Involvement of central and peripheral cannabinoid receptors on antinociceptive effect of tetrahydrocannabinol in muscle pain

Modulation of morphine antinociceptive and rewarding effect by mirtazapine in an animal model of osteoarthritic pain

People with chronic pain mitigate their suffering by the action of opioids. Adverse reactions aside, opioids are not exempt from potential complications like addiction and abuse, which have posed a global public health problem lately. Finding new therapeutic strategies to improve analgesia and to reduce opioid side effects has become a priority. In this regard, the association of different adjuvant therapies has been postulated. Despite preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of antidepressants as analgesics, it is not clear whether they could help reduce the risk of addiction in combination with opioids. To further explore this idea a model of chronic osteoarthritis pain was employed, and a combination of mirtazapine and morphine was used in a chronic regimen in male and female rats. The effects on the development of tactile allodynia, movement-evoked pain, reward, analgesic tolerance, naloxone-induced withdrawal symptoms, impaired locomotor activity and anxiety were evaluated under a 25-day experimental protocol. Additionally, protein expression of μ-opioid receptors and clusterin (related with substance abuse) was evaluated in plasma and in brain structures of the reward system. Chronic morphine caused analgesic tolerance, reward and naloxone-induced withdrawal symptoms. The combination reduced the analgesic tolerance and prevented the development of withdrawal symptoms but showed sex-based differences regarding reward. Increased levels of clusterin in plasma were observed in females treated with morphine, but not with combined therapy. The combination of mirtazapine and morphine could be a promising strategy to improve the management of long-term opioid treatment and its risk of abuse, especially in females.

SHORT-TERM STRESS SIGNIFICANTLY DECREASES MORPHINE ANALGESIA IN TRIGEMINAL BUT NOT IN SPINAL INNERVATED AREAS IN RATS

Plenty information exists regarding the effects of chronic stress, although few data exist on the effects of short-lasting stressors, which would mimic daily challenges. Differences in craniofacial and spinal nociception have been observed, thus those observations obtained in spinally innervated areas cannot be directly applied to the orofacial region. Although, opioids are considered amongst the most effective analgesics, their use is sometimes hampered by the constipation they induce. Thus, our aims were to study if a short-lasting stressor, forced swim stress (FSS), modifies nociception, morphine antinociception and constipation in rats. Animals were submitted to 10-20min of FSS for three days, nociception and gastrointestinal transit were studied 24h after the last swimming session. Nociception and morphine (0.6-5mg/kg) antinociception were evaluated in the formalin and hypertonic saline tests in the orofacial area and limbs. Morphine-induced modifications in the GI transit were studied through radiographic techniques. Naloxone was administered, before each swimming session, to analyse the involvement of the endogenous opioid system on the effect of stress. Overall, stress did not alter nociception, although interestingly it reduced the effect of morphine in the orofacial tests and in the inflammatory phase of the formalin tests. Naloxone antagonized the effect of stress and normalized the effect of morphine. Stress did not modify the constipation induced by morphine. Opioid treatment may be less effective under a stressful situation, whilst adverse effects, such as constipation, are maintained. The prevention of stress may improve the level of opioid analgesia. Keywords.

SGK1.1 isoform is involved in nociceptive modulation, offering a protective effect against noxious cold stimulus in a sexually dimorphic manner

The serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) is a widely expressed protein in the Central Nervous System (CNS), involved in regulating the activity of a wide variety of ion channels and transporters and physiological functions, such as neuronal excitability. SGK1.1 is a neuronal splice isoform of SGK1, expressed exclusively in the CNS, distributed in brain and cerebellum, that decreases neuronal excitability via up-regulation of M-current, linked to Kv7.2/3 potassium channels. Strategies to maintain increased SGK1.1 activity could be helpful in decreasing neuronal hyperexcitability, as occurs in neuropathic pain. Transgenic mice overexpressing SGK1.1 (B6.Tg.sgk1) offer a particularly relevant opportunity to assess the physiological involvement of this protein in nociception. Behavior and physiological nociception were evaluated in male and female B6.Tg.sgk1 and wild-type mice (B6.WT), characterizing nociceptive thresholds to different nociceptive stimuli (thermal, chemical and mechanical), as well as the electrophysiological properties of cutaneous sensory Aδ-fibres isolated from the saphenous nerve. The acute antinociceptive effect of morphine was also evaluated. Compared with B6.WT animals, male and female B6.Tg.sgk1 mice showed increased spontaneous locomotor activity. Regarding nociception, there were no differences between transgenic and wild-type mice in heat, chemical and mechanical thresholds, but interestingly, male B6.Tg.sgk1 mice were less sensitive to cold stimulus; B6.Tg.sgk1 animals showed lower sensitivity to morphine. Electrophysiological properties of cutaneous primary afferent fibres were maintained. This is the first demonstration that the SGK1.1 isoform is involved in nociceptive modulation, offering a protective effect against noxious cold stimulus in a sexually dimorphic manner. B6.Tg.sgk1 mice offer a particularly relevant opportunity to further analyze the involvement of this protein in nociception, and studies in models of chronic, neuropathic pain are warranted.

The Effect of Medical Cannabis on Pain Level and Quality of Sleep among Rheumatology Clinic Outpatients

Introduction

Medical cannabis (MC) is becoming increasingly popular for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. In this study, we evaluated the effect of MC treatment on pain level and quality of sleep of patients with different medical conditions at the rheumatology clinic.

Methods

Patients licensed for the use of MC at the rheumatology clinics at different settings were located and contacted. Their demographic and clinical parameters were documented, including type of medical cannabis consumed, way of consumption, and current monthly consumed amount. These patients were contacted by phone and asked about the effect on pain level and quality of sleep.

Results

A total of 351 patients were located, and 319 completed the questionnaire. Mean age was 46 ± 12 years, 76% were female, 82% had fibromyalgia, ∼9% had mechanical problems, ∼4% had inflammatory problems, ∼4% had neurological problems, and ∼1% had other problems. The average monthly consumed dose of MC was 31, 35, 36, and 32 g, with mean pain level reduction of 77%, 82%, 83%, and 57%, and mean sleep quality improvement of 78%, 71%, 87%, and 76% among patients with fibromyalgia, mechanical, neuropathic, and inflammatory problems, respectively. Mean THC and CBD contents were 18.38% ± 4.96 and 2.62% ± 4.87, respectively. The THC concentration, duration of MC consumption, and MC consumption dose had independent significant correlations with pain reduction while only the duration of MC consumption had an independent significant correlation with sleep quality improvement.

Conclusions

MC had a favorable effect on pain level and quality of sleep among all spectrums of problems at the rheumatology clinic.

Cannabinoids in Neurology - Position paper from Scientific Departments from Brazilian Academy of Neurology

Cannabinoids comprehend endocannabinoids, phytocannabinoids, and synthetic cannabinoids, with actions both in the central and peripherical nervous systems. A considerable amount of publications have been made in recent years, although cannabis has been known for over a thousand years. Scientific Departments from the Brazilian Academy of Neurology described evidence for medical use in their areas. Literature is constantly changing, and possible new evidence can emerge in the next days or months. Prescription of these substances must be discussed with patients and their families, with knowledge about adverse events and their efficacy.

Endogenous opioid and cannabinoid systems modulate the muscle pain: A pharmacological study into the peripheral site

