Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging underestimates residual disease following neoadjuvant docetaxel based chemotherapy for breast cancer

Third national surgical consensus conference of the Italian Association of Breast Surgeons (ANISC) on management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: The difficulty in reaching a consensus

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has a profound impact on surgical management of breast cancer. For this reason, the Italian Association of Breast Surgeons (ANISC) promoted the third national Consensus Conference on this subject, open to multidisciplinary specialists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Consensus Conference was held on-line in November 2022, and after an introductory session with five core-team experts, participants were asked to vote on eleven controversial issues, while results were collected in real-time with a polling system.

RESULTS

A total of 164 dedicated specialists from 74 Breast Centers participated. Consensus was reached for only three of the eleven issues, including: 1) the indication to assess the response with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (79 %); 2) the need to re-assess the biological factors of the residual tumor if present (96 %); 3) the possibility of omitting a formal axillary node dissection for cN1 patients if a pathologic Complete Response (pCR) was confirmed with analysis of one or more sentinel lymph nodes (82 %). The majority voted in favor of mapping both the breast and nodal lesions pre-NAC (59 %), and against the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cN0 patients in the case of pathologic or clinical Complete Response (69 %). In cases of cT3/cN1+ tumors with pCR, only 8 % of participants considered appropriate the omission of Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy.

CONCLUSION

There is still a wide variability in surgical approaches after NAC in the "real world". As NAC is increasingly used, multidisciplinary teams should be attuned to conforming their procedures to the rapid advances in this field.

The Role of MRI in Breast Cancer and Breast Conservation Therapy

Contrast-enhanced breast MRI has an established role in aiding in the detection, evaluation, and management of breast cancer. This article discusses MRI sequences, the clinical utility of MRI, and how MRI has been evaluated for use in breast radiotherapy treatment planning. We highlight the contribution of MRI in the decision-making regarding selecting appropriate candidates for breast conservation therapy and review the emerging role of MRI-guided breast radiotherapy.

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Breast MRI: Applications in Breast Cancer Primary Treatment Response Assessment and Prediction

ABSTRACT

Primary systemic therapy (PST) is the treatment of choice in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is nowadays also often used in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Although imaging remains pivotal to assess response to PST accurately, the use of imaging to predict response to PST has the potential to not only better prognostication but also allow the de-escalation or omission of potentially toxic treatment with undesirable adverse effects, the accelerated implementation of new targeted therapies, and the mitigation of surgical delays in selected patients. In response to the limited ability of radiologists to predict response to PST via qualitative, subjective assessments of tumors on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), artificial intelligence-enhanced MRI with classical machine learning, and in more recent times, deep learning, have been used with promising results to predict response, both before the start of PST and in the early stages of treatment. This review provides an overview of the current applications of artificial intelligence to MRI in assessing and predicting response to PST, and discusses the challenges and limitations of their clinical implementation.

Optimizing surgical strategy in locally advanced breast cancer: a comparative analysis between preoperative MRI and postoperative pathology after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

In the treatment of breast cancer, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is often used as systemic treatment followed by tumor excision. In this context, planning the operation with regard to excision margins relies on tumor size measured by MRI. The actual tumor size can be determined through pathologic evaluation. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation and agreement between pre-operative MRI and postoperative pathological evaluation.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-three breast cancer patients that underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent breast surgery were retrospectively included between January 2013 and July 2016. Preoperative tumor diameters determined with MRI were compared with postoperative tumor diameters determined by pathological analysis. Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman agreement methods were used. Results were subjected to subgroup analysis based on histological subtype (ER, HER2, ductal, lobular).

RESULTS

The correlation between tumor size at MRI and pathology was 0.63 for the whole group, 0.39 for subtype ER + /HER2-, 0.51 for ER + /HER2 + , 0.63 for ER-/HER2 +, and 0.85 for ER-/HER2-. The mean difference and limits of agreement (LoA) between tumor size measured MRI vs. pathological assessment was 4.6 mm (LoA -27.0-36.3 mm, n = 195). Mean differences and LoA for subtype ER + /HER2- was 7.6 mm (LoA -31.3-46.5 mm, n = 100), for ER + /HER2 + 0.9 mm (LoA -8.5-10.2 mm, n = 33), for ER-/HER2+ -1.2 mm (LoA -5.1-7.5 mm, n = 21), and for ER-/HER- -0.4 mm (LoA -8.6-7.7 mm, n = 41).

CONCLUSION

HER2 + and ER-/HER2- tumor subtypes showed clear correlation and agreement between preoperative MRI and postoperative pathological assessment of tumor size. This suggests that MRI evaluation could be a suitable predictor to guide the surgical approach. Conversely, correlation and agreement for ER + /HER2- and lobular tumors was poor, evidenced by a difference in tumor size of up to 5 cm. Hence, we demonstrate that histological tumor subtype should be taken into account when planning breast conserving surgery after NAC.

The Role of MRI in Assessing Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the world. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the management of breast cancer is increasing. The decision about the management after NAC depends mainly on the tumor response to NAC.

OBJECTIVES

The role of the current study is to evaluate the role of the MRI scan in assessing the residual disease after NAC, which would help in decision making regarding the best treatment plan for the patient.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We did this retrospective review for all patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer in our center and had NAC over four years. All patients in our study had a post-NAC magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan to assess the residual tumor size. A 2×2 table was used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy, and SPSS software version 25 was used to get the correlation coefficients between the post-NAC MRI measurements and pathological size.

RESULTS

28 female patients were included in our study. The average age was 45.25 ± 10 years. We utilized the tumor size on histology as the standard for comparison. We calculated MRI sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV rates of 90.9%, 100%, 100%, and 94.4%, respectively. The correlation coefficient was strong (r = 0.859, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging is a good test to assess the residual tumor disease after NAC in breast cancer patients. However, cases of under- and overestimation are still seen, which require more caution when making a decision regarding the management of such cases.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer: 2022 Update

Imaging plays a vital role in managing patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as treatment decisions rely heavily on accurate assessment of response to therapy. This document provides evidence-based guidelines for imaging breast cancer before, during, and after initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Contrast-enhanced mammography in the assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment

PURPOSE

To investigate the utility of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) as an alternative to breast MRI for the evaluation of residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT).

