Survival impact of capsule status in stage I ovarian mucinous carcinoma-A mulicentric retrospective study

Outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery of early-stage ovarian cancer: A nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is an alternative choice of young patients who have not completed their family planning and still have fertility needs. The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients undergoing FSS and radical comprehensive staging surgery (RCS), and the suitability of FSS.

METHODS

A total of 1297 patients aged between 20 and 44 years with newly diagnosed early-stage EOC were recruited from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database between 2009 and 2017. Site-specific surgery codes were used to distinguish patients in FSS group or RCS group. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test and Cox regression model.

RESULTS

There were 401 and 896 patients in FSS and RCS group. Patients in FSS group were with younger age and mostly had Stage I disease. In contrast, patients in RCS group were older. There were more Stage II, high-grade (Grade 3) disease, and adjuvant chemotherapy in RCS group. Stage and tumor grade were two independent factors correlating with CSS and the type of surgery showed no effect on CSS (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.66-1.77, p = 0.73) in multivariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, the clear cell carcinoma group who underwent FSS demonstrated better CSS compared to those in the RCS group (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.06-0.82, p = 0.04). A total of 17 women who underwent FSS developed second malignancies of the uterine corpus or contralateral ovary.

CONCLUSION

FSS can be a safe alternative procedure in selected young patients of Stage I EOC who have fertility desire. Endometrial biopsy before or during FSS and regular surveillance to detect recurrence are mandatory for ovarian cancer patients undergoing FSS.

Update on Prognostic and Predictive Markers in Mucinous Ovarian Cancer

This review includes state-of-the-art prognostic and predictive factors of mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC), a rare tumor. Clinical, pathological, and molecular features and treatment options according to prognosis are comprehensively discussed. Different clinical implications of MOC are described according to the The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage: early MOC (stage I-II) and advanced MOC (stage III-IV). Early MOC is characterized by a good prognosis. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Fertility-sparing surgery could be performed in patients who wish to become pregnant and that present low recurrence risk of disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended, except in patients with high-risk clinical and pathological features. Regarding the histological features, an infiltrative growth pattern is the major prognostic factor of MOC. Furthermore, novel molecular biomarkers are emerging for tailored management of early-stage MOC. In contrast, advanced MOC is characterized by poor survival. Radical surgery is the cornerstone of treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended, although the efficacy is limited by the intrinsic chemoresistance of these tumors. Several molecular hallmarks of advanced MOC have been described in recent years (e.g., HER2 amplification, distinct methylation profiles, peculiar immunological microenvironment), but target therapy for these rare tumors is not available yet.

Is There a Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IC1 Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients? A Meta-Analysis

The purpose of the present systematic review is to clarify whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival rates in women with stage IC1 ovarian cancer. We searched Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar. We considered comparative observational studies and randomized trials that investigated survival outcomes (progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) among women with intraoperative rupture of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those that did not. Eleven studies, which recruited 7556 patients, were included. The risk of bias was defined as moderate after assessment with the Risk of Bias in non-Randomized Trials tool. Meta-analysis was performed with RStudio. Seven studies investigated the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence-free survival of patients experiencing intraoperative cyst rupture for otherwise stage I ovarian cancer. The outcome was not affected by the use of adjuvant chemotherapy as the effect estimate was not significant (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.74, 2.04). The analysis of data from 5 studies similarly revealed that overall survival rates were comparable among the two groups (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54, 1.05). This meta-analysis did not detect any benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IC ovarian cancer patients with cyst rupture. However, conclusions from this investigation are limited by a study population which included multiple histologic subtypes, high and low grade tumors and incompletely staged patients.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy May Not Be Necessary for Women with Stage IC1 Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognoses in women with stage IC1 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

All eligible women diagnosed with stage IC1 EOC from 2003 to 2019 in Tongji Hospital were included. Patient characteristics, tumor features, surgical types, and chemotherapeutic treatments were collected. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 140 patients (median age: 47 years old), 13 patients did not receive chemotherapy, and 127 received adjuvant chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy offered no obvious improvements in PFS or OS. Subgroup analysis was conducted to adjust for the significant difference in incomplete staging surgery between the two groups, and chemotherapy still showed no benefit for survival. Cox regression analysis indicated that incomplete staging surgery was a risk factor for a worse PFS and that adjuvant chemotherapy remained unrelated to the prognosis. The patients were further divided based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations: patients for whom observation is optional and chemotherapy would not improve the prognosis; and patients for whom chemotherapy is recommended. The results showed that postoperative chemotherapy had little correlation with survival.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that postoperative chemotherapy may be unnecessary for patients with stage IC1 EOC. According to our results, incomplete staging surgery is a significant risk factor for PFS.