The participation of the peripheral opioid and cannabinoid endogenous systems in modulating muscle pain and inflammation has not been fully explored. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the involvement of these endogenous systems during muscular-tissue hyperalgesia induced by inflammation. Hyperalgesia was induced by carrageenan injection into the tibialis anterior muscles of male Wistar rats. We padronized an available Randal-Sellito test adaptation to evaluate nociceptive behavior elicited by mechanical insult in muscles. Western blot analysis was performed to evaluate the expression levels of opioid and cannabinoid receptors in the dorsal root ganglia. The non-selective opioid peptide receptor antagonist (naloxone) and the selective mu opioid receptor MOP (clocinnamox) and kappa opioid receptor KOP (nor-binaltorphimine) antagonists were able to intensify carrageenan-induced muscular hyperalgesia. On the other hand, the selective delta opioid receptor (DOP) antagonist (naltrindole) did not present any effect on nociceptive behavior. Moreover, the selective inhibitor of aminopeptidases (Bestatin) provoked considerable dose-dependent analgesia when intramuscularly injected into the hyperalgesic muscle. The CB₁ receptor antagonist (AM251), but not the CB₂ receptor antagonist (AM630), intensified muscle hyperalgesia. All irreversible inhibitors of anandamide hydrolase (MAFP), the inhibitor for monoacylglycerol lipase (JZL184) and the anandamide reuptake inhibitor (VDM11) decreased carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia in muscular tissue. Lastly, MOP, KOP and CB₁ expression levels in DRG were baseline even after muscular injection with carrageenan. The endogenous opioid and cannabinoid systems participate in peripheral muscle pain control through the activation of MOP, KOP and CB₁ receptors.

Pathophysiology of musculoskeletal pain: a narrative review

Musculoskeletal pain (excluding bone cancer pain) affects more than 30% of the global population and imposes an enormous burden on patients, families, and caregivers related to functional limitation, emotional distress, effects on mood, loss of independence, and reduced quality of life. The pathogenic mechanisms of musculoskeletal pain relate to the differential sensory innervation of bones, joints, and muscles as opposed to skin and involve a number of peripheral and central nervous system cells and mediators. The interplay of neurons and non-neural cells (e.g. glial, mesenchymal, and immune cells) amplifies and sensitizes pain signals in a manner that leads to cortical remodeling. Moreover, sex, age, mood, and social factors, together with beliefs, thoughts, and pain behaviors influence the way in which musculoskeletal pain manifests and is understood and assessed. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the different pathogenic mechanisms underlying musculoskeletal pain and how these mechanisms interact to promote the transition from acute to chronic pain.

Characterization of cannabis use by patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1: A pilot study

The treatment of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) focuses on reducing symptom burden. However, since medication often fails to produce satisfying symptom relief, some patients seek alternatives, such as cannabis, to help reduce some of these symptoms. The aim of this study was to provide an accurate profile of cannabis use among DM1 patients. Phone interviews were conducted to identify current and former users, and to assess reasons for cannabis use. Characteristics of cannabis use were also investigated. Briefly, among the 72 study participants, 22.2% currently used cannabis and a majority of them (56.9%) reported using it to relieve symptoms associated with DM1. These users, classified as therapeutic users, reported poorer health status (EQ-5D index scores: 0.532±0.230 vs. 0.823±0.208, p = 0.020; EQ-VAS scale 50.56±10.74 vs. 75.57±21.50, p = 0.009) than non-therapeutic users. Finally, differences among sex were also highlighted. While the therapeutic effects of cannabis were not explored in our study, our results support the potential role of cannabis and cannabinoids in the treatment of DM1-associated symptoms which will need to be thoroughly investigated.

Mu-Opioid Receptors in Ganglia, But Not in Muscle, Mediate Peripheral Analgesia in Rat Muscle Pain

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the participation of peripheral μ-opioid receptors (MOR) in the antinociceptive effect of systemically administered morphine and loperamide in an orofacial muscle pain model, induced by hypertonic saline, but not in a spinally innervated one, in rats. In this study, we determine whether this peripheral antinociceptive effect is due to the activation of MOR localized in the muscle, ganglia, or both.

METHODS

To determine the local antinociceptive effect of morphine and loperamide, 2 models of acute muscle pain (trigeminal and spinal) were used. Also, to study the MOR expression, protein quantification was performed in the trigeminal and spinal ganglia, and in the muscles.

RESULTS

The behavioral results show that the intramuscular injection of morphine and loperamide did not exert an antinociceptive effect in either muscle (morphine: P = .63, loperamide: P = .9). On the other hand, MOR expression was found in the ganglia but not in the muscles. This expression was on average 44% higher (95% confidence interval, 33.3-53.9) in the trigeminal ganglia than in the spinal one.

