1
|
Paterson A, Devlin L, Mitchell J, Ogg J, Farnan K, Coupland S, Duffton A. Survey of research attitudes of RTTs working in Scotland: A Scottish radiographer research forum collaboration. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100248. [PMID: 38707714 PMCID: PMC11067355 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Evidence-based practice (EBP) is associated with improved treatment outcomes and survival in cancer patients. Engagement from therapeutic radiographers/radiation therapists (RTTs) in research, has been identified as a challenge. The aim of this survey was to gain an understanding of RTT attitudes to research in Scotland. Methods This was a prospective study that used a mixed method cross-sectional survey, with an online survey tool (Webropol). The survey was developed with collaborators from all Scottish Radiotherapy Centres (n = 5) and piloted by 6 conveniently sampled RTT and validated by 8 experienced RTTs. The survey comprised 29 items, 7 selection-based demographic questions, and 18 statements with a Likert 5-point metric scale rating (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). The validity was measured with the content validity index (CVI) and item-CVI by 8 experienced RTTs. Low scoring I-CVI (<0.78) questions were removed.A total of 314 RTTs working in Scottish Radiotherapy Centres were invited to participate. Approvals were given by each Head of department (HoD), who also confirmed number of RTTs. Results A total of 102/314 (32.5 %) RTTs responded. The majority of RTTs agreed they were confident they had sufficient research skills to inform EBP (n = 58/102, 56.9 %), felt confident discussing EBP with colleagues (n = 67, 65.7 %) and felt research was important for role development (n = 89, 87.2 %). Low mean scores and standard deviation (SD) were observed for the following: "I know how to get involved in research" 3.2 (1.2), "I have been given the opportunity to get involved in research" 3.2 (1.1), and "I am well informed about current research projects in my department" 3.2 (1.1). 57.8 % (n = 59) of RTTs disagreed they were confident adequate time would be provided to be involved in research. Conclusion The survey results demonstrated a predominantly positive attitude to research amongst RTTs working in Scottish centres, with most common perceived barriers being access to protected time and staff; training, and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Paterson
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Lynsey Devlin
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Sciences and University of Glasgow, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Joanne Mitchell
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Fettes College, 2 Carrington Road, Edinburgh EH4 1QJ, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline Ogg
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsty Farnan
- Ninewells Radiotherapy Department, James Arrott Drive, Dundee DD2 1UB, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Coupland
- Raigmore Hospital Inverness, Old Perth Road, Inverness IV2 3UJ, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Aileen Duffton
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Sciences and University of Glasgow, Switchback Road, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knäusl B, Belotti G, Bertholet J, Daartz J, Flampouri S, Hoogeman M, Knopf AC, Lin H, Moerman A, Paganelli C, Rucinski A, Schulte R, Shimizu S, Stützer K, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Czerska K. A review of the clinical introduction of 4D particle therapy research concepts. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100535. [PMID: 38298885 PMCID: PMC10828898 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Many 4D particle therapy research concepts have been recently translated into clinics, however, remaining substantial differences depend on the indication and institute-related aspects. This work aims to summarise current state-of-the-art 4D particle therapy technology and outline a roadmap for future research and developments. Material and methods This review focused on the clinical implementation of 4D approaches for imaging, treatment planning, delivery and evaluation based on the 2021 and 2022 4D Treatment Workshops for Particle Therapy as well as a review of the most recent surveys, guidelines and scientific papers dedicated to this topic. Results Available technological capabilities for motion surveillance and compensation determined the course of each 4D particle treatment. 4D motion management, delivery techniques and strategies including imaging were diverse and depended on many factors. These included aspects of motion amplitude, tumour location, as well as accelerator technology driving the necessity of centre-specific dosimetric validation. Novel methodologies for X-ray based image processing and MRI for real-time tumour tracking and motion management were shown to have a large potential for online and offline adaptation schemes compensating for potential anatomical changes over the treatment course. The latest research developments were dominated by particle imaging, artificial intelligence methods and FLASH adding another level of complexity but also opportunities in the context of 4D treatments. Conclusion This review showed that the rapid technological advances in radiation oncology together with the available intrafractional motion management and adaptive strategies paved the way towards clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Knäusl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriele Belotti
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Juliane Daartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antje C Knopf
- Institut für Medizintechnik und Medizininformatik Hochschule für Life Sciences FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Astrid Moerman
- Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Reinhard Schulte
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University
| | - Shing Shimizu
- Department of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Katarzyna Czerska
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Trnkova P, Toshito T, Heijmen B, Richter C, Aznar M, Albertini F, Bolsi A, Daartz J, Bertholet J, Knopf A. A survey of practice patterns for real-time intrafractional motion-management in particle therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 26:100439. [PMID: 37124167 PMCID: PMC10133874 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Organ motion compromises accurate particle therapy delivery. This study reports on the practice patterns for real-time intrafractional motion-management in particle therapy to evaluate current clinical practice and wishes and barriers to implementation. Materials and methods An institutional questionnaire was distributed to particle therapy centres worldwide (7/2020-6/2021) asking which type(s) of real-time respiratory motion management (RRMM) methods were used, for which treatment sites, and what were the wishes and barriers to implementation. This was followed by a three-round DELPHI consensus analysis (10/2022) to define recommendations on required actions and future vision. With 70 responses from 17 countries, response rate was 100% for Europe (23/23 centres), 96% for Japan (22/23) and 53% for USA (20/38). Results Of the 68 clinically operational centres, 85% used RRMM, with 41% using both rescanning and active methods. Sixty-four percent used active-RRMM for at least one treatment site, mostly with gating guided by an external marker. Forty-eight percent of active-RRMM users wished to expand or change their RRMM technique. The main barriers were technical limitations and limited resources. From the DELPHI analysis, optimisation of rescanning parameters, improvement of motion models, and pre-treatment 4D evaluation were unanimously considered clinically important future focus. 4D dose calculation was identified as the top requirement for future commercial treatment planning software. Conclusion A majority of particle therapy centres have implemented RRMM. Still, further development and clinical integration were desired by most centres. Joint industry, clinical and research efforts are needed to translate innovation into efficient workflows for broad-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Petra Trnkova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Toshiyuki Toshito
