High-pitch coronary CT angiography in dual-source CT during free breathing vs. breath holding in patients with low heart rates

CT annulus sizing prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): evaluation of free-breathing versus breath-holding acquisition

OBJECTIVES

To assess feasibility and accuracy of aortic annulus measurements using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed during free-breathing prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty consecutive TAVR candidates underwent free-breathing wide-detector cardiac CTA, followed by a percutaneous valve replacement. For each, a theoretical valve size was suggested through CT measurements of the annulus, then compared to the size of the actual implanted transcatheter heart valve (THV). The procedural success and the 30-day outcomes were collected. Image quality of the annulus was also studied according to subjective and objective criteria. Data of a control group of 60 patients previously evaluated on breath-holding were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients (mean age, 83 years ± 7, 60 men) were evaluated. All CT acquisitions provided sufficient image quality allowing precise annulus measurements. Mean attenuation (p < 0.001) and image noise (p = 0.01) were higher in the free-breathing group, while image quality was comparable (p = 0.36). The agreement rate between CT-suggested valve size and THV implanted size was comparable, estimated at 87% (κ = 0.79, 95%CI 0.566, 0.908) on free-breathing vs. 82% (κ = 0.78, 95%CI 0.634, 0.904) on breath-holding. The procedure was successful for all patients without increase in 30-day mortality or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Free-breathing cardiac CTA allows accurate aortic annulus measurements without compromising image quality or patients' outcome after TAVR. Elderly patients experiencing dyspnea, discomfort, or hearing loss that could prevent proper breath-holding should not be excluded from CT prior to TAVR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

To decrease elderly patients' discomfort, MDCT evaluation prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be performed on quiet breathing with no significant impact on the outcome.

KEY POINTS

• Adhering to CT breathing commands can be challenging for patients with dyspnea, hearing impairment, agitation, or pulmonary diseases. • Free-breathing cardiac CT may be an alternative to breath-holding for patients unable to follow the breathing commands. • Wide-detector CT acquisition on free-breathing does not impair annulus measurements and prosthesis sizing in patients scheduled for TAVR.

Application of Esmolol to Control Heart Rate and Artificial Intelligence Reconstruction Analysis for Rapid Zero-Cooperation Emergency Coronary CTA

Objective

To investigate a rapid and effective method for the examination of coronary CTA in emergency patients requiring coronary CTA examination, who have faster heart rate (≧80 bpm) or cannot cooperate with the examination due to the inability of breath holding at poor physical conditions.

Methods

Before coronary CTA examination, with the ECG monitoring, intravenous injection of esmolol was given to achieve rapid heart rate reduction. Without the patient's cooperation, coronary CTA examination was then performed in a quick and effective manner using the 640-slice high-speed CT. The diagnosis report was obtained through the subsequent reconstruction analysis using artificial intelligence software.

Conclusion

Esmolol injection can rapidly reduce the heart rate of normal people during exercise and at rest, and the steady blood concentration can be reached in 2 minutes. The half-life is about 5 minutes, with short duration and fewer side effects on patients. The diagnostic rate of coronary artery segment using (excellent + good) CTA image of the patients with esmolol and artificial intelligence analysis in the experimental group was 95.4%, while the diagnostic rate was 91.1% in the control group, and there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Esmolol injection can rapidly reduce heart rate in patients with high heart rate, without holding breath or long-term preoperative preparation; the combination with the analysis of subsequent artificial intelligence reconstruction is a new method for rapid and effective coronary CTA examination in all patients.

Radiation Dose and Image Quality of a High-Pitch Prospective Spiral First Approach in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA)

Objective: To investigate a high-pitch spiral first (HPSF) approach for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in an unselected patient cohort and compare diagnostic yield and radiation exposure to CCTAs acquired via conventional, non-high-pitch spiral first (NHPSF) scan regimes. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017 were included. Two investigation protocols (HPSF/NHPSF) were used with the aim to achieve diagnostic image quality of all coronary segments. Low-pitch secondary scans followed the initial examination if image quality was unsatisfactory. Dosage and image quality were compared between both regimes. Results: 1410 patients were subject to a HPSF and 236 patients to a NHPSF approach. While the HPSF approach led to a higher fraction of re-scans (35% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), the fraction of aggregate scans that remained non-diagnostic after considering the initial and secondary scan was comparably low for the HPSF and NHPSF approach (0.78 vs. 0%, p = 0.18). Aggregate radiation exposure in the HPSF protocol was significantly lower (1.12 mSv (IQR: 0.73, 2.10) vs. 3.96 mSv (IQR: 2.23, 8.33) p < 0.001). Conclusions: In spite of a higher number of re-scans, a HPSF approach leads to a reduction in overall radiation exposure with diagnostic yields similar to a NHPSF approach.