CONCLUSIONS

The peripheral antinociceptive effect of systemically administered opioids may be due to the activation of MOR in ganglia. The greater expression of MOR in trigeminal ganglia could explain the higher antinociceptive effect of opioids in orofacial muscle pain than in spinal muscle pain. Therefore, peripheral opioids could represent a promising approach for the treatment of orofacial pain.

Comparison of the antinociceptive profiles of morphine and oxycodone in two models of inflammatory and osteoarthritic pain in rat

Oxycodone and morphine are two opioid drugs commonly used for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. However, their use in the management of noncancer pain remains a controversial issue and, in this respect, the evidence on their effectiveness and safety, particularly in osteoarthritis, is being questioned. In order to analyse their analgesic profile, two different pain models in rats were used: the formalin-induced inflammatory pain and the monosodium iodoacetate (MIA)-induced knee osteoarthritic pain. Drugs were administered systemically (i.p.) and their antinociceptive effect and potency were assessed. In the formalin test, both morphine and oxycodone produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, but oxycodone outdid morphine in terms of effectiveness and potency (nearly two times) in the early (acute nociceptive) as in the late phase (inflammatory). In the osteoarthritis model, both drugs reduced movement-evoked pain (knee-bend test), mechanical allodynia (von Frey test) and heat hyperalgesia (Plantar test). Pretreatment with naloxone and naloxone methiodide reduced morphine and oxycodone effects. Peripheral mu-opioid receptors play a crucial role in the antinociceptive effect of both drugs on movement-evoked pain and heat hyperalgesia, but not on tactile allodynia. The main finding of our study is that oxycodone has a better antinociceptive profile in the inflammatory and osteoarthritic pain, being more effective than morphine at 14 days post-MIA injection (phase with neuropathic pain); it overcame the morphine effect by improving the movement-induced pain, tactile allodynia and heat hyperalgesia. Therefore, oxycodone could be an interesting option to treat patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis when opioids are required.

The Cannabinoids Δ8THC, CBD, and HU-308 Act via Distinct Receptors to Reduce Corneal Pain and Inflammation

Background and Purpose: Corneal injury can result in dysfunction of corneal nociceptive signaling and corneal sensitization. Activation of the endocannabinoid system has been reported to be analgesic and anti-inflammatory. The purpose of this research was to investigate the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of cannabinoids with reported actions at cannabinoid 1 (CB₁R) and cannabinoid 2 (CB₂R) receptors and/or noncannabinoid receptors in an experimental model of corneal hyperalgesia.

Methods: Corneal hyperalgesia (increased pain response) was generated using chemical cauterization of the corneal epithelium in wild-type (WT) and CB₂R knockout (CB₂R^−/−) mice. Cauterized eyes were treated topically with the phytocannabinoids Δ⁸-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁸THC) or cannabidiol (CBD), or the CBD derivative HU-308, in the presence or absence of the CB₁R antagonist AM251 (2.0 mg/kg i.p.), or the 5-HT_1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 (1 mg/kg i.p.). Behavioral pain responses to a topical capsaicin challenge at 6 h postinjury were quantified from video recordings. Mice were euthanized at 6 and 12 h postcorneal injury for immunohistochemical analysis to quantify corneal neutrophil infiltration.

Results: Corneal cauterization resulted in hyperalgesia to capsaicin at 6 h postinjury compared to sham control eyes. Neutrophil infiltration, indicative of inflammation, was apparent at 6 and 12 h postinjury in WT mice. Application of Δ⁸THC, CBD, and HU-308 reduced the pain score and neutrophil infiltration in WT mice. The antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory actions of Δ⁸THC, but not CBD, were blocked by the CB₁R antagonist AM251, but were still apparent, for both cannabinoids, in CB₂R^−/− mice. However, the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory actions of HU-308 were absent in the CB₂R^−/− mice. The antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of CBD were blocked by the 5-HT_1A antagonist WAY100635.

