Clonidine effects on pain evoked SII activity in humans

Increased Sympathetic Outflow Induces Adaptation to Acute Experimental Pain

BACKGROUND

There are interrelationships between the autonomic nervous system and pain. This study aims to explore the effect of different autonomic manipulations on pain perception and modulation.

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects (10 men and 10 women, mean age 25 ± 3 years) participated in this single-blinded, semi-randomized, controlled study, which included 2 study visits. Warm detection thresholds, heat pain thresholds, conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and pain adaptation were tested before and after administration of phenylephrine, clonidine, yohimbine, and saline.

RESULTS

Changes in heart rate and blood pressure were found after all the pharmacological interventions. The only effect on pain measures was that yohimbine enhanced pain adaptation capacity while phenylephrine reduced it (P = 0.032). Several significant correlations were found between autonomic and pain parameters; greater decreases in heart rate after phenylephrine were associated with reduced pain ratings (r² = 0.288, P = 0.018). In addition, enhanced pain adaptation was associated with higher total vascular resistance (r² = 0.442, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Different effects of acute autonomic manipulations on experimental pain were found: an increase in sympathetic tone induced by yohimbine led to reduced pain sensitivity; a decrease in sympathetic tone with no effect on vagal-parasympathetic tone induced by phenylephrine led to reduction in pain adaptation capacity; and a decrease in sympathetic tone and increase in vagal parasympathetic tone by clonidine led to no change in pain adaptation capacity. While increased sympathetic outflow does facilitate pain adaptation, activation of either the sympathetic or parasympathetic limbs of the autonomic nervous system does not affect pain thresholds or CPM. Finally, a correlation exists between nociception and cardiovascular parameters only due to baroreflex activation.

Pain Modulation and Autonomic Function: The Effect of Clonidine

OBJECTIVE

The α2-agonist clonidine is an analgesic agent, whose yet uncertain action may involve either increase in pain modulation efficiency, change in autonomic function, and/or decrease in anxiety level. The present study aimed to examine the effect of oral clonidine on pain perception in healthy subjects in order to reveal its mode of action.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SUBJECTS

Forty healthy subjects.

METHODS

Subjects received either 0.15 mg oral clonidine or placebo. We measured pain parameters of heat pain thresholds, tonic heat stimulus, mechanical temporal summation, offset analgesia (OA) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM); autonomic parameters of deep breathing ratio and heart rate variability indices obtained before, during, and after tonic heat stimulus; and psychological parameters of anxiety and pain catastrophizing.

RESULTS

Clonidine decreased systolic blood pressure (P = 0.022) and heart rate (P = 0.004) and increased rMSSD (P = 0.020), though no effect was observed on pain perception, pain modulation, and psychological parameters. Autonomic changes were correlated with pain modulation capacity; for OA, the separate slope model was significant (P = 0.008); in the clonidine group, more efficient OA was associated with lower heart rate (r = 0.633, P = 0.005), unlike in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

The change in autonomic function that was related to the increase in pain modulation capacity, and the lack of change in anxiety, suggest a combined modulatory-autonomic mode of analgesic action for clonidine.

The Relationships Between Parasympathetic Function and Pain Perception: The Role of Anxiety

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have identified relationships between autonomic function and pain perception. Anxiety was found to influence both autonomic and pain responses. We examined the effect of anxiety level on parasympathetic function and pain perception as well as on the relationships between these 2 systems.

METHODS

Thirty healthy females were divided into high- and low-anxiety groups according to their trait anxiety levels. Parasympathetic function was obtained using heart rate variability, deep breathing, and Valsalva ratios. Pain perception parameters of heat pain thresholds, pain rating of supra-thresholds stimulus, mechanical temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation response were examined.

RESULTS

The low-anxiety and high-anxiety groups exhibited no significant differences in the parasympathetic function and pain perception parameters. Assessment of the associations revealed that in the high-anxiety group, higher mean ratings of the tonic heat pain stimulus were significantly correlated with higher rMSSD (r² = 0.358, P = 0.019), but this was not found for the low-anxiety group (P = 0.282). In addition, in the high-anxiety group, efficient conditioned pain modulation response was correlated with higher deep breathing ratio (r² = 0.363, P = 0.023); however, in the low-anxiety group, the correlation did not reach significance (P = 0.109).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the role of anxiety level on the relationships between parasympathetic function and pain perception. We suggest that a situation of high anxiety leads to higher norepinephrine levels that can influence both parasympathetic function and pain perception, thus explaining the significant relationships found between these 2 systems only in subjects with high anxiety.

