Impaired Distensibility of the Proximal Aorta in Fetuses With Tetralogy of Fallot

Background Increased aortic wall stiffness, which even persists after repair, has been reported in patients with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). We aimed to observe the distensibility of the ascending aorta and descending aorta in fetuses with TOF and explore its relation with aortic blood flow volume and aortic and pulmonary annular size. Methods and Results Twenty-three fetuses with TOF and 23 gestational age-matched normal fetuses were included in this prospective cross-sectional study. The distensibilities of the ascending aorta and descending aorta were assessed by aortic strain (AS), which was defined as follows: 100×(maximum internal diameter in the systolic phase-minimum internal diameter in the diastolic phase)/minimum internal diameter in the diastolic phase. The maximum internal diameter in the systolic phase and minimum internal diameter in the diastolic phase of the ascending aorta and descending aorta were measured by M-mode echocardiography. Associations between AS and aortic blood flow volume and aortic and pulmonary valve diameters were assessed in both groups. AS of the ascending aorta in TOF group was lower than that in controls (20.48%±4.19% versus 28.17%±4.54%; P<0.001), whereas there was no significant difference in the descending aorta. The multivariate regression model demonstrated that AS was significantly related to aortic valve size (P=0.014) and aortic blood flow volume (P=0.022) in fetuses with TOF, whereas only aortic blood flow volume was significantly correlated with AS in the control group (P=0.01). No significant association was found between AS and pulmonary valve size. Conclusions Impaired distensibility of proximal aorta was observed in fetuses with TOF. Both intrinsic abnormalities of the aortic wall and aortic volume overload probably play roles in the altered aortic distensibility.

Thickness and Volume of Epicardial Adipose Tissue in Relation to Stiffness and Elasticity of Aorta Assessed by Computed Tomography Angiography

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess the importance of the measurements of thickness and volume of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as a predictive factor of increased stiffness and impaired elasticity of aorta.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study involved a group of 97 patients (63.48 ± 8.50 years). In accordance with the medians of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) parameters, aortic elasticity and stiffness parameters, patients were divided into subgroups: EAT thickness median 9.40 mm, EAT volume median 61.95 mL, EAT thickness index 5.08 mm/m² and EAT volume index 34.33 mL/m².

RESULTS

The mean coronary artery calcium score was 162.24 (±317.69). The mean aortic stiffness index was 4.18 (±0.81). The assessed mean aortic elasticity parameters were 3.29% (±2.37) and 0.12 cm²/dyn (±0.09) for strain and distensibility, respectively. A positive linear correlation was observed between EAT parameters and aortic stiffness (0.21), volume (0.51), thickness index (0.24), volume index (0.55) and, for aorta elasticity, a negative linear correlation between the following EAT parameters was observed: thickness (-0.32 and -0.30), volume (-0.49 and -0.48), thickness index (-0.34 and -0.31), volume index (-0.51 and -0.49) and aortic elasticity parameters (aorta strain and aorta distensibility, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The study showed that CCTA illustrates a relationship between the parameters of EAT and an increased stiffness of the aorta, while the most predictive factor of stiffness was the volume index.

Cross-Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community

Background Stiffness of the proximal aorta may play a critical role in adverse left ventricular (LV)-vascular interactions and associated LV diastolic dysfunction. In a community-based sample, we sought to determine the association between proximal aortic stiffness measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and several clinical measures of LV diastolic mechanics. Methods and Results Framingham Heart Study Offspring adults (n=1502 participants, mean 67±9 years, 54% women) with available 1.5T CMR and transthoracic echocardiographic measures were included. Measures included proximal descending aortic strain and aortic arch pulse wave velocity by CMR (2002-2006) and diastolic function (mitral Doppler E and A wave velocity, E wave area, and LV tissue Doppler e' velocity) by echocardiography (2005-2008). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to relate CMR aortic stiffness measures to measures of echocardiographic LV diastolic function. All continuous variables were standardized. In multivariable-adjusted regression analyses, aortic strain was inversely associated with E wave deceleration time (estimated β=-0.10±0.032, P=0.001), whereas aortic arch pulse wave velocity was inversely associated with E/A ratio (estimated β=-0.094±0.027, P=0.0006), E wave area (estimated β=-0.070±0.027, P=0.010), and e' (estimated β=-0.061±0.027, P=0.022), all indicating associations of higher aortic stiffness by CMR with less favorable LV diastolic function. Compared with men, women had a larger inverse relationship between pulse wave velocity and E/A ratio (interaction β=-0.085±0.031, P=0.0064). There was no significant effect modification by age or a U-shaped (quadratic) relation between aortic stiffness and LV diastolic function measures. Conclusions Higher proximal aortic stiffness is associated with less favorable LV diastolic function. Future studies may clarify temporal relations of aortic stiffness with varying patterns and progression of LV diastolic dysfunction.

