1
|
Ghezzi A. Old and New Strategies in the Treatment of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: A Personal View for a New Treatment Approach. Neurol Ther 2024:10.1007/s40120-024-00633-6. [PMID: 38822947 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-024-00633-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Up to 10 years ago the most common approach to the treatment of pediatric MS (ped-MS) was to start with IFNB or GA (so-called first-line therapies or moderate-efficacy disease-modifying therapies [ME-DMTs]) and to switch to more aggressive treatments (or high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies [HE-DMTs]) in non-responder patients. The use of HE-DMTs as first choice was recommended in selected cases with an active, aggressive form of MS. Indications for the treatment of ped-MS were essentially derived from data of observational studies. Recently, results of three randomized clinical trials have been published as well as data from many observational studies evaluating the effect of new and more active DMTs, with clear evidence that HE-DMTs are more effective than ME-DMTs. Therefore, the paradigm of treatment for patients with MS onset before 18 years of age should be changed, offering treatment with HE-DMTs as first option, because of their superior effectiveness to prevent relapses and disease progression. HE-DMTs present an overall reassuring safety profile and obtain better adherence to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Ghezzi
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università Piemonte Orientale A. Avogadro, Via Solaroli 17, 28100, Novara, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palavra F, Geria L, Jorge A, Marques M, dos Santos CS, Amaral J, Ribeiro JA, Pereira C, Robalo C. Neutrophil/lymphocyte and monocyte/lymphocyte indexes as potential predictors of relapse at 1 year after diagnosis of pediatric multiple sclerosis: a single-center, exploratory and proof-of-concept study. Front Neurosci 2024; 17:1305176. [PMID: 38287987 PMCID: PMC10822923 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1305176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Early identification of patients with a more unfavorable outcome in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is crucial to optimize individualized treatment. Neutrophil-lymphocyte index (NLI) and monocyte-lymphocyte index (MLI) have been considered as potential biomarkers for disease prognosis. Our study aims to investigate the usefulness of NLI and MLI as predictors of relapse, disability progression, and lesion accumulation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1 year after diagnosis and treatment initiation, in pediatric-onset MS. Methods A retrospective single-center study was conducted, including patients with diagnosis of MS established in pediatric age (<18 years old), at least 1-year of follow-up, and a complete blood count (CBC) performed at diagnosis. We collected the nearest-to-diagnosis NLI and MLI, as well as clinical and imaging variables, at diagnosis and 12 months later. Our cohort was further dichotomized into two groups, based on the presence of relapses. Statistical significance was considered for p < 0.05. Results Eighteen patients (n = 18) were included. The relapsing group had higher mean, minimum, and maximum values for both NLI (5.17 ± 5.85, range: 1.57-11.92) and MLI (0.35 ± 0.22, range: 0.19-0.59), compared to the non-relapsing group (2.19 ± 1.63, range: 1.12-7.32 for NLI, and 0.24 ± 0.09, range: 0.14-0.44 for MLI). A higher percentage of patients in the relapsing group had increased NLI (>1.89, 66.7%) and MLI (>0.21, 66.7%) values than those in the non-relapsing group (46.7%). Patients who presented new T2-hyperintense lesions on MRI after 1 year of follow-up also had higher mean, minimum, and maximum values of both biomarkers. Patients who did not achieve No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3) state exhibited higher values for both ratios. However, in our sample, no statistically significant correlations were found between MLI and NLI values and the clinical and imaging variables considered. Conclusion The ease of obtaining NLI and MLI from routine blood tests renders them useful biomarkers as a screening tool in longitudinal follow-up. Our study was based on a very small sample size, but it allowed us to verify the feasibility of the protocol used. It is intended to involve other centers in the next phase of this work, testing the possible usefulness of the indices under analysis on a larger sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipe Palavra
- Center for Child Development–Neuropediatrics Unit, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Laboratory of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Leonor Geria
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - André Jorge
- Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Margarida Marques
- Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Constança Soares dos Santos
- Center for Child Development–Neuropediatrics Unit, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joana Amaral
- Center for Child Development–Neuropediatrics Unit, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joana Afonso Ribeiro
- Center for Child Development–Neuropediatrics Unit, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Cristina Pereira
- Center for Child Development–Neuropediatrics Unit, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Conceição Robalo
- Center for Child Development–Neuropediatrics Unit, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
VanHeyst KA, Choi SH, Kingsley DT, Huang AY. Ectopic Tumor VCAM-1 Expression in Cancer Metastasis and Therapy Resistance. Cells 2022; 11:cells11233922. [PMID: 36497180 PMCID: PMC9735769 DOI: 10.3390/cells11233922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (VCAM-1; CD106) is a membrane protein that contributes critical physiologic functional roles in cellular immune response, including leukocyte extravasation in inflamed and infected tissues. Expressed as a cell membrane protein, VCAM-1 can also be cleaved from the cell surface into a soluble form (sVCAM-1). The integrin α4β1 (VLA-4) was identified as the first major ligand for VCAM-1. Ongoing studies suggest that, in addition to mediating physiologic immune functions, VCAM-1/VLA-4 signaling plays an increasingly vital role in the metastatic progression of various tumors. Additionally, elevated concentrations of sVCAM-1 have been found in the peripheral blood of patients with cancer, suggesting the tumor microenvironment (TME) as the source of sVCAM-1. Furthermore, over-expression of VLA-4 was linked to tumor progression in various malignancies when VCAM-1 was also up-regulated. This review explores the functional role of VCAM-1 expression in cancer metastasis and therapy resistance, and the potential for the disruption of VCAM-1/VLA-4 signaling as a novel immunotherapeutic approach in cancer, including osteosarcoma, which disproportionately affects the pediatric, adolescent and young adult population, as an unmet medical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen A. VanHeyst
- Center for Pediatric Immunotherapy at Rainbow, Angie Fowler AYA Cancer Institute, Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, UH Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Sung Hee Choi
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | | | - Alex Y. Huang
- Center for Pediatric Immunotherapy at Rainbow, Angie Fowler AYA Cancer Institute, Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, UH Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-216-368-1271
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Constantinescu V, Akgün K, Ziemssen T. Current status and new developments in sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor antagonism: fingolimod and more. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2022; 18:675-693. [PMID: 36260948 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2022.2138330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fingolimod was the first oral disease-modifying treatment approved for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) that serves as a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) agonist. The efficacy is primarily mediated by S1PR subtype 1 activation, leading to agonist-induced down-modulation of receptor expression and further functional antagonism, blocking the egression of auto-aggressive lymphocytes from the lymph nodes in the peripheral compartment. The role of S1P signaling in the regulation of other pathways in human organisms through different S1PR subtypes has received much attention due to its immune-modulatory function and its significance for the regeneration of the central nervous system (CNS). The more selective second-generation S1PR modulators have improved safety and tolerability profiles. AREAS COVERED This review has been carried out based on current data on S1PR modulators, emphasizing the benefits of recent advances in this emergent class of immunomodulatory treatment for MS. EXPERT OPINION Ongoing clinical research suggests that S1PR modulators represent an alternative to first-line therapies in selected cases of MS. A better understanding of the relevance of selective S1PR pathways and the ambition to optimize selective modulation has improved the safety and tolerability of S1PR modulators in MS therapy and opened new perspectives for the treatment of other diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Constantinescu
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Fetscher Str. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Katja Akgün
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Fetscher Str. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Tjalf Ziemssen
- Center of Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital, Fetscher Str. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews the clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prognosis of the most common monophasic and relapsing acquired demyelinating disorders presenting in childhood. RECENT FINDINGS Our understanding of neuroimmune disorders of the central nervous system is rapidly expanding. Several clinical and paraclinical factors help to inform the diagnosis and ultimately the suspicion for a monophasic versus relapsing course, including the age of the patient (prepubertal versus postpubertal), presence or absence of clinical encephalopathy, identification of serum autoantibodies (eg, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein [MOG] and aquaporin-4), presence of intrathecally unique oligoclonal bands, and location/extent of radiologic abnormalities. Collaborative international research efforts have facilitated understanding of the safety and efficacy of currently available immunotherapies in children with acquired demyelinating disorders, particularly multiple sclerosis. SUMMARY Although many of the demyelinating disorders presented in this article can affect children and adults across the age spectrum, the clinical and radiologic phenotypes, treatment considerations, and long-term prognoses are often distinct in children.
