, Viola P, Craus M, Macchia G, Ferro M, Bonome P, Pierro A, Buwenge M, Arcelli A, Morganti AG, Deodato F, Cilla S. Feasibility-guided automated planning for stereotactic treatments of prostate cancer. Med Dosim 2023:S0958-3947(23)00020-1. [PMID: 36990847 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Significant improvements in plan quality using automated planning have been previously demonstrated. The aim of this study was to develop an optimal automated class solution for stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) planning of prostate cancer using the new Feasibility module implemented in the pinnacle evolution. Twelve patients were retrospectively enrolled in this planning study. Five plans were designed for each patient. Four plans were automatically generated using the 4 proposed templates for SBRT optimization implemented in the new pinnacle evolution treatment planning systems, differing for different settings of dose-fallout (low, medium, high and veryhigh). Based on the obtained results, the fifth plan (feas) was generated customizing the template with the optimal criteria obtained from the previous step and integrating in the template the "a-priori" knowledge of OARs sparing based on the Feasibility module, able to estimate the best possible dose-volume histograms of OARs before starting optimization. Prescribed dose was 35 Gy to the prostate in 5 fractions. All plans were generated with a full volumetric-modulated arc therapy arc and 6MV flattening filter-free beams, and optimized to ensure the same target coverage (95% of the prescription dose to 98% of the target). Plans were assessed according to dosimetric parameters and planning and delivery efficiency. Differences among the plans were evaluated using a Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance. The requests for more aggressive objectives for dose falloff parameters (from low to veryhigh) translated in a statistically significant improvement of dose conformity, but at the expense of a dose homogeneity. The best automated plans in terms of best trade-off between target coverage and OARs sparing among the 4 plans automatically generated by the SBRT module were the high plans. The veryhigh plans reported a significant increase of high-doses to prostate, rectum, and bladder that was considered dosimetrically and clinically unacceptable. The feas plans were optimized on the basis on high plans, reporting significant reduction of rectum irradiation; Dmean, and V18 decreased by 19% to 23% (p = 0.031) and 4% to 7% (p = 0.059), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in femoral heads and penile bulb irradiation for all dosimetric metrics. feas plans showed a significant increase of MU/Gy (mean: 368; p = 0.004), reflecting an increased level of fluence modulation. Thanks to the new efficient optimization engines implemented in pinnacle evolution (L-BFGS and layered graph), mean planning time was decreased to less than 10 minutes for all plans and all techniques. The integration of dose-volume histograms a-priori knowledge provided by the feasibility module in the automated planning process for SBRT planning has shown to significantly improve plan quality compared to generic protocol values as inputs.
Collapse
|
2
|
Siciarz P, McCurdy B, Hanumanthappa N, Van Uytven E. Adaptive radiation therapy strategies in the treatment of prostate cancer patients using hypofractionated VMAT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:7-26. [PMID: 34787360 PMCID: PMC8664140 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a comprehensive evaluation of eight adaptive radiation therapy strategies in the treatment of prostate cancer patients who underwent hypofractionated volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS The retrospective study included 20 prostate cancer patients treated with 40 Gy total dose over five fractions (8 Gy/fraction) using VMAT. Daily cone beam computed tomography images were acquired before the delivery of every fraction and then, with the application of deformable image registration used for the estimation of daily dose, contouring and plan re-optimization. Dosimetric benefits of the various ART strategies were quantified by the comparison of dose and dose-volume metrics derived from treatment planning objectives for original treatment plan and adapted plans with the consideration of target volumes (PTV and CTV) as well as critical structures (bladder, rectum, left, and right femoral heads). RESULTS Percentage difference (ΔD) between planning objectives and delivered dose in the D99% > 4000cGy (CTV) metric was -3.9% for the non-ART plan and 2.1% to 4.1% for ART plans. For D99% > 3800cGy and Dmax < 4280cGy (PTV), ΔD was -11.2% and -6.5% for the non-ART plan as well as -3.9% to -1.6% and -0.2% to 1.8% for ART plans, respectively. For D15% < 3200 cGy and D20% < 2800 cGy (bladder), ΔD was -62.4% and -68.8% for the non-ART plan as well as -60.0% to -57.4% and -67.0% to -64.0% for ART plans. For D15% < 3200 cGy and D20% < 2800 cGy (rectum), ΔD was -11.4% and -8.15% for non-ART plan as well as -14.9% to -9.0% and -11.8% to -5.1% for ART plans. CONCLUSIONS Daily on-line adaptation approaches were the most advantageous, although strategies adapting every other fraction were also impactful while reducing relative workload as well. Offline treatment adaptations were shown to be less beneficial due to increased dose delivered to bladder and rectum compared toother ART strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Siciarz