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marianne Aznar
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Juliane Daartz
- F. Burr Proton Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antje Knopf
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Science FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Placidi L, Castriconi R, Rancati T, Lecchi M, Fusi F, Russo P, Cavedon C, Fiorino C, Garibaldi C. The scientific publications of AIFM members in 2015-2019: A survey of the FutuRuS working group. Phys Med 2021; 88:111-116. [PMID: 34225239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Within the Italian Association of Medical Physics and Health Physics (AIFM) working group "FutuRuS" we carried out a survey regarding the number of the peer-reviewed articles by AIFM members. METHODS We surveyed papers published in the years 2015-2019. Data extracted from Scopus included information regarding authors, title, journal, impact factor (IF), leading or standard authorship by AIFM members, keywords, type of collaboration (monocentric/multicentric/international), area of interest [radiation oncology (RO), radiology (RAD), nuclear medicine (NM), radioprotection (RP) and professional issue (PI)] and topics. RESULTS We found 1210 papers published in peer-reviewed journals: 48%, 22%, 16%, 6%, 2 and 6% in RO, RAD, NM, RP, PI and other topics, respectively. Forty-seven percent of the papers involved monocentric teams, 31% multicentric and 22% international collaborations. Leading authorship of AIFM members was in 56% of papers, with a corresponding IF equal to 52% of the total IF (3342, IFmean = 2.8, IFmax = 35.4). The most represented journal was Physica Medica, with 15% of papers, while a relevant fraction of IF (54%) appeared in clinically oriented journals. The number of papers increased significantly between 2015 and 2016 and remained almost constant in 2017-2019. CONCLUSIONS This survey led to the first quantitative assessment of the number and theme distribution of peer-reviewed scientific articles contributed by AIFM members. It constitutes a ground basis to support future AIFM strategies and promote working groups on scientific activity of medical physicists, and to build the basis for rational comparison with other countries, first of all within Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Tiziana Rancati
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Michela Lecchi
- Health Physics Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Fusi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Russo
- Università di Napoli Federico II, Dipartimento di Fisica "Ettore Pancini", Napoli, Italy
| | - Carlo Cavedon
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata - Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Medical Physics, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Cristina Garibaldi
- Unit of Radiation Research, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Emert F, Missimer J, Eichenberger PA, Walser M, Gmür C, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, Spengler CM. Enhanced Deep-Inspiration Breath Hold Superior to High-Frequency Percussive Ventilation for Respiratory Motion Mitigation: A Physiology-Driven, MRI-Guided Assessment Toward Optimized Lung Cancer Treatment With Proton Therapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:621350. [PMID: 33996545 PMCID: PMC8116693 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.621350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To safely treat lung tumors using particle radiation therapy (PRT), motion-mitigation strategies are of critical importance to ensure precise irradiation. Therefore, we compared applicability, effectiveness, reproducibility, and subjects' acceptance of enhanced deep-inspiration breath hold (eDIBH) with high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) by MRI assessment within 1 month. Methods: Twenty-one healthy subjects (12 males/9 females; age: 49.5 ± 5.8 years; BMI: 24.7 ± 3.3 kg/m−2) performed two 1.5 T MRI scans in four visits at weekly intervals under eDIBH and HFPV conditions, accompanied by daily, home-based breath-hold training and spirometric assessments over a 3-week period. eDIBH consisted of 8-min 100% O2 breathing (3 min resting ventilation, 5 min controlled hyperventilation) prior to breath hold. HFPV was set at 200–250 pulses min−1 and 0.8–1.2 bar. Subjects' acceptance and preference were evaluated by questionnaire. To quantify inter- and intrafractional changes, a lung distance metric representing lung topography was computed for 10 reference points: a motion-invariant spinal cord and nine lung structure contours (LSCs: apex, carina, diaphragm, and six vessels as tumor surrogates distributed equally across the lung). To parameterize individual LSC localizability, measures of their spatial variabilities were introduced and lung volumes calculated by automated MRI analysis. Results: eDIBH increased breath-hold duration by > 100% up to 173 ± 73 s at visit 1, and to 217 ± 67 s after 3 weeks of home-based training at visit 4 (p < 0.001). Measures of vital capacity and lung volume remained constant over the 3-week period. Two vessels in the lower lung segment and the diaphragm yielded a two- to threefold improved positional stability with eDIBH, whereby absolute distance variability was significantly smaller for five LSCs; ≥70% of subjects showed significantly better intrafractional lung motion mitigation under reproducible conditions with eDIBH compared with HFPV with smaller ranges most apparent in the anterior-posterior and cranial-caudal directions. Approximately 80% of subjects preferred eDIBH over HFPV, with “less discomfort” named as most frequent reason. Conclusions: Both, eDIBH, and HFPV were well-tolerated. eDIBH duration was long enough to allow for potential PRT. Variability in lung volume was smaller and position of lung structures more precise with eDIBH. Subjects preferred eDIBH over HFPV. Thus, eDIBH is a very promising tool for lung tumor therapy with PRT, and further investigation of its applicability in patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Emert
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - John Missimer
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Philipp A Eichenberger
- Exercise Physiology Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Celina Gmür
- Exercise Physiology Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christina M Spengler
- Exercise Physiology Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology (ZIHP), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Czerska K, Emert F, Kopec R, Langen K, McClelland JR, Meijers A, Miyamoto N, Riboldi M, Shimizu S, Terunuma T, Zou W, Knopf A, Rucinski A. Clinical practice vs. state-of-the-art research and future visions: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshop for particle therapy - Edition 2018 and 2019. Phys Med 2021; 82:54-63. [PMID: 33588228 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The 4D Treatment Planning Workshop for Particle Therapy, a workshop dedicated to the treatment of moving targets with scanned particle beams, started in 2009 and since then has been organized annually. The mission of the workshop is to create an informal ground for clinical medical physicists, medical physics researchers and medical doctors interested in the development of the 4D technology, protocols and their translation into clinical practice. The 10th and 11th editions of the workshop took place in Sapporo, Japan in 2018 and Krakow, Poland in 2019, respectively. This review report from the Sapporo and Krakow workshops is structured in two parts, according to the workshop programs. The first part comprises clinicians and physicists review of the status of 4D clinical implementations. Corresponding talks were given by speakers from five centers around the world: Maastro Clinic (The Netherlands), University Medical Center Groningen (The Netherlands), MD Anderson Cancer Center (United States), University of Pennsylvania (United States) and The Proton Beam Therapy Center of Hokkaido University Hospital (Japan). The second part is dedicated to novelties in 4D research, i.e. motion modelling, artificial intelligence and new technologies which are currently being investigated in the radiotherapy field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Czerska