Collapse
|
6
|
Baroncini D, Ghezzi A, Guaschino C, Moiola L, Filippi M, Ianniello A, Pozzilli C, Lanzillo R, Brescia-Morra V, Margoni M, Gallo P, Callari G, Grimaldi L, Lus G, Calabrese M, Simone M, Marfia GA, Rasia S, Cargnelutti D, Comi G, Zaffaroni M, Trojano M, Centonze D, Capra R, Capobianco M, Laroni A, Uccelli A, Gallo A, Patti F, Danni MC, Gasperini C, Coniglio G. Long-term follow-up (up to 11 years) of an Italian pediatric MS cohort treated with Natalizumab: a multicenter, observational study. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:6415-6423. [PMID: 35781765 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06211-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Natalizumab (NAT) has a strong impact on disease activity of aggressive pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS), with no difference in safety profile compared to adult MS. However, available data are limited by short follow-up. Our aim was to report long-term follow-up data (up to 11 years) of a large Italian pediatric MS cohort treated with NAT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively collected data of pediatric MS patients treated with NAT included in a previous study and prospectively followed in Italian MS centers. We compared disease activity pre, during, and post-NAT and we performed survival analyses of time to evidence of disease activity (EDA) during NAT, time to reach EDA post-NAT, and time to NAT discontinuation. RESULTS Ninety-two patients were included from 19 MS centers in Italy. At NAT initiation, cohort's characteristics were as follows: 55 females; 14.7 ± 2.4 (mean ± SD) years of age; 34 naïve to disease modifying therapies; 1-year pre-NAT annualized relapse rate (ARR): 2.2 ± 1.2; EDSS (median [IQR]): 2.5 [2.0-3.0]; gadolinium-enhancing lesions: 2 [1-5]; 41 JCV positives. During NAT treatment (61.9 ± 35.2 mean infusions), ARR lowered to 0.08 ± 0.23 (p < 0.001), EDSS score to 1.5 [1.0-2.5] at last infusion (p < 0.001), and 51% patients had EDA (21% after 6 months of rebaseline). No serious adverse events were reported. Forty-nine patients discontinued NAT, mainly due to PML concern; the majority (29/49) had disease reactivation in the subsequent 12 months, of which three with a clinical rebound. CONCLUSION NAT treatment maintains its high efficacy for a long time in pediatric MS patients, with no new safety issues.
Collapse
|
7
|
Graves JS, Thomas M, Li J, Shah AR, Goodyear A, Lange MR, Schmidli H, Häring DA, Friede T, Gärtner J. Improving pediatric multiple sclerosis interventional phase III study design: a meta-analysis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022; 15:17562864211070449. [PMID: 35514529 PMCID: PMC9066624 DOI: 10.1177/17562864211070449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To support innovative trial designs in a regulatory setting for pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (MS), the study aimed to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of relapse rates with interferon β (IFN β), fingolimod, and natalizumab and thereby demonstrate potential benefits of Bayesian and non-inferiority designs in this population. Methods: We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until 17 June 2020 of all studies reporting annualized relapse rates (ARR) in IFN β-, fingolimod-, or natalizumab-treated patients with pediatric-onset relapsing–remitting MS. These interventions were chosen because the literature was mainly available for these treatments, and they are currently used for the treatment of pediatric MS. Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care – Quality Assessment Tool. The meta-analysis estimates were obtained by Bayesian random effects model. Data were summarized as ARR point estimates and 95% credible intervals. Results: We found 19 articles, including 2 randomized controlled trials. The baseline ARR reported was between 1.4 and 3.7. The meta-analysis-based ARR was significantly higher in IFN β-treated patients (0.69, 95% credible interval: 0.51–0.91) versus fingolimod (0.11, 0.04–0.27) and natalizumab (0.17, 0.09–0.31). Based on the meta-analysis results, an appropriate non-inferiority margin versus fingolimod could be in the range of 2.29–2.67 and for natalizumab 1.72–2.29 on the ARR ratio scale. A Bayesian design, which uses historical information for a fingolimod or natalizumab control arm, could reduce the sample size of a new trial by 18 or 14 patients, respectively. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that relapse rates are considerably higher with IFNs versus fingolimod or natalizumab. The results support the use of innovative Bayesian or non-inferiority designs to avoid exposing patients to less effective comparators in trials and bringing new medications to patients more efficiently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S. Graves
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, Box 0662 ACTRI, 9452 Medical Center Drive, Suite 4W-222, San Diego, CA 92037, USA
| | | | - Jun Li
- Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Alexandra Goodyear
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA at the time of article development
| | | | | | | | - Tim Friede
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jutta Gärtner
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, German Center for Multiple Sclerosis in Childhood and Adolescence, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Natalizumab therapy in patients with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis in Greece: clinical and immunological insights of time-long administration and future directions-a single-center retrospective observational study. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2022; 395:933-943. [PMID: 35471586 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-022-02238-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (MS, POMS) accounts for 3-5% of all MS cases and is characterized by a highly inflammatory profile, often warranting treatment with high-efficacy agents. Our aim is to present real-world data of a series of 18 Hellenic POMS patients treated with natalizumab (NTZ) either as adolescents or as adults, after high disease activity has efficiently subsided. Clinical and imaging/laboratory data from 18 POMS patients who have received at least one NTZ infusion were selected in this single-center retrospective observational study. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping was performed with standard low-resolution sequence-specific oligonucleotide techniques. Eighteen patients with a mean age of disease onset of 15.3 ± 2.4 years were treated with NTZ with a mean of 51.7 ± 46.4 infusions, 6 as adolescents and 12 as adults. 22.2% were treatment naïve. At the end of the observational period, patients of both groups remained relapse-free, with no radiological activity and significantly reduced disability accumulation. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3 status was achieved in 66.7% of all patients, 58.3% in the adult-treated, and 83.3% in the adolescent-treated POMS patients. NTZ was generally well tolerated. Only 5 adverse events were observed, in 3 patients who were carriers of the HLA-DRB1*15 (HLA-DRB1*15/HLA-DRB1*11 and HLA-DRB1*15/HLA-DRB1*13 genotypes), 1 homozygous for the HLA-DRB1*03 allele and 1 heterozygous for HLA-DRB1*04 and HLA-DRB1*16 alleles. NTZ is highly efficacious and mostly safe for POMS patients with high disease activity in all age groups. The role of immunogenetics in personalized patient evaluation and treatment needs to be further investigated.
Collapse
|
9
|
Treatment of multiple sclerosis in children: A brief overview. Clin Immunol 2022; 237:108947. [PMID: 35123059 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2022.108947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common autoimmune, chronic inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system. Pediatric-onset MS (POMS), as opposed to adult-onset MS (AOMS), is a rare condition, presenting similar clinical features to AOMS, but a more active course of the disease, with higher relapse rates and greater white and grey matter damage. To date, the therapeutic approaches to treat POMS have been extrapolated from observational studies and data from trials conducted on adults, raising concerns about their efficacy and safety in the pediatric population. Herein, we discuss the most common therapeutic strategies used in POMS management, basing on the individual clinical practice and experience.
