Association between labetalol use for hypertension in pregnancy and adverse infant outcomes

Beta-Blockers and Their Current Role in Maternal and Neonatal Health: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Beta-blockers are a class of medications that act on beta-adrenergic receptors and are categorized as cardio-selective and non-selective. They are principally used to treat cardiovascular conditions such as hypertension and arrhythmias. Beta-blockers have also been used to treat non-cardiogenic indications in non-pregnant individuals and the pediatric population. In pregnancy, labetalol is the mainstay treatment for hypertension and other cardiovascular indications. However, contraindications to certain sub-types of beta-blockers include bradycardia, heart failure, obstructive lung diseases, and hemodynamic instability. There is conflicting evidence of the adverse effects on fetal and neonatal health due to a scarce safety and efficacy profile, and further studies are necessary to understand the pharmacokinetics of the different classes of beta-blockers in pregnancy and fetal health. Understanding the hemodynamic changes during the stages of pregnancy is important to target a more beneficial therapy for both mother and fetus as well as better neonatal outcomes. Beta-blocker use in the pediatric population is less documented in studies but does have the potential to treat various cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic conditions. Future comprehensive studies would further benefit the direction of beta-blocker treatment during pregnancy in neonates and pediatrics.

Comparative study of the effect of two different doses of intravenous labetalol on the cardiovascular response to endotracheal extubation

Introduction

Providing a stable hemodynamic in extubation is important. We aimed to compare the effect of two different doses of intravenous labetalol on the cardiovascular response to endotracheal extubation.

Methods

This double-blind randomized trial was performed in 2019-2020 in Isfahan on 72 patients under general anesthesia. Patients using Random Allocation software were divided into three groups and received 0.1 mg/ kg or 0.2 mg/kg labetalol and normal saline intravenously 10 min before extubation. Hemodynamic variables including heart rate (HR), Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and peripheral blood oxygen saturation(SPO2) was measured for each patient before induction of anesthesia and 1, 3, 5 and 10 minutes after extubation.

Results

SBP changes were significantly different between the three groups at 1, 3, 5 minutes after extubation (P=0.036, P=0.009, P=0.005 respectively) unlike the other two groups, patients who received 0.2 mg/kg labetalol did not have an increase in DBP after extubation (P>0.05). DBP was significantly different between the three groups one minute after extubation (P=0.03). At minutes 1 and 3 following extubation, there was a significant difference in the MAP between the three groups. (P=0.029 and P=0.012 respectively). There was no significant difference between the three groups regarding heart rate (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Tracheal extubation is usually associated with an increase in hemodynamic variables. Both doses of labetalol attenuate the hemodynamic response accompanying tracheal extubation. But labetalol 0.2 mg/kg in reducing hemodynamic response to extubation acted more effectively than labetalol 0.1mg/kg.

Anti-hypertensive use for non-severe gestational hypertension in Botswana: A case-control study

OBJECTIVE

The fetal risks and benefits of antihypertensives to treat gestational hypertension in pregnancy are understudied, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS

We performed a nested case-control study within a retrospective cohort of obstetrical patients in Botswana from 2014 to 2019. We included women carrying singletons who developed new onset non-severe hypertension (140-159 mm Hg systolic or 90-109 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure) after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Cases were defined as women with either small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants or stillbirth, analyzed separately; controls were otherwise similar women without the adverse outcome in each analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 1932 cases of SGA (7925 controls) and 316 cases of stillbirth (9619 controls). Cases with SGA were more likely to have used an anti-hypertensive than controls (33% vs 29%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.43). Cases with stillbirth were more likely to have used an anti-hypertensive than controls (42% versus 29%, aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.14-1.83).

CONCLUSION

Anti-hypertensive use for new-onset gestational hypertension was associated with an increased risk of having an SGA infant or a stillbirth among women who never developed severe hypertension. These data support conduct of a randomized clinical trial to determine the appropriate use of anti-hypertensives in non-severe gestational hypertension.

