Diagnostic accuracy of axillary staging by ultrasound in early breast cancer patients

Evaluation of Ex Vivo Shear Wave Elastography of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Patients with Early Breast Cancer

Background: The pretherapeutic assessment of axillary lymph node status is crucial in staging early breast cancer patients, significantly influencing their further treatment and prognosis. According to current guidelines, patients with clinically unsuspicious axillary status regularly undergo a biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), whereby metastasis is detected in up to 20% of cases. In recent years, the use of shear wave elastography (SWE) has been studied as an additional ultrasound tool for the non-invasive assessment of tumors in the breast parenchyma and axillary lymph nodes. Previous studies (examining the axilla in patients) have shown that metastases have significantly higher SWE values than benign nodes. Methods: This study aims to evaluate whether SWE can differentiate between tumor-free and metastatic-affected SLN ex vivo, i.e., by examining the pathological specimen. SWE was performed ex vivo on SLN specimens and compared with final histopathological results. Results: A total of 168 SLNs from 105 patients were measured using ex vivo SWE and subjected to standard histopathological processing. In this group, 17 metastases in 17 patients (16.19%) were detected. Tumor-free SLNs had a mean velocity of 1.33 ± 0.23 m/s, while metastatic nodes showed a mean velocity of 1.35 ± 0.29 m/s (p = 0.724). There was no significant difference in ex vivo SWE between benign and malignant SLNs in this population. Conclusions: Contrary to previous studies, this study did not find SWE effective in differentiating lymph node metastases. Further research is needed to clarify SWE's potential role in axillary staging.

Multiparametric ultrasound assessment of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer

The presence and extent of metastatic disease in axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) in the setting of breast cancer (BC) are important factors for staging and therapy planning. The purpose of this study was to perform a multiparametric sonographic evaluation of ALNs to better differentiate between benign and metastatic nodes. Ninety-nine patients (mean age 54.1 y) with 103 BCs were included in this study, and 103 ALNs were examined sonographically. B-mode parameters, such as size in two dimensions, shape, cortical thickness and capsule outline, were obtained, followed by vascularity assessment via colour Doppler and microflow imaging and stiffness evaluation via shear wave elastography. Postoperative histopathological evaluation was the reference standard. In the statistical analysis, logistic regression and ROC analyses were conducted to search for feature patterns of both types of ALNs to evaluate the prediction qualities of the analysed variables and their combinations. For a cortex larger than 3 mm, without a circumscribed margin of the LN capsule and SWE (E max > 26 kPa), the AUC was 0.823. Multiparametric assessment, which combined conventional US, quantitative SWE and vascularity analysis, was superior to the single-parameter approach in the evaluation of ALNs.

Peritumoral edema enhances MRI-based deep learning radiomic model for axillary lymph node metastasis burden prediction in breast cancer

To investigate whether peritumoral edema (PE) could enhance deep learning radiomic (DLR) model in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) burden in breast cancer. Invasive breast cancer patients with preoperative MRI were retrospectively enrolled and categorized into low (< 2 lymph nodes involved (LNs+)) and high (≥ 2 LNs+) burden groups based on surgical pathology. PE was evaluated on T2WI, and intra- and peri-tumoral radiomic features were extracted from MRI-visible tumors in DCE-MRI. Deep learning models were developed for LN burden prediction in the training cohort and validated in an independent cohort. The incremental value of PE was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, confirming the improvement in the area under the curve (AUC) using the Delong test. This was complemented by net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) metrics. The deep learning combined model, incorporating PE with selected radiomic features, demonstrated significantly higher AUC values compared to the MRI model and the DLR model in the training cohort (n = 177) (AUC: 0.953 vs. 0.849 and 0.867, p < 0.05) and the validation cohort (n = 111) (AUC: 0.963 vs. 0.883 and 0.882, p < 0.05). The complementary analysis demonstrated that PE significantly enhances the prediction performance of the DLR model (Categorical NRI: 0.551, p < 0.001; IDI = 0.343, p < 0.001). These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort (Categorical NRI: 0.539, p < 0.001; IDI = 0.387, p < 0.001). PE improved preoperative ALNM burden prediction of DLR model, facilitating personalized axillary management in breast cancer patients.

