Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures: Comparison and correlation of radiomics and deep learning frameworks based on spinal CT and clinical characteristics

Artificial intelligence in risk prediction and diagnosis of vertebral fractures

With the increasing prevalence of vertebral fractures, accurate diagnosis and prognostication are essential. This study assesses the effectiveness of AI in diagnosing and predicting vertebral fractures through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search across major databases selected studies utilizing AI for vertebral fracture diagnosis or prognosis. Out of 14,161 studies initially identified, 79 were included, with 40 undergoing meta-analysis. Diagnostic models were stratified by pathology: non-pathological vertebral fractures, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, and vertebral compression fractures. The primary outcome measure was AUROC. AI showed high accuracy in diagnosing and predicting vertebral fractures: predictive AUROC = 0.82, osteoporotic vertebral fracture diagnosis AUROC = 0.92, non-pathological vertebral fracture diagnosis AUROC = 0.85, and vertebral compression fracture diagnosis AUROC = 0.87, all significant (p < 0.001). Traditional models had the highest median AUROC (0.90) for fracture prediction, while deep learning models excelled in diagnosing all fracture types. High heterogeneity (I² > 99%, p < 0.001) indicated significant variation in model design and performance. AI technologies show considerable promise in improving the diagnosis and prognostication of vertebral fractures, with high accuracy. However, observed heterogeneity and study biases necessitate further research. Future efforts should focus on standardizing AI models and validating them across diverse datasets to ensure clinical utility.

Machine learning value in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML) in detecting vertebral fractures, considering varying fracture classifications, patient populations, and imaging approaches.

METHOD

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to December 31, 2023, for studies using ML for vertebral fracture diagnosis. Bias risk was assessed using QUADAS-2. A bivariate mixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were performed according to five task types (vertebral fractures, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures, differentiation of acute and chronic vertebral fractures, and prediction of vertebral fractures). Subgroup analyses were conducted by different ML models (including ML and DL) and modeling methods (including CT, X-ray, MRI, and clinical features).

RESULTS

Eighty-one studies were included. ML demonstrated a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.95 for vertebral fractures. Subgroup analysis showed that DL (SROC 0.98) and CT (SROC 0.98) performed best overall. For osteoporotic fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.96, with DL (SROC 0.99) and X-ray (SROC 0.99) performing better. For differentiating benign from malignant fractures, ML achieved a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with DL (SROC 0.96) and MRI (SROC 0.97) performing best. For differentiating acute from chronic vertebral fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with ML (SROC 0.96) and CT (SROC 0.97) performing best. For predicting vertebral fractures, ML had a sensitivity of 0.76 and specificity of 0.87, with ML (SROC 0.80) and clinical features (SROC 0.86) performing better.

CONCLUSIONS

ML, especially DL models applied to CT, MRI, and X-ray, shows high diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fractures. ML also effectively predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures, aiding in tailored prevention strategies. Further research and validation are required to confirm ML's clinical efficacy.

Leveraging 3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Accurate Recognition and Localization of Ankle Fractures

Background

Ankle fractures are common injuries with substantial implications for patient mobility and quality of life. Traditional imaging methods, while standard, have limitations in detecting subtle fractures and distinguishing them from complex bone structures. The advent of 3D Convolutional Neural Networks (3D-CNNs) offers a promising avenue for enhancing the accuracy and reliability of ankle fracture diagnoses.

Methods

In this study, we acquired 1453 high-resolution CT scans and processed them through three distinct 3D-CNN models: 3D-Mobilenet, 3D-Resnet101, and 3D-EfficientNetB7. Our approach involved meticulous preprocessing of images, including normalization and resampling, followed by a systematic comparative evaluation of the models based on accuracy, Area Under the Curve (AUC), and recall metrics. Additionally, the integration of Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) provided visual interpretability of the models' predictive focus points.

Results

The 3D-EfficientNetB7 model outperformed the other models, achieving an accuracy of 0.91 and an AUC of 0.94 after 20 training epochs. It demonstrated particularly effective in the accurate detection and localization of subtle and complex fractures. Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed the model's focus on clinically relevant areas, aligning with expert assessments and enhancing trust in automated diagnostics. Spatial localization techniques were pivotal in improving interpretability, offering clear visual guidance for pinpointing fracture sites.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the effectiveness of the 3D-EfficientNetB7 model in diagnosing ankle fractures, supported by robust performance metrics and enhanced visualization tools.