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.
| | - Frank Emert
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | - Renata Kopec
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Katja Langen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jamie R McClelland
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arturs Meijers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Naoki Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Terunuma
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan; Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Japan
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Antje Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Krieger M, Giger A, Jud C, Duetschler A, Salomir R, Bieri O, Bauman G, Nguyen D, Cattin PC, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Zhang Y. Liver-ultrasound-guided lung tumour tracking for scanned proton therapy: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:035011. [PMID: 33238246 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcde6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton therapy of lung tumours is hampered by respiratory motion and the motion-induced density changes along the beam path. In this simulation study, we aim to investigate the effectiveness of proton beam tracking for lung tumours both under ideal conditions and in conjunction with a respiratory motion model guided by real-time ultrasound imaging of the liver. Multiple-breathing-cycle 4DMRIs of the thorax and abdominal 2D ultrasound images were acquired simultaneously for five volunteers. Deformation vector fields extracted from the 4DMRI, referred to as ground truth motion, were used to generate 4DCT(MRI) data sets of two lung cancer patients, resulting in 10 data sets with variable motion patterns. Given the 4DCT(MRI) and the corresponding ultrasound images as surrogate data, a patient-specific motion model was built. The model consists of an autoregressive model and Gaussian process regression for the temporal and spatial prediction, respectively. Two-field PBS plans were optimised on the reference CTs, and 4D dose calculations (4DDC) were used to simulate dose delivery for (a) unmitigated motion, (b) ideal 2D and 3D tracking (both beam adaption and 4DDC based on ground truth motion), and (c) realistic 2D and 3D tracking (beam adaption based on motion predictions, 4DDC on ground truth motion). Model-guided tracking retrieved clinically acceptable target dose homogeneity, as seen in a substantial reduction of the D5%-D95% compared to the non-mitigated simulation. Tracking in 2D and 3D resulted in a similar improvement of the dose homogeneity, as did ideal and realistic tracking simulations. In some cases, however, the tracked deliveries resulted in a shift towards higher or lower dose levels, leading to unacceptable target over- or under-coverage. The presented motion modelling framework was shown to be an accurate motion prediction tool for the use in proton beam tracking. Tracking alone, however, may not always effectively mitigate motion effects, making it necessary to combine it with other techniques such as rescanning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Krieger
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen PSI, Switzerland. Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mitigation of motion effects in pencil-beam scanning - Impact of repainting on 4D robustly optimized proton treatment plans for hepatocellular carcinoma. Z Med Phys 2020; 32:63-73. [PMID: 33131995 PMCID: PMC9948857 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Proton fields delivered by the active scanning technique can be interfered with the intrafractional motion. This in-silico study seeks to mitigate the dosimetric impacts of motion artifacts, especially its interplay with the time-modulated dose delivery. Here four-dimensional (4d) robust optimization and dose repainting, which is the multiple application of the same field with reduced fluence, were combined. Two types of repainting were considered: layered and volumetric repainting. The time-resolved dose calculation, which is necessary to quantify the interplay effect, was integrated into the treatment planning system and validated. Nine clinical cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showing motion in the range of 0.4-1.5cm were studied. It was found that the repainted delivery of 4D robustly optimized plans reduced the impact of interplay effect as quantified by the homogeneity index within the clinical target volume (CTV) to a tolerable level. Similarly, the fractional over- and underdosage was reduced sufficiently for some HCC cases to achieve the purpose of motion management. This holds true for both investigated types of repainting with small dosimetric advantages of volume repainting over layered repainting. Volume repainting, however, cannot be applied clinically in proton centers with slow energy changes. Thus, it served as a reference in the in-silico evaluation. It is recommended to perform the dynamic dose calculation for individual cases to judge if robust optimization in conjunction with repainting is sufficient to keep the interplay effect within bounds.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fattori G, Zhang Y, Meer D, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Safai S. The potential of Gantry beamline large momentum acceptance for real time tumour tracking in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:15325. [PMID: 32948790 PMCID: PMC7501279 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71821-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumour tracking is an advanced radiotherapy technique for precise treatment of tumours subject to organ motion. In this work, we addressed crucial aspects of dose delivery for its realisation in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, exploring the momentum acceptance and global achromaticity of a Gantry beamline to perform continuous energy regulation with a standard upstream degrader. This novel approach is validated on simulation data from three geometric phantoms of increasing complexity and one liver cancer patient using 4D dose calculations. Results from a standard high-to-low beamline ramping scheme were compared to alternative energy meandering schemes including combinations with rescanning. Target coverage and dose conformity were generally well recovered with tumour tracking even though for particularly small targets, large variations are reported for the different approaches. Meandering in energy while rescanning has a positive impact on target homogeneity and similarly, hot spots outside the targets are mitigated with a relatively fast convergence rate for most tracking scenarios, halving the volume of hot spots after as little as 3 rescans. This work investigates the yet unexplored potential of having a large momentum acceptance in medical beam line, and provides an alternative to take tumour tracking with particle therapy closer to clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Fattori
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland.
