Systematic review of sarcomas radiomics studies: Bridging the gap between concepts and clinical applications?

Relative Wash-In Rate in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a New Prognostic Biomarker for Event-Free Survival in 82 Patients with Osteosarcoma: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The decreased perfusion of osteosarcoma in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, reflecting a good histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, has been described.

PURPOSE

In this study, we aim to explore the potential of the relative wash-in rate as a prognostic factor for event-free survival (EFS).

METHODS

Skeletal high-grade osteosarcoma patients, treated in two tertiary referral centers between 2005 and 2022, were retrospectively included. The relative wash-in rate (rWIR) was determined with DCE-MRI before, after, or during the second cycle of chemotherapy (pre-resection). A previously determined cut-off was used to categorize patients, where rWIR < 2.3 was considered poor and rWIR ≥ 2.3 a good radiological response. EFS was defined as the time from resection to the first event: local recurrence, new metastases, or tumor-related death. EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier's methodology. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the effect of histological response and rWIR on EFS, adjusted for traditional prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients (median age: 17 years; IQR: 14-28) were included. The median follow-up duration was 11.8 years (95% CI: 11.0-12.7). During follow-up, 33 events occurred. Poor histological response was not significantly associated with EFS (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 0.9-3.8), whereas a poor radiological response was associated with a worse EFS (HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.0). In a subpopulation without initial metastases, the binary assessment of rWIR approached statistical significance (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.0-5.2), whereas its continuous evaluation demonstrated a significant association between higher rWIR and improved EFS (HR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9), underlining the effect of response to chemotherapy. The 2- and 5-year EFS for patients with a rWIR ≥ 2.3 were 85% and 75% versus 55% and 50% for patients with a rWIR < 2.3.

CONCLUSION

The predicted poor chemo response with MRI (rWIR < 2.3) is associated with shorter EFS even when adjusted for known clinical covariates and shows similar results to histological response evaluation. rWIR is a potential tool for future response-based individualized healthcare in osteosarcoma patients before surgical resection.

Advancing Pediatric Sarcomas through Radiomics: A Systematic Review and Prospective Assessment Using Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and Methodological Radiomics Score (METRICS)

Pediatric sarcomas, rare malignancies of mesenchymal origin, pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. In this review, we explore the role of radiomics in reshaping our understanding of pediatric sarcomas, emphasizing methodological considerations and applications such as diagnostics and predictive modeling. A systematic review conducted up to November 2023 identified 72 papers on radiomics analysis in pediatric sarcoma from PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and Scopus. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 reports were included in this review. The studies, predominantly retrospective, focus on Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma, utilizing diverse imaging modalities, including CT, MRI, PET/CT, and PET/MRI. Manual segmentation is common, with a median of 35 features extracted. Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and Methodological Radiomics Score (METRICS) assessments reveal a consistent emphasis on non-radiomic features, validation criteria, and improved methodological rigor in recent publications. Diagnostic applications dominate, with innovative studies exploring prognostic and treatment response aspects. Challenges include feature heterogeneity and sample size variations. The evolving landscape underscores the need for standardized methodologies. Despite challenges, the diagnostic and predictive potential of radiomics in pediatric oncology is evident, paving the way for precision medicine advancements.

Radiomics in Musculoskeletal Tumors

Sarcomas are heterogeneous rare tumors predominantly affecting the musculoskeletal (MSK) system. Due to significant variations in their natural history and variable response to conventional treatments, the discovery of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers to guide therapeutic decision-making is an active and ongoing field of research. As new cellular, molecular, and metabolic biomarkers continue to be discovered, quantitative radiologic imaging is becoming increasingly important in sarcoma management. Radiomics offers the potential for discovering novel imaging diagnostic and predictive biomarkers using standard-of-care medical imaging. In this review, we detail the core concepts of radiomics and the application of radiomics to date in MSK sarcoma research. Also described are specific challenges related to radiomic studies, as well as viewpoints on clinical adoption and future perspectives in the field.

Radiomics and artificial intelligence for soft-tissue sarcomas: Current status and perspectives

This article proposes a summary of the current status of the research regarding the use of radiomics and artificial intelligence to improve the radiological assessment of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), a heterogeneous group of rare and ubiquitous mesenchymal malignancies. After a first part explaining the principle of radiomics approaches, from raw image post-processing to extraction of radiomics features mined with unsupervised and supervised machine-learning algorithms, and the current research involving deep learning algorithms in STS, especially convolutional neural networks, this review details their main research developments since the formalisation of 'radiomics' in oncologic imaging in 2010. This review focuses on CT and MRI and does not involve ultrasonography. Radiomics and deep radiomics have been successfully applied to develop predictive models to discriminate between benign soft-tissue tumors and STS, to predict the histologic grade (i.e., the most important prognostic marker of STS), the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and the patients' survivals and probability for presenting distant metastases. The main findings, limitations and expectations are discussed for each of these outcomes. Overall, after a first decade of publications emphasizing the potential of radiomics through retrospective proof-of-concept studies, almost all positive but with heterogeneous and often non-replicable methods, radiomics is now at a turning point in order to provide robust demonstrations of its clinical impact through open-science, independent databases, and application of good and standardized practices in radiomics such as those provided by the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative, without forgetting innovative research paths involving other '-omics' data to better understand the relationships between imaging of STS, gene-expression profiles and tumor microenvironment.