Collapse
|
10
|
Menascu S, Fattal-Valevski A, Vaknin-Dembinsky A, Milo R, Geva K, Magalashvili D, Dolev M, Flecther S, Kalron A, Miron S, Hoffmann C, Aloni R, Gurevich M, Achiron A. Effect of natalizumab treatment on the rate of No Evidence of Disease Activity in young adults with multiple sclerosis in relation to pubertal stage. J Neurol Sci 2022; 432:120074. [PMID: 34875473 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.120074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 40% of young-onset multiple sclerosis (MS) patients experience breakthrough disease, which carries a high risk for long-term disability, and requires using therapies beyond traditional first-line agents. Despite the increasing use of newer disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in this population, data are not available to guide the need for escalating DMTs and there is a scarcity of data on the effects of natalizumab in children and young adults with active disease. We performed a retrospective analysis of the rate of No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA), tolerability, and safety of natalizumab in a multi-center cohort of 36 children and young adults with highly active MS. All patients had active disease and initiated treatment with natalizumab. The primary endpoint was the rate of achieving NEDA-3 status, within two years of natalizumab treatment. To examine a possible effect of age on the outcome of treatment, outcomes were also analyzed by pre-pubertal (n = 13 children aged 9-13 years) and pubertal subgroups (n = 23 young adolescents aged 14-20 years). The NEDA-3 status of the pre-pubertal group was 92% in the first and second year and in the pubertal group - 96% in the first year and 92% in the second year. Natalizumab reduced the number and volume of brain lesions in both pre-pubertal and pubertal groups. Treatment was well-tolerated, only 8 patients (22.2%) had adverse events during the 2-year study period. Our analysis shows that natalizumab is effective and well-tolerated in pre-pubertal and pubertal MS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shay Menascu
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Aviva Fattal-Valevski
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Pediatric Neurology Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Ron Milo
- Department of Neurology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Keren Geva
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Pediatric Neurology Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, Israel
| | - David Magalashvili
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mark Dolev
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shlomo Flecther
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Department of Neurology, Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Be'er Ya'akov, Israel
| | - Alon Kalron
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shmulik Miron
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Chen Hoffmann
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Radiology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Roy Aloni
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Michael Gurevich
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Anat Achiron
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guery D, Marignier R, Durand-Dubief F, Lavie C, Pique J, Guerrier O, Vukusic S. Clinical failure of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: Specific causes and strategy. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2021; 177:1241-1249. [PMID: 34176658 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.02.393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Natalizumab is a very effective treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). Failure is rare and should lead to consider some specific etiologies. The purpose of our study was to describe causes of subacute neurological events under natalizumab. METHODS Observational single-center retrospective study in the MS expert center of Lyon, France. INCLUSION CRITERIA any patient with definite MS who received at least three infusions of natalizumab between April 2007 and February 2017. Clinical data were extracted from the Lyon EDMUS/OFSEP database. Events of interest: occurrence of a subacute neurological deficit, characterized by new clinical symptoms. We excluded pseudo-relapses and progression. FINDINGS A subacute neurological deficit occurred in 35 cases, for 607 patients treated with natalizumab. Ten patients presented natalizumab antibodies, nine had progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), five presented an isolated subacute neurological deficit and two had AQP4 antibodies. No myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies were found. INTERPRETATION The occurrence of an acute or subacute neurological deficit with natalizumab is rarely a MS relapse and should lead systematically to explore some important alternate etiologies, eliminating PML first.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Guery
- Service de neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France
| | - R Marignier
- Service de neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France; Inserm 1028 et CNRS UMR5292, Centre des neurosciences de Lyon, FLUID Team, 69003 Lyon, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, faculté de médecine Lyon Est, 69000 Lyon, France
| | - F Durand-Dubief
- Service de neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France; CREATIS, Lyon, France
| | - C Lavie
- Service de neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France
| | - J Pique
- Service de neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France
| | - O Guerrier
- Service de neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France
| | - S Vukusic
- Service de neurologie, sclérose en plaques, pathologies de la myéline et neuro-inflammation, hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, hospices civils de Lyon, 69677 Lyon/Bron, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, faculté de médecine Lyon Est, 69000 Lyon, France; Inserm 1028 et CNRS UMR5292, Centre des neurosciences de Lyon, Observatoire français de la sclérose en plaques, 69003 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baroncini D, Simone M, Iaffaldano P, Brescia Morra V, Lanzillo R, Filippi M, Romeo M, Patti F, Chisari CG, Cocco E, Fenu G, Salemi G, Ragonese P, Inglese M, Cellerino M, Margari L, Comi G, Zaffaroni M, Ghezzi A. Risk of Persistent Disability in Patients With Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78:726-735. [PMID: 33938921 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Availability of new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and changes of therapeutic paradigms have led to a general improvement of multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis in adults. It is still unclear whether this improvement also involves patients with pediatric-onset MS (POMS), whose early management is more challenging. Objective To evaluate changes in the prognosis of POMS over time in association with changes in therapeutic and managing standards. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Data were extracted and collected in May 2019 from the Italian MS Registry, a digital database including more than 59 000 patients. Inclusion criteria were MS onset before age 18 years, diagnosis before January 2014, and disease duration of at least 3 years. Exclusion criteria were primary progressive MS, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of at least 8 one year after onset, unavailability of diagnosis date, and less than 2 EDSS score evaluations. Eligible patients were 4704 patients with POMS. According to these criteria, we enrolled 3198 patients, excluding 1506. Exposures We compared time to reach disability milestones by epoch of MS diagnosis (<1993, 1993-1999, 2000-2006, and 2007-2013), adjusting for possible confounders linked to EDSS evaluations and clinical disease activity. We then analyzed the difference among the 4 diagnosis epochs regarding demographic characteristics, clinical disease activity at onset, and DMTs management. Main Outcomes and Measures Disability milestones were EDSS score 4.0 and 6.0, confirmed in the following clinical evaluation and in the last available visit. Results We enrolled 3198 patients with POMS (mean age at onset, 15.2 years; 69% female; median time to diagnosis, 3.2 years; annualized relapse rate in first 1 and 3 years, 1.3 and 0.6, respectively), with a mean (SD) follow-up of 21.8 (11.7) years. Median survival times to reach EDSS score of 4.0 and 6.0 were 31.7 and 40.5 years. The cumulative risk of reaching disability milestones gradually decreased over time, both for EDSS score of 4.0 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.83 in 1993-1999; HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.38-0.60 in 2000-2006; and HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.59 in 2007-2013) and 6.0 (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.90; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.60; and HR, 0.30; 0.20-0.46). In later diagnosis epochs, a greater number of patients with POMS were treated with DMTs, especially high-potency drugs, that were given earlier and for a longer period. Demographic characteristics and clinical disease activity at onset did not change significantly over time. Conclusions and Relevance In POMS, the risk of persistent disability has been reduced by 50% to 70% in recent diagnosis epochs, probably owing to improvement in therapeutic and managing standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Baroncini
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate (VA), Italy
| | - Marta Simone
- Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro," Bari, Italy
| | - Pietro Iaffaldano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro," Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Brescia Morra
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Center, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Lanzillo
- Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Care and Research Center, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, MS Center, and Neuroimaging Research Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marzia Romeo
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Patti
- Policlinico Catania, Department of Medical, Surgery Science and Advanced Technology "GF Ingrassia," Section of Neurosciences, MS Center, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Clara Grazia Chisari
- Policlinico Catania, Department of Medical, Surgery Science and Advanced Technology "GF Ingrassia," Section of Neurosciences, MS Center, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Eleonora Cocco
- Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari and Multiple Sclerosis Center, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fenu
- Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari and Multiple Sclerosis Center, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Salemi
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences, and advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Paolo Ragonese
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences, and advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Matilde Inglese
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Cellerino
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lucia Margari
- Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro," Bari, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate (VA), Italy.,Institute of Experimental Neurology and Multiple Sclerosis Center IRCCS, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Zaffaroni
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate (VA), Italy
| | - Angelo Ghezzi
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Gallarate Hospital, ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate (VA), Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Margoni M, Rinaldi F, Perini P, Gallo P. Therapy of Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities. Front Neurol 2021; 12:676095. [PMID: 34079516 PMCID: PMC8165183 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.676095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) has been tailored after observational studies and data obtained from clinical trials in adult-onset multiple sclerosis (AOMS) patients. There are an increasing number of new therapeutic agents for AOMS, and many will be formally studied for use also in POMS. However, there are important efficacy and safety concerns regarding the use of these therapies in children and young adults. This review will discuss the current state of the art of POMS therapy and will focus on the newer therapies (oral and infusion disease-modifying drugs) and on those still currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Margoni
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of the Veneto Region (CeSMuV), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Padova Neuroscience Centre, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesca Rinaldi
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of the Veneto Region (CeSMuV), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Paola Perini
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of the Veneto Region (CeSMuV), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Gallo
