Axillary lymph node characteristics in breast cancer patients versus post-COVID-19 vaccination: Overview of current evidence per imaging modality

Differences in axillary ultrasound protocols among prospective de-escalating axillary surgical staging trials in clinically node negative early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical axillary staging of the axilla is a topic of debate regarding the potential of de-escalation in clinically node negative (cN0) early breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Axillary ultrasound is important to determine clinical nodal status. The aim of the current narrative review is to provide an overview of prospective trials on de-escalating axillary surgical staging in cN0 early breast cancer patients, with an emphasis on axillary ultrasound protocols.

METHODS

This narrative review provides an overview of the prospective de-escalating axillary surgical staging trials, in terms of comparing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus complete omission of SLNB, in cT1/2N0 patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Information from each trial was collected, including reported axillary ultrasound protocols (including cortical thickness cut-off value) and axillary ultrasound-guided biopsy technique (fine-needle aspiration or core-needle biopsy).

RESULTS

There is one recently published prospective trial and three ongoing prospective trials within the topic of this narrative review. Number of included patients in these trials ranges from 1405 to 5505 patients. The included trials differed whether or not to include patients with suspicious axillary ultrasound findings and a negative ultrasound-guided biopsy. Cortical thickness cut-off value ranged from 2.3 mm to 3.0 mm. Different ultrasound-guided biopsy techniques were performed among the included trials.

CONCLUSION

Prospective de-escalating axillary surgical staging trials in clinically node negative early breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy do report differences in terms of axillary ultrasound protocols and ultrasound-guided biopsy techniques. Axillary ultrasound protocols do require uniformity in order to improve extrapolation of these trial results.

Examination of iatrogenic FDG accumulation after COVID-19 vaccination

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the frequency of COVID-19 vaccine-induced reactive change and potential factors including blood type correlated with increased FDG uptake on positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 284 patients who underwent PET/CT between June and September 2021 and had a known history of COVID-19 vaccination. Information on the injection site, vaccine type, and adverse reactions was obtained. We visually assessed the presence or absence of accumulation in the axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes and the deltoid muscles. We measured the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) using semi-quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

Our study included 158 males and 126 females aged 16-94. The median time between vaccination and PET/CT was 9 and 42 days for patients who had received their first and second doses, respectively. We observed axillary lymph node accumulation, supraclavicular lymph node accumulation, and deltoid muscle accumulation in 98 (SUVmax 1.07-25.1), nine (SUVmax 2.28-14.5), and 33 cases (SUVmax 0.93-7.42), respectively. In cases with axillary lymph node (P = 0.0057) or deltoid muscle (P = 0.047) accumulation, the shorter the time since vaccination, the higher the FDG accumulation. Patients with axillary lymph node accumulation were significantly younger (P < 0.0001) and had a significantly higher frequency of adverse reactions such as fever (P < 0.0001) and myalgia (P = 0.002). No significant relationship was observed between blood type and the frequency of FDG accumulation. Logistic regression analysis also showed that age, gender, days since vaccination, and adverse reactions such as fever and myalgia were important factors for axillary lymph node accumulation.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that FDG accumulation in the axillary lymph nodes and deltoid muscle was higher within a shorter time after vaccination, and axillary lymph node accumulation was higher in young patients, females, and those with adverse reactions of fever and myalgia. No significant relationship was observed between blood type and the frequency of FDG accumulation. Confirming the vaccination status, time since vaccination, and the presence of adverse reactions before PET may reduce false positives.

Comparison of Axillary Lymph Nodes on Breast MRI Before and After COVID-19 Booster Vaccination

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Vaccine-related lymphadenopathy is a frequent finding following initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, but the frequency after COVID-19 booster vaccination is still unknown. In this study we compare axillary lymph node morphology on breast MRI before and after COVID-19 booster vaccination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, IRB-approved study included patients who underwent breast MRI between October 2021 and December 2021 after the COVID-19 booster vaccination. The axillary lymph node with the greatest cortical thickness ipsilateral to the side of vaccination was measured on MRI after booster vaccination and before initial COVID-19 vaccination. Comparisons were made between patients with and without increase in cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm. Continuous covariates were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and categorical covariates were compared using Fisher's exact test. Multiple comparison adjustment was made using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.

RESULTS

All 128 patients were included. Twenty-four of 128 (19%) displayed an increase in lymph node cortical thickness of ≥ 0.2 cm. Patients who received the booster more recently were more likely to present cortical thickening, with a median of 9 days (IQR 5, 20) vs. 36 days (IQR 18, 59) (p < 0.001). Age (p = 0.5) and type of vaccine (p = 0.7) were not associated with thickening. No ipsilateral breast cancer or malignant lymphadenopathy were diagnosed on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Axillary lymphadenopathy on breast MRI following COVID-19 booster vaccination is a frequent finding, especially in the first 3 weeks after vaccination. Additional evaluation or follow-up may be omitted in patients with low concern for malignancy.

