1
|
Noy TB, Tzur Y, Brezinov Y, Matanes E, Lau S, Salvador S, Brodeur MN, Gotlieb W. BPI24-011: Impact of Obesity on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Patients With Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia Undergoing Robotic Surgery. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2024; 22:BPI24-011. [PMID: 38579771 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Tomer Bar Noy
- 1Lady Davis Institute at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Yossi Tzur
- 1Lady Davis Institute at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Yoav Brezinov
- 1Lady Davis Institute at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Susie Lau
- 1Lady Davis Institute at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- 1Lady Davis Institute at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Walter Gotlieb
- 1Lady Davis Institute at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lau S, Shum HP, Chan CCY, Man MY, Tang KB, Chan KKC, Leung AKH, Yan WW. Prediction of hospital mortality among critically ill patients in a single centre in Asia: comparison of artificial neural networks and logistic regression-based model. Hong Kong Med J 2024; 30:130-138. [PMID: 38545639 DOI: 10.12809/hkmj2210235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study compared the performance of the artificial neural network (ANN) model with the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and IV models for predicting hospital mortality among critically ill patients in Hong Kong. METHODS This retrospective analysis included all patients admitted to the intensive care unit of Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital from January 2010 to December 2019. The ANN model was constructed using parameters identical to the APACHE IV model. Discrimination performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC); calibration performance was evaluated using the Brier score and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic. RESULTS In total, 14 503 patients were included, with 10% in the validation set and 90% in the ANN model development set. The ANN model (AUROC=0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.86-0.90, Brier score=0.10; P in Hosmer-Lemeshow test=0.37) outperformed the APACHE II model (AUROC=0.85, 95% CI=0.80-0.85, Brier score=0.14; P<0.001 for both comparisons of AUROCs and Brier scores) but showed performance similar to the APACHE IV model (AUROC=0.87, 95% CI=0.85-0.89, Brier score=0.11; P=0.34 for comparison of AUROCs, and P=0.05 for comparison of Brier scores). The ANN model demonstrated better calibration than the APACHE II and APACHE IV models. CONCLUSION Our ANN model outperformed the APACHE II model but was similar to the APACHE IV model in terms of predicting hospital mortality in Hong Kong. Artificial neural networks are valuable tools that can enhance real-time prognostic prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lau
- Department of Anaesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - H P Shum
- Department of Intensive Care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - C C Y Chan
- Department of Intensive Care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - M Y Man
- Department of Intensive Care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - K B Tang
- Department of Intensive Care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - K K C Chan
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - A K H Leung
- Department of Intensive Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - W W Yan
- Department of Intensive Care, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laskov I, Michaan N, Zeng X, Salvador S, Lau S, Gilbert L, Gotlieb WH, Kessous R. The Impact of Intrauterine Manipulators on Outcome and Recurrence Patterns of Endometrial Cancer Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2024; 33:355-363. [PMID: 38170184 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of manipulators on the outcome of women who had minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients operated with or without an intrauterine manipulator. Results: Six hundred ninety-nine patients were included. The median follow-up was 44 months (range, 29-67). Nineteen (8.8%) patients had positive cytology in the manipulator group versus 21 (4.4%) in the comparison group (p = 0.02). Total recurrence rate was similar between the groups (12.3% vs. 11.9%; p = 0.8). Vaginal vault recurrence was the most common site of recurrence with higher incidence in the manipulator group (4.5% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis of low-risk patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment showed higher recurrence rate (8.3% vs. 3%; p = 0.023) and worse disease-free survival (p = 0.01) for the manipulator group. After controlling for other variables, the use of a manipulator did not affect the risk of recurrence for the whole cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; confidence interval [95% CI], 0.7-2.1, p = 0.3) and for the low-risk subgroup of patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 0.8-7, p = 0.08). Conclusion: The use of a manipulator increases the risk of positive cytology as well as vaginal vault recurrences, but it does not reduce the overall survival of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Laskov
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nadav Michaan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Xing Zeng
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Lucy Gilbert
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Roy Kessous
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Levin G, Matanes E, Brezinov Y, Ferenczy A, Pelmus M, Brodeur MN, Salvador S, Lau S, Gotlieb WH. Machine learning for prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:108006. [PMID: 38342041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify predictive clinico-pathologic factors for concurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) using machine learning. METHODS a retrospective analysis of 160 patients with a biopsy proven EIN. We analyzed the performance of multiple machine learning models (n = 48) with different parameters to predict the diagnosis of postoperative EC. The prediction variables included: parity, gestations, sampling method, endometrial thickness, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, serum CA-125, preoperative histology and preoperative hormonal therapy. Python 'sklearn' library was used to train and test the models. The model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUC. Five iterations of internal cross-validation were performed, and the mean values were used to compare between the models. RESULTS Of the 160 women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN, 37.5% (60) had a post-op diagnosis of EC. In univariable analysis, there were no significant predictors of EIN. For the five best machine learning models, all the models had a high specificity (71%-88%) and a low sensitivity (23%-51%). Logistic regression model had the highest specificity 88%, XG Boost had the highest sensitivity 51%, and the highest positive predictive value 62% and negative predictive value 73%. The highest area under the curve was achieved by the random forest model 0.646. CONCLUSIONS Even using the most elaborate AI algorithms, it is not possible currently to predict concurrent EC in women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN. As women with EIN have a high risk of concurrent EC, there may be a value of surgical staging including sentinel lymph node evaluation, to more precisely direct adjuvant treatment in the event EC is identified on final pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Levin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Emad Matanes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yoav Brezinov
- Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alex Ferenczy
- Department of Pathology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Manuela Pelmus
- Department of Pathology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kadoch E, Brezinov Y, Levin G, Racovitan F, Lau S, Salvador S, Gotlieb WH. The impact of body mass index on robotic surgery outcomes in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 185:51-57. [PMID: 38368813 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare surgical outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic surgery across different BMI categories. METHODS A retrospective study including all consecutive patients with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic surgery at a tertiary cancer center between December 2007 and December 2022. The study analyzed outcome measures, including blood loss, surgical times, length of hospitalization, perioperative complications, and conversion rates with the Kruskal-Wallis test for BMI group differences and the Chi-squared test for associations between categorical variables. RESULTS A total of 1329 patients with endometrial cancer were included in the study. Patients were stratified by BMI: <30.0 (n = 576; 43.3%), 30.0-39.9 (n = 449; 33.8%), and ≥ 40.0 (n = 304; 22.9%). There were no significant differences in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay (p = 0.105) and hospital stay (p = 0.497) between the groups. The rate of post-op complications was similar across the groups, ranging from 8.0% to 9.5% (p = 0.761). The rate of conversion to laparotomy was also similar across the groups, ranging from 0.7% to 1.0% (p = 0.885). Women with a BMI ≥40.0 had a non-clinically relevant but greater median estimated blood loss (30 mL vs. 20 mL; p < 0.001) and longer median operating room (OR) time (288 min vs. 270 min; p < 0.001). Within the OR time, the median set-up time was longer for those with a higher BMI (58 min vs. 50 min; p < 0.001). However, skin-to-skin time (209 min vs. 203 min; p = 0.202) and post-op time (14 min vs. 13 min; p = 0.094) were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION BMI does not affect the peri-operative outcome of patients undergoing robotic staging procedures for endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Kadoch
- Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Yoav Brezinov
- Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gabriel Levin
- Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Florentin Racovitan
- Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Levin G, Matanes E, Salvador S, Lau S, Gotlieb W. Time interval from biopsy of endometrial atypical hyperplasia to surgery and risk for concurrent endometrial carcinoma - A retrospective study. BJOG 2024. [PMID: 38232986 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Levin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emad Matanes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Walter Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Piodena-Aportadera MRB, Lau S, Tan CN, Chew J, Lim JP, Ismail NH, Ding YY, Lim WS. Yubi-Wakka Test for Sarcopenia Screening in the Community: Comparative Agreement, Diagnostic Performance and Validity with Calf Circumference Measurements. J Frailty Aging 2024; 13:98-107. [PMID: 38616365 DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2024.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening tools such as calf circumference (CC) and Yubi-wakka (finger-ring) test have been recognized as effective tools by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS'19) for sarcopenia screening but their comparative agreement, diagnostic performance and validity are unclear. OBJECTIVES This study aims to determine: (i)agreement between calf and finger-ring circumference, (ii)diagnostic performance for low muscle mass and AWGS'19 sarcopenia diagnosis, (iii)correlation with muscle mass, strength, and physical performance, and (iv)association with frailty, life space mobility and physical activity. METHODS We studied 187 healthy community-dwelling older adults (mean age=66.8+7.0years) from the GERILABS-2 study. CC was measured via (i) both calves in sitting and standing positions, and (ii) Yubi-wakka test by encircling the thickest part of the non-dominant calf with index fingers and thumbs of both hands. We performed Cohen's kappa to check for agreement, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to compare diagnostic performance, partial correlations adjusted for age and gender to compare convergent validity, and logistic regression to determine predictive validity for outcome measures. RESULTS Sarcopenia prevalence was 24.0% (AWGS'19). Yubi-wakka identified 16.6% of participants as screen-positive ("smaller"), showing moderate agreement only with non-dominant sitting CC measurements (k=0.421,p<0.001) and having lower diagnostic performance in determining low muscle mass (AUC=0.591 vs 0.855-0.870,p<0.001; sensitivity=57.1% vs 75.5-90.8%; specificity=58.4% vs 70.8-80.9%) and sarcopenia diagnosis (AUC=0.581 vs 0.788-0.818,p<0.001; sensitivity=55.6% vs 57.5-71.8%; specificity=74.4% vs 75.6-88.9%) compared to CC measurements. Yubi-wakka correlated significantly with muscle mass, grip strength and knee extension but not physical performance. When adjusted for age, gender and hypertension, Yubi-wakka was significantly associated with frailty (OR=3.96,95%CI:1.09-14.38), life space mobility (OR=2.38,95%CI:1.08-5.24) and physical activity (OR=2.50,95%CI:1.07-5.86). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Yubi-wakka provides a self-administered, low-cost and practicable community screening tool for sarcopenia. Our study affirmed the convergent and predictive validity of Yubi-wakka, albeit with lower sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic performance compared to CC measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R B Piodena-Aportadera
- Wee Shiong Lim, Institute of Geriatrics and Active Aging, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore 308433,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mitric C, Lakabi R, Kligun G, Matanes E, Lau S, Gotlieb WH, Salvador S. Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2023; 43:2162866. [PMID: 36689210 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2162866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Endocervical sampling is performed traditionally with an endocervical curette (ECC). The current study objective is to compare the histopathological performance of endocervical brush (ECB) and endocervical curette (ECC). A retrospective review was performed including patients included that underwent colposcopy with endocervical sampling using either method. A total of 127 samples were obtained with ECC and 98 with ECB. Histopathological diagnosis was obtained in 124 (97.6%) ECC samples and in 94 (95.9%) ECB samples (p = 0.46). The incidence of benign results was similar between ECC and ECB (117 (92.1%) versus 88 (89.8%) respectively (p = 0.28)). When combining information from endocervical sampling with cervical biopsies, the detection rate of high-grade pathologies was similar between the groups with 14 cases (17.7%) for ECC and 8 cases (17.0%) for ECB (p = 0.43). A scope review of the topic was performed, illustrating that studies favour either method. In conclusion, ECB and ECC perform similarly for providing a histopathological diagnosis on endocervical samples.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Endocervical samples in colposcopy were traditionally obtained using an endocervical curette. Similarly, a brush can be used for histological sampling of the endocervical canal. However, it is unclear how the ability to obtain a histopathological diagnosis compares between the two techniques.What do the results of this study add? This single-institution experience with using endocervical brush and curette for endocervical sampling finds that both methods are acceptable and have a high ability to provide a histopathological diagnosis. Precisely, 4.1% of brush and 2.4% of curette samples had insufficient tissue.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and further research? The endocervical brush is an adequate sampling method for colposcopy, and can be safely used instead of the curette, based on clinician preference. Further studies could investigate how these methods compare from a patient perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Mitric
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Rosa Lakabi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Gilit Kligun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Emad Matanes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hellings PW, Lau S, Scadding GK, Bjermer L, Backer V, Chaker AM, Conti DM, De Corso E, Diamant Z, Djukanovic R, Fokkens W, Gevaert P, Gray CL, Han JK, Heaney LG, Hoffmann HJ, Jesenak M, Johansen P, Kumaran MS, McDonald M, Melén E, Mullol J, Reitsma S, Ryan D, Scadding G, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Teeling T, Odemyr M, Wahn U. EUFOREA summit in Brussels 2023: inspiring the future of allergy & respiratory care. Front Allergy 2023; 4:1236977. [PMID: 37577332 PMCID: PMC10415067 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1236977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
In March 2023, the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airways diseases (EUFOREA) organized its bi-annual Summit in Brussels with expert panel members of EUFOREA, representatives of the EUFOREA patient advisory board, and the EUFOREA board and management teams. Its aim was to define the research, educational and advocacy initiatives to be developed by EUFOREA over the next 2 years until the 10th anniversary in 2025. EUFOREA is an international non-for-profit organization forming an alliance of all stakeholders dedicated to reducing the prevalence and burden of chronic allergic and respiratory diseases via research, education, and advocacy. Based on its medical scientific core competency, EUFOREA offers an evidence-supported platform to introduce innovation and education in healthcare leading to optimal patient care, bridging the gap between latest scientific evidence and daily practice. Aligned with the mission of improving health care, the expert panels of asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR), chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) & European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS), allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and paediatrics have proposed and elaborated a variety of activities that correspond to major unmet needs in the allergy and respiratory field. The current report provides a concise overview of the achievements, ambitions, and action plan of EUFOREA for the future, allowing all stakeholders in the allergy and respiratory field to be up-dated and inspired to join forces in Europe and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. W. Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - S. Lau
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - G. K. Scadding
- Department of Allergy & Rhinology, Royal National ENT Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Immunity and Infection, University College, London, United Kingdom
| | - L. Bjermer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology, Institute for Clinical Science, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - V. Backer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A. M. Chaker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Center for Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - D. M. Conti
- The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases Scientific Expert Team Members, Brussels, Belgium
| | - E. De Corso
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Z. Diamant
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology, Institute for Clinical Science, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Dept of Microbiology Immunology & Transplantation, KU Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R. Djukanovic
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - W. Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - P. Gevaert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - C. L. Gray
- Division of Allergy, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
- Specialist Allergist, Kidsallergy Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - J. K. Han
- Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States
| | - L. G. Heaney
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - H. J. Hoffmann
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M. Jesenak
- Department of Pulmonology and Phthisiology, Department of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Hospital in Martin, Martin, Slovakia
| | - P. Johansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M. S. Kumaran
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - M. McDonald
- Mediclinic Sandton, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - E. Melén
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet and Sachs’ Children and Youth Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J. Mullol
- Rhinology Unit and Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic, FRCB-IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, CIBERES, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - S. Reitsma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - D. Ryan
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- International Primary Care Respiratory Group., Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - G. Scadding
- Allergy, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - P. Schmid-Grendelmeier
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Christine-Kühne Center for Allergy research and Education CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland
| | - T. Teeling
- Patient Advisory Board of the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M. Odemyr
- Patient Advisory Board of the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases, Brussels, Belgium
| | - U. Wahn
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lau S, Wiedmann M, Adalja A. Economic and environmental analysis of processing plant interventions to reduce fluid milk waste. J Dairy Sci 2023:S0022-0302(23)00308-9. [PMID: 37268573 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-23019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
With the increased awareness about the economic and environmental impact of food waste, many interventions along food supply chains have been proposed to mitigate food waste. Even though interventions used to target food waste usually revolve around logistics and operations management, we highlight a unique solution to address this issue, specifically for fluid milk. We target the intrinsic quality of fluid milk by evaluating interventions that will extend the product shelf life. We used data from a previous fluid milk spoilage simulation model, collected price and product information from retail stores, conducted an expert elicitation, and used hedonic price regressions to determine the private and social gains to the dairy processing plant when implementing 5 different interventions to extend shelf life. Our data suggest that the value of each additional day of shelf life is approximately $0.03 and indicate that increasing periodic equipment cleaning is the most cost-effective strategy for processing plants to achieve fluid milk shelf-life improvements, both from a firm's economic standpoint and from an environmental standpoint. Importantly, the approaches reported here will be valuable to help individual firms to generate customized facility and firm specific assessments that identify the most appropriate strategies for extending the shelf life of different dairy products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lau
- Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - M Wiedmann
- Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - A Adalja
- Nolan School of Hotel Administration, SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Piedimonte S, Helpman L, Pond G, Nelson G, Kwon J, Altman A, Feigenberg T, Elit L, Lau S, Sabourin J, Samouelian V, Willows K, Aubrey C, Jang JH, Teo-Fortin LA, Cockburn N, Saunders NB, Shamiya S, Vicus D, Plante M. Surgical margin status in relation to surgical approach in the management of early-stage cervical Cancer: A Canadian cervical Cancer collaborative (4C) study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:21-27. [PMID: 37146436 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surgical margin status in women undergoing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer is an important prognostic factor. We sought to determine whether close (<3 mm) and positive surgical margins are associated with surgical approach and survival. METHODS This is a national retrospective cohort study of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Patients with stage IA1/LVSI-Ib2(FIGO 2018) with lesions up to 4 cm at 11 Canadian institutions from 2007 to 2019 were included. Surgical approach included robotic/laparoscopic (LRH), abdominal (ARH) or combined laparoscopic-assisted vaginal/vaginal (LVRH) radical hysterectomy. Recurrence free survival(RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Chi-square and log-rank tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS 956 patients met inclusion criteria. Surgical margins were as follows: negative (87.0%), positive (0.4%) or close <3 mm (6.8%), missing (5.8%). Most patients had squamous histology (46.9%); 34.6% had adenocarcinomas and 11.3% adenosquamous. Most were stage IB (75.1%) and 24.9% were IA. Mode of surgery included: LRH(51.8%), ARH (39.2%), LVRH (8.9%). Predictive factors for close/positive margins included stage, tumour diameter, vaginal involvement and parametrial extension. Surgical approach was not associated with margin status (p = 0.27). Close/positive margins were associated with a higher risk of death on univariate analysis (HR = non calculable for positive and HR = 1.83 for close margins, p = 0.017), but not significant for OS when adjusted for stage, histology, surgical approach and adjuvant treatment. There were 7 recurrences in patients with close margins (10.3%, p = 0.25). 71.5% with positive/close margins received adjuvant treatment. In addition, MIS was associated with a higher risk of death (OR = 2.39, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION Surgical approach was not associated to close or positive margins. Close surgical margins were associated with a higher risk of death. MIS was associated with worse survival, suggesting that margin status may not be the driver of worse survival in these cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Piedimonte
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Limor Helpman
- Department of biostatistics, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton Health Sciences, Canada
| | - Gregory Pond
- Department of biostatistics, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton Health Sciences, Canada
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
| | - Janice Kwon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alon Altman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Tomer Feigenberg
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Trillium Health partners, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Laurie Elit
- Department of biostatistics, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton Health Sciences, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jeanelle Sabourin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Vanessa Samouelian
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Karla Willows
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Halifax, Halifax, Canada
| | - Christa Aubrey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Ji-Hyun Jang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ly-Ann Teo-Fortin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Norah Cockburn
- Department of biostatistics, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton Health Sciences, Canada
| | - Nora-Beth Saunders
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Sarah Shamiya
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Marie Plante
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abitbol J, Kucukyazici B, Brin S, Lau S, Salvador S, Ramanakumar AV, Kessous R, Kogan L, Fletcher JD, Pare-Miron V, Liu G, Gotlieb WH. Impact of robotic surgery on patient flow and resource use intensity in ovarian cancer. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:537-547. [PMID: 35927390 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01447-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
There is an emerging focus on the role of robotic surgery in ovarian cancer. To date, the operational and cost implications of the procedure remain unknown. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of integrating minimally invasive robotic surgery on patient flow, resource utilization, and hospital costs associated with the treatment of ovarian cancer during the in-hospital and post-discharge processes. 261 patients operated for the primary treatment of ovarian cancer between January 2006 and November 2014 at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital were included in this study. Outcomes were compared by surgical approach (robotic vs. open surgery) as well as pre- and post-implementation of the robotics platform for use in ovarian cancer. The in-hospital patient flow and number of emergency room visits within 3 months of surgery were evaluated using multi-state Markov models and generalized linear regression models, respectively. Robotic surgery cases were associated with lower rates of postoperative complications, resulted in a more expedited postoperative patient flow (e.g., shorter time in the recovery room, ICU, and inpatient ward), and were between $10,376 and $7,421 less expensive than the average laparotomy, depending on whether or not depreciation and amortization of the robotic platform were included. After discharge, patients who underwent robotic surgery were less likely to return to the ER (IRR 0.42, p = 0.02, and IRR 0.47, p = 0.055, in the univariate and multivariable models, respectively). With appropriate use of the technology, the addition of robotics to the medical armamentarium for the management of ovarian cancer, when clinically feasible, can bring about operational efficiencies and entails cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremie Abitbol
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Beste Kucukyazici
- Eli Broad College of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Sonya Brin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | | | - Roy Kessous
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Liron Kogan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - John D Fletcher
- Solidage Research Group, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Canada
| | - Valerie Pare-Miron
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Gilbert Liu
- Hôpital Du Haut-Richelieu, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jamieson A, Huvila J, Leung S, Chiu D, Thompson EF, Lum A, Kinloch M, Helpman L, Salvador S, Vicus D, Kean S, Samouelian V, Grondin K, Irving J, Offman S, Parra-Herran C, Lau S, Scott S, Plante M, McConechy MK, Huntsman DG, Talhouk A, Kommoss S, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN. Molecular subtype stratified outcomes according to adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:282-289. [PMID: 36753816 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent data support the predictive implications of molecular subtype assignment in endometrial cancer (EC). Our objective was to retrospectively assess clinical outcomes according to adjuvant treatment received within EC molecular subtypes. METHODS Clinical outcomes (disease-specific and progression-free survival DSS/PFS) of EC patients from a single institution and population-based cohorts that had undergone molecular classification were assessed with respect to adjuvant therapy received and 2016 ESMO risk group. RESULTS 2472 ECs were assessed; 184 (7.4%) POLEmut, 638 (25.8%) MMRd, 1223 (49.5%) NSMP and 427 (17.3%) p53abn. N = 774 (34.6%) of the cohort were ESMO 2016 high risk and 109 (4.8%) were advanced or metastatic. In patients with MMRd EC, assessed across and within stage, there was no observed benefit in DSS or PFS with the addition of chemotherapy +/- radiation compared to radiation alone in ESMO high risk (p = 0.694) or ESMO high, advanced, metastatic risk groups combined (p = 0.852). In patients with p53abn EC, adjuvant chemotherapy given with radiation was associated with significantly longer DSS compared to radiation alone in ESMO high risk (p = 0.007) and ESMO high, advanced and metastatic risk groups combined (p = 0.015), even when restricted to stage I disease (p < 0.001) and when compared in serous vs. non-serous histotypes (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with more favorable outcomes for patients with p53abn EC, including stage I disease and non-serous histotypes, but does not appear to add benefit within MMRd ECs for any stage of disease, consistent with PORTEC-3 molecular subanalysis. Prospective trials, assessing treatment efficacy within molecular subtype are needed, however these 'real-world' data should be considered when discussing adjuvant treatment with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Jamieson
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jutta Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Samuel Leung
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Derek Chiu
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Emily F Thompson
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Amy Lum
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mary Kinloch
- Department of Pathology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Limor Helpman
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sarah Kean
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Vanessa Samouelian
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Julie Irving
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Saul Offman
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | | | - Susie Lau
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Stephanie Scott
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Marie Plante
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Imagia Canexia Health, Inc., Vancouver, Canada
