Clonidine and guanfacine-induced antinociception in visceral pain: possible role of α2/I2 binding sites

Visceral Pain in Preterm Infants with Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Underlying Mechanisms and Implications for Treatment

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a relatively rare but very severe gastrointestinal disease primarily affecting very preterm infants. NEC is characterized by excessive inflammation and ischemia in the intestines, and is associated with prolonged, severe visceral pain. Despite its recognition as a highly painful disease, current pain management for NEC is often inadequate, and research on optimal analgesic therapy for these patients is lacking. Insight into the mechanisms underlying intestinal pain in infants with NEC-visceral pain-could help identify the most effective analgesics for these vulnerable patients. Therefore, this comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of visceral nociception, including transduction, transmission, modulation, and experience, and discuss the implications for analgesic therapy in preterm infants with NEC. The transmission of visceral pain differs from that of somatic pain, contributing to the diffuse nature of visceral pain. Studies evaluating the effectiveness of analgesics for treating visceral pain in infants are scarce. However, research in visceral pain models highlights agents that may be particularly effective for treating visceral pain based on their mechanisms of action. Further research is necessary to determine whether agents that have shown promise for treating visceral pain in preclinical studies and adults are effective in infants with NEC as well.

Alpha Alert: Utilization of Transdermal Clonidine for Refractory Agitation

Alpha-2 agonists are under-recognized for their class effects yet offer potential benefit in specialty palliative care via decreasing sympathetic output, inducing sedation, and modulating pain. Especially in clinical contexts where agitation predominates and patients are intolerant of oral medication route, transdermal medication delivery is advantageous. We report a case of agitated behaviors in setting of mixed Alzheimer/vascular-type dementia limiting hospital discharge to nursing facility that were ameliorated with transdermal clonidine. We suggest palliative clinicians routinely conceptualize the seemingly disparate alpha-2 agonists as a class for effective symptom palliation especially as new clinical evidence becomes available.

Guanfacine Normalizes the Overexpression of Presynaptic α-2A Adrenoceptor Signaling and Ameliorates Neuropathic Pain in a Chronic Animal Model of Type 1 Diabetes

Background: Diabetes is associated with several complications, including neuropathic pain, which is difficult to manage with currently available drugs. Descending noradrenergic neurons possess antinociceptive activity; however, their involvement in diabetic neuropathic pain remains to be explored. Methods: To infer the regulatory role of this system, we examined as a function of diabetes, the expression and localization of alpha-2A adrenoceptors (α2-AR) in the dorsal root ganglia and key regions of the central nervous system, including pons and lumbar segment of the spinal cord using qRT-PCR, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence-based techniques. Results: The data revealed that presynaptic synaptosomal-associated protein-25 labeled α2-AR in the central and peripheral nervous system of streptozotocin diabetic rats was upregulated both at the mRNA and protein levels. Interestingly, the levels of postsynaptic density protein-95 labeled postsynaptic neuronal α2-AR remained unaltered as a function of diabetes. These biochemical abnormalities in the noradrenergic system of diabetic animals were associated with increased pain sensitivity as typified by the presence of thermal hyperalgesia and cold/mechanical allodynia. The pain-related behaviors were assessed using Hargreaves apparatus, cold-plate and dynamic plantar aesthesiometer. Chronically administered guanfacine, a selective α2-AR agonist, to diabetic animals downregulated the upregulation of neuronal presynaptic α2-AR and ameliorated the hyperalgesia and the cold/mechanical allodynia in these animals. Conclusion: Together, these findings demonstrate that guanfacine may function as a potent analgesic and highlight α2-AR, a key component of the descending neuronal autoinhibitory pathway, as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of diabetic neuropathic pain.