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of the Veneto Region (CeSMuV), University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Medical School, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Palavra F, Figueiroa S, Correia AS, Tapadinhas F, Cerqueira J, Guerreiro RP, de Sá J, Sá MJ, Almeida S, Mota P, Sousa L. TyPed study: Natalizumab for the treatment of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis in Portugal. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 51:102865. [PMID: 33714125 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A significant proportion of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) patients do not respond to first-line disease-modifying therapies. Clinical trials showed that natalizumab is effective and safe in adults, but there are limited clinical trial data for children. Natalizumab is currently prescribed off-label for POMS. We aimed to characterize the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of natalizumab in all POMS cases treated in Portugal (from 2007 to 2018). METHODS Data from clinical records were retrospectively collected for all POMS cases treated with natalizumab in Portugal. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were included, 14 (67%) of which were female. The median age at POMS diagnosis was 13 years old. The median duration of treatment with natalizumab was 2 years and 3 months. Median Expanded Disability Status Scale score decreased from 1.5 to 1.0 after 24 months. The Annualized Relapse Rate decreased from 1.31 events/patient/year before treatment with natalizumab to 0 after 12 months of treatment and to 0.04 after 24 months. No gadolinium-enhancing lesions or new or enlarged T2 hyperintense lesions were observed in 8/8 patients (100%) after 12 months, and 4/5 (80%) after 24 months. There was one possible serious adverse event, which did not require dose adjustment. Five patients discontinued treatment due to positive anti-JCV (JC virus) antibody JC serostatus. CONCLUSION Natalizumab may be an effective and safe disease-modifying therapy for POMS. Our results are in line with data published for the adult population, as well as with similar observational studies in pediatric populations in other regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipe Palavra
- Centre for Child Development - Neuropediatrics Unit, Hospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra; Laboratory of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Sónia Figueiroa
- Neuropediatrics Unit, Centro Materno-Infantil do Norte, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Sofia Correia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental; CEDOC, Nova Medical School/Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Fernando Tapadinhas
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital de Faro, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
| | - João Cerqueira
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Braga; 2CA - Clinical Academic Centre Braga; School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Rui Pedro Guerreiro
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de São Bernardo, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
| | - João de Sá
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Maria José Sá
- Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João; Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Lívia Sousa
- Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fingolimod in pediatric multiple sclerosis: three case reports. Neurol Sci 2021; 42:19-23. [PMID: 33483884 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05076-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Treatment for pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) currently reflects treatment for adult-onset MS, despite some differences in its clinical course. First-choice treatment of POMS generally consists of interferon β-1a or glatiramer acetate, with therapies such as natalizumab or fingolimod reserved for second-choice treatment. In cases of severe disease, both fingolimod and natalizumab can be considered first-choice therapy. This paper presents three case histories of patients with POMS and highlights the different uses of fingolimod within the POMS treatment algorithm. The first and third cases are examples of escalation therapy, both in females aged 16 to 17 years, with fingolimod administering as second choice following disease progression. The second case is an example of using fingolimod as first-choice therapy, given to a 12-year-old male with severe disease. In all three cases, over a period of approximately 1 year after the initiation of fingolimod treatment, there was no further disease progression and no adverse events were recorded.
Collapse
|
16
|
Ghezzi A, Amato MP, Edan G, Hartung HP, Havrdová EK, Kappos L, Montalban X, Pozzilli C, Sorensen PS, Trojano M, Vermersch P, Comi G. The introduction of new medications in pediatric multiple sclerosis: Open issues and challenges. Mult Scler 2020; 27:479-482. [PMID: 32539596 DOI: 10.1177/1352458520930620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been evaluated in pediatric patients in observational studies demonstrating a similar, even better clinical effect compared to adults, with a similar safety. Only fingolimod has been tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and is approved for pediatric multiple sclerosis (ped-MS). Numerous methodological, practical, and ethical issues underline that RCTs are difficult to conduct in ped-MS. This also creates a lack of safety information. To facilitate the availability of new agents in ped-MS, we encourage to develop a different approach based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies to yield information on optimal doses and implementation of obligatory registries to obtain information on safety as primary endpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Ghezzi
- Centro Studi Sclerosi Multipla, Ospedale di Gallarate, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Amato
- Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy
| | - Gilles Edan
- CIC 1414 INSERM, Department of Neurology, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Hans-Peter Hartung
- Department of Neurology, UKD and Center of Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Eva Kubala Havrdová
- Department of Neurology and Center for Clinical Neuroscience, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Xavier Montalban
- St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Neurology, Cemcat, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlo Pozzilli
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Per Soelber Sorensen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Copenhagen University and Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Trojano
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Patrich Vermersch
- University of Lille, INSERM UMR-S1172, CHU Lille, FHU Imminent, Lille, France
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Istituto di Neurologia Sperimentale (INSPE), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Krysko KM, Graves JS, Rensel M, Weinstock-Guttman B, Rutatangwa A, Aaen G, Belman A, Benson L, Chitnis T, Gorman M, Goyal MS, Harris Y, Krupp L, Lotze T, Mar S, Moodley M, Ness J, Rodriguez M, Rose J, Schreiner T, Tillema JM, Waltz M, Casper TC, Waubant E. Real-World Effectiveness of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapies in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2020; 88:42-55. [PMID: 32267005 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess real-world effectiveness of initial treatment with newer compared to injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on disease activity in pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). METHODS This is a cohort study of children with MS/CIS followed at 12 clinics in the US Network of Pediatric MS Centers, who received initial therapy with newer (fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab) or injectable (interferon-β, glatiramer acetate) DMTs. Propensity scores (PSs) were computed, including preidentified confounders. Relapse rate while on initial DMT was modeled with negative binomial regression, adjusted for PS-quintile. Time to new/enlarging T2-hyperintense and gadolinium-enhancing lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging were modeled with midpoint survival analyses, adjusted for PS-quintile. RESULTS A total of 741 children began therapy before 18 years, 197 with newer and 544 with injectable DMTs. Those started on newer DMTs were older (15.2 vs injectable 14.4 years, p = 0.001) and less likely to have a monofocal presentation. In PS-quintile-adjusted analysis, those on newer DMTs had a lower relapse rate than those on injectables (rate ratio = 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.29-0.70, p < 0.001; rate difference = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.14-0.40, p = 0.004). One would need to treat with newer rather than injectable DMTs for 3.7 person-years to prevent 1 relapse. Those started on newer DMTs had a lower rate of new/enlarging T2 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.36-0.72, p < 0.001) and gadolinium-enhancing lesions (HR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.23-0.63, p < 0.001) than those on injectables. INTERPRETATION Initial treatment of pediatric MS/CIS with newer DMTs led to better disease activity control compared to injectables, supporting greater effectiveness of newer therapies. Long-term safety data for newer DMTs are required. ANN NEUROL 2020 ANN NEUROL 2020;88:42-55.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen M Krysko
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jennifer S Graves
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Neurology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Mary Rensel
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Alice Rutatangwa
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Gregory Aaen
- Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University, San Bernardino, CA
| | - Anita Belman
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Leslie Benson
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Tanuja Chitnis
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark Gorman
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Manu S Goyal
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Yolanda Harris
- Department of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Lauren Krupp
- Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Timothy Lotze
- Department of Neurology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Soe Mar
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Manikum Moodley
- Department of Pediatrics and Neurology, Dell Children's Hospital, University of Texas, Austin, TX
| | - Jayne Ness
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - John Rose
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Teri Schreiner
- Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Michael Waltz
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - T Charles Casper
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Emmanuelle Waubant
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
No evidence of disease activity including cognition (NEDA-3 plus) in naïve pediatric multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab. J Neurol 2019; 267:100-105. [PMID: 31562558 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09554-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by high inflammatory activity, aggressive course and early development of physical and cognitive disability. A highly effective early treatment must be considered in POMS. OBJECTIVE To evaluate safety and efficacy of natalizumab (NTZ) in naïve POMS. METHODS 20 naïve POMS (13F, 7 M; mean age: 13.8 ± 2.7 years) were treated with NTZ for at least 24 months (mean number of infusions: 42 ± 20). No evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3 plus status, i.e., no relapse, no disease progression (EDSS score), no radiological activity and no cognitive decline, was evaluated. RESULTS After 2 years of NTZ treatment, a significant reduction in the mean EDSS score (p < 0.0001) was observed in the whole cohort. During the follow-up, evidence of disease activity on MRI was observed in two patients (10%) and a mild decline in cognition was observed in other two. No patient had clinical relapse. At the time of last visit NEDA-3 plus status was maintained in 16 (80%) patients. No major adverse event was observed. CONCLUSION Early treatment of aggressive POMS with NTZ proved to be highly effective in achieving and maintaining the NEDA-3 plus status. Our data support the use of NTZ as first treatment choice in POMS.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With the recognition that pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by more prominent disease activity, earlier age at onset of disability milestones, and more prominent cognitive impairment compared with physical disability earlier in the disease course compared with adult-onset multiple sclerosis (AOMS), there has been increasing interest in identifying optimal and safe treatment approaches to achieve better disease control in this group. Injectable therapies have been traditionally used as first line in this population, although not formally approved. This review focuses on current treatment and monitoring approaches in POMS. RECENT FINDINGS In the past few years, and despite the paucity of FDA-approved medications for use in POMS, an increasing trend toward using newer disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in this group is observed. However, escalation (as opposed to induction) remains the most frequent approach, and many children continue to be untreated before age 18, particularly before age 12. The only FDA- and EMA-approved disease-modifying therapy in POMS is fingolimod; however, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and alemtuzumab either have been evaluated in observational studies or are being currently investigated in formal randomized controlled trials for use in POMS and appear to be safe in this group. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has also been evaluated in a small series. Clinical outcome measures and MS biomarkers have been poorly studied in POMS; however, the use of composite functional scores, neurofilament light chain, optical coherence tomography, and imaging findings is being increasingly investigated to improve early diagnosis and efficient monitoring of POMS. Off-label use of newer DMTs in POMS is increasing, and based on retrospective data, and phase 2 trials, this approach appears to be safe in children. Results from ongoing trials will help clarify the safety and efficacy of these therapies in the future. Fingolimod is the only FDA-approved medication for use in POMS. Outcome measures and biomarkers used in AOMS are being studied in POMS and are greatly needed to quantify treatment response in this group.