Predicting craniofacial fibrous dysplasia growth status: an exploratory study of a hybrid radiomics and deep learning model based on computed tomography images

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop 3 models based on computed tomography (CT) images of patients with craniofacial fibrous dysplasia (CFD): a radiomics model (Model Rad), a deep learning (DL) model (Model DL), and a hybrid radiomics and DL model (Model Rad+DL), and evaluate the ability of these models to distinguish between adolescents with active lesion progression and adults with stable lesion progression.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed preoperative CT scans from 148 CFD patients treated at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. The images were processed using 3D-Slicer software to segment and extract regions of interest for radiomics and DL analysis. Feature selection was performed using t-tests, mutual information, correlation tests, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm to develop the 3 models. Model accuracy was evaluated using measurements including the area under the curve (AUC) derived from receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to evaluate clinical benefits.

RESULTS

In total, 1,130 radiomics features and 512 DL features were successfully extracted. Model Rad+DL demonstrated superior AUC values compared to Model Rad and Model DL in the training and validation sets. DCA revealed that Model Rad+DL offered excellent clinical benefits when the threshold probability exceeded 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Model Rad+DL exhibits superior potential in evaluating CFD progression, determining the optimal surgical timing for adult CFD patients.

Machine learning models based on CT radiomics features for distinguishing benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures in patients with malignant tumors

BACKGROUND

Radiomics has become an important tool for distinguishing benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). It is more clinically significant to concentrate on patients who have malignant tumors and differentiate between benign and malignant VCFs.

PURPOSE

To explore the value of multiple machine learning (ML) models based on CT radiomics features for differentiating benign and malignant VCFs in patients with malignant tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 78 patients with malignant tumors accompanied by VCFs, 45 patients with benign VCFs, and 33 patients with malignant VCFs. A total of 140 lesions (86 benign lesions, 54 malignant lesions) were ultimately included in this study. All patients were divided into training sets (n = 98) and validation sets (n = 42) according to the 7:3 ratio. The radiomics features were screened and dimensioned, and multiple radiomics ML models were constructed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to assess the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Five radiomics features were included in the model. All the ML models built have good diagnostic efficiency, among which the support vector machine (SVM) model performs better. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the training set were 0.908, 0.816, 0.883, and 0.857, respectively, while those in the validation set were 0.911, 0.647, 0.92, and 0.81, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A variety of ML models built based on CT radiomics features have good value for differentiating benign and malignant VCFs in malignant tumor patients, and the SVM model has a better performance.

Differential diagnostic value of radiomics models in benign versus malignant vertebral compression fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Early diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures by analyzing imaging data is crucial to guide treatment and assess prognosis, and the development of radiomics made it an alternative option to biopsy examination. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the purpose of quantifying the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.

METHODS

Searching on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify eligible studies published before September 23, 2023. After evaluating for methodological quality and risk of bias using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), we selected studies providing confusion matrix results to be included in random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of sixteen articles, involving 1,519 vertebrae with pathological-diagnosed tumor infiltration, were included in our meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity and specificity of the top-performing models were 0.92 (95 % CI: 0.87-0.96) and 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.88-0.96), respectively. Their AUC was 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.96-0.99). By contrast, radiologists' combined sensitivity was 0.90 (95 %CI: 0.75-0.97) and specificity was 0.92 (95 %CI: 0.67-0.98). The AUC was 0.96 (95 %CI: 0.94-0.97). Subsequent subgroup analysis and sensitivity test suggested that part of the heterogeneity might be explained by differences in imaging modality, segmentation, deep learning and cross-validation.

CONCLUSION

We found remarkable diagnosis potential in correctly distinguishing vertebral compression fractures in complex clinical contexts. However, the published radiomics models still have a great heterogeneity, and more large-scale clinical trials are essential to validate their generalizability.

Oncologic Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning Methods in CT Spine Imaging-A Systematic Review

In spinal oncology, integrating deep learning with computed tomography (CT) imaging has shown promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and patient outcomes. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on artificial intelligence (AI) applications in CT imaging for spinal tumors. A PRISMA-guided search identified 33 studies: 12 (36.4%) focused on detecting spinal malignancies, 11 (33.3%) on classification, 6 (18.2%) on prognostication, 3 (9.1%) on treatment planning, and 1 (3.0%) on both detection and classification. Of the classification studies, 7 (21.2%) used machine learning to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, 3 (9.1%) evaluated tumor stage or grade, and 2 (6.1%) employed radiomics for biomarker classification. Prognostic studies included three (9.1%) that predicted complications such as pathological fractures and three (9.1%) that predicted treatment outcomes. AI's potential for improving workflow efficiency, aiding decision-making, and reducing complications is discussed, along with its limitations in generalizability, interpretability, and clinical integration. Future directions for AI in spinal oncology are also explored. In conclusion, while AI technologies in CT imaging are promising, further research is necessary to validate their clinical effectiveness and optimize their integration into routine practice.

