Skin closure methods after single port laparoscopic surgery: a randomized clinical trial

Feasibility of an improved knotless method of chest drain wound closure:a prospective cohort clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Chest tube management plays a key role in minimising erioperative period. We have improved the knotless method to chest tube wounds. In this article, we demonstrate the clinical bility and safety of this method.

METHOD

From 13 October 2018-3 January 2019, patients were ecutively included in our study at the First Affiliated Hospital of n Medical University, Dalian, China. They were separated into approximately equally sized groups-the knotless group and the entional group. Our improved knotless method was performed ose the chest tube wounds of patients in the knotless group, and onventional method using the pre-existing U-shaped string to the chest tube wounds of patients in the conventional group. Patient clinical information, tube-related complications, retreatment s and cosmetic scores were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 102 patients; 47 in the knotless group and 55 in the conventional group. There were no statistically significant differences in patient clinical information or tube-related complications between the two groups (p>0.05; both comparisons). In the knotless group, retreatment times were shorter (p<0.001) and cosmetic scores were higher (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that our new knotless method is safe and has wide clinical feasibility. The new method also improved patient cosmetic scores. Furthermore, it decreased the patients' economic burdens.

Comparative study of K-wire combined with screw vs. K-wire in the treatment of AO type B3.1 phalangeal fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to introduce the surgical method of K-wire combined with screw in the treatment of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen (AO) type B3.1 phalangeal fractures and to compare its clinical, radiological and functional outcomes with K-wire fixation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative study. From January 2015 to February 2022, we treated 86 patients with AO type B3.1 phalangeal fractures. A total of 71 patients were finally included in the statistical analysis. Thirty-nine patients received K-wires combined with screw, and 32 patients received simple K-wires. The follow-up time was at least 6 months. Outcome measures included general information, operative time, total active motion (TAM), pinch strength, radiological union time, pain assessed by visual analog scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, cost, and complications.

RESULTS

The follow-up time was 6-12 months, with an average of 7.9 months. All patients achieved clinical and radiological union. Compared with the K-wire fixation group, the TAM, radiological union time and VAS score of the K-wire combined with screw group had obvious advantages. Compared with the opposite healthy hand, the grip strength of the two groups was similar, and there was no significant difference in the QuickDASH score. The incidence rate of complications in the K-wire combined with screw group (2/39) was lower than that in the K-wire fixation group (7/32).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with simple K-wire fixation, K-wire combined with screw in the treatment of AO type B3.1 phalangeal fractures is a safer and reliable surgical method. K-wire controls the rotation and plays a role similar to a "lock". The screw can exert pressure and fix it more firmly. It shortens the time of fracture healing and has a higher TAM and fewer postoperative complications.

Punch Incision versus Elliptical Excision for Epidermal Inclusion Cysts: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Punch incision is an alternative to elliptical excision for treating epidermal inclusion cysts, but its efficacy has not been systematically reviewed. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of punch incision versus elliptical excision for epidermal inclusion cysts. Randomized controlled trials published through January 2021 that evaluated the performance of punch incision versus elliptical excision on epidermal inclusion cysts were identified through electronic databases and clinical registries. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials tool was used. Review Manager software was used for the meta-analysis. Two trials (100 participants) were identified. The primary outcomes were recurrence rate (risk ratio, 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37–15.60 [favoring elliptical excision]), mean operative time (mean difference [MD], −5.28; 95% CI, −12.72 to 2.16 [favoring punch incision]), and mean postoperative wound length (MD, −11.67; 95% CI, −20.59 to −2.76 [favoring punch incision]). The evidence was low to moderate due to the small sample size and its considerable heterogeneity. The use of punch incision shortened the mean postoperative wound length and had comparable safety to that of elliptical excision.

Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation

The objective of this report was to introduce a new suture augmentation of coracoclavicular (CC) and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute Rockwood grade III to V acromioclavicular dislocations.From January 2015 to January 2019, 43 patients with Rockwood III to VI acute acromioclavicular dislocations were retrospectively reviewed. For comparison, another series of 28 patients treated with double Endobutton technique from January 2011 to December 2014 were reviewed. A P < .05 was considered statistical significance.The mean follow-up period of the 2 series were 39.69 ± 7.42 months (range, 24-54 months) and 37.86 ± 8.23 months (range, 26-48 months) (P > .05), respectively. There were significant differences regarding CC space (11.62 ± 2.54 mm vs 16.78 ± 5.53 mm; P < .05), CC reduction loss (5.56 ± 4.73 mm vs 26.25 ± 4.42 mm; P < .05), and acromioclavicular space (6.89 ± 1.87 mm vs 7.95 ± 2.37 mm; P < .05). There were significant differences regarding the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (3.3 ± 2.8 vs 5.32 ± 4.37; P < .05) and University of California-Los Angeles shoulder rating scale (31.19 ± 2.48 vs 29.24 ± 2.48; P < .05). The excellent to good percentages were 100% (n = 32) and 85% (n = 23), respectively.In conclusion, the suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and CC ligament reconstruction is a reliable technique for acute acromioclavicular dislocation with minimal complications.Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IIa.

Percutaneous reduction and fixation technique for 4th metacarpal shaft fracture

The objective of this retrospective study was to introduce a percutaneous reduction and intermetacarpal K-wire fixation technique for the treatment of the 4th metacarpal shaft fracture. From January 2014 to February 2017, 25 patients with isolated closed 4th metacarpal shaft fracture (angulation > 30°, rotation > 5°, or shortening > 5 mm) were treated by percutaneous reduction and internal fixation. Assessment comprised total active motion, grip strength, dorsal prominence, and patient satisfaction. Bone healing was achieved in all patients. At a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 25-32 months), total active range of motion averaged 98% of contralateral values (range, 88%-100%). There were 20 excellent and 5 good results. Grip strength averaged 97% of contralateral values (range, 88%-100%). Mean dorsal prominence on a 100-mm visual analogue scale was 0 (range, 0-1). Mean satisfaction rating on the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction 26 (range, 22-28). Percutaneous reduction and intermetacarpal K-wire fixation is a useful technique for treating 4th metacarpal shaft fracture, achieving stable and reliable fixation, with good hand function.

Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery

BACKGROUND

Following surgery, surgical wounds can be closed using a variety of devices including sutures (subcuticular or transdermal), staples and tissue adhesives. Subcuticular sutures are intradermal stitches (placed immediately below the epidermal layer). The increased availability of synthetic absorbable filaments (stitches which are absorbed by the body and do not have to be removed) has led to an increased use of subcuticular sutures. However, in non-obstetric surgery, there is still controversy about whether subcuticular sutures increase the incidence of wound complications.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy and acceptability of subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

