Papillary renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Differentiation of distinct histological types with contrast - enhanced ultrasonography

Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Current Role in Adults and Children for Various Indications

Intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a rapidly evolving imaging technique that uses a microbubble contrast agent to enhance ultrasonographic images by augmenting characterization of blood vessels and organ perfusion. CEUS is considered as a useful problem-solving tool and as an indicated first-line imaging modality in select settings. CEUS technique has an inherent advantage over its predecessor B-mode and Doppler imaging. This article reviews different approved and off-label use of CEUS in the pediatric and adult population and also discusses Food and Drug Administration-approved contrast agents in the United States, their reported side effects, and ongoing efforts in the field.

Evaluation of Renal Masses Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Sonovue and Sonazoid

OBJECTIVE

To explore the differences between SonoVue and Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluating enhancement features of renal masses and determine the diagnostic value of CEUS in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

METHODS

A total of 57 eligible patients were enrolled and divided into the ccRCC, papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), non-ccRCC and non-pRCC malignancy groups, and benign mass groups based on their postsurgical histopathologic diagnosis. The enhancement features of renal masses following SonoVue and Sonazoid CEUS in each group were analyzed. Diagnostic efficiencies of SonoVue and Sonazoid CEUS for ccRCC and non-ccRCC were determined.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the enhancement features of renal masses with SonoVue and Sonazoid imaging in the four groups (p > .05). Both SonoVue CEUS and Sonazoid CEUS showed good diagnostic performance for the differential diagnosis of ccRCC and non-ccRCC, with sensitivities of 88.6% and 85.7%, specificities of 76.5% and 88.2%, accuracies of 84.6% and 86.5%, positive predictive values of 88.6% and 93.8%, and negative predictive values of 76.5% and 75%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the diagnostic performance indices between the two methods (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

The CEUS features of SonoVue and Sonazoid in evaluating renal masses were similar in the vascular phase. Both SonoVue and Sonazoid CEUS showed good diagnostic performance for the differential diagnosis of ccRCC and non-ccRCC.

Diagnostic value of imaging in patients with clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: A case series and literature review

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC) is a newly classified renal cell carcinoma with a low degree of malignancy. Its imaging features have not been studied deeply. Therefore, we reviewed the imaging features of CCPRCC. Solid CCPRCC shows high echo or isoecho mass on conventional ultrasound. Contrast enhanced ultrasound shows "fast forward and slow backward, uneven high enhancement". Computed tomography shows high enhancement and maximum enhancement in the cortical-medullary phase. Magnetic resonance imaging shows slightly low T1WI and high T2WI. This article aims to improve the understanding of CCPRCC by clinical radiologists and promote the accurate.

Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound With the Enhancement Pattern and Qualitative Analysis for Differentiating Hypovascular Solid Renal Lesions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work described here was to explore the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with the enhancement pattern and qualitative analysis in distinguishing different types of hypovascular solid renal lesions.

METHODS

A total of 140 patients with 140 renal tumors (all diagnosed by pathology), which manifested hypo-enhancement on CEUS, were included in this study. We compared conventional ultrasound (US) and CEUS features in five common hypovascular renal tumors, including renal angiomyolipoma (RAML), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma (RPUC), papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). The diagnostic value of conventional US and qualitative parameters of CEUS for differentiating hypovascular solid renal lesions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients with a benign renal lesion was younger than that of patients with a malignant renal lesion (p < 0.05). Echogenicity and qualitative parameters such as wash-out, perfusion defects and perilesional rim-like enhancement (PRE) in the two groups differed significantly (all p values <0.05). Benign renal lesions exhibited mainly slow wash-out, whereas malignant renal lesions exhibited predominantly fast wash-out on CEUS (p < 0.05). There were significant differences in echogenicity, such as between RAML and ccRCC, between RAML and RPUC and between RAML and pRCC (all p values <0.05). The rates of appearance of perfusion defect in ccRCC (48%, 13/27) and pRCC (53%, 10/19) were significantly higher than the rate in RAML (14%, 6/43) (p < 0.05). The rates of appearance of PRE in ccRCC (15%, 4/27), pRCC (26%, 5/19) and chRCC (24%,4/17) were significantly higher than the rate in RAML (9%, 4/43) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CEUS with the enhancement pattern and qualitative analysis may be helpful in distinguishing malignant from benign hypovascular renal lesions.