Improving the Degree and Uniformity of Enhancement in Coronary CT Angiography with a New Bolus Tracking Method Enabled By Free Breathing

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate the improved enhancement degree and uniformity in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) on a 16 cm wide-coverage CT with a new bolus tracking method enabled by free-breathing, in comparison with the conventional breath-holding method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 200 patients with suspected coronary heart disease were randomly divided into two groups for CCTA: Group A (n = 100, free-breathing) started CCTA with 2.2 seconds delay after the attenuation in aorta reached 250 HU; Group B (n = 100, breath-holding), used the standard protocol of 80 HU threshold and 8.4 seconds delay. Both groups used the contrast dose rate of 25 mgI/kg/s. CT value and standard deviation in aortic sinus (AS), right coronary artery, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and pericardial fat were measured. Contrast-to-noise ratio for vessels was calculated. Two experienced Radiologists independently reviewed image quality using a 5-point scale (1: nondiagnostic-5: excellent).

RESULTS

There was no difference in contrast dose, radiation dose, heart rate, and qualitative image quality between the two groups (all p > 0.05). However, Group A had higher mean enhancement in vessels (404 ± 66 HU) than Group B (321 ± 69 HU), and lower coefficients of variation of CT value in aortic sinus, right coronary artery, left anterior descending, and left circumflex (16.3%, 17.7%, 19.2%, and 20.5% vs 21.5%, 22.3%, 23.6%, and 22.9%, respectively), (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A new bolus tracking method enabled by free-breathing in CCTA on a 16 cm wide-coverage CT system increases the enhancement degree and uniformity in coronary arteries, compared with the conventional breath-holding method.

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of High-Pitch Dual-Source Spiral Cardiothoracic Computed Tomography in Young Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Comparison of Non-Electrocardiography Synchronization and Prospective Electrocardiography Triggering

Objective

To compare image quality and radiation dose of high-pitch dual-source spiral cardiothoracic computed tomography (CT) between non-electrocardiography (ECG)-synchronized and prospectively ECG-triggered data acquisitions in young children with congenital heart disease.

Materials and Methods

Eighty-six children (≤ 3 years) with congenital heart disease who underwent high-pitch dual-source spiral cardiothoracic CT were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into two groups (n = 43 for each; group 1 with non-ECG-synchronization and group 2 with prospective ECG triggering). Patient-related parameters, radiation dose, and image quality were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in patient-related parameters including age, cross-sectional area, body density, and water-equivalent area between the two groups (p > 0.05). Regarding radiation dose parameters, only volume CT dose index values were significantly different between group 1 (1.13 ± 0.09 mGy) and group 2 (1.07 ± 0.12 mGy, p < 0.02). Among image quality parameters, significantly higher image noise (3.8 ± 0.7 Hounsfield units [HU] vs. 3.3 ± 0.6 HU, p < 0.001), significantly lower signal-to-noise ratio (105.0 ± 28.9 vs. 134.1 ± 44.4, p = 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratio (84.5 ± 27.2 vs. 110.1 ± 43.2, p = 0.002), and significantly less diaphragm motion artifacts (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.7 ± 0.4, p < 0.04) were found in group 1 compared with group 2. Image quality grades of cardiac structures, coronary arteries, ascending aorta, pulmonary trunk, lung markings, and chest wall showed no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In high-pitch dual-source spiral pediatric cardiothoracic CT, additional ECG triggering does not substantially reduce motion artifacts in young children with congenital heart disease.

Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery From the Inappropriate Sinus of Valsalva

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) from the inappropriate sinus of Valsalva is increasingly recognized by cardiac imaging. Although most AAOCA subtypes are benign, autopsy studies report an associated risk of sudden death with interarterial anomalous left coronary artery (ALCA) and anomalous right coronary artery (ARCA). Despite efforts to identify high-risk ALCA and ARCA patients who may benefit from surgical repair, debate remains regarding their classification, prevalence, risk stratification, and management. We comprehensively reviewed 77 studies reporting the prevalence of AAOCA among >1 million patients, and 20 studies examining outcomes of interarterial ALCA/ARCA patients. Observational data suggests that interarterial ALCA is rare (weighted prevalence = 0.03%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01% to 0.04%) compared with interarterial ARCA (weighted prevalence = 0.23%; 95% CI: 0.17% to 0.31%). Recognizing the challenges in managing these patients, we review cardiac tests used to examine AAOCA and knowledge gaps in management.