Shear-wave elastography as a supplementary tool for axillary staging in patients undergoing breast cancer diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative evaluation of axillary lymph node status is crucial for the selection of both systemic and surgical treatment in early breast cancer. This study assessed the particular role of additional shear wave elastography (SWE) in axillary staging in patients undergoing initial breast cancer diagnostics.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing axillary lymph node biopsy due to a sonographically suspicious axillary lymph node were prospectively evaluated with SWE using virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ). Mean values of tissue stiffness for axillary tissue and lymph node tissue were measured prior to core-cut biopsy of the lymph node. All lymph nodes were clip-marked during the biopsy. Cut-off values to differentiate between malignant and benign lymph nodes were defined using Youden's index.

RESULTS

Lymph nodes with evidence of malignant tumor cells in the final pathological examination showed a significantly higher velocity as measured by SWE, with a mean velocity of 3.48 ± 1.58 m/s compared to 2.33 ± 0.62 m/s of benign lymph nodes (p < 0.0001). The statistically optimal cutoff to differentiate between malignant and benign lymph nodes was 2.66 m/s with a sensitivity of 69.8% and a specificity of 87.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastases assessed with SWE showed significantly higher elasticity values compared to benign lymph nodes. Thus, SWE provides an additional useful and quantifiable parameter for the sonographic assessment of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the context of pre-therapeutic axillary staging in order to differentiate between benign and metastatic processes and support the guidance of definitive biopsy work-up.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Shear-wave elastography provides an additional useful and quantifiable parameter for the assessment of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the context of pre-therapeutic axillary staging in order to differentiate between benign and metastatic processes and support guiding the definitive biopsy work-up.

KEY POINTS

SWE is a quantifiable ultrasound parameter in breast cancer diagnosis. SWE shows a significantly higher velocity in malignant lymph nodes. SWE is useful in improving the sensitivity and specificity of axillary staging.

Preoperative Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging and Shear-Wave Elastography for Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Breast Cancer

ABSTRACT

This study aims to evaluate the role of shearwave elastography (SWE) and superb microvascular imaging (SMI) for preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in patients with breast cancer. In a cohort of 214 women with breast cancer, B-Mode ultrasonography (US), SMIvascular-index (SMIvi), and SWE (E-mean, E-ratio) values were recorded before tru-cut biopsy. Axillary fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and sentinel lymph node sampling results were collected. Imaging findings and histopathological data were statistically compared. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic performance. Reverse stepwise logistical regression analysis was conducted. Although ALNM was negative in 111 cases, it was positive in 103 patients. Axillary lymph node metastasis (+) group had larger size ( P < 0.001), higher vascularization (SMIvi: 8.0 ± 6.0 versus 5.0 ± 4.3, P < 0.001), and higher elasticity value (E-mean: 129 ± 31 kPa versus 117.3 ± 40 kPa, P = 0.014). Axillary lymph node metastasis was observed statistically more frequently in Her-2 positive cases ( P = 0.005). There was no significant difference between other B-mode US findings ( P > 0.05), SMI Adler ( P = 0.878), and E-ratio ( P = 0.212). The most appropriate cutoff value for the prediction of ALNM was 23.5 mm for size, 3.8 for SMIvi, and 138.5 kPa for E-mean. The most sensitive (77%) method was the SMIvi measurement, while the most specific (86%) finding was Her-2 positivity. The combined model (being Her-2 positive, >23.5 cm, and >3.8 SMIvi) increased the specificity (78%), PPV (71%), and accuracy (68%). Although the increased size is a previously studied parameter in predicting the risk of ALNM, Her-2 and data obtained by SWE, and SMI can be used to assist conventional US.

Clinical Axillary Staging in Breast Cancer Patients Using Ultrasound Imaging

Introduction

The presence of axillary lymph node involvement is an important prognostic factor and has a major impact on treatment decisions in early breast cancer patients. This study aimed to determine the role of cortical thickness in axillary ultrasound (AUS) as an indicator of lymph node metastasis.

Methods

766 patients with primary breast cancer who received AUS during clinical work-up were selected for this retrospective study. Lymph nodes were defined as suspicious if they showed a cortical thickness of >3.0 mm at 11-15 MHz harmonic imaging ultrasound. Lymph node involvement was assessed by core needle biopsy (n = 150), sentinel node dissection or axillary dissection. Extensive axillary spread (EAS) was diagnosed if more than two lymph nodes showed metastatic disease in histology.

Results

AUS for detecting all lymph node metastases had a sensitivity of 62.27%, a specificity of 93.15% and a negative predictive value of 81.74%. However, the resulting negative predictive value for transcapsular growth was 93.97%, and for EAS 97.52%.

