Validation of a fully automated liver segmentation algorithm using multi-scale deep reinforcement learning and comparison versus manual segmentation

Artificial Intelligence in Perioperative Planning and Management of Liver Resection

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a speciality within computer science that deals with creating systems that can replicate the intelligence of a human mind and has problem-solving abilities. AI includes a diverse array of techniques and approaches such as machine learning, neural networks, natural language processing, robotics, and expert systems. An electronic literature search was conducted using the databases of "PubMed" and "Google Scholar". The period for the search was from 2000 to June 2023. The search terms included "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "liver cancers", "liver tumors", "hepatectomy", "perioperative" and their synonyms in various combinations. The search also included all MeSH terms. The extracted articles were further reviewed in a step-wise manner for identification of relevant studies. A total of 148 articles were identified after the initial literature search. Initial review included screening of article titles for relevance and identifying duplicates. Finally, 65 articles were reviewed for this review article. The future of AI in liver cancer planning and management holds immense promise. AI-driven advancements will increasingly enable precise tumour detection, location, and characterisation through enhanced image analysis. ML algorithms will predict patient-specific treatment responses and complications, allowing for tailored therapies. Surgical robots and AI-guided procedures will enhance the precision of liver resections, reducing risks and improving outcomes. AI will also streamline patient monitoring, better hemodynamic management, enabling early detection of recurrence or complications. Moreover, AI will facilitate data-driven research, accelerating the development of novel treatments and therapies. Ultimately, AI's integration will revolutionise liver cancer care, offering personalised, efficient and effective solutions, improving patients' quality of life and survival rates.

Liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions: history, rationale, and emerging tools

BACKGROUND

Postoperative hepatic insufficiency (PHI) is the most feared complication after hepatectomy. Volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) is one objectively measurable indicator to identify patients at risk of PHI. In this review, we summarized the development and rationale for the use of liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions and highlighted emerging tools that could yield new advancements in liver volumetry.

METHODS

A review of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify literature related to liver volumetry. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional publications.

RESULTS

Liver volumetry based on radiologic imaging was developed in the 1980s to identify patients at risk of PHI and later used in the 1990s to evaluate grafts for living donor living transplantation. The field evolved in the 2000s by the introduction of standardized FLR based on the hepatic metabolic demands and in the 2010s by the introduction of the degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate as measures of the FLR regenerative and functional capacity. Several liver-regenerative interventions, most notably portal vein embolization, are used to increase resectability and reduce the risk of PHI. In parallel with the increase in automation and machine assistance to physicians, many semi- and fully automated tools are being developed to facilitate liver volumetry.

CONCLUSION

Liver volumetry is the most reliable tool to detect patients at risk of PHI. Advances in imaging analysis technologies, newly developed functional measures, and liver-regenerative interventions have been improving our ability to perform safe hepatectomy.

Signal Intensity Trajectories Clustering for Liver Vasculature Segmentation and Labeling (LiVaS) on Contrast-Enhanced MR Images: A Feasibility Pilot Study

This study aims to develop a semiautomated pipeline and user interface (LiVaS) for rapid segmentation and labeling of MRI liver vasculature and evaluate its time efficiency and accuracy against manual reference standard. Retrospective feasibility pilot study. Liver MR images from different scanners from 36 patients were included, and 4/36 patients were randomly selected for manual segmentation as referenced standard. The liver was segmented in each contrast phase and masks registered to the pre-contrast segmentation. Voxel-wise signal trajectories were clustered using the k-means algorithm. Voxel clusters that best segment the liver vessels were selected and labeled by three independent radiologists and a research scientist using LiVaS. Segmentation times were compared using a paired-sample t-test on log-transformed data. The agreement was analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using DSC for hepatic and portal vein segmentations. The mean segmentation time among four readers was significantly shorter than manual (3.6 ± 1.4 vs. 70.0 ± 29.2 min; p < 0.001), even when using a higher number of clusters to enhance accuracy. The DSC for portal and hepatic veins reached up to 0.69 and 0.70, respectively. LiVaS segmentations were overall of good quality, with variations in performance related to the presence/severity of liver disease, acquisition timing, and image quality. Our semi-automated pipeline was robust to different MRI vendors in producing segmentation and labeling of liver vasculature in agreement with expert manual annotations, with significantly higher time efficiency. LiVaS could facilitate the creation of large, annotated datasets for training and validation of neural networks for automated MRI liver vascularity segmentation. HIGHLIGHTS: Key Finding: In this pilot feasibility study, our semiautomated pipeline for segmentation of liver vascularity (LiVaS) on MR images produced segmentations with simultaneous labeling of portal and hepatic veins in good agreement with the manual reference standard but at significantly shorter times (mean LiVaS 3.6 ± 1.4 vs. mean manual 70.0 ± 29.2 min; p < 0.001). Importance: LiVaS was robust in producing liver MRI vascular segmentations across images from different scanners in agreement with expert manual annotations, with significant ly higher time efficiency, and therefore potential scalability.