In March 2019, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials which compared subcuticular sutures with any other methods for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery were included in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified the trials, extracted data and carried out risk of bias and GRADE assessment of the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 66 studies (7487 participants); 11 included trials had more than two arms. Most trials had poorly-reported methodology, meaning that it is unclear whether they were at high risk of bias. Most trials compared subcuticular sutures with transdermal sutures, skin staples or tissue adhesives. Most outcomes prespecified in the review protocol were reported. The certainty of evidence varied from high to very low in the comparisons of subcuticular sutures with transdermal sutures or staples and tissue adhesives; the certainty of the evidence for the comparison with surgical tapes and zippers was low to very low. Most evidence was downgraded for imprecision or risk of bias. Although the majority of studies enrolled people who underwent CDC class 1 (clean) surgeries, two-thirds of participants were enrolled in studies which included CDC class 2 to 4 surgeries, such as appendectomies and gastrointestinal surgeries. Most participants were adults in a hospital setting. Subcuticular sutures versus transdermal sutures There may be little difference in the incidence of SSI (risk ratio (RR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 1.52; 3107 participants; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether subcuticular sutures reduce wound complications (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.71; 1489 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Subcuticular sutures probably improve patient satisfaction (score from 1 to 10) (at 30 days; MD 1.60, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.88; 290 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Wound closure time is probably longer when subcuticular sutures are used (MD 5.81 minutes; 95% CI 5.13 to 6.49 minutes; 585 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Subcuticular sutures versus skin staples There is moderate-certainty evidence that, when compared with skin staples, subcuticular sutures probably have little effect on SSI (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.01; 4163 participants); but probably decrease the incidence of wound complications (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.98; 2973 participants). Subcuticular sutures are associated with slightly higher patient satisfaction (score from 1 to 5) (MD 0.20, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.30; 1232 participants; high-certainty evidence). Wound closure time may also be longer compared with staples (MD 0.30 to 5.50 minutes; 1384 participants; low-certainty evidence). Subcuticular sutures versus tissue adhesives, surgical tapes and zippers There is moderate-certainty evidence showing no clear difference in the incidence of SSI between participants treated with subcuticular sutures and those treated with tissue adhesives (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.45; 869 participants). There is also no clear difference in the incidence of wound complications (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.11; 1058 participants; low-certainty evidence). Subcuticular sutures may also achieve lower patient satisfaction ratings (score from 1 to 10) (MD -2.05, 95% CI -3.05 to -1.05; 131 participants) (low-certainty evidence). In terms of SSI incidence, the evidence is uncertain when subcuticular sutures are compared with surgical tapes (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.40 to 4.27; 354 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or surgical zippers (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.08 to 8.48; 424 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There may be little difference in the incidence of wound complications between participants treated with subcuticular sutures and those treated with surgical tapes (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.34; 492 participants; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether subcuticular sutures reduce the risk of wound complications compared with surgical zippers (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.04; 424 participants; very low-certainty evidence). It is also uncertain whether it takes longer to close a wound with subcuticular sutures compared with tissue adhesives (MD -0.34 to 10.39 minutes; 895 participants), surgical tapes (MD 0.74 to 6.36 minutes; 169 participants) or zippers (MD 4.38 to 8.25 minutes; 424 participants) (very low-certainty evidence). No study reported results for patient satisfaction compared with surgical tapes or zippers.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear difference in the incidence of SSI for subcuticular sutures in comparison with any other skin closure methods. Subcuticular sutures probably reduce wound complications compared with staples, and probably improve patient satisfaction compared with transdermal sutures or staples. However, tissue adhesives may improve patient satisfaction compared with subcuticular sutures, and transdermal sutures and skin staples may be quicker to apply than subcuticular sutures. The quality of the evidence ranged from high to very low; evidence for almost all comparisons was subject to some limitations. There seems to be no need for additional new trials to explore the comparison with staples because there are high-quality studies with large sample sizes and some ongoing studies. However, there is a need for studies exploring the comparisons with transdermal sutures, tissue adhesives, tapes and zippers, with high-quality studies and large sample sizes, including long-term assessments.

A randomized comparison of bone-cement K-wire fixation vs. plate fixation of shaft fractures of proximal phalanges

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03031015) is to compare the treatments of hand proximal phalanx shaft fractures with external-fixation technique using the combination of K-wires and bone-cement vs. open reduction and internal fixation technique using a miniature plate-and-screw system.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients (134 cases) were randomly allocated to group A (67 cases in 56 patients) and B (64 cases in 51 patients). Fingers in group A were treated with bone-cement K-wire fixation, and fingers in group B were treated using a plate-and-screw system.