Computed Tomography Angiography with a 192-slice Dual-source Computed Tomography System: Improvements in Image Quality and Radiation Dose

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare image quality, radiation dose, and the influence of the heart rate on image quality of high-pitch spiral coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using 128-slice (second generation) dual-source CT (DSCT) and a 192-slice DSCT (third generation) scanner.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two consecutive cohorts of fifty patients underwent CCTA by high-pitch spiral scan mode using 128 or 192-slice DSCT. The 192-slice DSCT system has a more powerful roentgen tube (2 × 120 kW) that allows CCTA acquisition at lower tube voltages, wider longitudinal coverage for faster table speed (732 m/s), and the use of iterative reconstruction. Objective image quality was measured as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality was evaluated using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

While the effective dose was lower with 192-slice DSCT (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.6 ± 0.3 mSv; P < 0.001), the SNR (18.9 ± 4.3 vs. 11.0 ± 2.9; P < 0.001) and CNR (23.5 ± 4.8 vs. 14.3 ± 4.1; P < 0.001) were superior to 128-slice DSCT. Although patients scanned with 192-slice DSCT had a faster heart rate (59 ± 7 vs. 56 ± 6; P = 0.045), subjective image quality was scored higher (4.2 ± 0.8 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7; P < 0.001) compared to 128-slice DSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

High-pitch spiral CCTA by 192-slice DSCT provides better image quality, despite a higher average heart rate, at lower radiation doses compared to 128-slice DSCT.

Feasibility of Free-breathing CCTA using 256-MDCT

Usually, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is performed during breath-holding to reduce artifact caused by respiration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of free-breathing CCTA compared to breath-holding using CT scanner with wide detector. To evaluate the feasibility of CCTA during free-breathing using a 256-MDCT. In 80 patients who underwent CCTA, 40 were performed during breath-holding (group A), and the remaining 40 during free-breathing (group B). The quality scores for coronary arteries were analyzed and defined as: 3 (excellent), 2 (good), and 1 (poor). The image noise, signal-to-noise ratio and effective radiation dose as well as the heart rate variation were compared. The noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and effective radiation dose were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The mean heart rate variation between planning and scanning for group A was 7 ± 7.6 bpm, and larger than 3 ± 2.6 bpm for group B (P = 0.012). Quality scores of the free-breathing group were better than those of the breath-holding group (group A: 2.55 ± 0.64, group B: 2.85 ± 0.36, P = 0.018). Free-breathing CCTA is feasible on wide detector CT scanner to provide acceptable image quality with reduced heart rate variation and better images for certain patients.

Feasibility of Respiratory-gated High-pitch Spiral CT:: Free-breathing Inspiratory Image Quality

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop and implement a respiratory-gated setup for dual-source computed tomography (CT) at high pitch to examine patients in a reproducible inspiratory phase.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients underwent free-breathing respiratory-gated chest CT using a high-pitch scan mode no more than 6 months after inspiratory breath-held nongated CT, which serves as reference. Scan parameters were as follows: pitch = 3.4, 128 × 0.6 mm collimation, 0.28 s gantry rotation time, and 150 ref.mAs per tube at 120 kV. The examinations were triggered using the tidal wave provided by a respiratory-gating system as input signal. Image quality was assessed focusing on artifacts and delineation of the anatomical and pathological structures. Lung volumes were measured on both free-breathing and reference examinations.

RESULTS

All examinations were performed without complications. Image quality was high with both protocols. Significantly less motion artifacts were recorded with the high-pitch mode compared to the reference (P = 0.02). Most of the artifacts were located in the peripheral parts of the lower lobes for the study group and in the central part of the left lower lobe for the reference. Average total lung volume was 4.5 ± 1.5 L in respiratory-gated examinations and 5.8 ± 0.9 L in examinations with breath-hold in inspiration.

CONCLUSIONS

High-pitch chest CT scanning during free breathing minimizes motion artifacts, improving image quality in patients with limited breath-holding abilities. To assure scanning in an inspiratory phase, data acquisition should be triggered with a respiratory-gating system.

Dual-source CT in blunt trauma patients: elimination of diaphragmatic motion using high-pitch spiral technique

The purpose of this study was to compare diaphragmatic motion on dual-source high-pitch (DS-HP) and conventional single-source (SS) CT scans in trauma patients. Seventy-five consecutive trauma patients who presented to a level one trauma center over a 6-month period were scanned with a standardized whole body trauma CT protocol including both DS-HP chest (pitch = 2.1-2.5) and SS abdominal CT scans. Subjective analysis of diaphragmatic motion was performed by two readers using a four-point motion scale in seven regions of the diaphragm on coronal and axial slices. An overall confidence score to exclude a diaphragmatic tear was determined (1 to 10, 10: completely confident and 1: impossible to exclude). Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for statistical analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Mean confidence score of 9.85 for DS-HP was significantly better than the mean score of 7.66 for SS images (p < 0.0001). Diaphragmatic motion scores and subjective diaphragmatic motion artifact on coronal and axial images were significantly better for DS-HP images in all areas when compared individually (p < 0.0001) and overall (p < 0.0001). Regions of DS-HP (99.2 %) were diagnostic, whereas only 87.0 % % regions on SS were. Complete agreement of motion scores was present in 92 % of cases, with moderate overall agreement for confidence to exclude a diaphragmatic tear (κ = 0.45). Dual-source high-pitch CT scanning is advantageous as it allows for significantly better evaluation of diaphragmatic structures by minimizing motion artifacts on images of freely breathing trauma patients.