Integrating intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics with deep transfer learning for DCE-MRI breast lesion differentiation: A multicenter study comparing performance with radiologists

PURPOSE

To conduct the fusion of radiomics and deep transfer learning features from the intratumoral and peritumoral areas in breast DCE-MRI images to differentiate between benign and malignant breast tumors, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of this fusion model against the assessments made by experienced radiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multi-center study conducted a retrospective analysis of DCE-MRI images from 330 women diagnosed with breast cancer, with 138 cases categorized as benign and 192 as malignant. The training and internal testing sets comprised 270 patients from center 1, while the external testing cohort consisted of 60 patients from center 2. A fusion feature set consisting of radiomics features and deep transfer learning features was constructed from both intratumoral (ITR) and peritumoral (PTR) areas. The Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) based support vector machine was chosen as the classifier by comparing its performance with five other machine learning models. The diagnostic performance and clinical usefulness of fusion model were verified and assessed through the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and decision curve analysis. Additionally, the performance of the fusion model was compared with the diagnostic assessments of two experienced radiologists to evaluate its relative accuracy. The study strictly adhered to CLEAR and METRICS guidelines for standardization to ensure rigorous and reproducible methods.

RESULTS

The findings show that the fusion model, utilizing radiomics and deep transfer learning features from the ITR and PTR, exhibited exceptional performance in classifying breast tumors, achieving AUCs of 0.950 in the internal testing set and 0.921 in the external testing set. This performance significantly surpasses that of models relying on singular regional radiomics or deep transfer learning features alone. Moreover, the fusion model demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to the evaluations conducted by two experienced radiologists, thereby highlighting its potential to support and enhance clinical decision-making in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors.

CONCLUSION

The fusion model, combining multi-regional radiomics with deep transfer learning features, not only accurately differentiates between benign and malignant breast tumors but also outperforms the diagnostic assessments made by experienced radiologists. This underscores the model's potential as a valuable tool for improving the accuracy and reliability of breast tumor diagnosis.

Automatic Osteoporosis Screening System Using Radiomics and Deep Learning from Low-Dose Chest CT Images

OBJECTIVE

Develop two fully automatic osteoporosis screening systems using deep learning (DL) and radiomics (Rad) techniques based on low-dose chest CT (LDCT) images and evaluate their diagnostic effectiveness.

METHODS

In total, 434 patients who underwent LDCT and bone mineral density (BMD) examination were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the development set (n = 333) and temporal validation set (n = 101). An automatic thoracic vertebra cancellous bone (TVCB) segmentation model was developed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the segmentation performance. Furthermore, the three-class Rad and DL models were developed to distinguish osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal bone mass. The diagnostic performance of these models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The automatic segmentation model achieved excellent segmentation performance, with a mean DSC of 0.96 ± 0.02 in the temporal validation set. The Rad model was used to identify osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal BMD in the temporal validation set, with respective area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.943, 0.801, and 0.932. The DL model achieved higher AUC values of 0.983, 0.906, and 0.969 for the same categories in the same validation set. The Delong test affirmed that both models performed similarly in BMD assessment. However, the accuracy of the DL model is 81.2%, which is better than the 73.3% accuracy of the Rad model in the temporal validation set. Additionally, DCA indicated that the DL model provided a greater net benefit compared to the Rad model across the majority of the reasonable threshold probabilities Conclusions: The automated segmentation framework we developed can accurately segment cancellous bone on low-dose chest CT images. These predictive models, which are based on deep learning and radiomics, provided comparable diagnostic performance in automatic BMD assessment. Nevertheless, it is important to highlight that the DL model demonstrates higher accuracy and precision than the Rad model.

Value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT radiomics combined with clinical variables in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign vertebral compression fractures

BACKGROUND

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common clinical problems that arise from various reasons. The differential diagnosis of benign and malignant VCFs is challenging. This study was designed to develop and validate a radiomics model to predict benign and malignant VCFs with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT).

RESULTS

Twenty-six features (9 PET features and 17 CT features) and eight clinical variables (age, SUVmax, SUVpeak, SULmax, SULpeak, osteolytic destruction, fracture line, and appendices/posterior vertebrae involvement) were ultimately selected. The area under the curve (AUCs) of the radiomics and clinical-radiomics models were significantly different from that of the clinical model in both the training group (0.986, 0.987 vs. 0.884, p < 0.05) and test group (0.962, 0.948 vs. 0.858, p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference between the radiomics model and clinical-radiomics model (p > 0.05). The accuracies of the radiomics and clinical-radiomics models were 94.0% and 95.0% in the training group and 93.2% and 93.2% in the test group, respectively. The three models all showed good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p > 0.05). According to the decision curve analysis (DCA), the radiomics model and clinical-radiomics model exhibited higher overall net benefit than the clinical model.

CONCLUSIONS

The PET/CT-based radiomics and clinical-radiomics models showed good performance in distinguishing between malignant and benign VCFs. The radiomics method may be valuable for treatment decision-making.