Etiology, clinical course and response to the treatment of status epilepticus in children: A 16-year single-center experience based on 602 episodes of status epilepticus

Identification of etiologies according to baseline clinical features of pediatric new-onset refractory status epilepticus in single center retrospective study

PURPOSE

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is defined as a state of prolonged seizure activity that does not improve despite the appropriate administration of medications, with underlying causes unknown after the initial diagnosis of status epilepticus. Because episodes of NORSE are accompanied by severe complications and a high risk of mortality, the prompt identification of the underlying cause is crucial for effective treatment and outcome prediction. This study assessed the relationship of NORSE etiologies with baseline clinical features in pediatric population.

METHODS

Seventy-one pediatric patients, under 18 years of age at the initial diagnosis (4.50 ± 4.04, mean ± standard deviation), who experienced at least one episode of NORSE and underwent a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation between January 2005 and June 2020 at our center, were retrospectively selected. We reviewed clinical features at disease onset and long-term follow-up data. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) was used to distinguish etiological clusters according to baseline clinical characteristics, and further analysis was performed based on underlying etiologies.

RESULTS

Two distinct etiological groups-genetic and non-genetic-were identified based on the UMAP of clinical characteristics. Dravet syndrome (12/15, 80%) was more predominant in patients with a genetic diagnosis, whereas cryptogenic NORSE and encephalitis were prevalent in patients without a genetic diagnosis. The analysis of etiological categories revealed that age at the onset of status epilepticus (P=0.021) and progression to super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) (P=0.038) were independently associated with differences in etiologies.

CONCLUSION

Several clinical features in patients with NORSE, including the age of onset and the development of SRSE, can help identify underlying causes, which necessitate prompt and adequate treatment.

Role of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Refractory and Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Pediatric Case Series

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus is a life-threatening condition that is defined as refractory (RSE) when the seizure activity continues despite treatment with benzodiazepine and a second appropriate treatment. Super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is an RSE that persists or recurs for ≥24 h. Few papers have reported the outcomes of pediatric patients affected by RSE and SRSE and treated with neuromodulation therapies. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. We present our findings of pediatric patients treated with VNS for RSE/SRSE.

METHODS

We present a case series of seven consecutive pediatric patients treated with VNS for SRSE since 2012 by a single surgeon in Monza and Padua. A rapid titration was started soon after implantation. We considered electroclinical data before and after VNS implantation and at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

We achieved the resolution of SRSE in five out of seven patients in a mean time of two weeks. At the last follow-up, these patients had a significant reduction of seizure burden without any relapse of SE.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on our limited findings, we discuss the potential role of VNS therapy in similar but distinct clinical contexts. For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and RSE/SRSE, prompt VNS consideration is suggested, offering rapid responses and potentially reducing pharmacological load. Meanwhile, in NORSE/FIRES, we suggest early neuromodulation during the acute phase if standard treatments prove ineffective or not tolerated. This approach may leverage VNS's potential anti-inflammatory effects and neuromodulation, enhancing patient-specific treatments. Expanding case studies and prolonged follow-ups are recommended to strengthen these clinical insights.

Management of Status Epilepticus by Different Pediatric Departments: Neurology, Intensive Care, and Emergency Medicine

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore the differences in status epilepticus (SE) management among pediatric neurology, emergency medicine, and intensive care specialists in Turkey.

METHODS

A 22-item questionnaire regarding first-, second-, and third-line management strategies of SE including demographic characteristics and common etiologies according to the specialty of participants was mailed to 370 specialists working in Turkey.

RESULTS

A total of 334 participants (response rate 90%) comprising 136 pediatric neurologists, 102 pediatric emergency medicine specialists, and 96 pediatric intensive care specialists completed the survey. While intensive care specialists frequently managed SE due to metabolic and autoimmune reasons, the most common etiologies encountered by emergency medicine specialists were epilepsy and infections. More than half of the intensive care specialists (64.6%) reported using non-BZD antiseizure medications in the 5th minute of the seizure. Most of the neurologists (76.4%) preferred to administer intravenous (IV) levetiracetam infusion as a second-line agent. About half of intensive care specialists and neurologists tried immunomodulatory therapies in super-refractory SE. Intensive care and emergency medicine specialists were less likely to favor ketogenic diet and pyridoxine therapy for the treatment of super-refractory SE. The rate of requesting EEG monitoring to recognize nonconvulsive SE (NCSE) was found to be very low except for neurologists.

CONCLUSION

There was no consensus among neurologists, intensive care specialists, and emergency medicine specialists in the management of SE in Turkey. Familiarity with particular antiseizure medications and the etiologies they manage seem to be the most important factors influencing the attitudes.