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bousquet J, Melén E, Haahtela T, Koppelman GH, Togias A, Valenta R, Akdis CA, Czarlewski W, Rothenberg M, Valiulis A, Wickmann M, Aguilar D, Akdis M, Ansotegui IJ, Barbara C, Bedbrook A, Bindslev Jensen C, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Boulet LP, Brightling CE, Brussino L, Burte E, Bustamante M, Canonica GW, Cecchi L, Celedon JC, Chaves-Loureiro C, Costa E, Cruz AA, Erhola M, Gemicioglu B, Fokkens WJ, Garcia Aymerich J, Guerra S, Heinrich J, Ivancevich JC, Keil T, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kupczyk M, Kvedariene V, Larenas-Linnemann DE, Lemonnier N, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Louis R, Makris M, Maurer M, Momas I, Morais-Almeida M, Mullol J, Naclerio RN, Nadeau K, Nadif R, Niedoszytko M, Okamoto Y, Ollert M, Papadopoulos NG, Passalacqua G, Patella V, Pawankar R, Pham-Thi N, Pfaar O, Regateiro FS, Ring J, Rouadi PW, Samolinski B, Sastre J, Savouré M, Scichilone N, Shamji MH, Sheikh A, Siroux V, Sousa-Pinto B, Standl M, Sunyer J, Taborda-Barata L, Toppila-Salmi S, Torres MJ, Tsiligianni I, Valovirta E, Vandenplas O, Ventura MT, Weiss S, Yorgancioglu A, Zhang L, Abdul Latiff AH, Aberer W, Agache I, Al-Ahmad M, Alobid I, Arshad HS, Asayag E, Baharudin A, Battur L, Bennoor KS, Berghea EC, Bergmann KC, Bernstein D, Bewick M, Blain H, Bonini M, Braido F, Buhl R, Bumbacea R, Bush A, Calderon M, Calvo G, Camargos P, Caraballo L, Cardona V, Carr W, Carreiro-Martins P, Casale T, Cepeda Sarabia AM, Chandrasekharan R, Charpin D, Chen YZ, Cherrez-Ojeda I, Chivato T, Chkhartishvili E, Christoff G, Chu DK, Cingi C, Correia da Sousa J, Corrigan C, Custovic A, D'Amato G, Del Giacco S, De Blay F, Devillier P, Didier A, do Ceu Teixeira M, Dokic D, Douagui H, Doulaptsi M, Durham S, Dykewicz M, Eiwegger T, El-Sayed ZA, Emuzyte R, Emuzyte R, Fiocchi A, Fyhrquist N, Gomez RM, Gotua M, Guzman MA, Hagemann J, Hamamah S, Halken S, Halpin DMG, Hofmann M, Hossny E, Hrubiško M, Irani C, Ispayeva Z, Jares E, Jartti T, Jassem E, Julge K, Just J, Jutel M, Kaidashev I, Kalayci O, Kalyoncu O, Kardas P, Kirenga B, Kraxner H, Kull I, Kulus M, La Gruta S, Lau S, Le Tuyet Thi L, Levin M, Lipworth B, Lourenço O, Mahboub B, Mäkelä MJ, Martinez-Infante E, Matricardi P, Miculinic N, Migueres N, Mihaltan F, Mohamad Y, Moniusko M, Montefort S, Neffen H, Nekam K, Nunes E, Nyembue Tshipukane D, O'Hehir RE, Ogulur I, Ohta K, Okubo K, Ouedraogo S, Olze H, Pali-Schöll I, Palomares O, Palosuo K, Panaitescu C, Panzner P, Park HS, Pitsios C, Plavec D, Popov TA, Puggioni F, Quirce S, Recto M, Repka-Ramirez R, Roballo-Cordeiro C, Roche N, Rodriguez-Gonzales M, Romantowski J, Rosario Filho N, Rottem M, Sagara H, Sarquis-Serpa F, Sayah Z, Scheire S, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Sisul JC, Sole D, Soto-Martinez M, Sova M, Sperl A, Spranger O, Stelmach R, Suppli Ulrik C, Thomas M, To T, Todo-Bom A, Tomazic PV, Urrutia-Pereira M, Valentin-Rostan M, van Ganse E, Van Hage M, Vasankari T, Vichyanond P, Viegi G, Wallace D, Wang DY, Williams S, Worm M, Yiallouros P, Yiallouros P, Yusuf O, Zaitoun F, Zernotti M, Zidarn M, Zuberbier J, Fonseca JA, Zuberbier T, Anto JM. Rhinitis associated with asthma is distinct from rhinitis alone: The ARIA-MeDALL hypothesis. Allergy 2023; 78:1169-1203. [PMID: 36799120 DOI: 10.1111/all.15679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Asthma, rhinitis and atopic dermatitis (AD) are interrelated clinical phenotypes that partly overlap in the human interactome. The concept of "one-airway-one-disease", coined over 20 years ago, is a simplistic approach of the links between upper- and lower-airway allergic diseases. With new data, it is time to reassess the concept. This article reviews (i) the clinical observations that led to Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA), (ii) new insights into polysensitisation and multimorbidity, (iii) advances in mHealth for novel phenotype definition, (iv) confirmation in canonical epidemiologic studies, (v) genomic findings, (vi) treatment approaches and (vii) novel concepts on the onset of rhinitis and multimorbidity. One recent concept, bringing together upper- and lower-airway allergic diseases with skin, gut and neuropsychiatric multimorbidities, is the "Epithelial Barrier Hypothesis". This review determined that the "one-airway-one-disease" concept does not always hold true and that several phenotypes of disease can be defined. These phenotypes include an extreme "allergic" (asthma) phenotype combining asthma, rhinitis and conjunctivitis. Rhinitis alone and rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity represent two distinct diseases with the following differences: (i) genomic and transcriptomic background (Toll-Like Receptors and IL-17 for rhinitis alone as a local disease; IL-33 and IL-5 for allergic and non-allergic multimorbidity as a systemic disease), (ii) allergen sensitisation patterns (mono- or pauci-sensitisation versus polysensitisation), (iii) severity of symptoms and (iv) treatment response. In conclusion, rhinitis alone (local disease) and rhinitis with asthma multimorbidity (systemic disease) should be considered as two distinct diseases, possibly modulated by the microbiome, and may be a model for understanding the epidemics of chronic and auto-immune diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Bousquet
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany.,University Hospital Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Inserm, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - E Melén
- Sach´s Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, and Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - T Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - G H Koppelman
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, GRIAC Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - A Togias
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, USA
| | - R Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - W Czarlewski
- Medical Consulting Czarlewski, Levallois, France.,MASK-air, Montpellier, France
| | - M Rothenberg
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - A Valiulis
- Institute of Clinical Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Medical Faculty of Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - M Wickmann
- Institute of Environmental medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Aguilar
- Biomedical Research Networking Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - I J Ansotegui
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Hospital Quironsalud Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain
| | - C Barbara
- Portuguese Nacional Programme for Respiratory Diseases, Direção -Geral da Saúde, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Instituto de Saúde Ambiental, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - C Bindslev Jensen
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), and Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Finland
| | - S Bosnic-Anticevich
- Quality Use of Respiratory Medicine Group, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - L P Boulet
- Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - C E Brightling
- Institute of Lung Health, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Respiratory and Infection Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - L Brussino
- Department of Medical Sciences, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.,Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - E Burte
- Inserm, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - M Bustamante
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.,ISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G W Canonica
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - L Cecchi
- SOS Allergology and Clinical Immunology, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - J C Celedon
- Division of Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - C Chaves-Loureiro
- Pneumology Unit, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - E Costa
- UCIBIO, REQUINTE, Faculty of Pharmacy and Competence Center on Active and Healthy Ageing of University of Porto (Porto4Ageing), Porto, Portugal
| | - A A Cruz
- Fundaçao ProAR, Federal University of Bahia and GARD/WHO Planning Group, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - M Erhola
- Pirkanmaa Welfare district, Tampere, Finland
| | - B Gemicioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - W J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Garcia Aymerich
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.,ISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Guerra
- Asthma and Airway Disease Research Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - J Heinrich
- Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, University Hospital Munich - Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Munich
| | - J C Ivancevich
- Servicio de Alergia e Immunologia, Clinica Santa Isabel, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - T Keil
- Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.,State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Erlangen, Germany
| | - L Klimek
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany.,Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - P Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - M Kupczyk
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - V Kvedariene
- Institute of Clinical medicine, Clinic of Chest diseases and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - D E Larenas-Linnemann
- Center of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy, Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, México City, Mexico
| | - N Lemonnier
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences, UGA - INSERM U1209 - CNRS UMR5309, Site Santé, Allée des Alpes, La Tronche, France
| | | | - R Louis
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, CHU, Liege, Liège, Belgium.,GIGA I3 research group, University of Liege, Belgium
| | - M Makris
- Allergy Unit "D Kalogeromitros", 2nd Dpt of Dermatology and Venereology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University Hospital, Greece
| | - M Maurer
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - I Momas
- Department of Public health and health products, Paris Descartes University-Sorbonne Paris Cité, EA 4064 and Paris Municipal Department of social action, childhood, and health, Paris, France
| | | | - J Mullol
- Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.,Clinical & Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - R N Naclerio
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery - Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - K Nadeau
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford, USA
| | - R Nadif
- Inserm, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - M Niedoszytko
- Department of Allergology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Y Okamoto
- Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.,Chiba Rosai Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - M Ollert
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), and Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Finland.,Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - N G Papadopoulos
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - G Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - V Patella
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, "Santa Maria della Speranza" Hospital, Battipaglia, Salerno, Italy.,Agency of Health ASL, Salerno, Italy
| | - R Pawankar
- Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - N Pham-Thi
- Ecole Polytechnique Palaiseau, IRBA (Institut de Recherche bio-Médicale des Armées), Bretigny, France
| | - O Pfaar
- Section of Rhinology and Allergy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - F S Regateiro
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (ICBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Institute of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - J Ring
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-Care), Davos, Switzerland
| | - P W Rouadi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eye and Ear University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dar Al Shifa Hospital, Salmiya, Kuwait
| | - B Samolinski
- Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
| | - J Sastre
- Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, CIBERES, Faculty of Medicine, Autonoma University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Savouré
- Inserm, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - N Scichilone
- PROMISE Department, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - M H Shamji
