New developments in MRI: System characterization, technical advances and radiotherapy applications

A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation

Imaging biomarkers (IBs) have been proposed in medical literature that exploit images in a quantitative way, going beyond the visual assessment by an imaging physician. These IBs can be used in the diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment of several pathologies and are very often used for patient management pathways. In this respect, IBs to be used in clinical practice and clinical trials have a requirement to be precise, accurate, and reproducible. Due to limitations in imaging technology, an error can be associated with their value when considering the entire imaging chain, from data acquisition to data reconstruction and subsequent analysis. From this point of view, the use of IBs in clinical trials requires a broadening of the concept of quality assurance and this can be a challenge for the responsible medical physics experts (MPEs). Within this manuscript, we describe the concept of an IB, examine some examples of IBs currently employed in clinical practice/clinical trials and analyze the procedure that should be carried out to achieve better accuracy and reproducibility in their use. We anticipate that this narrative review, written by the components of the EFOMP working group on "the role of the MPEs in clinical trials"-imaging sub-group, can represent a valid reference material for MPEs approaching the subject.

The perfect qMR machine: Measurement variance much less than biological variance

Implementing quantitative MR (qMR) methodology can be a time-consuming task, sometimes seemingly without an end. The concept of the Perfect qMR Machine offers the possibility that the implementation is complete and that no further improvements are needed. This is achieved by making the measurement repeatability variance much less than the biological variance. Thus the proposal is: A Perfect Quantitative MR machine is one that, in making a measurement, contributes no significant extra variation to that which already exists from biological variation. A medal system (platinum, gold, silver and bronze) recognises different sources of biological variance, depending on the type of measurement being carried out (whether a serial study or a group comparison), and different kinds of measurement variance (single machine or multi-centre). A perfect machine can in principle be demonstrated for each quantitative measure (T₁, ADC etc).

Clinical translation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers - An overview and gap analysis of current practice

PURPOSE

This overview of the current landscape of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers (qMR IBs) aims to support the standardisation of academic IBs to assist their translation to clinical practice.

METHODS

We used three complementary approaches to investigate qMR IB use and quality management practices within the UK: 1) a literature search of qMR and quality management terms during 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; 2) a database search for clinical research studies using qMR IBs during 2016-2020; and 3) a survey to ascertain the current availability and quality management practices for clinical MRI scanners and associated equipment at research institutions across the UK.

RESULTS

The analysis showed increased use of all qMR methods between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020 and diffusion-tensor MRI and volumetry to be popular methods. However, the "translation ratio" of journal articles to clinical research studies was higher for qMR methods that have evidence of clinical translation via a commercial route, such as fat fraction and T2 mapping. The number of journal articles citing quality management terms doubled between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; although, its proportion relative to all journal articles only increased by 3.0%. The survey suggested that quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) of data acquisition procedures are under-reported in the literature and that QA/QC of acquired data/data analysis are under-developed and lack consistency between institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

We summarise current attempts to standardise and translate qMR IBs, and conclude by outlining the ideal quality management practices and providing a gap analysis between current practice and a metrological standard.

Robustness and reproducibility of radiomics in T2 weighted images from magnetic resonance image guided linear accelerator in a phantom study

PURPOSE

Quantitative radiomics features extracted from medical images have been shown to provide value in predicting clinical outcomes. The study for robustness and reproducibility of radiomics features obtained with magnetic resonance image guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) is insufficient. The objective of this work was to investigate the stability of radiomics features extracted from T2-weighted images of MR-Linac for five common effect factors.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

In this work, ten jellies, five fruits/vegetables, and a dynamic phantom were used to evaluate the impact of test-retest, intraobserver, varied thicknesses, radiation, and motion. These phantoms were scanned on a 1.5 T MRI system of MR-Linac. For test-retest data, the phantoms were scanned twice with repositioning within 15 min. To assess for intraobserver comparison, the segmentation of MR images was repeated by one observer in a double-blind manner. Three slice thicknesses (1.2 mm, 2.4 mm, and 4.8 mm) were used to select robust features that were insensitive to different thicknesses. The effect of radiation on features was studied by acquiring images when the beam was on. Common movement images of patients during radiotherapy were simulated by a dynamic phantom with five motion states to study the motion effect. A total of 1409 radiomics features, including shape features, first-order features, and texture features, were extracted from the original, wavelet, square, logarithmic, exponential and gradient images. The robustness and reproducibility features were evaluated using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

RESULT

The intraobserver group had the most robust features (936/1079, 86.7%), while the group of motion effects had the lowest robustness (56/936, 6.0%), followed by the group of different thickness cohorts (374/936, 40.0%). The stability of features in the test-retest and radiation groups was 1072 of 1312 (81.7%) and 810 of 936 (86.5%), respectively. Overall, 25 of 1409 (2.4%) radiomics features remained robust in all five tests, mostly focusing on the image type of the wavelet. The number of stable features extracted from when the beam was on was less than that extracted when the beam was off. Shape features were the most robust of all of the features in all of the groups, excluding the motion group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other factors fewer features remained robust to the effect of motion. This result emphasizes the need to consider the effect of respiration motion. The study for T2-weighted images from MR-Linac under different conditions will help us to build a robust predictive model applicable for radiotherapy.