1
|
Missimer JH, Emert F, Lomax AJ, Weber DC. Automatic lung segmentation of magnetic resonance images: A new approach applied to healthy volunteers undergoing enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold for motion-mitigated 4D proton therapy of lung tumors. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100531. [PMID: 38292650 PMCID: PMC10825631 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Respiratory suppression techniques represent an effective motion mitigation strategy for 4D-irradiation of lung tumors with protons. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based study applied and analyzed methods for this purpose, including enhanced Deep-Inspiration-Breath-Hold (eDIBH). Twenty-one healthy volunteers (41-58 years) underwent thoracic MR scans in four imaging sessions containing two eDIBH-guided MRIs per session to simulate motion-dependent irradiation conditions. The automated MRI segmentation algorithm presented here was critical in determining the lung volumes (LVs) achieved during eDIBH. Materials and methods The study included 168 MRIs acquired under eDIBH conditions. The lung segmentation algorithm consisted of four analysis steps: (i) image preprocessing, (ii) MRI histogram analysis with thresholding, (iii) automatic segmentation, (iv) 3D-clustering. To validate the algorithm, 46 eDIBH-MRIs were manually contoured. Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and relative deviations of LVs were determined as similarity measures. Assessment of intrasessional and intersessional LV variations and their differences provided estimates of statistical and systematic errors. Results Lung segmentation time for 100 2D-MRI planes was ∼ 10 s. Compared to manual lung contouring, the median DSC was 0.94 with a lower 95 % confidence level (CL) of 0.92. The relative volume deviations yielded a median value of 0.059 and 95 % CLs of -0.013 and 0.13. Artifact-based volume errors, mainly of the trachea, were estimated. Estimated statistical and systematic errors ranged between 6 and 8 %. Conclusions The presented analytical algorithm is fast, precise, and readily available. The results are comparable to time-consuming, manual segmentations and other automatic segmentation approaches. Post-processing to remove image artifacts is under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John H. Missimer
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Frank Emert
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Antony J. Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Damien C. Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Czerska K, Emert F, Kopec R, Langen K, McClelland JR, Meijers A, Miyamoto N, Riboldi M, Shimizu S, Terunuma T, Zou W, Knopf A, Rucinski A. Clinical practice vs. state-of-the-art research and future visions: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshop for particle therapy - Edition 2018 and 2019. Phys Med 2021; 82:54-63. [PMID: 33588228 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The 4D Treatment Planning Workshop for Particle Therapy, a workshop dedicated to the treatment of moving targets with scanned particle beams, started in 2009 and since then has been organized annually. The mission of the workshop is to create an informal ground for clinical medical physicists, medical physics researchers and medical doctors interested in the development of the 4D technology, protocols and their translation into clinical practice. The 10th and 11th editions of the workshop took place in Sapporo, Japan in 2018 and Krakow, Poland in 2019, respectively. This review report from the Sapporo and Krakow workshops is structured in two parts, according to the workshop programs. The first part comprises clinicians and physicists review of the status of 4D clinical implementations. Corresponding talks were given by speakers from five centers around the world: Maastro Clinic (The Netherlands), University Medical Center Groningen (The Netherlands), MD Anderson Cancer Center (United States), University of Pennsylvania (United States) and The Proton Beam Therapy Center of Hokkaido University Hospital (Japan). The second part is dedicated to novelties in 4D research, i.e. motion modelling, artificial intelligence and new technologies which are currently being investigated in the radiotherapy field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Czerska
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.
| | - Frank Emert
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | - Renata Kopec
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Katja Langen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jamie R McClelland
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arturs Meijers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Naoki Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Terunuma
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan; Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Japan
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Antje Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lis M, Donetti M, Newhauser W, Durante M, Dey J, Weber U, Wolf M, Steinsberger T, Graeff C. A modular dose delivery system for treating moving targets with scanned ion beams: Performance and safety characteristics, and preliminary tests. Phys Med 2020; 76:307-16. [PMID: 32739784 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to develop a modular dose-delivery system (DDS) for scanned-ion radiotherapy that mitigates against organ motion artifacts by synchronizing the motion of the beam with that of the moving anatomy. METHODS We integrated a new motion synchronization system and an existing DDS into two centers. The modular approach to integration utilized an adaptive layer of software and hardware interfaces. The method of synchronization comprised three major tasks, namely, the creation of 3D treatment plans (each representing one phase of respiratory motion and together comprising a 4D plan), monitoring anatomic motion during treatment, and synchronization of the beam to anatomic motion. The synchronization was accomplished in real time by repeatedly selecting and delivering a 3D plan, i.e., the one that most closely corresponded to the current anatomic state, until all plans were delivered. The performance characteristics of the motion mitigation system were tested by delivering 4D treatment plans to a moving phantom and comparing planned and measured dose distributions. Dosimetric performance was considered acceptable when the gamma-index pass rate was >90%, homogeneity-index value was >95%, and conformity-index value was >60%. Selected safety characteristics were tested by introducing errors during treatment and testing DDS response. RESULTS Acceptable dosimetric performance and safety characteristics were observed for all treatment plans. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated, for the first time, that a modular prototype system, synchronizing scanned ion beams with moving targets can deliver conformal, motion-compensated dose distributions. The prototype system was implemented and characterized at GSI and CNAO.