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, and NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - A Sheikh
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - V Siroux
- INSERM, Université Grenoble Alpes, IAB, U 1209, Team of Environmental Epidemiology applied to Reproduction and Respiratory Health, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
| | - B Sousa-Pinto
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research; University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,RISE - Health Research Network; University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - M Standl
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - J Sunyer
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.,ISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Taborda-Barata
- Department of Immunoallergology, Cova da Beira University Hospital Centre, Covilhã, Portugal.,UBIAir - Clinical & Experimental Lung Centre and CICS-UBI Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - S Toppila-Salmi
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - M J Torres
- Allergy Unit, Málaga Regional University Hospital-IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - I Tsiligianni
- International Primary Care Respiratory Group IPCRG, Aberdeen, Scotland.,Health Planning Unit, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Greece
| | - E Valovirta
- Department of Lung Diseases and Clinical Immunology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Terveystalo Allergy Clinic, Turku, Finland
| | - O Vandenplas
- Department of Chest Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCL, Namur, and Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - M T Ventura
- Unit of Geriatric Immunoallergology, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - S Weiss
- Harvard Medical School and Channing Division of Network Medicine, Boston, USA
| | - A Yorgancioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - L Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital and Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China
| | - A H Abdul Latiff
- Allergy & Immunology Centre, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - W Aberer
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - I Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - M Al-Ahmad
- Microbiology Department, College of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - I Alobid
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
| | - H S Arshad
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton.,David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, Isle of Wight, UK
| | - E Asayag
- Argentine Society of Allergy and Immunopathology, Buenos Ayres, Argentian
| | - A Baharudin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - L Battur
- Mongolian Association of Hospital Managers, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | - K S Bennoor
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Institute of Diseases of the Chest and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - E C Berghea
- Department of Pediatrics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - K C Bergmann
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - D Bernstein
- Division of Immunology, Allergy and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - M Bewick
- University of Central Lancashire Medical School, Preston, UK
| | - H Blain
- Department of Geriatrics, Montpellier University hospital, MUSE, Montpellier, France
| | - M Bonini
- Department of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy and National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital & Imperial College London, UK
| | - F Braido
- University of Genoa, Department of Internal Medicine (DiMI), and IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - R Buhl
- Dept of Pulmonary Medicine, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany
| | - R Bumbacea
- Department of Allergy, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania
| | - A Bush
- Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Calderon
- Imperial College and National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
| | - G Calvo
- Pediatrics Department, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valvidia, Chile
| | - P Camargos
- Federal University of Minas Gerais, Medical School, Department of Pediatrics, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - L Caraballo
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Campus de Zaragocilla, Edificio Biblioteca Primer piso, Cartagena, Colombia
| | - V Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,ARADyAL research network, Barcelona, Spain
| | - W Carr
- Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California, A Medical Group , Southern California Research, Mission Viejo, CA, USA
| | - P Carreiro-Martins
- NOVA Medical School/Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Lisbon, Portugal.,Serviço de Imunoalergologia, Hospital de Dona Estefânia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - T Casale
- Division of Allergy/immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FLA, USA
| | - A M Cepeda Sarabia
- Allergy and Immunology Laboratory, Metropolitan University, Simon Bolivar University, Barranquilla, Colombia and SLaai, Sociedad Latinoamericana de Allergia, Asma e Immunologia, Branquilla, Columbia
| | - R Chandrasekharan
- Department of ENT, Badr al Samaa Hospital, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman
| | - D Charpin
- Clinique des bronches, allergie et sommeil, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Y Z Chen
- The capital institute of pediatrics, Beijing, China
| | - I Cherrez-Ojeda
- Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.,Respiralab Research Group, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador
| | - T Chivato
- School of Medicine, University CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Chkhartishvili
- David Tatishvili Medical Center; David Tvildiani Medical University-AIETI Medical School, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - G Christoff
- Medical University - Sofia, Faculty of Public Health, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - D K Chu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact & Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - C Cingi
- skisehir Osmangazi University, Medical Faculty, ENT Department, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - J Correia da Sousa
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - C Corrigan
- Division of Asthma, Allergy & Lung Biology, MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Custovic
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK
| | - G D'Amato
- Division of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases,Hospital 'A Cardarelli', University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - S Del Giacco
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health and Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital "Duilio Casula", University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - F De Blay
- Allergy Division, Chest Disease Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, and Federation of translational medicine, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - P Devillier
- VIM Suresnes, UMR 0892, Pôle des Maladies des Voies Respiratoires, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Suresnes, France
| | - A Didier
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Larrey Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - M do Ceu Teixeira
- Hospital Dr Agostinho Neto,Praia, Faculdade de Medicina de Cabo Verde
| | - D Dokic
- University Clinic of Pulmology and Allergy, Medical Faculty Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
| | - H Douagui
- Service de Pneumo-Allergologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Béni-Messous, Algiers, Algeria
| | - M Doulaptsi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Crete, Heraklion, Crete
| | - S Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - M Dykewicz
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - T Eiwegger
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Paediatrics, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Food allergy and Anaphylaxis Program, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Z A El-Sayed
- Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology Unit, Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - R Emuzyte
- Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - R Emuzyte
- Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - A Fiocchi
- Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy
| | - N Fyhrquist
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R M Gomez
- School of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Salta, Salta, Argentina
| | - M Gotua
- Center of Allergy and Immunology, Georgian Association of Allergology and Clinical Center of Allergy and Immunology, David Tvildiani Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - M A Guzman
- Immunology and Allergy Division, Clinical Hospital, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - J Hagemann
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany
| | - S Hamamah
- Biology of reproduction department, INSERM 1203, University hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - S Halken
- Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - D M G Halpin
- University of Exeter, Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - M Hofmann
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - E Hossny
- Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology Unit, Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - M Hrubiško
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Oncology Institute of St Elisabeth, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - C Irani
- Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, St Joseph University, Hotel Dieu de France Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Z Ispayeva
- President of Kazakhstan Association of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Allergology and clinical immunology of the Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - E Jares
- Servicio de Alergia, Consultorios Médicos Privados, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - T Jartti
- EDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - E Jassem
- Medical University of Gdańsk, Department of Pneumology, Gdansk, Poland
| | - K Julge
- Tartu University Institute of Clinical Medicine, Children's Clinic, Tartu, Estonia
| | - J Just
- Sorbonne université, Hôpital américain de Paris, Neuilly, France
| | - M Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.,ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - O Kalayci
- Pediatric Allergy and Asthma Unit, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - O Kalyoncu
- Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Department of Chest Diseases, Immunology and Allergy Division, Ankara, Turkey
| | - P Kardas
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - B Kirenga
- Makerere University Lung Institute, Kampala, Uganda
| | - H Kraxner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - I Kull
- Sach´s Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, and Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Kulus
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Diseases and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
| | - S La Gruta
- Institute of Translational Pharmacology, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy
| | - S Lau
- Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Crital Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - L Le Tuyet Thi
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hochiminh City, Vietnam
| | - M Levin