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features for WHO/ISUP Grading in Renal Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

By analyzing the differences of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features between low- and high-grade of WHO/ISUP grading, to explore the diagnostic value of CEUS in evaluating the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

The qualitative and quantitative features of CEUS in 69 patients with RCC confirmed by surgical pathology in the Lanzhou University Second Hospital from March to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups: low-grade group (n = 22) and high-grade group (n = 47), with surgical pathology as reference standard. The diagnostic performance of statistically significant CEUS features was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in enhancement degree (P = .032) and quantitative features such as slope_lesion (P = .034), the differences between lesion and cortex in arrive time (∆AT = AT_lesion  - AT_cortex , P = .013), peak intensity(∆PI = [PI_lesion  - PI_cortex ]/PI_cortex , P = .003), area under the curve (∆Area = Area_lesion  - Area_cortex , P = .008) in two groups, and the sensitivity was 70.2% and specificity was 71.4% of ∆PI, which has a high diagnostic performance in the differentiation of low-grade group from high-grade group (P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS features such as ∆PI, may help differentiate low-grade RCC from high-grade RCC. CEUS has a promising application prospect in preoperative evaluation of the prognosis of RCC.

Comparative diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with that of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for the differential diagnosis of clear and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, as confirmed by subsequent pathology.

METHODS

A total of 181 patients with 184 renal lesions diagnosed by both CEUS and DCE-MRI were enrolled in the study, including 136 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and 48 non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) tumors. All lesions were confirmed by histopathologic diagnosis after surgical resection. Interobserver agreement was estimated using a weighted kappa statistic. Diagnostic efficiency in evaluating ccRCC and non-ccRCC was compared between CEUS and DCE-MRI.

RESULTS

The weighted kappa value for interobserver agreement was 0.746 to 0.884 for CEUS diagnosis and 0.764 to 0.895 for DCE-MRI diagnosis. Good diagnostic performance in differential diagnosis of ccRCC and non-ccRCC was displayed by both CEUS and DCE-MRI: sensitivity was 89.7% and 91.9%, respectively; specificity was 77.1% and 68.8%, respectively; and area under the receiver operating curve was 0.834 and 0.803, respectively. No statistically significant differences were present between the two methods (p = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Both CEUS and DCE-MRI imaging are effective for the differential diagnosis of ccRCC and non-ccRCC. Thus, CEUS could be an alternative to DCE-MRI as a first test for patients at risk of renal cancer, particularly where DCE-MRI cannot be carried out.

KEY POINTS

• CEUS and DCE-MRI features can help differentiate ccRCC and non-ccRCC. • The differential diagnosis of ccRCC and non-ccRCC by CEUS is comparable to that of DCE-MRI. • Interobserver agreement is generally high using CEUS and DCE-MRI.

Imaging Findings of a Renomedullary Interstitial Cell Tumor: A Case Report

Introduction: Renomedullary interstitial cell tumors are benign tumors of renal medulla. They are usually asymptomatic, and preoperative diagnosis based on radiological findings is challenging. Therefore, in most clinical situations, nephrectomy is ultimately performed for differential diagnosis. Case Presentation: A 54-year-old woman presented to our hospital with hematuria. An incidental mass in the left kidney was detected on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan. The mass showed iso-attenuation to renal parenchyma in the pre-contrast image and hypo-attenuation in the portal venous phase; however, some enhancement was observed in the central portion of the mass. Based on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) after one year, a slight septum-like enhancement was observed in the central portion of the mass in the venous phase. In dynamic contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI), the mass showed a low signal intensity, and delayed persistent enhancement was observed in 10- and 15-minute delayed phases. The mass was finally diagnosed as a renomedullary interstitial cell tumor. Conclusion: The imaging findings of renomedullary interstitial tumors included a low-signal-intensity mass of renal medulla on T1- and T2-weighted MRI and delayed enhancement on CEUS and dynamic MRI.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features of Adult Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: Differential Diagnosis With Three Main Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the sonographic features in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) using both conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and evaluate the usefulness of sonographic imaging characteristics to differentiate between Xp11.2 tRCC and the three common RCC subtypes.

