Magnetic resonance imaging versus Acute Physiology And Chronic Healthy Evaluation II score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis

The Clinical Value of Serum Creatinine-to-Bilirubin Ratio in Predicting the Severity and Prognosis of Acute Pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

Bilirubin (BIL) and creatinine (Cr) have long been recognized as potential early indicators of disease severity. A recent study found that the Cr-to-BIL ratio (CTR) was more sensitive and specific than either serum Cr or BIL alone. Our research focused on the clinical significance of CTR in evaluating the severity and prognosticating outcomes of acute pancreatitis (AP) in patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with AP at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 were included. The analysis then focused on examining the relationship between CTR levels and the severity of the illness, the occurrence of complications, and the prognosticating outcomes for individuals diagnosed with AP. A total of 286 AP patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Multivariate regression analyses indicated that AP patients with elevated CTR levels were more likely to develop severe AP. They exhibited higher MODS, Ranson, and APACHE-II scores, an increased incidence of organ failures (acute heart failure [AHF], acute kidney injury [AKI], and acute myocardial infarction), higher 30-day all-cause mortality rates, and a worse prognosis, often requiring more frequent use of vasoactive and diuretic agents compared to those with lower CTR levels. When CTR >14.05, AP patients had increased occurrence of AHF and AKI, higher 30-day all-cause mortality rates, more frequently using vasoactive agent and diuretic agent. Besides, the disease severity scores (MODS, Ranson, and APACHE-II) and hospital stays were markedly increased.

CONCLUSION

AP patients with elevated CTR levels are prone to more severe disease progression, increased complications, and poorer outcomes compared to those with lower CTR levels.

Acute pancreatitis: A review of diagnosis, severity prediction and prognosis assessment from imaging technology, scoring system and artificial intelligence

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially life-threatening inflammatory disease of the pancreas, with clinical management determined by the severity of the disease. Diagnosis, severity prediction, and prognosis assessment of AP typically involve the use of imaging technologies, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, and scoring systems, including Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Bedside Index for Severity in AP scores. Computed tomography is considered the gold standard imaging modality for AP due to its high sensitivity and specificity, while magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound can provide additional information on biliary obstruction and vascular complications. Scoring systems utilize clinical and laboratory parameters to classify AP patients into mild, moderate, or severe categories, guiding treatment decisions, such as intensive care unit admission, early enteral feeding, and antibiotic use. Despite the central role of imaging technologies and scoring systems in AP management, these methods have limitations in terms of accuracy, reproducibility, practicality and economics. Recent advancements of artificial intelligence (AI) provide new opportunities to enhance their performance by analyzing vast amounts of clinical and imaging data. AI algorithms can analyze large amounts of clinical and imaging data, identify scoring system patterns, and predict the clinical course of disease. AI-based models have shown promising results in predicting the severity and mortality of AP, but further validation and standardization are required before widespread clinical application. In addition, understanding the correlation between these three technologies will aid in developing new methods that can accurately, sensitively, and specifically be used in the diagnosis, severity prediction, and prognosis assessment of AP through complementary advantages.

