COVID-19 pneumonia and its lookalikes: How radiologists perform in differentiating atypical pneumonias

Pharmacology of Hydrogen Sulfide and Its Donors in Cardiometabolic Diseases

Cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs) are major contributors to global mortality, emphasizing the critical need for novel therapeutic interventions. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) has garnered enormous attention as a significant gasotransmitter with various physiological, pathophysiological, and pharmacological impacts within mammalian cardiometabolic systems. In addition to its roles in attenuating oxidative stress and inflammatory response, burgeoning research emphasizes the significance of H2S in regulating proteins via persulfidation, a well known modification intricately associated with the pathogenesis of CMDs. This review seeks to investigate recent updates on the physiological actions of endogenous H2S and the pharmacological roles of various H2S donors in addressing diverse aspects of CMDs across cellular, animal, and clinical studies. Of note, advanced methodologies, including multiomics, intestinal microflora analysis, organoid, and single-cell sequencing techniques, are gaining traction due to their ability to offer comprehensive insights into biomedical research. These emerging approaches hold promise in characterizing the pharmacological roles of H2S in health and diseases. We will critically assess the current literature to clarify the roles of H2S in diseases while also delineating the opportunities and challenges they present in H2S-based pharmacotherapy for CMDs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This comprehensive review covers recent developments in H2S biology and pharmacology in cardiometabolic diseases CMDs. Endogenous H2S and its donors show great promise for the management of CMDs by regulating numerous proteins and signaling pathways. The emergence of new technologies will considerably advance the pharmacological research and clinical translation of H2S.

Diagnosis and detection of pneumonia using weak-label based on X-ray images: a multi-center study

PURPOSE

Development and assessment the deep learning weakly supervised algorithm for the classification and detection pneumonia via X-ray.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed two publicly available dataset that contain X-ray images of pneumonia cases and normal cases. The first dataset from Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center. It contains a total of 5,856 X-ray images, which are divided into training, validation, and test sets with 8:1:1 ratio for algorithm training and testing. The deep learning algorithm ResNet34 was employed to build diagnostic model. And the second public dataset were collated by researchers from Qatar University and the University of Dhaka along with collaborators from Pakistan and Malaysia and some medical doctors. A total of 1,300 images of COVID-19 positive cases, 1,300 normal images and 1,300 images of viral pneumonia for external validation. Class activation map (CAM) were used to location the pneumonia lesions.

RESULTS

The ResNet34 model for pneumonia detection achieved an AUC of 0.9949 [0.9910-0.9981] (with an accuracy of 98.29% a sensitivity of 99.29% and a specificity of 95.57%) in the test dataset. And for external validation dataset, the model obtained an AUC of 0.9835[0.9806-0.9864] (with an accuracy of 94.62%, a sensitivity of 92.35% and a specificity of 99.15%). Moreover, the CAM can accurately locate the pneumonia area.

CONCLUSION

The deep learning algorithm can accurately detect pneumonia and locate the pneumonia area based on weak supervision information, which can provide potential value for helping radiologists to improve their accuracy of detection pneumonia patients through X-ray images.

AI support for accurate and fast radiological diagnosis of COVID-19: an international multicenter, multivendor CT study

OBJECTIVES

Differentiation between COVID-19 and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in computed tomography (CT) is a task that can be performed by human radiologists and artificial intelligence (AI). The present study aims to (1) develop an AI algorithm for differentiating COVID-19 from CAP and (2) evaluate its performance. (3) Evaluate the benefit of using the AI result as assistance for radiological diagnosis and the impact on relevant parameters such as accuracy of the diagnosis, diagnostic time, and confidence.

METHODS

We included n = 1591 multicenter, multivendor chest CT scans and divided them into AI training and validation datasets to develop an AI algorithm (n = 991 CT scans; n = 462 COVID-19, and n = 529 CAP) from three centers in China. An independent Chinese and German test dataset of n = 600 CT scans from six centers (COVID-19 / CAP; n = 300 each) was used to test the performance of eight blinded radiologists and the AI algorithm. A subtest dataset (180 CT scans; n = 90 each) was used to evaluate the radiologists' performance without and with AI assistance to quantify changes in diagnostic accuracy, reporting time, and diagnostic confidence.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy of the AI algorithm in the Chinese-German test dataset was 76.5%. Without AI assistance, the eight radiologists' diagnostic accuracy was 79.1% and increased with AI assistance to 81.5%, going along with significantly shorter decision times and higher confidence scores.

CONCLUSION

This large multicenter study demonstrates that AI assistance in CT-based differentiation of COVID-19 and CAP increases radiological performance with higher accuracy and specificity, faster diagnostic time, and improved diagnostic confidence.

KEY POINTS

• AI can help radiologists to get higher diagnostic accuracy, make faster decisions, and improve diagnostic confidence. • The China-German multicenter study demonstrates the advantages of a human-machine interaction using AI in clinical radiology for diagnostic differentiation between COVID-19 and CAP in CT scans.

Radiation Recall Pneumonitis: The Open Challenge in Differential Diagnosis of Pneumonia Induced by Oncological Treatments

The treatment of primary and secondary lung neoplasms now sees the fundamental role of radiotherapy, associated with surgery and systemic therapies. The improvement in survival outcomes has also increased attention to the quality of life, treatment compliance and the management of side effects. The role of imaging is not only limited to recognizing the efficacy of treatment but also to identifying, as soon as possible, the uncommon effects, especially when more treatments, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy and radiotherapy, are associated. Radiation recall pneumonitis is an uncommon treatment complication that should be correctly characterized, and it is essential to recognize the mechanisms of radiation recall pneumonitis pathogenesis and diagnostic features in order to promptly identify them and adopt the best therapeutic strategy, with the shortest possible withdrawal of the current oncological drug. In this setting, artificial intelligence could have a critical role, although a larger patient data set is required.