- Department of Medical PhysicsCancerCare ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
- Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Boyd McCurdy
- Department of Medical PhysicsCancerCare ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
- Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | | | - Eric Van Uytven
- Department of Medical PhysicsCancerCare ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Falco MD, Fusella M, Clemente S, Fiandra C, Gallio E, Garibaldi C, Bagalà P, Borzì G, Casale M, Casati M, Consorti R, Delana A, Esposito M, Malatesta T, Menghi E, Reggiori G, Russo S, Stasi M, Mancosu P. The influence of basic plan parameters on calculated small field output factors - A multicenter study. Phys Med 2021; 88:98-103. [PMID: 34217003 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The influence of basic plan parameters such as slice thickness, grid resolution, algorithm type and field size on calculated small field output factors (OFs) was evaluated in a multicentric study. METHODS AND MATERIALS Three computational homogeneous water phantoms with slice thicknesses (ST) 1, 2 and 3 mm were shared among twenty-one centers to calculate OFs for 1x1, 2x2 and 3x3 cm2 field sizes (FSs) (normalized to 10x10 cm2 FS), with their own treatment planning system (TPS) and the energy clinically used for stereotactic body radiation therapy delivery. OFs were calculated for each combination of grid resolution (GR) (1, 2 and 3 mm) and ST and finally compared with the OFs measured for the TPS commissioning. A multivariate analysis was performed to test the effect of basic plan parameters on calculated OFs. RESULTS A total of 509 data points were collected. Calculated OFs are slightly higher than measured ones. The multivariate analysis showed that Center, GR, algorithm type, and FS are predictive variables of the difference between calculated and measured OFs (p < 0.001). As FS decreases, the spread in the difference between calculated and measured OFs became larger when increasing the GR. Monte Carlo and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithms, presented a dependence on GR (p < 0.01), while Collapsed Cone Convolution and Acuros did not. The effect of the ST was found to be negligible. CONCLUSIONS Modern TPSs slightly overestimate the calculated small field OFs compared with measured ones. Grid resolution, algorithm, center number and field size influence the calculation of small field OFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Daniela Falco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "G. D'Annunzio" University, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marco Fusella
- Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, Padova, Italy
| | - Stefania Clemente
- Unit of Medical Physic and Radioprotection. Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Christian Fiandra
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Gallio
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristina Garibaldi
- IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Unit of Radiation Research, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Bagalà
- Universita' Campus Bio-medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Michelina Casale
- Struttura Semplice di Fisica Sanitaria Azienda Ospedaliera "Santa Maria" Terni, Italy
| | - Marta Casati
- MedicalPhysics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Rita Consorti
- Medical Physics Unit, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Delana
- Servizio di Fisica Sanitaria Ospedale S. Chiara A.P.S.S. Trento, Italy
| | - Marco Esposito
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Tiziana Malatesta
- Fisica Medica, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli S.Giovanni Calibita- Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Menghi
- Medical Physics Unit, Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" - IRST S.r.l.Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Meldola (FC), Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiation Oncology Dept., Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
| | - Serenella Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
| | - Michele Stasi
- Medical Physics Department, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiation Oncology Dept., Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mancosu P, Russo S, Antonucci AR, Stasi M. Lean Thinking to manage a national working group on physics aspects of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Med Phys 2021; 48:2050-2056. [PMID: 33598932 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report how the adoption of a Lean Thinking mindset in the management of a national working group (WG) on the physics of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) contributed to achieve SBRT standardization objectives. METHODS Vision for the WG has been established as fragmentation reduction and process harmonization enhancement in SBRT for Italian centers. Two main research themes of the technical aspects of SBRT emerged as areas with major standardization improvement needs, small field dosimetry and SBRT planning comparisons, to be investigated through multi-institutional studies. The management of the WG leveraged on the Lean concept of fostering self-organization in a non-hierarchical environment. Four progressive involvement levels were defined for each study. No specific "scientific" pre-experience was