MR Imaging for Early Extrapancreatic Necrosis in Acute Pancreatitis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To study the MRI characteristics of early extrapancreatic necrosis and compare them with those of peripancreatic fluid collections in acute pancreatitis (AP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 70 AP patients who had extrapancreatic collections visible on MRI within 1 week of onset. Extrapancreatic collections were divided into extrapancreatic necrosis and peripancreatic fluid collections based on follow-up MRI, CT, or pathology. The number and area of extrapancreatic collections, extrapancreatic inflammation on MRI (EPIM) score, MR severity index score and clinical characteristics were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the seventy AP patients, 32 (45.7%) had extrapancreatic necrosis, and 38 (54.3%) had peripancreatic fluid collections. The number and area of extrapancreatic collections, MR severity index score, EPIM score, and prevalence of associated hemorrhage were significantly higher in extrapancreatic necrosis patients than in those with peripancreatic fluid collections (p < 0.001). Among the single indicators, the accuracy of the area of extrapancreatic collections (AUC = 0.871) was comparable to that of the EPIM score for predicting extrapancreatic necrosis and was significantly higher than that of the other two indicators. The combination of all indicators showed the highest predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.949), and combinations of two or more indicators demonstrated significantly higher predictive accuracy for extrapancreatic necrosis than any single indicator (p < 0.05) except for the area of extrapancreatic collections (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The MRI characteristics have the potential to differentiate early extrapancreatic necrosis from peripancreatic fluid collections and help indicate extrapancreatic necrosis.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics Models to Predict Early Extrapancreatic Necrosis in Acute Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate radiomics models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting early extrapancreatic necrosis (EXPN) in acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted images of extrapancreatic collections and late arterial-phase images of the pancreatic parenchyma for 135 enrolled patients (94 in the primary cohort, including 47 EXPN patients and 41 in the validation cohort, including 20 EXPN patients). The optimal features after dimension reduction were used for radiomics modeling through a support vector machine. A clinical model, the MR severity index score, and extrapancreatic inflammation on MRI were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve optimal features from the extrapancreatic collection images and 10 from the pancreatic parenchyma images were selected for modeling. The pancreatic parenchyma-based and extrapancreatic collection-based radiomics models showed good predictive accuracy in both the training and validation cohorts. The areas under the curve of the extrapancreatic collection-based radiomics model (0.969 and 0.976) were consistent with those of the pancreatic parenchyma-based model (0.931 and 0.921) for both cohorts and better than those of the clinical model and imaging scores for both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI-based radiomics models of both the extrapancreatic collections and the pancreatic parenchyma had excellent predictive performance for early EXPN.

Ranson score to stratify severity in Acute Pancreatitis remains valid - Old is gold

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal disease with a wide spectrum of severity and morbidity. Developed in 1974, the Ranson score was the first scoring system to prognosticate AP. Over the past decades, while the Ranson score remains widely used, it was identified to have certain limitations, such as having low predictive power. It has also been criticized for its 48-hour requirement for computation of the final score, which has been argued to potentially delay management. With advancements in our understanding of AP, is the Ranson score still relevant as an effective prognostication system for AP?Areas covered: This review summarizes the available evidence comparing Ranson score with other conventional and novel scoring systems, in terms of prognostic accuracy, benefits, limitations and clinical applicability. It also evaluates the effectiveness of Ranson score with regard to the Revised Atlanta Classification.Expert opinion: The Ranson score consistently exhibits comparable prognostic accuracy to other newer scoring systems, and the 48-hour timeframe for computing the full Ranson score is an inherent strength, not a weakness. These aspects, coupled with relative ease of use, practicality and universality of the score, advocate for the continued relevance of the Ranson score in modern clinical practice.

Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Severity Assessment of Acute Pancreatitis

The incidence and prevalence of acute pancreatitis (AP) is increasing over time. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is established by revised Atlanta criteria (2012). Multiple criteria and scoring systems have been used for assessment of severity of AP. Majority of acute pancreatitis cases (80%) are mild, the challenge remains in early diagnosis, severity assessment and treatment of severe AP and its complications. Assessment of severity of AP is important part of management because line of treatment depends on aetiology and severity of acute pancreatitis. In this article a comprehensive review of recent advances in diagnosis and severity assessment of acute pancreatitis has been described.

Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With a Medical History of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Clinical Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics

OBJECTIVE

To determine the characteristics of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)-related acute pancreatitis (AP) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Retrospectively studied 262 patients with AP were admitted to our institution and underwent MRI. Diagnosis of T2DM-related AP was based on clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, and MRI. Pancreatic/peripancreatic changes were assessed on MRI.

RESULTS

Fifty-three (20.2%) patients with T2DM-related AP and 209 (79.8%) with nondiabetic AP were enrolled. On MRI, a higher prevalence of necrotizing pancreatitis (P < 0.001), pancreatic necrosis >30% (57.5% vs 29.2%; P = 0.006), hemorrhage (35.8% vs 19.1%; P = 0.009), abdominal wall edema (67.9% vs 46.8%; P = 0.006), walled-off necrosis (43.2% vs 14.6%; P < 0.001), and infected collections (P < 0.001) were registered in T2DM with AP. T2DM-related AP sustained greater magnetic resonance severity index (mean, 5.1 [range, 2-10] vs 3.4 [range, 1-10]; P < 0.001), higher incidence of moderate and severe pancreatitis (69.8% vs 40.2%; P < 0.001), higher organ failure (45.3% vs 22%; P = 0.001), and prolonged hospitalization (mean, 25.2 [range, 10-63] vs 16 [range, 5-48] days; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 diabetes mellitus-related AP is more moderate-to-severe pancreatitis, and it correlates with MRI characteristics of the pancreas itself, hemorrhage, abdominal wall, and infected collections.