METHODS

Thirty-four adult Xp11.2 tRCC patients who preoperatively underwent both conventional US and CEUS and had solitary renal lesions and pathological confirmation after surgery were enrolled. Control matched patients included 131 with clear cell RCC (ccRCC), 48 with papillary RCC (pRCC), and 35 with chromophobe RCC (chRCC). Conventional US and CEUS data of all patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Xp11.2 tRCC was more common in young women. The echogenicity of Xp11.2 tRCC lesions was hypo- and isoechoic relative to the adjacent renal cortex. A higher frequency of calcification within tumors was detected in Xp11.2 tRCC, but the presence of color flow signal (26.5%, 9/34) was much lower. Regarding CEUS features relative to the adjacent renal cortex, synchronous wash-in (61.8%, 21/34), iso-enhancement at peak (55.9%, 19/34), and fast wash-out (50.0%, 17/34) were more common in Xp11.2 tRCC. Moreover, an integrated variables model based on these features could differentiate Xp11.2 tRCC from ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC (area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity: 0.934, 92.0%, and 86.0%; 0.907, 88.0%, and 87.0%; and 0.808, 65.0%, and 99.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining conventional US and CEUS lesion features with clinical information may provide a feasible and effective method to differentiate Xp11.2 tRCC from ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC.

Long Non-Coding RNAs as Novel Biomarkers in the Clinical Management of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Promise or a Pledge?

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) represents the second most common subtype of renal cell carcinoma, following clear cell carcinoma and accounting for 10-15% of cases. For around 20 years, pRCCs have been classified according to their mere histopathologic appearance, unsupported by genetic and molecular evidence, with an unmet need for clinically relevant classification. Moreover, patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas have been seldom included in large clinical trials; therefore, the therapeutic landscape is less defined than in the clear cell subtype. However, in the last decades, the evolving comprehension of pRCC molecular features has led to a growing use of target therapy and to better oncological outcomes. Nonetheless, a reliable molecular biomarker able to detect the aggressiveness of pRCC is not yet available in clinical practice. As a result, the pRCC correct prognosis remains cumbersome, and new biomarkers able to stratify patients upon risk of recurrence are strongly needed. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are functional elements which play critical roles in gene expression, at the epigenetic, transcriptional, and post-transcriptional levels. In the last decade, ncRNAs have gained importance as possible biomarkers for several types of diseases, especially in the cancer universe. In this review, we analyzed the role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the prognosis of pRCC, with a particular focus on their networking. In fact, in the competing endogenous RNA hypothesis, lncRNAs can bind miRNAs, resulting in the modulation of the mRNA levels targeted by the sponged miRNA, leading to additional regulation of the target gene expression and increasing complexity in the biological processes.

Expanding the Role of Ultrasound for the Characterization of Renal Masses

The incidental detection of renal masses has been steadily rising. As a significant proportion of renal masses that are surgically treated are benign or indolent in nature, there is a clear need for better presurgical characterization of renal masses to minimize unnecessary harm. Ultrasound is a widely available and relatively inexpensive real-time imaging technique, and novel ultrasound-based applications can potentially aid in the non-invasive characterization of renal masses. Evidence acquisition: We performed a narrative review on novel ultrasound-based techniques that can aid in the non-invasive characterization of renal masses. Evidence synthesis: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) adds significant diagnostic value, particularly for cystic renal masses, by improving the characterization of fine septations and small nodules, with a sensitivity and specificity comparable to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, the performance of CEUS for the classification of benign versus malignant renal masses is comparable to that of computed tomography (CT) and MRI, although the imaging features of different tumor subtypes overlap significantly. Ultrasound molecular imaging with targeted contrast agents is being investigated in preclinical research as an addition to CEUS. Elastography for the assessment of tissue stiffness and micro-Doppler imaging for the improved detection of intratumoral blood flow without the need for contrast are both being investigated for the characterization of renal masses, though few studies have been conducted and validation is lacking. Conclusions: Several novel ultrasound-based techniques have been investigated for the non-invasive characterization of renal masses. CEUS has several advantages over traditional grayscale ultrasound, including the improved characterization of cystic renal masses and the potential to differentiate benign from malignant renal masses to some extent. Ultrasound molecular imaging offers promise for serial disease monitoring and the longitudinal assessment of treatment response, though this remains in the preclinical stages of development. While elastography and emerging micro-Doppler techniques have shown some encouraging applications, they are currently not ready for widespread clinical use.