required to propose and coordinate a project, just requiring a voluntary commitment. People engagement was measured in terms of number of published articles. The standardization goals have been conducted through a simplified "5S" (Sort, Set in Order, Shine, Standardize, and Sustain) methodology, first considering a phase of awareness (the first three "S"), then identifying and implementing standardization actions (the last two "S"). RESULTS Since the beginning, 157 medical physicists joined the AIFM/SBRT-WG. Twenty-four papers/reviews/letters have been published in the period 2014-2019 on major radiation oncology journals, authored by >100 physicists (>50% working in small hospitals). Six over 12 first authors worked in peripheral/small hospitals, with no prior publication as first author. These studies contributed to the awareness and standardization phases for both small-field dosimetry and planning. In particular, errors in small-field measurements in 8% of centers were detected thanks to a generalized output factor curve in function of the effective field size created by averaging data available from different Linacs. Furthermore, planner's experience in SBRT was correlated with dosimetric parameters in the awareness phase; while sharing median dose volume histograms (DVHs) reduced variability among centers while keeping the same level of plan complexity. Finally, all the dosimetric parameters statistically significant to the planner experience during the awareness phase, were no longer significantly different in the standardization phase. CONCLUSIONS The experience of our SBRT-WG has shown how a Lean Thinking mindset could foster the SBRT procedure standardization and spread the physics of SBRT knowledge, enhancing personal growth. Our expectation is to inspire other scientific societies that have to deal with fragmented contexts or pursue processes harmonization through Lean principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit, Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Serenella Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Michele Stasi
- Medical Physics Department, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ruggieri R, Rigo M, Naccarato S, Gurrera D, Figlia V, Mazzola R, Ricchetti F, Nicosia L, Giaj-Levra N, Cuccia F, Vitale C, Stavreva N, Pressyanov DS, Stavrev P, Pellegrini R, Alongi F. Adaptive SBRT by 1.5 T MR-linac for prostate cancer: On the accuracy of dose delivery in view of the prolonged session time. Phys Med 2020; 80:34-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
|
6
|
Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Nicosia L, Giaj-Levra N, Figlia V, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Vitale C, Corradini S, Alongi F. Prostate re-irradiation: current concerns and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:947-956. [PMID: 32909471 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1822742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To date, the optimal management of locally relapsed prostate cancer patients after an initial course of radiotherapy remains a matter of debate. In recent years, local approaches have been proposed as a therapeutic option, which may potentially delay the initiation of hormone therapy. In the case of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), re-irradiation has been supported by growing evidence in the literature, mostly represented by extreme hypofractionated schedules delivered with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). AREAS COVERED We performed a systematic review of the literature using the PICO methodology to explore the available evidence regarding the use of EBRT in the setting of locally relapsed prostate cancer, both in terms of safety, tolerability and preliminary clinical outcomes. EXPERT OPINION Current literature data report the use of EBRT and particularly of SBRT for the safe and feasible re-treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer after an initial treatment course of radiotherapy. When extreme hypofractionation is adopted, only occasional grade ≥3 late adverse events are reported. Despite the current lack of high-level evidence and the short follow-up, preliminary clinical outcomes are promising and allow clinicians to hypothesize further prospective studies to evaluate SBRT as an alternative to the early initiation of androgen-deprivation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Vitale
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, University of Munich , Munich, Germany
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar , Verona, Italy.,University of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A national survey on technology and quality assurance for stereotactic body radiation therapy. Phys Med 2019; 65:6-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
|
8
|
Russo S, Masi L, Francescon P, Dicarolo P, De Martin E, Frassanito C, Redaelli I, Vigorito S, Stasi M, Mancosu P. Multi-site evaluation of the Razor stereotactic diode for CyberKnife small field relative dosimetry. Phys Med 2019; 65:40-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
9
|
Yedekci Y, Biltekin F, Ozyigit G. Feasibility study of an electronic portal imaging based in vivo dose verification system for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy. Phys Med 2019; 64:204-209. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
10
|
