1
|
Pain Management during Office Hysteroscopy: An Evidence-Based Approach. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58081132. [PMID: 36013599 PMCID: PMC9416725 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58081132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Hysteroscopy is a reliable technique which is highly useful for the evaluation and management of intrauterine pathology. Recently, the widespread nature of in-office procedures without the need for anesthesia has been requesting validation of practical approach in order to reduce procedure-related pain. In this regard, we performed a comprehensive review of literature regarding pain management in office hysteroscopic procedures. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register), Global Health, Health Technology Assessment Database and Web of Science, other research registers (for example Clinical Trials database) were searched. We searched for all original articles regarding pain relief strategy during office hysteroscopy, without date restriction. Results have been collected and recommendations have been summarized according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool. Moreover, the strength of each recommendation was scored following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment (GRADE) system, in order to present the best available evidence. Results: Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for pain management are feasible and can be applied in office setting for hysteroscopic procedures. The selection of strategy should be modulated according to the characteristics of the patient and difficulty of the procedure. Conclusions: Accumulating evidence support the use of pharmacological and other pharmacological-free strategies for reducing pain during office hysteroscopy. Nevertheless, future research priorities should aim to identify the recommended approach (or combined approaches) according to the characteristics of the patient and difficulty of the procedure.
Collapse
|
2
|
Marchand GJ, Kurdi W, Sainz K, Maarouf H, Ware K, Masoud AT, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Cieminski K, Calteux N, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Chen D, Pierson M, Rafie R, Shareef MA. Efficacy of hyoscine in pain management during hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2022; 23:51-57. [PMID: 34866373 PMCID: PMC8907440 DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2021-0057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant clinical trials from full-text, scientific journal archives to assess the efficacy of hyoscine for the management of pain during in-office hysteroscopy (OH) procedures. Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.Gov, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS and the Web of Science were searched for all clinical trials that matched our search criteria. A full assessment of bias was made using the Cochrane Group tool-set. The following outcomes were included: visual analogue scale (VAS) score for postoperative pain, postoperative need for analgesia, and procedure time. In the case of homogeneous data, the analysis was performed using a fixed effects system, and the random effects system was used with heterogeneous data. Inclusion criteria included only randomized clinical trials, and interventions that included patients receiving hyoscine-N-Butyl Bromide during OH, regardless of dose or mode of administration, and compared this with placebo. Three clinical trials were included. The actual mean difference (MD) of the VAS pain score showed no significant difference between hyoscine or placebo [MD: -0.28 (-1.08, 0.52), (p=0.49)]. For postoperative analgesia, the overall MD showed no significant difference between hyoscine or placebo [MD: 0.43 (0.16, 1.14), (p=0.09)]. For procedure time, the combined effect estimate failed to show any significant difference between hyoscine and placebo [MD: -0.66 (-2.77, 1.44) (p=0.54)]. Contrary to previously published data, our meta-analysis using the latest available RCTs fails to show hyoscine as being effective in reducing pain or the need for other forms of anesthesia in OH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg J. Marchand
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Wesam Kurdi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Katelyn Sainz
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Hiba Maarouf
- REProVita Fertility Center, Recklinghausen, Germany
| | - Kelly Ware
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America,International University of Health Sciences School of Medicine, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis
| | - Ahmed Taher Masoud
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America,Fayoum University Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum, Egypt
| | - Alexa King
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Stacy Ruther
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Giovanna Brazil
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Kaitlynne Cieminski
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Nicolas Calteux
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Hollie Ulibarri
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Julia Parise
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Amanda Arroyo
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa, AZ, United States of America
| | - Diana Chen
- Midwestern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, AZ, United States of America
| | - Maria Pierson
- Midwestern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, AZ, United States of America
| | - Rasa Rafie
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, United States of America
| | - Mohammad Abrar Shareef
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sebasticook Valley Hospital, Pittsfield, ME, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|