Ambulatory detoxification in alcohol use disorder and opioid use disorder

Ambulatory detoxification in alcohol use disorder and opioid use disorder is an important component in the management of patients experiencing withdrawal symptoms from alcohol or opioids. The goal of withdrawal management is ultimately to provide each patient with comfort and safety. Having the knowledge of the possible signs and symptoms of intoxication and withdrawal assists providers to institute the most appropriate treatment protocol and setting for the patient. Pharmacists play a vital role in choosing appropriate therapeutic management options for common or complex clinical situations involving ambulatory detoxification from alcohol and opioids. Ambulatory detoxification serves as an appealing option to many patients and helps save the limited inpatient resources that many institutions have for those patients with more severe withdrawal presentations.

The imidazoline receptors and ligands in pain modulation

Pain is an unpleasant experience and effects daily routine negatively. Although there are various drugs, many of them are not entirely successful in relieving pain, since pain modulation is a complex process involving numerous mediators and receptors. Therefore, it is a rational approach to identify the factors involved in the complex process and develop new agents that act on these pain producing mechanisms. In this respect, the involvement of the imidazoline receptors in pain modulation has drawn attention in recent years. In this review, it is aimed to focus on the imidazoline receptors and their ligands which contribute to the pain modulation. It is demonstrated that imidazoline-2 (I2) receptors are steady new drug targets for analgesics. Even if the mechanism of I2 receptor is not well known in the modulation of pain, it is known that it plays a role in tonic and chronic pain but not in acute phasic pain. Moreover, the I2 receptor ligands increase the analgesic effects of opioids in both acute and chronic pain and prevent the development of opioid tolerance. So, they are valuable for the chronic pain treatment and also therapeutic coadjuvants in the management of chronic pain with opiate drugs due to the attenuation of opioid tolerance and addiction. Thus, the use of the ligands which bind to the imidazoline receptors is an effective strategy for relieving pain. This educational forum exhibits the role of imidazoline receptors and ligands in pain process by utilizing experimental studies.

Plasticity of α2-adrenergic spinal antinociception following nerve injury: selective, bidirectional interaction with the delta opioid receptor

Interactions of opioid receptors with other receptor families can be made use of to improve analgesia and reduce adverse effects of opioid analgesics. We investigated interactions of the α2-adrenergic receptor (α2AR) with opioid receptors of the mu (MOR) and delta (DOR) types in the spinal dorsal horn in an animal model of neuropathic pain induced by spinal nerve ligation. Nine days after nerve injury, immunoreactivity for the α2AR subtype A (α2AAR) was increased both in tissue homogenates and at pre- and post-synaptic sites in transverse sections. The efficacy of spinally administered α2AAR agonist guanfacine at reducing C-fiber-evoked field potentials was increased in nerve-ligated rats. This reducing effect was impaired by simultaneous administration of DOR antagonist naltrindole, but not MOR antagonist CTOP, suggesting that concurrent DOR activation was required for α2AAR-mediated inhibition. While DOR agonist deltorphin II and MOR agonist DAMGO both effectively depressed C-fiber-evoked spinal field potentials, DOR- but not MOR-mediated depression was enhanced by subclinical guanfacine. In conscious, nerve-ligated rats, chronically administered deltorphin II produced stable thermal and mechanical antinociception over the 9 following days after nerve injury without apparent signs of habituation. Such an effect was dramatically enhanced by co-administration of a low dose of guanfacine, which reversed thermal and mechanical thresholds to levels near those prior to injury. The results suggest that spinal, α2AAR-mediated antinociception is increased after nerve injury and based on DOR co-activation. We demonstrate in vivo that α2AAR/DOR interaction can be exploited to provide effective behavioral antinociception during neuropathic pain.