RESULTS

Follow-ups lasted 2 years. In group A, active range of motion of proximal interphalangeal joint reached 93% ± 6.7% of the opposite fingers. In group B, the data reached 86% ± 14.4% of the opposite fingers. Based on total active motion scoring system, we obtained 21 excellent and 46 good results in group A; and 9 excellent, 50 good, and 5 fair results in group B. There was a significant difference with regards to the function of the fingers (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The bone-cement K-wire fixation may be another option for the treatment of shaft fractures of proximal phalanges. The minimally invasive technique allows early joint motion, resulting in minimal complications and good functional recovery.

Umbilical Quilting Suture Technique during Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery

Background and Objectives

Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is popular in the gynecological field, because it is less invasive and leaves a smaller scar. However, the postoperative shape of the umbilicus is often distorted due to the intensive procedures performed through the small opening. In this report, we describe a technique for forming a satisfactory umbilicus in SPLS.

Methods

From March 2016 through April 2017, 32 patients were treated with SPLS by a single gynecologic surgeon. Group A (14 cases) underwent conventional umbilicus closure, and group B (18 cases) underwent a quilting suture technique. The umbilical shapes of each group were assessed by a plastic surgeon as was the patients' satisfaction. Evaluations were performed immediately after surgery and every month for 6 months thereafter.

Results

The postoperative umbilical shape in group A showed features, such as loss of depression, disappearance of the central vertical line, and irregularly bulging tissue, whereas group B had a shape similar to that of the natural umbilicus and maintained its depression and vertical line. The average scores of the plastic surgeons' evaluations immediately after the operation were 10.4 for group A and 15.1 for group B. The final scores obtained 6 months after surgery were 15.2 and 17.8, respectively. The patients' satisfaction scores immediately after the operation were 4.9 for group A and 7.3 for group B. The scores increased gradually, to 8.1 and 9.2, respectively, at 6 months after surgery.

Conclusion

Performing quilting sutures during wound closure in SPLS is effective for making an ideal umbilicus and ensuring patients' satisfaction.

Cemented K-wire fixation for the treatment of shaft fractures of middle phalanges

BACKGROUND

The objective of this report is to introduce an external-fixation technique using the combination of K-wires and cement.

METHODS

From February 2009 to January 2015, 51 patients with shaft fractures of middle phalanges were treated with cemented K-wire fixation. The mean age of patients at surgery was 41 years. The mean time interval from injury to operation was 6±5.78days. Injured digits included index (n=18), long (n=15), ring (n=7), and little (n=11) fingers. Types of fractures were transversal (n=32), short oblique or spiral (n=5), and comminuted (n=14) fractures. Active range of motion of the fingers was measured. Total active motion was scored based on the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All measurements were compared with those on the opposite fingers. Patients also reported on their satisfaction using the 100-mm visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

At the final follow-ups of 2 years, range of motion of metacarpophalangeal joint, proximal phalangeal joint, and distal interphalangeal joint reached 97%±2.88, 93%±6.65, and 96%±3.22 of the opposite fingers, respectively. Based on Total active motion scoring system, we obtained 36 excellent and 15 good results. Based on VAS, patient satisfaction was 96±3.44.

CONCLUSIONS

The cemented K-wire fixation is a reliable technique for the treatment of shaft fractures of middle phalanges. The technique is a minimally invasive procedure with minimal complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level IVa.

A Randomized Comparison of Double Small, Standard, and Endoscopic Approaches for Carpal Tunnel Release

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to introduce a new surgical technique of carpal tunnel release through double small incisions, and to compare the technique with the standard open release and endoscopic release.