Villaggi E, Hernandez V, Fusella M, Moretti E, Russo S, Vaccara EML, Nardiello B, Esposito M, Saez J, Cilla S, Marino C, Stasi M, Mancosu P. Plan quality improvement by DVH sharing and planner's experience: Results of a SBRT multicentric planning study on prostate. Phys Med 2019; 62:73-82. [PMID: 31153401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate, in a multi-institutional context, the role of Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) sharing in order to achieve higher plan quality, to harmonize prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) plans and to assess if the planner's experience in SBRT could lead to lower dose at organs at risk (OARs). METHODS During the first phase five patients enrolled for prostate SBRT were planned by multiple physicists according to common protocol. The prescription dose was 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Dosimetric parameters, modulation index (MIt), plan parameters, and planner experience level (EL) were statistically analyzed. During the second phase median DVHs from all centers were shared and physicists replanned one patient of the five, aiming at inter-planner harmonization and further OARs sparing. Data were summarized by Spearman-correlogram (p < 0.05) and boxplots. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the re-plans to the original plans. RESULTS Seventy-eight SBRT plans from 13 centers were evaluated. EL correlated with modulation of plan parameters and reduction of OARs doses, such as volume receiving 28 Gy of rectum (rectum-V28Gy), rectum-V32Gy, and bladder-V30Gy. The re-plans showed significant reduced variability in rectum-V28Gy and increased PTV dose homogeneity. No significant difference in plan complexity metrics and plan parameters between plans and re-plans were obtained. CONCLUSIONS Planner's experience in prostate SBRT was correlated with dosimetric parameters. Sharing median DVHs reduced variability among centers whilst keeping the same level of plan complexity. SBRT planning skills can benefit from a replanning phase after sharing DVHs from multiple centers, improving plan quality and concordance among centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Villaggi
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Piacenza, Italy.
| | - Victor Hernandez
- Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Department of Medical Physics, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Marco Fusella
- Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Eugenia Moretti
- Department of Medical Physics, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Italy
| | - Serenella Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Firenze I-50012, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Esposito
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Firenze I-50012, Italy
| | - Jordi Saez
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Department of Radiation Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura "Giovanni Paolo II", Campobasso, Italy
| | | | - Michele Stasi
- Department of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiation Oncology Dept., Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dieterich S, Green O, Booth J. SBRT targets that move with respiration. Phys Med 2018; 56:19-24. [PMID: 30527085 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The technology of treating SBRT targets that move with respiration has undergone profound changes over the last 20 years. This review article summarizes modern image guidance to localize the target in real-time to account for intra-fraction motion. The state-of-the art respiratory motion compensation techniques will be discussed, including the determination and application of appropriate margins. This includes compression, gating and breath-hold, including the use of audiovisual feedback to manage motion. Approaches to real-time tracking include the use of hybrid external-internal imaging to build a skin-to-tumor correlation, which can then be tracked with a mobile robot (CyberKnife Synchrony, clinical since 2003) as well as the use of non-ionizing electromagnetic tumor surrogate localization followed by real-time tracking with a moving MLC (in clinical trials in Europe and Australia). Lastly, the clinical application of real-time MRI soft-tissue imaging to deliver adaptive, iso-toxic treatments will be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Olga Green
- Washington University St. Louis, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Talamonti C, Russo S, Pimpinella M, Falco MD, Cagni E, Pallotta S, Stasi M, Mancosu P. Community approach for reducing small field measurement errors: Experience over 24 centres. Radiother Oncol 2018; 132:218-222. [PMID: 30385173 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2018] [Revised: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The complexity of the modern Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) techniques requires comprehensive quality assurance programs, to ensure the right treatment to the patient. Dosimetry of small radiation fields is a challenge especially for radiotherapy centres starting to work on this issue. The matter to be discussed here concerns the need of detailed measurement procedures and cross checks to be paired to the usual recommendations on detectors and correction factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS The presented work involved 24 Italian radiotherapy centres, with the specific purpose to minimize systematic errors in output factor measurements over different