Psychiatric agents and implications for perioperative analgesia

The use of antidepressants, anxiolytics, mood stabilizers, anticonvulsants, and major tranquilizers introduces neurochemical, behavioral, cognitive, and emotional factors that increase the complexity of medical and surgical tasks. Increasingly, various classes of psychotropic medications are being prescribed in the perioperative setting for their analgesic properties in patients with or without a psychiatric diagnosis. In many cases, the precise mechanisms of action and dose-response relationships by which these agents mediate analgesia are largely unclear. An appreciation of the side effects and adverse-effect profiles of such medications and familiarity with the clinically relevant drug interactions that may occur in the perioperative setting are imperative to ensure the best possible outcome in dealing with patients on these medications. This review focuses on various classes of psychotropic agents, which are addressed individually, with particular focus on their analgesic properties. The latest published research is summarized, deficiencies in our current collective knowledge are discussed, and evidence-based recommendations are made for clinical practice.

Effects of perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in combination with levobupivacaine in a rat sciatic nerve block

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess if perineural administration of dexmedetomidine combined with levobupivacaine increases the duration of the sensory and motor blockade of a sciatic peripheral nerve block in rats.

METHODS

Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 5 experimental groups: Group 1, sham; Group 2, perineural levobupivacaine (0.2 mL of a 0.5% solution) and subcutaneous saline; Group 3, perineural levobupivacaine (0.2 mL of a 0.5% solution) plus dexmedetomidine (20 µg/kg dexmedetomidine) and subcutaneous saline; Group 4, perineural saline and subcutaneous dexmedetomidine; and Group 5, perineural saline and subcutaneous saline. Pain reflexes in response to a thermal stimulus were measured at 0 and 240 minutes after drug administration by using a hot-plate and tail-flick tests. Neurobehavioral status, including sensory and motor functions, was assessed by an investigator who was blinded to the experimental groups every 30 minutes until normal functioning resumed.

RESULTS

The sensory and motor blockades of the rats did not increase in the treatment with dexmedetomidine plus levobupivacaine when compared with the treatment with levobupivacaine alone at all the time points (P > 0.05). Compared with rats in Group 2, those in Group 3 showed significantly higher latency times at 30 and 60 minutes in the hot plate test (P < 0.01). At 30 and 60 minutes, the latency times of the rats in Group 3 were longer than those in Group 2 in the tail-flick test (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the durations of the complete sensory and motor blockade were similar when treatment with levobupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine was compared with treatment with levobupivacaine alone.

CONCLUSIONS

A 20µg/kg dose of dexmedetomidine added to levobupivacaine did not increase the duration of the sensory and motor blockades in rats. However, treatment with dexmedetomidine plus levobupivacaine increased the quality of analgesia in rats.

The antinociceptive effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine in colorectal distension-induced visceral pain in rats: the role of opioid receptors

BACKGROUND

In comparison with cutaneous pain, the role of alpha(2)-adrenoceptor (alpha(2)-AR) agonists in visceral pain has not been extensively examined. We aimed to characterize the antinociceptive effect of IV dexmedetomidine on visceral pain in rats and to determine whether antinociception thus produced is mediated by opioid receptors.

METHODS

Male Sprague Dawley rats (250-300 g) were instrumented with a venous catheter for drug administration and with enameled nichrome electrodes for electromyography of the external oblique muscles. Colorectal distension (CRD) was used as the noxious visceral stimulus, and the visceromotor response to CRD was quantified electromyographically before and 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after dexmedetomidine or clonidine administration. Antagonists were administered 10 min before dexmedetomidine. After confirmation of normal distribution of data, one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test was used for multiple comparison.

RESULTS

IV administration of dexmedetomidine (2.5-20 microg/kg) and clonidine (10-80 microg/kg) produced a dose-dependent reduction in visceromotor response with 50% effective dose values of 10.5 and 37.6 microg/kg, respectively. Administration of the nonspecific alpha(2)-AR antagonist yohimbine (1 mg/kg), but not the peripherally restricted alpha(2)-AR antagonist MK-467 (1 mg/kg), abolished the antinociceptive effect of dexmedetomidine (10 microg/kg). In addition, inhibition of opioid receptors by naloxone (1 mg/kg) attenuated the antinociceptive effect of dexmedetomidine.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that IV dexmedetomidine exerts pronounced antinociception against CRD-induced visceral pain and suggest that the antinociceptive effect of dexmedotimidine is mediated in part by opioid receptors, but peripheral alpha(2)-ARs are not involved.