Selective REM Sleep Deprivation Improves Expectation-Related Placebo Analgesia

The placebo effect is a neurobiological and psychophysiological process known to influence perceived pain relief. Optimization of placebo analgesia may contribute to the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of medication for acute and chronic pain management. We know that the placebo effect operates through two main mechanisms, expectations and learning, which is also influenced by sleep. Moreover, a recent study suggested that rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is associated with modulation of expectation-mediated placebo analgesia. We examined placebo analgesia following pharmacological REM sleep deprivation and we tested the hypothesis that relief expectations and placebo analgesia would be improved by experimental REM sleep deprivation in healthy volunteers. Following an adaptive night in a sleep laboratory, 26 healthy volunteers underwent classical experimental placebo analgesic conditioning in the evening combined with pharmacological REM sleep deprivation (clonidine: 13 volunteers or inert control pill: 13 volunteers). Medication was administered in a double-blind manner at bedtime, and placebo analgesia was tested in the morning. Results revealed that 1) placebo analgesia improved with REM sleep deprivation; 2) pain relief expectations did not differ between REM sleep deprivation and control groups; and 3) REM sleep moderated the relationship between pain relief expectations and placebo analgesia. These results support the putative role of REM sleep in modulating placebo analgesia. The mechanisms involved in these improvements in placebo analgesia and pain relief following selective REM sleep deprivation should be further investigated.

Reporting of sample size calculations in analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review

Sample size calculations determine the number of participants required to have sufficiently high power to detect a given treatment effect. In this review, we examined the reporting quality of sample size calculations in 172 publications of double-blind randomized controlled trials of noninvasive pharmacologic or interventional (ie, invasive) pain treatments published in European Journal of Pain, Journal of Pain, and Pain from January 2006 through June 2013. Sixty-five percent of publications reported a sample size calculation but only 38% provided all elements required to replicate the calculated sample size. In publications reporting at least 1 element, 54% provided a justification for the treatment effect used to calculate sample size, and 24% of studies with continuous outcome variables justified the variability estimate. Publications of clinical pain condition trials reported a sample size calculation more frequently than experimental pain model trials (77% vs 33%, P < .001) but did not differ in the frequency of reporting all required elements. No significant differences in reporting of any or all elements were detected between publications of trials with industry and nonindustry sponsorship. Twenty-eight percent included a discrepancy between the reported number of planned and randomized participants. This study suggests that sample size calculation reporting in analgesic trial publications is usually incomplete. Investigators should provide detailed accounts of sample size calculations in publications of clinical trials of pain treatments, which is necessary for reporting transparency and communication of pre-trial design decisions.

PERSPECTIVE

In this systematic review of analgesic clinical trials, sample size calculations and the required elements (eg, treatment effect to be detected; power level) were incompletely reported. A lack of transparency regarding sample size calculations may raise questions about the appropriateness of the calculated sample size.

Modulation of physiological reflexes by pain: role of the locus coeruleus

The locus coeruleus (LC) is activated by noxious stimuli, and this activation leads to inhibition of perceived pain. As two physiological reflexes, the acoustic startle reflex and the pupillary light reflex, are sensitive to noxious stimuli, this review considers evidence that this sensitivity, at least to some extent, is mediated by the LC. The acoustic startle reflex, contraction of a large body of skeletal muscles in response to a sudden loud acoustic stimulus, can be enhanced by both directly ("sensitization") and indirectly ("fear conditioning") applied noxious stimuli. Fear-conditioning involves the association of a noxious (unconditioned) stimulus with a neutral (conditioned) stimulus (e.g., light), leading to the ability of the conditioned stimulus to evoke the "pain response". The enhancement of the startle response by conditioned fear ("fear-potentiated startle") involves the activation of the amygdala. The LC may also be involved in both sensitization and fear potentiation: pain signals activate the LC both directly and indirectly via the amygdala, which results in enhanced motoneurone activity, leading to an enhanced muscular response. Pupil diameter is under dual sympathetic/parasympathetic control, the sympathetic (noradrenergic) output dilating, and the parasympathetic (cholinergic) output constricting the pupil. The light reflex (constriction of the pupil in response to a light stimulus) operates via the parasympathetic output. The LC exerts a dual influence on pupillary control: it contributes to the sympathetic outflow and attenuates the parasympathetic output by inhibiting the Edinger-Westphal nucleus, the preganglionic cholinergic nucleus in the light reflex pathway. Noxious stimulation results in pupil dilation ("reflex dilation"), without any change in the light reflex response, consistent with sympathetic activation via the LC. Conditioned fear, on the other hand, results in the attenuation of the light reflex response ("fear-inhibited light reflex"), consistent with the inhibition of the parasympathetic light reflex via the LC. It is suggested that directly applied pain and fear-conditioning may affect different populations of autonomic neurones in the LC, directly applied pain activating sympathetic and fear-conditioning parasympathetic premotor neurones.