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled consecutive women undergoing NAT for breast cancer from July 2017-July 2019. Breast MRI and CEM exams performed after completion of NAT were read independently by two breast radiologists. Residual disease and lesion size on MRI and CEM recombined (RI) and low-energy images (LEI) were compared. Histopathology was considered the reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed using McNemar's and Leisenring's tests. Multiple comparison adjustment was made using Bonferroni procedure. Lesion sizes were correlated using Kendall's tau coefficient.

RESULTS

There were 110 participants with 115 breast cancers. Residual disease (invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ) was detected in 83/115 (72%) lesions on pathology, 71/115 (62%) on MRI, 55/115 (48%) on CEM RI, and 75/115 (65%) on CEM LEI. When using multiple comparison adjustment, no significant differences were detected between MRI combined with CEM LEI and CEM RI combined with CEM LEI, in terms of accuracy (MRI: 77%, CEM: 72%; p ≥ 0.99), sensitivity (MRI: 88%, CEM: 81%; p ≥ 0.99), specificity (MRI: 47%, CEM: 50%; p ≥ 0.99), PPV (MRI: 81%, CEM: 81%; p ≥ 0.99), or NPV (MRI: 60%, CEM: 50%; p ≥ 0.99). Size correlation between pathology and both MRI combined with CEM LEI and CEM RI combined with CEM LEI was moderate: τ = 0. 36 vs 0.33 (p ≥ 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced mammography is an acceptable alternative to breast MRI for the detection of residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment.

High Dynamic Range Dual-Modal White Light Imaging Improves the Accuracy of Tumor Bed Sampling After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Accurate evaluation of residual cancer burden remains challenging because of the lack of appropriate techniques for tumor bed sampling. This study evaluated the application of a white light imaging system to help pathologists differentiate the components and location of tumor bed in specimens.

METHODS

The high dynamic range dual-mode white light imaging (HDR-DWI) system was developed to capture antiglare reflection and multiexposure HDR transmission images. It was tested in 60 specimens of modified radical mastectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. We observed the differential transmittance among tumor tissue, fibrosis tissue, and adipose tissue.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of HDR-DWI were compared with x-ray or visual examination to determine whether HDR-DWI was superior in identifying tumor beds. We found that tumor tissue had lower transmittance (0.12 ± 0.03) than fibers (0.15 ± 0.04) and fats (0.27 ± 0.07) (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-DWI was more sensitive in identifying fiber and tumor tissues than cabinet x-ray and visual observation (P < .01). In addition, HDR-DWI could identify more fibrosis areas than the currently used whole slide imaging did in 12 samples (12/60). We have determined that HDR-DWI can provide more in-depth tumor bed information than x-ray and visual examination do, which will help prevent diagnostic errors in tumor bed sampling.

Surgical Planning after Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Multimodality Imaging-Based Approach Focused on MRI

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) today represents a cornerstone in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer and highly chemo-sensitive tumors at early stages, increasing the possibilities of performing more conservative treatments and improving long term outcomes. Imaging has a fundamental role in the staging and prediction of the response to NACT, thus aiding surgical planning and avoiding overtreatment. In this review, we first examine and compare the role of conventional and advanced imaging techniques in preoperative T Staging after NACT and in the evaluation of lymph node involvement. In the second part, we analyze the different surgical approaches, discussing the role of axillary surgery, as well as the possibility of non-operative management after-NACT, which has been the subject of recent trials. Finally, we focus on emerging techniques that will change the diagnostic assessment of breast cancer in the near future.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for early prediction of response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely accepted as a primary treatment for inoperable or locally advanced breast cancer before definitive surgery. However, not all advanced breast cancers are sensitive to NAC. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has been considered to assess tumor response to NAC as it can effectively reflect the condition of blood perfusion and lesion size. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS to predict early response in different regions of interest in breast tumors under NAC treatment. This prospective study included 82 patients with advanced breast cancer. Parameters of TIC (time-intensive curve) between baseline and after the first cycle of NAC were calculated for the rate of relative change (Δ), including Δpeak, ΔTTP (time to peak), ΔRBV (regional blood volume), ΔRBF (regional blood flow) and ΔMTT (mean transit time). The responders and non-responders were distinguished by the Miller-Payne Grading (MPG) system and parameters from different regions of tumors were compared in these two groups. For ROI 1(the greatest enhancement area in the central region of the tumor), there were significant differences in Δpeak1, ΔRBV1 and ΔRBF1 between responders and non-responders. For ROI 2 (the greatest enhancement area on edge of the tumor), there were significant differences in Δpeak2 and ΔRBF2 between the groups. The Δpeak1 and ΔRBF2 showed good prediction (AUC 0.798-0.820, p ≤ 0.02) after the first cycle of NAC. When the cut-off value was 0.115, the ΔRBF2 had the highest diagnostic accuracy and the maximum NPV. Quantitative TIC parameters could be effectively used to evaluate early response to NAC in advanced breast cancer.

Staging Breast Cancer with MRI, the T. A Key Role in the Neoadjuvant Setting

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) indications have expanded from inoperable locally advanced to early-stage breast cancer. Achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) has been proven to be an excellent prognostic marker leading to better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Although diagnostic accuracy of MRI has been shown repeatedly to be superior to conventional methods in assessing the extent of breast disease there are still controversies regarding the indication of MRI in this setting. We intended to review the complex literature concerning the tumor size in staging, response and surgical planning in patients with early breast cancer receiving NACT, in order to clarify the role of MRI. Morphological and functional MRI techniques are making headway in the assessment of the tumor size in the staging, residual tumor assessment and prediction of response. Radiomics and radiogenomics MRI applications in the setting of the prediction of response to NACT in breast cancer are continuously increasing. Tailored therapy strategies allow considerations of treatment de-escalation in excellent responders and avoiding or at least postponing breast surgery in selected patients.

Imaging of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Pictorial Essay

ABSTRACT

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a promising noninvasive imaging technique for evaluating benign and malignant breast lesions, as contrast provides information about perfusion and microvasculature. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is currently off-label use in the breast in the United States, but its clinical and investigational use in breast imaging is gaining popularity. It is important for radiologists to be familiar with the imaging appearances of benign and malignant breast masses using contrast-enhanced ultrasound. This pictorial essay illustrates enhancement patterns of various breast masses from our own experience. Pathologies include subtypes of invasive breast cancer, fibroadenomas, papillary lesions, fibrocystic change, and inflammatory processes. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound pitfalls and limitations are discussed.