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - David Meer
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, 3000, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony John Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Scholz M. State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects of Ion Beam Therapy: Physical and Radiobiological Aspects. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020. [DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2019.2935240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
11
|
Dose assessment for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer receiving passive scattering carbon-ion radiotherapy using daily computed tomographic images: A prospective study. Radiother Oncol 2020; 144:224-230. [PMID: 32044421 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study aimed to assess dose distributions for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with passive scattering carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) using daily computed tomography (CT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS We enrolled 10 patients with stage I NSCLC and acquired a total of 40 pre-fractional CT image series under the same settings as the planning CT images. These CT images were registered with planning CT images for dose evaluation using both bone matching (BM) and tumor matching (TM). Using deformable image registration, we generated accumulated doses. Moreover, the volumetric dose parameters were compared in terms of tumor coverage and lung exposure and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS Overall, 25% of 40 fractional dose distributions were unacceptable with BM, compared with 2.5% with TM (P < 0.001). Using BM, three patients' accumulated dose distributions were unacceptable; however, all were satisfactory with TM (P < 0.001). No differences were observed in water-equivalent path length (WEL). The required margins in patients with poor dose distribution were 5.9 and 4.4 mm for BM and TM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes that CT image-based TM is robust compared with conventional BM for both daily and accumulated dose distributions. The effects of changes in WEL seem to be limited. Hence, daily CT alignment is recommended for patients with stage I NSCLC receiving C-ion RT.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kostiukhina N, Palmans H, Stock M, Georg D, Knäusl B. Dynamic lung phantom commissioning for 4D dose assessment in proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:235001. [PMID: 31652424 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Anthropomorphic phantoms mimicking organ and tumor motion of patients are essential for end-to-end testing of motion mitigation techniques in ion beam therapy. In this work a commissioning procedure developed with the in-house designed respiratory phantom ARDOS (Advanced Radiation DOSimetry system) is presented. The phantom was tested and benchmarked for 4D dose verification in proton therapy, which included: characterization of the tissue equivalent materials from computed tomography (CT) imaging, assessment of dose calculation accuracy in critical structures of the phantom, and testing various detectors for proton dosimetry in the ARDOS phantom. To prove the validity of the CT calibration curve, measured relative stopping powers (RSP) of the ARDOS materials were compared with values from CTs: original and overwritten with known material parameters. Override of rib- and soft-tissue phantom components improved RSP accuracy while inhomogeneous lung tissue, represented by the balsa wood, was better modelled by the CT Hounsfield units. Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations were benchmarked against measurements with a reference Farmer chamber embedded in ARDOS material samples showing less than 3% relative dose difference. Differences between MC calculated dose distributions and those calculated by analytical algorithms for the ARDOS geometry were higher than 20% of the prescribed dose, depending on the position in the phantom. Pinpoint ionization chambers and thermoluminescence dosimeters showed differences of up to 5.5% compared to MC dose calculations for all lung setups in the static phantom. They were also able to detect dose distortions due to motion. EBT3 film dosimetry was shown to be suitable for 2D relative dose characterization, which could provide extended information on dose distributions in the penumbra area. The presented methodology and results can be used for drafting general recommendations for dynamic phantom commissioning, which is an essential step towards end-to-end evaluation of motion mitigation techniques in ion beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Kostiukhina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division Medical Radiation Physics, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Author to whom correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Burigo LN, Oborn BM. MRI-guided proton therapy planning: accounting for an inline MRI fringe field. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:215015. [PMID: 31509819 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab436a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
MRI-guided proton therapy is being pursued for its promise to provide a more conformal, accurate proton therapy. However, the presence of the magnetic field imposes a challenge for the beam delivery as protons are deflected due to the Lorenz force. In this study, the impact of realistic inline MRI fringe field on IMPT plan delivery is investigated for a water phantom, liver tumor and prostate cancer differing in target volume, shape, and field configuration using Monte Carlo simulations. A method to correct for the shift of the beam spot positions in the presence of the inline magnetic field is presented. Results show that when not accounting for the effect of the magnetic field on the pencil beam delivery, the spot positions are substantially shifted and the quality of delivered plans is significantly deteriorated leading to dose inhomogeneities and creation of hot and cold spots. However, by correcting the pencil beam delivery, the dose quality of the IMPT plans is restored to a high degree. Nevertheless, adaptation of beam delivery alone is not robust regarding different treatment sites. By fully accounting during plan optimization for the dose distortions caused by the fringe and imaging fields, highly conformal IMPT plans are achieved. These results demonstrate proton pencil beam scanning and treatment planning can be adapted for precise delivery of state-of-the-art IMPT plans in MR-guided proton therapy in the presence of an inline MRI fringe field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas N Burigo