radiotherapy centres. Using the unshielded silicon diode IBA Razor, reference curves for the relative signal ratio (RSR) as a function of beam size were created for each Linac family. RESULTS With this study we have demonstrated consistency of small field dosimetry on all the centres involved, moreover all radiotherapy centres using Razor are allowed to compare measurements amongst each other and centres with values deviating more than 5% from the reference curve are advised to repeat their measurements. With this procedure, some critical issues were detected from two centres in RSR measurements, that, if implemented into the own treatment planning system, would induce an unwanted overdosage larger than 5%. CONCLUSIONS The proposed approach could allow one to envision high-skilled therapy centres providing support to those featuring minor experience and could represent an important strategy for the clinical implementation of emerging technologies at high quality levels. The methodology adopted exploits crowd knowledge methods which could be applied in others areas of radiation dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Talamonti
- University of Florence, Dept Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Science, "Mario Serio", Medical Physics Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| | - Serenella Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Pimpinella
- Istituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti, ENEA-INMRI C R Casaccia, I-00123 Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Daniela Falco
- Department of Radiation Oncology "G. D'Annunzio", University of Chieti, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cagni
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Stefania Pallotta
- University of Florence, Dept Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Science, "Mario Serio", Medical Physics Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Stasi
- Medical Physics Department, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiation Oncology Dept., Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mancosu P, Nisbet A, Jornet N. Editorial: The role of medical physics in lung SBRT. Phys Med 2018; 45:205-206. [PMID: 29325801 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a standard treatment for non-operable patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this context, medical physics community has largely helped in the starting and the growth of this technique. In fact, SBRT requires the convergence of many different features for delivering large doses in few fractions to small moving target in an heterogeneous medium. The special issue of last month, was focused on the different physics challenges in lung SBRT. Eleven reviews were presented, covering: imaging for treatment planning and for treatment assessment; dosimetry and planning optimization; treatment delivery possibilities; image guidance during delivery; radiobiology. The current cutting edge role of medical physics was reported. We aimed to give a complete overview of different aspects of lung SBRT that would be of interest to both physicists implementing this technique in their institutions and more experienced physicists that would be inspired to start research projects in areas that still need further developments. We also feel that the role that medical physicists have played in the development and safe implementation of SBRT, particularly in lung region, can be taken as an excellent example to be translated to other areas, not only in Radiation Oncology but also in other health sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics service, Radiotherapy department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano-Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrew Nisbet
- Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, United Kingdom; Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Núria Jornet
- Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Giglioli FR, Clemente S, Esposito M, Fiandra C, Marino C, Russo S, Strigari L, Villaggi E, Stasi M, Mancosu P. Frontiers in planning optimization for lung SBRT. Phys Med 2017; 44:163-170. [PMID: 28566240 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.05.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Revised: 05/19/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging data are showing the safety and the efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy (SBRT) in lung cancer management. In this context, the very high doses delivered to the Planning Target Volume, make the planning phase essential for achieving high dose levels conformed to the shape of the target in order to have a good prognosis for tumor control and to avoid an overdose in relevant healthy adjacent tissue. In this non-systematic review we analyzed the technological and the physics aspects of SBRT planning for lung cancer. In particular, the aims of the study were: (i) to evaluate prescription strategies (homogeneous or inhomogeneous), (ii) to outline possible geometrical solutions by comparing the dosimetric results (iii) to describe the technological possibilities for a safe and effective treatment, (iv) to present the issues concerning radiobiological planning and the automation of the planning process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Christian Fiandra
- Dep. of Oncology Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Lidia Strigari