Assisted computer and imaging system improve accuracy of breast tumor size assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background

The use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with early breast cancer is becoming increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to explore the combined use of breast pathology cabinet X-ray system (CXS) to accurately assess the response to neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer and establish a standard evaluation system.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment were randomly selected. Preoperative imaging evaluation of tumor masses were significantly degenerated, and they were randomly divided into experimental and control groups of 50 cases each. Compared with the traditional two methods of material extraction, the effective material extraction rate is comparative. Take the two largest diameters of the largest two-dimensional surface of the tumor bed as the measurement object, the macro-description value is D1/D2, the radiographic system description measurement value is the experimental group d1/d2, and the correction under the microscope is worth the true size of the tumor bed H1/H2 as the final test standard, calculate the difference between D1/D2 and d1/d2 with H1 and H2, and compare the difference between d1− H1, d2 − H2 and D1− H1, D2 − H2.

Results

The average group of tissue samples in the experimental group was 16.4, and the average group of tissue samples in the control group was 16.7, and there was no difference between the two groups; The effective tissue blocks of tumor bed samples in the experimental group were11.8, and the control group was 7.5. There is difference between the two groups. The average effective percentage of tumor bed in the experimental group was 72%, and the average effective percentage of tumor bed in the control group was 44.8%. The difference was also statistically significant; d1− H1, d2 − H2 and D1− H1, D2 − H2 are all different.

Conclusions

CXS assists the collection of breast tumor bed, which can significantly improve the efficiency of tumor bed collection and save the cost of collection. Compared with the maximum diameter of the tumor bed by eyes, the CXS mapping value is closer to the value measured under the microscope.

Multivariable Models Based on Baseline Imaging Features and Clinicopathological Characteristics to Predict Breast Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer

Abstract Introduction Currently, the accurate evaluation and prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains a great challenge. We developed several multivariate models based on baseline imaging features and clinicopathological characteristics to predict the breast pathologic complete response (pCR). Methods We retrospectively collected clinicopathological and imaging data of patients who received NAC and subsequent surgery for breast cancer at our hospital from 2014 June till 2020 September. We used mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate the breast tumors at baseline. Results A total of 308 patients were included and 111 patients achieved pCR. The HER2 status and Ki-67 index were significant factors for pCR on univariate analysis and in all multivariate models. Among the prediction models in this study, the ultrasound-MRI model performed the best, producing an area under curve of 0.801 (95%CI=0.749-0.852), a sensitivity of 0.797 and a specificity of 0.676. Conclusion Among the multivariable models constructed in this study, the ultrasound plus MRI model performed the best in predicting the probability of pCR after NAC. Further validation is required before it is generalized.

Current and Future Directions of Breast MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive exam for detecting breast cancer. The American College of Radiology recommends women with 20% or greater lifetime risk of developing breast cancer be screened annually with MRI. However, other high-risk populations would also benefit. Hartmann et al. reported women with atypical hyperplasia have nearly a 30% incidence of breast cancer at 25-year follow-up. Women with dense breast tissue have up to a 4-fold increased risk of breast cancer when compared to average-risk women; their cancers are more likely to be mammographically occult. Because multiple cohorts of women are at high risk for developing breast cancer, there has been a movement to develop an abbreviated MRI (abMRI) protocol to expand the availability of MRI screening. Studies on abMRI effectiveness have been promising, with Weinstein et al. demonstrating a cancer detection rate of 27.4/1000 in women with dense breasts after a negative digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast MRI is also used to evaluate the extent of disease as part of preoperative assessment in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, and to assess a patient's response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This paper aims to explore the current uses of MRI and propose future indications and directions.

Management of the Axilla and the Breast After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Breast cancer is traditionally treated with surgery, plus adjuvant systemic therapy and radiotherapy as required. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for the treatment of breast cancer is used for locally advanced operable breast cancer to reduce the tumor size, to perform breast conserving surgery, and to perform a limited axillary approach. Adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer and even in inoperable breast cancer is used to increase overall survival time and to delay disease progression while relieving symptoms. NACT for breast cancer is a new strategy that was introduced toward the end of the 20^th century and is increasingly used in the treatment of breast cancer. At present, NACT is increasingly being used to reduce the need for axillary dissection and to convert patients with large tumors to candidates for breast conservation therapy in both locally advanced and operable breast cancers. Breast conserving procedures are currently more preferred by surgeons and axillary dissection is being replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy after chemotherapy. One of the targets of neoadjuvant systemic therapy is to try to perform a less aggressive surgery by breast conservation, mainly for cosmetic reasons and avoiding axillary dissection mainly for arm mobility, pain, and lymphedema risk. The other target of neoadjuvant systemic therapy is to see the response of the tumor to chemotherapy and determine the treatment accordingly. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy increases the rate of complete pathological response by clearing the breast and axilla from tumor cells before surgery. In this review, we examine the key points of using the NACT in breast cancer, considering radiological imaging methods, surgical management, and reconstruction after NACT.

Early response by MR imaging and ultrasound as predictor of pathologic complete response to 12-week neoadjuvant therapy for different early breast cancer subtypes: Combined analysis from the WSG ADAPT subtrials

We evaluated the role of early response after 3 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) assessed by ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Ki-67 dynamics for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) in different early breast cancer subtypes. Patients with HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ tumors enrolled into three neoadjuvant WSG ADAPT subtrials underwent US, MRI and Ki-67 assessment at diagnosis and after 3 weeks of NAT. Early response was defined as complete or partial response (US, MRI) and ≥30% proliferation decrease or <500 invasive tumor cells (Ki-67). Predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves for prediction of pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) after 12-week NAT were calculated. Two hundred twenty-six had MRI and 401 US; 107 underwent both MRI and US. All three methods yielded a similar AUC in HR+/HER2+ (0.66-0.67) and HR-/HER2- tumors (0.53-0.63), while MRI and Ki-67 performed better than US in HR-/HER2+ tumors (0.83 and 0.79 vs 0.56). Adding MRI+/-Ki-67 increased AUC of US in HR-/HER2+ tumors to 0.64 to 0.75. MRI and Ki-67 demonstrated highest sensitivity in HR-/HER2- (0.8-1) and HR-/HER2+ tumors (1, both). Negative predictive value was similar for all methods in HR+/HER2+ (0.71-0.74) and HR-/HER2- tumors (0.85-1), while it was higher for MRI and Ki-67 compared to US in HR-/HER2+ subtype (1 vs 0.5). Early response assessed by US, MRI and Ki-67 is a strong predictor for pCR after 12-week NAT. Strength of pCR prediction varies according to tumor subtype. Adding MRI+/-Ki-67 to US did not improve pCR prediction in majority of our patients.