- Division Paediatric Allergology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - B Lipworth
- Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, Cardiovascular & Diabetes Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, UK
| | - O Lourenço
- Faculty of Health Sciences and CICS - UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - B Mahboub
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - M J Mäkelä
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - P Matricardi
- Pediatric Pulmonology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - N Migueres
- Allergy Division, Chest Disease Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, and Federation of translational medicine, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - F Mihaltan
- National Institute of Pneumology M Nasta, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Y Mohamad
- National Center for Research in Chronic Respiratory Diseases, Tishreen University School of Medicine, Latakia and Syrian Private University-, Damascus, Syria
| | - M Moniusko
- Department of Regenerative Medicine and Immune Regulation, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystock, Poland
| | - S Montefort
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, MSD, Malta
| | - H Neffen
- Director of Center of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Diseases, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - K Nekam
- Hungarian Allergy Association, Budapest, Hungary
| | - E Nunes
- Eduardo Mondlane University · Faculty of Medicine, Maputo, Mozambique
| | | | - R E O'Hehir
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - I Ogulur
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - K Ohta
- National Hospital Organization Tokyo National Hospital, and JATA Fukujuji Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Okubo
- Dept of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Ouedraogo
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pédiatrique Charles de Gaulle, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - H Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - I Pali-Schöll
- Dept of Comparative Medicine; Messerli Research Institute of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Medical University, and University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - O Palomares
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - K Palosuo
- Department of Dermatology, University of Helsinki and Hospital for Skin and Allergic Diseases, Helsinki, Finland
| | - C Panaitescu
- OncoGen Center, County Clinical Emergency Hospital "Pius Branzeu," and University of Medicine and Pharmacy V Babes, Timisoara, Romania
| | - P Panzner
- Department of Immunology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - H S Park
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | - C Pitsios
- Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - D Plavec
- Srebrnjak Children's Hospital, Zagreb; Medical Faculty, University JJ Strossmayer of Osijek, Croatia
| | - T A Popov
- Clinic of Occupational Diseases, University Hospital Sveti Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - F Puggioni
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - S Quirce
- QDepartment of Allergy, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - M Recto
- Asian Hospital And Medical Center, Manilla, Philippines
| | - R Repka-Ramirez
- Division of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Clinics Hospital, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
| | | | - N Roche
- Pneumologie, AP-HP, Centre Université de Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.,UMR 1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| | - M Rodriguez-Gonzales
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Hospital Espanol de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - J Romantowski
- Department of Allergology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - N Rosario Filho
- Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - M Rottem
- Division of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - H Sagara
- Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - F Sarquis-Serpa
- Asthma Reference Center - School of Medicine of Santa Casa de Misericórdia of Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil
| | - Z Sayah
- SMAIC Société Marocaine d' Allergologie et Immunologie Clinique, Rabat, Morocco
| | - S Scheire
- Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - P Schmid-Grendelmeier
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J C Sisul
- Allergy & Asthma, Medical Director, CLINICA SISUL, FACAAI, SPAAI, Asuncion, Paraguay
| | - D Sole
- Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M Soto-Martinez
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Nacional de Niños, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica
| | - M Sova
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Tuberculosis, University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - A Sperl
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Germany
| | - O Spranger
- Global Allergy and Asthma Platform GAAPP, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Stelmach
- Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital da Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - C Suppli Ulrik
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Thomas
- University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - T To
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Todo-Bom
- Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - P V Tomazic
- Dept of General ORL, H&NS, Medical University of Graz, ENT-University Hospital Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - E van Ganse
- Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - M Van Hage
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - T Vasankari
- Fihla, Finnish Lung Association, Helsinki, Finland.,University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Vichyanond
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Faculty of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - G Viegi
- Pulmonary Environmental Epidemiology Unit, CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa
| | - D Wallace
- Nova Southeastern University, Florida, USA
| | - D Y Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - S Williams
- International Primary Care Respiratory Group IPCRG, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - M Worm
- Division of Allergy and Immunology Department of Dermatology, Allergy and Venerology Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin, Germany
| | - P Yiallouros
- Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - P Yiallouros
- Medical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - O Yusuf
- The Allergy and Asthma Institute, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - F Zaitoun
- Lebanese-American University, Clemenceau Medical Center DHCC, Dubai, UAE
| | - M Zernotti
- Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Universidad Nacional de Villa Maria, Argentina
| | - M Zidarn
- University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia.,University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - J Zuberbier
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - J A Fonseca
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences; Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research; University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,RISE - Health Research Network; University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - T Zuberbier
- Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - J M Anto
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.,ISGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aubrey C, Pond GR, Helpman L, Vicus D, Elit L, Plante M, Lau S, Kwon JS, Altman AD, Willows K, Feigenberg T, Sabourin J, Samouelian V, Bernard L, Cockburn N, Saunders NB, Piedimonte S, Teo-Fortin LA, Kim SR, Sadeq N, Jang JH, Shamiya S, Nelson G. Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Treated Cervical Cancer with No Residual Disease on Hysterectomy Specimen: A 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) Working Group Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1977-1985. [PMID: 36826114 PMCID: PMC9955159 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of macroscopic cervical cancer leads to worse oncologic outcomes than with open surgery. Preoperative conization may mitigate the risk of surgical approach. Our objective was to describe the oncologic outcomes in cases of cervical cancer initially treated with conization, and subsequently found to have no residual cervical cancer after hysterectomy performed via open and minimally invasive approaches. This was a retrospective cohort study of surgically treated cervical cancer at 11 Canadian institutions from 2007 to 2017. Cases initially treated with cervical conization and subsequent hysterectomy, with no residual disease on hysterectomy specimen were included. They were subdivided according to minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic (MIS) or laparoscopically assisted vaginal/vaginal hysterectomy (LVH)), or abdominal (AH). Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Chi-square and log-rank tests were used to compare between cohorts. Within the total cohort, 238/1696 (14%) had no residual disease on hysterectomy specimen (122 MIS, 103 AH, and 13 VLH). The majority of cases in the cohort were FIGO 2018 stage IB1 (43.7%) and underwent a radical hysterectomy (81.9%). There was no statistical difference between stage, histology, and radical vs simple hysterectomy between the abdominal and minimally invasive groups. There were no significant differences in RFS (5-year: MIS/LVH 97.7%, AH 95.8%, p = 0.23) or OS (5-year: MIS/VLH 98.9%, AH 97.4%, p = 0.10), although event-rates were low. There were only two recurrences. In this large study including only patients with no residual cervical cancer on hysterectomy specimen, no significant differences in survival were seen by surgical approach. This may be due to the small number of events or due to no actual difference between the groups. Further studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Aubrey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-780-432-8337
| | - Gregory R. Pond
- Department of Oncology, Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Limor Helpman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Laurie Elit
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Marie Plante
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universite de Quebec, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Janice S. Kwon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Alon D. Altman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Winnipeg Women’s Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0L8, Canada
| | - Karla Willows
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3K 4N1, Canada
| | - Tomer Feigenberg
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON L5B 1B8, Canada
| | - Jeanelle Sabourin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
| | - Vanessa Samouelian
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Universite de Montreal, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Laurence Bernard
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Norah Cockburn
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Nora-Beth Saunders
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Winnipeg Women’s Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0L8, Canada
| | - Sabrina Piedimonte
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Ly-Ann Teo-Fortin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universite de Quebec, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Soyoun Rachel Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Noor Sadeq