Dual-Energy CT Material Decomposition: The Value in the Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis from Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based material decomposition algorithm for iodine quantification and fat fraction analysis to detect lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

30 female patients (mean age, 63.12 ± 14.2 years) diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent pre-operative chest DECT were included. To establish a reference standard, the study correlated histologic repots after lymphadenectomy or confirming metastasis in previous/follow-up examinations. Iodine concentration and fat fraction were determined through region-of-interest measurements on venous DECT iodine maps. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to identify the optimal threshold for differentiating between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes.

RESULTS

A total of 168 lymph nodes were evaluated, divided into axillary (metastatic: 46, normal: 101) and intramammary (metastatic: 10, normal: 11). DECT-based fat fraction values exhibited significant differences between metastatic (9.56 ± 6.20%) and non-metastatic lymph nodes (41.52 ± 19.97%) (p < 0.0001). Absolute iodine concentrations showed no significant differences (2.25 ± 0.97 mg/mL vs. 2.08 ± 0.97 mg/mL) (p = 0.7999). The optimal fat fraction threshold for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes was determined to be 17.75%, offering a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

DECT fat fraction analysis emerges as a promising method for identifying metastatic lymph nodes, overcoming the morpho-volumetric limitations of conventional CT regarding lymph node assessment. This innovative approach holds potential for improving pre-operative lymph node evaluation in breast cancer patients, offering enhanced diagnostic accuracy.

Predictive value for axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: Based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics of the primary lesion and sentinel lymph node

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characteristics based on primary lesion combined with lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS) patterns of SLN in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) with T1-2N0 breast cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in 118 patients with clinically confirmed T1-2N0 breast cancer. Conventional ultrasound (CUS) and CEUS characteristics of the primary lesion and enhancement patterns of SLN were recorded. The risk factors associated with ALNM were selected by univariate and binary logistic regression analysis, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn for the evaluation of predictive ALNM metastasis performance.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that age, HER-2 status, tumor size, nutrient vessels, extended range of enhancement lesion, and the enhancement patterns of SLN were significant predictive features of ALNM. Further binary logistic regression analysis indicated that the extended range of enhancement lesion (p <  0.001) and the enhancement patterns of SLN (p <  0.001) were independent risk factors for ALNM. ROC analysis showed that the AUC of the combination of these two indicators for predicting ALNM was 0.931 (95% CI: 0.887-0.976, sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 99.8%).

CONCLUSION

The CEUS characteristics of primary lesion combined with enhancement patterns of SLN are highly valuable in predicting ALNM and can guide clinical axillary surgery decision-making in early breast cancer.

Axillary lymph nodes enlargement after Sars-CoV-2 vaccine in patients undergoing breast examination: a single-centre experience in 285 women

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of axillary lymphadenopathy over established time ranges after COVID-19 vaccination and lymph node pathologic features (i.e. size increase and qualitative characteristics) in subjects undergoing axillary evaluation during a breast imaging examination.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The institutional review board approved this prospective study.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

women undergoing mammography and breast ultrasound between July and October 2021; information about the COVID-19 vaccine and infection, if any.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

known metastatic lymphadenopathy. Participants were divided into 5 subgroups according to time between vaccine and imaging: < 6 weeks; 7-8 weeks; 9-10 weeks; 11-12 weeks; > 12 weeks. Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes was performed with ultrasound. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 285 women were included. Most of the patients underwent Moderna vaccine (n = 175, 61.4%). 63/285 patients had a previous history of breast cancer (22.1%). 13/17 (76.5%) patients with previous COVID-19 infection had no previous history of cancer, whereas 4/17 had a previous history of cancer (p < .001). 41/285 (14.4%) women showed lymphadenopathy, and they were significantly younger (46.9 ± 11.6 years) than women with borderline (54.0 ± 11.9 years) or no lymphadenopathy (57.3 ± 11.9 years) (p < .001). Lymphadenopathy and borderline lymphadenopathy were more frequently observed in the Moderna-vaccinated women and in the subgroup of patients evaluated < 6 weeks after vaccination (p < 0.001). The most common pathologic feature was cortical thickening, followed by complete or partial effacement of fatty hilum.

CONCLUSION

A lymphadenopathy within 12 weeks after vaccination is a common finding particularly in younger women and after Moderna vaccine and no further assessment should be required.