Morphological appearance of the B.1.1.7 mutation of the novel coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in chest CT

Background

Diagnosing a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection with high specificity in chest computed tomography (CT) imaging is considered possible due to distinctive imaging features of COVID-19 pneumonia. Since other viral non-COVID pneumonia show mostly a different distribution pattern, it is reasonable to assume that the patterns observed caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are a consequence of its genetically encoded molecular properties when interacting with the respiratory tissue. As more mutations of the initial SARS-CoV-2 wild-type with varying aggressiveness have been detected in the course of 2021, it became obvious that its genome is in a state of transformation and therefore a potential modification of the specific morphological appearance in CT may occur. The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the morphological differences of the SARS-CoV-2-B.1.1.7 mutation and wildtype variant in CT scans of the thorax.

Methods

We analyzed a dataset of 140 patients, which was divided into pneumonias caused by n=40 wildtype variants, n=40 B.1.1.7 variants, n=20 bacterial pneumonias, n=20 viral (non-COVID) pneumonias, and a test group of n=20 unremarkable CT examinations of the thorax. Semiautomated 3D segmentation of the lung tissue was performed for quantification of lung pathologies. The extent, ratio, and specific distribution of inflammatory affected lung tissue in each group were compared in a multivariate group analysis.

Results

Lung segmentation revealed significant difference between the extent of ground glass opacities (GGO) or consolidation comparing SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and B.1.1.7 variant. Wildtype and B.1.1.7 variant showed both a symmetric distribution pattern of stage-dependent GGO and consolidation within matched COVID-19 stages. Viral non-COVID pneumonias had significantly fewer consolidations than the bacterial, but also than the COVID-19 B.1.1.7 variant groups.

Conclusions

CT based segmentation showed no significant difference between the morphological appearance of the COVID-19 wild-type variant and the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 mutation. However, our approach allowed a semiautomatic quantification of bacterial and viral lung pathologies. Quantitative CT image analyses, such as the one presented, appear to be an important component of pandemic preparedness considering an organism with ongoing genetic change, to describe a potential arising change in CT morphological appearance of possible new upcoming COVID-19 variants of concern.

Imaging Severity COVID-19 Assessment in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients: Comparison of the Different Variants in a High Volume Italian Reference Center

Purpose: To analyze the vaccine effect by comparing five groups: unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant, unvaccinated patients with Delta variant, vaccinated patients with Delta variant, unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, and vaccinated patients with Omicron variant, assessing the “gravity” of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement, based on CT findings in critically ill patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: Patients were selected by ICU database considering the period from December 2021 to 23 March 2022, according to the following inclusion criteria: patients with proven Omicron variant COVID-19 infection with known COVID-19 vaccination with at least two doses and with chest Computed Tomography (CT) study during ICU hospitalization. Wee also evaluated the ICU database considering the period from March 2020 to December 2021, to select unvaccinated consecutive patients with Alpha variant, subjected to CT study, consecutive unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with Delta variant, subjected to CT study, and, consecutive unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, subjected to CT study. CT images were evaluated qualitatively using a severity score scale of 5 levels (none involvement, mild: ≤25% of involvement, moderate: 26−50% of involvement, severe: 51−75% of involvement, and critical involvement: 76−100%) and quantitatively, using the Philips IntelliSpace Portal clinical application CT COPD computer tool. For each patient the lung volumetry was performed identifying the percentage value of aerated residual lung volume. Non-parametric tests for continuous and categorical variables were performed to assess statistically significant differences among groups. Results: The patient study group was composed of 13 vaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron V). As control groups we identified: 20 unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant (Alpha NV); 20 unvaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta NV); 18 vaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta V); and 20 unvaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron NV). No differences between the groups under examination were found (p value > 0.05 at Chi square test) in terms of risk factors (age, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, immunosuppression, chronic kidney, cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, and liver disease, etc.). A different median value of aerated residual lung volume was observed in the Delta variant groups: median value of aerated residual lung volume was 46.70% in unvaccinated patients compared to 67.10% in vaccinated patients. In addition, in patients with Delta variant every other extracted volume by automatic tool showed a statistically significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated group. Statistically significant differences were observed for each extracted volume by automatic tool between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant of COVID-19. Good statistically significant correlations among volumes extracted by automatic tool for each lung lobe and overall radiological severity score were obtained (ICC range 0.71−0.86). GGO was the main sign of COVID-19 lesions on CT images found in 87 of the 91 (95.6%) patients. No statistically significant differences were observed in CT findings (ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidation or crazy paving sign) among patient groups. Conclusion: In our study, we showed that in critically ill patients no difference were observed in terms of severity of disease or exitus, between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients. The only statistically significant differences were observed, with regard to the severity of COVID-19 pulmonary parenchymal involvement, between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant, and between unvaccinated patients with Delta variant and vaccinated patients with Delta variant.

Pulmonary Lymphangitis Poses a Major Challenge for Radiologists in an Oncological Setting during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Due to the increasing number of COVID-19-infected and vaccinated individuals, radiologists continue to see patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis and recall pneumonitis, which could result in additional workups and false-positive results. Moreover, cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy may show therapy-related pneumonitis during imaging management. This is otherwise known as immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis. Following on from this background, radiologists should seek to know their patients' COVID-19 infection and vaccination history. Knowing the imaging features related to COVID-19 infection and vaccination is critical to avoiding misleading results and alarmism in patients and clinicians.