Comparison of optimal cytoreduction rates in emergency versus non-emergency admissions for advanced ovarian cancer: A multi-institutional study

[Surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer: Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]

Debulking surgery is the key step of advanced stage ovarian cancer treatment with chemotherapy. The quality of surgical resection is the main prognosis factor, thus a complete resection must be achieved (grade A) in an expert center (grade B). Surgery for stage IV is possible and has a benefit in case of complete peritoneal resection (LoE3). Pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomies are recommended in case of clinical or radiological suspicious lymph nodes (grade B). In absence of clinical or radiological suspicious lymph nodes and in case of complete peritoneal resection during initial debulking surgery, lymphadenectomy can be omitted because it won't change nor medical treatment nor overall survival (grade B). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be proposed in case of: impossibility to perform initial complete surgical resection (grade B) ; alteration of general state or co-morbidities or elderly patient (in order to decrease morbidity and increase quality of life) (grade B); stage IV with multiple intra-hepatic or pulmonary metastasis or important ascites with miliary (grade B). In case of stage III or IV ovarian cancer diagnosed on a biopsy during prior laparotomy, a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery should be preferred (gradeC). In case of palliative surgery or peroperative impossibility to perform a complete resection, no data regarding the type of surgery to perform influencing survival or quality of life is available. Peritoneal carcinosis description before resection and residual disease at the end of the surgery should be reported (size, location and reason of non-extirpability) (grade B). A score of peritoneal carcinosis such as Peritoneal Carcinosis Index (PCI) should be used in order to objectively evaluate the tumoral burden (gradeC). A standardized operative report is recommended (gradeC).

Clinical outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical outcome in patients selected to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared to primary debulking surgery (PDS).

METHODS

Retrospective study including all consecutive patients diagnosed and treated for advanced (stages III-IV) ovarian cancers between the years 2003-2015.

RESULTS

263 women were included in the study, of these, 127 patients were selected to receive NACT and 136 were treated with PDS followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. PDS was associated with longer OS in stage IIIc disease (median OS: 60.2 vs. 48.8months; p-value 0.039) compared with NACT. Patients achieved higher rates of complete cytoreduction in the NACT group compared to the PDS group (65.9% vs. 40.2%; p=0.001). Patients attaining complete cytoreduction after PDS had the best survival, (median OS 106months) followed by those with complete cytoreduction after NACT (median OS 71months), followed by those with residual disease after PDS (median OS 55months). Patients with residual disease following interval debulking after NACT had the worst outcome (median OS 36months). Platinum sensitivity following first line and second line chemotherapy was similar whether patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not.

CONCLUSION

PDS was associated with improved outcome. NACT appears to improve survival outcome in patients that would have had residual disease after PDS, and attain complete cytoreduction at the time of interval cytoreduction. This treatment option can be used in selected patients that are not candidates for complete cytoreduction at PDS.

Mortality in emergency surgical oncology

PURPOSE

Cancer patients can experience problems related to their disease or treatment. This study evaluated reasons for presentation at the emergency room (ER) and outcome of surgical oncology patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review for all surgical oncology patients who presented at the ER of the UMCG for surgical consultation between October 1, 2012, and March 31, 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 200 cancer patients visited the ER for surgical consultation: 53.5 % with complications of (previous) cancer treatment, 25.5 % with symptoms caused by malignant disease, and 21.0 % with symptoms not related to cancer or cancer treatment. The 30-day mortality rate for patients with progressive disease was 25.5 %, and overall mortality rate was 62.8 %. The most frequent reason for ER presentation was intestinal obstruction (26.5 %), of which 41.5 % was malignant. Most cancer patients (59.5 %) did not undergo surgery during follow-up. The 30-day mortality for these patients was 14.3 % and overall mortality was 37.8 %. Most patients who died within the first 30 days after ER presentation had not undergone any surgery after presentation (89.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

There is great variation in mortality rates for cancer patients presenting at the ER for surgical consultation. The mortality in this study was greatest for patients with progressive disease (30-day mortality 25.5 % and overall mortality 62.8 %), and the majority of patients who died within 30 days (89.5 %) had not undergone surgery after ER presentation. Surgery should only be performed in the acute setting when essential and when the expected outcome is favorable for the patient.