- Laboratory of Medical Physics and Expert Systems, Regina Elena National Cancer, Institute IFO, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Michele Stasi
- Medical Physics Dept., Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiotherapy Dept., Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dosimetric characterization of small fields using a plastic scintillator detector: A large multicenter study. Phys Med 2017; 41:33-38. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
16
|
Nakaguchi Y, Ono T, Maruyama M, Shimohigashi Y, Kai Y. Validation of a method for in vivo 3D dose reconstruction in SBRT using a new transmission detector. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:69-75. [PMID: 28574221 PMCID: PMC5874859 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) involves the delivery of substantially larger doses over fewer fractions than conventional therapy. Therefore, SBRT treatments will strongly benefit patients using vivo patient dose verification, because the impact of the fraction is large. For in vivo measurements, a commercially available quality assurance (QA) system is the COMPASS system (IBA Dosimetry, Germany). For measurements, the system uses a new transmission detector (Dolphin, IBA Dosimetry). In this study, we evaluated the method for in vivo 3D dose reconstruction for SBRT using this new transmission detector. We confirmed the accuracy of COMPASS with Dolphin for SBRT using multi leaf collimator (MLC) test patterns and clinical SBRT cases. We compared the results between the COMPASS, the treatment planning system, the Kodak EDR2 film, and the Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. MLC test patterns were set up to investigate various aspects of dose reconstruction for SBRT: (a) simple open fields (2 × 2–10 × 10 cm2), (b) a square wave chart pattern, and (c) the MLC position detectability test in which the MLCs were changed slightly. In clinical cases, we carried out 6 and 8 static IMRT beams for SBRT in the lung and liver. For MLC test patterns, the differences between COMPASS and MC were around 3%. The COMPASS with the dolphin system showed sufficient resolution in SBRT. For clinical cases, COMPASS can detect small changes for the dose profile and dose–volume histogram. COMPASS also showed good agreement with MC. We can confirm the feasibility of SBRT QA using the COMPASS system with Dolphin. This method was successfully operated using the new transmission detector and verified by measurements and MC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Nakaguchi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ono
- Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Masato Maruyama
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Yudai Kai
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Arumugam S, Sidhom M, Truant D, Xing A, Udovitch M, Holloway L. Variable angle stereo imaging for rapid patient position correction in an in-house real-time position monitoring system. Phys Med 2017; 33:170-178. [PMID: 28073637 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Revised: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 12/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and validate a variable angle stereo image based position correction methodology in an X-ray based in-house online position monitoring system. MATERIALS AND METHODS A stereo imaging module that enables 3D position determination and couch correction of the patient based on images acquired at any arbitrary angle and arbitrary angular separation was developed and incorporated to the in-house SeedTracker real-time position monitoring system. The accuracy of the developed system was studied by imaging an anthropomorphic phantom implanted with radiopaque markers set to known offset positions from its reference position in an Elekta linear accelerator (LA) and associated XVI imaging system. The accuracy of the system was further validated using CBCT data set from 10 prostate SBRT patients. The time gains achieved with the stereo image based position correction was compared with the manual matching of seed positions in Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) and kV images in the Mosaiq record and verify system. RESULTS Based on phantom and patient CBCT dataset study stereo imaging module implemented in the SeedTracker shown to have an accuracy of 0.1(σ=0.5)mm in detecting the 3D position offset. The time comparison study showed that stereo image based methodology implemented in SeedTracker was a minimum of 80(4)s faster than the manual method implemented in Mosaiq R&V system with a maximum time saving of 146(6)s. CONCLUSION The variable angle stereo image based position correction method was shown to be accurate and faster than the standard manual DRR-kV image based correction approach, leading to more efficient treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sankar Arumugam
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres and Ingham Institute, New South Wales, Australia; South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Mark Sidhom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Truant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aitang Xing
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres and Ingham Institute, New South Wales, Australia; South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Udovitch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres and Ingham Institute, New South Wales, Australia; South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia; Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Small field output factors evaluation with a microDiamond detector over 30 Italian centers. Phys Med 2016; 32:1644-1650. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2016] [Revised: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