A CT-based radiomics classification model for the prediction of histological type and tumour grade in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RADSARC-R): a retrospective multicohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are tumours with a poor prognosis. Upfront characterisation of the tumour is difficult, and under-grading is common. Radiomics has the potential to non-invasively characterise the so-called radiological phenotype of tumours. We aimed to develop and independently validate a CT-based radiomics classification model for the prediction of histological type and grade in retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma.

METHODS

A retrospective discovery cohort was collated at our centre (Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK) and an independent validation cohort comprising patients recruited in the phase 3 STRASS study of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma. Patients aged older than 18 years with confirmed primary leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma proceeding to surgical resection with available contrast-enhanced CT scans were included. Using the discovery dataset, a CT-based radiomics workflow was developed, including manual delineation, sub-segmentation, feature extraction, and predictive model building. Separate probabilistic classifiers for the prediction of histological type and low versus intermediate or high grade tumour types were built and tested. Independent validation was then performed. The primary objective of the study was to develop radiomic classification models for the prediction of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma type and histological grade.

FINDINGS

170 patients recruited between Oct 30, 2016, and Dec 23, 2020, were eligible in the discovery cohort and 89 patients recruited between Jan 18, 2012, and April 10, 2017, were eligible in the validation cohort. In the discovery cohort, the median age was 63 years (range 27-89), with 83 (49%) female and 87 (51%) male patients. In the validation cohort, median age was 59 years (range 33-77), with 46 (52%) female and 43 (48%) male patients. The highest performing model for the prediction of histological type had an area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 0·928 on validation, based on a feature set of radiomics and approximate radiomic volume fraction. The highest performing model for the prediction of histological grade had an AUROC of 0·882 on validation, based on a radiomics feature set.

INTERPRETATION

Our validated radiomics model can predict the histological type and grade of retroperitoneal sarcomas with excellent performance. This could have important implications for improving diagnosis and risk stratification in retroperitoneal sarcomas.

FUNDING

Wellcome Trust, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group, the National Institutes for Health, and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research.

The gap before real clinical application of imaging-based machine-learning and radiomic models for chemoradiation outcome prediction in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Due to tumoral heterogeneity and the lack of robust biomarkers, the prediction of chemoradiotherapy response and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) is challenging. The goal of this study was to assess the study quality and clinical value of machine learning and radiomic-based quantitative imaging studies for predicting the outcomes of EC patients after chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for eligible articles. The methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS), Image Biomarkers Standardization Initiative (IBSI) Guideline, and Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement, as well as the modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. A meta-analysis of the evidence focusing on predicting chemoradiotherapy response and outcome in EC patients was implemented.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies were eligible for qualitative synthesis. The mean RQS score was 9.07, with an adherence rate of 42.52%. The adherence rates of the TRIPOD and IBSI were 61.70 and 43.17%, respectively. Ultimately, 24 studies were included in the meta-analysis, of which 16 studies had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (0.76-0.89), 0.83 (0.79-0.86), and 0.84 (0.81-0.87) in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy datasets, as well as 0.84 (0.75-0.93), 0.89 (0.83-0.93), and 0.93 (0.90-0.95) in definitive chemoradiotherapy datasets, respectively. Moreover, radiomics could distinguish patients from the low-risk and high-risk groups with different disease-free survival (DFS) (pooled hazard ratio: 3.43, 95% CI 2.39-4.92) and overall survival (pooled hazard ratio: 2.49, 95% CI 1.91-3.25). The results of subgroup and regression analyses showed that some of the heterogeneity was explained by the combination with clinical factors, sample size, and usage of the deep learning (DL) signature.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive radiomics offers promising potential for optimizing treatment decision-making in EC patients. However, it is necessary to make scientific advancements in EC radiomics regarding reproducibility, clinical usefulness analysis, and open science categories. Improved model reporting of study objectives, blind assessment, and image processing steps are required to help promote real clinical applications of radiomics in EC research.

A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers

PURPOSE

To systematically assess the quality of radiomics research in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) and to test the feasibility of analysis at the level of radiomics feature.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data to identify articles of GCTB radiomics until 31 July 2022. The studies were assessed by radiomics quality score (RQS), transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement, checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM), and modified quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The radiomic features selected for model development were documented.

RESULTS

Nine articles were included. The average of the ideal percentage of RQS, the TRIPOD adherence rate and the CLAIM adherence rate were 26%, 56%, and 57%, respectively. The risk of bias and applicability concerns were mainly related to the index test. The shortness in external validation and open science were repeatedly emphasized. In GCTB radiomics models, the gray level co-occurrence matrix features (40%), first order features (28%), and gray-level run-length matrix features (18%) were most selected features out of all reported features. However, none of the individual feature has appeared repeatably in multiple studies. It is not possible to meta-analyze radiomics features at present.

CONCLUSION

The quality of GCTB radiomics studies is suboptimal. The reporting of individual radiomics feature data is encouraged. The analysis at the level of radiomics feature has potential to generate more practicable evidence for translating radiomics into clinical application.