Analgesia after caesarean delivery

As the number of women giving birth by caesarean increases throughout most of the developed world, so too is research into postoperative pain relief for these women. Like most other post-surgical populations, the new mother needs effective pain relief so that she can mobilise early but she also has the added responsibility of needing to care for her newborn baby. There is no 'gold standard' for post-caesarean pain management; the number of options is large and the choice of method is at least partly determined by drug availability, regional and individual preferences, resource limitations and financial considerations. Most methods rely on opioids, supplemented with anti-inflammatory analgesics, nerve blocks or other adjunctive techniques. The aim of this review is to detail commonly used opioid-based methods and to review the evidence supporting non-opioid methods, when incorporated into a multimodal approach to post-caesarean pain management. Areas of promising research are also discussed.

The synergistic interaction between rilmenidine and paracetamol in the writhing test in mice

The aim of the study was to ascertain antinociceptive effects of rilmenidine, a second-generation imidazoline-alpha-2-adrenoreceptor agonist, and to see whether rilmenidine was able to increase the analgesic effects of paracetamol in the writhing test in mice. An acetic acid (0.7%) solution was injected into the peritoneal cavity and the number of writhes was counted. The influence on locomotor performance was tested using the rotarod test. Rilmenidine, paracetamol, and rilmenidine-paracetamol fixed-ratio combinations produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects. ED(50) values were estimated for the individual drugs and an isobologram was constructed. The derived theoretical additive ED(50) value for the rilmenidine-paracetamol combination was 109.23 +/- 35.05 mg/kg. This value was significantly greater than the observed ED(50) value which was 56.35 +/- 20.86 mg/kg, indicating a synergistic interaction. Rilmenidine did not impair motor coordination, as measured by the rotarod test, at antinociceptive and higher doses.

Gabapentin action and interaction on the antinociceptive effect of morphine on visceral pain in mice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Visceral pain is one of the most common forms of pain and for which new drugs would be welcome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether gabapentin inhibits induced abdominal contractions in mice and to examine the effect of its co-administration with morphine.

METHODS

A total of 96 mice received acetic acid intraperitoneally after administration of saline or gabapentin (1, 5, 10, 50 and 100 mg kg(-1)) or morphine (0.25, 0.5, 1, 3 and 5 mg kg(-1)) or a combination of morphine and gabapentin. Other groups also received naloxone. The number of writhes were counted.

RESULTS

Both gabapentin and morphine reduced writhing in a dose-dependent manner. The number of writhes was decreased significantly by gabapentin (50 and 100 mg kg(-1)) and morphine (0.5, 1, 3 and 5 mg kg(-1)) (P < 0.001). Also, the lowest dose of morphine 0.25 mg kg(-1) when combined with low doses of gabapentin significantly decreased the number of writhes (P < 0.005). The combination of a low effective dose of gabapentin (50 mg kg(-1)) with a low dose of morphine decreased the writhing by 94% as compared to the controls. The antinociceptive effect of combined administration was not reversed by naloxone.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrated the comparable efficacy of gabapentin with morphine in visceral pain. Also, the results showed that the combination of doses of gabapentin and morphine, which were ineffective alone, produced a significant analgesic effect in the writhing model of pain. This may be clinically important in the management of visceral pain.

Relief of acute pain in chronic idiopathic gastroparesis with intravenous phentolamine

OBJECTIVE

To report a case in which complete relief of pain associated with gastroparesis, with promotion of gastric emptying, was achieved with administration of phentolamine.