Conclusion

EAS - in contrast to non-palpable involvement of 1 or 2 lymph nodes - contributes relevantly to the individualization of breast cancer treatment. In combination with SNB, AUS using cortical thickness as the main distinctive parameter seems to be an easily available, robust tool of diagnosing extensive axillary metastases. If AUS proves negative, it helps to reduce the number of classic axillary dissections.

Axillary ultrasonography for early-stage invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Among women with early invasive breast cancer and 1-2 positive sentinel nodes, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is non-inferior to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).1-3 However, preoperative axillary ultrasonography (AxUS) may not be sensitive enough to discriminate burden of nodal metastasis in these patients, potentially leading to overtreatment.4-6 This study compares axillary operation rates in patients who did and did not receive preoperative AxUS, assessing its utility and risks for overtreatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with clinical T1/T2 breast tumors who were clinically node negative and underwent an axillary operation.

RESULTS

Patients who had preoperative AxUS received more ALND compared to patients who did not (5.6% vs. 1.4%, p ​< ​0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of additional axillary operations following SLNB (2.1% vs. 2.3%, p ​= ​0.77).

CONCLUSION

Eliminating preoperative AxUS is associated with fewer invasive ALND procedures, without increased rate of axillary reoperations.

Axillary Surgery for Breast Cancer in 2024

Axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer (BC) in 2024 is becoming increasingly specific, moving away from the previous 'one size fits all' radical approach. The goal is to spare morbidity whilst maintaining oncologic safety. In the upfront surgery setting, a first landmark randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the omission of any surgical axillary staging in patients with unremarkable clinical examination and axillary ultrasound showed non-inferiority to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB). The study population consisted of 87.8% postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC. Patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer and up to two positive SLNs can safely be spared axillary dissection (ALND) even in the context of mastectomy or extranodal extension. In patients enrolled in the TAXIS trial, adjuvant systemic treatment was shown to be similar with or without ALND despite the loss of staging information. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), targeted lymph node removal with or without SLNB showed a lower false-negative rate to determine nodal pathological complete response (pCR) compared to SLNB alone. However, oncologic outcomes do not appear to differ in patients with nodal pCR determined by either one of the two concepts, according to a recently published global, retrospective, real-world study. Real-world studies generally have a lower level of evidence than RCTs, but they are feasible quickly and with a large sample size. Another global real-world study provides evidence that even patients with residual isolated tumor cells can be safely spared from ALND. In general, few indications for ALND remain. Three randomized controlled trials are ongoing for patients with clinically node-positive BC in the upfront surgery setting and residual disease after NACT. Pending the results of these trials, ALND remains indicated in these patients.

Automated Versus Handheld Breast Ultrasound for Evaluating Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is a relevant imaging technique for early breast cancer diagnosis and is increasingly being used as a supplementary tool for mammography. This study compared the performance of ABUS and handheld ultrasound (HHUS) in detecting and characterizing the axillary lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women with recently diagnosed early breast cancer (≤ T2) who underwent both ABUS and HHUS examinations for axilla (September 2017-May 2018). ABUS and HHUS findings were compared using pathological outcomes as reference standards. Diagnostic performance in predicting any axillary LN metastasis and heavy nodal-burden metastases (i.e., ≥ 3 LNs) was evaluated. The ABUS-HHUS agreement for visibility and US findings was calculated.

RESULTS

The study included 377 women (53.1 ± 11.1 years). Among 385 breast cancers in 377 patients, 101 had axillary LN metastases and 30 had heavy nodal burden metastases. ABUS identified benign-looking or suspicious axillary LNs (average, 1.4 ± 0.8) in 246 axillae (63.9%, 246/385). According to the per-breast analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of ABUS in predicting axillary LN metastases were 43.6% (44/101), 95.1% (270/284), 75.9% (44/58), 82.6% (270/327), and 81.6% (314/385), respectively. The corresponding results for HHUS were 41.6% (42/101), 95.1% (270/284), 75.0% (42/56), 82.1% (270/329), and 81.0% (312/385), respectively, which were not significantly different from those of ABUS (P ≥ 0.53). The performance results for heavy nodal-burden metastases were 70.0% (21/30), 89.6% (318/355), 36.2% (21/58), 97.3% (318/327), and 88.1% (339/385), respectively, for ABUS and 66.7% (20/30), 89.9% (319/355), 35.7% (20/56), 97.0% (319/329), and 88.1% (339/385), respectively, for HHUS, also not showing significant difference (P ≥ 0.57). The ABUS-HHUS agreement was 95.9% (236/246; Cohen's kappa = 0.883).