Chest computed tomography semi-quantitative pleural effusion and pulmonary consolidation are early predictors of acute pancreatitis severity

Background

To study the predictive value of semi-quantitative pleural effusion and pulmonary consolidation for acute pancreatitis (AP) severity.

Methods

Thorax-abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed on 309 consecutive AP patients in a single center. Among them, 196 were male, and 113 were female, and the average age was 50±16 years. The etiology of AP was biliary in 43.7% (n=135), hyperlipidemia in 22.0% (n=68), alcoholic in 7.4% (n=23), trauma in 0.6% (n=2), and postoperative status in 1.6% (n=5) cases; 24.6% (n=76) of patients did not have specified etiologies. The prevalence of pleural effusion and pulmonary consolidation was noted. The pleural effusion volume was quantitatively derived from a CT volume evaluation software tool. The pulmonary consolidation score was based on the number of lobes involved in AP. Each patient's CT severity index (CTSI), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system, and bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) scores were obtained. The semi-quantitative pleural effusion and pulmonary consolidation were compared to these scores and clinical outcomes by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analysis.

Results

In the 309 patients, 39.8% had pleural effusion, and 47.9% had pulmonary consolidation. The mean pleural effusion volume was 41.7±38.0 mL. The mean pulmonary consolidation score was 1.0±1.2 points. The mean CTSI was 3.7±1.8 points, the mean APACHE II score was 5.8±5.1 points, and the mean BISAP score was 1.3±1.0 points; 5.5% of patients developed severe AP, and 13.9% of patients developed organ failure. Pleural effusion volume and pulmonary consolidation scores correlated to the scores for the severity of AP. In predicting severe AP, the accuracy (AUC 0.839) of pleural effusion volume was similar to that of the CTSI score (P=0.961), APACHE II score (P=0.757), and BISAP score (P=0.906). The accuracy (AUC 0.805) of the pulmonary consolidation score was also similar to that of the CTSI score (P=0.503), APACHE II score (P=0.343), and BISAP score (P=0.669). In predicting organ failure, the accuracy (AUC 0.783) of pleural effusion volume was similar to that of the CTSI score (P=0.473), APACHE II score (P=0.119), and BISAP score (P=0.980), and the accuracy (AUC 0.808) of the pulmonary consolidation score was also similar to that of the CTSI score (P=0.236), APACHE II score (P=0.293), and BISAP score (P=0.612).

Conclusions

Pleural effusion and pulmonary consolidation are common in AP and correlated to the severity of AP. Furthermore, the pleural effusion volume and pulmonary consolidation lobes can provide early prediction of severe AP and organ failure.

Extrapancreatic Inflammation on Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Early Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity

OBJECTIVES

This work aimed to study the early predictive value of extrapancreatic inflammation on magnetic resonance imaging (EPIM) for acute pancreatitis (AP) severity.

METHODS

The EPIM score, magnetic resonance severity index, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, bedside index of severity in AP, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were evaluated for 337 AP patients. The extrapancreatic inflammation on computed tomography (EPIC) was also assessed for 86 patients undergoing computed tomography. The predictive values of these scores for severe AP and organ failure were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 337 AP patients, 55 (16.3%) had organ failure and 17 (5.0%) had severe AP. The EPIM showed a strong correlation with the EPIC (r = 0.794, P < 0.001) and had a higher correlation with the APACHE II and hospital stay compared with the EPIC. The accuracy of the EPIM in predicting severe AP and organ failure (areas under the curve, 0.844 and 0.817) was consistent with that of the APACHE II and bedside index of severity in AP, and higher than that of the magnetic resonance severity index.

CONCLUSION

The EPIM is more helpful in assessing AP severity than the EPIC and can indicate the occurrence of severe AP and organ failure early.