CASE SUMMARY

A 37-year-old opiate-tolerant female with a history of recurrent abdominal pain, gastroparesis, cyclic vomiting syndrome, and migraine headaches was admitted to the emergency department (ED) with severe acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. The patient had been previously implanted with a permanent gastric electrical stimulator and she was adherent to her prokinetic, antiemetic, analgesic, and migraine prophylactic medications. Pain relief was achieved rapidly and completely in the ED with sympatholysis by administration of intravenous phentolamine 0.5 mg/kg over 60 minutes, with continuous cardiac monitoring. At a 2 month follow-up visit, the patient reported chronic pain relief, and a decrease in opiate doses was maintained by oral administration of clonidine 0.1 mg twice daily.

DISCUSSION

Gastroparesis represents a difficult treatment challenge because management of gastric dysmotility and the accompanying severe abdominal pain is often mutually exacerbating and ineffective. Sympatholysis by intravenous phentolamine provided profound and immediate relief of acute gastroparesis-related abdominal pain in our patient. The mechanism of phentolamine is believed to be receptor blockade at alpha-adrenergic receptors and, therefore, inhibition of the peripheral sensitizing effects of circulating norepinephrine. Although action at a peripheral nerve level is presumed, modulation of alpha-adrenoreceptors receptors is also possible at the dorsal root ganglion or at other central nervous system sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The dramatic relief of acute pain in gastroparesis by phentolamine observed in this case would warrant investigation of a larger, controlled case series. Patients who respond to intravenous sympatholysis may likewise be candidates for longer term sympathetic modulation with oral sympatholytics.

Possible role of NMDA receptors in antinociception induced by rilmenidine in mice in the formalin test

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate the possible role of MK-801, an NMDA antagonist, in analgesia induced by rilmenidine, an imidazoline (I(1)) agonist, in mice in the formalin test.

METHODS

25 microl of formalin 2.5% was injected into the dorsal surface of the right hind paw of the mouse. Pain response was scored after formalin injection for a period of 50 min. A weighted average of nociceptive score, ranging from 0 to 3, was calculated. The mean +/-SEM of scores between 0-5 and 15-40 min after formalin injection was presented.

RESULTS

The study showed that rilmenidine (1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.) produced analgesia dose-dependently (p<0.001) in formalin test. In addition, the results demonstrated that efaroxan (0.1 and 1 mg/kg, i.p.) could reduce the antinociceptive effect of rilmenidine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) (p<0.01) in animals, however, yohimbine (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg, i.p.) could not block the analgesia induced by rilmenidine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) (p>0.05). On the other hand, MK-801 (0.05 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced the pain related behaviors in mice (p>0.05). Moreover, our findings demonstrated that MK-801 (0.01 mg/kg, i.p.) could potentiate the analgesic effect of rilmenidine (1.25 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that imidazoline (I(1)) receptors play an important role in mediating the antinociception induced by rilmenidine in formalin test. Furthermore, it may be concluded that there is an interaction between NMDA receptors and imidazoline (I(1)) binding sites.

Postcesarean analgesia: effective strategies and association with chronic pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of postoperative pain after cesarean section slightly differs from that of the general surgical population, specifically women need to recover quickly to take care of their newborn baby. Optimal pain management is imperative for the success of immediate-term and long-term rehabilitation and this principle applies to obstetric patients. There is growing evidence that perioperative pain management has consequences extending well beyond the immediate recovery period. Unrelieved postoperative pain is a striking risk factor for the development of residual pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent study has highlighted that chronic pain may be a significant clinical problem after cesarean section. Among the risk factors, recalls of severe acute postoperative pain led to the reconsideration of postoperative pain management after cesarean delivery. Current published data agree that drug combinations, that is, multimodal or balanced analgesia, are mandatory to achieve satisfactory and effective pain relief with reduced side effects.

SUMMARY

The use of balanced analgesia has significantly improved acute pain management after cesarean section. Future studies should extend their investigations beyond the first 48 h and consider the long-term effects of different analgesic regimens, that is, those that alter the development of residual pain.