Clinical Features and Management of Status Epilepticus in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVES

Status epilepticus (SE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in children. SE in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are not well characterized. The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate the clinical features and treatment of seizures in children admitted to the PICU of our hospital.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the clinical characteristics of patients aged between 1 month and 18 years who were admitted to our hospital with SE or who were diagnosed with SE after hospitalization and were followed up with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring between January 2015 and December 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients with SE, 50 (56.8%) boys and 38 (43.2%) girls, were included. The median age was 24 months (interquartile range, 12-80 months). When we evaluate the continuous electroencephalographic monitoring data, 27 (30.7%) were lateralized, 20 (22.7%) were multifocal, 30 (34.1%) were generalized, and 11 (12.5%) were bilateral independent epileptic activity. Seventy nine patients (89.8%) were evaluated as convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) and 9 (10.2%) as nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM III) score and mortality of patients with NCSE were higher ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.046, respectively). Thirteen eight patients (43.1%) were diagnosed as SE, 38 patients (43.1%) as refractory SE, and 12 patients (13.6%) as super-refractory SE. The overall mortality rate was 10.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Status epilepticus is a neurological emergency that causes mortality and morbidity. Electroencephalographic monitoring is important for the recognition of seizures and rapid intervention. No superiority of second-line treatments or combined treatments was demonstrated in patients with SE.

Epileptic Status in a PEDiatric cohort (ESPED) requiring intensive care treatment: A multicenter, national, two-year prospective surveillance study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide seizure etiology, semiology, underlying conditions, and out-of- and in-hospital diagnostics, treatment, and outcome data on children with out-of- or in-hospital-onset status epilepticus (SE) according to the International League Against Epilepsy definition that required admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for ≥4 hours.

METHODS

This prospective national surveillance study on SE in childhood and adolescence was conducted over 2 years (07/2019-06/2021).

RESULTS

This study examined 481 SE episodes in 481 children with a median age of 43 months (1 month to 17 years 11 months), of which 46.2% were female and 50.7% had a previous seizure history. The most frequent acute SE cause was a prolonged, complicated febrile seizure (20.6%). The most common initial seizure types were generalized seizures (49.9%), focal seizures (18.0%), and unknown types (12.1%); 40.5% of patients suffered from refractory SE and 5.0% from super-refractory SE. The three most common medications administered by nonmedically trained individuals were diazepam, midazolam, and antipyretics. The three most frequent anti-seizure medications (ASMs) administered by the emergency physician were midazolam, diazepam, and propofol. The three most common ASMs used in the clinical setting were midazolam, levetiracetam, and phenobarbital. New ASMs administered included lacosamide, brivaracetam, perampanel, stiripentol, and eslicarbazepine. Status epilepticus terminated in 16.0% in the preclinical setting, 19.1% in the emergency department, and 58.0% in the PICU; the outcome was unknown for 6.9%. The median PICU stay length was 2 (1-121) days. The median modified Rankin scale was 1 (0-5) on admission and 2 (0-6) at discharge. New neurological deficits after SE were observed in 6.2%. The mortality rate was 3.5%.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study provides current real-world out-of- and in-hospital data on pediatric SE requiring PICU admission. New ASMs are more frequently used in this population. This knowledge may help generate a more standardized approach.

Intravenous ganaxolone in pediatric super-refractory status epilepticus: A single hospital experience

Synaptic GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR) internalization contributes to the drug resistant nature of super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). Ganaxolone is a 3β-methylated synthetic analog of the endogenous neuroactive steroid, allopregnanolone, that has positive allosteric modulatory activity on synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA_A receptors. Ganaxolone is currently in clinical trials to treat rare pediatric seizure disorders and established and refractory SE. Two pediatric patients with SRSE (age 17 and age 7) were treated under emergency investigational new drug (E-IND) applications with intravenous (IV) ganaxolone administered as an initial bolus and a maintenance infusion for up to 4.5 days with intermittent IV boluses as-needed followed by taper on day 5 and transitioned to chronic treatment using ganaxolone suspension. Adjunctive ganaxolone was effective in terminating SRSE in both patients, safely permitting IV anesthetics to be weaned. Seizure control has been maintained after transitioning to enteric ganaxolone. Further investigation of ganaxolone as a safe and effective treatment for SRSE is warranted.

Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE): A case series of 22 pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Super-refractory Status Epilepticus (SRSE) is a rare condition in which SE persists or recurs ≥24 h after the onset of anesthesia. Although its characteristics are well defined in adulthood, only few studies on children are available.

METHODS

we retrospectively analyzed the population of patients with SRSE aged <18 years treated in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of the Bambino Gesù Pediatric Hospital. We assessed clinical history, etiology, neuroimaging, electro-clinical features of SRSE, treatments and neurological status after SRSE cessation.