[Pharmacological fMRI : new possibilities for assessing the efficacy of analgesic agents]

Pain is a complex subjective phenomenon that so far cannot be objectively quantified by any standardized procedure. This fact renders it also difficult to measure the efficacy of analgesic drugs. In recent years the application of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has significantly increased our current knowledge about the brain physiological correlates of pain in humans. The technique is non-invasive and detects the increased blood flow into neuronally active brain regions based on the so-called BOLD (blood oxygenation level dependent) effect of T2-weighted MRI. This paper gives an overview of the application of pharmacological fMRI (phfMRI) as an approach to evaluate the efficacy of analgesics. In contrast to EEG- and MEG-based methods phfMRI allows more flexibility in the design of experimental paradigms and stimulus protocols to account for the diversity of clinical pain types (inflammatory pain, tactile allodynia etc.) or their dependence upon psychological circumstances (anxiety, depression, stress) in which pain occurs. However, in order to specifically refer results from phfMRI to the neuronal processes underlying pain, future research needs to increase the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the neurovascular coupling reaction represented by the BOLD technique. The same applies for the influence of cerebrovascular diseases on the BOLD response.

Noxious counterirritation in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee reduces MCC but not SII pain generators: A combined use of MEG and EEG

Chronic pain is mainly a result of two processes: peripheral and central sensitization, which can result in neuroplastic changes. Previous psychophysical studies suggested a decrease of the so-called pain-inhibiting-pain effect (DNIC) in chronic pain patients. We aimed to study the DNIC effect on the neuronal level using magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography in 12 patients suffering from advanced unilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA). DNIC was induced in patients by provoking the typical OA pain by a slightly hyperextended joint position, while they received short electrical pain stimuli. Although the patients did not report a reduction of electrical pain perception, the cingulate gyrus showed a decrease of activation during provoked OA pain, while activity in the secondary somatosensory cortex did not change. Based on much stronger DNIC induction at comparable intensities of an acute counterirritant pain in healthy subjects this result suggests a deficit of DNIC in OA patients. We suggest that the strength of DNIC is subject to neuronal plasticity of descending inhibitory pain systems and diminishes during the development of a chronic pain condition.

Role of neuroimaging in analgesic drug development

Rapidly developing, non-invasive, neuroimaging methods provide increasingly detailed structural and functional information about the nervous system, helping advance our understanding of pain processing, chronic pain conditions and the mechanisms of analgesia. However, effective treatment for many chronic pain conditions remains a large, unmet medical need. Neuroimaging techniques may enhance our understanding of why currently available analgesics are ineffective for so many patients and aid in identifying new neural targets for pharmacological interventions of pain. This review examines how neuroimaging has enhanced our understanding of the mechanisms of chronic pain, the neural correlates of pharmacological modulation of pain, and the role of neuroimaging in analgesic development. Rather than focusing on one method, we discuss the advantages and limitations of several techniques that may each serve a unique role in aiding drug development, and we discuss current issues that exist in the design and implementation of pharmacological neuroimaging studies. Particularly, experimental design must be carefully considered as there are limitations in terms of the pharmacokinetics of the drug of interest as well as in respect to the capabilities of the neuroimaging method in use. Finally, we identify future directions including novel approaches that may also play a role in furthering our knowledge of the neural basis of analgesia. In the future, neuroimaging will certainly impact the methodology of analgesic drug development as it may lead to quicker and more efficient methods of evaluating the neural modulation of chronic pain.

Duration of the cue-to-pain delay increases pain intensity: a combined EEG and MEG study

Expectation of pain is an important adaptive process enabling individuals to avoid bodily harm. It reflects the linking of past experience and environmental cues with imminent threat. In the present study, we examined changes in perceived pain contingent upon variation of the interval between an auditory cue and a subsequent painful laser stimulus. The duration of the cue-to-stimulus delay was systematically varied between 2, 4 and 6 s. Pain intensity and evoked brain responses measured by EEG and MEG recordings were analysed. Pain ratings from 15 subjects increased with longer cue-to-pain delays, accompanied by an increase in activity of the midcingulate cortex (MCC), as modelled from evoked EEG potential maps. On the other hand, MEG-based source activity in secondary somatosensory (SII) cortex remained unaffected by manipulation of the cue-to-stimulus interval. We conclude that activity in limbic structures such as MCC play a key role in the temporal dynamics of recruitment of expectation towards pain. Although this reaction is adaptive if the individual is able to avoid the stimulus, it is maladaptive if such opportunity is not present.