Intraoperative Rupture of the Ovarian Capsule in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of intraoperative ovarian capsule rupture on progression-free survival and overall survival in women who are undergoing surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE using PubMed, EMBASE (Elsevier), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus (Elsevier) were searched from inception until August 11, 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

High-quality studies reporting survival outcomes comparing ovarian capsule rupture to no capsule rupture among patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent surgical management were abstracted. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and studies with scores of at least 7 points were included.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The data were extracted independently by multiple observers. Random-effects models were used to pool associations and to analyze the association between ovarian capsule rupture and oncologic outcomes. Seventeen studies met all the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Twelve thousand seven hundred fifty-six (62.6%) patients did not have capsule rupture and had disease confined to the ovary on final pathology; 5,532 (33.7%) patients had intraoperative capsule rupture of an otherwise early-stage ovarian cancer. Patients with intraoperative capsule rupture had worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.34-2.76, P<.001), with moderate heterogeneity (I2=41%, P=.07) when compared with those without capsule rupture. Pooled results from these studies showed a worse overall survival (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.15-1.91, P=.003), with moderate heterogeneity (I2=53%, P=.02) when compared with patients without intraoperative capsule rupture. This remained significant in a series of sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality observational studies shows that intraoperative ovarian capsule rupture results in decreased progression-free survival and overall survival in women with early-stage ovarian cancer who are undergoing initial surgical management.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021216561.

Laparoscopic management of a giant mucinous benign ovarian mass weighing 10150 grams: A case report

BACKGROUND

Giant ovarian cysts (≥ 15 cm in diameter) are rare. The size limit of cysts and the methodology for a safe and successful minimally invasive surgery has not been established. Here we report a case of a large 10-kg multi-locular ovarian mass, which was successfully laparoscopically removed: Our aim was to innovate the surgical practice in this field by providing a safe, effective, and minimally invasive management method for such complex and rare cases.

CASE SUMMARY

A 49-year-old nulliparous woman presented with abdominal distension, lasting from six Mo prior to admission; she reported worsening abdominal pain, abdominal swelling, and mild dyspnea. Imaging showed a presumed benign multi-locular (> 10 locules) left ovarian cyst that measured about 30 cm in diameter. Based on the IOTA-ADNEX model the mass had a 27.5% risk of being a borderline or malignant tumor. The patient was successfully treated via a direct laparoscopic approach with salpingo-oophorectomy, followed by the external drainage of the cyst. Tumor spillage was successfully avoided during this procedure. The final volume of the drained mucinous content was 8950 L; the cyst wall, extracted through the minilaparotomy, weighed about 1200 g. The pathologic gross examination revealed a 24 cm × 15 cm × 10 cm mass; the histologic examination diagnosed a mucinous cystoadenoma. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a giant multi-locular ovarian cyst treated with a direct laparoscopy with salpingo-oophorectomy followed by external decompression.

CONCLUSION

Choosing the appropriate technique and surgeon skill are necessary for a safe and effective minimally-invasive approach of unique cases involving giant ovarian cysts.

Is standard radical surgery necessary for elderly patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma? ~Propensity score matched analysis~

OBJECTIVE

The impact of 'standard full-staged radical surgery (SRS)' on overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. In the current study, we investigated the impact of SRS on OS in elderly patients with early-stage EOC in a multicentric analysis using a propensity score (PS)-matching technique.

METHODS

Between 1986 and 2017, 3227 patients with EOC were registered and accumulated by the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group, consisting of 14 collaborating institutions, after a central pathological review. Among them, 204 elderly patients aged older than or equal to 65 years who had a stage I EOC were analyzed, including 72 patients who had received SRS (Group I) and 132 who had undergone non-SRS limited surgery (Group II). Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups using a PS-matching technique to adjust for various clinicopathologic risk factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration of all surviving patients was 55.9 months. Consequently, 54 patients (26.5%) developed recurrence. In addition, 33 patients (16.2%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, the 5-year OS rates of Groups I and II were 95.8 and 82.3%, respectively. We identified a marginally significant difference between the two groups (Log-rank: P = 0.086). In the PS-matched cohort after adjustment for multiple clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups [OS (Group I vs. II), HR: 0.766 (95% CI: 0.271-2.165), P = 0.615].