Breast MRI for Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being used to treat early-stage triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor 2-overexpressing breast cancers, as well as locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancers. The rationales for neoadjuvant therapy are to shrink tumor size and potentially decrease the extent of surgery, to serve as an in vivo test of response to therapy, and to reveal prognostic information for the patient. MRI is the most accurate modality to demonstrate response to therapy and to help ensure accurate presurgical planning. Changes in lesion diameter, volume, and enhancement are used to predict complete response, partial response, or nonresponse to therapy. However, residual disease may be overestimated or underestimated at MRI. Fibrosis, necrotic tumors, and residual benign masses may be causes of overestimation of residual disease. Nonmass lesions, invasive lobular carcinoma, hormone receptor-positive tumors, nonconcentric shrinkage patterns, the use of antiangiogenic therapy, and late-enhancing foci may be causes of underestimation of residual disease. In patients with known axillary lymph node metastasis, neoadjuvant therapy may be followed by targeted axillary dissection to avoid the potential morbidity associated with an axillary lymph node dissection. Diffusion-weighted imaging, radiomics, machine learning, and deep learning methods are under investigation to improve MRI accuracy in predicting treatment response.^©RSNA, 2021.

Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for prediction of residual tumor size in early breast cancer within the ADAPT subtrials

Background

Prediction of histological tumor size by post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated in different breast cancer subtypes.

Methods

Imaging was performed after 12-week NAT in patients enrolled into three neoadjuvant WSG ADAPT subtrials. Imaging performance was analyzed for prediction of residual tumor measuring ≤10 mm and summarized using positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values.

Results

A total of 248 and 588 patients had MRI and ultrasound, respectively. Tumor size was over- or underestimated by < 10 mm in 4.4% and 21.8% of patients by MRI and in 10.2% and 15.8% by ultrasound. Overall, NPV (proportion of correctly predicted tumor size ≤10 mm) of MRI and ultrasound was 0.92 and 0.83; PPV (correctly predicted tumor size > 10 mm) was 0.52 and 0.61. MRI demonstrated a higher NPV and lower PPV than ultrasound in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and in HR−/HER2+ tumors. Both methods had a comparable NPV and PPV in HR−/HER2− tumors.

Conclusions

In HR+/HER2+ and HR−/HER2+ breast cancer, MRI is less likely than ultrasound to underestimate while ultrasound is associated with a lower risk to overestimate tumor size. These findings may help to select the most optimal imaging approach for planning surgery after NAT.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01815242 (registered on March 21, 2013), NCT01817452 (registered on March 25, 2013), and NCT01779206 (registered on January 30, 2013).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-021-01413-y.

Background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer: a review of the emerging evidences about its potential use as imaging biomarker

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review of evidences about the relationship between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of the contralateral healthy breast and breast cancer: its association with clinicopathological breast cancer characteristics, its potential as predictive and prognostic biomarker and the biological linkage between BPE and breast cancer.

METHODS

A computerized literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar was performed up to June 2020. Two authors independently conducted search, screening, quality assessment, and extraction of data from the eligible studies. Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.

RESULTS

Of the 476 articles identified, 22 articles met the inclusion criteria. No significant association was found between BPE and invasiveness, histological cancer type, T- and N-stage, multifocality, lymphatic and vascular invasion and histological tumour grade while the association between BPE and molecular subtypes is still unclear. As predictive biomarker, a greater decrease in BPE during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with pathological complete response. Results about the role of BPE as prognostic factor were inconsistent. An association between high BPE and microvessel density, CD34 and VEGF (histological markers of vascularization and angiogenesis) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

BPE of the contralateral breast is associated with breast cancer in several aspects, therefore it has been proposed as a tool to refine breast cancer decision-making process.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Additional researches with standardized BPE assessment are needed to translate this emerging biomarker into clinical practice in the era of personalized medicine.

The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Pathologic Response Prediction in Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To determine the overall performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions and in predicting the pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer (BC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Articles published up to April 2019 were systematically searched in Medline, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The sensitivities and specificities across studies, the calculations of positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR⁺ and LR^-), diagnostic odds ratio (OR), and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves were determined. Methodologic quality was assessed using the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool. Subgroup analyses and metaregression were performed on prespecified study-level characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies involving 4875 patients with 5246 breast lesions and 10 studies involving 462 patients with BC receiving NAC were included. Methodologic quality was relatively high, and no publication bias was detected. The overall sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic OR, LR⁺, and LR^- for CEUS were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.89), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.80-0.83), 30.55 (95% CI, 21.40-43.62), 4.29 (95% CI, 3.51-5.25), and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.13-0.21), respectively, showing statistical heterogeneity. Multivariable metaregression analysis showed contrast mode to be the most significant source of heterogeneity. The overall sensitivity, specificity, LR⁺, LR, and diagnostic OR of CEUS imaging in predicting the overall pathologic response to NAC in patients with BC were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.93), 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.88), 4.49 (95% CI, 3.04-6.62), 0.16 (95% CI, 0.10-0.24,), and 32.21 (95% CI, 16.74-62.01), respectively, showing mild heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirmed the excellent performance of breast CEUS in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions as well as pathologic response prediction in patients with BC receiving NAC.

MRI does not predict pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study assessed whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could accurately predict pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients receiving standardized treatment, pre- and post-NAC MRI on the same instrumentation using a consistent imaging protocol, interpreted by a single breast fellowship-trained radiologist.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed including clinical, radiographic, and pathologic parameters for all patients with breast cancer treated with NAC from 2015 to 2018. Radiographic complete response (rCR) was defined as absence of suspicious MRI findings in the ipsilateral breast or lymph nodes. pCR was defined as the absence of invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in-situ in breast or lymph nodes after operation (ypT0N0M0).