Development and Evaluation of MR-Based Radiogenomic Models to Differentiate Atypical Lipomatous Tumors from Lipomas

Background: The aim of this study was to develop and validate radiogenomic models to predict the MDM2 gene amplification status and differentiate between ALTs and lipomas on preoperative MR images. Methods: MR images were obtained in 257 patients diagnosed with ALTs (n = 65) or lipomas (n = 192) using histology and the MDM2 gene analysis as a reference standard. The protocols included T2-, T1-, and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences. Additionally, 50 patients were obtained from a different hospital for external testing. Radiomic features were selected using mRMR. Using repeated nested cross-validation, the machine-learning models were trained on radiomic features and demographic information. For comparison, the external test set was evaluated by three radiology residents and one attending radiologist. Results: A LASSO classifier trained on radiomic features from all sequences performed best, with an AUC of 0.88, 70% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 76% accuracy. In comparison, the radiology residents achieved 60–70% accuracy, 55–80% sensitivity, and 63–77% specificity, while the attending radiologist achieved 90% accuracy, 96% sensitivity, and 87% specificity. Conclusion: A radiogenomic model combining features from multiple MR sequences showed the best performance in predicting the MDM2 gene amplification status. The model showed a higher accuracy compared to the radiology residents, though lower compared to the attending radiologist.

Systematic review of the radiomics quality score applications: an EuSoMII Radiomics Auditing Group Initiative

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of the present systematic review was a comprehensive overview of the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS)-based systematic reviews to highlight common issues and challenges of radiomics research application and evaluate the relationship between RQS and review features.

METHODS

The literature search was performed on multiple medical literature archives according to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews that reported radiomic quality assessment through the RQS. Reported scores were converted to a 0-100% scale. The Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare RQS scores and review features.

RESULTS

The literature research yielded 345 articles, from which 44 systematic reviews were finally included in the analysis. Overall, the median of RQS was 21.00% (IQR = 11.50). No significant differences of RQS were observed in subgroup analyses according to targets (oncological/not oncological target, neuroradiology/body imaging focus and one imaging technique/more than one imaging technique, characterization/prognosis/detection/other).

CONCLUSIONS

Our review did not reveal a significant difference of quality of radiomic articles reported in systematic reviews, divided in different subgroups. Furthermore, low overall methodological quality of radiomics research was found independent of specific application domains. While the RQS can serve as a reference tool to improve future study designs, future research should also be aimed at improving its reliability and developing new tools to meet an ever-evolving research space.

KEY POINTS

• Radiomics is a promising high-throughput method that may generate novel imaging biomarkers to improve clinical decision-making process, but it is an inherently complex analysis and often lacks reproducibility and generalizability. • The Radiomics Quality Score serves a necessary role as the de facto reference tool for assessing radiomics studies. • External auditing of radiomics studies, in addition to the standard peer-review process, is valuable to highlight common limitations and provide insights to improve future study designs and practical applicability of the radiomics models.

Role of Imaging in Initial Prognostication of Locally Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Although imaging is central in the initial staging of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), it remains underused and few radiological features are currently used in practice for prognostication and to help guide the best therapeutic strategy. Yet, several prognostic qualitative and quantitative characteristics from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been identified over these last decades.

OBJECTIVE

After an overview of the current validated prognostic features based on baseline imaging and their integration into prognostic tools, such as nomograms used by clinicians, the aim of this review is to summarize more complex and innovative MRI, PET, and radiomics features, and to highlight their role to predict indirectly (through histologic grade) or directly the patients' outcomes.

A systematic review of radiomics in chondrosarcoma: assessment of study quality and clinical value needs handy tools

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the study quality and clinical value of radiomics studies on chondrosarcoma.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data were searched for articles on radiomics for evaluating chondrosarcoma as of January 31, 2022. The study quality was assessed according to Radiomics Quality Score (RQS), Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist, Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI) guideline, and modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The level of evidence supporting clinical use of radiomics on chondrosarcoma differential diagnosis was determined based on meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included. The median RQS was 10.5 (range, -3 to 15), with an adherence rate of 36%. The adherence rate was extremely low in domains of high-level evidence (0%), open science and data (17%), and imaging and segmentation (35%). The adherence rate of the TRIPOD checklist was 61%, and low for section of title and abstract (13%), introduction (42%), and results (56%). The reporting rate of pre-processing steps according to the IBSI guideline was 60%. The risk of bias and concern of application were mainly related to the index test. The meta-analysis on differential diagnosis of enchondromas vs. chondrosarcomas showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 43.90 (95% confidential interval, 25.33-76.10), which was rated as weak evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The current scientific and reporting quality of radiomics studies on chondrosarcoma was insufficient. Radiomics has potential in facilitating the optimization of operation decision-making in chondrosarcoma.

KEY POINTS

• Among radiomics studies on chondrosarcoma, although differential diagnostic models showed promising performance, only pieces of weak level of evidence were reached with insufficient study quality. • Since the RQS rating, the TRIPOD checklist, and the IBSI guideline have largely overlapped with each other, it is necessary to establish one widely acceptable methodological and reporting guideline for radiomics research. • The TRIPOD model typing, the phase classification of image mining studies, and the level of evidence category are useful tools to assess the gap between academic research and clinical application, although their modifications for radiomics studies are needed.

Predicting Soft Tissue Sarcoma Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using an MRI-Based Delta-Radiomics Approach

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of machine learning-augmented MRI-based radiomics models for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in soft tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

Forty-four subjects were identified retrospectively from patients who received NAC at our institution for pathologically proven soft tissue sarcomas. Only subjects who had both a baseline MRI prior to initiating chemotherapy and a post-treatment scan at least 2 months after initiating chemotherapy and prior to surgical resection were included. 3D ROIs were used to delineate whole-tumor volumes on pre- and post-treatment scans, from which 1708 radiomics features were extracted. Delta-radiomics features were calculated by subtraction of baseline from post-treatment values and used to distinguish treatment response through univariate analyses as well as machine learning-augmented radiomics analyses.