Three-dimensional Liver Model Application for Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Children are removed from the liver transplant waitlist because of death or progressive illness. Size mismatch accounts for 30% of organ refusal. This study aimed to demonstrate that 3-dimensional (3D) technology is a feasible and accurate adjunct to organ allocation and living donor selection process.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study included pediatric liver transplant candidates and living donors from January 2020 to February 2023. Patient-specific, 3D-printed liver models were used for anatomic planning, real-time evaluation during organ procurement, and surgical navigation. The primary outcome was to determine model accuracy. The secondary outcome was to determine the impact of outcomes in living donor hepatectomy. Study groups were analyzed using propensity score matching with a retrospective cohort.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight recipients were included. The median percentage error was -0.6% for 3D models and had the highest correlation to the actual liver explant (Pearson's R = 0.96, P < 0.001) compared with other volume calculation methods. Patient and graft survival were comparable. From 41 living donors, the median percentage error of the allograft was 12.4%. The donor-matched study group had lower central line utilization (21.4% versus 75%, P = 0.045), shorter length of stay (4 versus 7 d, P = 0.003), and lower mean comprehensive complication index (3 versus 21, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional volume is highly correlated with actual liver explant volume and may vary across different allografts for living donation. The addition of 3D-printed liver models during the transplant evaluation and organ procurement process is a feasible and safe adjunct to the perioperative decision-making process.

A combined encoder-transformer-decoder network for volumetric segmentation of adrenal tumors

BACKGROUND

The morphology of the adrenal tumor and the clinical statistics of the adrenal tumor area are two crucial diagnostic and differential diagnostic features, indicating precise tumor segmentation is essential. Therefore, we build a CT image segmentation method based on an encoder-decoder structure combined with a Transformer for volumetric segmentation of adrenal tumors.

METHODS

This study included a total of 182 patients with adrenal metastases, and an adrenal tumor volumetric segmentation method combining encoder-decoder structure and Transformer was constructed. The Dice Score coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance, Intersection over union (IOU), Average surface distance (ASD) and Mean average error (MAE) were calculated to evaluate the performance of the segmentation method.

RESULTS

Analyses were made among our proposed method and other CNN-based and transformer-based methods. The results showed excellent segmentation performance, with a mean DSC of 0.858, a mean Hausdorff distance of 10.996, a mean IOU of 0.814, a mean MAE of 0.0005, and a mean ASD of 0.509. The boxplot of all test samples' segmentation performance implies that the proposed method has the lowest skewness and the highest average prediction performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed method can directly generate 3D lesion maps and showed excellent segmentation performance. The comparison of segmentation metrics and visualization results showed that our proposed method performed very well in the segmentation.

Performance and clinical applicability of machine learning in liver computed tomography imaging: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Machine learning (ML) for medical imaging is emerging for several organs and image modalities. Our objectives were to provide clinicians with an overview of this field by answering the following questions: (1) How is ML applied in liver computed tomography (CT) imaging? (2) How well do ML systems perform in liver CT imaging? (3) What are the clinical applications of ML in liver CT imaging?

