1
|
Baltussen JC, de Glas NA, Liefers GJ, Slingerland M, Speetjens FM, van den Bos F, Cloos-van Balen M, Verschoor AJ, Jochems A, Spierings LEAMM, Holterhues C, van Gerven LA, Mooijaart SP, Portielje JEA, Derks MGM. Time trends in treatment patterns and survival of older patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer in the Netherlands: A population-based study. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:2043-2051. [PMID: 36620951 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
New treatment strategies have improved survival of metastatic colorectal cancer in trials. However, it is not clear whether older patients benefit from these novel therapies, as they are often not included in pivotal trials. Therefore, we investigated treatment patterns and overall survival over time in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in a population-based study. We identified 22.192 Dutch patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2020 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Changes in treatment over time were assessed with logistic regression models. Survival was assessed by Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR). Results showed that chemotherapy use increased between 2005 and 2015, but declined from 2015 onwards, while more patients received best supportive care. Over time, fewer patients underwent primary tumor resection alone. Although survival of both metastatic colon and rectal cancer improved until 2014, survival of colon cancer decreased from 2014 onwards (HR 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), which was seen in all age groups. Survival of metastatic rectal cancer patients remained unchanged from 2014 onwards (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.03) in all age groups. In conclusion, treatment patterns of Dutch older patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer rapidly changed from 2005 to 2020, with increasing percentages of patients receiving best supportive care. Survival of metastatic colon cancer decreased from 2014 onwards. The implementation of a colorectal cancer screening program and patient selection might explain why only a subset of older patients seem to benefit from the availability of novel treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joosje C Baltussen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke A de Glas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit-Jan Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank M Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arjan J Verschoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk Jochems
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cynthia Holterhues
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Leander A van Gerven
- Department of Internal Medicine, LangeLand Hospital, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marloes G M Derks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pilleron S, Charvat H, Araghi M, Arnold M, Fidler-Benaoudia MM, Bardot A, Grønlie Guren M, Tervonen H, Little A, O'Connell DL, Gavin A, De P, Aagard Thomsen L, Møller B, Jackson C, Bucher O, Walsh PM, Vernon S, Bray F, Soerjomataram I. Age disparities in stage-specific colon cancer survival across seven countries: An International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership SURVMARK-2 population-based study. Int J Cancer 2021; 148:1575-1585. [PMID: 33006395 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
We sought to understand the role of stage at diagnosis in observed age disparities in colon cancer survival among people aged 50 to 99 years using population-based cancer registry data from seven high-income countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom. We used colon cancer incidence data for the period 2010 to 2014. We estimated the 3-year net survival, as well as the 3-year net survival conditional on surviving at least 6 months and 1 year after diagnosis, by country and stage at diagnosis (categorised as localised, regional or distant) using flexible parametric excess hazard regression models. In all countries, increasing age was associated with lower net survival. For example, 3-year net survival (95% confidence interval) was 81% (80-82) for 50 to 64 year olds and 58% (56-60) for 85 to 99 year olds in Australia, and 74% (73-74) and 39% (39-40) in the United Kingdom, respectively. Those with distant stage colon cancer had the largest difference in colon cancer survival between the youngest and the oldest patients. Excess mortality for the oldest patients with localised or regional cancers was observed during the first 6 months after diagnosis. Older patients diagnosed with localised (and in some countries regional) stage colon cancer who survived 6 months after diagnosis experienced the same survival as their younger counterparts. Further studies examining other prognostic clinical factors such as comorbidities and treatment, and socioeconomic factors are warranted to gain further understanding of the age disparities in colon cancer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Pilleron
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Hadrien Charvat
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Marzieh Araghi
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Melina Arnold
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Aude Bardot
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- Department of Oncology and K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanna Tervonen
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alana Little
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Prithwish De
- Surveillance and Cancer Registry, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Bjørn Møller
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Department of Registration, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Oliver Bucher
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | | | - Freddie Bray
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Isabelle Soerjomataram