Distinct outcomes of labetalol exposed infants: case reports and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The adverse effects of long-term maternal exposure of labetalol on neonates have been recognized clinically. But there are few systematic studies on their clinical demonstrations and potential mechanisms.

METHODS

A death case of an infant with long-term maternal labetalol exposure was reported and compared with two case reports from the literature. A systematic literature review was carried out followed by a retrospective analysis on neonatal labetalol withdrawal effects.

RESULTS

It was discovered that labetalol withdrawal effects initially cause various degrees of hypotension, hypoglycemia, and bradycardia among exposed neonates. Some life-threatening cases can also occur within 1 week after birth. Long-term maternal exposure of labetalol, preterm infants with birth asphyxia, acidosis, hypoalbuminemia, and cardiac defects are their primary features. Possible mechanisms were concluded as labetalol-induced effects on the vascular and sympathetic nervous system as well as tissue oxygen extraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Neonatal labetalol withdrawal effects include early-onset and late-onset demonstrations, the latter can be life-threatening. A possible mechanism is multiple factors induced imbalance of sympathetic homeostasis increases neonatal vulnerability to common stresses. Long-term exposed preterm infants complicated with asphyxia, acidosis, hypoalbuminemia and cardiac defects, should be provided with intense care during the first week after birth. Further work is necessary to enrich this hypothesis.

Hypertension Canada's 2020 Comprehensive Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children

Hypertension Canada's 2020 guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment of hypertension in adults and children provide comprehensive, evidence-based guidance for health care professionals and patients. Hypertension Canada develops the guidelines using rigourous methodology, carefully mitigating the risk of bias in our process. All draft recommendations undergo critical review by expert methodologists without conflict to ensure quality. Our guideline panel is diverse, including multiple health professional groups (nurses, pharmacy, academics, and physicians), and worked in concert with experts in primary care and implementation to ensure optimal usability. The 2020 guidelines include new guidance on the management of resistant hypertension and the management of hypertension in women planning pregnancy.

Effect of magnesium sulfate combined with labetalol on serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in patients with early-onset severe pre-eclampsia

The aim of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of magnesium sulfate combined with labetalol on the early-onset severe pre-eclampsia (ES-PE) and explore the role of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlT-1), placental growth factor (PlGF), and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the treatment. A total of 164 ES-PE patients admitted to the Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Hubei (Wuhan, China) were assigned to this observational study. Among them, 83 patients were enrolled in group A and treated with magnesium sulfate combined with labetalol hydrochloride, and 81 patients were enrolled in group B and treated with magnesium sulfate. The therapeutic effect, adverse reactions and pregnancy outcomes in the two groups were analyzed. Serum sFlt-1 and PlGF concentrations, before and after treatment, were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of pre-treatment serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the clinical outcome. The effective rate was significantly higher in group A than that in group B. Group A presented superior pregnancy outcomes over group B. The serum sFlt-1 concentration and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment in groups A and B, whereas PlGF concentration was significantly higher after treatment in both groups. After treatment, group A had markedly lower serum sFlt-1 concentration and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio than group B, and markedly higher PlGF concentration than group B. The area under curve (AUC) of serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio before treatment for the prediction of the clinical efficacy was 0.737. In conclusion, magnesium sulfate combined with labetalol could be effectively used for the treatment of ES-PE. The results of ELISA revealed that the balance of sFlT-1 and PlGF was improved after treatment and the sFlT-1/PlGF ratio was decreased. The assessment of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio before treatment was shown to have a certain predictive value for the efficacy of ES-PE treatment.

Comparative efficacy and safety of oral antihypertensive agents in pregnant women with chronic hypertension: a network metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE DATA

Chronic hypertension is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, although the optimal treatment is unclear. The aim of this network metaanalysis was to simultaneously compare the efficacy and safety of antihypertensive agents in pregnant women with chronic hypertension.