RESULTS

Though only 4.74% of variables overall reached significance at p ≤ 0.05 in univariate analyses, Laws Texture Energy (LTE)-derived metrics represented 46.04% of all such features reaching statistical significance. ROC analyses similarly failed to predict NAC response, with AUCs of 0.40 (95% CI 0.22-0.58) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.26-0.62) for RF and AdaBoost, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Overall, while our result was not able to separate NAC responders from non-responders, our analyses did identify a subset of LTE-derived metrics that show promise for further investigations. Future studies will likely benefit from larger sample size constructions so as to avoid the need for data filtering and feature selection techniques, which have the potential to significantly bias the machine learning procedures.

Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal oncology imaging: A critical review of current applications

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being studied in musculoskeletal oncology imaging. AI has been applied to both primary and secondary bone tumors and assessed for various predictive tasks that include detection, segmentation, classification, and prognosis. Still, in the field of clinical research, further efforts are needed to improve AI reproducibility and reach an acceptable level of evidence in musculoskeletal oncology. This review describes the basic principles of the most common AI techniques, including machine learning, deep learning and radiomics. Then, recent developments and current results of AI in the field of musculoskeletal oncology are presented. Finally, limitations and future perspectives of AI in this field are discussed.

Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Evaluation of Soft Tissue Tumors and Correlation with Pathology Parameters

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) parameters in evaluating the biological behavior of soft tissue tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed DCE-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters in 78 patients with pathology-confirmed soft tissue tumors. A total of 78 patients had undergone DCE-MRI examination, while 24 patients with malignant soft tissue tumor had undergone ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examination. Microvessel density (MVD) and the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) were detected using immunohistochemistry. Differences in parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, MVD, and Ki-67 LI) between benign and malignant tumors were compared. Differences in parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, MVD, and SUV_max) between high- and low-proliferation malignant tumors (grouped by Ki-67 LI) were compared. Correlation of the DCE-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters with MVD and Ki-67 LI was analyzed.

RESULTS

Only the Ktrans, Kep, MVD, and Ki-67 LI differed significantly between the benign and malignant soft tissue tumors (all p < 0.001). Only Kep (p = 0.033) and SUV_max (p = 0.001) differed significantly between high- and low-proliferation malignant soft tissue tumors. Ktrans, Kep, and SUV_max correlated positively with MVD (r = 0.805, 0.778, 0.730, respectively; all p < 0.001), and with Ki-67 LI (r = 0.721, 0.685, 0.655, respectively; all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DCE-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters indicate soft tissue tumor biological behavior and can be used to differentiate between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors and between high- and low-proliferation malignant soft tissue tumors.

Concordance of histopathological and radiological grading in soft tissue sarcomas

Aim: The grade of the tumor is essential for planning the treatment strategy in soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). The goal of this study is to determine magnetic resonance imaging features related to histopathological grade and aggressiveness of STS. Material and Method: This retrospective single-center study involved preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI examinations of 64 patients with STS. MRI findings evaluated were; heterogeneity, necrosis, hemorrhage, and relationship with surrounding tissue in T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), and T1W post-contrast sequences of the lesion. Histological grade was determined with the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) grading system, and the aggressiveness of the lesion was measured with the Ki-67 index. Results: Sixty-four patients (mean age 45.5±21.6, M/F ratio 34/30) with STS were included. 33 (51.6%) patients graded as FNCLCC grade 3. On MRI examinations, the absence of necrosis was significantly associated with FNCLCC grade 1 and a low Ki-67 index (p

Prediction tools for the personalized management of soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity

Prediction tools are instruments which are commonly used to estimate the prognosis in oncology and facilitate clinical decision-making in a more personalized manner. Their popularity is shown by the increasing numbers of prediction tools, which have been described in the medical literature. Many of these tools have been shown to be useful in the field of soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities (eSTS). In this annotation, we aim to provide an overview of the available prediction tools for eSTS, provide an approach for clinicians to evaluate the performance and usefulness of the available tools for their own patients, and discuss their possible applications in the management of patients with an eSTS.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(9):1011-1016.

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders and Radiomics: Systematic review and quality appraisal

PURPOSE

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are the imaging modalities of choice for placenta accrete spectrum (PAS) disorders assessment. Radiomics could further increase the value of medical images and allow to overcome the limitations linked to their visual assessment. Aim of this systematic review was to identify and appraise the methodological quality of radiomics studies focused PAS disorders applications.

METHOD

Three online databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched to identify original research articles on human subjects published in English. For the qualitative synthesis of results, data regarding study design (e.g., retrospective or prospective), purpose, patient population (e.g., sample size), imaging modalities and radiomics pipelines (e.g., segmentation and feature extraction strategy) were collected. The appraisal of methodological quality was performed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS).

RESULTS

10 articles were finally included and analyzed. All were retrospective and MRI-powered. The majority included more than 100 patients (6/10). Four were prognostic (focused on either the prediction of bleeding volume or the prediction of needed management) while six diagnostic (PAS vs not PAS classification) studies. The median RQS was 8, with maximum and minimum respectively equal to 17/36 and - 6/36. Major methodological concerns were the lack of feature stability to multiple segmentation testing and poor data openness.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics studies focused on PAS disorders showed a heterogeneous methodological quality, overall lower than desirable. Furthermore, many relevant research questions remain unexplored. More robust investigations are needed to foster advancements in the field and possibly clinical translation.