Conclusion: Topical cannabinoids reduce corneal hyperalgesia and inflammation. The antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of Δ⁸THC are mediated primarily via CB₁R, whereas that of the cannabinoids CBD and HU-308, involve activation of 5-HT_1A receptors and CB₂Rs, respectively. Cannabinoids could be a novel clinical therapy for corneal pain and inflammation resulting from ocular surface injury.

Antinociceptive effects of HUF-101, a fluorinated cannabidiol derivative

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a phytocannabinoid with multiple pharmacological effects and several potential therapeutic properties. Its low oral bioavailability, however, can limit its clinical use. Preliminary results indicate that fluorination of the CBD molecule increases its pharmacological potency. Here, we investigated whether HUF-101 (3, 10, and 30mg/kg), a fluorinated CBD analogue, would induce antinociceptive effects. HUF-101 effects were compared to those induced by CBD (10, 30, and 90mg/kg) and the cannabinoid CB_1/2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (1, 3, and 5mg/kg). These drugs were tested in male Swiss mice submitted to the following models predictive to antinociceptive drugs: hot plate, acetic acid-induced writhing, and carrageenan-induced inflammatory hyperalgesia. To evaluate the involvement of CB₁ and CB₂ receptors in HUF-101 and CBD effects, mice received the CB₁ receptor antagonist AM251 (1 or 3mg/kg) or the CB₂ receptor antagonist AM630 (1 or 3mg/kg) 30min before HUF-101, CBD, or WIN55,212-2. In the hot plate test, HUF-101 (30mg/kg) and WIN55,212-2 (5mg/kg) induced antinociceptive effects, which were attenuated by the pretreatment with AM251 and AM630. In the abdominal writhing test, CBD (30 and 90mg/kg), HUF-101 (30mg/kg), and WIN55,212-2 (3 and 5mg/kg) induced antinociceptive effects indicated by a reduction in the number of writhing. Whereas the pretreatment with AM630 did not mitigate the effects induced by any drug in this test, the pretreatment with AM251 attenuated the effect caused by WIN55,212-2. In the carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia test, CBD (30 and 90mg/kg), HUF-101 (3, 10 and 30mg/kg) and WIN55,212-2 (1mg/kg) decreased the intensity of mechanical hyperalgesia measured by the electronic von Frey method. The effects of all compounds were attenuated by the pretreatment with AM251 and AM630. Additionally, we evaluated whether HUF-101 would induce the classic cannabinoid CB₁ receptor-mediated tetrad (hypolocomotion, catalepsy, hypothermia, and antinociception). Unlike WIN55,212-2, CBD and HUF-101 did not induce the cannabinoid tetrad. These findings show that HUF-101 produced antinociceptive effects at lower doses than CBD, indicating that the addition of fluoride improved its pharmacological profile. Furthermore, some of the antinociceptive effects of CBD and HUF-101 effects seem to involve the activation of CB₁ and CB₂ receptors.

From Phytocannabinoids to Cannabinoid Receptors and Endocannabinoids: Pleiotropic Physiological and Pathological Roles Through Complex Pharmacology

Apart from having been used and misused for at least four millennia for, among others, recreational and medicinal purposes, the cannabis plant and its most peculiar chemical components, the plant cannabinoids (phytocannabinoids), have the merit to have led humanity to discover one of the most intriguing and pleiotropic endogenous signaling systems, the endocannabinoid system (ECS). This review article aims to describe and critically discuss, in the most comprehensive possible manner, the multifaceted aspects of 1) the pharmacology and potential impact on mammalian physiology of all major phytocannabinoids, and not only of the most famous one Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, and 2) the adaptive pro-homeostatic physiological, or maladaptive pathological, roles of the ECS in mammalian cells, tissues, and organs. In doing so, we have respected the chronological order of the milestones of the millennial route from medicinal/recreational cannabis to the ECS and beyond, as it is now clear that some of the early steps in this long path, which were originally neglected, are becoming important again. The emerging picture is rather complex, but still supports the belief that more important discoveries on human physiology, and new therapies, might come in the future from new knowledge in this field.