STUDY

Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases were searched systematically from inception to December 15, 2019. Both randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were held eligible if they reported the effects of antihypertensive agents on perinatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

The primary outcomes were preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age risk. A frequentist network metaanalytic random-effects model was fitted. The main analysis was based on randomized controlled trials. The credibility of evidence was assessed by taking into account within-study bias, across-studies bias, indirectness, imprecision, heterogeneity, and incoherence.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies (14 randomized controlled trials and 8 cohorts) were included, comprising 4464 women. Pooling of randomized controlled trials indicated that no agent significantly affected the incidence of preeclampsia. Atenolol was associated with significantly higher risk of small-for-gestational age compared with placebo (odds ratio, 26.00; 95% confidence interval, 2.61-259.29) and is ranked as the worst treatment (P-score=.98). The incidence of severe hypertension was significantly lower when nifedipine (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.55), methyldopa (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.56), ketanserin (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.90), and pindolol (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.55) were administered compared with no drug intake. The highest probability scores were calculated for furosemide (P-score=.86), amlodipine (P-score=.82), and placebo (P-score=.82). The use of nifedipine and methyldopa were associated with significantly lower placental abruption rates (odds ratio, 0.29 [95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.58] and 0.23 [95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.46], respectively). No significant differences were estimated for cesarean delivery, perinatal death, preterm birth, and gestational age at delivery.

CONCLUSION

Atenolol was associated with a significantly increased risk for small-for-gestational-age infants. The incidence of severe hypertension was significantly lower when nifedipine and methyldopa were administered, although preeclampsia risk was similar among antihypertensive agents. Future large-scale trials should provide guidance about the choice of antihypertensive treatment and the goal blood pressure during pregnancy.

In Utero Antihypertensive Medication Exposure and Neonatal Outcomes: A Data Linkage Cohort Study

Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy are an important risk to mother and fetus, frequently necessitating antihypertensive treatment. Data describing the safety of in utero exposure to antihypertensive treatment is conflicting, with many studies suffering from significant methodological issues, such as inappropriate study design, small sample sizes, and no untreated control group. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked routinely collected healthcare records for 268 711 children born 2010-2014 in Scotland to assess outcomes following in utero exposure to antihypertensive medication. We identified a cohort of 265 488 eligible children born over the study period; of which, 2350 were exposed to in utero antihypertensive medication, 4391 exposed to treated late-onset hypertension, and 7971 exposed to untreated hypertension during pregnancy. Untreated hypertension was associated with increased risk of preterm birth (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.15 [99% CI, 1.01-1.30]), low birth weight (aRR, 2.01 [99% CI, 1.72-2.36]) and being small for gestational age (aRR, 1.50 [99% CI, 1.35-1.66]), while in utero antihypertensive exposure was also associated with preterm birth (aRR, 3.12 [99% CI, 2.68-3.64]), low birth weight (aRR, 2.23 [99% CI, 1.79-2.78]), and being small for gestational age (aRR, 2.13 [99% CI, 1.81-2.52]). Late-onset hypertension was also associated with preterm birth (aRR, 2.21 [99% CI, 1.86-2.62]), low birth weight (aRR, 2.06 [99% CI, 1.74-2.43]), and being small for gestational age (aRR, 1.90 [99% CI, 1.68-2.16]). Our results suggest that hypertension is a key risk factor for low birth weight and preterm birth. Although preterm birth may be associated with antihypertensive medication exposure during pregnancy, these associations may reflect increasing hypertension severity necessitating treatment.