- Section of Cancer Surveillance, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pilleron S, Gower H, Janssen-Heijnen M, Signal VC, Gurney JK, Morris EJ, Cunningham R, Sarfati D. Patterns of age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival: a systematic narrative literature review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044239. [PMID: 33692182 PMCID: PMC7949400 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify patterns of age disparities in cancer survival, using colon and lung cancer as exemplars. DESIGN Systematic review of the literature. DATA SOURCES We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science through 18 December 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We retained all original articles published in English including patients with colon or lung cancer. Eligible studies were required to be population-based, report survival across several age groups (of which at least one was over the age of 65) and at least one other characteristic (eg, sex, treatment). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies against selected evaluation domains from the QUIPS tool, and items concerning statistical reporting. We evaluated age disparities using the absolute difference in survival or mortality rates between the middle-aged group and the oldest age group, or by describing survival curves. RESULTS Out of 3047 references, we retained 59 studies (20 for colon, 34 for lung and 5 for both sites). Regardless of the cancer site, the included studies were highly heterogeneous and often of poor quality. The magnitude of age disparities in survival varied greatly by sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, stage at diagnosis, cancer site, and morphology, the number of nodes examined and treatment strategy. Although results were inconsistent for most characteristics, we consistently observed greater age disparities for women with lung cancer compared with men. Also, age disparities increased with more advanced stages for colon cancer and decreased with more advanced stages for lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS Although age is one of the most important prognostic factors in cancer survival, age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival have so far been understudied in population-based research. Further studies are needed to better understand age disparities in colon and lung cancer survival. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020151402.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Pilleron
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Helen Gower
- Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia, Surgical Cancer Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Maryska Janssen-Heijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Virginia Claire Signal
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jason K Gurney
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Eva Ja Morris
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Big Data Institute, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth Cunningham
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Diana Sarfati
- New Zealand Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sakamoto Y, Miyamoto Y, Tokunaga R, Akiyama T, Daitoku N, Hiyoshi Y, Iwatsuki M, Baba Y, Iwagami S, Yoshida N, Baba H. Long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery for elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Today 2019; 50:597-603. [PMID: 31844988 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01934-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effect of old age on the perioperative, short-term, and long-term surgical outcomes of elderly patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS The subjects of this retrospective study were 526 patients who underwent curative resections for stage I-III CRC between March 2005 and March 2016. We divided the patients into a young group (< 75 years old, n = 361) and an elderly group (≥ 75 years old, n = 165) and compared the clinicopathological factors and prognoses of the two groups. We performed a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to avoid confounding bias. RESULTS The elderly group had more right-sided tumors and more comorbidities than the young group. After PSM, there were 148 patients in each group. Although the elderly group had significantly shorter overall survival than the young group, the two groups did not differ significantly in cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = 0.136) or recurrence rate (RR; P = 0.317). Multivariate analysis with IPTW also revealed no significant difference in CSS (P = 0.171) or RR (P = 0.284) between the young and elderly groups. Our findings were limited by the study's retrospective single-institute conditions, and the inclusion of only patients who underwent radical resections. CONCLUSION Primary tumor resection is appropriate for elderly patients with CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Yuji Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Ryuma Tokunaga
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Takahiko Akiyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Nobuya Daitoku
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Yukiharu Hiyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Masaaki Iwatsuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Shiro Iwagami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Naoya Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feng Y, Mo S, Dai W, Li Q, Cai G, Cai S. Increasing age-related survival gap among patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 25:100-109. [PMID: 31531787 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01538-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) has improved over the past decades. However, it is unclear whether older patients have benefited to the same extent as younger patients. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 9 registries database was queried for CRC patients from 1975 to 2009. We presented yearly data for survival with overlying loess-smoothing lines across all age groups. Another cohort was created using the SEER 18 registries database for patients diagnosed with CRC from 1973 to 2014. Yearly data for surgery-performed rate, stage proportion, and multivariate hazard ratio were performed with overlying smoothing lines across all age groups. RESULTS In the analysis SEER 9, 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) of patients aged ≤ 54, 55-64, and 65-74 years showed robust increase since 1975; however, the survival of patients aged 75-84 years remained low despite modest improvement, and patients aged 85 or older even showed no survival gains since 1990. In the analysis of SEER 18, there has been a steady increase in the survival of patients aged ≤ 54, 55-64, 65-74, and 75-84 years as time period advanced; however, of CRC patients aged ≥ 85 years, the survival curves of period 1990-1999 and 2000-2012 could not be distinguished from each other presented with negligibly a small gap from the curve of 1980-1989. CONCLUSIONS The strong interaction between age and year of diagnosis implies that older patients have benefited less over time than younger patients, especially for patients aged ≥ 85 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Feng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Shaobo Mo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Weixing Dai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qingguo Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Guoxiang Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Sanjun Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abbema DV, Vissers P, Vos-Geelen JD, Lemmens V, Janssen-Heijnen M, Tjan-Heijnen V. Trends in Overall Survival and Treatment Patterns in Two Large Population-Based Cohorts of Patients with Breast and Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11091239. [PMID: 31450842 PMCID: PMC6769766 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies showed substantial improvement of survival rates in patients with cancer in the last two decades. However, lower survival rates have been reported for older patients compared to younger patients. In this population-based study, we analyzed treatment patterns and the survival of patients with breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients with stages I–III BC and CRC and diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Trends in treatment modalities were evaluated with the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Trends in five-year overall survival were calculated with the Cox hazard regression model. The Ederer II method was used to calculate the five-year relative survival. The relative excess risk of death (RER) was estimated using a multivariate generalized linear model. During the study period, 98% of BC patients aged <75 years underwent surgery, whereas for patients ≥75 years, rates were 79.3% in 2003 and 66.7% in 2012 (p < 0.001). Most CRC patients underwent surgery irrespective of age or time period, although patients with rectal cancer aged ≥75 years received less surgery or radiotherapy over the entire study period than younger patients. The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy increased over time for CRC and BC patients, except for BC patients aged ≥75 years. The five-year relative survival improved only in younger BC patients (adjusted RER 0.95–0.96 per year), and was lower for older BC patients (adjusted RER 1.00, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.98–1.02, and RER 1.00; 95% CI 0.98–1.01 per year for 65–74 years and ≥75 years, respectively). For CRC patients, the five-year relative survival improved over time for all ages (adjusted RER on average was 0.95 per year). In conclusion, the observed survival trends in BC and CRC patients suggest advances in cancer treatment, but with striking differences in survival between older and younger patients, particularly for BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris van Abbema
- Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Tafelbergweg 51, 1105 BD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline Vissers
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Valery Lemmens
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maryska Janssen-Heijnen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL Venlo, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weerink LBM, Gant CM, van Leeuwen BL, de Bock GH, Kouwenhoven EA, Faneyte IF. Long-Term Survival in Octogenarians After Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer: Prevention of Postoperative Complications is Key. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3874-3882. [PMID: 30244418 PMCID: PMC6245105 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6766-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Whether to treat octogenarians with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the same manner as younger patients remains a challenging issue. The purpose of this study was to analyse postoperative complications and long-term survival in a consecutive cohort of octogenarians who were surgically treated for CRC. Methods Octogenarians with primary CRC suitable for curative surgery between January 2008 and December 2011 were included. Data about comorbidities, tumour stage, and complications were retrospectively collected from patient files. Data about survival were retrieved with use of the Dutch database for persons and addresses. To identify factors associated with severe postoperative complications and postoperative survival, logistic regression analyses, and Cox regression analyses were performed. Odds ratios and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results In a series of 108 octogenarians, median age was 83 years (range 80–94 years). Median follow-up was 47 (range 1–107) months. Major postoperative complications occurred in 25% of the patients. No risk factors for development of severe postoperative complications could be identified. The 30-day mortality was 7%; 1- and 5-year mortality was 19% and 56%, respectively. Overall median survival was 48 months: 66 months in patients without complications versus 13 months in patients with postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were most predictive of decreased survival (HR 3.16; 95% CI 1.79–5.59), even including tumour characteristics, comorbidity, and emergency surgery. Conclusions Long-term survival in octogenarians deemed fit for surgery is reasonably good. Prevention of major postoperative complications could further improve clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda B M Weerink
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Department Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands.