Metanephric adenoma: association between the imaging features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinicopathological characteristics

Background

This study aimed to improve the understanding of metanephric adenoma (MA) by retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings and clinicopathological characteristics of MAs.

Methods

Gray-scale ultrasound (US) and CEUS findings of 7 adult MA patients, confirmed by postoperative pathology, were summarized via collection of clinicopathological and ultrasonographic imaging data, including tumor location, size, echo intensity, color flow, presence or absence of calcification, and liquefactive necrosis, contrast-enhanced pattern, enhancement characteristics, and contrast wash-out compared with adjacent parenchyma, and the presence or absence of a pseudocapsule. Histopathological analyses, including hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, were conducted with the EnVision method.

Results

All 7 participants were female, aged 29-73 years (mean age, 54 years), with flank pain (3/7). All tumors were solid (7/7) with sizes of 2.0-5.0 cm (mean diameter, 3.07 cm), including 4 in the left kidney, 3 in the right kidney, 2 in the renal pelvis, and 5 in the renal parenchyma. On the gray-scale US, MA was shown as hypoechoic (4/7), slightly hyperechoic (2/7), isoechoic (1/7), and with a defined border. The morphology was regular and rounded (7/7), internal echogenicity was homogeneous (5/7), and no calcification was seen (7/7). The CEUS showed clear boundaries (7/7), homogeneous isodensity (5/7), with calcification (0/7), necrosis (2/11), heterogeneous hyperattenuation (2/7), pseudocapsule (2/7), and medullary phase fast wash-out (7/7). The surgical methods were radical nephrectomy (4/7) and partial nephrectomy (3/7). The duration of follow-up period for all participants was 3-74 months, and no local or distant recurrences were found. The IHC staining showed that most tumor cells were positive for WT1, cytokeratins AE1/AE3, vimentin, and CD57, and exhibited focal positivity for CK7, while negative for CD10, AMACR, and CK720. The proliferative index (Ki-67) was 2-3%.

Conclusions

On gray-scale US, MA appears as a solid nodule with a well-defined boundary, regular morphology, and homogeneous echogenicity; CEUS shows slow progression and slightly lower homogeneous enhancement and fast wash-out in the medullary phase. These findings may provide insight into the progression of MA and aid in the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma: Review

Kidney cancer is the 13th most common malignancy globally, and the incidence is rising. Papillary renal cell carcinoma is the second most common subtype, comprising 10-15% of renal cell carcinomas. Though the histologic features of this subtype were initially described in the 1990's, our understanding of the genetic and molecular characteristics of this disease have rapidly evolved over the past decade. In this review, we summarize the contemporary understanding of the clinical, morphologic, radiographic, and genetic characteristics of papillary renal cell carcinoma, as well as clinical considerations, current options for management, and prognosis.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging for active surveillance of small renal masses

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging for monitoring small (< 4 cm) renal masses (SRM) in patients undergoing active surveillance (AS).

METHODS

We retrospectively selected all consecutive patients with SRMs who underwent AS for at least 6 months at our Institution between January 2014 and December 2018. CEUS imaging was performed by two experienced genitourinary radiologists at established time points. The accuracy of CEUS for monitoring SRM size was compared with that of CT scan. For solid SRMs, four enhancement patterns (EP) were recorded. Radiological progression was defined as SRM growth rate ≥ 5 mm/year.

RESULTS

Overall, 158/1049 (15.1%) patients with SRMs underwent AS. At a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 13-39), no patient died due to renal cell carcinoma (RCC). No patients experienced CEUS-related adverse events. There was a large variability in the pattern of growth of SRMs (overall median growth rate: 0.40 mm/year), with 9.5% of SRMs showing radiological progression. The median SRM size was comparable between CEUS and CT scan examinations at all time points. The vast majority (92.7%) of SRMs did not show a change in their EP over time; and there was no association between the SRM's EP and radiological progression or SRM size. Overall, 43 (27.2%) patients underwent delayed intervention (DI); median SRM size, and median growth rate were significantly higher in these patients as compared to those continuing AS.

CONCLUSION

In experienced hands, CEUS is a safe and effective strategy for active monitoring of SRMs in well-selected patients undergoing AS.

Routine or enhanced imaging to differentiate between type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma

AIM

To investigate imaging features and differentiating qualities of type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) by different imaging techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2007 to 2019, 107 patients with type 1 pRCC (T1-pRCC) and 147 with type 2 pRCC (T2-pRCC) were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent conventional ultrasound (US); some also underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI). Tumour Fuhrman grade or World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade (after June 2016) and invasive ranges were recorded. The two types of pRCC were analysed and compared for imaging features including tumour position, size, margin, echo type, and colour Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) using US as well as enhanced features from CEUS, CECT, or CE-MRI.

RESULTS

T2-pRCC showed a higher Fuhrman grade (p<0.001) and greater propensity to invade extrarenal tissue (p<0.001) than T1-pRCC. On US imaging, T2-pRCC was more likely to be a cystic-solid lesion (p<0.001), and colour flow with a higher resistance index (RI; p=0.014) was more easily detected (p=0.001) in T2-pRCC than in T1-pRCC. Within contrast-enhanced examinations, more T2-pRCC lesions had blurred tumour borders (p=0.003), hypervascular characteristics (p=0.003), and heterogeneous enhancement (p<0.001) than those of T1-pRCC.

CONCLUSIONS

T2-pRCC manifests more aggressively than T1-pRCC. T2-pRCC has a higher proportion of hypervascular and heterogeneous enhancement than T1-RCC.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of adult renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion: comparison with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To investigate the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion (Xp11.2/TFE3) in adult patients by comparison with those of clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and papillary RCC (pRCC).

METHODS

In total, 110 patients (110 renal masses) who underwent CEUS examinations were enrolled in this study. The cases included 18 Xp11.2/TFE3 RCCs, 60 ccRCCs and 32 pRCCs. All masses were confirmed by operative pathology. The CEUS imaging data of these patients were retrospectively analysed by two readers. The conventional US and CEUS features of Xp11.2/TFE3 RCC were compared with those of ccRCC and pRCC.

RESULTS

The age of the patients with Xp11.2/TFE3 RCC ranged from 20 to 68 years, with a mean age of 38.3 ± 16.3 years and a slight female predominance. The weighted kappa value that interprets the concordance between the interobserver agreement of the US and CEUS features ranged from 0.61 to 0.89. On conventional US and CEUS imaging of Xp11.2/TFE3 RCCs, the tumours were hypoechoic (6/18, 33.3%), isoechoic (8/18, 44.4%), and hyperechoic (4/18, 22.2%). The cystic component was present in 5 cases (27.8%), calcification was present in 9 cases (50.0%), and colour flow signal was present in 7 cases (38.9%). Most cases showed simultaneous wash-in (11/18, 61.1%); the peak enhancement showed hypoenhancement (6/18, 33.3%), isoenhancement (10/18, 55.6%), and hyperenhancement (2/18, 11.1%); most cases exhibited heterogeneous enhancement (12/18, 66.7%) and fast- or simultaneous-out (16/18, 88.9%); and a pseudocapsule was present in 6 cases (33.3%). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, calcification and lower peak enhancement were more likely to be present in Xp11.2/TFE3 RCC than in ccRCC (P < 0.05), and younger age and relatively high peak enhancement were more likely to be present in Xp11.2/TFE3 RCC than in pRCC (P < 0.05). The calcification combined peak enhancement model differentiated Xp11.2/TFE3 RCC from ccRCC, and the age combined peak enhancement model differentiated Xp11.2/TFE3 RCC from pRCC with an AUC, a sensitivity and a specificity of 0.896, 94.4% and 73.3% and 0.786, 50.0% and 100.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The specific CEUS features combined with demographic information and clinical symptoms may be helpful for differentiating Xp11.2/TFE3 RCC from ccRCC and pRCC.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound: A review of radiology applications

