Dark blood versus bright blood T2 acquisition in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for thalassaemia major (TM) patients: evaluation of feasibility, reproducibility and image quality

Assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage with dark-blood T2*-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) within myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events. Bright-blood T2*-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as the reference standard for non-invasive IMH detection. Despite this, the dark-blood T2*-based CMR is becoming interchangeably used with bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR in both clinical and preclinical settings for IMH detection. To date however, the relative merits of dark-blood T2*-weighted with respect to bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR for IMH characterization has not been studied. We investigated the diagnostic capacity of dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR against bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR for IMH characterization in clinical and preclinical settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hemorrhagic MI patients (n = 20) and canines (n = 11) were imaged in the acute and chronic phases at 1.5 and 3 T with dark- and bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR. Imaging characteristics (Relative signal-to-noise (SNR), Relative contrast-to-noise (CNR), IMH Extent) and diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area-under-the-curve, and inter-observer variability) of dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR for IMH characterization were assessed relative to bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR.

RESULTS

At both clinical and preclinical settings, compared to bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR, dark-blood T2*-weighted images had significantly lower SNR, CNR and reduced IMH extent (all p < 0.05). Dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR also demonstrated weaker sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and inter-observer variability compared to bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR (all p < 0.05). These observations were consistent across infarct age and imaging field strengths.

CONCLUSION

While IMH can be visible on dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR, the overall conspicuity of IMH is significantly reduced compared to that observed in bright-blood T2*-weighted images, across infarct age in clinical and preclinical settings at 1.5 and 3 T. Hence, bright-blood T2*-weighted CMR would be preferable for clinical use since dark-blood T2*-weighted CMR carries the potential to misclassify hemorrhagic MIs as non-hemorrhagic MIs.

Black-Blood Contrast in Cardiovascular MRI

MRI is a versatile technique that offers many different options for tissue contrast, including suppressing the blood signal, so‐called black‐blood contrast. This contrast mechanism is extremely useful to visualize the vessel wall with high conspicuity or for characterization of tissue adjacent to the blood pool. In this review we cover the physics of black‐blood contrast and different techniques to achieve blood suppression, from methods intrinsic to the imaging readout to magnetization preparation pulses that can be combined with arbitrary readouts, including flow‐dependent and flow‐independent techniques. We emphasize the technical challenges of black‐blood contrast that can depend on flow and motion conditions, additional contrast weighting mechanisms (T₁, T₂, etc.), magnetic properties of the tissue, and spatial coverage. Finally, we describe specific implementations of black‐blood contrast for different vascular beds.

Cardiac T2 * mapping: Techniques and clinical applications

Cardiac T₂* mapping is a noninvasive MRI method that is used to identify myocardial iron accumulation in several iron storage diseases such as hereditary hemochromatosis, sickle cell disease, and β‐thalassemia major. The method has improved over the years in terms of MR acquisition, focus on relative artifact‐free myocardium regions, and T₂* quantification. Several improvement factors involved include blood pool signal suppression, the reproducibility of T₂* measurement as affected by scanner hardware, and acquisition software. Regarding the T₂* quantification, improvement factors include the applied curve‐fitting method with or without truncation of the signals acquired at longer echo times and whether or not T₂* measurement focuses on multiple segmental regions or the midventricular septum only. Although already widely applied in clinical practice, data processing still differs between centers, contributing to measurement outcome variations. State of the art T₂* measurement involves pixelwise quantification providing better spatial iron loading information than region of interest‐based quantification. Improvements have been proposed, such as on MR acquisition for free‐breathing mapping, the generation of fast mapping, noise reduction, automatic myocardial contour delineation, and different T₂* quantification methods. This review deals with the pro and cons of different methods used to quantify T₂* and generate T₂* maps. The purpose is to recommend a combination of MR acquisition and T₂* mapping quantification techniques for reliable outcomes in measuring and follow‐up of myocardial iron overload. The clinical application of cardiac T₂* mapping for iron overload's early detection, monitoring, and treatment is addressed. The prospects of T₂* mapping combined with different MR acquisition methods, such as cardiac T₁ mapping, are also described.

Level of Evidence: 4

Technical Efficacy Stage: 5

J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.

Protocol optimization for cardiac and liver iron content assessment using MRI: What sequence should I use?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal MRI protocol and sequences for liver and cardiac iron estimation in children.

METHODS

We evaluated patients ≤18 years with cardiac and liver MRIs for iron content estimation. Liver T2 was determined by a third-party company. Cardiac and Liver T2* values were measured by an observer. Liver T2* values were calculated using the available liver parenchyma in the cardiac MRI. Linear correlations and Bland-Altman plots were run between liver T2 and T2*, cardiac T2* values; and liver T2* on dedicated cardiac and liver MRIs.

RESULTS

139 patients were included. Mean liver T2 and T2* values were 8.6 ± 5.4 ms and 4.5 ± 4.1 ms, respectively. A strong correlation between liver T2 and T2* values was observed (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) with a bias (+4.1 ms). Mean cardiac bright- and dark-blood T2* values were 26.5 ± 12.9 ms and 27.2 ± 11.9 ms, respectively. Cardiac T2* values showed a strong correlation (r = 0.81, p < 0.001) with a low bias (-1.0 ms). The mean liver T2* on liver and cardiac MRIs were 4.9 ± 4.7 ms and 4.6 ± 3.9 ms, respectively. A strong correlation between T2* values was observed (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) with a small bias (-0.2 ms).

CONCLUSION

MRI protocols for iron concentration in the liver and the heart can be simplified to avoid redundant information and reduce scan time. In most patients, a single breath-hold GRE sequence can be used to evaluate the iron concentration in both the liver and heart.

Estimation of liver iron concentration by dual energy CT images: influence of X-ray energy on sensitivity

In hemochromatosis an abnormal accumulation of iron is present in parenchymal organs and especially in liver. Among the several techniques employed to diagnose the iron overload, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) are the most promising non-invasive ones. MRI is largely used but shows limitation including an overestimation of iron and inability to quantify iron at very high concentrations. Therefore, some research groups are focusing on the estimation of iron concentration by CT images. Single X-ray CTs are not able to accurately perform this task in case of the presence of confounding factors (e.g., fat). A potential solution to overcome this concern is the employment of Dual-Energy CT (DECT). The aim of this work is to investigate influence of the kVp and mAs on CT number sensitivity to iron concentration. A phantom with test tubes filled with homogenized porcine liver at different iron concentrations, has been scanned with DECT at different mAs. The images have been analyzed using an ad-hoc developed algorithm which allows minimizing the influence of air bubbles present in the homogenized. Data show that the sensitivity is strongly influenced by kVp (its value almost halves from 80 kVp to 140 kVp; e.g. 0.41 g·μmol(-1) and 0.19 g·μmol(-1) at 80 kVp/120 mAs and 140 kVp/60 mAs respectively), on the other hand the influence of mAs value is negligible.