CONCLUSION

Although ABUS showed limited sensitivity in diagnosing axillary LN metastasis in early breast cancer, it was still useful as the performance was comparable to that of HHUS.

The Ongoing Necessity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for cT1-2N0 Breast Cancer Patients

Background

Recent clinical trials attempt to determine whether it is appropriate to omit axillary lymph node surgery in patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer. The study aimed to investigate the true extent of axillary node disease in patients with clinically negative nodes and explore the differences between negative axillary ultrasound (AUS-cN0) and suspicious axillary ultrasound with negative fine-needle aspiration (FNA-cN0).

Methods

Pathologically identified T1-2 invasive breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes were retrospectively analyzed at our center between January 2019 and December 2022. Patients who received any systematic treatment before surgery were excluded from this study.

Results

A total of 538 patients were enrolled in this study. 134 (24.9%) patients had pathologically positive nodes, and 404 (75.1%) patients had negative nodes. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size, T stage, Ki67 level, and vascular invasion (VI) were strongly associated with pathological axillary lymph node positivity. In multivariate analysis, VI was the only independent risk factor for node positivity in patients with cT1-2N0 disease (OR: 3.723, confidence interval [CI]: 2.380-5.824, p < 0.001). Otherwise, pathological node positivity was not significantly different between AUS-cN0 and FNA-cN0 groups (23.4% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.193). However, the rate of high nodal burden (≥3 positive nodes) was significantly higher in FNA-cN0 group. Further investigation revealed that FNA-cN0 and VI were independently associated with a high nodal burden (OR: 2.650, CI: 1.081-6.496, p = 0.033; OR: 3.521, CI: 1.249-9.931, p = 0.017, respectively).

Conclusions

cT1-2 breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes may have pathologically positive lymph nodes and even a high nodal burden. False negatives in AUS and AUS-guided FNA should not be ignored, and sentinel lymph node biopsy remains an ongoing necessity for cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients.

Nomogram based on multiparametric analysis of early-stage breast cancer: Prediction of high burden metastatic axillary lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

The Z0011 and AMAROS trials found that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was no longer mandatory for early-stage breast cancer patients who had one or two metastatic axillary lymph nodes (mALNs). The aim of our study was to establish a nomogram which could be used to quantitatively predict the individual likelihood of high burden mALN (≥3 mALN).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 564 women with early breast cancer who had all undergone both ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to examine axillary lymph nodes before radical surgery. All the patients were divided into training (n = 452) and validation (n = 112) cohorts by computer-generated random numbers. Their clinicopathological features and preoperative imaging associated with high burden mALNs were evaluated by logistic regression analysis to develop a nomogram for predicting the probability of high burden mALNs.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that high burden mALNs were significantly associated with replaced hilum and the shortest diameter >10 mm on MRI, with cortex thickness >3 mm on US (p < 0.05 each). These imaging criteria plus higher grade (grades II and III) and quadrant of breast tumor were used to develop a nomogram calculating the probability of high burden mALNs. The AUC of the nomogram was 0.853 (95% CI: 0.790-0.908) for the training set and 0.783 (95% CI: 0.638-0.929) for the validation set. Both internal and external validation evaluated the accuracy of nomogram to be good.

CONCLUSION

A well-discriminated nomogram was developed to predict the high burden mALN in early-stage breast patients, which may assist the breast surgeon in choosing the appropriate surgical approach.

Use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in elderly patients with breast cancer - 10-year experience from a Swiss university hospital

BACKGROUND

The Choosing Wisely initiative recommended the omission of routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients ≥ 70 years of age, with clinically node-negative, early stage, hormone receptor (HR) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) negative breast cancer in August 2016. Here, we assess the adherence to this recommendation in a Swiss university hospital.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single center cohort study from a prospectively maintained database. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with node-negative breast cancer were treated between 05/2011 and 03/2022. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in the Choosing Wisely target group who underwent SLNB before and after the initiative went live. Statistical significance was tested using chi-squared test for categorical and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables.