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out according to the guidelines from the PRISMA-P statement. The search string focused on studies containing content relating to artificial intelligence, liver, and computed tomography.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-one studies were included in the study. ML was applied to CT liver imaging by image analysis without clinicians' intervention in majority of studies while in newer studies the fusion of ML method with clinical intervention have been identified. Several were documented to perform very accurately on reliable but small data. Most models identified were deep learning-based, mainly using convolutional neural networks. Potentially many clinical applications of ML to CT liver imaging have been identified through our review including liver and its lesion segmentation and classification, segmentation of vascular structure inside the liver, fibrosis and cirrhosis staging, metastasis prediction, and evaluation of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Several studies attempted to provide transparent result of the model. To make the model convenient for a clinical application, prospective clinical validation studies are in urgent call. Computer scientists and engineers should seek to cooperate with health professionals to ensure this.

KEY POINTS

• ML shows great potential for CT liver image tasks such as pixel-wise segmentation and classification of liver and liver lesions, fibrosis staging, metastasis prediction, and retrieval of relevant liver lesions from similar cases of other patients. • Despite presenting the result is not standardized, many studies have attempted to provide transparent results to interpret the machine learning method performance in the literature. • Prospective studies are in urgent call for clinical validation of ML method, preferably carried out by cooperation between clinicians and computer scientists.

Reinforcement learning in medical image analysis: Concepts, applications, challenges, and future directions

MOTIVATION

Medical image analysis involves a series of tasks used to assist physicians in qualitative and quantitative analyses of lesions or anatomical structures which can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of medical diagnoses and prognoses. Traditionally, these tedious tasks were finished by experienced physicians or medical physicists and were marred with two major problems, low efficiency and bias. In the past decade, many machine learning methods have been applied to accelerate and automate the image analysis process. Compared to the enormous deployments of supervised and unsupervised learning models, attempts to use reinforcement learning in medical image analysis are still scarce. We hope that this review article could serve as the stepping stone for related research in the future.

SIGNIFICANCE

We found that although reinforcement learning has gradually gained momentum in recent years, many researchers in the medical analysis field still find it hard to understand and deploy in clinical settings. One possible cause is a lack of well-organized review articles intended for readers without professional computer science backgrounds. Rather than to provide a comprehensive list of all reinforcement learning models applied in medical image analysis, the aim of this review is to help the readers formulate and solve their medical image analysis research through the lens of reinforcement learning.

APPROACH & RESULTS

We selected published articles from Google Scholar and PubMed. Considering the scarcity of related articles, we also included some outstanding newest preprints. The papers were carefully reviewed and categorized according to the type of image analysis task. In this article, we first reviewed the basic concepts and popular models of reinforcement learning. Then, we explored the applications of reinforcement learning models in medical image analysis. Finally, we concluded the article by discussing the reviewed reinforcement learning approaches' limitations and possible future improvements.

Deep reinforcement learning and its applications in medical imaging and radiation therapy: a survey

Reinforcement learning takes sequential decision-making approaches by learning the policy through trial and error based on interaction with the environment. Combining deep learning and reinforcement learning can empower the agent to learn the interactions and the distribution of rewards from state-action pairs to achieve effective and efficient solutions in more complex and dynamic environments. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has demonstrated astonishing performance in surpassing the human-level performance in the game domain and many other simulated environments. This paper introduces the basics of reinforcement learning and reviews various categories of DRL algorithms and DRL models developed for medical image analysis and radiation treatment planning optimization. We will also discuss the current challenges of DRL and approaches proposed to make DRL more generalizable and robust in a real-world environment. DRL algorithms, by fostering the designs of the reward function, agents interactions and environment models, can resolve the challenges from scarce and heterogeneous annotated medical image data, which has been a major obstacle to implementing deep learning models in the clinic. DRL is an active research area with enormous potential to improve deep learning applications in medical imaging and radiation therapy planning.