An updated systematic review of radiomics in osteosarcoma: utilizing CLAIM to adapt the increasing trend of deep learning application in radiomics

Objective

To update the systematic review of radiomics in osteosarcoma.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data were searched to identify articles on osteosarcoma radiomics until May 15, 2022. The studies were assessed by Radiomics Quality Score (RQS), Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement, Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM), and modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The evidence supporting radiomics application for osteosarcoma was rated according to meta-analysis results.

Results

Twenty-nine articles were included. The average of the ideal percentage of RQS, the TRIPOD adherence rate and the CLAIM adherence rate were 29.2%, 59.2%, and 63.7%, respectively. RQS identified a radiomics-specific issue of phantom study. TRIPOD addressed deficiency in blindness of assessment. CLAIM and TRIPOD both pointed out shortness in missing data handling and sample size or power calculation. CLAIM identified extra disadvantages in data de-identification and failure analysis. External validation and open science were emphasized by all the above three tools. The risk of bias and applicability concerns were mainly related to the index test. The meta-analysis of radiomics predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response by MRI presented a diagnostic odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 28.83 (10.27–80.95) on testing datasets and was rated as weak evidence.

Conclusions

The quality of osteosarcoma radiomics studies is insufficient. More investigation is needed before using radiomics to optimize osteosarcoma treatment. CLAIM is recommended to guide the design and reporting of radiomics research.

Soft Tissue Sarcomas: The Role of Quantitative MRI in Treatment Response Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Although curative surgery remains the cornerstone of the therapeutic strategy in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (NART and NACT, respectively) are increasingly used to improve operability, surgical margins and patient outcome. The best imaging modality for locoregional assessment of STS is MRI but these tumors are mostly evaluated in a qualitative manner.

OBJECTIVE

After an overview of the current standard of care regarding treatment for patients with locally advanced STS, this review aims to summarize the principles and limitations of (i) the current methods used to evaluate response to neoadjuvant treatment in clinical practice and clinical trials in STS (RECIST 1.1 and modified Choi criteria), (ii) quantitative MRI sequences (i.e., diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI), and (iii) texture analyses and (delta-) radiomics.

Gaps and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence Applications for Pediatric Oncology in European Research: A Systematic Review of Reviews and a Bibliometric Analysis

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) systems is emerging in many fields in recent years, due to the increased computing power available at lower cost. Although its applications in various branches of medicine, such as pediatric oncology, are many and promising, its use is still in an embryonic stage. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the state of the art regarding the AI application in pediatric oncology, through a systematic review of systematic reviews, and to analyze current trends in Europe, through a bibliometric analysis of publications written by European authors. Among 330 records found, 25 were included in the systematic review. All papers have been published since 2017, demonstrating only recent attention to this field. The total number of studies included in the selected reviews was 674, with a third including an author with a European affiliation. In bibliometric analysis, 304 out of the 978 records found were included. Similarly, the number of publications began to dramatically increase from 2017. Most explored AI applications regard the use of diagnostic images, particularly radiomics, as well as the group of neoplasms most involved are the central nervous system tumors. No evidence was found regarding the use of AI for process mining, clinical pathway modeling, or computer interpreted guidelines to improve the healthcare process. No robust evidence is yet available in any of the domains investigated by systematic reviews. However, the scientific production in Europe is significant and consistent with the topics covered in systematic reviews at the global level. The use of AI in pediatric oncology is developing rapidly with promising results, but numerous gaps and challenges persist to validate its utilization in clinical practice. An important limitation is the need for large datasets for training algorithms, calling for international collaborative studies.

Quality assessment of radiomics research in cardiac CT: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the quality of current radiomics research on cardiac CT using radiomics quality score (RQS) and Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) systems.

METHODS

Systematic searches of PubMed and EMBASE were performed to identify all potentially relevant original research articles about cardiac CT radiomics. Fifteen original research articles were selected. Two cardiac radiologists assessed the quality of the methodology adopted in those studies according to the RQS and TRIPOD guidelines. Basic adherence rates for the following six key domains were evaluated: image protocol and reproducibility, feature reduction and validation, biologic/clinical utility, performance index, high level of evidence, and open science.

RESULTS

Among the 15 included articles, six (40%) were about coronary artery disease and six (40%) were about myocardial infarction. The mean RQS was 9.9 ± 7.3 (27.4% of the ideal score of 36), and the basic adherence rate was 44.6%. Fourteen (93.3%) and nine (60%) studies performed feature selection and validation, but only two (13.3%) of them performed external validation. Two studies (13.3%) were prospective, and only one study (6.7%) conducted calibration analysis and stated the potential clinical utility. None of the studies conducted phantom study and cost-effective analysis. The overall adherence rate for TRIPOD was 63%.

CONCLUSION

The quality of radiomics studies in cardiac CT is currently insufficient. A higher level of evidence is required, and analysis of clinical utility and calibration of model performance need to be improved.

KEY POINTS

• The quality of science of radiomics studies in cardiac CT is currently insufficient. • No study conducted a phantom study or cost-effective analysis, with further limitations being demonstrated in a high level of evidence for radiomics studies. • Analysis of clinical utility and calibration of model performance need to be improved, and a higher level of evidence is required.