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Real-time control of respiratory motion: Beyond radiation therapy. Phys Med 2019; 66:104-112. [PMID: 31586767 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.09.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Motion management in radiation oncology is an important aspect of modern treatment planning and delivery. Special attention has been paid to control respiratory motion in recent years. However, other medical procedures related to both diagnosis and treatment are likely to benefit from the explicit control of breathing motion. Quantitative imaging - including increasingly important tools in radiology and nuclear medicine - is among the fields where a rapid development of motion control is most likely, due to the need for quantification accuracy. Emerging treatment modalities like focussed-ultrasound tumor ablation are also likely to benefit from a significant evolution of motion control in the near future. In the present article an overview of available respiratory motion systems along with ongoing research in this area is provided. Furthermore, an attempt is made to envision some of the most expected developments in this field in the near future.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bertholet J, Knopf A, Eiben B, McClelland J, Grimwood A, Harris E, Menten M, Poulsen P, Nguyen DT, Keall P, Oelfke U. Real-time intrafraction motion monitoring in external beam radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:15TR01. [PMID: 31226704 PMCID: PMC7655120 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2ba8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) aims to deliver a spatially conformal dose of radiation to tumours while maximizing the dose sparing to healthy tissues. However, the internal patient anatomy is constantly moving due to respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal and urinary activity. The long term goal of the RT community to 'see what we treat, as we treat' and to act on this information instantaneously has resulted in rapid technological innovation. Specialized treatment machines, such as robotic or gimbal-steered linear accelerators (linac) with in-room imaging suites, have been developed specifically for real-time treatment adaptation. Additional equipment, such as stereoscopic kilovoltage (kV) imaging, ultrasound transducers and electromagnetic transponders, has been developed for intrafraction motion monitoring on conventional linacs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been integrated with cobalt treatment units and more recently with linacs. In addition to hardware innovation, software development has played a substantial role in the development of motion monitoring methods based on respiratory motion surrogates and planar kV or Megavoltage (MV) imaging that is available on standard equipped linacs. In this paper, we review and compare the different intrafraction motion monitoring methods proposed in the literature and demonstrated in real-time on clinical data as well as their possible future developments. We then discuss general considerations on validation and quality assurance for clinical implementation. Besides photon RT, particle therapy is increasingly used to treat moving targets. However, transferring motion monitoring technologies from linacs to particle beam lines presents substantial challenges. Lessons learned from the implementation of real-time intrafraction monitoring for photon RT will be used as a basis to discuss the implementation of these methods for particle RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Bertholet
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS
Foundation Trust, London, United
Kingdom
- Author to whom any correspondence should be
addressed
| | - Antje Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology,
University Medical Center
Groningen, University of Groningen, The
Netherlands
| | - Björn Eiben
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical
Engineering, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London,
United Kingdom
| | - Jamie McClelland
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical
Engineering, Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London,
United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Grimwood
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS
Foundation Trust, London, United
Kingdom
| | - Emma Harris
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS
Foundation Trust, London, United
Kingdom
| | - Martin Menten
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS
Foundation Trust, London, United
Kingdom
| | - Per Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus,
Denmark
| | - Doan Trang Nguyen
- ACRF Image X Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney,
Australia
- School of Biomedical Engineering,
University of Technology
Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul Keall
- ACRF Image X Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney,
Australia
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS
Foundation Trust, London, United
Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang Y, Huth I, Weber DC, Lomax AJ. Dosimetric uncertainties as a result of temporal resolution in 4D dose calculations for PBS proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:125005. [PMID: 31035271 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1d6f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
This work investigates the dosimetric impact on 4D dose distribution estimation for pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton therapy as function of the temporal resolution used for the time resolved dose calculation. For three liver patients (CTV volume: 403/122/264 cc), 10-phase 4DCT-MRI datasets with ~15 mm tumour motion were simulated for seven different motion periods (2-8 s). 4D dose distributions were calculated and compared by considering both coarser and finer temporal resolutions (200-800 ms and 20 ms). Single scanned 4D plans for seven fraction doses (0.7/2/4/6/8/10/12 Gy) were investigated, whose dose delivery timelines were simulated by assuming two types of PBS scanning modes: (1) layer-wise raster scanning with varying dose rate per layer and (2) fixed dose rate, discrete scanning. For both delivery scenarios, dosimetric assessments were performed by comparing corresponding dose distributions derived from the two 4D dose calculation (4DDC) results. Differences were quantified as the difference in D5-D95 of the CTV and by comparing total volume of the CTV receiving point-to-point absolute dose difference more than 5%. Our results show that varying temporal resolution in 4DDC has a direct influence on the final accumulated dose distribution. For all scenarios, patients, fraction doses and motion periods studied, pronounced dose differences can be observed between the two 4DDC results. However, the magnitude of differences varies depending on the selected PBS scanning model and prescribed dose per field. For fixed dose rate delivery, the average duration of the delivery of each spot increases for hypo-fractionated treatments, enhancing the benefit of using a finer temporal resolution for 4DDC. In particular, for fraction doses >4 Gy and motion periods less than 4 s, warping the dose between discrete 4DCT phases can over predict the interplay effect (D5-D95 in CTV) by 3%-10% compared to the use of a finer temporal resolution, resulting in more than 20% of CTV voxels having absolute dose differences of over 5% between the two 4DDC approaches. These findings emphasize the importance for PBS 4DDC using finer temporal resolutions than provided by conventional 4D dose accumulation techniques. In particular, the observed differences in dosimetric effects using the fine temporal resolution provided by dose warping cannot be neglected for hypo-fractionation and short breathing periods, especially when using constant dose rates for dose delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
The dosimetric effect of residual breath-hold motion in pencil beam scanned proton therapy – An experimental study. Radiother Oncol 2019; 134:135-142. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
18
|