Fully automated preoperative liver volumetry incorporating the anatomical location of the central hepatic vein

The precise preoperative calculation of functional liver volumes is essential prior major liver resections, as well as for the evaluation of a suitable donor for living donor liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to develop a fully automated, reproducible, and quantitative 3D volumetry of the liver from standard CT examinations of the abdomen as part of routine clinical imaging. Therefore, an in-house dataset of 100 venous phase CT examinations for training and 30 venous phase ex-house CT examinations with a slice thickness of 5 mm for testing and validating were fully annotated with right and left liver lobe. Multi-Resolution U-Net 3D neural networks were employed for segmenting these liver regions. The Sørensen-Dice coefficient was greater than 0.9726 ± 0.0058, 0.9639 ± 0.0088, and 0.9223 ± 0.0187 and a mean volume difference of 32.12 ± 19.40 ml, 22.68 ± 21.67 ml, and 9.44 ± 27.08 ml compared to the standard of reference (SoR) liver, right lobe, and left lobe annotation was achieved. Our results show that fully automated 3D volumetry of the liver on routine CT imaging can provide reproducible, quantitative, fast and accurate results without needing any examiner in the preoperative work-up for hepatobiliary surgery and especially for living donor liver transplantation.

Automated Three-Dimensional Liver Reconstruction with Artificial Intelligence for Virtual Hepatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To validate the newly developed artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted simulation by evaluating the speed of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and accuracy of segmental volumetry among patients with liver tumors.

BACKGROUND

AI with a deep learning algorithm based on healthy liver computer tomography images has been developed to assist three-dimensional liver reconstruction in virtual hepatectomy.

METHODS

3D reconstruction using hepatic computed tomography scans of 144 patients with liver tumors was performed using two different versions of Synapse 3D (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan): the manual method based on the tracking algorithm and the AI-assisted method. Processing time to 3D reconstruction and volumetry of whole liver, tumor-containing and tumor-free segments were compared.

RESULTS

The median total liver volume and the volume ratio of a tumor-containing and a tumor-free segment were calculated as 1035 mL, 9.4%, and 9.8% by the AI-assisted reconstruction, whereas 1120 mL, 9.9%, and 9.3% by the manual reconstruction method. The mean absolute deviations were 16.7 mL and 1.0% in the tumor-containing segment and 15.5 mL and 1.0% in the tumor-free segment. The processing time was shorter in the AI-assisted (2.1 vs. 35.0 min; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The virtual hepatectomy, including functional liver volumetric analysis, using the 3D liver models reconstructed by the AI-assisted methods, was reliable for the practical planning of liver tumor resections.

Deep Reinforcement Learning with Automated Label Extraction from Clinical Reports Accurately Classifies 3D MRI Brain Volumes

Image classification is probably the most fundamental task in radiology artificial intelligence. To reduce the burden of acquiring and labeling data sets, we employed a two-pronged strategy. We automatically extracted labels from radiology reports in Part 1. In Part 2, we used the labels to train a data-efficient reinforcement learning (RL) classifier. We applied the approach to a small set of patient images and radiology reports from our institution. For Part 1, we trained sentence-BERT (SBERT) on 90 radiology reports. In Part 2, we used the labels from the trained SBERT to train an RL-based classifier. We trained the classifier on a training set of [Formula: see text] images. We tested on a separate collection of [Formula: see text] images. For comparison, we also trained and tested a supervised deep learning (SDL) classification network on the same set of training and testing images using the same labels. Part 1: The trained SBERT model improved from 82 to [Formula: see text] accuracy. Part 2: Using Part 1's computed labels, SDL quickly overfitted the small training set. Whereas SDL showed the worst possible testing set accuracy of 50%, RL achieved [Formula: see text] testing set accuracy, with a [Formula: see text]-value of [Formula: see text]. We have shown the proof-of-principle application of automated label extraction from radiological reports. Additionally, we have built on prior work applying RL to classification using these labels, extending from 2D slices to entire 3D image volumes. RL has again demonstrated a remarkable ability to train effectively, in a generalized manner, and based on small training sets.

Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Imaging of Spinal Metastasis

Spinal metastasis is the most common malignant disease of the spine. Recently, major advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence technology have led to their increased use in oncological imaging. The purpose of this study is to review and summarise the present evidence for artificial intelligence applications in the detection, classification and management of spinal metastasis, along with their potential integration into clinical practice. A systematic, detailed search of the main electronic medical databases was undertaken in concordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 30 articles were retrieved from the database and reviewed. Key findings of current AI applications were compiled and summarised. The main clinical applications of AI techniques include image processing, diagnosis, decision support, treatment assistance and prognostic outcomes. In the realm of spinal oncology, artificial intelligence technologies have achieved relatively good performance and hold immense potential to aid clinicians, including enhancing work efficiency and reducing adverse events. Further research is required to validate the clinical performance of the AI tools and facilitate their integration into routine clinical practice.

Building and evaluating an artificial intelligence algorithm: A practical guide for practicing oncologists

The use of machine learning and deep learning has enabled many applications, previously thought of as being impossible. Among all medical fields, cancer care is arguably the most significantly impacted, with precision medicine now truly being a possibility. The effect of these technologies, loosely known as artificial intelligence, is particularly striking in fields involving images (such as radiology and pathology) and fields involving large amounts of data (such as genomics). Practicing oncologists are often confronted with new technologies claiming to predict response to therapy or predict the genomic make-up of patients. Underst-anding these new claims and technologies requires a deep understanding of the field. In this review, we provide an overview of the basis of deep learning. We describe various common tasks and their data requirements so that oncologists could be equipped to start such projects, as well as evaluate algorithms presented to them.

Towards a safe and efficient clinical implementation of machine learning in radiation oncology by exploring model interpretability, explainability and data-model dependency

The interest in machine learning (ML) has grown tremendously in recent years, partly due to the performance leap that occurred with new techniques of deep learning, convolutional neural networks for images, increased computational power, and wider availability of large datasets. Most fields of medicine follow that popular trend and, notably, radiation oncology is one of those that are at the forefront, with already a long tradition in using digital images and fully computerized workflows. ML models are driven by data, and in contrast with many statistical or physical models, they can be very large and complex, with countless generic parameters. This inevitably raises two questions, namely, the tight dependence between the models and the datasets that feed them, and the interpretability of the models, which scales with its complexity. Any problems in the data used to train the model will be later reflected in their performance. This, together with the low interpretability of ML models, makes their implementation into the clinical workflow particularly difficult. Building tools for risk assessment and quality assurance of ML models must involve then two main points: interpretability and data-model dependency. After a joint introduction of both radiation oncology and ML, this paper reviews the main risks and current solutions when applying the latter to workflows in the former. Risks associated with data and models, as well as their interaction, are detailed. Next, the core concepts of interpretability, explainability, and data-model dependency are formally defined and illustrated with examples. Afterwards, a broad discussion goes through key applications of ML in workflows of radiation oncology as well as vendors' perspectives for the clinical implementation of ML.

A reawakening of Machine Learning Application in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Future Research Motivation

Machine learning (ML) entails artificial procedures that improve robotically through experience and using data. Supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, and Reinforcement Learning (RL) are the main types of ML. This study mainly focuses on RL and Deep learning, since necessitates mainly sequential and consecutive decision-making context. This is a comparison to supervised and non-supervised learning due to the interactive nature of the environment. Exploiting a forthcoming accumulative compensation and its stimulus of machines, complex policy decisions. The study further analyses and presents ML perspectives depicting state-of-the-art developments with advancement, relatively depicting the future trend of RL based on its applicability in technology. It's a challenge to an Internet of Things (IoT) and demonstrates what possibly can be adopted as a solution. This study presented a summarized perspective on identified arenas on the analysis of RL. The study scrutinized that a reasonable number of the techniques engrossed in alternating policy values instead of modifying other gears in an exact state of intellectual. The study presented a strong foundation for the current studies to be adopted by the researchers from different research backgrounds to develop models, and architectures that are relevant.