RESULTS

Data for 102 consecutive patients demonstrated that 44 (43.1%) had rCR and 41 (40.1%) had pCR. pCR occurred in 12 (25.0%) of 48 estrogen receptor positive (ER+) patients, 29 (53.7%) of 54 ER- patients, and 25 (52.1%) of 48 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive patients. The positive predictive value for MRI after NAC was 84.5% and the negative predictive value was 72.7%. The accuracy rate for MRI was 78.6%. Of the 44 patients with rCR, 12 (27.3%) had residual cancer on the pathologic specimen after surgical excision.

CONCLUSION

rCR is not accurate enough to serve as a surrogate marker for pCR on MRI after NAC.

Comparison of 99mTc-Sestamibi Molecular Breast Imaging and Breast MRI in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the size of invasive breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) at breast MRI and molecular breast imaging (MBI) and to assess the accuracy of post-NAC MBI and MRI relative to pathologic analysis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Women with invasive breast cancer greater than or equal to 1.5 cm were enrolled to compare the longest dimension before and after NAC at MRI and MBI. MBI was performed on a dual-detector cadmium zinc telluride system after administration of 6.5 mCi (240 MBq) ^99mTc-sestamibi. The accuracy of MRI and MBI in assessing residual disease (invasive disease or ductal carcinoma in situ) was determined relative to pathologic examination. RESULTS. The longest dimension at MRI was within 1.0 cm of that at MBI in 72.3% of cases before NAC and 70.1% of cases after NAC. The difference between the longest dimension at imaging after NAC and pathologic tumor size was within 1 cm for 58.7% of breast MRI cases and 59.6% of MBI cases. Ninety patients underwent both MRI and MBI after NAC. In the 56 patients with invasive residual disease, 10 (17.9%) cases were negative at MRI and 23 (41.1%) cases were negative at MBI. In the 34 patients with breast pathologic complete response, there was enhancement in 10 cases (29.4%) at MRI and uptake in six cases (17.6%) at MBI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value after NAC were 82.8%, 69.4%, 81.4%, and 71.4%, respectively, for MRI and 58.9%, 82.4%, 84.6%, and 54.9%, respectively, for MBI. CONCLUSION. Breast MRI and MBI showed similar disease extent before NAC. MBI may be an alternative to breast MRI in patients with a contraindication to breast MRI. Neither modality showed sufficient accuracy after NAC in predicting breast pathologic complete response to obviate tissue diagnosis to assess for residual invasive disease. Defining the extent of residual disease compared with pathologic evaluation was also limited after NAC for both breast MRI and MBI.

Can unenhanced MRI of the breast replace contrast-enhanced MRI in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND

The goals of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are to reduce tumor volume and to offer a prognostic indicator in assessing treatment response. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) is an established method for evaluating response to NAC in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE

To validate the role of unenhanced MRI (ue-MRI) compared to CE-MRI for assessing response to NAC in women with breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients with ongoing NAC for breast cancer underwent MRI before, during, and at the end of NAC. Ue-MRI was performed with T2-weighted sequences with iterative decomposition of water and fat and diffusion-weighted sequences. CE-MRI was performed using three-dimensional T1-weighted sequences before and after administration of gadobenate dimeglumine. Two blinded observers rated ue-MRI and CE-MRI for the evaluation of tumor response. Statistical analysis was performed to compare lesion size and ADC values changes during therapy, as well as inter-observer agreement.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between ue-MRI and CE-MRI sequences for evaluation of lesion size at baseline and after every cycle of treatment ( P > 0.05). The mean tumor ADC values at baseline and across the cycles of NAC were significantly different for the responder group.

CONCLUSION

Ue-MRI can achieve similar results to CE-MRI for the assessment of tumor response to NAC. ADC values can differentiate responders from non-responders.

Comparison of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, automated breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To compare the accuracy of mammography (MG), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of residual tumor extent in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Fifty-one stage II-III breast cancer undergoing NAC were enrolled from March 2015 to December 2016. The longest diameter of residual tumor measured with MG, DBT, ABUS and MRI was compared with the pathologic tumor size. Statistical analysis was performed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and marginal homogeneity test. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

MRI size correlated well with pathology (ICC = 0.83), significantly better than MG, DBT and ABUS size (ICC = 0.56, ICC = 0.63 and ICC = 0.55, respectively). The discrepancy between MRI and pathology was statistical different from that of MG and ABUS (p = 0.0231 and 0.0039, respectively), but not different from that of DBT (p = 0.5727). For predicting pCR, MRI and DBT had a better performance compared to MG and US (area under the ROC curve: 0.92, 0.84, 0.72, 0.75, respectively; p = 0.3749 for DBT, p = 0.0972 for MG and p = 0.0596 for ABUS, when MRI being reference).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI and DBT allow more accurate assessment of tumor size compared to pathology compared with MG and ABUS. MRI and DBT outperform MG and ABUS in the prediction of pathologic complete response.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Breast Cancer

Patients with locally advanced invasive breast cancers are often treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to definitive surgical intervention. The primary aims of this approach are to: 1) reduce tumor burden thereby permitting breast conservation rather than mastectomy; 2) promptly treat possible metastatic disease, whether or not it is detectable on preoperative staging; and 3) potentially tailor future chemotherapeutic decisions by monitoring in-vivo tumor response. Accurate radiological assessment permits optimal management and planning in this population. However, assessment of tumor size and response to treatment can vary depending on the modality used, the measurement technique (such as single longest diameter, 3-D measurements, or calculated tumor volume), and varied response of different tumor subtypes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (such as concentric shrinkage or tumor fragmentation). As discussed in further detail, digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, US and MRI represent the key modalities with potential to help guide patient management. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histopathological Tumor Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Aim

To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing tumor response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-six patients entered a phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, undergoing bilateral breast magnetic resonance imaging before therapy and before surgery. Tumor response was classified using RECIST criteria, using tumor size at magnetic resonance imaging. The latter was then compared to residue found at histopathological examination.

Results

Magnetic resonance imaging showed 6 (23%) complete responses, 17 (65%) partial responses, 3 (11.5%) disease stabilizations and no disease progressions. Twenty-three tumors (88.5%) were considered responsive and 3 (11.5%) unresponsive. Pathological tumor response was: 6 complete responses (23%), 17 partial responses (65%), 2 stable disease (8%), 1 progression (4%). When results of the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging were compared to pathological tumor response, magnetic resonance imaging overestimated tumor size in 12 cases (46%) and underestimated it in 9 (35%). However, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging failed to detect invasive tumor in 2 false-negative cases (8%), 1 of which was multifocal. Mastectomy was performed in 12 cases: 1 case of disease progression even though the neoplasm appeared smaller at magnetic resonance imaging, 3 cases with stable disease, and 4 cases with T3 or T4 disease. The 9th patient was T2N2 with initial retroareolar disease and negative magnetic resonance imaging after chemotherapy. The 10th patient, affected by lobular cancer, was in partial remission but was T3N1. The 11th patient was 57 years old but was not interested in conservative surgery. The 12th patient requested bilateral prophylactic mastectomy due to her positive family history of breast cancer.