[18F]FES PET Resolves the Diagnostic Dilemma of COVID-19-Vaccine-Associated Hypermetabolic Lymphadenopathy in ER-Positive Breast Cancer

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination is known to cause a diagnostic dilemma due to false-positive findings on [¹⁸F]FDG PET in vaccine-associated hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy. We present two case reports of women with estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive cancer of the breast who were vaccinated for COVID-19 in the deltoid muscle. [¹⁸F]FDG positron emission tomography (PET) demonstrated primary breast cancer and multiple axillary lymph nodes with increased [¹⁸F]FDG uptake, diagnosed as vaccine-associated [¹⁸F]FDG-avid lymph nodes. Subsequent [¹⁸F]FES PET revealed single axillary lymph node metastasis in the vaccine-associated [¹⁸F]FDG-avid lymph nodes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing the usefulness of [¹⁸F]FES PET in diagnosing axillary lymph node metastasis in COVID-19-vaccinated patients harboring ER-positive breast cancer. Thus, [¹⁸F]FES PET has potential applications in the detection of true-positive metastatic lymph nodes in patients with ER-positive breast cancer regardless of the ipsilateral or contralateral side, who have received COVID-19 vaccination.

Contrast-enhanced lymphatic US can improve the preoperative diagnostic performance for sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the preoperative diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced lymphatic ultrasound (CEUS) for the sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in early breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively recruited 102 consecutive patients with clinically node-negative early breast cancer from July 2021 to October 2021. All patients underwent conventional US and percutaneous CEUS examinations. The CEUS of SLNs were classified into four enhancement patterns: homogeneous (I), featured inhomogeneous (II), focal defect (III), and no enhancement (IV). The diagnostic performance of conventional US and CEUS for SLN metastasis was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curves.

RESULTS

A total of 78 women were enrolled in this study, including 55, 18, and 5 patients with negative axilla, 1-2, and ≥ 3 metastastic SLNs pathologically, respectively. The identification rate of SLNs by CEUS was 100%. Patterns I and II can select 91.7% (44/48) of patients with disease-free axilla, while patterns III and IV had higher percentages of metastasis (65.2%, p < 0.001 and 57.1%, p < 0.002, respectively). For the SLN metastatic burden, 100% (48/48) of patients with pattern I/II had ≤ 2 metastatic SLNs. Compared with conventional US, the CEUS enhancement patterns showed significant improvement in diagnosing metastatic SLNs (0.813 vs 0.601, p < 0.001). CEUS had greater clinical benefits and correctly reclassified 48% of metastatic SLNs (p < 0.001) without sacrificing the classification accuracy of negative SLNs (p = 0.25), and could improve prediction accuracy by 0.42 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS demonstrated better diagnostic performance and greater clinical benefits than conventional US for the preoperative diagnosis of SLNs, showing its potential to select candidates for precluding axillary surgery in early breast cancer.

KEY POINTS

• The homogeneous and featured inhomogeneous enhancement of SLNs are highly suggestive of negative LNs, while focal defect (p < 0.001) and no enhancement (p < 0.002) patterns had higher percentages of metastasis. • The proportion of SLNs with highly suspicious signs on conventional US increases as the type of enhancement pattern increases (no suspicious signs in pattern I/II, 34.8% in pattern III, and 85.7% in pattern IV). • Compared with conventional US, CEUS improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.813 vs. 0.601, p < 0.001) and had greater clinical benefits (IDI = 0.42, p < 0.001) for the diagnosis of axillary metastasis.

Oncology and cardiology positron emission tomography/computed tomography faced with COVID-19: A review of available literature data

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced people to significantly change their lifestyles and attitudes, and has greatly burdened healthcare delivery systems worldwide. The redistribution of the medical delivery system to maintain normal medical care while responding generously to COVID-19 is a continuing challenge that weighs heavily on medical institutions. Among imaging modalities, chest X-rays and computed tomography (CT) examinations have clearly made a large contribution to treatment of COVID-19. In contrast, it is difficult to express the standpoint of nuclear medicine examinations in a straightforward manner, as the greatest emphasis in this modality has been on how necessary medical care can continue to be provided. Many clinical reports of nuclear medicine examinations related to COVID-19 have been published, and knowledge continues to accumulate. This review provides a summary of the current state of oncology and cardiology positron emission tomography (PET) examinations related to COVID-19, and includes preparation of the nuclear medicine department, trends in PET examinations, specific imaging findings on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT, imaging of complications of COVID-19, PET tracers other than FDG, and the effects of vaccines on PET imaging findings.