Liver surgery for colorectal metastasis: New paths and new goals with the help of artificial intelligence

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common neoplasia with an high risk to metastatic spread. Improving medical and surgical treatment is moving along with improving the precision of diagnosis and patient's assessment, the latter two aided more and more with the use of artificial intelligence (AI). The management of colorectal liver metastasis is multidisciplinary, and surgery is the main option. After the diagnosis, a surgical assessment of the patient is fundamental. Reaching a R0 resection with a proper remnant liver volume can be done using new techniques involving also artificial intelligence. Considering the recent application of artificial intelligence as a valid substitute for liver biopsy in chronic liver diseases, several authors tried to apply similar techniques to pre-operative imaging of liver metastasis. Radiomics showed good results in identifying structural changes in a unhealthy liver and in evaluating the prognosis after a liver resection. Recently deep learning has been successfully applied in estimating the remnant liver volume before surgery. Moreover AI techniques can help surgeons to perform an early diagnosis of neoplastic relapse or a better differentiation between a colorectal metastasis and a benign lesion. AI could be applied also in the histopathological diagnostic tool. Although AI implementation is still partially automatized, it appears faster and more precise than the usual diagnostic tools and, in the short future, could become the new gold standard in liver surgery.

The application of artificial intelligence in hepatology: A systematic review

The integration of human and artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has only recently begun but it has already become obvious that intelligent systems can dramatically improve the management of liver diseases. Big data made it possible to envisage transformative developments of the use of AI for diagnosing, predicting prognosis and treating liver diseases, but there is still a lot of work to do. If we want to achieve the 21^st century digital revolution, there is an urgent need for specific national and international rules, and to adhere to bioethical parameters when collecting data. Avoiding misleading results is essential for the effective use of AI. A crucial question is whether it is possible to sustain, technically and morally, the process of integration between man and machine. We present a systematic review on the applications of AI to hepatology, highlighting the current challenges and crucial issues related to the use of such technologies.

Role of CT in Two-Stage Liver Surgery

Complete resection is the only potentially curative treatment for primary or metastatic liver tumors. Improvements in surgical techniques such as conventional two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) with portal vein embolization and ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) promote hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR), expanding resection criteria to include patients with widespread hepatic disease who were formerly not considered candidates for resection. Radiologists are essential in the multidisciplinary approach required for TSH. In particular, multidetector CT has a critical role throughout the various stages of this surgical process. The aims of CT before the first stage of TSH are to define the feasibility of surgery, assess the number and location of liver tumors in relation to relevant anatomy, and provide a detailed anatomic evaluation, including vascular and biliary variants. Volume calculation with CT is also essential to determine if the FLR is sufficient to avoid posthepatectomy liver failure. The objectives of CT between the first and second stages of TSH are to recalculate liver volumes (ie, assess FLR hypertrophy) and depict expected liver changes and complications that could modify the surgical plan or preclude the second stage of definitive resection. In this review, the importance of CT throughout different stages of TSH is discussed and key observations that contribute to surgical planning are highlighted. In addition, the advantages and limitations of MRI for detection of liver metastases and assessment of complications are briefly described. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Artificial Intelligence in hepatology, liver surgery and transplantation: Emerging applications and frontiers of research

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and augmented realities into the medical field is being attempted by various researchers across the globe. As a matter of fact, most of the advanced technologies utilized by medical providers today have been borrowed and extrapolated from other industries. The introduction of AI into the field of hepatology and liver surgery is relatively a recent phenomenon. The purpose of this narrative review is to highlight the different AI concepts which are currently being tried to improve the care of patients with liver diseases. We end with summarizing emerging trends and major challenges in the future development of AI in hepatology and liver surgery.

Fully automated segmentation in temporal bone CT with neural network: a preliminary assessment study

BACKGROUND

Segmentation of important structures in temporal bone CT is the basis of image-guided otologic surgery. Manual segmentation of temporal bone CT is time- consuming and laborious. We assessed the feasibility and generalization ability of a proposed deep learning model for automated segmentation of critical structures in temporal bone CT scans.