Collapse
|
20
|
Krupp LB, Vieira MC, Toledano H, Peneva D, Druyts E, Wu P, Boulos FC. A Review of Available Treatments, Clinical Evidence, and Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis in the United States. J Child Neurol 2019; 34:612-620. [PMID: 31234708 DOI: 10.1177/0883073819855592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric multiple sclerosis is associated with challenges in prompt diagnosis and uncertainty regarding optimal treatment. This review aimed to identify treatment guidelines or consensus statements for pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment options for pediatric multiple sclerosis, and any randomized controlled trials and observational studies examining available pharmacologic treatments in the pediatric multiple sclerosis population. Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE (1946-2016), EMBASE (1974-2016), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify treatment guidelines or consensus statements, pediatric multiple sclerosis treatment approvals, and randomized controlled trials and observation studies that examine the safety and effectiveness of available disease-modifying therapies. Only 3 consensus statements provided recommendations for pharmacologic treatments for children, all 3 published before the most recent revisions of the pediatric multiple sclerosis diagnostic guidelines. Despite the changes to the clinical landscape of pediatric multiple sclerosis with the introduction of diagnostic guidelines, fingolimod is the only FDA-approved treatment for pediatric multiple sclerosis in the United States. The effectiveness and safety of other disease-modifying therapies suggested by consensus statements have been reported in relatively small prospective and retrospective observational studies. Clinical evidence from a recently completed randomized controlled trial and future global registries can inform treatment decisions for the pediatric multiple sclerosis population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Haley Toledano
- 2 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Desi Peneva
- 3 Precision Health Economics, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Ping Wu
- 4 Precision Xtract, Vancouver, BC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ghezzi A, Comi G, Grimaldi LM, Moiola L, Pozzilli C, Fantaccini S, Gallo P. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of natalizumab in pediatric patients with RRMS. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2019; 6:e591. [PMID: 31355324 PMCID: PMC6624146 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000000591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective This phase I study investigated pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of natalizumab in pediatric patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Methods Pediatric patients with RRMS who were prescribed natalizumab 300 mg IV every 4 weeks were enrolled. Blood samples were collected on days 1, 2, 8, 15, and 22 and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 to estimate PK parameters; PD properties were evaluated by measuring α4-integrin saturation and lymphocyte counts over time. Natalizumab's safety profile was also evaluated. Results PK parameters were similar to those reported in adult patients; natalizumab concentrations peaked approximately 1 day after infusion in most of the participants (Cmax 142.9 μg/mL, AUClast 47389.4 hr*μg/mL), followed by a biphasic decline with a rapid distribution phase and a slow elimination phase, with a terminal half-life of 215.1 hours. In terms of PD, both time course and magnitude of α4-integrin saturation and increase in lymphocyte counts were similar to those observed in adults. During the 16-week study follow-up, 3 adverse events attributed to natalizumab were observed; no unexpected safety events occurred. Conclusions PK profile, α4-integrin saturation, lymphocyte counts, and safety observed in these pediatric patients are comparable to those reported in adults. Classification of evidence This study provides Class I evidence that natalizumab PK/PD parameters and safety profile are similar in adults and pediatric patients in the short term. Longer studies, also including a larger number of younger subjects (aged 10-12 years), are required to further inform about long-term PK and PD parameters in pediatric patients with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Ghezzi
- Multiple Sclerosis Study Center (A.G.), ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate Hospital (VA); Department of Neurology (G.C., L.M.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan; Department of Neurology (L.M.G.), Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù; Department of Neurology (C.P.), "La Sapienza" University, Rome; Biogen Italia (S.F.), Milan; and Department of Neuroscience DNS, Multiple Sclerosis Centre (P.G.), Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Multiple Sclerosis Study Center (A.G.), ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate Hospital (VA); Department of Neurology (G.C., L.M.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan; Department of Neurology (L.M.G.), Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù; Department of Neurology (C.P.), "La Sapienza" University, Rome; Biogen Italia (S.F.), Milan; and Department of Neuroscience DNS, Multiple Sclerosis Centre (P.G.), Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Luigi Maria Grimaldi
- Multiple Sclerosis Study Center (A.G.), ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate Hospital (VA); Department of Neurology (G.C., L.M.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan; Department of Neurology (L.M.G.), Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù; Department of Neurology (C.P.), "La Sapienza" University, Rome; Biogen Italia (S.F.), Milan; and Department of Neuroscience DNS, Multiple Sclerosis Centre (P.G.), Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Lucia Moiola
- Multiple Sclerosis Study Center (A.G.), ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate Hospital (VA); Department of Neurology (G.C., L.M.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan; Department of Neurology (L.M.G.), Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù; Department of Neurology (C.P.), "La Sapienza" University, Rome; Biogen Italia (S.F.), Milan; and Department of Neuroscience DNS, Multiple Sclerosis Centre (P.G.), Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Carlo Pozzilli
- Multiple Sclerosis Study Center (A.G.), ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate Hospital (VA); Department of Neurology (G.C., L.M.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan; Department of Neurology (L.M.G.), Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù; Department of Neurology (C.P.), "La Sapienza" University, Rome; Biogen Italia (S.F.), Milan; and Department of Neuroscience DNS, Multiple Sclerosis Centre (P.G.), Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Simone Fantaccini
- Multiple Sclerosis Study Center (A.G.), ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate Hospital (VA); Department of Neurology (G.C., L.M.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan; Department of Neurology (L.M.G.), Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù; Department of Neurology (C.P.), "La Sapienza" University, Rome; Biogen Italia (S.F.), Milan; and Department of Neuroscience DNS, Multiple Sclerosis Centre (P.G.), Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Gallo
- Multiple Sclerosis Study Center (A.G.), ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate Hospital (VA); Department of Neurology (G.C., L.M.), Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan; Department of Neurology (L.M.G.), Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù; Department of Neurology (C.P.), "La Sapienza" University, Rome; Biogen Italia (S.F.), Milan; and Department of Neuroscience DNS, Multiple Sclerosis Centre (P.G.), Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kopp TI, Blinkenberg M, Chalmer TA, Petersen T, Ravnborg MH, Soelberg Sørensen P, Magyari M. Predictors of treatment outcome in patients with paediatric onset multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2019; 26:964-975. [PMID: 31081451 DOI: 10.1177/1352458519846100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease-modifying therapies (DMT) are increasingly used for children with multiple sclerosis (MS) even though most double-blinded randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy, safety and dosing strategy of a specific drug have included adults. OBJECTIVE To investigate predictors of treatment outcomes in patients with paediatric onset MS treated with DMTs. METHODS Prospective cohort study from the nationwide Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry including all patients with a MS diagnosis who initiated treatment with an approved DMT before the age of 18 (N = 137) and followed until their 25th birthday. Selected baseline predictors were tested in univariate and multivariate regression models. RESULTS Multivariate analyses showed that being female and having disease duration for 2 or more years prior to DMT initiation predicted a higher relapse rate. In addition, disease duration and baseline expanded disability status scale (EDSS) predicted both confirmed disability worsening and improvement. We found no difference in treatment outcome between children with MS onset before and after the age of 13 years. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of DMT in paediatric onset MS patients is comparable to that seen in adult onset MS patients. Earlier treatment start is associated with a beneficial prognosis in the paediatric cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tine Iskov Kopp
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark/Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Blinkenberg
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thor Ameri Chalmer