RESULTS

In total, 586 patients met the inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 2.7 years. Of these, 163 were ≥ 70 years of age and 79 were eligible for treatment according to the Choosing Wisely recommendations. There was a trend toward a higher rate of SLNB (92.7% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.07) after the Choosing Wisely recommendations were published. In patients ≥ 70 years with invasive disease, fewer received adjuvant radiotherapy after omission of SLNB (6.2% vs. 64.0%, p < 0.001), without differences concerning adjuvant systemic therapy. Both short-term and long-term complication rates after SLNB were low, without differences between elderly patients and those < 70 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Choosing Wisely recommendations did not result in a decreased use of SLNB in the elderly at a Swiss university hospital.

Uncertainties and controversies in axillary management of patients with breast cancer

The aims of this Oncoplastic Breast Consortium and European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists initiative were to identify uncertainties and controversies in axillary management of early breast cancer and to recommend appropriate strategies to address them. By use of Delphi methods, 15 questions were prioritized by more than 250 breast surgeons, patient advocates and radiation oncologists from 60 countries. Subsequently, a global virtual consensus panel considered available data, ongoing studies and resource utilization. It agreed that research should no longer be prioritized for standardization of axillary imaging, de-escalation of axillary surgery in node-positive cancer and risk evaluation of modern surgery and radiotherapy. Instead, expert consensus recommendations for clinical practice should be based on current evidence and updated once results from ongoing studies become available. Research on de-escalation of radiotherapy and identification of the most relevant endpoints in axillary management should encompass a meta-analysis to identify knowledge gaps, followed by a Delphi process to prioritize and a consensus conference to refine recommendations for specific trial designs. Finally, treatment of residual nodal disease after surgery was recommended to be assessed in a prospective register.

Safety and Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone in Clinically Node-Positive Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Landmark trials (Z0011 and AMAROS) have demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be safely omitted in patients with breast cancer and 1-2 positive sentinel nodes. Extrapolating from these and other cardinal studies such as NSABP B-04, guidelines state that patients with 1-2 needle biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes undergoing upfront surgery can have sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature to identify studies examining the direct application of SLNB in such patients. EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE were searched from inception to 3 May 2022. Studies including patients with nodal involvement confirmed on pre-operative biopsy and undergoing SLNB were identified. Studies with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Search resulted in 2518 records, of which 68 full-text studies were reviewed, ultimately yielding only 2 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Both studies used targeted axillary surgery (TAS) with pre-operative localization of the biopsy-proven positive node in addition to standard SLNB techniques. In a non-randomized single-center prospective study, Lee et al. report no regional recurrences in patients undergoing TAS or ALND, and no difference in distant recurrence or mortality at 5 years. In the prospective multicenter TAXIS trial by Webber et al., the median number of positive nodes retrieved with TAS in patients undergoing upfront surgery was 2 (1, 4 IQR). Within the subset of patients who underwent subsequent ALND, 61 (70.9%) had additional positive nodes, with 26 (30.2%) patients having ≥4 additional positive nodes. Our review demonstrates that there is limited direct evidence for SLNB alone in clinically node-positive patients undergoing upfront surgery. Available data suggest a high proportion of patients with residual disease in this setting. While the totality of the data, mostly indirect evidence, suggests SLNB alone may be safe, we call on clinicians and researchers to prospectively collect data on this patient population to better inform decision-making.

Predicting axillary nodal metastasis based on the side of asymmetrical cortical thickening in breast cancer: Evaluation with grayscale and microvascular imaging findings

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between sonographic findings and the axillary status, especially the side of thickening in the presence of cortical asymmetry.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis were included in this study. The lymph nodes were divided into three groups depending on the type of cortical thickening as diffuse, closer (eccentric cortical thickening on the side near the tumor and/or breast) and distant (thickening on the further side) asymmetry. Longitudinal to transverse axis (L/T) ratio, the largest cortical thickness, cortex to hilum ratio (C/H), hilar status (normal/displaced/absent), orientation (parallel/vertical), capsular integrity (sharp/indistinct), vascularisation pattern (hilar/peripheral/penetrant/anarchic/avascular) on superb microvascular imaging (SMI) and presence of conglomeration were recorded for each lymph node. Axillary nodal status on ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT/MRI scans was recorded, if available. Features of the breast lesions like size, laterality, nuclear grade, hormone receptor status and the level of Ki-67 expression have been added.