Conclusions

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast allowed conservative surgery in 54% of the patients. This low value is primarily due to overestimation of tumor size, with a negative predictive value of 67% in our population. However, surgeons were able to choose conservative surgery with relative safety in cases of small residual disease.

Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing the Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This pilot study compared contrast enhanced ultrasound (US) with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing the treatment response in patients with breast cancer receiving preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

This prospective Institutional Review Board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study included 30 patients, from January 2014 to October 2015, with invasive breast cancer detected by mammography, conventional US imaging, or both and scheduled for NAC. Informed consent was obtained. Contrast-enhanced US (perflutren lipid microspheres, 10 μL/kg) and MRI (gadopentetate dimeglumine, 0.1 mmol/kg) scans were performed at baseline before starting NAC and after completing NAC before surgery. Results of the imaging techniques were compared with each other and with histopathologic findings obtained at surgery using the Spearman correlation. Tumor size and enhancement parameters were compared for 15 patients with contrast-enhanced US, MRI, and surgical pathologic findings.

RESULTS

The median tumor size at baseline was 3.1 cm on both contrast-enhanced US and MRI scans. The Spearman correlation showed strong agreement in tumor size at baseline between contrast-enhanced US and MRI (r = 0.88; P < .001) but less agreement in tumor size after NAC (r = 0.66; P = .004). Trends suggested that contrast-enhanced US (r = 0.75; P < .001) had a better correlation than MRI (r = 0.42; P = .095) with tumor size at surgery. Contrast-enhanced US was as effective as MRI in predicting a complete pathologic response (4 patients; 75.0% accuracy for both) and a non-complete pathologic response (11 patients; 72.7% accuracy for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast enhanced US is a valuable imaging modality for assessing the treatment response in patients receiving NAC and had a comparable correlation as MRI with breast cancer size at surgery.

The Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in Assessing Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose. We performed this meta-analysis to determine the utilities of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in assessing the pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the same cohort of patients with breast cancer. Methods. Two reviewers systematically searched on PubMed, Scopus, and Springer (from the beginning of 1992 to Aug. 1, 2015) for the eligible articles. Heterogeneity, pooled sensitivity and specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated to estimate the diagnostic efficacy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI. Results. A total of 6 studies including 382 pathologically confirmed patients were eligible. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76–0.93) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.49–0.87), respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45–0.80) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.75–0.95), respectively. The area under the SROC curve of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI was 0.88 and 0.84, respectively. Conclusion. Study indicated that ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had a higher sensitivity and MRI had a higher specificity in assessing pCR in breast cancer patients. Therefore, the combined use of these two imaging modalities may have great potential to improve the diagnostic performance in assessing pCR after NAC.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Functional Tumor Volume by MR Imaging Predicts Recurrence-free Survival-Results from the ACRIN 6657/CALGB 150007 I-SPY 1 TRIAL

PURPOSE

To evaluate volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of breast cancer and to consider its predictive performance relative to pathologic complete response (PCR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant prospective multicenter study was approved by institutional review boards with written informed consent. Women with breast tumors 3 cm or larger scheduled for NACT underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging before treatment (examination 1), after one cycle (examination 2), midtherapy (examination 3), and before surgery (examination 4). Functional tumor volume (FTV), computed from MR images by using enhancement thresholds, and change from baseline (ΔFTV) were measured after one cycle and before surgery. Association of RFS with FTV was assessed by Cox regression and compared with association of RFS with PCR and residual cancer burden (RCB), while controlling for age, race, and hormone receptor (HR)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) status. Predictive performance of models was evaluated by C statistics.

RESULTS

Female patients (n = 162) with FTV and RFS were included. At univariate analysis, FTV2, FTV4, and ΔFTV4 had significant association with RFS, as did HR/HER2 status and RCB class. PCR approached significance at univariate analysis and was not significant at multivariate analysis. At univariate analysis, FTV2 and RCB class had the strongest predictive performance (C statistic = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58, 0.76), greater than for FTV4 (0.64; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.74) and PCR (0.57; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.74). At multivariate analysis, a model with FTV2, ΔFTV2, RCB class, HR/HER2 status, age, and race had the highest C statistic (0.72; 95% CI: 0.60, 0.84).

CONCLUSION

Breast tumor FTV measured by MR imaging is a strong predictor of RFS, even in the presence of PCR and RCB class. Models combining MR imaging, histopathology, and breast cancer subtype demonstrated the strongest predictive performance in this study.

Diagnosis of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by minimal invasive biopsy techniques

Background:

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is widely used as an efficient breast cancer treatment. Ideally, a pathological complete response (pCR) can be achieved. Up to date, there is no reliable way of predicting a pCR. For the first time, we explore the ability of minimal invasive biopsy (MIB) techniques to diagnose pCR in patients with clinical complete response (cCR) to NACT in this study. This question is of high clinical relevance because a reliable pCR prediction could have direct implications for clinical practice.

Methods:

In all, 164 patients were included in this review-board approved, multicenter pooled analysis of prospectively assembled data. Core-cut (CC)-MIB or vacuum-assisted (VAB)-MIB were performed after NACT and before surgery. Negative predictive values (NPV) and false-negative rates (FNR) to predict a pCR in surgical specimen (diagnose pCR through MIB) were the main outcome measures.

Results:

Pathological complete response in surgical specimen was diagnosed in 93 (56.7%) cases of the whole cohort. The NPV of the MIB diagnosis of pCR was 71.3% (95% CI: (63.3% 79.3%)). The FNR was 49.3% (95% CI: (40.4% 58.2%)). Existence of a clip marker tended to improve the NPV (odds ratio 1.98; 95% CI: (0.81; 4.85)). None of the mammographically guided VABs (n=16) was false-negative (FNR 0%, NPV 100%).

