Exploring the nature of situational goal-based coping in early-stage breast cancer patients: A contextual approach

Resilience in older adults with cancer: A scoping literature review

INTRODUCTION

Resilience, the ability to respond to stressors by maintaining or rapidly returning to normal homeostasis, serves as a new paradigm to improve the care of older adults. However, resilience research in oncology is nascent. We aimed to describe the current research landscape on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial resilience in older cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE from inception to January 28, 2022 for records with the terms "resilient OR resilience OR resiliency." We included studies that focused on persons over age 65 with cancer and assessed physical, cognitive, or psychological resilience. We excluded studies that did not report original data; did not have the full text available; assessed resilience on fewer than three time points; and published in non-English languages. Definitions and measures of resilience were extracted and categorized using qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Of 473 articles screened, we found 29 articles that met criteria for inclusion in our review. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the definitions and measures of resilience. Resilience was defined as robustness/resistance to decline (n = 11), recovery from trauma/stressor (n = 7), and adaptive and proactive coping behaviors (n = 6). Ten papers did not define resilience. 21 studies utilized longitudinal analysis, five studies used randomized and nonrandomized control trials, and four studies assessed pre-post analysis. Stressors included cancer diagnosis (n = 18), chemotherapy (n = 3), radiation (n = 3), acute illness (n = 3), surgery (n = 2), and hematopoietic cell transplant (n = 1).

DISCUSSION

Evidence for predictors and determinants of resilience in older adults with cancer is limited by the absence of standardized definitions and measurements. There is a fundamental need for a more precise definition, measures, and understanding of the physiologic mechanisms underlying the response to the physical, cognitive, and psychosocial stressors of cancer and its treatments.

Goal adjustment by people living with long-term conditions: A scoping review of literature published from January 2007 to June 2018

Long-term health conditions can limit achievement of personal goals. We aimed to map and synthesize definitions of goal adjustment, theoretical underpinnings, associations with recovery and supportive interventions for adults with long-term conditions. We searched multiple databases (January 2007-June 2018) and identified peer-reviewed research relating to goal adjustment. Data were charted, mapped and synthesized using content analysis and descriptive summaries. Two stakeholder consultations informed the review. Ninety-one articles were included. A range of long-term conditions were represented including cancer (22%), stroke (12%) and mixed neurological conditions (8%). Goal adjustment was one available option when faced with unattainable goals; other options were goal disengagement and goal re-engagement. Most studies were quantitative (58%), reporting mainly positive associations between goal adjustment, disengagement, reengagement and recovery. The Dual Process Model, Goal Adjustment Model and Self-Regulation Theory were most cited underpinning models/theory. Five interventions were identified; only one (self-system therapy) was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. Our review provides original and significant insights into goal adjustment definitions, theoretical underpinnings and association with recovery. Effective interventions to support goal adjustment, disengagement and reengagement are lacking. This research-practice gap warrants attention to ensure people with long-term conditions are optimally supported when facing unattainable goals.

Do cancer patients use the term resilience? A systematic review of qualitative studies

PURPOSE

Resilience is a dynamic process of positive adaptation to adversity, including cancer. While the term is used frequently by researchers, controversy exists over its conceptualisation and little is known if and how cancer patients use the term resilience. We examined qualitative studies exploring cancer patient experiences/perceptions of resilience to understand: (a) definitions of resilience as identified by patients and researchers and (b) the themes relating to attributes of resilience as identified by patients.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and CINAHL) were searched from database inception to November 2017, identifying qualitative studies of adult cancer patients/survivors which included resilience and cancer in the title, abstract, or medical subject headings. Articles were excluded if resilience was not a theme or outcome or was discussed primarily in the context of non-individuals. Thematic analysis was used to code studies and generate analytical themes, and a single author identified definitions of resilience within the studies.

RESULTS

Five hundred and seventy-three non-duplicate citations were screened, resulting in 65 citations screened for full-text review. Of these, 33 were excluded, leaving 32 studies. Four thematic categories emerged; coping strategies, social support, spirituality, and growth, within which 79 individual themes were identified. Eight researcher definitions and no patient definitions of resilience were identified.

CONCLUSION

This review found no cancer patient definitions of resilience and that cancer patients are seldom quoted using the term resilience directly, instead identifying coping strategies, social support, growth, and spirituality as attributes associated with resilience.

Examining the influence of personal goal interference and attainability on psychological distress in non-metastatic breast cancer patients

The present study investigated the relationship between two goal-related appraisals - perceived cancer-related interference and perceived attainability of important personal goals - and psychological distress among non-metastatic breast cancer patients across the short-term treatment and recovery period. Forty-five women completed self-report questionnaires at approximately 1 and 6 months following surgery. A mixed idiographic-nomothetic goal methodology assessed perceived cancer-related interference and attainability of self-generated important personal goals. Psychological distress symptoms were assessed with the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales short form. Correlation analyses and general linear modelling were used to evaluate the hypothesised relationships over time. Average cancer-related interference and attainability of important personal goals were significantly associated with concurrent depression, anxiety and stress symptoms at 6 months following surgery. Perceived attainability of highly important goals at 6 months post-surgery uniquely predicted change in psychological distress symptoms over time. The findings suggest that low perceived attainability of important personal goals may be an important predictor of elevated distress symptoms across the short-term following surgery. Further insight into the relationship between these negative goal appraisals and psychological functioning among different groups of cancer patients could inform the provision of targeted psychosocial support across the cancer continuum.