Strain of ascending aorta on cardiac magnetic resonance in 1027 patients: Relation with age, gender, and cardiovascular disease

Cross-Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community

Background Stiffness of the proximal aorta may play a critical role in adverse left ventricular (LV)-vascular interactions and associated LV diastolic dysfunction. In a community-based sample, we sought to determine the association between proximal aortic stiffness measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and several clinical measures of LV diastolic mechanics. Methods and Results Framingham Heart Study Offspring adults (n=1502 participants, mean 67±9 years, 54% women) with available 1.5T CMR and transthoracic echocardiographic measures were included. Measures included proximal descending aortic strain and aortic arch pulse wave velocity by CMR (2002-2006) and diastolic function (mitral Doppler E and A wave velocity, E wave area, and LV tissue Doppler e' velocity) by echocardiography (2005-2008). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to relate CMR aortic stiffness measures to measures of echocardiographic LV diastolic function. All continuous variables were standardized. In multivariable-adjusted regression analyses, aortic strain was inversely associated with E wave deceleration time (estimated β=-0.10±0.032, P=0.001), whereas aortic arch pulse wave velocity was inversely associated with E/A ratio (estimated β=-0.094±0.027, P=0.0006), E wave area (estimated β=-0.070±0.027, P=0.010), and e' (estimated β=-0.061±0.027, P=0.022), all indicating associations of higher aortic stiffness by CMR with less favorable LV diastolic function. Compared with men, women had a larger inverse relationship between pulse wave velocity and E/A ratio (interaction β=-0.085±0.031, P=0.0064). There was no significant effect modification by age or a U-shaped (quadratic) relation between aortic stiffness and LV diastolic function measures. Conclusions Higher proximal aortic stiffness is associated with less favorable LV diastolic function. Future studies may clarify temporal relations of aortic stiffness with varying patterns and progression of LV diastolic dysfunction.

The association between cardiac magnetic resonance-derived aortic stiffness parameters and aortic dilation in young adults with bicuspid aortic valve: With and without coarctation of aorta

Background

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with progressive aortic dilation. Studies in aortopathies have shown a correlation between increased aortic stiffness and aortic dilation. We aimed to evaluate aortic stiffness measures as predictors of progressive aortic dilation by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in BAV patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 49 patients with BAV (median age 21.1 years at first CMR visit) with ≥2 CMR at the Wisconsin Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program (WAtCH). Circumferential aortic strain, distensibility, and β-stiffness index were obtained from CMR-derived aortic root cine imaging, and aortic dimensions were measured at aortic root and ascending aorta. A linear mixed-model and logistic regression were used to identify important predictors of progressive aortic dilation.

Results

Over a median of 3.8 years follow-up, the annual growth rates of aortic root and ascending aorta dimensions were 0.25 and 0.16 mm/year, respectively. Aortic strain and distensibility decreased while β-stiffness index increased with age. Aortic root strain and distensibility were associated with progressive dilation of the ascending aorta. Baseline aortic root diameter was an independent predictor of >1 mm/year growth rate of the aortic root (adjusted OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.03-1.74, p = 0.028). Most patients (61 %) had coexisting coarctation of aorta. Despite the higher prevalence of hypertension in patients with aortic coarctation, hypertension or coarctation had no effect on baseline aorta dimensions, stiffness, or progressive aortic dilation.

Conclusion

Some CMR-derived aortic stiffness parameters correlated with progressive aortic dilation in BAV and should be further investigated in larger and older BAV cohorts.

The Potential for Quantifying Regional Distributions of Radial and Shear Strain in the Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Wall Using Spiral Cine DENSE Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Aortic displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was recently developed to assess heterogeneities in aortic wall circumferential strain (CS). However, previous studies neglected potential radial and shear strain (RSS) distributions. Herein, we present an improved aortic DENSE MRI postprocessing method to assess the feasibility of quantifying all components of the two-dimensional (2D) strain tensor. 32 previously acquired 2D DENSE scans from three distinct aortic locations were re-analyzed. Contrasting previous studies, displacements of the inner and outer aortic wall layers were processed separately to preserve RSS. Differences in regional strain between the new and old postprocessing methods were evaluated, along with interobserver, intraobserver, and interscan repeatability for all strain components. The new postprocessing method revealed an overall mean absolute difference in regional CS of 0.01 ± 0.01 compared to the prior method, with minimal impact on CS repeatability. Mean absolute magnitudes of regional RSS increased significantly compared to changes in CS (radial 0.04 ± 0.05, p < 0.001; shear 0.04 ± 0.04, p = 0.02). Most repeatability metrics for RSS were significantly worse than for CS. The unique distributions of RSS for each axial location associated well with local periaortic structures and mean aortic displacement. The new postprocessing method captures heterogeneous distributions of nonzero RSS which may provide new information for improving clinical diagnostics and computational modeling of heterogeneous aortic wall mechanics. However, future studies are required to improve the repeatability of RSS and assess the influence of partial volume effects.

Descending aortic strain quantification by intra-operative transesophageal echocardiography: Multimodality validation via cardiovascular magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Whereas cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides high temporal resolution imaging of aortic distensibility (strain), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is widely used for intra-operative aortic imaging and provides a clinical alternative for aortic assessment. We tested intra-operative global circumferential aortic strain (GCS) measured on TEE in relation to the reference of CMR-derived strain among patients undergoing surgical graft repair of ascending aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

CMR (3T) was prospectively performed in patients scheduled for aortic repair. TEE was performed intra-operatively; images were co-localized with MRI. GCS on CMR and TEE was quantified independently, blinded to results of the other modality.

RESULTS

25 patients (54 ± 10 year-old, 88% male) were studied, inclusive of 13 genetically mediated and 12 degenerative aneurysms: CMR and TEE were performed within 12 ± 9 days. Pulse pressure (PP)-adjusted descending aortic TEE-derived GCS strongly correlated with cine-CMR-derived GCS (r = .75, P = .002) though absolute GCS and PP-adjusted values were slightly lower (5.40 ± 1.11 vs 6.49 ± 1.43% and 11.55 ± 3.04 vs 13.99 ± 4.53%, respectively). Similarly, TEE yielded slightly lower end-diastolic area (EDA [5.1 ± 1.7 cm² vs 5.8 ± 1.3 cm² , P = .004]) and end-systolic area (ESA [6.1 ± 1.9 cm² vs 6.5 ± 1.7 cm² , P = .10]), with significant correlations between the two modalities (r = .73, .76, P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study supports feasibility of TEE for assessing aortic GCS in a surgical at-risk population, as well as magnitude of agreement between intra-operative TEE and preoperative CMR. We found that there is a significant correlation between GCS and EDA and ESA aortic areas, but that TEE-derived parameters underestimated CMR values by a small but significant amount.