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark/Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thor Petersen
- Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Per Soelberg Sørensen
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark/Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melinda Magyari
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark/Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Waubant E, Banwell B, Wassmer E, Sormani MP, Amato MP, Hintzen R, Krupp L, Rostásy K, Tenembaum S, Chitnis T. Clinical trials of disease-modifying agents in pediatric MS: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations from the IPMSSG. Neurology 2019; 92:e2538-e2549. [PMID: 31043474 PMCID: PMC6556085 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The impetus for this consensus discussion was to recommend clinical trial designs that can deliver high-quality data for effective therapies for pediatric patients, in a reasonable timeframe, with a key focus on short- and long-term safety. Methods The International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group convened a meeting of experts to review the advances in the understanding of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (MS) and the advent of clinical trials for this population. Results In the last few years, convincing evidence has emerged that the biological processes involved in MS are largely shared across the age span. As such, treatments proven efficacious for the care of adults with MS have a biological rationale for use in pediatric MS given the relapsing-remitting course at onset and high relapse frequency. There are also ethical considerations on conducting clinical trials in this age group including the use of placebo owing to highly active disease. It is imperative to reconsider study design and implementation based on what information is needed. Are studies needed for efficacy or should safety be the primary goal? Further, there have been major recruitment challenges in recently completed and ongoing pediatric MS trials. Phase 3 trials for every newly approved therapy for adult MS in the pediatric MS population are simply not feasible. Conclusions A primary goal is to ensure high-quality evidence-based treatment for children and adolescents with MS, which will improve our understanding of the safety of these agents and remove regulatory or insurance-based limitations in access to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Waubant
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
| | - Brenda Banwell
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Evangeline Wassmer
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Maria-Pia Sormani
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Maria-Pia Amato
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Rogier Hintzen
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Lauren Krupp
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Kevin Rostásy
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Silvia Tenembaum
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Tanuja Chitnis
- From the UCSF MS Center (E.W.), San Francisco, CA; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (B.B.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Birmingham Children's Hospital (E.W.), UK; Department of Health Sciences (M.-P. S.), University of Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS; Department NEUROFARBA (M.-P.A.), University of Florence, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (M.-P.A.), Florence, Italy; Department of Neurology (R.H.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; MS Comprehensive Care Center at NYU Langone (L.K.), New York, NY; Division of Paediatric Neurology (K.R.), Children's Hospital Datteln, University Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany; Pediatric MS Center (S.T.), Department of Neurology, National Pediatric Hospital Dr. Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Partners Pediatric MS Center (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Krysko KM, Graves J, Rensel M, Weinstock-Guttman B, Aaen G, Benson L, Chitnis T, Gorman M, Goyal M, Krupp L, Lotze T, Mar S, Rodriguez M, Rose J, Waltz M, Charles Casper T, Waubant E. Use of newer disease-modifying therapies in pediatric multiple sclerosis in the US. Neurology 2018; 91:e1778-e1787. [PMID: 30333163 PMCID: PMC6251604 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the use and safety of newer disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in children with multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) treated under 18 years of age. METHODS This is a cohort study including children with MS or CIS followed at 12 outpatient practices participating in the US Network of Pediatric MS Centers. DMT use, including duration, dose, and side effects, was analyzed. Newer DMTs were defined as agents receiving Food and Drug Administration approval or with increased use in adult MS after 2005. RESULTS As of July 2017, 1,019 pediatric patients with MS (n = 748) or CIS (n = 271) were enrolled (65% female, mean onset 13.0 ± 3.9 years, mean follow-up 3.5 ± 3.1 years, median 1.6 visits per year). Of these, 78% (n = 587) with MS and 11% (n = 31) with CIS received DMT before 18 years of age. This consisted of at least one newer DMT in 42%, including dimethyl fumarate (n = 102), natalizumab (n = 101), rituximab (n = 57), fingolimod (n = 37), daclizumab (n = 5), and teriflunomide (n = 3). Among 17%, the initial DMT prescribed was a newer agent (36 dimethyl fumarate, 30 natalizumab, 22 rituximab, 14 fingolimod, 2 teriflunomide). Over the last 10 years, the use of newer agents has increased, particularly in those ≥12 years and to lesser extent in those <12 years. The short-term side effect profiles of newer DMTs did not differ from those reported in adults. CONCLUSION Newer DMTs are often used in pediatric MS, and have similar short-term safety, tolerability, and side effect profiles as in adults. These findings may help inform pediatric MS management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen M Krysko
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
| | - Jennifer Graves
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Mary Rensel
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Gregory Aaen
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Leslie Benson
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Tanuja Chitnis
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Mark Gorman
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Manu Goyal
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Lauren Krupp
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Timothy Lotze
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Soe Mar
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Moses Rodriguez
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - John Rose
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Michael Waltz
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - T Charles Casper
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Emmanuelle Waubant
- From the Department of Neurology (K.M.K., J.G., E.W.), University of California San Francisco; Department of Neurology (M. Rensel), Cleveland Clinic, OH; Department of Neurology (B.W.-G.), State University of New York at Buffalo; Department of Pediatrics (G.A.), Loma Linda University, CA; Department of Neurology (L.B., M. Gorman), Boston Children's Hospital, MA; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Neurology (M. Goyal, S.M.), Washington University in Saint Louis, MO; Department of Neurology (L.K.), New York University Langone Medical Center, NY; Department of Neurology (T.L.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Department of Neurology (M. Rodriguez), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology (J.R.), Biostatistician II (M.W.), and Department of Pediatrics (T.C.C.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) prevalence and incidence rates are increasing globally. No disease-modifying therapy are approved for MS pediatric population. Hence, we aim to review the literature on POMS to guide treating physicians on the current understanding of diagnosis and management of pediatric MS. METHODS The authors performed a literature search and reviewed the current understanding on risk factors and disease parameters in order to discuss the challenges in assessing and implementing diagnosis and therapy in clinical practice. RESULTS The revised International Pediatric MS group diagnostic criteria improved the accuracy of diagnosis. Identification of red flags and mimickers (e.g. acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and neuromyelitis optica) are vital before establishing a definitive diagnosis. Possible etiology and mechanisms including both environmental and genetic risk factors are highlighted. Pediatric MS patients tend to have active inflammatory disease course with a tendency to have brainstem / cerebellar presentations at onset. Due to efficient repair mechanisms at early life, pediatric MS patients tend to have longer time to reach EDSS 6 but reach it at earlier age. Although no therapeutic randomized clinical trials were conducted in pediatric cohorts, open-label multi-center studies reported efficacy and safety results with beta interferons, glatiramer acetate and natalizumab in similar adult cohorts. Several randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of oral disease-modifying therapies are ongoing in pediatric MS patients. CONCLUSION Pediatric MS has been increasingly recognized to have a more inflammatory course with frequent infratentorial presentations at onset, which would have important implications in the future management of pediatric cohorts while awaiting the results of ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raed Alroughani
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Amiri Hospital, Arabian Gulf Street, 13041, Sharq, Kuwait.