METHODS

Thirty-nine temporal bone CT volumes including 58 ears were divided into normal (n = 20) and abnormal groups (n = 38). Ossicular chain disruption (n = 10), facial nerve covering vestibular window (n = 10), and Mondini dysplasia (n = 18) were included in abnormal group. All facial nerves, auditory ossicles, and labyrinths of the normal group were manually segmented. For the abnormal group, aberrant structures were manually segmented. Temporal bone CT data were imported into the network in unmarked form. The Dice coefficient (DC) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) were used to evaluate the accuracy of automatic segmentation.

RESULTS

In the normal group, the mean values of DC and ASSD were respectively 0.703, and 0.250 mm for the facial nerve; 0.910, and 0.081 mm for the labyrinth; and 0.855, and 0.107 mm for the ossicles. In the abnormal group, the mean values of DC and ASSD were respectively 0.506, and 1.049 mm for the malformed facial nerve; 0.775, and 0.298 mm for the deformed labyrinth; and 0.698, and 1.385 mm for the aberrant ossicles.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model has good generalization ability, which highlights the promise of this approach for otologist education, disease diagnosis, and preoperative planning for image-guided otology surgery.

Fully automated whole-liver volume quantification on CT-image data: Comparison with manual volumetry using enhanced and unenhanced images as well as two different radiation dose levels and two reconstruction kernels

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of fully automated liver volume quantification vs. manual quantification using unenhanced as well as enhanced CT-image data as well as two different radiation dose levels and also two image reconstruction kernels.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The local ethics board gave its approval for retrospective data analysis. Automated liver volume quantification in 300 consecutive livers in 164 male and 103 female oncologic patients (64±12y) performed at our institution (between January 2020 and May 2020) using two different dual-energy helicals: portal-venous phase enhanced, ref. tube current 300mAs (CARE Dose4D) for tube A (100 kV) and ref. 232mAs tube current for tube B (Sn140kV), slice collimation 0.6mm, reconstruction kernel I30f/1, recon. thickness of 0.6mm and 5mm, 80-100 mL iodine contrast agent 350 mg/mL, (flow 2mL/s) and unenhanced ref. tube current 100mAs (CARE Dose4D) for tube A (100 kV) and ref. 77mAs tube current for tube B (Sn140kV), slice collimation 0.6mm (kernel Q40f) were analyzed. The post-processing tool (syngo.CT Liver Analysis) is already FDA-approved. Two resident radiologists with no and 1-year CT-experience performed both the automated measurements independently from each other. Results were compared with those of manual liver volume quantification using the same software which was supervised by a senior radiologist with 30-year CT-experience (ground truth).

RESULTS

In total, a correlation of 98% was obtained for liver volumetry based on enhanced and unenhanced data sets compared to the manual liver quantification. Radiologist #1 and #2 achieved an inter-reader agreement of 99.8% for manual liver segmentation (p<0.0001). Automated liver volumetry resulted in an overestimation (>5% deviation) of 3.7% for unenhanced CT-image data and 4.0% for contrast-enhanced CT-images. Underestimation (<5%) of liver volume was 2.0% for unenhanced CT-image data and 1.3% for enhanced images after automated liver volumetry. Number and distribution of erroneous volume measurements using either thin or thick slice reconstructions was exactly the same, both for the enhanced as well for the unenhanced image data sets (p> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Results of fully automated liver volume quantification are accurate and comparable with those of manual liver volume quantification and the technique seems to be confident even if unenhanced lower-dose CT image data is used.

Current Status of Radiomics and Deep Learning in Liver Imaging

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence is poised to revolutionize medical image. It takes advantage of the high-dimensional quantitative features present in medical images that may not be fully appreciated by humans. Artificial intelligence has the potential to facilitate automatic organ segmentation, disease detection and characterization, and prediction of disease recurrence. This article reviews the current status of artificial intelligence in liver imaging and reviews the opportunities and challenges in clinical implementation.