Ultrasound contrast agents have been used for decades in Europe and Asia for cardiac and abdominal imaging and are now being more commonly utilized in the United States for radiology applications. Our article reviews the basics of contrast-enhanced ultrasound including how the contrast agent works, advantages and disadvantages, as well as pearls and pitfalls to help the radiologist efficiently integrate this technology into day-to-day clinical practice. We also discuss the diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions as well as off-label applications such as evaluation of renal masses.

Current management of small renal masses

One of the consequences of the growing use of diagnostic imaging techniques is the notable growth in the detection of small renal masses presumably corresponding to localized tumors that are potentially curable with surgical treatment. When faced with the finding of a small renal mass, radiologists must determine whether it is benign or malignant, and if it is malignant, what subtype it belong to, and whether it should be managed with surgical treatment, with ablative techniques, or with watchful waiting with active surveillance. Small renal masses are now a clinical entity that require management different from the approaches used for classical renal cell carcinomas. In this scenario, radiologists are key because they are involved in all aspects of the management of these tumors, including in their diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

Needle track seeding in renal mass biopsies

A review and analysis of the literature demonstrates that needle track seeding in renal mass biopsy has been reported 16 times. This complication occurs almost exclusively among patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. The incidence is associated with multiple punctures of the mass, the use of core needles of ≥20 gauge, and lack of a coaxial sheath. Needle tract seeding may be associated with tumor upstaging and a worse prognosis. Fine-needle aspiration has a significantly lower rate of needle track seeding compared with large core needle biopsy (>20-gauge needle). A more formalized risk-based system for interpreting renal mass fine-needle aspiration may be useful as clinicians choose among an increasing number of therapeutic options.

Diagnostic Value of Transthoracic Echocardiography Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Mediastinal Masses

OBJECTIVES

Multiple types of mediastinal masses, especially masses in the anterior mediastinum, may be encountered in routine echocardiographic examinations for symptomatic or asymptomatic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of transthoracic echocardiography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in determining the location, composition, and vascularization of mediastinal masses.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 48 consecutive patients who first had a diagnosis of mediastinal masses by echocardiography. The location of the mass, tissue components, and relationships with the heart and great vessels were analyzed on the basis of multiple transthoracic echocardiographic views. Further contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed to determine the vascularization of masses in 25 patients. The clinical, computed tomographic, and histopathologic findings were all recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The localization, ultrasonographic characteristics of the mass, degree of vascularization, and relationships with the heart and great vessels assessed on echocardiography allowed a correct diagnosis in most of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Transthoracic echocardiography is a useful method for diagnosing mediastinal. Further contrast-enhanced ultrasonography could provide more details on the degree of vascularization, which could facilitate accurate diagnosis and differentiation diagnosis.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the therapeutic assessment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A case report

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) has been extensively used in the restaging and assessment of treatment response for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, CECT does not provide information regarding the specific functionality of lesions. A patient (56 years old, female) was previously admitted to the present institution, with bilateral cervical masses. Following numerous cycles of chemotherapy, a stable disease status was confirmed using CECT. In conjunction with CECT imaging results, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) demonstrated important semi-functional information regarding blood perfusion, during the revision of treatment assessment. ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging demonstrated no increase in FDG uptake of the same tumor lesion, consistent with the results of CEUS. CEUS exhibited the potential to present complementary results to CECT, in the therapeutic assessment of DLBCL, which, to the best of our knowledge, has not previously been reported.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the evaluation of benign and malignant small renal masses (SRMs) (<4 cm) confirmed by pathology.