Quality of science and reporting for radiomics in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the quality of radiomics studies using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) according to the radiomics quality score (RQS), Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines, and the standards defined by the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI) and identify areas needing improvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched to identify radiomics studies using CMR until March 10, 2021. Of the 259 identified articles, 32 relevant original research articles were included. Studies were scored according to the RQS, TRIPOD guidelines, and IBSI standards by two cardiac radiologists.

RESULTS

The mean RQS was 14.3% of the maximum (5.16 out of 36). RQS were low for the demonstration of validation (-60.6%), calibration statistics (1.6%), potential clinical utility (3.1%), and open science (3.1%) items. No study conducted a phantom study or cost-effectiveness analysis. The adherence to TRIPOD guidelines was 55.9%. Studies were deficient in reporting title (3.1%), stating objective in abstract and introduction (6.3% and 9.4%), missing data (0%), discrimination/calibration (3.1%), and how to use the prediction model (3.1%). According to the IBSI standards, non-uniformity correction, image interpolation, grey-level discretization, and signal intensity normalization were performed in two (6.3%), four (12.5%), six (18.8%), and twelve (37.5%) studies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The quality of radiomics studies using CMR is suboptimal. Improvements are needed in the areas of validation, calibration, clinical utility, and open science. Complete reporting of study objectives, missing data, discrimination/calibration, how to use the prediction model, and preprocessing steps are necessary.

KEY POINTS

• The quality of science in radiomics studies using CMR is currently inadequate. • RQS were low for validation, calibration, clinical utility, and open science; no study conducted a phantom study or cost-effectiveness analysis. • In stating the study objective, missing data, discrimination/calibration, how to use the prediction model, and preprocessing steps, improvements are needed.

Radiomics of Musculoskeletal Sarcomas: A Narrative Review

Bone and soft-tissue primary malignant tumors or sarcomas are a large, diverse group of mesenchymal-derived malignancies. They represent a model for intra- and intertumoral heterogeneities, making them particularly suitable for radiomics analyses. Radiomic features offer information on cancer phenotype as well as the tumor microenvironment which, combined with other pertinent data such as genomics and proteomics and correlated with outcomes data, can produce accurate, robust, evidence-based, clinical-decision support systems. Our purpose in this narrative review is to offer an overview of radiomics studies dealing with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based radiomics models of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas that could help distinguish different histotypes, low-grade from high-grade sarcomas, predict response to multimodality therapy, and thus better tailor patients’ treatments and finally improve their survivals. Although showing promising results, interobserver segmentation variability, feature reproducibility, and model validation are three main challenges of radiomics that need to be addressed in order to translate radiomics studies to clinical applications. These efforts, together with a better knowledge and application of the “Radiomics Quality Score” and Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative reporting guidelines, could improve the quality of sarcoma radiomics studies and facilitate radiomics towards clinical translation.

Artificial intelligence applied to musculoskeletal oncology: a systematic review

Developments in artificial intelligence have the potential to improve the care of patients with musculoskeletal tumors. We performed a systematic review of the published scientific literature to identify the current state of the art of artificial intelligence applied to musculoskeletal oncology, including both primary and metastatic tumors, and across the radiology, nuclear medicine, pathology, clinical research, and molecular biology literature. Through this search, we identified 252 primary research articles, of which 58 used deep learning and 194 used other machine learning techniques. Articles involving deep learning have mostly involved bone scintigraphy, histopathology, and radiologic imaging. Articles involving other machine learning techniques have mostly involved transcriptomic analyses, radiomics, and clinical outcome prediction models using medical records. These articles predominantly present proof-of-concept work, other than the automated bone scan index for bone metastasis quantification, which has translated to clinical workflows in some regions. We systematically review and discuss this literature, highlight opportunities for multidisciplinary collaboration, and identify potentially clinically useful topics with a relative paucity of research attention. Musculoskeletal oncology is an inherently multidisciplinary field, and future research will need to integrate and synthesize noisy siloed data from across clinical, imaging, and molecular datasets. Building the data infrastructure for collaboration will help to accelerate progress towards making artificial intelligence truly useful in musculoskeletal oncology.

Quality assessment standards in artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews: a meta-research study

Artificial intelligence (AI) centred diagnostic systems are increasingly recognised as robust solutions in healthcare delivery pathways. In turn, there has been a concurrent rise in secondary research studies regarding these technologies in order to influence key clinical and policymaking decisions. It is therefore essential that these studies accurately appraise methodological quality and risk of bias within shortlisted trials and reports. In order to assess whether this critical step is performed, we undertook a meta-research study evaluating adherence to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool within AI diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews. A literature search was conducted on all studies published from 2000 to December 2020. Of 50 included reviews, 36 performed the quality assessment, of which 27 utilised the QUADAS-2 tool. Bias was reported across all four domains of QUADAS-2. Two hundred forty-three of 423 studies (57.5%) across all systematic reviews utilising QUADAS-2 reported a high or unclear risk of bias in the patient selection domain, 110 (26%) reported a high or unclear risk of bias in the index test domain, 121 (28.6%) in the reference standard domain and 157 (37.1%) in the flow and timing domain. This study demonstrates the incomplete uptake of quality assessment tools in reviews of AI-based diagnostic accuracy studies and highlights inconsistent reporting across all domains of quality assessment. Poor standards of reporting act as barriers to clinical implementation. The creation of an AI-specific extension for quality assessment tools of diagnostic accuracy AI studies may facilitate the safe translation of AI tools into clinical practice.