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Center, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3K 4N1, Canada
| | - Ji-Hyun Jang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Sarah Shamiya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bakouny Z, Labaki C, Grover P, Awosika J, Gulati S, Hsu CY, Alimohamed SI, Bashir B, Berg S, Bilen MA, Bowles D, Castellano C, Desai A, Elkrief A, Eton OE, Fecher LA, Flora D, Galsky MD, Gatti-Mays ME, Gesenhues A, Glover MJ, Gopalakrishnan D, Gupta S, Halfdanarson TR, Hayes-Lattin B, Hendawi M, Hsu E, Hwang C, Jandarov R, Jani C, Johnson DB, Joshi M, Khan H, Khan SA, Knox N, Koshkin VS, Kulkarni AA, Kwon DH, Matar S, McKay RR, Mishra S, Moria FA, Nizam A, Nock NL, Nonato TK, Panasci J, Pomerantz L, Portuguese AJ, Provenzano D, Puc M, Rao YJ, Rhodes TD, Riely GJ, Ripp JJ, Rivera AV, Ruiz-Garcia E, Schmidt AL, Schoenfeld AJ, Schwartz GK, Shah SA, Shaya J, Subbiah S, Tachiki LM, Tucker MD, Valdez-Reyes M, Weissmann LB, Wotman MT, Wulff-Burchfield EM, Xie Z, Yang YJ, Thompson MA, Shah DP, Warner JL, Shyr Y, Choueiri TK, Wise-Draper TM, Gandhi R, Gartrell BA, Goel S, Halmos B, Makower DF, O' Sullivan D, Ohri N, Portes M, Shapiro LC, Shastri A, Sica RA, Verma AK, Butt O, Campian JL, Fiala MA, Henderson JP, Monahan RS, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Zhou AY, Bitran JD, Hallmeyer S, Mundt D, Pandravada S, Papaioannou PV, Patel M, Streckfuss M, Tadesse E, Gatson NTN, Kundranda MN, Lammers PE, Loree JM, Yu IS, Bindal P, Lam B, Peters MLB, Piper-Vallillo AJ, Egan PC, Farmakiotis D, Arvanitis P, Klein EJ, Olszewski AJ, Vieira K, Angevine AH, Bar MH, Del Prete SA, Fiebach MZ, Gulati AP, Hatton E, Houston K, Rose SJ, Steve Lo KM, Stratton J, Weinstein PL, Garcia JA, Routy B, Hoyo-Ulloa I, Dawsey SJ, Lemmon CA, Pennell NA, Sharifi N, Painter CA, Granada C, Hoppenot C, Li A, Bitterman DS, Connors JM, Demetri GD, Florez (Duma) N, Freeman DA, Giordano A, Morgans AK, Nohria A, Saliby RM, Tolaney SM, Van Allen EM, Xu WV, Zon RL, Halabi S, Zhang T, Dzimitrowicz H, Leighton JC, Graber JJ, Grivas P, Hawley JE, Loggers ET, Lyman GH, Lynch RC, Nakasone ES, Schweizer MT, Vinayak S, Wagner MJ, Yeh A, Dansoa Y, Makary M, Manikowski JJ, Vadakara J, Yossef K, Beckerman J, Goyal S, Messing I, Rosenstein LJ, Steffes DR, Alsamarai S, Clement JM, Cosin JA, Daher A, Dailey ME, Elias R, Fein JA, Hosmer W, Jayaraj A, Mather J, Menendez AG, Nadkarni R, Serrano OK, Yu PP, Balanchivadze N, Gadgeel SM, Accordino MK, Bhutani D, Bodin BE, Hershman DL, Masson C, Alexander M, Mushtaq S, Reuben DY, Bernicker EH, Deeken JF, Jeffords KJ, Shafer D, Cárdenas AI, Cuervo Campos R, De-la-Rosa-Martinez D, Ramirez A, Vilar-Compte D, Gill DM, Lewis MA, Low CA, Jones MM, Mansoor AH, Mashru SH, Werner MA, Cohen AM, McWeeney S, Nemecek ER, Williamson SP, Peters S, Smith SJ, Lewis GC, Zaren HA, Akhtari M, Castillo DR, Cortez K, Lau E, Nagaraj G, Park K, Reeves ME, O'Connor TE, Altman J, Gurley M, Mulcahy MF, Wehbe FH, Durbin EB, Nelson HH, Ramesh V, Sachs Z, Wilson G, Bardia A, Boland G, Gainor JF, Peppercorn J, Reynolds KL, Rosovsky RP, Zubiri L, Bekaii-Saab TS, Joyner MJ, Riaz IB, Senefeld JW, Shah S, Ayre SK, Bonnen M, Mahadevan D, McKeown C, Mesa RA, Ramirez AG, Salazar M, Shah PK, Wang CP, Bouganim N, Papenburg J, Sabbah A, Tagalakis V, Vinh DC, Nanchal R, Singh H, Bahadur N, Bao T, Belenkaya R, Nambiar PH, O’Cearbhaill RE, Papadopoulos EB, Philip J, Robson M, Rosenberg JE, Wilkins CR, Tamimi R, Cerrone K, Dill J, Faller BA, Alomar ME, Chandrasekhar SA, Hume EC, Islam JY, Ajmera A, Brouha SS, Cabal A, Choi S, Hsiao A, Jiang JY, Kligerman S, Park J, Razavi P, Reid EG, Bhatt PS, Mariano MG, Thomson CC, Glace M(G, Knoble JL, Rink C, Zacks R, Blau SH, Brown C, Cantrell AS, Namburi S, Polimera HV, Rovito MA, Edwin N, Herz K, Kennecke HF, Monfared A, Sautter RR, Cronin T, Elshoury A, Fleissner B, Griffiths EA, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri F, Jain P, Kariapper A, Levine E, Moffitt M, O'Connor TL, Smith LJ, Wicher CP, Zsiros E, Jabbour SK, Misdary CF, Shah MR, Batist G, Cook E, Ferrario C, Lau S, Miller WH, Rudski L, Santos Dutra M, Wilchesky M, Mahmood SZ, McNair C, Mico V, Dixon B, Kloecker G, Logan BB, Mandapakala C, Cabebe EC, Jha A, Khaki AR, Nagpal S, Schapira L, Wu JTY, Whaley D, Lopes GDL, de Cardenas K, Russell K, Stith B, Taylor S, Klamerus JF, Revankar SG, Addison D, Chen JL, Haynam M, Jhawar SR, Karivedu V, Palmer JD, Pillainayagam C, Stover DG, Wall S, Williams NO, Abbasi SH, Annis S, Balmaceda NB, Greenland S, Kasi A, Rock CD, Luders M, Smits M, Weiss M, Chism DD, Owenby S, Ang C, Doroshow DB, Metzger M, Berenberg J, Uyehara C, Fazio A, Huber KE, Lashley LN, Sueyoshi MH, Patel KG, Riess J, Borno HT, Small EJ, Zhang S, Andermann TM, Jensen CE, Rubinstein SM, Wood WA, Ahmad SA, Brownfield L, Heilman H, Kharofa J, Latif T, Marcum M, Shaikh HG, Sohal DPS, Abidi M, Geiger CL, Markham MJ, Russ AD, Saker H, Acoba JD, Choi H, Rho YS, Feldman LE, Gantt G, Hoskins KF, Khan M, Liu LC, Nguyen RH, Pasquinelli MM, Schwartz C, Venepalli NK, Vikas P, Zakharia Y, Friese CR, Boldt A, Gonzalez CJ, Su C, Su CT, Yoon JJ, Bijjula R, Mavromatis BH, Seletyn ME, Wood BR, Zaman QU, Kaklamani V, Beeghly A, Brown AJ, Charles LJ, Cheng A, Crispens MA, Croessmann S, Davis EJ, Ding T, Duda SN, Enriquez KT, French B, Gillaspie EA, Hausrath DJ, Hennessy C, Lewis JT, Li X(L, Prescott LS, Reid SA, Saif S, Slosky DA, Solorzano CC, Sun T, Vega-Luna K, Wang LL, Aboulafia DM, Carducci TM, Goldsmith KJ, Van Loon S, Topaloglu U, Moore J, Rice RL, Cabalona WD, Cyr S, Barrow McCollough B, Peddi P, Rosen LR, Ravindranathan D, Hafez N, Herbst RS, LoRusso P, Lustberg MB, Masters T, Stratton C. Interplay of Immunosuppression and Immunotherapy Among Patients With Cancer and COVID-19. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:128-134. [PMID: 36326731 PMCID: PMC9634600 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Importance Cytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation. Objective To determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings. Exposures Immunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm. Results The median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Bakouny
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chris Labaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Punita Grover
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Joy Awosika
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Shuchi Gulati
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Chih-Yuan Hsu
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Saif I Alimohamed
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Babar Bashir
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Aakash Desai
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Arielle Elkrief
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Omar E Eton
- Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mohamed Hendawi
- Aurora Cancer Center, Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Emily Hsu
- Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Clara Hwang
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Roman Jandarov
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | - Monika Joshi
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Hina Khan
- Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Shaheer A Khan
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Natalie Knox
- Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- UCSF, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | | | - Daniel H Kwon
- UCSF, Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | - Sara Matar
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston
| | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, UCSD, San Diego, California
| | - Sanjay Mishra
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Feras A Moria
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Nora L Nock
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Justin Panasci
- Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Yuan J Rao
- George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | | | | | - Jacob J Ripp
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Andrea V Rivera
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Andrew L Schmidt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Gary K Schwartz
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | - Justin Shaya
- Moores Cancer Center, UCSD, San Diego, California
| | - Suki Subbiah
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, LSU, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Lisa M Tachiki
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhuoer Xie
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Michael A Thompson
- Aurora Cancer Center, Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.,Tempus Labs, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Dimpy P Shah
- Mays Cancer Center, UT Health, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Yu Shyr
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Trisha M Wise-Draper
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Omar Butt
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ang Li
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Lau
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | - Kyu Park
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ting Bao
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ji Park
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Erin Cook
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | - Susie Lau
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anup Kasi
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Li C Liu
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chris Su
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tan Ding
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sara Saif
- for the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Matanes E, Amajoud Z, Kogan L, Mitric C, Ismail S, Raban O, Knigin D, Levin G, Bahoric B, Ferenczy A, Pelmus M, Lecavalier-Barsoum M, Lau S, Salvador S, Gotlieb WH. Is sentinel lymph node assessment useful in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia? Gynecol Oncol 2023; 168:107-113. [PMID: 36423445 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of underlying high-intermediate (high-IM) and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and to assess the impact of the information retrieved from the sentinel lymph node (SLN) on adjuvant therapy. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of women undergoing hysterectomy, optional bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and lymph nodes assessment for EIN between December 2007 and August 2021. RESULTS One hundred and sixty two (162) eligible patients were included, of whom 101 (62.3%) had a final diagnosis of EIN, while 61 (37.7%) were ultimately diagnosed with carcinoma. Out of 15 patients with high-IM to high-risk disease (9.25% of all EIN), 12 had grade 2-3 EC including 8 with >50% myometrial invasion, 2 with serous subtype, 1 with cervical invasion and 2 with pelvic lymph nodes involvement. Of the 3 patients with grade 1 EC, one patient had disease involving the adnexa and 2 patients had tumor invading >50% of the myometrium and with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Ten patients received vaginal brachytherapy after surgery, 3 patients with extrauterine spread were treated with systemic chemotherapy followed by vaginal brachytherapy and pelvic external-beam radiotherapy and 2 patients with early-stage serous carcinoma received chemotherapy followed by vaginal brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS Information from SLN, even when negative, can be helpful in the management of patients with EC after preoperative EIN, as some patients are found to have high-IM to high-risk disease on final pathology. These patients would require either re-staging surgery or adjuvant external beam radiotherapy, both could be avoided by proper staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad Matanes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Medical Center, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Zainab Amajoud