Current concepts for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Acute pancreatitis is classically characterized by acute chemical inflammation of the pancreatic gland itself, peripancreatic tissues, and even remote organs. The newly revised Atlanta Classification 2012 redefined the patterns of pancreatic necrosis and local complications in acute pancreatitis. The Atlanta Classification's novelty was in emphasizing that extrapancreatic fat necrosis, which leads to walled-off necrosis, is associated with poor prognosis. Conversely, the free fluid liquid was considered to be less related to complications. The Atlanta's classification's main weakness is that it is mainly computed tomography (CT) based, as contrast-enhanced CT is the predominant imaging technique used for evaluating a wide range of pathological processes of acute pancreatitis. However, some local complications are difficult to distinguish accurately on CT. Recent advances, including significantly better soft-tissue contrast, favor multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for a more comprehensive assessment of acute pancreatitis pathology, particularly for small necrotic/fat debris within a collection. In addition, the MRI severity index (MRSI), which combines Balthazar's grade points and points of the extent of pancreatic necrosis, has been proven to be crucial for the initial evaluation, staging, and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. Other innovations, such as the recognition of important MRI features in acute pancreatitis and the utilization of newer, more effective terminology for imaging reporting assistance in the differentiation of the common local complications following this disease, have improved the treatment for acute pancreatitis. In this paper, with reference to the 2012 revised Atlanta classification, we review the strengths and limitations of MRI for identifying acute pancreatitis, the MRI findings of a spectrum of pathological entities, and the important local complications secondary to acute pancreatitis.

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Measuring Pancreatic Perfusion in Acute Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the characteristics of pancreatic perfusion in normal pancreas and acute pancreatitis (AP) by using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Eighty-One AP patients and 26 normal subjects underwent DCE-MRI. The Omitk-Tool was used to analyze perfusion parameters such as K^trans, V_p^, and AUC. The parameters of pancreas between AP and control groups were compared. In AP patients, the parameters were compared between edematous and necrotizing pancreatitis and among different grades of AP as determined by MR severity index (MRSI) and the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification of AP.

RESULTS

The K^trans, V_p^, and AUC values of AP were lower than those of the control group (p = 0.007, 0.000, and 0.025). According to MRSI, the K^trans and AUC values were significantly different between mild and moderate (p = 0.000, 0.000) and between mild and severe (p = 0.008, 0.016) AP but not between moderate and severe AP (p = 0.218, 0.217). Based on the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification, the K^trans values were significantly different between mild and moderately severe (p = 0.000) and between mild and severe (p = 0.005) AP, but not between moderately severe and severe AP (p = 0.619). The K^trans values were significantly different between edematous and necrotizing pancreatitis (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The application of DCE-MRI to evaluate pancreatic perfusion contributes to the diagnosis of AP and its severity grade. Pancreatic perfusion is lower in AP patients than in patients with a normal pancreas, and pancreatic perfusion tends to decrease as the severity of AP increases.

MR imaging for acute pancreatitis: the current status of clinical applications

Acute pancreatitis is a common clinical acute abdomen. Imaging examinations play an important role in the management of acute pancreatitis. MR imaging is a noninvasive examination with high tissue contrast and a variety of acquisition sequences that can help determine the diagnosis, complications and severity of acute pancreatitis. The acute pancreatitis classification working group modified the Atlanta classification in 2012 to improve clinical evaluations and standardize the radiologic nomenclature for acute pancreatitis. In particular, the redefinition of necrotizing pancreatitis offers a new understanding of this disease. In clinical practice, there is still a lack of unifying standards between radiologists and physicians, such as for the imaging features of pseudocysts, walled-off necrosis, peripancreatic necrosis and especially for the MR imaging features of acute pancreatitis. In this article, we review the 2012 revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis and recent advances in the clinical applications of MR imaging (MRI) in acute pancreatitis by showing how MRI can provide more optimized information for clinical diagnosis and treatment plan.

Sinistral Portal Hypertension in Acute Pancreatitis: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to study the prevalence and characteristics of sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) in acute pancreatitis (AP) and its correlation with the severity of AP.

METHODS

Retrospectively studied 633 patients with AP admitted to our institution and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Diagnosis of SPH was based on clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, and MRI. The venous system and pancreatitis were evaluated on T1 weighted imaging, T2 weighted imaging, and dynamic-enhancement MRI. Data on patients' demographics, etiology, organ failure, MR severity index, and clinical outcomes were all collected.

RESULTS

The SPH was detected in 21 patients (3.3%, 21/633). There was no statistical difference in organ failure between patients with SPH and without SPH (P > 0.05). The prevalence of SPH in males and females was 5.1% (17/336) versus 1.3% (4/297) (χ(2) = 6.775, P = 0.009), in edematous and necrotizing AP was 0.4% (2/510) versus 15.5% (19/123) (χ(2) = 65.413, P = 0.000), and in mild, moderate, and severe AP, based on MR severity index, were 0.6% (2/334) versus 2.9% (8/276) versus 47.8% (11/23) (χ(2) = 55.977, P = 0.000), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPH rarely occurs in AP, and its risk is higher in males. Its presence is strongly associated with the local conditions of pancreatitis.