19
|
Osman SOS, Jeevanandam P, Kanakavelu N, Irvine DM, Lyons CA, Jain S, Hounsell AR, McGarry CK. Class solutions for SABR-VMAT for high-risk prostate cancer with and without elective nodal irradiation. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:155. [PMID: 27881187 PMCID: PMC5121961 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0730-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to find the optimal planning settings for prostate SABR-VMAT for high-risk prostate cancer patients irradiated to prostate only (PO) or prostate and pelvic lymph nodes (PPLN). METHODS For 10 patients, plans using 6MV flattened, flattening-filter-free (FFF) 6MV (6 F) and FFF 10MV (10 F) photon beams with full and partial arc arrangements were generated and compared. The prescribed dose was 40Gy to the prostate with 25Gy to the PLN in 5 fractions. Plans were then evaluated for PTV coverage, dose fall-off, and OAR doses. The number of monitor units and the treatment delivery times were also compared. Statistical differences were evaluated using a paired sample Wilcoxon signed rank test with a significance level of 0.05%. RESULTS A total of 150 plans were generated for this study. Acceptable PO plans were obtained using single arcs, while two arcs were necessary for PPLN. All plans were highly conformal (CI ≥1.3 and CN ≥0.90) with no significant differences in the PTV dose coverage. 6MV plans required significantly longer treatment time and had higher dose spillage compared to FFF plans. Superior plans were obtained using 10 F 300° partial arcs for PO with the lowest rectal dose, dose spillage and the shortest treatment times. For PPLN, 6 F and 10 F plans were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS SABR-VMAT with FFF photon beams offers a clear benefit with respect to shorter treatment delivery times and reduced dose spillage. Class solutions using a single 10 F 300° arc for PO and two 10 F or 6 F partial 300° arcs for PPLN are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah O. S. Osman
- Centre of Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN Northern Ireland UK
| | - Prakash Jeevanandam
- Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Nithya Kanakavelu
- Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Denise M. Irvine
- Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Ciara A. Lyons
- Centre of Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN Northern Ireland UK
| | - Suneil Jain
- Centre of Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN Northern Ireland UK
- Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Alan R. Hounsell
- Centre of Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN Northern Ireland UK
- Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Conor K. McGarry
- Centre of Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN Northern Ireland UK
- Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cagni E, Russo S, Reggiori G, Bresciani S, Fedele D, Iori M, Marino C, Nardiello B, Ruggieri R, Strigari L, Mancosu P. Technical Note: Multicenter study of TrueBeam FFF beams with a new stereotactic diode: Can a common small field signal ratio curve be defined? Med Phys 2016; 43:5570. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4961744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
|
21
|
The role of medical physics in prostate cancer radiation therapy. Phys Med 2016; 32:435-7. [PMID: 27095755 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Revised: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Medical physics, both as a scientific discipline and clinical service, hugely contributed and still contributes to the advances in the radiotherapy of prostate cancer. The traditional translational role in developing and safely implementing new technology and methods for better optimizing, delivering and monitoring the treatment is rapidly expanding to include new fields such as quantitative morphological and functional imaging and the possibility of individually predicting outcome and toxicity. The pivotal position of medical physicists in treatment personalization probably represents the main challenge of current and next years and needs a gradual change of vision and training, without losing the traditional and fundamental role of physicists to guarantee a high quality of the treatment. The current focus issue is intended to cover traditional and new fields of investigation in prostate cancer radiation therapy with the aim to provide up-to-date reference material to medical physicists daily working to cure prostate cancer patients. The papers presented in this focus issue touch upon present and upcoming challenges that need to be met in order to further advance prostate cancer radiation therapy. We suggest that there is a smart future for medical physicists willing to perform research and innovate, while they continue to provide high-quality clinical service. However, physicists are increasingly expected to actively integrate their implicitly translational, flexible and high-level skills within multi-disciplinary teams including many clinical figures (first of all radiation oncologists) as well as scientists from other disciplines.
Collapse
|