Quality of Radiomics Research on Brain Metastasis: A Roadmap to Promote Clinical Translation

Objective

Our study aimed to evaluate the quality of radiomics studies on brain metastases based on the radiomics quality score (RQS), Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklist, and the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI) guidelines.

Materials and Methods

PubMed MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched for articles on radiomics for evaluating brain metastases, published until February 2021. Of the 572 articles, 29 relevant original research articles were included and evaluated according to the RQS, TRIPOD checklist, and IBSI guidelines.

Results

External validation was performed in only three studies (10.3%). The median RQS was 3.0 (range, -6 to 12), with a low basic adherence rate of 50.0%. The adherence rate was low in comparison to the “gold standard” (10.3%), stating the potential clinical utility (10.3%), performing the cut-off analysis (3.4%), reporting calibration statistics (6.9%), and providing open science and data (3.4%). None of the studies involved test-retest or phantom studies, prospective studies, or cost-effectiveness analyses. The overall rate of adherence to the TRIPOD checklist was 60.3% and low for reporting title (3.4%), blind assessment of outcome (0%), description of the handling of missing data (0%), and presentation of the full prediction model (0%). The majority of studies lacked pre-processing steps, with bias-field correction, isovoxel resampling, skull stripping, and gray-level discretization performed in only six (20.7%), nine (31.0%), four (3.8%), and four (13.8%) studies, respectively.

Conclusion

The overall scientific and reporting quality of radiomics studies on brain metastases published during the study period was insufficient. Radiomics studies should adhere to the RQS, TRIPOD, and IBSI guidelines to facilitate the translation of radiomics into the clinical field.

Radiomics as a New Frontier of Imaging for Cancer Prognosis: A Narrative Review

The evaluation of the efficacy of different therapies is of paramount importance for the patients and the clinicians in oncology, and it is usually possible by performing imaging investigations that are interpreted, taking in consideration different response evaluation criteria. In the last decade, texture analysis (TA) has been developed in order to help the radiologist to quantify and identify parameters related to tumor heterogeneity, which cannot be appreciated by the naked eye, that can be correlated with different endpoints, including cancer prognosis. The aim of this work is to analyze the impact of texture in the prediction of response and in prognosis stratification in oncology, taking into consideration different pathologies (lung cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, hepatic cancer, rectal cancer). Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used. This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of radiomics approaches related to cancer prognosis in different fields of diseases.

Enhancement of Radiosurgical Treatment Outcome Prediction Using MRI Radiomics in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Simple Summary

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cause of brain metastasis (BM). Approximately 50% of patients with metastatic NSCLC harbor BMs. Within the past decade, Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has become one of the first-line treatments for BMs. Ability to predict treatment response after GKRS can therefore guide treatment strategy. This study aimed to determine whether pre-radiosurgical neuroimaging radiomics can predict survival and local tumor control after GKRS. Based on the collected magnetic resonance images and clinical characteristics of the 237 NSCLC BM patients with BMs (for survival prediction) and 256 NSCLC patients with 976 BMs (for prediction of local tumor control), we concluded that the identified radiomic features could provide valuable additional information to enhance the prediction of BM responses after GKRS. The proposed approach provided physicians with an intuitive way to predict the patient outcome based on pre-radiosurgical magnetic resonance images.

Abstract

The diagnosis of brain metastasis (BM) is commonly observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with poor outcomes. Accordingly, developing an approach to early predict BM response to Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) may benefit the patient treatment and monitoring. A total of 237 NSCLC patients with BMs (for survival prediction) and 256 patients with 976 BMs (for prediction of local tumor control) treated with GKRS were retrospectively analyzed. All the survival data were recorded without censoring, and the status of local tumor control was determined by comparing the last MRI follow-up in patients’ lives with the pre-GKRS MRI. Overall 1763 radiomic features were extracted from pre-radiosurgical magnetic resonance images. Three prediction models were constructed, using (1) clinical data, (2) radiomic features, and (3) clinical and radiomic features. Support vector machines with a 30% hold-out validation approach were constructed. For treatment outcome predictions, the models derived from both the clinical and radiomics data achieved the best results. For local tumor control, the combined model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95, an accuracy of 90%, a sensitivity of 91%, and a specificity of 89%. For patient survival, the combined model achieved an AUC of 0.81, an accuracy of 77%, a sensitivity of 78%, and a specificity of 80%. The pre-radiosurgical radiomics data enhanced the performance of local tumor control and survival prediction models in NSCLC patients with BMs treated with GRKS. An outcome prediction model based on radiomics combined with clinical features may guide therapy in these patients.

Radiomics in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy: A New Approach for Tailored Treatment

Simple Summary

This review based on a literature search aims at showing the impact of Texture Analysis in the prediction of response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy. The manuscript explores radiomics approaches in different fields of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, including esophageal cancer, lung cancer, sarcoma and rectal cancer in order to shed a light in the setting of neoadjuvant radiotherapy that can be used to tailor the best subsequent therapeutical strategy.