Hypertension in pregnancy: Pathophysiology and treatment

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, an umbrella term that includes preexisting and gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia, complicate up to 10% of pregnancies and represent a significant cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Despite the differences in guidelines, there appears to be consensus that severe hypertension and non-severe hypertension with evidence of end-organ damage need to be controlled; yet the ideal target ranges below 160/110 mmHg remain a source of debate. This review outlines the definition, pathophysiology, goals of therapy, and treatment agents used in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Review of Cardiovascular Drugs in Pregnancy

Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States. Increasing maternal mortality in the United States underscores the importance of proper cardiovascular management. Significant physiological changes during pregnancy affect the heart's ability to respond to pathological processes such as hypertension and heart failure. These physiological changes further affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of cardiac medications. During pregnancy, these changes can significantly alter medication efficacy and metabolism. This article systematically reviews the literature on safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cardiovascular drugs used for hypertension and heart failure during pregnancy and lactation. The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines recommend transitioning pregnant patients to methyldopa, nifedipine, or labetalol. Heart failure medications, including beta-blockers, furosemide, and digoxin, are relatively safe and can be used effectively. Medications that block the renin angiotensin-aldosterone system have been shown to be beneficial in the general population; however, they are teratogenic and, therefore, contraindicated in pregnancy. Cardiovascular medications can also enter breast milk and, therefore, care must be taken when selecting drugs during the lactation period. A summary of the safety of drugs during pregnancy and lactation from an online resource, LactMed by the National Library of Medicine's TOXNET database, is included. High-risk pregnant patients with cardiovascular disease require a multispecialty team of doctors, including health care providers from obstetrics and gynecology, maternal fetal medicine, internal medicine, cardiovascular disease specialists, and specialized pharmacology expertise.

Pregnancy and Glomerular Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature with Management Guidelines

During pregnancy, CKD increases both maternal and fetal risk. Adverse maternal outcomes include progression of underlying renal dysfunction, worsening of urine protein, and hypertension, whereas adverse fetal outcomes include fetal loss, intrauterine growth restriction, and preterm delivery. As such, pregnancy in young women with CKD is anxiety provoking for both the patient and the clinician providing care, and because the heterogeneous group of glomerular diseases often affects young women, this is an area of heightened concern. In this invited review, we discuss pregnancy outcomes in young women with glomerular diseases. We have performed a systematic review in attempt to better understand these outcomes among young women with primary GN, we review the studies of pregnancy outcomes in lupus nephritis, and finally, we provide a potential construct for management. Although it is safe to say that the vast majority of young women with glomerular disease will have a live birth, the counseling that we can provide with respect to individualized risk remains imprecise in primary GN because the existing literature is extremely dated, and all management principles are extrapolated primarily from studies in lupus nephritis and diabetes. As such, the study of pregnancy outcomes and management strategies in these rare diseases requires a renewed interest and a dedicated collaborative effort.

In-utero exposure to antihypertensive medication and neonatal and child health outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although medication is generally avoided wherever possible during pregnancy, pharmacotherapy is required for the treatment of pregnancy associated hypertension, which remains a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The long-term effects to the child of in-utero exposure to antihypertensive agents remains largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically review published studies on adverse outcomes to the child associated with in-utero exposure to antihypertensive medications.

METHODS

OVID, Scopus, EBSCO Collections, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant publications published between January 1950 and October 2016 and a total of 688 potentially eligible studies were identified.

RESULTS

Following review, 47 primary studies were eligible for inclusion. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to assess study quality. Five studies were of excellent quality; the remainder were either mediocre or poor. Increased risk of low birth weight, low size for gestational age, preterm birth, and congenital defects following in-utero exposure to all antihypertensive agents were identified. Two studies reported an increased risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder following exposure to labetalol, and an increased risk of sleep disorders following exposure to methyldopa and clonidine.

CONCLUSION

The current systematic review demonstrates a paucity of relevant published high-quality studies. A small number of studies suggest possible increased risk of adverse child health outcomes; however, most published studies have methodological weaknesses and/or lacked statistical power thus preventing any firm conclusions being drawn.