Assessment of Aortic Stiffness by Transthoracic Echocardiographic in Young COVID-19 Patients

Background

Deteriorated aortic elasticity is part of the atherosclerotic process. Inflammation is an underlying factor in both COVID-19 and atherosclerosis.

Aims and Objectives

Using aortic elastic properties, we aimed to assess the subclinical indicators of susceptibility to inflammatory atherosclerosis in patients with COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

Out of 194 participants included in this study, 100 were diagnosed with COVID-19 in the last 6 months (60 women and 40 men with a mean age of 34.13 ± 6.45 years) and 94 were healthy controls (55 women and 39 men with a mean age of 30.39 ± 7.21 years). We analyzed transthoracic echocardiographic and aortic stiffness parameters in all participants.

Results

Values of systolic blood pressure (110 [85-140] vs. 110 [80-140], P = 0.037) and pulse pressure (PP) (37 [25-55] vs. 40 [25-55], P < 0.01) were significantly different between the groups. As for laboratory parameters, levels of glucose (97.89 ± 20.23 vs. 92.00 ± 9.95, P = 0.003) and creatinine (0.80 ± 0.13 vs. 0.75 ± 0.09, P = 0.003) were significantly higher in the COVID-19 group. Echocardiographic parameters showed that both groups differed significantly in diastolic aortic diameter (2.42 ± 0.28 vs. 2.31 ± 0.35, P = 0.017), aortic strain (9.66 [1.20-31.82] vs. 12.82 [2.41-40.11], P = 0.025), aortic distensibility (0.502 [0.049-2.545] vs. 0.780 [0.120-2.674], P < 0.01), and aortic stiffness (16.67 [4.19-139.43] vs. 11.71 [3.43-65.21], P = 0.006).

Conclusion

Measurement of aortic stiffness is a simple, practical yet inexpensive method in COVID-19 patients, and therefore, may be used as an early marker for COVID-19-induced subclinical atherosclerosis.

Differential Effects of Aortic Valve Replacement on Aortic Circumferential Strain in Aortic Stenosis and Aortic Insufficiency

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) potentially can modify pulse-wave propagation to the distal aorta. Echo-derived global circumferential strain (GCS) was used to test whether AVR for aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic insufficiency (AI) resulted in differential aortic biomechanics in the descending thoracic aorta.

DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study of patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2016 and 2019.

SETTING

Weill Cornell Medicine, a single large academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

The population comprised 48 patients undergoing AVR (62 ± 15 y/o, 79% male; 22 with AI and 26 with AS) and 11 patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery as controls.