Abstract

Introduction: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is currently used mainly in locally advanced rectal cancer and sarcoma and in a subset of non-small cell lung cancer and esophageal cancer, whereas in other diseases it is under investigation. The evaluation of the efficacy of the induction strategy is made possible by performing imaging investigations before and after the neoadjuvant therapy and is usually challenging. In the last decade, texture analysis (TA) has been developed to help the radiologist to quantify and identify the parameters related to tumor heterogeneity, which cannot be appreciated by the naked eye. The aim of this narrative is to review the impact of TA on the prediction of response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy and or chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and ClinicalTrials.gov were also used. Results: This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of radiomics approaches in different fields of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, including esophageal cancer, lung cancer, sarcoma, and rectal cancer. Conclusions: Radiomics can shed a light on the setting of neoadjuvant therapies that can be used to tailor subsequent approaches or even to avoid surgery in the future. At the same, these results need to be validated in prospective and multicenter trials.

CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas: a systematic review of reproducibility and validation strategies

Background

Feature reproducibility and model validation are two main challenges of radiomics. This study aims to systematically review radiomic feature reproducibility and predictive model validation strategies in studies dealing with CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. The ultimate goal is to promote achieving a consensus on these aspects in radiomic workflows and facilitate clinical transferability.

Results

Out of 278 identified papers, forty-nine papers published between 2008 and 2020 were included. They dealt with radiomics of bone (n = 12) or soft-tissue (n = 37) tumors. Eighteen (37%) studies included a feature reproducibility analysis. Inter-/intra-reader segmentation variability was the theme of reproducibility analysis in 16 (33%) investigations, outnumbering the analyses focused on image acquisition or post-processing (n = 2, 4%). The intraclass correlation coefficient was the most commonly used statistical method to assess reproducibility, which ranged from 0.6 and 0.9. At least one machine learning validation technique was used for model development in 25 (51%) papers, and K-fold cross-validation was the most commonly employed. A clinical validation of the model was reported in 19 (39%) papers. It was performed using a separate dataset from the primary institution (i.e., internal validation) in 14 (29%) studies and an independent dataset related to different scanners or from another institution (i.e., independent validation) in 5 (10%) studies.

Conclusions

The issues of radiomic feature reproducibility and model validation varied largely among the studies dealing with musculoskeletal sarcomas and should be addressed in future investigations to bring the field of radiomics from a preclinical research area to the clinical stage.

Current progress and quality of radiomic studies for predicting EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using PET/CT images: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the methodological quality of radiomic studies based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images predicting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We systematically searched for eligible studies in the PubMed and Web of Science datasets using the terms "radiomics", "PET/CT", "NSCLC", and "EGFR". The included studies were screened by two reviewers independently. The quality of the radiomic workflow of studies was assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine inter rater agreement for the RQS. An overview of the methodologies used in steps of the radiomics workflow and current results are presented.

RESULTS

Six studies were included with sample sizes of 973 ranging from 115 to 248 patients. Methodologies in the radiomic workflow varied greatly. The first-order statistics were the most reproducible features. The RQS scores varied from 13.9 to 47.2%. All studies were scored below 50% due to defects on multiple segmentations, phantom study on all scanners, imaging at multiple time points, cut-off analyses, calibration statistics, prospective study, potential clinical utility, and cost-effectiveness analysis. The ICC results for majority of RQS items were excellent. The ICC for summed RQS was 0.986 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.898-0.998].

CONCLUSIONS

The PET/CT-based radiomics signature could serve as a diagnostic indicator of EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients. However, the current conclusions should be interpreted with care due to the suboptimal quality of the studies. Consensus for standardization of PET/CT-based radiomic workflow for EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients is warranted to further improve research.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Radiomics can offer clinicians better insight into the prediction of EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients, whereas the quality of relative studies should be improved before application to the clinical setting.

Margin Assessment in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

Many classifications to assess margins status for soft tissue sarcomas are reported in the literature. Most of the series are heterogeneous and variable in size, making it difficult to compare results from study to study. Thus, which is the best way to assess margins in order to predict the risk of local recurrence is still debated. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS).

Abstract

Adequacy of margins must take into consideration both the resection margin width (quantity) and anatomic barrier (quality). There are several classification schemes for reporting surgical resection margin status for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Most of the studies regarding treatment outcomes in STS included all histologic grades and histological subtypes, which include infiltrative and non-infiltrative subtypes and are very heterogeneous in terms of both histologic characteristics and treatment modalities (adjuvant treatments or not). This lack of consistency makes it difficult to compare results from study to study. Therefore, there is a great need for evidence-based standardization concerning the width of resection margins. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with STS. Patient cases should be discussed at multidisciplinary tumor boards and treatments should be individualized to clinical and demographic characteristics, which must include also a deep knowledge of specific histotypes behaviors, particularly infiltrative ones.

Imaging response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment in soft tissue sarcomas: Where do we stand?

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a broad family of rare tumours for which surgery with radiotherapy represents first-line treatment. Recently, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy has been increasingly used in high-risk patients in an effort to reduce surgical morbidity and improve clinical outcomes. An adequate understanding of the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapies would optimise patient care, allowing a tailored approach. Although response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) is the most common imaging method to assess tumour response, Choi criteria and functional and molecular imaging (DWI, DCE-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG-PET) seem to outperform it in the discrimination between responders and non-responders. Moreover, the radiologic-pathology correlation of treatment-related changes remains poorly understood. In this review, we provide an overview of the imaging assessment of tumour response in STS undergoing neoadjuvant treatment, including conventional imaging (CT, MRI, PET) and advanced imaging analysis. Future directions will be presented to shed light on potential advances in pre-surgical imaging assessments that have clinical implications for sarcoma patients.