MR imaging of hemorrhage associated with acute pancreatitis

PURPOSE

To study MRI findings of hemorrhage in acute pancreatitis (AP) and correlate the presence and extent of hemorrhage with the MR severity index (MRSI), Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, and clinical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 539 patients with AP. Hemorrhage was defined as areas of hyperintensity in or outside the pancreas on liver imaging with volume acceleration flexible (LAVA-Flex). The presence of hemorrhage was classified into three areas: within the pancreatic parenchyma, retroperitoneal space, and sub-or intraperitoneal space. Involvement of each area was awarded 1 point resulting in the hemorrhage severity index (HSI) score. The predicted severity of AP was graded by MRSI and APACHE II score. The association between HSI, MRSI, and APACHE II scores was analyzed. The length of hospital stay and organ dysfunction was used as clinical outcome parameters.

RESULTS

Among 539 AP patients, 62 (11.5%) had hemorrhage. The prevalence of hemorrhage was 1.1% (2/186), 13.9% (43/310), and 39.5% (17/43) in predicted mild, moderate, and severe AP, respectively, based on MRSI (χ² = 55.3, p = 0.00); and 7.7% (21/273) and 19.2% (18/94) in predicted mild and severe AP, respectively, based on APACHE II (χ² = 21.2, p = 0.00). HSI score significantly correlated with MRSI (r = 0.36, p < 0.001) and APACHE II scores (r = 0.21, p = 0.00). The prevalence of organ dysfunction was higher and length of hospital stay was longer in patients with hemorrhage than in those without hemorrhage (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemorrhage in AP is common. The presence of hemorrhage, rather than its extent, correlates with poor clinical outcome.

Endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood may serve as a biological marker to predict severe acute pancreatitis

AIM

To investigate the significance of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in predicting severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

METHODS

We recruited 71 patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) and excluded 11 of them; finally, cases of mild acute pancreatitis (MAP) (n = 30) and SAP (n = 30), and healthy volunteers (n = 20) were internalized to investigate levels of EPCs, C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), fibrinogen (FIB) and white blood cells (WBC) in peripheral blood.

RESULTS

The levels of TNF-α, WBC, FIB and CRP were higher both in SAP and MAP cases than in healthy volunteers (P < 0.05, all). Interestingly, the level of EPCs was higher in SAP than MAP (1.63% ± 1.47% vs 6.61% ± 4.28%, P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference between the MAP cases and healthy volunteers (1.63% ± 1.47% vs 0.55% ± 0.54%, P > 0.05). Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) showed that EPCs, TNF-α, CRP and FIB were significantly associated with SAP, especially EPCs and CRP were optimal predictive markers of SAP. When the cut-off point for EPCs and CRP were 2.26% and 5.94 mg/dL, the sensitivities were 90.0% and 73.3%, and the specificities were 83.3% and 96.7%. Although, CRP had the highest specificity, and EPCs had the highest sensitivity and highest area under the curve value (0.93).

CONCLUSION

Data suggest that EPCs may be a new biological marker in predicting SAP.

Preliminary Study of MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Pancreas for the Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of differentiating between acute pancreatitis (AP) and healthy pancreas using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and correlate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) /fractional anisotropy (FA) values with the severity of AP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

66 patients diagnosed with AP and 20 normal controls (NC) underwent DTI sequences and routine pancreatic MR sequences on a 3.0T MRI scanner. Average ADC and FA values of the pancreatic were measured. Differences of FA and ADC values between the AP group and the NC group with AP and healthy pancreas were compared by two-sample independent t-test. The severity of AP on MRI was classified into subgroups using MR severity index (MRSI), where the mean FA and ADC values were calculated. Relationship among the FA values, ADC values and MRSI were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The pancreatic mean ADC value in the AP group (1.68 ± 0.45×10-3mm2/s) was significantly lower than in the NC group (2.09 ± 0.55×10-3mm2/s) (P = 0.02); the same as mean FA value (0.39 ± 0.23 vs 0.54 ± 0.12, P = 0.00). In the subgroup analysis, the pancreatic ADC and FA value of edema AP patients was significantly higher than necrosis AP patients with P = 0.000 and P = 0.001respectively. In addition, as severity of pancreatitis increased according to MRSI, lower pancreatic ADC (r = -0.635) and FA value (r = -0.654) were noted.