| | - Alexey Boyko
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetic of the Pirogov's Russian National Research Medical University and MS Clinic at the Usupov's Hospital, Ostrovitianov str. 1, Moscow, 117997, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cappa R, Theroux L, Brenton JN. Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Genes, Environment, and a Comprehensive Therapeutic Approach. Pediatr Neurol 2017; 75:17-28. [PMID: 28843454 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Revised: 06/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric multiple sclerosis is an increasingly recognized and studied disorder that accounts for 3% to 10% of all patients with multiple sclerosis. The risk for pediatric multiple sclerosis is thought to reflect a complex interplay between environmental and genetic risk factors. MAIN FINDINGS Environmental exposures, including sunlight (ultraviolet radiation, vitamin D levels), infections (Epstein-Barr virus), passive smoking, and obesity, have been identified as potential risk factors in youth. Genetic predisposition contributes to the risk of multiple sclerosis, and the major histocompatibility complex on chromosome 6 makes the single largest contribution to susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. With the use of large-scale genome-wide association studies, other non-major histocompatibility complex alleles have been identified as independent risk factors for the disease. The bridge between environment and genes likely lies in the study of epigenetic processes, which are environmentally-influenced mechanisms through which gene expression may be modified. CONCLUSIONS This article will review these topics to provide a framework for discussion of a comprehensive approach to counseling and ultimately treating the pediatric patient with multiple sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Cappa
- Department of Neurology, Division of Pediatric Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Liana Theroux
- Department of Neurology, Division of Pediatric Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - J Nicholas Brenton
- Department of Neurology, Division of Pediatric Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
McGinley M, Rossman IT. Bringing the HEET: The Argument for High-Efficacy Early Treatment for Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics 2017; 14:985-998. [PMID: 28895071 PMCID: PMC5722772 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-017-0568-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is rarer than adult-onset disease, and represents a different diagnostic and treatment challenge to clinicians. We review POMS clinical and radiographic presentations, and explore important differences between POMS and adult-onset MS natural histories and long-term outcomes. Despite having more active disease, current treatment guidelines for patients with POMS endorse the off-label use of lower-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) as first line. We review the available MS DMTs, their evidence for use in POMS, and the contrasting treatment strategies of high-efficacy early treatment and escalation therapy. We introduce a new treatment approach, the "high-efficacy early treatment", or HEET strategy, based on using directly observed, high-efficacy intravenously infused DMTs as first-line therapies. Like other proposed POMS treatment strategies, HEET will need to be prospectively studied, and all treatment decisions should be determined by an experienced neurologist, the patient, and his/her parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisa McGinley
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue U10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Ian T Rossman
- NeuroDevelopmental Science Center, Akron Children's Hospital, One Perkins Square, Akron, OH, 44308, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
The Use of Natalizumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Study. Pediatr Neurol 2017; 70:56-60. [PMID: 28389054 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) has been increasingly recognized. In the absence of approved disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for pediatric patients, clinicians resort to data extrapolated from clinical trials conducted in adults with MS. The objective of this article was to study the effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in with pediatric MS. METHODS Patients with pediatric MS (aged less than 18 years) who had been treated with natalizumab were followed up prospectively as part of the national MS registry. Data of relapsing patients who had at least a one-year follow-up were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the annual relapse rate after natalizumab treatment. Secondary outcomes measures included the mean change in disease progression measured by the expanded disability status scale and the proportion of patients with radiologic activity (gadolinium-enhancing or new T2 lesions) at the last follow-up visit. RESULTS Thirty-two patients with pediatric MS had been treated with natalizumab for at least 12 months, of whom 72% were females. The mean age at onset and disease duration were 14.9 ± 2.6 and 5.1 ± 3.1 years, respectively. Most patients (n = 21, 66%) had breakthrough disease on first-line disease-modifying therapies. The mean number of natalizumab infusions was 34.5 ± 18. The annual relapse rate was significantly reduced (1.66 ± 0.5 vs 0.06 ± 0.25; P < 0.001), whereas the mean expanded disability status score improved (3.3 ± 1.3 vs 2.2 ± 1.0; P < 0.001) at the last follow-up visits. The proportion of patients with magnetic resonance imaging activity was significantly reduced (93.8% versus 12.5%; P < 0.001). No major adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION In our pediatric MS cohort with aggressive or breakthrough disease, treatment with natalizumab was effective in reducing clinical and radiologic disease activity. Natalizumab has a similar clinical efficacy and safety profile as in adult MS.
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
31
|
Brenton JN, Banwell BL. Therapeutic Approach to the Management of Pediatric Demyelinating Disease: Multiple Sclerosis and Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis. Neurotherapeutics 2016; 13:84-95. [PMID: 26496907 PMCID: PMC4720662 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-015-0396-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Acquired pediatric demyelinating diseases manifest acutely with optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, or with various other acute deficits in focal or polyfocal areas of the central nervous system. Patients may experience a monophasic illness (as in the case of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) or one that may manifest as a chronic, relapsing disease [e.g., multiple sclerosis (MS)]. The diagnosis of pediatric MS and other demyelinating disorders of childhood has been facilitated by consensus statements regarding diagnostic definitions. Treatment of pediatric MS has been modeled after data obtained from clinical trials in adult-onset MS. There are now an increasing number of new therapeutic agents for MS, and many will be formally studied for use in pediatric patients. There are important efficacy and safety concerns regarding the use of these therapies in children and young adults. This review will discuss acute management as well as chronic immunotherapies in acquired pediatric demyelination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Nicholas Brenton
- grid.27755.32000000009136933XDepartment of Neurology, Division of Pediatric Neurology, University of Virginia, PO Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Brenda L. Banwell
- grid.239552.a0000000106808770Division of Neurology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Boulevard, Colket Translational Research Building, 10th floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vitaliti G, Matin N, Tabatabaie O, Di Traglia M, Pavone P, Lubrano R, Falsaperla R. Natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: discontinuation, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and possible use in children. Expert Rev Neurother 2015; 15:1321-41. [PMID: 26513633 DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1102061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
In the early 1990s, attention was drawn to the migration of immune cells into the central nervous system via the blood-brain barrier. The literature showed that lymphocytes binding to the endothelium were successfully inhibited by an antibody against α4β1 integrin. These biological findings resulted in the development of a humanized antibody to α4 integrin - natalizumab (NTZ) - to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of natalizumab, trying to answer the question whether its use may be recommended both in adult and in pediatric age groups as standard MS treatment. Our results highlight the improvement of clinical and radiological findings in treated patients (p < 0.005), confirming NTZ efficacy. Nevertheless, if NTZ is shown to be efficient, further studies should be performed to evaluate its safety and to target the MS profile that could benefit from this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Vitaliti
- a General Paediatrics Operative Unit , Policlinico-Vittorio-Emanuele University Hospital, University of Catania , Catania , Italy
| | - Nassim Matin
- b Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran
| | | | - Mario Di Traglia
- c Department of Statistics , La Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy
| | - Piero Pavone
- a General Paediatrics Operative Unit , Policlinico-Vittorio-Emanuele University Hospital, University of Catania , Catania , Italy
| | - Riccardo Lubrano
- d Paediatric Department, Paediatric Nephrology Operative Unit , Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy
| | - Raffaele Falsaperla
- a General Paediatrics Operative Unit , Policlinico-Vittorio-Emanuele University Hospital, University of Catania , Catania , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ghezzi A, Moiola L, Pozzilli C, Brescia-Morra V, Gallo P, Grimaldi LME, Filippi M, G GC. Natalizumab in the pediatric MS population: results of the Italian registry. BMC Neurol 2015; 15:174. [PMID: 26407848 PMCID: PMC4583752 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-015-0433-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Natalizumab is a promising option for pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with active evolution and a poor response to Interferon-beta or Glatiramer Acetate. However, no data are available in large cohorts of patients and after a long-term follow up. Our study was planned to shed lights on this topic. Methods A registry was established in 2007 in Italy to collect MS cases treated with Natalizumab (NA) before 18 years of age. Results 101 patients were included (69 females), mean age of MS onset 12.9 ± 2.7 years, mean age at NA initiation 14.7 ± 2.4 years. Mean treatment duration was 34.2 ± 18.3 months. During NA treatment, a total of 15 relapses were recorded in 9 patients, annualized relapse rate was 2.3 ± 1.0 in the year prior to NA and decreased to 0.1 ± 0.3 (p < 0.001) at last NA infusion. Mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) decreased from 2.6 ± 1.3 at initiation of NA to 1.8 ± 1.2 at the time of last visit (p < 0.001). At brain MRI, new T2 or Gd enhancing lesions were observed in 10/91 patients after 6 months, 6/87 after 12 months, 2/61 after 18 months, 2/68 after 24 months, 3/62 after 30 months, and 5/43 at longer follow up. At the time of last observation, 58 % of patients were free from clinical (relapses/increased EDSS) and/or MRI activity (new T2 or gadolinium-enhancing lesions). No relevant adverse events were recorded. Discussion NA was safe, well tolerated and very efficacious in the large majority of patients. Our data support the use of this medication in subjects with pediatric MS and an aggressive course. Conclusions A relevant reduction of relapse rate and EDSS was observed during NA treatment, compared to pre-treatment period. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) occurred in 58 % of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Ghezzi
- Multiple Sclerosis Study Center, Hospital of Gallarate, Via Pastori 4, 21013, Gallarate, Italy.