RESULTS

We identified 22 children with median age at SRSE onset of 3.1 years (IQR 1.3-7.3) and SRSE duration of 22.0 days (IQR 11.2-30.5) Before SRSE, 17 patients (77.3%) had an abnormal neurological examination, 18 (81.8%) had a diagnosis of epilepsy, 8 of which already presented an episode of SE. Only 4 patients (18.2%) had New Onset SRSE. Eleven patients had a progressive etiology (PE), 9 had a remote etiology (RE) and 2 patients had an acute etiology (AE). Amongst PE the most frequent etiologies were mitochondrial diseases, while among RE they were Developmental Epileptic Encephalopathies of genetic origin. Time to SRSE cessation was significantly longer in PE (p = 0.04). After SRSE, 8 patients, (7 with PE) showed a significant worsening of neurological status. In this group, mean time at SE cessation was significantly longer (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

pediatric SRSE is mostly associated with progressive diseases and remote etiologies. Underlying etiology seems to impact both on SRSE duration and subsequent neurological evolution, however more studies are needed to confirm these findings.

A retrospective study of 92 children with new-onset refractory status epilepticus

Little is known of the etiology, course, and treatment of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in children. Here we identified etiologies, electroencephalography (EEG) characteristics, and neuroimaging findings among pediatric patients with NORSE and among two patient subgroups, febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) group and non-FIRES group. We also examined treatments and risk factors related to poor prognosis. Ninety-two children with NORSE were identified in Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January 1, 2010 and September 1, 2020. The end date was chosen to guarantee at least a 6-month follow-up. Our results indicated that patients with FIRES account for 90% of pediatric patients with NORSE. The clinical, EEG, and neuroimaging results and prognosis were not significantly different between the FIRES group and non-FIRES group of individuals. 68.5% of our patients had unknown etiology, and viral etiology was the most common identified cause (26.1%). Electroencephalography might have a certain diagnostic value for NORSE. A gradual increase in seizure burden was obvious from the onset of disease, and continuous or recurrent ictal discharge lasting ≥ 30 min was quite common in our study. The mortality was 22.8% in our study. Among the 71 surviving patients, the outcome at discharge was poor but improved during follow-up, and 68.5% had good or fair outcomes at their last follow-up. A poor outcome was observed in 39 of 92 cases (42%), with 43.9% and 30% of individuals in the FIRES group and non-FIRES group, respectively, having a poor outcome. The presence of super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), electrographic seizures and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), and diffuse cortical edema and multifocal abnormality may be related to a poor prognosis. Our analysis did not indicate that prognosis was directly related to etiology or treatment. Management of NORSE is challenging, and the role of immunotherapy warrants further investigation.

Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the pediatric super-refractory status epilepticus population by describing treatment variability in super-refractory status epilepticus patients and comparing relevant clinical characteristics, including outcomes, between super-refractory status epilepticus, and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data between June 2011 and January 2019.

SETTING

Seventeen academic hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

We included patients 1 month to 21 years old presenting with convulsive refractory status epilepticus. We defined super-refractory status epilepticus as continuous or intermittent seizures lasting greater than or equal to 24 hours following initiation of continuous infusion and divided the cohort into super-refractory status epilepticus and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus groups.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified 281 patients (157 males) with a median age of 4.1 years (1.3-9.5 yr), including 31 super-refractory status epilepticus patients. Compared with nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus group, super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of first nonbenzodiazepine-antiseizure medication (149 min [55-491.5 min] vs 62 min [33.3-120.8 min]; p = 0.030) and of continuous infusion (495 min [177.5-1,255 min] vs 150 min [90-318.5 min]; p = 0.003); prolonged seizure duration (120 hr [58-368 hr] vs 3 hr [1.4-5.9 hr]; p < 0.001) and length of ICU stay (17 d [9.5-40 d] vs [1.8-8.8 d]; p < 0.001); more medical complications (18/31 [58.1%] vs 55/250 [22.2%] patients; p < 0.001); lower return to baseline function (7/31 [22.6%] vs 182/250 [73.4%] patients; p < 0.001); and higher mortality (4/31 [12.9%] vs 5/250 [2%]; p = 0.010). Within the super-refractory status epilepticus group, status epilepticus resolution was attained with a single continuous infusion in 15 of 31 patients (48.4%), two in 10 of 31 (32.3%), and three or more in six of 31 (19.4%). Most super-refractory status epilepticus patients (30/31, 96.8%) received midazolam as first choice. About 17 of 31 patients (54.8%) received additional treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of nonbenzodiazepine antiseizure medication treatment, higher number of medical complications and mortality, and lower return to neurologic baseline than nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients, although these associations were not adjusted for potential confounders. Treatment approaches following the first continuous infusion were heterogeneous, reflecting limited information to guide clinical decision-making in super-refractory status epilepticus.

Benzodiazepine administration patterns before escalation to second-line medications in pediatric refractory convulsive status epilepticus

Objective

This study was undertaken to evaluate benzodiazepine (BZD) administration patterns before transitioning to non‐BZD antiseizure medication (ASM) in pediatric patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE).

Methods

This retrospective multicenter study in the United States and Canada used prospectively collected observational data from children admitted with rSE between 2011 and 2020. Outcome variables were the number of BZDs given before the first non‐BZD ASM, and the number of BZDs administered after 30 and 45 min from seizure onset and before escalating to non‐BZD ASM.

Results

We included 293 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 3.8 (1.3–9.3) years. Thirty‐six percent received more than two BZDs before escalating, and the later the treatment initiation was after seizure onset, the less likely patients were to receive multiple BZD doses before transitioning (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .998, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .997–.999 per minute, p = .01). Patients received BZDs beyond 30 and 45 min in 57.3% and 44.0% of cases, respectively. Patients with out‐of‐hospital seizure onset were more likely to receive more doses of BZDs beyond 30 min (IRR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.73–3.46, p < .0001) and beyond 45 min (IRR = 3.75, 95% CI = 2.40–6.03, p < .0001) compared to patients with in‐hospital seizure onset. Intermittent SE was a risk factor for more BZDs administered beyond 45 min compared to continuous SE (IRR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01–2.06, p = .04). Forty‐seven percent of patients (n = 94) with out‐of‐hospital onset did not receive treatment before hospital arrival. Among patients with out‐of‐hospital onset who received at least two BZDs before hospital arrival (n = 54), 48.1% received additional BZDs at hospital arrival.

Significance

Failure to escalate from BZDs to non‐BZD ASMs occurs mainly in out‐of‐hospital rSE onset. Delays in the implementation of medical guidelines may be reduced by initiating treatment before hospital arrival and facilitating a transition to non‐BZD ASMs after two BZD doses during handoffs between prehospital and in‐hospital settings.

Ketogenic Diet in the Treatment of Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus at a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Experience

Background: To evaluate the use of the ketogenic diet (KD) for treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) at a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Design: A retrospective analysis of all pediatric patients treated for SRSE with the KD at our center was performed using patient data from our prospective longitudinal KD database.

Setting: SRSE is defined as refractory SE that continues or recurs 24 h or more after initiation of anesthetic drugs. We describe the clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) findings of all children treated with KD at our PICU. The KD was administered as add-on after failure of standard treatment. Response was defined as EEG seizure resolution (absence of seizures and suppression–burst ratio ≥50%).

Patients: Eight consecutive SRSE patients (four females) treated with KD were included. Median age at onset of SRSE was 13.6 months (IQR 0.9–105), and median age at KD initiation was 13.7 months (IQR 1.9 months to 8.9 years). Etiology was known in 6/8 (75%): genetic in 4 (50%), structural in 1 (12.5%), and autoimmune/inflammatory in 1 (12.5%).

Main Results: Time from onset of SRSE to initiation of KD was median 6 days (IQR 1.3–9). Time until clinically relevant ketosis (beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) >2 mmol/L in serum) was median 68.0 h (IQR 27.3–220.5). Higher ketosis was achieved when a higher proportion of enteral feeds was possible. Four (50%) patients responded to KD treatment within 7 days. During follow-up (median 4.2 months, IQR 1.6–12.3), 5/8 patients—three of them responders—died within 3–12 months after SRSE.

Conclusions: In eight patients with SRSE due to severe etiologies including Alpers syndrome, we report an initial 50% response to KD. KD was used early in SRSE and sufficient levels of ketosis were reached early in most patients. Higher ketosis was achieved with combined enteral and parenteral feedings.

The improvement in diagnosis and epilepsy managing in children with progressive myoclonus epilepsy during the last decade - A tertiary center experience in cohort of 51 patients

The aim of the study was to explore whether diagnosis and managing children with progressive myoclonus epilepsy (PME) were improved during the last decade.

METHODS

The retrospective study included children with PME treated in the Institute during the last 25 years. Investigation time was divided in two periods (groups): before December 2010 (the first group) and after this period up to December 2019 (the second group). Inclusion criteria are as follows: patients aged from 0.2-18 years and with PME. Evaluated parameters are etiology, age at seizure onset, diagnosis delay, epilepsy phenotype, and, as a measure of epilepsy control - status epilepticus (SE) frequency and recurrence rate. Statistical analysis included the following tests: Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney, and analysis of variance (ANOVA), using SPSS version 25.

RESULTS

The study included 51 patients, 27 in the first, and 24 in the second group. The underlying diseases were: neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL; 30), Gaucher (5), Niemann-Pick (4), mitochondrial (4), Lafora (3), Krabbe (2), and KCNC1 gene mutation (2). The average duration from initial symptoms to diagnosis was 3.2 ± 3 years (first group) vs. 1.4 ± 0.9 years (second). Both SE frequency rate (55.5% vs. 37.5%) and recurrence rate (66.7% vs. 22.2%) were higher in the first group, showing tendency towards, but not statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis and epilepsy managing children with PME were improved during the last decade. Earlier genetic diagnosis, appropriate antiseizure medications, education of parents/caregivers of children in high risk for SE, and availability of effective prehospital rescue medications contributed to significantly decreased frequency and recurrence rate of SE.

Status Epilepticus in Children

For various reasons, status epilepticus in children is different than in adults. Pediatric specificities include status epilepticus epidemiology, underlying etiologies, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment options. Relevant data from the literature are presented for each of them, and questions remaining open for future studies on status epilepticus in childhood are listed.

Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee

Purpose:

Established tonic–clonic status epilepticus (SE) does not stop in one-third of patients when treated with an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine bolus followed by a loading dose of a second antiseizure medication (ASM). These patients have refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and a high risk of morbidity and death. For patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus (CRSE), we sought to determine the strength of evidence for 8 parenteral ASMs used as third-line treatment in stopping clinical CRSE.

Methods:

A structured literature search (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL) was performed to identify original studies on the treatment of CRSE in children and adults using IV brivaracetam, ketamine, lacosamide, levetiracetam (LEV), midazolam (MDZ), pentobarbital (PTB; and thiopental), propofol (PRO), and valproic acid (VPA). Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine were added to determine the effectiveness in treating hard-to-control seizures in special circumstances. Studies were evaluated by predefined criteria and were classified by strength of evidence in stopping clinical CRSE (either as the last ASM added or compared to another ASM) according to the 2017 American Academy of Neurology process.

Results:

No studies exist on the use of ACTH, corticosteroids, or IVIg for the treatment of CRSE. Small series and case reports exist on the use of these agents in the treatment of RSE of suspected immune etiology, severe epileptic encephalopathies, and rare epilepsy syndromes. For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of brivaracetam (level U; 4 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of ketamine (level U; 25 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, it is possible that lacosamide is effective at stopping RSE (level C; 2 class III, 14 class IV studies). For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that LEV and VPA are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support the effectiveness of LEV (level U; 2 class IV studies). Magnesium sulfate may be effective in the treatment of eclampsia, but there are only case reports of its use for CRSE. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ and diazepam infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that MDZ infusion and PTB are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ infusion and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that low-dose and high-dose MDZ infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that MDZ is effective as the last drug added (level U; 29 class IV studies). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults and children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB is effective as the last ASM added (level U; 42 class IV studies). For CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PRO is effective as the last ASM used (level U; 26 class IV studies). No pediatric-only studies exist on the use of PRO for CRSE, and many guidelines do not recommend its use in children aged <16 years. Pyridoxine-dependent and pyridoxine-responsive epilepsies should be considered in children presenting between birth and age 3 years with refractory seizures and no imaging lesion or other acquired cause of seizures. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that VPA and diazepam infusion are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). No class I to III studies have been reported in adults treated with VPA for CRSE. In comparison, for children and adults with established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), after an initial benzodiazepine, it is likely that loading doses of LEV 60 mg/kg, VPA 40 mg/kg, and fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg are equally effective at stopping SE (level B, 1 class I study).

Conclusions:

Mostly insufficient evidence exists on the efficacy of stopping clinical CRSE using brivaracetam, lacosamide, LEV, valproate, ketamine, MDZ, PTB, and PRO either as the last ASM or compared to others of these drugs. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, IVIg, corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine have been used in special situations but have not been studied for CRSE. For the treatment of established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), LEV, VPA, and fosphenytoin are likely equally effective, but whether this is also true for CRSE is unknown. Triple-masked, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of parenteral anesthetizing and nonanesthetizing ASMs in the treatment of CRSE.

Coordination of hippocampal theta and gamma oscillations relative to spatial active avoidance reflects cognitive outcome after febrile status epilepticus

Cognitive deficits may arise from a variety of genetic alterations and neurological insults that impair neural coding mechanisms and the routing of neural information underpinning learning and memory. Slow and medium gamma oscillations underpin memory recall and sensorimotor processing and represent dynamic inputs at CA1 synapses. Febrile status epilepticus (FSE) can lead to increased risk for temporal lobe epilepsy and enduring cognitive impairments. In a rodent model, we assessed how FSE alters hippocampal CA1 signals relative to spatial task performance and serve as a readout of synaptic input efficacy. The power of theta (5-12 Hz), slow gamma (30-50 Hz), and medium gamma (70-90 Hz) differentially interact with respect to cognitive demands during active avoidance behavior on a rotating arena. Successful avoidance was characterized by slow gamma that was largest several seconds before or after peak acceleration. Peak acceleration coincides with peak theta oscillations, followed within approximately 1 s by peak medium gamma. FSE animals showing impairment in the task maintained the profiles of theta and medium gamma associated with increased sensorimotor processing following peak acceleration but did not exhibit the same slow gamma profile associated with epochs of memory retrieval. While CA1 synapses from entorhinal cortex were functionally unaffected by FSE, communication via synapses from CA3 may have been impaired, leading to both temporal discoordination and poor memory retrieval. These findings demonstrate theta/gamma profiles can serve as both physiological biomarkers for memory retrieval or encoding deficits and synapse level treatment targets that could attenuate cognitive comorbidities associated with early life seizures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Thiamylal anaesthetic therapy for febrile refractory status epilepticus in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate barbiturate anaesthetic therapy using thiamylal for febrile refractory status epilepticus (fRSE) in children.

METHODS

This was a review of a prospectively-collected database between April 2012-March 2016 for fRSE cases treated with thiamylal anaesthetic therapy in a single paediatric hospital in Japan. The sample comprised 23 children (median age, 23 months) with fRSE that underwent thiamylal anaesthetic therapy for convulsive seizures lasting longer than 60 min, sustained after intravenous administration of benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants. The intervention comprised protocol-based thiamylal anaesthetic therapy with bolus administration. We measured the dose and time required to achieve the burst suppression pattern (BSP) on electroencephalography, seizure recurrence, death, neurological sequelae, and complications.

RESULTS

All patients except one reached the BSP. The thiamylal median dose until reaching the BSP was 27.5 mg/kg, and the median time from thiamylal administration to reaching the BSP was 109.5 min. There was one case of immediate treatment failure and one of withdrawal seizure, but no breakthrough seizure. No deaths occurred during treatment, and neurological sequelae occurred in four cases (17%). Vasopressors were administered in all cases. Other complications included 11 cases of pneumonia and one of enterocolitis.

CONCLUSION

We revealed the time and dose required to reach the BSP with thiamylal anaesthetic therapy using bolus administration in children. Our results suggested that reaching the BSP with bolus administration requires markedly less time than without bolus administration, rarely causes seizure recurrence in paediatric fRSE, and causes haemodynamic dysfunction and infections as often as observed without bolus administration.

Treatment options in pediatric super-refractory status epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is a seizure that continues >24 h after anesthesia, or recurs on the reduction of anesthesia. SRSE is extremely difficult-to-control and associated with poor outcome. To date, optimal therapy and outcome data in children is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess etiology, treatment options and outcome in pediatric SRSE patients.

METHOD

We reviewed medical records of children <15 years old with SRSE during 2007-2017 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Demographic data, etiology, treatment, complications and discharge outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients, aged 1 month-13 years were included. The leading etiology was immune-mediated encephalitis (29.4%) and epilepsy (29.4%). The most common anesthetic agents were midazolam (94.1%) and propofol (52.9%) with the average maximal dose of 1.3 and 6.9 mg/kg/h respectively. Other treatments included immunological therapy (76.5%), ketogenic diet (76.5%), pyridoxine/pyridoxal-5-phosphate (70.5%). The most common complications were hypotension (61.5%), drug hypersensitivity (32.5%). Median length of anesthetic and intensive care were 9 and 23 days. The mortality rate was 17.6%, and 2 of 3 febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome cases died. At discharge, all survivors were seizure free.

CONCLUSION

The majority of pediatric SRSE does not have epilepsy and the etiology is various. Treatment should expand from antiepileptic drugs to other modalities targeting different possible mechanisms such as immunomodulation or specific metabolic treatment. Multiple anesthetic drugs could be tolerated with close monitoring. Ketogenic diet, via enteral or parenteral route, could be considered early if requiring multiple anesthetic drugs. Initial outcome in children is relatively better than in adults.

New onset refractory status epilepticus research: What is on the horizon?

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a clinical presentation, not a specific diagnosis, in a patient without active epilepsy or other preexisting relevant neurologic disorder, with new onset of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) that does not resolve after 2 or more rescue medications, without a clear acute or active structural, toxic, or metabolic cause. Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome is a subset of NORSE in which fever began at least 24 hours prior to the RSE. Both terms apply to all age groups. Until recently, NORSE was a poorly recognized entity without a consistent definition or approach to care. We review the current state of knowledge in NORSE and propose a roadmap for future collaborative research. Research investigating NORSE should prioritize the following 4 domains: (1) clinical features, etiology, and pathophysiology; (2) treatment; (3) adult and pediatric evaluation and management approaches; and (4) public advocacy, professional education, and family support. We consider international collaboration and multicenter research crucial in achieving these goals.

Conventional and quantitative EEG in status epilepticus

PURPOSE

To summarize the use of continuous electroencephalographic monitoring (cEEG) in the diagnosis and management of pediatric convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) and subsequent non-convulsive seizures (NCS) with a focus on available guidelines and infrastructure. In addition, we provide an overview of quantitative EEG (QEEG) for the identification of NCS in critically ill children.

METHODS

We performed a review of the medical literature on the use of cEEG and QEEG in pediatric CSE. This included published guideline, consensus statements, and literature focused on the use of cEEG and QEEG to detect NCS.

RESULTS

cEEG monitoring is recommended for prompt recognition of ongoing seizures that may be subtle, masked by pharmacologic paralysis, and or converted from convulsive seizures to NCS after administration of anti-seizure medications. Evidence indicating that high seizure burden is associated with worse outcome has motivated prompt recognition and management of NCS. The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's consensus statement recommends a minimum of 24 h to exclude electrographic seizures, while the Neurocritical Care Society's guideline suggests 48 h in patients that are comatose. The use of QEEG amongst electroencephalographers and critical care medicine providers is increasing for NCS detection in critically ill children. The sensitivity and specificity of QEEG to detect NCS ranges from 65 to 83% and 65-92%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of cEEG is important to the diagnosis and treatment of NCS or subtle clinical seizures after pediatric CSE. QEEG allows cEEG data to be reviewed and interpreted quickly and is a useful tool for detection of NCS after CSE.

The etiology and prognosis of super-refractory convulsive status epilepticus in children

BACKGROUND

Both refractory convulsive status epilepticus (SE) and super-refractory SE are medical emergencies. However, there are limited data on super-refractory SE in children. Thus, this study focuses on characterizing the demographics, outcomes, and prognostic factors for super-refractory SE in children.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of super-refractory SE treated in a tertiary referral center in Taiwan. The functional outcome was evaluated by modified Rankin scale (mRS). Significant functional decline was defined as an mRS difference (before hospital admission and at discharge) of more than 2. The variates and the follow-up mRS values were then analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

We enrolled 134 patients with 191 episodes of convulsive SE and identified 30 patients with 38 episodes of convulsive super-refractory SE. The incidence of convulsive super-refractory SE in the group with SE was 19.9%, and the age ranged from 2.5 months to 17 years. In-hospital mortality was 13.3%, which was much lower than that of adult cohorts. Newly acquired epilepsy and cognitive deficit occurred in 100% and 88.5%, respectively. Newly acquired epilepsy, as a sequel of super-refractory SE, was observed in all 18 patients (100%) who survived and had no history of epilepsy. Significant functional decline (mRS difference of more than 2) at discharge occurred in 76.7%. Poor functional outcome was associated with acute symptomatic etiology (P < 0.001) and the number of anesthetic agents (P = 0.002). The functional outcome improved after 1 year of follow-up in our population.

CONCLUSIONS

Super-refractory SE is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in children. However, the in-hospital mortality rate is much lower compared with adults. The functional outcome in children is associated with acute symptomatic etiology and the number of anesthetic agents and may improve after long-term follow-up.

Successful use of pure cannabidiol for the treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus

We present the case of a child with long-standing, super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) who manifested prompt and complete resolution of SRSE upon exposure to pure cannabidiol. SRSE emerged in the context of remote suspected encephalitis with previously well-controlled epilepsy. We discuss the extent to which response may be specifically attributed to cannabidiol, with consideration and discussion of multiple potential drug–drug interactions. Based on this case, we propose that adjunctive cannabidiol be considered in the treatment of SRSE.

•

Adjunctive cannabidiol may be effective in the treatment of super refractory status epilepticus

Systematic review of clobazam use in patients with status epilepticus

Clobazam (CLB) is a commonly used oral antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been shown to be effective in various forms of epilepsy. Given its distinct 1,5‐benzodiazepine structure, rapid absorption, minimal drug interactions, and favorable safety profile, CLB displays unique properties when compared to other commonly used benzodiazepines. Recent evidence has shown that CLB may demonstrate therapeutic efficacy in status epilepticus (SE). The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the available evidence pertaining to the efficacy of CLB use in SE. An electronic literature search of Medline (1946 to November 6, 2017), Embase (1974 to November 6, 2017), and the Cochrane Library (1999 to November 6, 2017) databases was performed to identify reports of CLB use in SE. After screening and full text review, a total of 15 articles were included: 8 retrospective studies, 2 case series, and 5 case reports. Efficacy rates for CLB have varied among reports. Overall, based on the retrospective studies, a total of 76 patients with SE have been reported. CLB was introduced within 2–4 days from SE onset and has been reported to contribute to remission in 36 patients (47%). CLB maintenance dose ranged from 10 to 60 mg/day. However, the results need to be interpreted carefully because SE patients are a heterogeneous group with different etiologies and disease severities, and the response to CLB might vary in different patient population or seizure types. In conclusion, there is not sufficient evidence to determine the safety and efficacy of clobazam in the setting of SE. However, the current limited evidence combined with the unique characteristics of CLB suggest that the drug might be considered as an add‐on option in SE patients, with a suggested dosage range of 10–60 mg/day. Prospective studies are needed to fully establish the role of CLB in the management of SE.

Pediatric refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus

PURPOSE

To summarize the available evidence related to pediatric refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), with emphasis on epidemiology, etiologies, therapeutic approaches, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Narrative review of the medical literature using MEDLINE database.