CONCLUSION

Both FA and ADC value from DTI can be used to differentiate AP patients from NC. Both ADC and FA value of pancreas have a negative correlation with the severity of AP.

Retrocrural space involvement on computed tomography as a predictor of mortality and disease severity in acute pancreatitis

Background

Because computed tomography (CT) has advantages for visualizing the manifestation of necrosis and local complications, a series of scoring systems based on CT manifestations have been developed for assessing the clinical outcomes of acute pancreatitis (AP), including the CT severity index (CTSI), modified CTSI, etc. Despite the internationally accepted CTSI having been successfully used to predict the overall mortality and disease severity of AP, recent literature has revealed the limitations of the CTSI. Using the Delphi method, we establish a new scoring system based on retrocrural space involvement (RCSI), and compared its effectiveness at evaluating the mortality and severity of AP with that of the CTSI.

Methods

We reviewed CT images of 257 patients with AP taken within 3–5 days of admission in 2012. The RCSI scoring system, which includes assessment of infectious conditions involving the retrocrural space and the adjacent pleural cavity, was established using the Delphi method. Two radiologists independently assessed the RCSI and CTSI scores. The predictive points of the RCSI and CTSI scoring systems in evaluating the mortality and severity of AP were estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Principal Findings

The RCSI score can accurately predict the mortality and disease severity. The area under the ROC curve for the RCSI versus CTSI score was 0.962±0.011 versus 0.900±0.021 for predicting the mortality, and 0.888±0.025 versus 0.904±0.020 for predicting the severity of AP. Applying ROC analysis to our data showed that a RCSI score of 4 was the best cutoff value, above which mortality could be identified.

Conclusion

The Delphi method was innovatively adopted to establish a scoring system to predict the clinical outcome of AP. The RCSI scoring system can predict the mortality of AP better than the CTSI system, and the severity of AP equally as well.

Early phase of acute pancreatitis: Assessment and management

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a potentially life-threatening disease with a wide spectrum of severity. The overall mortality of AP is approximately 5%. According to the revised Atlanta classification system, AP can be classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Severe AP often takes a clinical course with two phases, an early and a late phase, which should both be considered separately. In this review article, we first discuss general aspects of AP, including incidence, pathophysiology, etiology, and grading of severity, then focus on the assessment of patients with suspected AP, including diagnosis and risk stratification, followed by the management of AP during the early phase, with special emphasis on fluid therapy, pain management, nutrition, and antibiotic prophylaxis.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the normal mesostenium and involvement of the mesostenium in acute pancreatitis

The main point of this paper is to study MRI findings of the normal mesostenium and the involvement of the mesostenium in acute pancreatitis and to discuss the relationship between the involvement of the mesostenium and the severity of acute pancreatitis. In clinical practice, the mesenterical involvement in acute pancreatitis was often observed on MRI in daily works, which was little recorded in the reported studies. We conducted the current study to assess the mesenterical involvement in acute pancreatitis with MRI. We found that the mesenterical involvement of acute pancreatitis patients is common on MRI. The mesenterical involvement has a positive correlation with the MR severity index and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Healthy Evaluation II scoring system. It has been shown that MR can be used to visualize mesenterical involvement, which is a supplementary indicator in evaluating the severity of acute pancreatitis and local and systemic complications.

The normal transverse mesocolon and involvement of the mesocolon in acute pancreatitis: an MRI study

Objective

To study the MRI findings of the normal transverse mesocolon and the involvement of the mesocolon in acute pancreatitis (AP) as well as the relationship between the involvement of the mesocolon and the severity of AP.

Materials and Methods

Forty patients without pancreatic disorders were retrospectively analyzed to observe the normal transverse mesocolon using MRI; 210 patients with AP confirmed by clinical and laboratory tests were retrospectively analyzed using MRI to observe transverse-mesocolon involvement (TMI). The severity of TMI was recorded as zero points (no abnormalities and transverse-mesocolon vessel involvement), one point (linear and patchy signal in the transverse mesocolon) or two points (transverse-mesocolon effusion). The AP severity was graded by the MRI severity index (MRSI) and the Acute Physiology And Chronic Healthy Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system. The correlations of TMI with MRSI and APACHE-II were analyzed.