| | - Lucia Moiola
- Department of Neurology, Hospital S. Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Carlo Pozzilli
- S. Andrea Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo Brescia-Morra
- MS Centre, Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences Department, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - Paolo Gallo
- Department of Neurology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | | | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Waldman A, Ghezzi A, Bar-Or A, Mikaeloff Y, Tardieu M, Banwell B. Multiple sclerosis in children: an update on clinical diagnosis, therapeutic strategies, and research. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13:936-48. [PMID: 25142460 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70093-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
The clinical features, diagnostic challenges, neuroimaging appearance, therapeutic options, and pathobiological research progress in childhood-and adolescent-onset multiple sclerosis have been informed by many new insights in the past 7 years. National programmes in several countries, collaborative research efforts, and an established international paediatric multiple sclerosis study group have contributed to revised clinical diagnostic definitions, identified clinical features of multiple sclerosis that differ by age of onset, and made recommendations regarding the treatment of paediatric multiple sclerosis. The relative risks conveyed by genetic and environmental factors to paediatric multiple sclerosis have been the subject of several large cohort studies. MRI features have been characterised in terms of qualitative descriptions of lesion distribution and applicability of MRI aspects to multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria, and quantitative studies have assessed total lesion burden and the effect of the disease on global and regional brain volume. Humoral-based and cell-based assays have identified antibodies against myelin, potassium-channel proteins, and T-cell profiles that support an adult-like T-cell repertoire and cellular reactivity against myelin in paediatric patients with multiple sclerosis. Finally, the safety and efficacy of standard first-line therapies in paediatric multiple sclerosis populations are now appreciated in more detail, and consensus views on the future conduct and feasibility of phase 3 trials for new drugs have been proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Waldman
- Division of Neurology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Angelo Ghezzi
- Ospedale di Gallarate, Centro Studi Sclerosi Multipla, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Amit Bar-Or
- Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Yann Mikaeloff
- Unité de Rééducation Neurologique Infantile, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marc Tardieu
- Service de Neurologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Brenda Banwell
- Division of Neurology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Salmen A, Gold R, Chan A. Management of disease-modifying treatments in neurological autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. Clin Exp Immunol 2014; 176:135-48. [PMID: 24358961 PMCID: PMC3992026 DOI: 10.1111/cei.12258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic armamentarium for autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system, specifically multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica, is steadily increasing, with a large spectrum of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive agents targeting different mechanisms of the immune system. However, increasingly efficacious treatment options also entail higher potential for severe adverse drug reactions. Especially in cases failing first-line treatment, thorough evaluation of the risk-benefit profile of treatment alternatives is necessary. This argues for the need of algorithms to identify patients more likely to benefit from a specific treatment. Moreover, paradigms to stratify the risk for severe adverse drug reactions need to be established. In addition to clinical/paraclinical measures, biomarkers may aid in individualized risk-benefit assessment. A recent example is the routine testing for anti-John Cunningham virus antibodies in natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients to assess the risk for the development of progressive multi-focal leucoencephalopathy. Refined algorithms for individualized risk assessment may also facilitate early initiation of induction treatment schemes in patient groups with high disease activity rather than classical escalation concepts. In this review, we will discuss approaches for individiualized risk-benefit assessment both for newly introduced agents as well as medications with established side-effect profiles. In addition to clinical parameters, we will also focus on biomarkers that may assist in patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Salmen
- Department of Neurology, St Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Alroughani RA, Aref HM, Bohlega SA, Dahdaleh MP, Feki I, Al Jumah MA, Al-Kawi MZ, Koussa SF, Sahraian MA, Alsharoqi IA, Yamout BI. Natalizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: Middle East and North Africa regional recommendations for patient selection and monitoring. BMC Neurol 2014; 14:27. [PMID: 24521176 PMCID: PMC3927624 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2013] [Accepted: 02/07/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Natalizumab, a highly specific α4-integrin antagonist, , has recently been registered across the Middle East and North Africa region. It improves clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes and reduces the rate of relapse and disability progression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Natalizumab is recommended for patients who fail first-line disease-modifying therapy or who have very active disease. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is a rare, serious adverse event associated with natalizumab. We aim to develop regional recommendations for the selection and monitoring of MS patients to be treated with natalizumab in order to guide local neurological societies. Methods After a review of available literature, a group of neurologists with expertise in the management of MS met to discuss the evidence and develop regional recommendations to guide appropriate use of natalizumab in the region. Results Disease breakthrough is defined as either clinical (relapse or disability progression) or radiological activity (new T2 lesion or gadolinium-enhancing lesions on MRI), or a combination of both. Natalizumab is recommended as an escalation therapy in patients with breakthrough disease based on its established efficacy in Phase III studies. Several factors including prior immunosuppressant therapy, anti-John Cunningham virus (JCV) antibody status and patient choice will affect the selection of natalizumab. In highly active MS, natalizumab is considered as a first-line therapy for naive patients with disabling relapses in association with MRI activity. The anti-JCV antibody test is used to assess anti-JCV antibody status and identify the risk of PML. While seronegative patients should continue treatment with natalizumab, anti-JCV antibody testing every 6 months and annual MRI scans are recommended as part of patient monitoring. In seropositive patients, the expected benefits of natalizumab treatment have to be weighed against the risks of PML. Clinical vigilance and follow-up MRI scans remain the cornerstone of monitoring. After 2 years of natalizumab therapy, monitoring should include more frequent MRI scans (every 3–4 months) for seropositive patients, and the risk-benefit ratio should be reassessed and discussed with patients. Conclusions Recommendations have been developed to guide neurologists in the Middle East and North Africa on patient selection for natalizumab treatment and monitoring.
Collapse
|
38
|
Lugaresi A, di Ioia M, Travaglini D, Pietrolongo E, Pucci E, Onofrj M. Risk-benefit considerations in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2013; 9:893-914. [PMID: 23836975 PMCID: PMC3699254 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s45144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and mainly affects young adults. Its natural history has changed in recent years with the advent of disease-modifying drugs, which have been available since the early 1990s. The increasing number of first-line and second-line treatment options, together with the variable course of the disease and patient lifestyles and expectations, makes the therapeutic decision a real challenge. The aim of this review is to give a comprehensive overview of the main present and some future drugs for relapsing-remitting MS, including risk-benefit considerations, to enable readers to draw their own conclusions regarding the risk-benefit assessment of personalized treatment strategies, taking into account not only treatment-related but also disease-related risks. We performed a Medline literature search to identify studies on the treatment of MS with risk stratification and risk-benefit considerations. We focused our attention on studies of disease-modifying, immunomodulating, and immunosuppressive drugs, including monoclonal antibodies. Here we offer personal considerations, stemming from long-term experience in the treatment of MS and thorough discussions with other neurologists closely involved in the care of patients with the disease. MS specialists need to know not only the specific risks and benefits of single drugs, but also about drug interactions, either in simultaneous or serial combination therapy, and patient comorbidities, preferences, and fears. This has to be put into perspective, considering also the risks of untreated disease in patients with different clinical and radiological characteristics. There is no single best treatment strategy, but therapy has to be tailored to the patient. This is a time-consuming task, rich in complexity, and influenced by the attitude towards risk on the parts of both the patient and the clinical team. The broader the MS drug market becomes, the harder it will be for the clinician to help the patient decide which therapeutic strategy to opt for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Lugaresi
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| | - Maria di Ioia
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| | - Daniela Travaglini
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| | - Erika Pietrolongo
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| | - Eugenio Pucci
- Operative Unit Neurologia ASUR Marche Area Vasta 3, Macerata, Italy
| | - Marco Onofrj
- Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University “G d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|