Conclusions:

Overall accuracy of MIB diagnosis of pCR was insufficient to suggest changing clinical practice. However, subgroup analyses (mammographically guided VABs) suggest a potential capacity of MIB techniques to precisely diagnose pCR after NACT. Representativity of MIB could be a crucial factor to be focused on in further analyses.

Agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and comparison with alternative tests: individual patient data meta-analysis

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may guide breast cancer surgery by measuring residual tumor size post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Accurate measurement may avoid overly radical surgery or reduce the need for repeat surgery. This individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis examines MRI’s agreement with pathology in measuring the longest tumor diameter and compares MRI with alternative tests.

Methods

A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PREMEDLINE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Heath Technology Assessment, and Cochrane databases identified eligible studies. Primary study authors supplied IPD in a template format constructed a priori. Mean differences (MDs) between tests and pathology (i.e. systematic bias) were calculated and pooled by the inverse variance method; limits of agreement (LOA) were estimated. Test measurements of 0.0 cm in the presence of pathologic residual tumor, and measurements >0.0 cm despite pathologic complete response (pCR) were described for MRI and alternative tests.

Results

Eight studies contributed IPD (N = 300). The pooled MD for MRI was 0.0 cm (LOA: +/−3.8 cm). Ultrasound underestimated pathologic size (MD: −0.3 cm) relative to MRI (MD: 0.1 cm), with comparable LOA. MDs were similar for MRI (0.1 cm) and mammography (0.0 cm), with wider LOA for mammography. Clinical examination underestimated size (MD: −0.8 cm) relative to MRI (MD: 0.0 cm), with wider LOA. Tumors “missed” by MRI typically measured 2.0 cm or less at pathology; tumors >2.0 cm were more commonly “missed” by clinical examination (9.3 %). MRI measurements >5.0 cm occurred in 5.3 % of patients with pCR, but were more frequent for mammography (46.2 %).

Conclusions

There was no systematic bias in MRI tumor measurement, but LOA are large enough to be clinically important. MRI’s performance was generally superior to ultrasound, mammography, and clinical examination, and it may be considered the most appropriate test in this setting. Test combinations should be explored in future studies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1664-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Evaluation with 3.0-T MR imaging: predicting the pathological response of triple-negative breast cancer treated with anthracycline and taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) which expresses neither hormonal receptors nor HER-2 is associated with poor prognosis and shorter survival. Several studies have suggested that TNBC patients attaining pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) show a longer survival than those without pCR.

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of 3.0-T breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting pCR and to evaluate the clinicoradiologic factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-T breast MRI in TNBC patients treated with anthracycline and taxane (ACD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; patient consent was not required. Between 2009 and 2012, 35 TNBC patients with 3.0-T breast MRI prior to (n = 26) or after (n = 35) NAC were included. MRI findings were reviewed according to pCR to chemotherapy. The diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-T breast MRI for predicting pCR and the clinicoradiological factors affecting MRI accuracy and response to NAC were analyzed.

RESULTS

3.0-T MRI following NAC with ACD accurately predicted pCR in 91.4% of TNBC patients. The residual tumor size between pathology and 3.0-T MRI in non-pCR cases showed a higher correlation in the Ki-67-positive TNBC group (r = 0.947) than in the Ki-67 negative group (r = 0.375) with statistical trends (P = 0.069). Pre-treatment MRI in the non-pCR group compared to the pCR group showed a larger tumor size (P = 0.030) and non-mass presentation (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

3.0-T MRI in TNBC patients following NAC with ACD showed a high accuracy for predicting pCR to NAC. Ki-67 can affect the diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-T MRI for pCR to NAC with ACD in TNBC patients.

Effective factors to raise diagnostic performance of breast MRI for diagnosing pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Although MRI is a highly effective tool in evaluating residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), there are many reports of discordance between the response of MRI and pathology. To increase MR accuracy, additional methods, which reflect post-NAC changes, should be considered in diagnosis.

PURPOSE

To evaluate effective methods that raise the diagnostic performance of MRI for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 98 invasive breast carcinoma patients, chemotherapeutic response to MRI was evaluated for the following parameters: tumor size, tumor distribution pattern, kinetic curve analysis, and background parenchymal enhancement pattern (BPE). BPE was categorized as "minimal", "mild", "moderate", or "marked", according to the ACR BI-RADS criteria.

RESULTS

After NAC, the mean size of tumors decreased by 40% in non-pCR and by 59% in pCR groups, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate and false negative rate of MRI were 96% (78/81), 53% (9/17), 47% (8/17), and 4% (3/81), respectively. At pre-NAC MRI, the most common kinetic curve was delayed washout pattern (68%, 67/98); however, at post-NAC MRI the persistent pattern (55%, 47/86). Grouped lesion was the most common tumor distribution pattern on pre-NAC MRI (28%, 27/98), while on post-NAC solitary mass (40%, 34/86). The most common BPE at pre- and post-NAC MRI was mild and minimal enhancement, respectively.

CONCLUSION

To improve the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, we should consider additional factors including: tumor distribution pattern, BPE, kinetic curve analysis, and tumor size.

A Canadian national expert consensus on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: linking practice to evidence and beyond

BACKGROUND

Use of the neoadjuvant approach to treat breast cancer patients has increased since the early 2000s, but the overall pathway of care for such patients can be highly variable. The aim of our project was to establish a multidisciplinary consensus among clinicians with expertise in neoadjuvant therapy (nat) for breast cancer and to determine if that consensus reflects published methods used in randomized controlled trials (rcts) in this area.

METHODS

A modified Delphi protocol, which used iterative surveys administered to 85 experts across Canada, was established to obtain expert consensus concerning all aspects of the care pathway for patients undergoing nat for breast cancer. All rcts published between January 1, 1967, and December 1, 2012, were systematically reviewed. Data extracted from the rcts were analyzed to determine if the methods used matched the expert consensus for specific areas of nat management. A scoring system determined the strength of the agreement between the literature and the expert consensus.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for all areas of the pathway of care for patients undergoing nat for breast cancer, with the exception of the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-treatment or preoperative setting. The levels of agreement between the consensus statements and the published rcts varied, primarily because specific aspects of the pathway of care were not well described in the reviewed literature.

CONCLUSIONS

A true consensus of expert opinion concerning the pathway of care appropriate for patients receiving nat for breast cancer has been achieved. A review of the literature illuminated gaps in the evidence about some elements of nat management. Where evidence is available, agreement with expert opinion is strong overall. Our study is unique in its approach to establishing consensus among medical experts in this field and has established a pathway of care that can be applied in practice for patients receiving nat.