| | - Christina M Gant
- Department Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara L van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ian F Faneyte
- Department Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Raycraft T, Cheung WY, Yin Y, Speers C, Ko JJ, Mariano C. Causes of mortality in older patients with stage 3 colon cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 10:138-142. [PMID: 29960748 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Life expectancy plays a key role in the selection of patients with stage III colon cancer for adjuvant chemotherapy, but little is known about causes of mortality in older patients with colon cancer. We aimed to examine causes of death in this population and compare these causes between patients who received chemotherapy and those who did not. Specifically, we chose to examine the rates of death related to recurrent colon cancer versus non colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients aged 50 and older diagnosed with stage III colon cancer between 2005 and 2009 were included. Patients were divided into "younger" (aged 50-69) and "older" (aged 70+). Causes of death, which were categorized into colon cancer versus non-colon cancer related. RESULTS 1361 patients were included, 50% of whom were 70 or older. Younger patients were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (90% vs. 60%). 601 patients died in the follow up period. Deceased patients in the younger group were more likely to die from colon cancer (81% vs. 62%). The most common cause of non-colon cancer death was other primary malignancies in younger patients and cardiovascular diseases in older patients. In older patients who received chemotherapy, 41% died; 89% of these deaths were related to colon cancer. In older patients who did not receive chemotherapy 72% died, with 38% of patients ultimately dying from colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS Older patients remain under-treated with chemotherapy. Although non-colon cancer deaths were more frequent in older patients with cancer, colon cancer was a still a significant cause of mortality. These deaths may be preventable with adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Raycraft
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- University of Calgary, Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Canada
| | - Yaling Yin
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Caroline Speers
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jenny J Ko
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Caroline Mariano
- University of British Columbia, Royal Columbian Hospital, Department of Medicine, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van den Broek CBM, Puylaert CCEM, Breugom AJ, Bastiaannet E, de Craen AJM, van de Velde CJH, Liefers GJ, Portielje JEA. Administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with Stage III colon cancer: an observational study. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:O358-O364. [PMID: 28873267 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM According to established guidelines, patients with Stage III colon cancer should receive adjuvant chemotherapy. However, a significant proportion do not. This study assessed factors associated with the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and causes of death. METHODS Patients with Stage III colon cancer who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2009 were selected from two hospitals in the Netherlands. Patient characteristics including comorbidities and treatment preferences, tumour characteristics and follow-up were extracted from the medical records. The patient and tumour characteristics of patients who did receive chemotherapy were compared with those who did not using chi-squared analysis. Differences between the groups in causes of death were recorded together with the duration of follow-up. RESULTS A total of 348 patients were included. The median age was 73 years (range 33-93). Over half of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (50.6%). Patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly older (P < 0.001), had more comorbidities (P < 0.001) and were more often living alone (P < 0.001). Patients who received no adjuvant chemotherapy had a reduced overall survival, and the cause of death was more often attributed to other causes (60%) than colon cancer (40%). For patients who received chemotherapy, the cause of death was usually attributed to colon cancer (71%). CONCLUSION Patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had a worse overall survival and the majority died due to other causes than colon cancer. In our aging society it will become even more important to develop tools to estimate remaining life expectancy in order to improve the selection of older patients for adjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C B M van den Broek
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C C E M Puylaert
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A J Breugom
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Bastiaannet
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A J M de Craen
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G-J Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J E A Portielje
- Department of Clinical Oncology, HAGA Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kuipers EJ, Grady WM, Lieberman D, Seufferlein T, Sung JJ, Boelens PG, van de Velde CJH, Watanabe T. Colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2015; 1:15065. [PMID: 27189416 PMCID: PMC4874655 DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 984] [Impact Index Per Article: 109.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer had a low incidence several decades ago. However, it has become a predominant cancer and now accounts for approximately 10% of cancer-related mortality in western countries. The 'rise' of colorectal cancer in developed countries can be attributed to the increasingly ageing population, unfavourable modern dietary habits and an increase in risk factors, such as smoking, low physical exercise and obesity. New treatments for primary and metastatic colorectal cancer have emerged, providing additional options for patients; these treatments include laparoscopic surgery for primary disease, more-aggressive resection of metastatic disease (such as liver and pulmonary metastases), radiotherapy for rectal cancer, and neoadjuvant and palliative chemotherapies. However, these new treatment options have had limited impact on cure rates and long-term survival. For these reasons, and the recognition that colorectal cancer is long preceded by a polypoid precursor, screening programmes have gained momentum. This Primer provides an overview of the current state of the art of knowledge on the epidemiology and mechanisms of colorectal cancer, as well as on diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernst J. Kuipers