Giordanengo S, Vignati A, Attili A, Ciocca M, Donetti M, Fausti F, Manganaro L, Milian FM, Molinelli S, Monaco V, Russo G, Sacchi R, Varasteh Anvar M, Cirio R. RIDOS: A new system for online computation of the delivered dose distributions in scanning ion beam therapy. Phys Med 2019; 60:139-149. [PMID: 31000074 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe a new system for scanned ion beam therapy, named RIDOS (Real-time Ion DOse planning and delivery System), which performs real time delivered dose verification integrating the information from a clinical beam monitoring system with a Graphic Processing Unit (GPU) based dose calculation in patient Computed Tomography. METHODS A benchmarked dose computation algorithm for scanned ion beams has been parallelized and adapted to run on a GPU architecture. A workstation equipped with a NVIDIA GPU has been interfaced through a National Instruments PXI-crate with the dose delivery system of the Italian National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) to receive in real-time the measured beam parameters. Data from a patient monitoring system are also collected to associate the respiratory phases with each spot during the delivery of the dose. Using both measured and planned spot properties, RIDOS evaluates during the few seconds of inter-spill time the cumulative delivered and prescribed dose distributions and compares them through a fast γ-index algorithm. RESULTS The accuracy of the GPU-based algorithms was assessed against the CPU-based ones and the differences were found below 1‰. The cumulative planned and delivered doses are computed at the end of each spill in about 300 ms, while the dose comparison takes approximatively 400 ms. The whole operation provides the results before the next spill starts. CONCLUSIONS RIDOS system is able to provide a fast computation of the delivered dose in the inter-spill time of the CNAO facility and allows to monitor online the dose deposition accuracy all along the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Giordanengo
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy.
| | - A Vignati
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - A Attili
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - M Ciocca
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Strada Campeggi 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - M Donetti
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Strada Campeggi 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - F Fausti
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy; Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
| | - L Manganaro
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy; Università di Torino, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - F M Milian
- Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Rod Jorge Amado, km 16, 45652900 Ilheus, Brazil; Università di Torino, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - S Molinelli
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Strada Campeggi 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - V Monaco
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy; Università di Torino, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - G Russo
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - R Sacchi
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy; Università di Torino, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - M Varasteh Anvar
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy; Università di Torino, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - R Cirio
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy; Università di Torino, Via Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Meijers A, Jakobi A, Stützer K, Guterres Marmitt G, Both S, Langendijk JA, Richter C, Knopf A. Log file-based dose reconstruction and accumulation for 4D adaptive pencil beam scanned proton therapy in a clinical treatment planning system: Implementation and proof-of-concept. Med Phys 2019; 46:1140-1149. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. Meijers
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - A. Jakobi
- Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology; Technische Universität Dresden; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Dresden Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology; Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; Technische Universität Dresden; Dresden Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay; Dresden Germany
| | - K. Stützer
- Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology; Technische Universität Dresden; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Dresden Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay; Dresden Germany
| | - G. Guterres Marmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - S. Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - J. A. Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - C. Richter
- Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology; Technische Universität Dresden; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Dresden Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology; Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; Technische Universität Dresden; Dresden Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay; Dresden Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
| | - A. Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fracchiolla F, Dionisi F, Giacomelli I, Hild S, Esposito PG, Lorentini S, Engwall E, Amichetti M, Schwarz M. Implementation of proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning of targets with limited intrafraction motion. Phys Med 2019; 57:215-220. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
|
21
|
Radiation Therapy in Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer. Radiat Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_34-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
22
|
Placidi L, Togno M, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Hrbacek J. Range resolution and reproducibility of a dedicated phantom for proton PBS daily quality assurance. Z Med Phys 2018; 28:310-317. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
23
|
Pfeiler T, Ahmad Khalil D, Ayadi M, Bäumer C, Blanck O, Chan M, Engwall E, Geismar D, Peters S, Plaude S, Spaan B, Timmermann B, Wulff J. Motion effects in proton treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma-4D robustly optimised pencil beam scanning plans versus double scattering plans. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:235006. [PMID: 30468685 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaecfc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy enables better dose conformality for complex anatomical geometries than passive proton scattering techniques, but is more susceptible to organ motion. This becomes an issue when treating moving tumours in the thorax or abdomen. Novel four-dimensional treatment planning approaches have been developed to increase the robustness of PBS plans against motion. However, their efficacy still needs to be examined by means of 4D dynamically accumulated dose (4DDD) analyses. This study investigates the potential use of 4D robust optimisation to maintain sufficient target coverage in the presence of organ motion, while sparing surrounding healthy tissue, for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The liver is particularly suited to study motion interplay effects since the treatment region exhibits smaller density gradients and more homogeneous tissue than targets in the thorax, making it less prone to range errors. A facility-specific beam time model, developed and experimentally validated previously, was used for the clinical evaluation. 4DDD analyses of eleven target volumes did not show a significant improvement of the target coverage using 4D robust optimisation, but a reduction of the dose to close-by organs at risk. Interplay effects were averaged out for the applied fractionation scheme of 15 fractions. Contrary to PBS, passive double scattering (DS) plans yielded homogeneous 4DDD dose distributions in a single fraction. But, in some cases, they exceeded organ at risk dose limits, which were only satisfied in PBS. The average normal liver dose could be decreased by almost 6% compared to non-robustly optimised PBS plans and by 16% compared to DS plans when implementing 4D robust optimisation. Except for some very small tumours with large motion amplitudes, 4D robustly optimised PBS plans were found to be clinically acceptable even without supplementary motion mitigation techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Pfeiler