Results

In a normal transverse mesocolon, the display rates of the middle colic artery, the middle colic vein and the gastrocolic trunk on MRI were 95.0%, 82.5% and 100.0%, respectively. Of the 210 patients with AP, 130 patients (61.9%) had TMI. According to the TMI grading, 40%, 39% and 20% of the patients were graded at zero, one and two points, respectively. TMI was strongly correlated with the MRSI score (r = 0.759, P = 0.000) and the APACHE-II score (r = 0.384, P = 0.000).

Conclusion

MRI could be used to visualize transverse-mesocolon involvement. The severity of TMI could reflect that of AP in the clinical setting and imaging. TMI might be a supplementary indicator of the severity of AP.

Hepatic abnormal perfusion visible by magnetic resonance imaging in acute pancreatitis

AIM: To study the prevalence and patterns of hepatic abnormal perfusion (HAP) visible by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute pancreatitis (AP).

METHODS: Enhanced abdominal MRI was performed on 51 patients with AP. These patients were divided into two groups according to the MRI results: those with signs of gallstones, cholecystitis, common bile duct (CBD) stones or dilatation of the CBD on MRI and those without. The prevalence, shape and distribution of HAP in the two groups were analyzed and compared. The severity of AP was graded using the MR severity index (MRSI). The correlation between the MRSI and HAP was then analyzed.

RESULTS: Of the 51 patients with AP, 32 (63%) showed at least one sign of gallbladder and CBD abnormalities on the MR images, while 19 (37%) showed no sign of gallbladder or CBD abnormalities. Nineteen patients (37%) had HAP visible in the enhanced images, including strip-, wedge- or patch-shaped HAP distributed in the hepatic tissue adjacent to the gallbladder and left and right liver lobes. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of HAP (χ² = 0.305, P = 0.581 > 0.05) or HAP distribution in the liver (χ² = 2.181, P = 0.536 > 0.05) between patients with and without gallbladder and CBD abnormalities. There were no significant differences in the MRSI score between patients with and without HAP (t = 0.559, P = 0.552 > 0.05). HAP was not correlated with the MRSI score.

CONCLUSION: HAP is common in patients with AP and appears strip-, patch- or wedge-shaped on MRI. HAP on MRI cannot be used to indicate the severity of AP.

Criteria for the diagnosis and severity stratification of acute pancreatitis

Recent diagnostic and therapeutic progress for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) remarkably decreased the case-mortality rate. To further decrease the mortality rate of SAP, it is important to precisely evaluate the severity at an early stage, and initiate appropriate treatment as early as possible. Research Committee of Intractable Diseases of the Pancreas in Japan developed simpler criteria combining routinely available data with clinical signs. Severity can be evaluated by laboratory examinations or by clinical signs, reducing the defect values of the severity factors. Moreover, the severity criteria considered laboratory/clinical severity scores and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) findings as independent risk factors. Thus, CE-CT scans are not necessarily required to evaluate the severity of acute pancreatitis. There was no fatal case in mild AP diagnosed by the CE-CT severity score, whereas case-mortality rate in those with SAP was 14.8%. Case-mortality of SAP that fulfilled both the laboratory/clinical and the CE-CT severity criteria was 30.8%. It is recommended, therefore, to perform CE-CT examination to clarify the prognosis in those patients who were diagnosed as SAP by laboratory/clinical severity criteria. Because the mortality rate of these patients with SAP is high, such patients should be transferred to advanced medical units.

Outcome assessment in acute pancreatitis patients

Early diagnosis and severity evaluation in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) are very important due to its potential morbidity and mortality. Several clinical, laboratory, and radiologic factors, and many scoring systems have been proposed for outcome prediction. Although the Ranson and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring systems have been widely used for decades, the cumbersome components partly limit their predictability. Recently, the Bedside Index for Severity in AP scoring system and series blood urea nitrogen changes, which are simple and convenient to evaluate within 24 hours after admission, have been validated for accuracy by several large-cohort studies. The presence of organ failure and systemic inflammatory response syndrome are also helpful to evaluate the severity of AP. Herein we review recent advances of the predictive methods for AP to provide an up-to-date perspective on outcome assessment of AP.

MR imaging of acute pancreatitis: correlation of abdominal wall edema with severity scores

OBJECTIVE

To study MRI findings of abdominal wall edema (AWE) in acute pancreatitis as well as correlations between AWE and the severity of acute pancreatitis according to the MR severity index (MRSI) and the Acute Physiology And Chronic Healthy Evaluation III (APACHE III) scoring system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 160 patients with AP admitted to our institution between December 2009 and March 2011 were included in this study. MRI was performed within 48 h after admission. MRI findings of acute pancreatitis were noted, including AWE on the MRI. The abdominal wall area was divided into quarters, and each area involved was recorded as 1 point to score the severity of AWE. The severity of acute pancreatitis was studied using both the MRSI and the APACHE III scoring system. Spearman correlation of AWE with the MRSI and the APACHE III scoring system was analyzed.

RESULTS

In 160 patients with acute pancreatitis, 53.8% had AWE on MRI. The average AWE score was 1.2±1.4 points. The prevalence of AWE was 30.5%, 64.5% and 100% in mild, moderate and severe AP, respectively, according to MRSI. AWE on MRI was correlated with MRSI scores (r=0.441, p=0.000). According to APACHE III scores, the averages were 2.0±1.1 and 2.6±1.1 points in mild AP and severe AP, respectively (P=0.016). AWE was slightly correlated with the APACHE III scores (r=0.222, p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

AWE on MRI in acute pancreatitis is common, which may be a supplementary indicator in determining the severity of AP.

Gallbladder patterns in acute pancreatitis: an MRI study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the gallbladder patterns on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) associated with acute pancreatitis (AP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 197 patients with AP, all of whom had undergone abdominal MRI. AP was categorized as either edematous or necrotizing according to its findings on MRI and graded as mild (0-3 points), moderate (4-6 points), or severe (7-10 points) according to the magnetic resonance severity index. The changes to the walls and dimensions of the gallbladder and common bile duct, in addition to the presence of biliary stones and pericholecystic fluid, were noted and compared with the severity of AP on the basis of the magnetic resonance severity index.

RESULTS

Of the 197 patients with AP, 81% were classified as edematous and 19% as necrotizing on MRI. There were 35%, 59%, and 6% of patients with mild, moderate, and severe AP according to the magnetic resonance severity index, respectively. Seventy-six percent of patients had at least one gallbladder abnormality on MRI, including a thickened gallbladder wall (42%), pericholecystic fluid (38%), gallbladder stones (35%), an enlarged gallbladder (24%), dilatation of the common bile duct (16%), and subserosal edema (15%). Eighty-nine percent of patients (34 of 38) with necrotizing AP had gallbladder abnormalities, which was significantly higher than the 72% of patients (115 of 159) with edematous AP (P < .05). The prevalence of gallbladder abnormalities was 64% in patients with mild AP, 81% in those with moderate AP, and 91% in those with severe AP (P < .05 among the three groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with AP have gallbladder abnormalities on MRI, including a thickened gallbladder wall and pericholecystic fluid. The prevalence of gallbladder abnormalities has a positive correlation with the severity of AP on MRI.

Predicting Acute Pancreatitis Severity: Comparison of Prognostic Scores

Background

Acute pancreatitis has a broad clinical spectrum, from mild illness to multiple organ failure and death. Prognostic scores have been developed or adapted to predict disease severity. This study aimed to compare the prognostic scores according to sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve. Statistical correlation with disease severity, length of hospital stay, mortality and complication rates.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients admitted to an Internal Medicine ward with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis over a ten year period. Evaluation of prognostic scores: Ranson, Glasgow-Imrie, Balthazar, APACHE II (admission and at 48 hours) and C-reactive protein (48 hours), was carried out as well as statistical analysis using Microsoft Excel 2007® and SPSS 16®. The confidence interval used was 95%.

Results

Data from 193 clinical files was collected. However, 67 were excluded due to lack of information. According to the Atlanta criteria, 90 cases were deemed as mild and 36 severe. The mortality rate was 6% and the local complication rate was 9.3%. Ranson, Glasgow and APACHE II scores had significant correlation with mortality. Apart from C-reactive protein levels at 48 hours, all scores had significant correlation with disease severity. The scores with best area under the curve correlation were APACHE II (48 hours): 0.892, Ranson: 0.879, and APACHE II (admission): 0.861.

Conclusions

The most accurate prognostic scores in this study were APACHE II (48 hours) and Ranson. APACHE II at admission was a good indicator, impaired only by high false positive ratio.