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Ooteghem G, Dasnoy-Sumell D, Lee JA, Geets X. Mechanically-assisted and non-invasive ventilation for radiation therapy: A safe technique to regularize and modulate internal tumour motion. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:283-291. [PMID: 31653574 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Current motion mitigation strategies, like margins, gating, and tracking, deal with geometrical uncertainties in the tumour position, induced by breathing during radiotherapy (RT). However, they often overlook motion variability in amplitude, respiratory rate, or baseline position, when breathing spontaneously. Consequently, this may negatively affect the delivered dose conformality in comparison to the plan. We previously demonstrated on volunteers that 3 different modes of mechanically-assisted and non-invasive ventilation (MANIV) may reduce variability in breathing motion. The volume-controlled mode (VC) constraints the amplitude and respiratory rate (RR) in physiologic condition. The shallow-controlled mode (SH), derived from VC, increases the RR and decreases amplitude. The slow-controlled mode (SL) induces repeated breath holds with constrained ventilation pressure. In this study, we compared these mechanical ventilation modes to spontaneous breathing or breath hold and assessed their tolerance and effects on internal tumour motion in patients receiving RT. MATERIAL AND METHODS The VC and SH modes were evaluated in ten patients with lung or liver cancers (cohort A). The SL mode was evaluated in 12 left breast cancer patients (cohort B). After a training and simulation session, the patients underwent 2 MRI sessions to analyze the internal motion of breast and tumour. RESULTS MANIV was well tolerated, without any adverse events or oxymetric changes, even in patients with respiratory comorbidities. In cohort A, when compared to spontaneous breathing (SP), VC reduced significantly inter-session variations of the tumour motion amplitude (p = 0.01), as well as intra- and inter-session variations of the RR (p < 0.05). As to SH, the RR increased, while its variations within and across sessions decreased when compared to SP (p < 0.001). SH reduced the median amplitude of the tumour motion by 6.1 mm or 38.2% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to VC. In cohort B, breast position stability over the end-inspiratory plateaus obtained spontaneously or with SL remained similar. Median duration of the plateaus in SL was 16.6 s. CONCLUSION MANIV is a safe and well tolerated ventilation technique for patients receiving radiotherapy. MANIV could thus make current motion mitigation strategies less critical and more robust. Clinical implementation might be considered, provided the ventilation mode is carefully selected with respect to the treatment indication and patient individualities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geneviève Van Ooteghem
- Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium; Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Damien Dasnoy-Sumell
- Université Catholique de Louvain, ImagX-R, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - John Aldo Lee
- Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Xavier Geets
- Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium; Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Knopf A, Nill S, Yohannes I, Graeff C, Dowdell S, Kurz C, Sonke JJ, Biegun AK, Lang S, McClelland J, Champion B, Fast M, Wölfelschneider J, Gianoli C, Rucinski A, Baroni G, Richter C, van de Water S, Grassberger C, Weber D, Poulsen P, Shimizu S, Bert C. Challenges of radiotherapy: report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2013. Phys Med 2014; 30:809-15. [PMID: 25172392 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.07.341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2014] [Revised: 07/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/28/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This report, compiled by experts on the treatment of mobile targets with advanced radiotherapy, summarizes the main conclusions and innovations achieved during the 4D treatment planning workshop 2013. This annual workshop focuses on research aiming to advance 4D radiotherapy treatments, including all critical aspects of time resolved delivery, such as in-room imaging, motion detection, motion managing, beam application, and quality assurance techniques. The report aims to revise achievements in the field and to discuss remaining challenges and potential solutions. As main achievements advances in the development of a standardized 4D phantom and in the area of 4D-treatment plan optimization were identified. Furthermore, it was noticed that MR imaging gains importance and high interest for sequential 4DCT/MR data sets was expressed, which represents a general trend of the field towards data covering a longer time period of motion. A new point of attention was work related to dose reconstructions, which may play a major role in verification of 4D treatment deliveries. The experimental validation of results achieved by 4D treatment planning and the systematic evaluation of different deformable image registration methods especially for inter-modality fusions were identified as major remaining challenges. A challenge that was also suggested as focus for future 4D workshops was the adaptation of image guidance approaches from conventional radiotherapy into particle therapy. Besides summarizing the last workshop, the authors also want to point out new evolving demands and give an outlook on the focus of the next workshop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Aleksandra K Biegun
- KVI-Center for Advanced Radiation Technology, University of Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Chiara Gianoli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Radiation Oncology Department, SLK-Klinik Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano and Bioengineering Unit, CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Christian Richter
- Oncoray - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital C.G. Carus, TU Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, DKTK, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|