Breast magnetic resonance imaging indications

The use of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has grown for the past decade and, along with the increase in use, there has been a progression in the indications for use. Breast MRI has been shown to be a valuable additional tool for breast imagers to use to provide optimal patient care. Because of the benefit that MRI can provide, the technology is now being used for a wide variety of indications, from evaluation of the extent of disease to evaluation of the high-risk patient, evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy, and search for occult primary tumor. This review will cover the various indications for breast MRI, discuss research to date, as well as provide case examples.

Accuracy of MRI for treatment response assessment after taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that MRI is an accurate means for assessing tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, accuracy might be dependent on the receptor status of tumors. MRI accuracy for response assessment after homogenous NAC in a relative large group of patients with stage II/III HER2-negative breast cancer has not been reported before.

METHODS

250 patients from 26 hospitals received NAC (docetaxel, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide) in the context of the NEOZOTAC trial. MRI was done after 3 cycles and post-NAC. Imaging (RECIST 1.1) and pathological (Miller and Payne) responses were recorded. Accuracy measures were calculated and MRI and pathologically assessed tumor sizes were correlated. Tumor size over- and underestimation were quantified.

RESULTS

Accuracy of MRI for determining pathological complete response (pCR) was 76%. The ROC-curve of MRI response and pCR had an area under the curve value of 0.63 (95% C.I. 0.52-0.74). The correlation coefficient of MRI and histopathological tumor measurements was 0.46 (p < 0.001). Correlations were different for ER-positive (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) and ER-negative (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) breast tumors. MRI under- and overestimated the tumor size in 47% and 40% of all patients. In cases of substantial tumor size underestimation (>2 cm), surgical margins were more often tumor positive compared to the rest of the patients (33% vs.12%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

MRI measurements correlated moderately with tumor size on the surgical specimen. Only in ER-negative breast tumors, MRI tumor sizes correlated sufficiently with residual tumor size on the pathological specimen. Therefore, post-NAC MRI should be interpreted with caution.

Changes in primary breast cancer heterogeneity may augment midtreatment MR imaging assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether changes in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging heterogeneity may aid assessment for pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in primary breast cancer and to compare pCR with standard Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval, with waiver of informed consent, was obtained for this retrospective analysis of 36 consecutive female patients, with unilateral unifocal primary breast cancer larger than 2 cm in diameter who were receiving sequential anthracycline-taxane NACT between October 2008 and October 2012. T2- and T1-weighted dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging was performed before, at midtreatment (after three cycles), and after NACT. Changes in tumor entropy (irregularity) and uniformity (gray-level distribution) were determined before and after MR image filtration (for different-sized features). Entropy and uniformity for pathologic complete responders and nonresponders were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

With NACT, there was an increase in uniformity and a decrease in entropy on T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced subtracted T1-weighted MR images for all filters (uniformity: 23.45% and 22.62%; entropy: -19.15% and -19.26%, respectively). There were eight complete pathologic responders. An area under the curve of 0.84 for T2-weighted MR imaging entropy and uniformity (P = .004 and .003) and 0.66 for size (P = .183) for pCR was found, giving a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 82.1% for entropy and 87.5% and 78.6% for uniformity compared with 50% and 82.1%, respectively, for tumor size change for association with pCR.

CONCLUSION

Tumors become more homogeneous with treatment. An increase in T2-weighted MR imaging uniformity and a decrease in T2-weighted MR imaging entropy following NACT may provide an earlier indication of pCR than tumor size change.

Effect of breast cancer phenotype on diagnostic performance of MRI in the prediction to response to neoadjuvant treatment

AIM

The estimation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is useful in the surgical decision in breast cancer. We addressed the diagnostic reliability of conventional MRI, of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and of a merged criterion coupling morphological MRI and DWI. Diagnostic performance was analysed separately in different tumor subtypes, including HER2+ (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)/HR+ (hormone receptor) (hybrid phenotype).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two-hundred and twenty-five patients underwent MRI before and after NAC. The response to treatment was defined according to the RECIST classification and the evaluation of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The complete pathological response - pCR was assessed (Mandard classification).

RESULTS

Tumor phenotypes were Luminal (63.6%), Triple Negative (16.4%), HER2+ (7.6%) or Hybrid (12.4%). After NAC, pCR was observed in 17.3% of cases. Average ADC was statistically higher after NAC (p<0.001) among patients showing pCR vs. those who had not pCR. The RECIST classification showed adequate performance in predicting the pCR in Triple Negative (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC AUC=0.9) and in the HER2+ subgroup (AUC=0.826). Lower performance was found in the Luminal and Hybrid subgroups (AUC 0.693 and 0.611, respectively), where the ADC criterion yielded an improved performance (AUC=0.787 and 0.722). The coupling of morphological and DWI criteria yielded maximally improved performance in the Luminal and Hybrid subgroups (AUC=0.797 and 0.761).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic reliability of MRI in predicting the pCR to NAC depends on the tumor phenotype, particularly in the Luminal and Hybrid subgroups. In these cases, the coupling of morphological MRI evaluation and DWI assessment may facilitate the diagnosis.

Impact of factors affecting the residual tumor size diagnosed by MRI following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in comparison to pathology

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measuring residual tumor size in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients were studied. Several MRI were performed during NAC for response monitoring, and the residual tumor size was measured on last MRI after completing NAC. Covariates, including age, tumor characteristics, biomarkers, NAC regimens, MRI scanners, and time from last MRI to operation, were analyzed. Univariate and Multivariate linear regression models were used to determine the predictive value of these covariates for MRI-pathology size discrepancy as the outcome measure.

RESULTS

The mean (±SD) of the absolute difference between MRI and pathological residual tumor size was 1.0 ± 2.0 cm (range, 0-14 cm). Univariate regression analysis showed tumor type, morphology, HR status, HER2 status, and MRI scanner (1.5 T or 3.0 T) were significantly associated with MRI-pathology size discrepancy (all P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analyses demonstrated that only tumor type, tumor morphology, and biomarker status considering both HR and HER-2 were independent predictors (P = 0.0014, 0.0032, and 0.0286, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of MRI in evaluating residual tumor size depends on tumor type, morphology, and biomarker status. The information may be considered in surgical planning for NAC patients.