INTERVENTIONS

Elective cardiac surgery, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), pulmonary artery catheter.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pre- and postprocedural TEEs were collected. Descending aorta short-axis images were analyzed for GCS, time-to-peak strain, aortic end-diastolic, end-systolic area, and fractional area changes. Pulse pressure (PP) and stroke volume were quantified. Preprocedural GCS significantly differed between patients with AI and AS, with AI patients having greater GCS (median/interquartile range, 9.6 95.3,13.6) than patients with AS (4.3 [3.4-5.1]). After AVR, in AI patients, strain significantly decreased (5.5 [3.8,8.2], p = 0.001), along with PP (mean ± standard deviation) (66.4 ± 0.8 to 54.1 ± 13.7, p < 0.001), and PP corrected strain did not (GCS/PP = 14.8 [6.9-19.9] v 12.7[8.2-18.6], p = 0.34). In AS patients, GCS significantly increased after AVR to (5.45 [4.2-6.8], p = 0.003), as did PP-corrected strain (6.9 [5.8-9.2] v 9.7 [6.5-13.4], p = 0.016). Surgical AVR produced decrements in time-to-peak strain in AI and AS groups (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After AVR for AI and AS, the direction of change in distal aortic strain from baseline depends on valve pathology. This finding may have important clinical implications in terms of indication for surgery and postoperative surveillance, especially in patients with aortopathies.

Comparison of aortic pressures and aortic elastic properties between patients with end-stage renal disease and healthy controls

Background

Current evidence indicates that vascular calcification plays an essential role in the development of cardiovascular diseases in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Arterial stiffness is a marker of increased cardiovascular risk in various populations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the elastic properties of ascending aorta in patients with ESRD.

Methods

This single-center study enrolled 96 patients (45 females, age: 57.2 ± 12.8 years) with ESRD and 96 healthy controls (52 females, age: 55.3 ± 10.1 years). Aortic pressures and aortic elastic parameters including aortic strain, aortic distensibility, aortic stiffness index, and aortic compliance were calculated using accepted formulae.

Results

The hemodynamic parameters including aortic pulse pressure, aortic mean pressure, aortic fractional pulse pressure, and aortic pulsatility index were significantly higher in patients with ESRD. Systolic and diastolic aortic diameters were similar between the groups. However, pulsatile aortic diameter change, aortic strain, aortic distensibility, and aortic compliance were significantly lower, whereas aortic stiffness index was significantly higher in ESRD group.

Conclusions

The results demonstrated that a significant difference was present in terms of aortic blood pressures between patients with ESRD and controls. In addition, the elastic properties of ascending aorta were decreased in patients with ESRD.

Elastic properties of ascending aorta in women with previous pregnancy complicated by early- or late-onset pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the elastic properties of the ascending aorta in women with a previous pregnancy complicated by early-onset (EO) or late-onset (LO) pre-eclampsia (PE) and the correlation with gestational age (GA), systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) and mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) at diagnosis of the disease as well as with birth weight of the neonate.

METHODS

Thirty women who had a previous pregnancy complicated by EO-PE, 30 with a previous pregnancy complicated by LO-PE and 30 normal controls were selected retrospectively from our electronic database and then recalled for assessment from 6 months to 4 years after delivery. Data regarding GA, SBP/DBP and mean UtA-PI at the diagnosis of PE were obtained from medical records. At our assessment, aortic M-mode and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) parameters were measured. Aortic diameters were assessed at end-diastole at four levels: Valsalva sinuses, sinotubular junction, tubular tract and aortic arch. Aortic compliance, distensibility, stiffness index (SI), Peterson's elastic modulus (EM), pulse-wave velocity and M-mode strain were calculated using standard formulae. Aortic expansion velocity, early and late diastolic retraction velocities and peak systolic tissue strain (TDI-ϵ) were determined.

RESULTS

Aortic diameters at the four levels were significantly greater in both EO-PE and LO-PE groups than in controls. Aortic compliance and distensibility and TDI-ϵ were lower in EO-PE than in LO-PE (P  = 0.001, P  = 0.002 and P  = 0.011, respectively) and controls (P  = 0.037, P  = 0.044 and P  = 0.013, respectively). SI and EM were higher in EO-PE than in LO-PE (P  = 0.001 and P  < 0.001, respectively) and than in controls (P = 0.035 and P  = 0.036, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed GA, DBP and UtA-PI at diagnosis of PE to be independent predictors of aortic elastic properties.

CONCLUSIONS

Elastic properties of the ascending aorta were altered in women with a previous pregnancy complicated by EO-PE, but not in those with LO-PE. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.