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center, s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William M. Grady
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Lieberman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Joseph J. Sung
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Petra G. Boelens
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Toshiaki Watanabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Vascular Surgery, University of Tokyo, and the University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ko JJ, Kennecke HF, Lim HJ, Renouf DJ, Gill S, Woods R, Speers C, Cheung WY. Reasons for Underuse of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2015; 15:179-85. [PMID: 26520019 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Undertreatment has been frequently reported in the elderly cancer patient population. For this reason, we aimed to characterize adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) use among elderly patients (EPs) with stage III colon cancer (CC) and to identify potential reasons for undertreatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with stage III CC between 2008 and 2010 were included in this review. Multivariate Cox regression models were constructed to evaluate the associations between AC and cancer-specific, disease-free, and overall survival and to determine whether these were modified by age. RESULTS We identified 810 patients: 423 (52%) men, 423 (52%) young patients (YPs), and 603 (74%) received AC. Compared with YPs, EPs were less likely to receive AC (57% vs. 91%; P < .01), particularly 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (32% vs. 74%, P < .01). Frequent reasons for nontreatment included age, comorbidities, and perceived minimal benefit from AC. When AC was given, EPs had similar rates of treatment discontinuations (34% vs. 26%; P > .05) and dose reductions (63% vs. 61%; P > .05) as YPs. Reasons for treatment interruptions included side effects, progressive disease, and patient choice. Receipt of either FOLFOX or capecitabine was correlated with improved cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival compared with surgery alone; this effect was not modified by age. CONCLUSION Elderly patients with stage III CC frequently received either no AC or capecitabine monotherapy because of advanced age and comorbidities. The effect of AC on survival was similar across age groups, with comparable side effects and rates of treatment modifications. AC should not be withheld because of advanced age alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny J Ko
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hagen F Kennecke
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Howard J Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Daniel J Renouf
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sharlene Gill
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ryan Woods
- Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Caroline Speers
- Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Relative impact of earlier diagnosis and improved treatment on survival for colorectal cancer: A US database study among elderly patients. Cancer Epidemiol 2014; 38:733-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2014] [Revised: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/12/2014] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
13
|
Hamaker ME, Schiphorst AH, Verweij NM, Pronk A. Improved survival for older patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2011. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29:1231-6. [PMID: 25024043 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-1959-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older colorectal cancer patients have a higher risk of postoperative complications, and the impact of adverse events on survival is also significantly higher. Innovations like laparoscopic surgery which improve short-term outcome for older patients can also benefit their overall prognosis. We set out to analyse the impact of an increased utilisation of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the Netherlands on overall survival. METHODS All patients diagnosed with stages I-III colorectal cancer in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2011 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Changes in perioperative mortality, 3-month mortality and 1-year mortality rates were analysed using year of diagnosis as an instrumental variable. RESULTS Over 33,000 patients were included in the analyses. Data on surgical approach were not precisely known for 2008 and 2009; in 2010, 36.6 % of definitive surgical procedures were performed laparoscopically and 45.9 % in 2011. A laparoscopic approach was used less frequently in the patients aged ≥75 years (in 2011, 40.3 versus 49.2 % of younger patients; p < 0.001). Between 2008 and 2011, perioperative mortality decreased from 2.0 to 1.5 % (p = 0.02), 3-month mortality from 4.8 to 3.9 % (p = 0.01) and 1-year mortality from 9.6 to 8.3 % (p < 0.001). The absolute risk reduction was greatest for patients aged ≥75 years, reaching 2.1 % for 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION Between 2008 and 2011, the utilisation of a laparoscopic approach increases significantly, resulting in reduced mortality rates, particularly for the elderly. Therefore, a laparoscopic approach should be used whenever possible, which may allow for further improvement of outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Professor Lorentzlaan 76, Zeist, Utrecht, 3707 HL, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Papamichael D, Audisio RA, Glimelius B, de Gramont A, Glynne-Jones R, Haller D, Köhne CH, Rostoft S, Lemmens V, Mitry E, Rutten H, Sargent D, Sastre J, Seymour M, Starling N, Van Cutsem E, Aapro M. Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) consensus recommendations 2013. Ann Oncol 2014; 26:463-76. [PMID: 25015334 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 275] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in Europe and worldwide, with the peak incidence in patients >70 years of age. However, as the treatment algorithms for the treatment of patients with CRC become ever more complex, it is clear that a significant percentage of older CRC patients (>70 years) are being less than optimally treated. This document provides a summary of an International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) task force meeting convened in Paris in 2013 to update the existing expert recommendations for the treatment of older (geriatric) CRC patients published in 2009 and includes overviews of the recent data on epidemiology, geriatric assessment as it relates to surgery and oncology, and the ability of older CRC patients to tolerate surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, treatment of their metastatic disease including palliative chemotherapy with and without the use of the biologics, and finally the use of adjuvant and palliative radiotherapy in the treatment of older rectal cancer patients. An overview of each area was presented by one of the task force experts and comments invited from other task force members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Papamichael
- Department of Medical Oncology, B.O. Cyprus Oncology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | - B Glimelius
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Science, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | - D Haller
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - C-H Köhne
- Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - S Rostoft
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - V Lemmens
- Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (IKZ), Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - E Mitry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Guyancourt, France
| | - H Rutten
- Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - J Sastre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Seymour
- Cancer Medicine and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds
| | - N Starling
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Aapro
- SIOG Office, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) largely affects older individuals; almost half of cases occur in patients >75 years old. The incidence increases with advancing age, doubling every 7 years in patients aged ≥50 years. The medical and societal burdens of CRC will probably worsen over the coming decades as the number of older individuals (>70) continues to grow. No evidence-based guidelines are available for this age group, as older patients with CRC are generally excluded from randomized clinical trials and the fit ones who are recruited are not representative of the general elderly population. When feasible, surgery is the most successful treatment option for eradicating the primary lesion, as well as any metastases. The operative risk under elective conditions is not markedly different in older than in younger patients; however, the acute setting is to be avoided as it is associated with high operative death rates. Well-selected older patients can tolerate chemotherapy, but benefits need to be balanced against potentially limited life expectancy and reduced quality of life. The use of combination chemotherapy is an area of much controversy, but this treatment should not necessarily be withheld because of the age of the patient. Careful monitoring of toxicities and early intervention is essential in older patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo A Audisio
- University of Liverpool, St Helens Teaching Hospital, Department of Surgery, Marshalls Cross Road, St Helens, Liverpool WA9 3DA, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Reimers MS, Bastiaannet E, van Herk-Sukel MPP, Lemmens VEP, van den Broek CBM, van de Velde CJH, de Craen AJM, Liefers GJ. Aspirin use after diagnosis improves survival in older adults with colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60:2232-6. [PMID: 23176157 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess survival in relation to aspirin use after diagnosis in older adults with colon cancer. DESIGN Subgroup analysis of a previously published cohort and retrospective study. SETTING Individuals registered in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (ECR) between 1998 and 2007, linked to prescriptions of low-dose aspirin (80 mg) registered in a community pharmacy database. PARTICIPANTS Five hundred thirty-six individuals aged 70 and older diagnosed with colon cancer with or without aspirin use after diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS Survival was analyzed with user status as a time-dependent covariate. Multivariate Poisson regression survival models were used to study the effect of aspirin on overall survival. RESULTS One hundred seven participants (20.0%) started aspirin after being diagnosed with colon cancer; 429 (80.0%) were not prescribed aspirin. Three hundred thirty-nine participants (63.2%) had died by the end of follow-up. Aspirin use after diagnosis was associated with longer overall survival (rate ratio (RR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.38-0.70, P < .001). Multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that aspirin use was associated with longer overall survival (adjusted RR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.44-0.81, P = .001). CONCLUSION Aspirin use after the diagnosis of colon cancer in older adults was associated with longer survival. Low-dose aspirin could be used as an effective adjuvant therapy in older adults with colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlies S Reimers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Le PAIR-gynécologie : recherche multi/interdisciplinaire en cancérologie gynécologique. Les problèmes à résoudre en 2012. Bull Cancer 2012; 99:479-98. [DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2012.1558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|