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment for clinicopathologic factors, non-SRS limited surgery may not worsen the oncologic outcome in elderly women with early-stage EOC. A large-scale clinical study is necessary to validate the findings.

Survival after Anticancer Treatment of Terminally Ill Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma

Background: It remains unclear whether the end-of-life (EOL) treatment/environment impacts on survival after anticancer treatment in terminally ill women with ovarian carcinoma (OC). Objective: The aim of this investigation was to clarify how long those women actually survived after their last anticancer treatments and their hallmarks. Setting, Design, and Measurements: Between 2003 and 2011, 79 terminally ill women with OC were retrospectively analyzed as a single institutional study. Postcancer treatment survival (PCS), defined as the duration between the last date of the abovementioned "cancer treatment" and that of death from any cause, was analyzed on stratification by type of supportive care or where patients spend their EOL. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed to compare PCS between the two groups. Results: The median PCS of patients was 10.8 weeks. In the multivariable analysis, the performance status and EOL place retained their significance as independent prognostic factors of poorer PCS (performance status [2-3/0-1]: hazard ratio [HR] = 3.279 [95% confidence interval; CI 1.967-5.586; p < 0.0001], EOL place [hospital/home hospice]: HR = 0.574 [95% CI 0.355-0.913; p = 0.0188]). In the IPTW-adjusted cohort, the median PCS rates were 15.0 and 9.7 weeks in patients of home/hospice and hospital groups, respectively (p = 0.04). Also in the IPTW cohort, the EOL place retained its significance (IPTW-adjusted: HR [95% CI]: 1.548 [1.009-2.374], p = 0.045, multivariable adjusted with IPTW: HR [95% CI]: 1.670 [1.077-2.588], p = 0.022). Conclusion: Our current data may be hypothesis generating; it is possible that the EOL environment is a crucial prognostic factor for survival after anticancer treatment.

Intraoperative Capsule Rupture, Postoperative Chemotherapy, and Survival of Women With Stage I Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

The incidence and prognostic significance of intraoperative capsule rupture in apparent stage IA-B ovarian cancer varies across histologies, and postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival.

To examine the incidence and prognostic effects of intraoperative capsule rupture and to assess the effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy for intraoperative tumor rupture in apparent stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.

Mucinous Cancer of the Ovary: Overview and Current Status

Mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Whereas all EOC subtypes are addressed in the same way, MOC is a distinct entity. Appreciating the pathological features and genomic profile of MOC may result in the improvement in management and, hence, the prognosis. Distinguishing primary MOC from metastatic mucinous carcinoma can be challenging but is essential. Early-stage MOC carries an excellent prognosis, with advanced disease having a poor outcome. Surgical management plays an essential role in the early stage and in metastatic disease. Chemotherapy is usually administered for stage II MOC and beyond. The standard gynecology protocol is frequently used, but gastrointestinal regimens have also been administered. As MOC is associated with multiple molecular alterations, targeted therapy could be the answer to treat this disease.

Effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy for stage IC mucinous ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between postoperative chemotherapy and survival of women with stage IC mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC).

METHODS

Comprehensive nationwide tumor registry data from the Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities in the United States from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively examined. Women with stage IC MOC who underwent primary surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy were compared to those who did not receive. Clinico-pathological factors associated with chemotherapy use, and overall survival associated with chemotherapy use were examined with multivariable models and propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). External validation was performed by examining the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 1988 to 2014.

RESULTS

There were 532 (58.5%) women who received postoperative chemotherapy and 377 (41.5%) women who did not. On multivariable analysis, those with moderately-/poorly-differentiated tumors, large tumor size, and who underwent lymphadenectomy were more likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy whereas young women and those with capsule rupture alone were less likely to receive postoperative chemotherapy (all, P < 0.05). After IPTW, there was no difference in overall survival among women who received postoperative chemotherapy versus those who did not on multivariable analysis (adjusted 4-year rates: 85.8% versus 86.3%, adjusted-hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-1.31). Similarly, there was no benefit with chemotherapy regardless of patient age, tumor differentiation, performance of nodal dissection, and substage groups. Among 912 cases in the validation cohort (postoperative chemotherapy use, n = 520 [57.0%]), postoperative chemotherapy use was not associated with cause-specific survival (adjusted-HR 1.296, 95% CI 0.846-1.984, P = 0.233) or overall survival (adjusted-HR 1.131, 95% CI 0.849-1.508, P = 0.400).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative chemotherapy was received by fewer than 60% of women with stage IC MOC, and postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival.