1
|
Kaidar-Person O, Faermann R, Polikar D, Cohen K, Bernstein-Molho R, Morrow M, Boersma LJ, Offersen BV, Poortmans P, Sklair-Levy M, Anaby D. A BRILLIANT-BRCA study: residual breast tissue after mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 208:359-367. [PMID: 38980506 PMCID: PMC11455724 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07425-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Different types of mastectomies leave different amounts of residual breast tissue. The significance of the residual breast volume (RBV) is not clear. Therefore, we developed an MRI tool that allows to easily assess the RBV. In this study we evaluated factors associated with RBV after skin or nipple sparing mastectomy (SSM/NSM) in breast cancer BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) carriers who underwent both therapeutic and risk reducing SSM/NSM and its relation to breast cancer outcomes using an innovative MRI-based tool. METHODS Data of breast cancer BRCA PV who were treated between 2006 and 2020 were retrieved from of the oncogenetics unit databases. Only patients who underwent SSM/NSM and had a postoperative breast MRI available for analysis were included. Data collected included demographics, clinicopathological features, and outcomes. The MRI tool was developed by a breast cancer imaging laboratory. A logistic regression test and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the associated risk of increased RBV. A forward stepwise linear regression was used to correlate tumour-patient specific factors and RBV, and a Kaplan-Meier curve to show the probability of locoregional relapse. RESULTS A total of 84 patients undergoing 89 mastectomies were included. At a median follow-up of 98 months, 5 local, 2 regional, and 4 distant recurrences were observed. RBV was not significantly related with breast cancer outcomes (p value = NS). A higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with a higher RBV (p < 0.0001). A larger number of involved axillary nodes was associated with a smaller RBV (p = 0.025). The RBV on the risk-reducing mastectomy side was significantly higher compared to the breast cancer side (p value = 0.007). Local recurrences occurred in the vicinity of the primary tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
- Breast Radiation Unit, The Jusidman Cancer Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Renata Faermann
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- The Merav High-Risk Clinic - Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Dor Polikar
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Kfir Cohen
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Rinat Bernstein-Molho
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- Breast Cancer Institute, The Jusidman Cancer Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
- Oncogenetics Unit, Institute of Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Liesbeth Jorinne Boersma
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Miri Sklair-Levy
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- The Merav High-Risk Clinic - Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Debbie Anaby
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Christine D, Christian SF, Ricarda K, Christine K, Daphne GK, Carmen L, Alaa M, Baltzer PAT, Thomas HH, Georg P, Paola C. Risk factors for residual fibroglandular breast tissue following a mastectomy - an overview and retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:856. [PMID: 39026150 PMCID: PMC11256640 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12491-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residual fibroglandular breast tissue (RFGT) following a mastectomy is associated with the remaining of occult breast cancer at the time of mastectomy as well as an increased local recurrence risk thereafter. Despite its oncologic implications, data on measures to prevent RFGT are lacking. Therefore, in a first step knowledge of risk factors for RFGT is of uttermost importance in order to allow identification of patients at risk and subsequently adaption of the surgical treatment and potentially prevention of RFGT a priori. METHODS We performed a systematic literature review in PubMed using the MESH terms [residual fibroglandular breast tissue], [residual breast tissue], [mastectomy] and [risk factor] followed by a retrospective data analysis including all patients with a mastectomy treated at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, between 01.01.2015 and 26.02.2020 in order to identify risk factors of RFGT following a mastectomy. The primary aim of the study was to assess a potential difference in RFGT volume between the different types of mastectomy. The secondary objectives of the study were to identify other potential risk factors for RFGT as well as to compare the skin and subcutaneous fat tissue thickness pre- to postoperatively. RESULTS Significantly higher RFGT volumes were observed following a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) compared to a skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and radical mastectomy (RME) (p < .001). Furthermore, RFGT volume was significantly associated with the variables: reconstruction (p = .012), acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or mesh (p = .031), patient age (p = .022), preoperative fibroglandular tissue (FGT) volume (p = .012) and preoperative whole breast volume (including the skin envelope and nipple-areola-complex) (p = .030). The reduction in the postoperative compared to preoperative skin envelope thickness measured medially and laterally reached statistical significance in the NSM-cohort (medial p < .001, lateral p = .001) and showed a numerical difference in the RME and SSM-cohort. CONCLUSION Mastectomy type, reconstruction, ADM or mesh, patient age, preoperative FGT volume and whole breast volume were identified as risk factors for RFGT in univariable analysis. The observed reduction in the post- compared to preoperative skin envelope thickness should be avoided considering the known associated increase in risk for ischemic complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deutschmann Christine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Singer F Christian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Korbatits Ricarda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Kraus Christine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Gschwantler-Kaulich Daphne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Leser Carmen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Marzogi Alaa
- Department of Medical Imaging, King Abdullah Medical City Specialist Hospital, Muzdalifah Rd, Al Mashair, Makkah, 24246, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Helbich H Thomas
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Pfeiler Georg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
| | - Clauser Paola
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lv W, Fu P, Wu P. Updated findings of skin flap thickness and residual breast tissue after mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Updates Surg 2024; 76:829-838. [PMID: 37864625 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01675-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence on the ideal retention thickness of skin flap in mastectomy. Residual breast tissue (RBT) after mastectomy still represents an unknown risk for local recurrence or new breast cancer lesions. We made this systematic review to identify the optimal flap after mastectomy with minimal complications and better oncological safety. METHODS A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library with the search terms relevant to skin flap thickness and residual breast tissue in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. RESULTS Twenty-one studies were included of which fifteen studies enrolled 3814 patients who received mastectomy, and additional six studies were based on cadavers or breast specimens. Four studies confirmed the presence of the superficial fascial layer (Camper's fascia) which can theoretically be used as an anatomical marker for flap retention during mastectomy. Two other studies confirmed Camper's fascia deficiency to a greater or lesser extent. The flap thickness ranged from 3.8 mm to 23 mm in 2692 patients of 7 studies, which was related to BMI, breast size, and examination modalities. Two retrospective and one prospective studies confirmed flaps exceeding 5 mm could significantly increase postoperative complications. Nine studies including 1122 patients explored the association among flap thickness, RBT, and complications, 3 studies of which confirmed excessive flap thickness could cause a significant increase in RBT, which proved to be a potential risk factor for local recurrence in 3 studies. Flaps beyond 5 mm were also found to significantly increase the chance of local recurrence in 4 studies. CONCLUSION Camper's fascia can serve as an ideal demarcation between fat and breast tissue based on most current studies. 5 mm thickness of the flap retention in mastectomy is recommended if Camper's fascia is absent or obscure, through which better cosmetic outcomes and less RBT can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Lv
- Department of Breast Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Pinting Fu
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jørgensen AK, Bille C, Jylling AMB, Kaidar-Person O, Tramm T. Pathology and resection margins following mastectomy prior to immediate breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2024; 13:561-570. [PMID: 38720674 PMCID: PMC11074653 DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Risk of local recurrence (LR) (and even distant disease-free survival) after mastectomy is associated with margin status. Furthermore, the vast majority of LR are located at the anterior (superficial) margin. Margins in mastectomy are considered anatomical borders and not true resection margins; such a conception may erroneously lead to underestimation of the risk of LR after mastectomy. If dissection is accurate along the fascia, only skin, subcutaneous tissue and minimal residual breast gland tissue (rBGT) are expected to remain in the patient. However, the subcutaneous fascia is an inconsistent anatomical structure that may be absent in almost half of patients. Studies and routine clinical practice suggest that resection may frequently, though often focally, be within the breast glandular tissue leaving various amounts of rBGT. Such areas may be nidus for subsequent de novo or recurrent premalignant or malignant disease. There is no consensus on handling of close/positive margins and intervention is extrapolated from studies on breast conserving surgery with subsequent radiotherapy. Handling of a close/positive margin is complicated by poor correlation between the ex vivo findings on the specimen and the attempt to relocate the area of concern in a patient with reconstructed breasts. In this clinical practice review, we strongly advocate for reporting of the lesion-to-margin distance in mastectomies to collect further evidence on the association between LR and margin status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Camilla Bille
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Marie Bak Jylling
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Research Unit of Pathology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- The School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu WP, Lai HW, Liao CY, Lin J, Huang HI, Chen ST, Chou CT, Chen DR. Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluating Residual Breast Tissue After Robotic-Assisted Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Women With Early Breast Cancer. Korean J Radiol 2023; 24:640-646. [PMID: 37404106 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prospective studies on postoperative residual breast tissue (RBT) after robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) for breast cancer are limited. RBT presents an unknown risk of local recurrence or the development of new cancer after curative or risk-reducing mastectomies. This study investigated the technical feasibility of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate RBT after R-NSM in women with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective pilot study, 105 patients, who underwent R-NSM for breast cancer at Changhua Christian Hospital between March 2017 and May 2022, were subjected to postoperative breast MRI to evaluate the presence and location of RBT. The postoperative MRI scans of 43 patients (age, 47.8 ± 8.5 years), with existing preoperative MRI scans, were evaluated for the presence and location of RBT. In total, 54 R-NSM procedures were performed. In parallel, we reviewed the literature on RBT after nipple-sparing mastectomy, considering its prevalence. RESULTS RBT was detected in 7 (13.0%) of the 54 mastectomies (6 of the 48 therapeutic mastectomies and 1 of the 6 prophylactic mastectomies). The most common location for RBT was behind the nipple-areolar complex (5 of 7 [71.4%]). Another RBT was found in the upper inner quadrant (2 of 7 [28.6%]). Among the six patients who underwent RBT after therapeutic mastectomies, one patient developed a local recurrence of the skin flap. The other five patients with RBT after therapeutic mastectomies remained disease-free. CONCLUSION R-NSM, a surgical innovation, does not seem to increase the prevalence of RBT, and breast MRI showed feasibility as a noninvasive imaging tool for evaluating the presence and location of RBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Pei Wu
- Department of Radiology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Wen Lai
- Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Division of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Endoscopic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Division of Breast Surgery, Yuanlin Christian Hospital, Yuanlin, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Chiung-Ying Liao
- Department of Radiology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Joseph Lin
- Division of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-I Huang
- Department of Information Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- We-Sing Breast Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shou-Tung Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Te Chou
- Department of Radiology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Dar-Ren Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Deutschmann C, Singer CF, Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Pfeiler G, Leser C, Baltzer PAT, Helbich TH, Kraus C, Korbatits R, Marzogi A, Clauser P. Residual fibroglandular breast tissue after mastectomy is associated with an increased risk of a local recurrence or a new primary breast cancer". BMC Cancer 2023; 23:281. [PMID: 36978031 PMCID: PMC10044359 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10764-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residual fibroglandular breast tissue (RFGT) following a mastectomy has been claimed to be associated with the occurrence of an in-breast local recurrence (IBLR) or new primary tumor (NP). Yet, scientific evidence proving this assumption is lacking. The primary aim of the study was to verify whether RFGT following a mastectomy is a risk factor for an IBLR or NP. METHODS This retrospective analysis included all patients that underwent a mastectomy and were followed up at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University of Vienna between 01.01.2015 and 26.02.2020. RFGT volume (assessed on magnetic resonance imaging) was correlated with the prevalence of an IBLR and a NP. RESULTS A total of 105 patients (126 breasts) following a therapeutic mastectomy were included. After a mean follow-up of 46.0 months an IBLR had occurred in 17 breasts and a NP in 1 breast. A significant difference in RFGT volume was observed between the disease-free cohort and the subgroup with an IBLR or NP (p = .017). A RFGT volume of ≥ 1153 mm3 increased the risk by the factor 3.57 [95%CI 1.27; 10.03]. CONCLUSIONS RFGT volume is associated with an increased risk for an IBLR or NP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Deutschmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Pfeiler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Carmen Leser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pascal A T Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas H Helbich
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christine Kraus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ricarda Korbatits
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alaa Marzogi
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tramm T, Kaidar-Person O. Optimising post-operative radiation therapy after oncoplastic and reconstructive procedures. Breast 2023; 69:366-374. [PMID: 37023565 PMCID: PMC10119683 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical techniques for breast cancer have been refined over the past decades to deliver an aesthetic outcome as close as possible to the contralateral intact breast. Current surgery further allows excellent aesthetic outcome even in case of mastectomy, by performing skin sparing or nipple sparing mastectomy in combination with breast reconstruction. In this review we discuss how to optimise post-operative radiation therapy after oncoplastic and breast reconstructive procedures, including dose, fractionation, volumes, surgical margins, and boost application.
Collapse
|
8
|
Dietzel F, Kolberg L, Vesper AS, Hoffmann J, Nestle-Krämling C, Zwiefel K, Friebe V, Sawicki LM, Bruckmann NM, Jannusch K, Morawitz J, Antoch G, Fehm TN, Kirchner J, Mohrmann S. Factors Influencing Residual Glandular Breast Tissue after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in Genetically Predisposed Individuals Detected by MRI Mammography. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:829. [PMID: 36765786 PMCID: PMC9913581 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study seeks to evaluate MR imaging morphological factors and other covariates that influence the presence of residual glandular tissue after risk-reducing mastectomy in patients with a familial predisposition. METHODS We analyzed women of a high-risk collective with pathogenic mutation (BRCA1 (n = 49), BRCA2 (n = 24), or further mutation (n = 9)). A total of 117 breasts were analyzed, 63 left and 54 right, from a cohort of 81 patients, who were on average 40 years old. The mean follow-up was 63 months (range 12-180 months, SD = 39.67). Retrospective analysis of MR imaging data from 2006-2022 of patients of a high-risk collective (all carriers of a pathogenic mutation) with contralateral (RRCM) or bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (RRBM) was performed. In the image data the remaining skin flap thickness by distance measurements at eight equally distributed, clockwise points and the retromamillary area, as well as by volumetry of each breast, was elected. Residual glandular tissue was also volumetrized. In addition, patient-related covariates were recorded and their influence on postoperative residual glandular tissue and skin flap thickness was analyzed by uni- and multivariate regressions. RESULTS A significant association with postoperative residual glandular tissue was shown in multivariate analysis for the independent variables breast density, skin flap mean, and surgical method (all p-values < 0.01). A negatively significant association could be seen for the variables preoperative breast volume (p-values < 0.01) and surgeon experience (most p-values < 0.05-<0.1). CONCLUSION Postoperative residual glandular tissue is an important tool for quantifying the risk of developing breast cancer after risk-reducing mastectomy. Different effects on residual glandular tissue were shown for the independent variables breast density, skin flap, surgical method, preoperative breast volume, and surgeon experience, so these should be considered in future surgical procedures preoperatively as well as postoperatively. Breast MRI has proven to be a suitable method to analyze the skin flap as well as the RGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederic Dietzel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Leoni Kolberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Wuppertal, 42109 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Anne Sophie Vesper
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Karin Zwiefel
- Breast Center, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, 51067 Köln, Germany
| | - Verena Friebe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Lino M. Sawicki
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Nils Martin Bruckmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Kai Jannusch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Janna Morawitz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Gerald Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Tanja Natascha Fehm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Julian Kirchner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Svjetlana Mohrmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Skoglund MA, Andersson MN, Björkgren A, Tolocka E, Sund M, Wiberg R. Inter- and intra-observer agreement on evaluating the presence of residual glandular tissue with magnetic resonance tomography following prophylactic mastectomy. Acta Radiol 2023; 64:67-73. [PMID: 34851154 PMCID: PMC9780752 DOI: 10.1177/02841851211058929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no published international consensus or guideline documents regarding appropriate medical follow-up for women with hereditary increased risk of breast cancer who opt for prophylactic mastectomy. Moreover, it is not known whether breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed after a prophylactic mastectomy is a reproducible method for evaluating whether clinically relevant amounts of residual glandular tissue remains. PURPOSE To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement on detecting residual glandular tissue with MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 40 women previously operated with prophylactic mastectomy underwent MRI and two breast radiologists (R1 and R2) independently assessed the presence of residual glandular tissue. Inter- and intra-rater agreements were assessed using Cohen's kappa (k). RESULTS Residual glandular tissue was found in 69 of 248 quadrants (27.8%) and 32 of 62 breasts (51.6%) by R1 and 77 of 248 quadrants (31.1%) and 35 of 62 breasts (56.5%) by R2. The interrater agreement was observed to be moderate (k = 0.554) and the intra-rater agreement was observed to be substantial (k = 0.623). CONCLUSION In conclusion, the inter-and intra-rater observer agreement in regard to detection of residual glandular tissue was not excellent, which would be desirable for a method considered reproducible enough to be used as a surveillance tool after the surgical procedure in order to ensure that there is no relevant residual glandular tissue remaining warranting further follow-up. More research is needed, as well as establishment of precise protocols, before using the method in risk assessment of remaining glandular tissue and breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Märta A Skoglund
- Department of Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Plastic surgery and Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Magnus N Andersson
- Department of Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Plastic surgery and Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Annika Björkgren
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology and Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ernst Tolocka
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology and Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Malin Sund
- Department of Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Plastic surgery and Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Rebecca Wiberg
- Department of Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Plastic surgery and Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden,Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Section of Anatomy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden,Rebecca Wiberg, Department of Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Plastic surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Joo JH, Yang JD, Park HY, Park J, Wu ZY, Ko B, Jongmoo P, Kim SS. The patterns and spatial locations of local recurrence in breast cancer with implant-based reconstruction after mastectomy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 170:111-117. [PMID: 35245569 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) recently defined delineation guidelines for the clinical target volume for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) after immediate implant-based reconstruction for early-stage breast cancer. We analyzed the three-dimensional location and pattern of local recurrence in accordance with the reconstruction type and ESTRO-target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study involved patients who had undergone mastectomy with implant reconstruction between 2010 and 2019 and who had local recurrence as the first event. For mapping analysis, one subpectoral and one prepectoral implant patient were selected. All recurrence lesions were contoured and mapped in a representative case. RESULTS A total of 1,327 patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction were identified; 51 were enrolled with a total of 65 lesions. In subpectoral implant patients, 93% of recurrences were located in the ESTRO-target volume. No recurrence occurred in the implant pocket, but 7% of the recurrent tumors developed in the pectoralis major and deep thoracic muscle. In prepectoral implant patients, all recurrent tumors occurred within the ESTRO-target volume. CONCLUSION The ESTRO-target volume in PMRT after reconstruction encompassed most local recurrences in patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction. Our results support the application of the ESTRO Advisory Committee for Radiation Oncology Practice consensus guideline for target volume of PMRT after immediate implant-based reconstruction for early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyeon Joo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Dug Yang
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Yong Park
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaehyeon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Zhen-Yu Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - BeomSeok Ko
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Park Jongmoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Su Ssan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Prophylactic mastectomy – Correlation between skin flap thickness and residual glandular tissue evaluated postoperatively by imaging. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:1813-1819. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
12
|
Pitiyarachchi O, Phillips KA, Friedlander M. Pregnancy induced hyperplasia of residual breast tissue following risk reducing contralateral mastectomy - simply interesting or a clinically important observation. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 30:100504. [PMID: 34990902 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
After a diagnosis of breast cancer women with increased genetic risk often have a risk reducing contralateral mastectomy, and may opt for a nipple or skin sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. A variable amount of residual breast tissue remains which may substantially increase in volume during pregnancy. Whether this increases later risk of breast cancer is unknown. We describe the clinical details of 3 patients with a history of unilateral breast cancer, including 2 with a BRCA mutation, who developed hyperplasia of residual breast tissue in the 3rd trimester of a later pregnancy. They all had a delayed contralateral risk reducing skin sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Pregnancy occurred some years later. We summarise their management, review the literature and raise questions for discussion. All developed prominent hyperplasia of breast tissue in the 3rd trimester that was clinically obvious asymmetrical breast swelling in the reconstructed contralateral breast. MRI demonstrated substantial breast tissue. The risk of breast cancer, particularly in those at high genetic risk developing in the residual breast tissue is unknown but in view of the volume, breast tissue was excised postpartum. This phenomenon of pregnancy induced hyperplasia of breast tissue after risk reducing mastectomy is not well described .There is residual breast tissue following a risk reducing subcutaneous mastectomy. The risk factors include age and skin flap thickness. MRI can demonstrate the residual breast tissue. Pregnancy induced hyperplasia of residual breast tissue may occur after risk reducing mastectomy with a hypothetical increased risk of subsequent breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omali Pitiyarachchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker St, Randwick NSW 2031, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker St, Randwick NSW 2031, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carbonara N, La Forgia D, Pellegrino R, Ressa C, Tommasi S. A Cost Decision Model Supporting Treatment Strategy Selection in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers in Breast Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:847. [PMID: 34575624 PMCID: PMC8470684 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In this paper, a cost decision-making model that compares the healthcare costs for diverse treatment strategies is built for BRCA-mutated women with breast cancer. Moreover, this model calculates the cancer treatment costs that could potentially be prevented, if the treatment strategy with the lowest total cost, along the entire lifetime of the patient, is chosen for high-risk women with breast cancer. The benchmark of the healthcare costs for diverse treatment strategies is selected in the presence of uncertainty, i.e., considering, throughout the lifetime of the patient, the risks and complications that may arise in each strategy and, therefore, the costs associated with the management of such events. Our results reveal a clear economic advantage of adopting the cost decision-making model for benchmarking the healthcare costs for various treatment strategies for BRCA-mutated women with breast cancer. The cost savings were higher when all breast cancer patients underwent counseling and genetic testing before deciding on any diagnostic-therapeutic path, with a probability of obtaining savings of over 75%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nunzia Carbonara
- Departments of Mechanics Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy;
| | - Daniele La Forgia
- SSD Radiodiagnostica Senologica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Roberta Pellegrino
- Departments of Mechanics Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy;
| | - Cosmo Ressa
- S.C. Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Stefania Tommasi
- SSD Diagnostica Molecolare e Farmacogenetica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tramm T, Christiansen P, Offersen BV, Madsen KB, Poortmans P, Kaidar-Person O. Superficial margins in skin sparing and nipple sparing mastectomies for DCIS: A margin of potential concern. Radiother Oncol 2021; 161:177-182. [PMID: 34139212 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction for breast cancer are increasing. The superficial fascia is considered a natural border and the superficial margin may not be evaluated. We emphasize the need for reporting of the superficial margin status in these procedures to obtain valid information on its association with local recurrence risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Peer Christiansen
- Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | | | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology or GROW (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kanana N, Ben David MA, Nissan N, Yagil Y, Shalmon A, Halshtok O, Gotlieb M, Faermann R, Klang E, Samoocha D, Yassin M, Davidson T, Zippel D, Madorsky Feldman D, Friedman E, Kaidar-Person O, Sklair Levy M. Post-mastectomy surveillance of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: Outcomes from a specialized clinic for high-risk breast cancer patients. Breast J 2021; 27:441-447. [PMID: 33576117 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Female BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers may elect bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. There is a paucity of data on yield of imaging surveillance after risk-reducing mastectomy. This retrospective study focused on female BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers who underwent bilateral mastectomy either as primary preventative, or as secondary preventative, after breast cancer diagnosis. All participants underwent breast imaging at 6- to 12-month intervals after mastectomy. Data on subsequent breast cancer diagnosis and timing were collected and compared between the groups. Overall, 184 female mutation carriers (134 BRCA1, 45 BRCA2, 5 both BRCA genes) underwent bilateral mastectomy after initial breast cancer diagnosis, between April 1, 2009 and August 31, 2018. During a mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 4.2 years, 13 (7.06%) were diagnosed with breast cancer; 12 ipsilateral (range: 0.4-28.8 years) and 1 contralateral breast cancer, 15.9 years after surgery. On the contrary, among asymptomatic BRCA1 (n = 40) and BRCA2 (n = 13) mutation carriers who underwent primary risk-reducing mastectomy (mean age at surgery 39.5 ± 8.4 years); none has developed breast cancer after a mean follow-up of 5.4 ± 3.4 years. BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers with prior disease who underwent risk-reducing mastectomy after breast cancer diagnosis are still prone for developing ipsi or contralateral breast cancer, and therefore may benefit from continues clinical and imaging surveillance, unlike BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers who undergo primary preventative bilateral mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nayroz Kanana
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Meirav A Ben David
- The Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Noam Nissan
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Yael Yagil
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Anat Shalmon
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Osnat Halshtok
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Michael Gotlieb
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Renata Faermann
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Eyal Klang
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - David Samoocha
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Mohammad Yassin
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Tima Davidson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Dov Zippel
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Dana Madorsky Feldman
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel.,The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel.,The Sackler school of medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat-gan, Israel.,The Sackler school of medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (Maastro, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Miri Sklair Levy
- Meirav High Risk Clinic, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-gan, Israel.,The Sackler school of medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kaidar-Person O, Offersen BV, Boersma LJ, de Ruysscher D, Tramm T, Kühn T, Gentilini O, Mátrai Z, Poortmans P. A multidisciplinary view of mastectomy and breast reconstruction: Understanding the challenges. Breast 2021; 56:42-52. [PMID: 33610903 PMCID: PMC7905468 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The current review paper was written in collaboration with breast cancer surgeons from the European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists (EUBREAST), a breast pathologist from the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG), and representatives from the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) breast cancer course. Herein we summarize the different mastectomies and reconstruction procedures and define high-risk anatomical areas for breast cancer recurrences, to further specify the challenges in the surgical procedure, histopathological evaluation, and target volumes in case of postmastectomy irradiation, as recommended by the ESTRO guidelines according to the surgical procedure. The paper has original figures and illustrations for all disciplines for in-depth understanding of the differences between the procedures. Mastectomy techniques and reconstruction evolved to improve cosmetic outcomes. Different techniques maybe associated with different amount of residual breast tissue. More data is needed to estimate who are the patients at risk for residual disease or recurrence. Multidisciplinary work needed to individualise treatment for optimal oncological outcomes while maintaining the significant improvements in achieving better cosmesis for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, At Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - Oreste Gentilini
- Breast Surgery Unit, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Zoltán Mátrai
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, 1122, Budapest, Ráth György U 7, Hungary
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, 2610, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2610, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Screening in patients with increased risk of breast cancer (part 2). Where are we now? Actual MRI screening controversies. RADIOLOGIA 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
18
|
Alonso Roca S, Delgado Laguna AB, Arantzeta Lexarreta J, Cajal Campo B, López Ruiz A. Screening in patients with increased risk of breast cancer (part 2). Where are we now? Actual MRI screening controversies. RADIOLOGIA 2020; 62:417-433. [PMID: 32527577 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2020.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
For women with a high risk of breast cancer, early detection plays an important role. Due to the high incidence of breast cancer, and at a younger age than in the general population, screening begins earlier, and there is considerable evidence that magnetic resonance is the most sensitive diagnostic tool, and the principal American and European guidelines agree on the recommendation to perform annual magnetic resonance (with supplemental annual mammography) as an optimal mode of screening. In addition to the absence of current consensus on which patients should be included in the recommendation for magnetic resonance screening (widely discussed in the introduction of part 1 of this work), there are other aspects that are different between guidelines, that are not specified, or that are susceptible to change based on the evidence of several years of experience, that we have called «controversies», such as the age to begin screening, the possible advisability of using a different strategy in different subgroups, performing alternate versus synchronous magnetic resonance and mammography, the age at which to terminate the two techniques, or how to follow up after risk reduction surgery.The aim of the second part of the paper is, by reviewing the literature, to provide an update in relation to some of the main «controversies» in high risk screening with magnetic resonance. And finally, based on all this, to propose a possible model of optimal and updated screening protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Alonso Roca
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España.
| | - A B Delgado Laguna
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - J Arantzeta Lexarreta
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - B Cajal Campo
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - A López Ruiz
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kaidar-Person O, Boersma LJ, Poortmans P, Sklair-Levy M, Offersen BV, Cardoso MJ, de Ruysscher D. Residual Glandular Breast Tissue After Mastectomy: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:2288-2296. [PMID: 32390098 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08516-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of mastectomy is remove all of the glandular breast tissue (BGT) without compromising skin flaps viability. The purpose of this systematic review was to localize and/or estimate the amount of residual BGT (rBGT) after mastectomy and to identify factors that could be related to rBGT and/or residual disease. METHODS We conducted a PubMed search. The report was subdivided according to the method used to evaluate the presence of rBGT. A total of 16 publications were included in our final report. Two main methods for identifying rBGT included imaging (i.e., MRI scan) and histological evaluation at the time of mastectomy. RESULTS The rate of rBGT was reported in up to 100% of the patients and was found to be associated mainly with the type of surgical resection, indication, and surgeon's expertise. Residual breast tissue can be found in all areas of the remaining chest wall, mostly in the skin-flaps, and more frequently underneath the nipple-areola complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Radiation Unit at Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. .,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology or GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Miri Sklair-Levy
- Meirav Breast Center, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria-Joao Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalilaud Foundation and Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Poortmans PMP, Takanen S, Marta GN, Meattini I, Kaidar-Person O. Winter is over: The use of Artificial Intelligence to individualise radiation therapy for breast cancer. Breast 2020; 49:194-200. [PMID: 31931265 PMCID: PMC7375562 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence demonstrated its value for automated contouring of organs at risk and target volumes as well as for auto-planning of radiation dose distributions in terms of saving time, increasing consistency, and improving dose-volumes parameters. Future developments include incorporating dose/outcome data to optimise dose distributions with optimal coverage of the high-risk areas, while at the same time limiting doses to low-risk areas. An infinite gradient of volumes and doses to deliver spatially-adjusted radiation can be generated, allowing to avoid unnecessary radiation to organs at risk. Therefore, data about patient-, tumour-, and treatment-related factors have to be combined with dose distributions and outcome-containing databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Silvia Takanen
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Paris, France
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology - Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brazil; Department of Radiology and Oncology - Radiation Oncology, Instituto Do Câncer Do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Breast Radiation Unit, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kaidar-Person O, Vrou Offersen B, Hol S, Arenas M, Aristei C, Bourgier C, Cardoso MJ, Chua B, Coles CE, Engberg Damsgaard T, Gabrys D, Jagsi R, Jimenez R, Kirby AM, Kirkove C, Kirova Y, Kouloulias V, Marinko T, Meattini I, Mjaaland I, Nader Marta G, Witt Nystrom P, Senkus E, Skyttä T, Tvedskov TF, Verhoeven K, Poortmans P. ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline for target volume delineation in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy after implant-based immediate reconstruction for early stage breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2019; 137:159-166. [PMID: 31108277 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates after mastectomy are increasing. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) contouring guidelines for target volumes in the setting of IBR are lacking. Therefore, many patients who have had IBR receive PMRT to target volumes similar to conventional simulator-based whole breast irradiation. The aim of this paper is to describe delineation guidelines for PMRT after implant-based IBR based on a thorough understanding of the surgical procedures, disease stage, patterns of recurrence and radiation techniques. They are based on a consensus endorsed by a global multidisciplinary group of breast cancer experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Sandra Hol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Verbeeten, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Meritxell Arenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, University Rovira i Virgili, Spain
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Celine Bourgier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICM - Val d'Aurelle, INSERM U1194, IRCM; Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Maria Joao Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, and Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Boon Chua
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Dorota Gabrys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Rachel Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Anna M Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Carine Kirkove
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital St-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, 2nd Dpt of Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, Athens, Greece
| | - Tanja Marinko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Italy, Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Ingvil Mjaaland
- Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Radiology and Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Petra Witt Nystrom
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden and Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Elzbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Tanja Skyttä
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Finland
| | - Tove F Tvedskov
- Dept. of Breast Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karolien Verhoeven
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Netherlands
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, and Paris Sciences & Lettres University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Grinstein O, Krug B, Hellmic M, Siedek F, Malter W, Burke C, Schmutzler R, Maintz D, Rhiem K. Residual glandular tissue (RGT) in BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers with unilateral and bilateral prophylactic mastectomies. Surg Oncol 2019; 29:126-133. [PMID: 31196476 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic mastectomy (PME) is increasingly performed in women carrying deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. The oncologic risk resulting from residual fibroglandular tissue (RGT) is unknown. METHODS All women who had received a mastectomy and at least one postoperative breast MRI, between 2006 and 2016 were extracted from the register of the Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cologne (CHBOC). The index MRI was evaluated in terms of basic clinical data and the morphological criteria of RGT. The RGT volume was measured in diameter and was semi-automatically evaluated using software. RESULTS We identified 169 women carrying BRCA1/2 mutations who underwent prophylactic and curative mastectomy: a total of 338 breasts. RGT was found in 128 of the 338 breasts (37.9%). 68 of the 128 breasts (53.1%) were related to bilateral PME, 37 (28.9%) to unilateral PME and 23 (18.0%) to curative mastectomy. RGT was predominantly unifocal and located in the retroareolar breast region. RGT was observed more often after bilateral PME (p < 0.0001). In this subgroup, the nipple-sparing mastectomy dominated (108 of 136, 79.4%), in contrast to 23 standard mastectomies (23 of 94, 24.5%) in the subgroup of curative mastectomy (23%). There was a trend towards higher amounts of RGT in surgical units with fewer mastectomies performed. During follow-up, two breast cancers were detected after bilateral and unilateral PME, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the indication for surgery and in particular the selected surgical procedure affect the surgical outcome with respect to RGT. Oncological safety should not be neglected, especially in the high-risk group of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Grinstein
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Barbara Krug
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany.
| | - Martin Hellmic
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Siedek
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfram Malter
- Breast Center, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Christina Burke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - David Maintz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Papassotiropoulos B, Güth U, Chiesa F, Rageth C, Amann E, Baege A, Elfgen C, Varga Z, Moskovszky L, Endhardt K, Masser R, Tinguely M, Farhadi J, Lardi A, Dammann F, Diebold J, Li Q, Dubsky P, Tausch C. Prospective Evaluation of Residual Breast Tissue After Skin- or Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Results of the SKINI-Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1254-1262. [PMID: 30830538 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07259-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was designed to investigate the presence of residual breast tissue (RBT) after skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and to analyse patient- and therapy-related factors associated with RBT. Skin-sparing mastectomy and NSM are increasingly used surgical procedures. Prospective data on the completeness of breast tissue resection is lacking. However, such data are crucial for assessing oncologic safety of risk-reducing and curative mastectomies. METHODS Between April 2016 and August 2017, 99 SSM and 61 NSM were performed according to the SKINI-trial protocol, under either curative (n = 109) or risk-reducing (n = 51) indication. After breast removal, biopsies from the skin envelope (10 biopsies per SSM, 14 biopsies per NSM) were taken in predefined radial localizations and assessed histologically for the presence of RBT and of residual disease. RESULTS Residual breast tissue was detected in 82 (51.3%) mastectomies. The median RBT percentage per breast was 7.1%. Of all factors considered, only type of surgery (40.4% for SSM vs. 68.9% for NSM; P < 0.001) and surgeon (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with RBT. None of the remaining factors, e.g., skin flap necrosis, was associated significantly with RBT. Residual disease was detected in three biopsies. CONCLUSIONS Residual breast tissue is commonly observed after SSM and NSM. In contrast, invasive or in situ carcinomas are rarely found in the skin envelope. Radicality of mastectomy in this trial is not associated with increased incidence of skin flap necrosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03470909.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Uwe Güth
- Department of Breast Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Federica Chiesa
- Department of Breast Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Rageth
- Department of Breast Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Esther Amann
- Department of Breast Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Astrid Baege
- Department of Breast Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Constanze Elfgen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Zsuzsanna Varga
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Linda Moskovszky
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Katharina Endhardt
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Jian Farhadi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Lardi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Qiyu Li
- Statistician Unit, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Dubsky
- Breast Center, Hirslanden Clinic St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Tausch
- Department of Breast Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|