RESULTS

RSE is defined as status epilepticus (SE) that fails to respond to adequately used first- and second-line antiepileptic drugs. SRSE occurs when SE persist for 24 h or more after administration of anesthesia, or recurs after its withdrawal. RSE and SRSE represent complex neurological emergencies associated with long-term neurological dysfunction and high mortality. Challenges in management arise as the underlying etiology is not always promptly recognized and therapeutic options become limited with prolonged seizures. Treatment decisions mainly rely on case series or experts' opinions. The comparative effectiveness of different treatment strategies has not been evaluated in large prospective series or randomized clinical trials. Continuous infusion of anesthetic agents is the most common treatment for RSE and SRSE, although many questions on optimal dosing and rate of administration remain unanswered. The use of non-pharmacological therapies is documented in case series or reports with low level of evidence. In addition to neurological complications resulting from prolonged seizures, children with RSE/SRSE often develop systemic complications associated with polypharmacy and prolonged hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

RSE and SRSE are neurological emergencies with limited therapeutic options. Multi-national collaborative efforts are desirable to evaluate the safety and efficacy of current RSE/SRSE therapies, and potentially impact patients' outcomes.

Refractory status epilepticus in children with and without prior epilepsy or status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

To compare refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE) management and outcome in children with and without a prior diagnosis of epilepsy and with and without a history of status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

This was a prospective observational descriptive study performed from June 2011 to May 2016 on pediatric patients (1 month-21 years of age) with rSE.

RESULTS

We enrolled 189 participants (53% male) with a median (25th-75th percentile) age of 4.2 (1.3-9.6) years. Eighty-nine (47%) patients had a prior diagnosis of epilepsy. Thirty-four (18%) patients had a history of SE. The time to the first benzodiazepine was similar in participants with and without a diagnosis of epilepsy (15 [5-60] vs 16.5 [5-42.75] minutes, p = 0.858). Patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy received their first non-benzodiazepine (BZD) antiepileptic drug (AED) later (93 [46-190] vs 50.5 [28-116] minutes, p = 0.002) and were less likely to receive at least one continuous infusion (35/89 [39.3%] vs 57/100 [57%], p = 0.03). Compared to patients with no history of SE, patients with a history of SE received their first BZD earlier (8 [3.5-22.3] vs 20 [5-60] minutes, p = 0.0073), although they had a similar time to first non-BZD AED (76.5 [45.3-124] vs 65 [32.5-156] minutes, p = 0.749). Differences were mostly driven by the patients with an out-of-hospital rSE onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study establishes that children with rSE do not receive more timely treatment if they have a prior diagnosis of epilepsy; however, a history of SE is associated with more timely administration of abortive medication.

Refractory Status Epilepticus in Children: Intention to Treat With Continuous Infusions of Midazolam and Pentobarbital

OBJECTIVE

To describe pediatric patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus in whom there is intention to use an IV anesthetic for seizure control.

DESIGN

Two-year prospective observational study evaluating patients (age range, 1 mo to 21 yr) with refractory status epilepticus not responding to two antiepileptic drug classes and treated with continuous infusion of anesthetic agent.

SETTING

Nine pediatric hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

In a cohort of 111 patients with refractory status epilepticus (median age, 3.7 yr; 50% male), 54 (49%) underwent continuous infusion of anesthetic treatment.

MAIN RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) ICU length of stay was 10 (3-20) days. Up to four "cycles" of serial anesthetic therapy were used, and seizure termination was achieved in 94% by the second cycle. Seizure duration in controlled patients was 5.9 (1.9-34) hours for the first cycle and longer when a second cycle was required (30 [4-120] hr; p = 0.048). Midazolam was the most frequent first-line anesthetic agent (78%); pentobarbital was the most frequently used second-line agent after midazolam failure (82%). An electroencephalographic endpoint was used in over half of the patients; higher midazolam dosing was used with a burst suppression endpoint. In midazolam nonresponders, transition to a second agent occurred after a median of 1 day. Most patients (94%) experienced seizure termination with these two therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Midazolam and pentobarbital remain the mainstay of continuous infusion therapy for refractory status epilepticus in the pediatric patient. The majority of patients experience seizure termination within a median of 30 hours. These data have implications for the design and feasibility of future intervention trials. That is, testing a new anesthetic anticonvulsant after failure of both midazolam and pentobarbital is unlikely to be feasible in a pediatric study, whereas a decision to test an alternative to pentobarbital, after midazolam failure, may be possible in a multicenter multinational study.

Temporal Coordination of Hippocampal Neurons Reflects Cognitive Outcome Post-febrile Status Epilepticus

The coordination of dynamic neural activity within and between neural networks is believed to underlie normal cognitive processes. Conversely, cognitive deficits that occur following neurological insults may result from network discoordination. We hypothesized that cognitive outcome following febrile status epilepticus (FSE) depends on network efficacy within and between fields CA1 and CA3 to dynamically organize cell activity by theta phase. Control and FSE rats were trained to forage or perform an active avoidance spatial task. FSE rats were sorted by those that were able to reach task criterion (FSE-L) and those that could not (FSE-NL). FSE-NL CA1 place cells did not exhibit phase preference in either context and exhibited poor cross-theta interaction between CA1 and CA3. FSE-L and control CA1 place cells exhibited phase preference at peak theta that shifted during active avoidance to the same static phase preference observed in CA3. Temporal coordination of neuronal activity by theta phase may therefore explain variability in cognitive outcome following neurological insults in early development.