RESULTS

A total of 219 metastatic ALNs [diffuse (n = 122), closer asymmetry (n = 71), distant asymmetry (n = 26)] were evaluated. By the univariate analysis, ALN metastasis was significantly associated with the presence of closer asymmetrical cortical thickening (p < 0,0001), C/H ratio (p = 0.001), cortical thickness (p = 0.001), hilar status (p < 0.005) and vascular pattern (p < 0.005). L/T ratio was only a statistically significant parameter for lymph nodes with diffuse cortical enlargement in predicting metastasis, and conglomeration was also observed only in this group (p < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, nodal metastasis was significantly associated with asymmetrical cortical thickening (p = 0.001), C/H ratio (p = 0.005) and vascular pattern (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Asymmetrical cortical enlargement on the side closer to the breast, C/H ratio and abnormal microvascular pattern are the independent predictors of axillary nodal involvement. Closer asymmetry is an eligible, easy-to-detect grayscale US finding to decide sampling that highly predicts ALN metastasis.

Can computed tomography predict nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients?

Background

Axillary lymph node metastasis is considered one of the main prognostic factors clinically used for the evaluation of breast cancer patient. Also, an accurate diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis has a significant effect on the tumor staging and treatment planning. Ultrasonography is a noninvasive, available imaging modality that is capable of giving a real-time evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer cases. On the other hand, multi-detector-row computed tomography is increasingly preferred by clinicians to preoperatively evaluate regional lymph node status in many cancers. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of computed tomography against ultrasound in detecting axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients.

Results

One hundred and fifty breast cancer patients were included in this prospective study. According to the final pathological results, 79/150 (52.7%) lymph nodes were metastatic, while 71/150 (47.3%) lymph nodes were benign with no evidence of metastases. Ultrasound examination has achieved a sensitivity of 76.4% and a specificity of 60.8% with overall diagnostic accuracy of 68.7%. Computed tomography (CT) examination has achieved a much higher sensitivity of 98.6%, a much lower specificity of 35.4%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 65.3%. In our study, CT examination was superior on ultrasound in the determination of the level of lymph node affection, and this may be attributed to the dependency of ultrasound examination on the operator’s experience.

Conclusions

CT is not routinely used in the assessment of nodal stage. However, if used in proper clinical setting, it may increase our confidence in excluding nodal metastasis owing to its high sensitivity. Despite its low specificity, it may act as road map for the surgeon, providing the ability to assess all groups of lymph nodes as well as the number of the suspicious lymph nodes.

Ultrasonography and clinicopathological features of breast cancer in predicting axillary lymph node metastases

Background

Early identification of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer (BC) is still a clinical difficulty. There is still no good method to replace sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The purpose of our study was to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of ALNM preoperatively based on ultrasonography (US) and clinicopathological features of primary tumors.

Methods

From September 2019 to April 2022, the preoperative US) and clinicopathological data of 1076 T1-T2 BC patients underwent surgical treatment were collected. Patients were divided into a training set (875 patients from September 2019 to October 2021) and a validation set (201 patients from November 2021 to April 2022). Patients were divided into positive and negative axillary lymph node (ALN) group according pathology of axillary surgery. Compared the US and clinicopathological features between the two groups. The risk factors for ALNM were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram was constructed. AUC and calibration were used to assess its performance.

Results

By univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (p = 0.009), histologic grades (p = 0.000), molecular subtypes (p = 0.000), tumor location (p = 0.000), maximum diameter (p = 0.000), spiculated margin (p = 0.000) and distance from the skin (p = 0.000) were independent risk factors of ALNM. Then a nomogram was developed. The model was good discriminating with an AUC of 0.705 and 0.745 for the training and validation set, respectively. And the calibration curves demonstrated high agreement. However, in further predicting a heavy nodal disease burden (> 2 nodes), none of the variables were significant.

Conclusion

This nomogram based on the US and clinicopathological data can predict the presence of ALNM good in T1-T2 BC patients. But it cannot effectively predict a heavy nodal disease burden (> 2 nodes).

Shear wave elastography as a supplemental tool in the assessment of unsuspicious axillary lymph nodes in patients undergoing breast ultrasound examination

Objectives:

To define reference values for shear wave elastography (SWE) in unsuspicious axillary lymph nodes in patients undergoing breast ultrasound examination.

Methods:

In total, 177 clinically and sonographically unsuspicious axillary lymph nodes were prospectively evaluated with SWE using Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification (VTIQ) in 175 women. Mean values of tissue stiffness for axillary fatty tissue, lymph node cortex, and lymph node hilus were measured. Additionally, test-retest reliability of SWE in the assessment of axillary lymph node stiffness was evaluated by repeating each measurement three times.

Results:

In 177 axillary lymph nodes, the mean stiffness of lymph node cortex, hilus, and surrounding fatty tissue as quantified by SWE was 1.90 m/s (SD: 0.34 m/s), 2.02 m/s (SD: 0.37 m/s), and 1.75 m/s (SD: 0.38 m/s), respectively. The mean stiffness of cortex and hilus was significantly higher compared to fatty tissue (p < 0.0001). SWE demonstrated good test–retest reliability in the assessment of stiffness of the lymph node hilus, cortex, and the surrounding fatty tissue with an intraclass correlation of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75; 0.83), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70; 0.79), and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74; 0.82), respectively, (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

Reference values for SWE in unsuspicious axillary lymph nodes are determined. These results may help to better identify axillary lymph node metastasis for breast cancer patients when combined with other lymph node features. SWE is a reliable method for the objective quantification of tissue stiffness of axillary lymph nodes.

Advances in knowledge:

This study presents physiological reference values for tissue stiffness by examining the axillary lymph nodes with SWE in 175 women with sonomorphologically unsuspicious lymph nodes.

Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm

PURPOSE

The reliable detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer [BC] patients plays a decisive role in further therapy. We aimed to find out whether cross-sectional imaging techniques could improve sensitivity for pretherapeutic axillary staging in nodal-positive BC patients compared to conventional imaging such as mammography and sonography.

METHODS

Data for breast cancer patients with tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes having received surgery between 2014 and 2020 were included in this study. All examinations (sonography, mammography, computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were interpreted by board-certified specialists in radiology. The sensitivity of different imaging modalities was calculated, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to detect variables influencing the detection of positive lymph nodes.

RESULTS

All included 382 breast cancer patients had received conventional imaging, while 52.61% of the patients had received cross-sectional imaging. The sensitivity of the combination of all imaging modalities was 68.89%. The combination of MRI and CT showed 63.83% and the combination of sonography and mammography showed 36.11% sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

We could demonstrate that cross-sectional imaging can improve the sensitivity of the detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Only the safe detection of these lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis enables the evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant therapy, thereby allowing access to prognosis and improving new post-neoadjuvant therapies.

Neoadjuvant approach in patients with early breast cancer: patient assessment, staging, and planning

Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has become an option in early stage (stage I-II) breast cancer (EBC). New advances in systemic and targeted therapies have increased rates of pathologic complete response increasing the number of patients undergoing NAT. Clear benefits of NAT are downstaging the tumor and the axillary nodes to de-escalate surgery and to evaluate response to treatment. Selection of patients for NAT in EBC rely in several factors that are related to patient characteristics (i.e, age and comorbidities), to tumor histology, to stage at diagnosis and to the potential changes in surgical or adjuvant treatments when NAT is administered.

Imaging and histologic confirmation is performed to assess extent of disease y to confirm diagnosis. Besides mammogram and ultrasound, functional breast imaging MRI has been incorporated to better predict treatment response and residual disease. Contrast enhanced mammogram (CEM), shear wave elastography (SWE), or Dynamic Optical Breast Imaging (DOBI) are emerging techniques under investigation for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy as well as for predicting response. Surgical plan should be delineated after NAT taking into account baseline characteristics, tumor response and patient desire.

In the COVID era, we have witnessed also the increasing use of NAT in patients who may be directed to surgery, unable to have it performed as surgery has been reserved for emergency cases only.

The NILS Study Protocol: A Retrospective Validation Study of an Artificial Neural Network Based Preoperative Decision-Making Tool for Noninvasive Lymph Node Staging in Women with Primary Breast Cancer (ISRCTN14341750)

Newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) patients with clinical T1–T2 N0 disease undergo sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) biopsy, although most of them have a benign SLN. The pilot noninvasive lymph node staging (NILS) artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict nodal status was published in 2019, showing the potential to identify patients with a low risk of SLN metastasis. The aim of this study is to assess the performance measures of the model after a web-based implementation for the prediction of a healthy SLN in clinically N0 BC patients. This retrospective study was designed to validate the NILS prediction model for SLN status using preoperatively available clinicopathological and radiological data. The model results in an estimated probability of a healthy SLN for each study participant. Our primary endpoint is to report on the performance of the NILS prediction model to distinguish between healthy and metastatic SLNs (N0 vs. N+) and compare the observed and predicted event rates of benign SLNs. After validation, the prediction model may assist medical professionals and BC patients in shared decision making on omitting SLN biopsies in patients predicted to be node-negative by the NILS model. This study was prospectively registered in the ISRCTN registry (identification number: 14341750).

The Role of US in Depicting Axillary Metastasis in High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of US in depicting axillary nodal disease in high-risk patients with and without pathogenic mutations. Methods: The retrospective study included consecutive high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients who underwent a multigene testing panel for hereditary cancers, pre-operative axillary US and breast/axillary surgery. The group was divided into patients with pathogenic mutations (PM group) and patients without PM. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism by applying Chi-square and Fisher exact tests, with a reference p-value < 0.05 and a CI of 95%. Results: Out of 190 patients with BC, 96 (51%) were negative and 94 (49%) were positive for PM as follows: 28 (25.5%) BRCA1, 16 (17%) BRCA2, 15 (16%) CHECK2, 14 (14%) RAD Group, 7 (7%) PALB, 6 (6%) NBN, 3 (3%) TP53 and ATM and 2 (2%) BARD1. US was positive in 88 of the patients, 36 with PM and 52 without PM. US and surgery (≥N1 stage) were both positive in 31 (62%) of PM patients and 44 (88%) of patients without genetic changes. There were 19 (61%) false negative US examinations in the PM group and 6 (13%) in the group without genetic changes, respectively. If the US is positive, there is a 2.6 times greater risk of positive nodes in PM patients (p-value < 0.000, 95% CI = 4.2–37.9), and a 6.2 times greater risk of positive nodes in patients without genetic changes (p-value < 0.000, 95%CI = 8.4–37.4). In the PM group, US compared to surgery reached a sensitivity = 62, with PPV = 86 and NPV = 67. In the BRCA1/2 subgroup, there is 2.5 greater times risk of nodal disease if the US is positive (p-value = 0.001, 95%CI = 2.6–76). In patients without PM, US compared to surgery reached a sensitivity = 88, PPV = 84 and NPV = 86. Conclusion: US is more sensitive in depicting axillary nodal disease in high-risk patients without PM compared to PM patients. Furthermore, there are more false negative US examinations in PM patients, compared to surgery patients.

Axillary lymph node status in BIRADS 4-5 female patients: can shear wave and strain ultrasound elastography help?

Background

The status of axillary nodes is a determining factor of management and prognosis for patients having a recent diagnosis of breast cancer. Axillary nodes are usually evaluated by ultrasonography (US) and biopsy, if indicated. Ultrasound-guided sampling and intraoperative or sentinel nodal sampling are available options, however, are invasive and hold risks of potential complications, calling for reliable, non-invasive axillary imaging. In the current prospective study, we assessed the performance of shear wave (SWE) and strain (SE) ultrasound elastography regarding preoperative axillary assessment. Sixty axillary nodes from 60 patients (age 28–65 years, mean 49.88 ± 7.61 SD) were included, all scoring BIRADS 4–5 on sonomammography.

Results

For US, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 100%, 66.67%, 84.78%, 100%, and 88.33%, respectively. Cortical thickness and vascularity were the most sensitive. For qualitative SWE, indices were 76.92%, 80.95%, 88.24%, 65.38% and 78.33%, respectively. Calculated cut-off for Emax was 59.3 and for Eratio was 4.56, giving statistical indices of 76.9%, 90.5%, 93.75%, 67.86%, and 81.67% for Emax and 76.9%, 100%, 100%, 70% and 85% respectively for Eratio. Both Emax and Eratio were greater for malignant (Emax 81.77 ± 1.904, Eratio 8.95 ± 5.69) than for benign nodes (Emax 37.59 ± 33.37, Eratio 2.5 ± 1.37) (P values < 0.001). For qualitative SE, sensitivity and specificity were 92.31% and 57.14%, while PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 80% each (P values < 0.001). The calculated cut-off value for SR was 3.85, giving indices of 87.2%, 76.2%, 76.19%, 87.18% and 83.33% respectively.

Conclusion

Adding elastography evaluation to conventional US positively impacts the specificity and accuracy of the preoperative axillary nodal status assessment in patients having newly diagnosed breast cancer.