METHODS

Two hundred and seven patients were allocated randomly into group A (n = 73), B (n = 65), or C (n = 69). Patients in group A were treated with carpal tunnel release by means of double small incisions. Patients in group B were treated by means of the standard incision. Patients in group C had endoscopic release.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the mean severity of symptoms of groups A, B, and C was 3.7 ± 0.58, 3.8 ± 0.62, and 3.7 ± 0.52, respectively; and the mean functional status was 3.2 ± 0.71, 3.2 ± 0.71, and 3.5 ± 0.64, respectively. At the final follow-up of 3 years, the mean severity of symptoms of the groups was 1.2 ± 0.45, 1.2 ± 0.31, and 1.5 ± 0.36, respectively; and the mean functional status was 1.2 ± 0.38, 1.2 ± 0.41, and 1.5 ± 0.42, respectively. Patient satisfaction was 95 ± 4.2, 90 ± 5.8, and 93 ± 4.4, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups regarding symptom severity or function status (p > 0.05). For scar appearance, there were significant differences between groups A and B and between B and C, but not between A and C; for patient satisfaction, there were significant differences in all comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Carpal tunnel release by means of double small incisions is a minimally invasive and less technically challenging procedure with good nerve visualization, resulting in good appearance of scars.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

A minimally invasive approach for cubital tunnel release and ulnar nerve transposition

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to introduce a new minimally invasive technique for ulnar nerve release and transposition.

METHODS

From January 2010 to May 2011, 51 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome were treated through a 1.5 to 2 cm incision. Limb functional recovery, scar esthetics, sensitivity of scar, numbness of the operating area, and patient satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

No wound hematoma nor infection was observed in the group. The time of operation was 36 ± 17.2 minutes. At the final follow-up of 63 ± 7.3 months, 2-point discrimination of the small finger was improved from 6.3 ± 2.2 mm to 5.2 ± 2.4 mm. Grip and pinch strength of the hand were improved from 14.2 ± 7.7 kg and 3.7 ± 2.4 kg to 35.2 ± 12.7 kg and 4.1 ± 2.8 kg, respectively. The motor nerve conduction velocity was improved from 36.5 ± 11.2 to 44.6 ± 6.7 (m/sec). The Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand questionnaire score was improved from 37.2 ± 23.8 to 10.5 ± 9.6. No patients reported scar pain, sensitivity of scar, or numbness of the operating area. No revision surgery was needed. Michigan Hand Outcome score for aesthetics was 94.6%±5.1 and satisfaction was 92 ± 8, respectively. We obtained 33 excellent, 12 good, 5 fair, and 1 poor result.

CONCLUSION

Ulnar nerve decompression with anterior transposition can be safely and effectively accomplished through the small incision. It can be an alternative technique producing good appearance.

Modified Hotz Procedure Combined With Modified Z-Epicanthoplasty Versus Modified Hotz Procedure Alone for Epiblepharon Repair

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of the modified Hotz procedure alone and combined with modified Z-epicanthoplasty for correction of epiblepharon.

METHODS

Seventy-one Chinese patients who underwent epiblepharon repair were divided into 2 groups. In group 1, 33 patients (59 eyes) were operated on with the modified Hotz procedure. In group 2, 38 patients (71 eyes) were operated on with the modified Hotz procedure combined with modified Z-epicanthoplasty. Treatment outcomes were classified as "excellent" with no cilium-ocular surface touching, "fair" with 5 or fewer cilia-ocular surface touchings, and "poor" with more than 5 cilia-ocular surface touchings. Incision scars were evaluated by the Vancouver scar scale (VSS).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the age or sex distribution between the two groups. For group 1, the outcome was excellent for 46 eyes (78%) and fair or poor for 13 eyes (22%). For group 2, the outcome was excellent for 70 eyes (98.6%) and fair for only 1 eye (1.4%). Thus, group 2 had significantly more excellent outcomes compared with group 1 (p < 0.001). The Vancouver scar scale of the lower eyelids in group 1 was 1.10 ± 0.30 and 1.04 ± 0.20 in group 2 after correcting for the follow-up period (p = 0.292). The medial canthus Vancouver scar scale in group 2 was 1.13 ± 0.37, which was not different from the lower eyelid Vancouver scar scale (p = 0.471).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Hotz procedure combined with modified Z-epicanthoplasty is more effective in correcting lower eyelid epiblepharon than the modified Hotz procedure alone. The combined procedure does not produce obvious lower eyelid or medial canthus scars.