Hypertension in CKD Pregnancy: a Question of Cause and Effect (Cause or Effect? This Is the Question)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly encountered in pregnancy, and hypertension is frequently concomitant. In pregnancy, the prevalence of CKD is estimated to be about 3%, while the prevalence of chronic hypertension is about 5-8%. The prevalence of hypertension and CKD in pregnancy is unknown. Both are independently related to adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the clinical picture merges with pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia. Precise risk quantification is not available, but risks linked to CKD stage, hypertension, and proteinuria are probably multiplicative, each at least doubling the rates of preterm and early preterm delivery, small for gestational age babies, and related outcomes. Differential diagnosis (based upon utero-placental flows, fetal growth, and supported by serum biomarkers) is important for clinical management. In the absence of guidelines for hypertension in CKD pregnancies, the ideal blood pressure goal has not been established; we support a tailored approach, depending on compliance, baseline control, and CKD stages, with strict blood pressure monitoring. The choice of antihypertensive drugs and the use of diuretics and of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are still open questions which only future studies may clarify.

Successful prevention of preeclampsia in a high-risk pregnancy using progestogen dydrogesterone: a clinical case

The presented clinical example convincingly demonstrates the efficacy of dydrogesterone (30 mg) in the prevention of severe preeclampsia in a high-risk patient (early development of preeclampsia and preterm Cesarean section in her first pregnancy, arterial hypertension). This case suggests using dydrogesterone as an option to prevent preeclampsia, as previously shown in a prospective randomized study.

A review of oral labetalol and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in pregnancy

Hypertension is the most commonly encountered medical condition in pregnancy, contributing significantly to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Mild to moderate hypertension in pregnancy is defined as systolic blood pressure of 140-159 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of 90-109 mmHg (7-9% of pregnancies). When treating hypertension in pregnancy, not only do physiologic changes of pregnancy have an effect on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs used, but the pathophysiology of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy also have an effect. To date, evidence is lacking on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of commonly used antihypertensive drugs, which often times leads to suboptimal treatment of hypertensive pregnant women. When considering which agents to use for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension, specifically in gestational and chronic hypertension, oral labetalol and nifedipine are valid options. An overview of the profile for use, safety, and current pharmacokinetic data for each agent is presented here.

Do labetalol and methyldopa have different effects on pregnancy outcome? Analysis of data from the Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcomes, accounting for allocated group, between methyldopa-treated and labetalol-treated women in the CHIPS Trial (ISRCTN 71416914) of 'less tight' versus 'tight' control of pregnancy hypertension.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of CHIPS Trial cohort.

SETTING

International randomised controlled trial (94 sites, 15 countries).

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

Of 987 CHIPS recruits, 481/566 (85.0%) women treated with antihypertensive therapy at randomisation. Of 981 (99.4%) women followed to delivery, 656/745 (88.1%) treated postrandomisation.

METHODS

Logistic regression to compare outcomes among women who took methyldopa or labetalol, adjusted for the influence of baseline factors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CHIPS primary (perinatal loss or high level neonatal care for >48 hours) and secondary (serious maternal complications) outcomes, birthweight <10th centile, severe maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia and delivery at <34 or <37 weeks.

RESULTS

Methyldopa and labetalol were used commonly at randomisation (243/987, 24.6% and 238/987, 24.6%, respectively) and post-randomisation (224/981, 22.8% and 433/981, 44.1%, respectively). Following adjusted analyses, methyldopa (versus labetalol) at randomisation was associated with fewer babies with birthweight <10th centile [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.48; 95% CI 0.20-0.87]. Methyldopa (versus labetalol) postrandomisation was associated with fewer CHIPS primary outcomes (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.40-1.00), birthweight <10th centile (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.32-0.92), severe hypertension (aOR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.83), pre-eclampsia (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.85), and delivery at <34 weeks (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.96) or <37 weeks (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.85).

CONCLUSION

These nonrandomised comparisons are subject to residual confounding, but women treated with methyldopa (versus labetalol), particularly those with pre-existing hypertension, may have had better outcomes.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

There was no evidence that women treated with methyldopa versus labetalol had worse outcomes.