METHODS

A total of 118 patients with 118 renal masses smaller than 4 cm diagnosed by both CEUS and CECT were enrolled in this study, including 25 benign lesions and 93 malignant lesions. All lesions were confirmed by histopathologic diagnosis after surgical resection. The diagnostic imaging studies of the patients were retrospectively reviewed by two independent ultrasonologists and two independent radiologists blinded to the CT or ultrasound findings and final histological results. All lesions on both CEUS and CECT were independently scored on a 3-point scale (1: benign, 2: equivocal, and 3: malignant). The concordance between interobserver agreement was interpreted using a weighted kappa statistic. The diagnostic efficiency of the evaluation of benign and malignant lesions was compared between CEUS and CECT.

RESULTS

All the 118 included lesions were detected by both CEUS and CECT. In CEUS and CECT imaging evaluation of the 118 lesions, the weighted kappa value interpreting the concordance between interobserver agreement was 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.98) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99), respectively. Both CEUS and CECT demonstrated good diagnostic performance in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SRMs with sensitivity of 93.5% and 89.2%, specificity of 68% and 76%, PPV of 91.6% and 93.3%, NPV of 73.9% and 65.5%, and AUC of 0.808 and 0.826, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the diagnostic performance indices between these two methods (P > 0.05). However, the qualitative diagnosis of small papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by CEUS was significantly better than that by CECT (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in qualitative diagnostic accuracy on other histotypes of SRMs between CEUS and CECT (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both CEUS and CECT imaging modalities are effective for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SRMs. Furthermore, CEUS may be more effective than CECT for the qualitative diagnosis of small papillary RCC.

How to Develop a Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Program

With the recent Food and Drug Administration approval of Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microsphere, Bracco Diagnostics Inc, Monroe Township, NJ) for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to characterize focal liver lesions in both adult and pediatric patients, widespread use of CEUS is expected in the United States. This paper provides guidance in setting up a CEUS program, and reviews the practical details that will need to be instituted in a standard ultrasound department to provide both safe and efficient use of CEUS. A review of the indications, contraindications, adverse events, instructions for performing the exam, and image interpretation are discussed.

A Pilot Clinical Study in Characterization of Malignant Renal-cell Carcinoma Subtype with Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound

Malignant renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a diverse set of diseases, which are independently difficult to characterize using conventional MRI and CT protocols due to low temporal resolution to study perfusion characteristics. Because different disease subtypes have different prognoses and involve varying treatment regimens, the ability to determine RCC subtype non-invasively is a clinical need. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been assessed as a tool to characterize kidney lesions based on qualitative and quantitative assessment of perfusion patterns, and we hypothesize that this technique might help differentiate disease subtypes. Twelve patients with RCC confirmed pathologically were imaged using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Time intensity curves were generated and analyzed quantitatively using 10 characteristic metrics. Results showed that peak intensity ( p = 0.001) and time-to-80% on wash-out ( p = 0.004) provided significant differences between clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe RCC subtypes. These results suggest that CEUS may be a feasible test for characterizing RCC subtypes.

The radiologist's role in the management of papillary renal cell carcinoma

Papillary carcinoma is the second most common renal cell carcinoma. It has a better prognosis than the more frequent clear cell carcinoma, although this does not hold true for advanced cases, because no specific treatment exists. It presents as a circumscribed peripheral tumor (small and homogeneously solid or larger and cystic/hemorrhagic) or as an infiltrating lesion that invades the veins, which has a worse prognosis. Due to their low vascular density, papillary renal cell carcinomas enhance less than other renal tumors, and this facilitates their characterization. On computed tomography, they might not enhance conclusively, and in these cases they are impossible to distinguish from hyperattenuating cysts. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are more sensitive for detecting vascularization. Other characteristics include a specific vascular pattern, hypointensity on T2-weighted images, restricted water diffusion, and increased signal intensity in opposed phase images. We discuss the genetic, histologic, clinical, and radiological aspects of these tumors in which radiologists play a fundamental role in management.