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany. West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany. TU Dortmund University, Experimental Physics 5, Dortmund, Germany. Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Trnková P, Knäusl B, Actis O, Bert C, Biegun AK, Boehlen TT, Furtado H, McClelland J, Mori S, Rinaldi I, Rucinski A, Knopf AC. Clinical implementations of 4D pencil beam scanned particle therapy: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2016 and 2017. Phys Med 2018; 54:121-130. [PMID: 30337001 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2016 and 2017, the 8th and 9th 4D treatment planning workshop took place in Groningen (the Netherlands) and Vienna (Austria), respectively. This annual workshop brings together international experts to discuss research, advances in clinical implementation as well as problems and challenges in 4D treatment planning, mainly in spot scanned proton therapy. In the last two years several aspects like treatment planning, beam delivery, Monte Carlo simulations, motion modeling and monitoring, QA phantoms as well as 4D imaging were thoroughly discussed. This report provides an overview of discussed topics, recent findings and literature review from the last two years. Its main focus is to highlight translation of 4D research into clinical practice and to discuss remaining challenges and pitfalls that still need to be addressed and to be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Trnková
- HollandPTC, P.O. Box 5046, 2600 GA Delft, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, P.O. Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara Knäusl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Austria
| | - Oxana Actis
- Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Aleksandra K Biegun
- KVI-Center for Advanced Radiation Technology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Till T Boehlen
- Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Hugo Furtado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Austria
| | - Jamie McClelland
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Dept. Medical Physics and Biomedical, University College London, London, UK
| | - Shinichiro Mori
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences for Charged Particle Therapy, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ilaria Rinaldi
- Lyon 1 University and CNRS/IN2P3, UMR 5822, 69622 Villeurbanne, France; MAASTRO Clinic, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Antje C Knopf
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Engwall E, Fredriksson A, Glimelius L. 4D robust optimization including uncertainties in time structures can reduce the interplay effect in proton pencil beam scanning radiation therapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:4020-4029. [PMID: 30014478 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Interplay effects in proton radiotherapy can create large distortions in the dose distribution and severely degrade the plan quality. Standard methods to mitigate these effects include abdominal compression, gating, and rescanning. We propose a new method to include the time structures of the delivery and organ motion in the framework of four-dimensional (4D) robust optimization to generate plans that are robust against interplay effects. METHODS The method considers multiple scenarios reflecting the uncertainties in the delivery and in the organ motion. In each scenario, the pencil beam scanning spots are distributed to different phases of the breathing cycle according to each individual spot time stamp, and a partial beam dose is calculated for each phase. The partial beam doses are accumulated on a reference phase through deformable image registrations. Minimax optimization is performed to take all scenarios into account simultaneously. For simplicity, the uncertainties in this proof of concept study are limited to variations in the breathing pattern. The method is evaluated for three different nonsmall cell lung cancer patients and compared to plans using conventional 4D robust optimization both with and without rescanning. We assess the ability of the method to mitigate distortions from the interplay effect over multiple evaluation scenarios using 4D dose calculations. This interplay evaluation is performed in an experimentally validated framework, which is independent of the optimization in the plan generation step. RESULTS For the three studied patients, 4D optimization including time structures is efficient, especially for large tumor motions, where rescanning of conventional 4D robustly optimized plans is not sufficient to mitigate the interplay effect. The most efficient approach of the new method is achieved when it is combined with rescanning. For the patient with the largest motion, the mean V95% is 99.2% and mean V107% is 3.65% for the best rescanned 4D plan optimized with time structure. This can be compared to conventional 4D optimized plans with mean V95% of 92.7% and mean V107% of 13.1%. CONCLUSIONS The current study shows the potential of reducing interplay effects in proton pencil beam scanning radiotherapy by incorporating organ motion and delivery characteristics in a 4D robust optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Engwall
- RaySearch Laboratories, Sveavägen 44, Stockholm, SE-111 34, Sweden
| | | | - Lars Glimelius
- RaySearch Laboratories, Sveavägen 44, Stockholm, SE-111 34, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Engwall E, Glimelius L, Hynning E. Effectiveness of different rescanning techniques for scanned proton radiotherapy in lung cancer patients. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:095006. [PMID: 29616984 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aabb7b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a tumour type thought to be well-suited for proton radiotherapy. However, the lung region poses many problems related to organ motion and can for actively scanned beams induce severe interplay effects. In this study we investigate four mitigating rescanning techniques: (1) volumetric rescanning, (2) layered rescanning, (3) breath-sampled (BS) layered rescanning, and (4) continuous breath-sampled (CBS) layered rescanning. The breath-sampled methods will spread the layer rescans over a full breathing cycle, resulting in an improved averaging effect at the expense of longer treatment times. In CBS, we aim at further improving the averaging by delivering as many rescans as possible within one breathing cycle. The interplay effect was evaluated for 4D robustly optimized treatment plans (with and without rescanning) for seven NSCLC patients in the treatment planning system RayStation. The optimization and final dose calculation used a Monte Carlo dose engine to account for the density heterogeneities in the lung region. A realistic treatment delivery time structure given from the IBA ScanAlgo simulation tool served as basis for the interplay evaluation. Both slow (2.0 s) and fast (0.1 s) energy switching times were simulated. For all seven studied patients, rescanning improves the dose conformity to the target. The general trend is that the breath-sampled techniques are superior to layered and volumetric rescanning with respect to both target coverage and variability in dose to OARs. The spacing between rescans in our breath-sampled techniques is set at planning, based on the average breathing cycle length obtained in conjunction with CT acquisition. For moderately varied breathing cycle lengths between planning and delivery (up to 15%), the breath-sampled techniques still mitigate the interplay effect well. This shows the potential for smooth implementation at the clinic without additional motion monitoring equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Engwall
- RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pfeiler T, Bäumer C, Engwall E, Geismar D, Spaan B, Timmermann B. Experimental validation of a 4D dose calculation routine for pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Z Med Phys 2018; 28:121-133. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
28
|
Aznar MC, Warren S, Hoogeman M, Josipovic M. The impact of technology on the changing practice of lung SBRT. Phys Med 2018; 47:129-138. [PMID: 29331227 PMCID: PMC5883320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumours has been gaining wide acceptance in lung cancer. Here, we review the technological evolution of SBRT delivery in lung cancer, from the first treatments using the stereotactic body frame in the 1990's to modern developments in image guidance and motion management. Finally, we discuss the impact of current technological approaches on the requirements for quality assurance as well as future technological developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Camille Aznar
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Samantha Warren
- Hall Edwards Radiotherapy Group, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Section for Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bert C, Herfarth K. Management of organ motion in scanned ion beam therapy. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:170. [PMID: 29110693 PMCID: PMC5674859 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0911-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Scanned ion beam therapy has special demands for treatment of intra-fractionally moving tumors such as lesions in lung or liver. Interplay effects between beam and organ motion can in those settings lead to under-dosage of the target volume. Dedicated treatment techniques such as gating or abdominal compression are required. In addition 4D treatment planning should be used to determine strategies for patient specific treatment planning such as an increased beam focus or the use of internal target volumes incorporating range changes.Several work packages of the Clinical Research Units 214 and 214/2 funded by the German Research Council investigated the management of organ motion in scanned ion beam therapy. A focus was laid on 4D treatment planning using TRiP4D and the development of motion mitigation strategies including their quality assurance. This review focuses on the activity in the second funding period covering adaptive treatment planning strategies, 4D treatment plan optimization, and the application of motion management in pre-clinical research on radiation therapy of cardiac arrhythmias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT) and Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Giordanengo S, Manganaro L, Vignati A. Review of technologies and procedures of clinical dosimetry for scanned ion beam radiotherapy. Phys Med 2017; 43:79-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 09/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
31
|
Consensus Guidelines for Implementing Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Thoracic Malignancies on Behalf of the PTCOG Thoracic and Lymphoma Subcommittee. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:41-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
32
|
Zhang Y, Huth I, Wegner M, Weber DC, Lomax AJ. Surface as a motion surrogate for gated re-scanned pencil beam proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:4046-4061. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa66c5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
33
|
Evaluation of mesh- and binary-based contour propagation methods in 4D thoracic radiotherapy treatments using patient 4D CT images. Phys Med 2017; 36:46-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
|
34
|
Fattori G, Safai S, Carmona PF, Peroni M, Perrin R, Weber DC, Lomax AJ. Monitoring of breathing motion in image-guided PBS proton therapy: comparative analysis of optical and electromagnetic technologies. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:63. [PMID: 28359341 PMCID: PMC5374699 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0797-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Motion monitoring is essential when treating non-static tumours with pencil beam scanned protons. 4D medical imaging typically relies on the detected body surface displacement, considered as a surrogate of the patient's anatomical changes, a concept similarly applied by most motion mitigation techniques. In this study, we investigate benefits and pitfalls of optical and electromagnetic tracking, key technologies for non-invasive surface motion monitoring, in the specific environment of image-guided, gantry-based proton therapy. Methods Polaris SPECTRA optical tracking system and the Aurora V3 electromagnetic tracking system from Northern Digital Inc. (NDI, Waterloo, CA) have been compared both technically, by measuring tracking errors and system latencies under laboratory conditions, and clinically, by assessing their practicalities and sensitivities when used with imaging devices and PBS treatment gantries. Additionally, we investigated the impact of using different surrogate signals, from different systems, on the reconstructed 4D CT images. Results Even though in controlled laboratory conditions both technologies allow for the localization of static fiducials with sub-millimetre jitter and low latency (31.6 ± 1 msec worst case), significant dynamic and environmental distortions limit the potential of the electromagnetic approach in a clinical setting. The measurement error in case of close proximity to a CT scanner is up to 10.5 mm and precludes its use for the monitoring of respiratory motion during 4DCT acquisitions. Similarly, the motion of the treatment gantry distorts up to 22 mm the tracking result. Conclusions Despite the line of sight requirement, the optical solution offers the best potential, being the most robust against environmental factors and providing the highest spatial accuracy. The significant difference in the temporal location of the reconstructed phase points is used to speculate on the need to apply the same monitoring system for imaging and treatment to ensure the consistency of detected phases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Fattori
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | | | - Marta Peroni
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | - Rosalind Perrin
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland.,Radiation Oncology Department, Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony John Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland. .,Department of Physics, ETH-Hönggerberg, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Evaluation of residual abdominal tumour motion in carbon ion gated treatments through respiratory motion modelling. Phys Med 2017; 34:28-37. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Revised: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|