The overview of the deep learning integrated into the medical imaging of liver: a review

Deep learning (DL) is a recently developed artificial intelligent method that can be integrated into numerous fields. For the imaging diagnosis of liver disease, several remarkable outcomes have been achieved with the application of DL currently. This advanced algorithm takes part in various sections of imaging processing such as liver segmentation, lesion delineation, disease classification, process optimization, etc. The DL optimized imaging diagnosis shows a broad prospect instead of the pathological biopsy for the advantages of convenience, safety, and inexpensiveness. In this paper, we reviewed the published representative DL-related hepatic imaging works, described the general situation of this new-rising technology in medical liver imaging and explored the future direction of DL development.

Automated Detection of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions on CT Using Deep Learning

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are a frequent and underreported incidental finding on CT scans and can transform into neoplasms with devastating consequences. We developed and evaluated an algorithm based on a two-step nnU-Net architecture for automated detection of PCL on CTs. A total of 543 cysts on 221 abdominal CTs were manually segmented in 3D by a radiology resident in consensus with a board-certified radiologist specialized in abdominal radiology. This information was used to train a two-step nnU-Net for detection with the performance assessed depending on lesions' volume and location in comparison to three human readers of varying experience. Mean sensitivity was 78.8 ± 0.1%. The sensitivity was highest for large lesions with 87.8% for cysts ≥220 mm³ and for lesions in the distal pancreas with up to 96.2%. The number of false-positive detections for cysts ≥220 mm³ was 0.1 per case. The algorithm's performance was comparable to human readers. To conclude, automated detection of PCL on CTs is feasible. The proposed model could serve radiologists as a second reading tool. All imaging data and code used in this study are freely available online.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review

Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently become a very popular buzzword, as a consequence of disruptive technical advances and impressive experimental results, notably in the field of image analysis and processing. In medicine, specialties where images are central, like radiology, pathology or oncology, have seized the opportunity and considerable efforts in research and development have been deployed to transfer the potential of AI to clinical applications. With AI becoming a more mainstream tool for typical medical imaging analysis tasks, such as diagnosis, segmentation, or classification, the key for a safe and efficient use of clinical AI applications relies, in part, on informed practitioners. The aim of this review is to present the basic technological pillars of AI, together with the state-of-the-art machine learning methods and their application to medical imaging. In addition, we discuss the new trends and future research directions. This will help the reader to understand how AI methods are now becoming an ubiquitous tool in any medical image analysis workflow and pave the way for the clinical implementation of AI-based solutions.

Building Large-Scale Quantitative Imaging Databases with Multi-Scale Deep Reinforcement Learning: Initial Experience with Whole-Body Organ Volumetric Analyses

To explore the feasibility of a fully automated workflow for whole-body volumetric analyses based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and to investigate the influence of contrast-phase (CP) and slice thickness (ST) on the calculated organ volume. This retrospective study included 431 multiphasic CT datasets—including three CP and two ST reconstructions for abdominal organs—totaling 10,508 organ volumes (10,344 abdominal organ volumes: liver, spleen, and kidneys, 164 lung volumes). Whole-body organ volumes were determined using multi-scale DRL for 3D anatomical landmark detection and 3D organ segmentation. Total processing time for all volumes and mean calculation time per case were recorded. Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were conducted to test for robustness considering CP and ST. The algorithm calculated organ volumes for the liver, spleen, and right and left kidney (mean volumes in milliliter (interquartile range), portal venous CP, 5 mm ST: 1868.6 (1426.9, 2157.8), 350.19 (45.46, 395.26), 186.30 (147.05, 214.99) and 181.91 (143.22, 210.35), respectively), and for the right and left lung (2363.1 (1746.3, 2851.3) and 1950.9 (1335.2, 2414.2)). We found no statistically significant effects of the variable contrast phase or the variable slice thickness on the organ volumes. Mean computational time per case was 10 seconds. The evaluated approach, using state-of-the art DRL, enables a fast processing of substantial amounts irrespective of CP and ST, allowing building up organ-specific volumetric databases. The thus derived volumes may serve as reference for quantitative imaging follow-up.