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Liron Kogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Cristina Mitric
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sara Ismail
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Oded Raban
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Knigin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gabriel Levin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Boris Bahoric
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alex Ferenczy
- Department of Pathology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Manuela Pelmus
- Department of Pathology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Magali Lecavalier-Barsoum
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sedlin E, Lau S, von Bernuth H, Kallinich T, Mayer B. Hemolytic anemia following intravenous immunoglobulins in children with PIMS-TS: Two case reports. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1144914. [PMID: 37114004 PMCID: PMC10126396 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1144914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This is the first case report on two children presenting with immediate and severe hemolytic anemia following the administration of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) in the context of pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS). Hemolytic anemia was described as a significant decrease in hemoglobin and an increase in lactate dehydrogenase after the second administration of high-dose IVIGs was performed. Both patients were found to have AB blood group. One of our patients showed massive pallor, weakness, and inability to walk in association with hemolysis. However, in both cases, the anemia was self-limiting and transfusion of red blood cells was not required: both patients recovered without persistent impact. Nonetheless, we aim to draw attention to this widely unknown adverse effect of IVIG, especially in the context of PIMS-TS. We suggest determining the patient's blood group prior to high-dose IVIG infusion and replacing the second IVIG through high-dose steroids or anticytokine therapy. Using IVIGs containing lower titers of specifically anti-A or anti-B antibodies to avoid isoagglutinin-caused hemolytic anemia is desirable; however, the information is not routinely available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Sedlin
- Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Klinik für Kinder-und Jugendmedizin, Helios Klinikum, Berlin-Buch, Germany
| | - S. Lau
- Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Comprehensive Allergy Center Charité (CACC), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence: S. Lau
| | - H. von Bernuth
- Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Departmentof Immunology, Labor Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- BIH Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - T. Kallinich
- Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum (DRFZ), An Institute of the Leibniz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - B. Mayer
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gwilym BL, Pallmann P, Waldron CA, Thomas-Jones E, Milosevic S, Brookes-Howell L, Harris D, Massey I, Burton J, Stewart P, Samuel K, Jones S, Cox D, Clothier A, Edwards A, Twine CP, Bosanquet DC, Benson R, Birmpili P, Blair R, Bosanquet DC, Dattani N, Dovell G, Forsythe R, Gwilym BL, Hitchman L, Machin M, Nandhra S, Onida S, Preece R, Saratzis A, Shalhoub J, Singh A, Forget P, Gannon M, Celnik A, Duguid M, Campbell A, Duncan K, Renwick B, Moore J, Maresch M, Kamal D, Kabis M, Hatem M, Juszczak M, Dattani N, Travers H, Shalan A, Elsabbagh M, Rocha-Neves J, Pereira-Neves A, Teixeira J, Lyons O, Lim E, Hamdulay K, Makar R, Zaki S, Francis CT, Azer A, Ghatwary-Tantawy T, Elsayed K, Mittapalli D, Melvin R, Barakat H, Taylor J, Veal S, Hamid HKS, Baili E, Kastrisios G, Maltezos C, Maltezos K, Anastasiadou C, Pachi A, Skotsimara A, Saratzis A, Vijaynagar B, Lau S, Velineni R, Bright E, Montague-Johnstone E, Stewart K, King W, Karkos C, Mitka M, Papadimitriou C, Smith G, Chan E, Shalhoub J, Machin M, Agbeko AE, Amoako J, Vijay A, Roditis K, Papaioannou V, Antoniou A, Tsiantoula P, Bessias N, Papas T, Dovell G, Goodchild F, Nandhra S, Rammell J, Dawkins C, Lapolla P, Sapienza P, Brachini G, Mingoli A, Hussey K, Meldrum A, Dearie L, Nair M, Duncan A, Webb B, Klimach S, Hardy T, Guest F, Hopkins L, Contractor U, Clothier A, McBride O, Hallatt M, Forsythe R, Pang D, Tan LE, Altaf N, Wong J, Thurston B, Ash O, Popplewell M, Grewal A, Jones S, Wardle B, Twine C, Ambler G, Condie N, Lam K, Heigberg-Gibbons F, Saha P, Hayes T, Patel S, Black S, Musajee M, Choudhry A, Hammond E, Costanza M, Shaw P, Feghali A, Chawla A, Surowiec S, Encalada RZ, Benson R, Cadwallader C, Clayton P, Van Herzeele I, Geenens M, Vermeir L, Moreels N, Geers S, Jawien A, Arentewicz T, Kontopodis N, Lioudaki S, Tavlas E, Nyktari V, Oberhuber A, Ibrahim A, Neu J, Nierhoff T, Moulakakis K, Kakkos S, Nikolakopoulos K, Papadoulas S, D'Oria M, Lepidi S, Lowry D, Ooi S, Patterson B, Williams S, Elrefaey GH, Gaba KA, Williams GF, Rodriguez DU, Khashram M, Gormley S, Hart O, Suthers E, French S. Short-term risk prediction after major lower limb amputation: PERCEIVE study. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1300-1311. [PMID: 36065602 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The accuracy with which healthcare professionals (HCPs) and risk prediction tools predict outcomes after major lower limb amputation (MLLA) is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of predicting short-term (30 days after MLLA) mortality, morbidity, and revisional surgery. METHODS The PERCEIVE (PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcomE following major lower limb amputation: a collaboratIVE) study was launched on 1 October 2020. It was an international multicentre study, including adults undergoing MLLA for complications of peripheral arterial disease and/or diabetes. Preoperative predictions of 30-day mortality, morbidity, and MLLA revision by surgeons and anaesthetists were recorded. Probabilities from relevant risk prediction tools were calculated. Evaluation of accuracy included measures of discrimination, calibration, and overall performance. RESULTS Some 537 patients were included. HCPs had acceptable discrimination in predicting mortality (931 predictions; C-statistic 0.758) and MLLA revision (565 predictions; C-statistic 0.756), but were poor at predicting morbidity (980 predictions; C-statistic 0.616). They overpredicted the risk of all outcomes. All except three risk prediction tools had worse discrimination than HCPs for predicting mortality (C-statistics 0.789, 0.774, and 0.773); two of these significantly overestimated the risk compared with HCPs. SORT version 2 (the only tool incorporating HCP predictions) demonstrated better calibration and overall performance (Brier score 0.082) than HCPs. Tools predicting morbidity and MLLA revision had poor discrimination (C-statistics 0.520 and 0.679). CONCLUSION Clinicians predicted mortality and MLLA revision well, but predicted morbidity poorly. They overestimated the risk of mortality, morbidity, and MLLA revision. Most short-term risk prediction tools had poorer discrimination or calibration than HCPs. The best method of predicting mortality was a statistical tool that incorporated HCP estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenig L Gwilym
- South East Wales Vascular Network, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Debbie Harris
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ian Massey
- Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre, Rookwood Hospital, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jo Burton
- Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre, Rookwood Hospital, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Phillippa Stewart
- Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre, Rookwood Hospital, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Katie Samuel
- Department of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian Jones
- c/o INVOLVE Health and Care Research Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - David Cox
- c/o INVOLVE Health and Care Research Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Annie Clothier
- South East Wales Vascular Network, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Christopher P Twine
- Bristol, Bath and Weston Vascular Network, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - David C Bosanquet
- South East Wales Vascular Network, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lau S, Wiedmann M, Adalja A. Consumer perceptions of QR code technology for enhanced fluid milk shelf-life information provision in a retail setting. JDS Commun 2022; 3:393-397. [PMID: 36465502 PMCID: PMC9709604 DOI: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
There is increasing awareness of the impact of food waste and the large role best-by or sell-by dates play in consumer food waste. To address this issue, predictive models have been developed that can not only provide more accurate best-by dates for fluid milk but could also be used to dynamically predict shelf-life (e.g., based on distribution data such as storage temperatures) and adjust prices for products closer to the end of shelf-life. However, limited information is available on strategies to communicate this type of information to consumers. Here we assessed the consumer acceptance of (1) quick response (QR) code technology to communicate product shelf-life and (2) shelf-life dependent pricing based on QR codes by offering both half-gallon fluid milk with traditional printed best-by dates and identical products with QR codes to convey best-by dates over an 8-wk time period in a retail setting. Overall, 62% of half-gallon containers sold over this time frame featured QR codes and 48% of QR code scans were linked to subsequent sales, suggesting the possibility of substantial consumer acceptance of novel technologies to display and communicate best-by dates. Preliminary data based on a small number of sales also showed that consumers did purchase QR code-labeled products offered at a reduced price due to limited remaining shelf-life. Our data suggest that at least some consumer segments would adopt QR code-based shelf-life labels, which presents an opportunity to better manage and communicate "best-by" dates and use dynamic pricing strategies to reduce food waste that occurs when an end-of-shelf-life product is either not sold or is discarded by consumers. Overall, QR codes represent a strategic opportunity for the dairy industry to achieve greater sustainability and to foster stronger connections with customers through enhanced provision of information that highlights sustainability practices implemented across the whole supply chain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Lau
- Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - M. Wiedmann
- Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - A. Adalja
- Nolan School of Hotel Administration, SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sacher A, Lau S, Allen M, Corke L, Makarem M, Chen E, Jang RJ, Elimova E, Grant R, Shepherd F, Bradbury P, Eng L, Rogalla P, Liu G, Tsao MS, Leighl N, Garonce-Hediger R, Wang B, Ohashi P, Knox J. 1202TiP Evolution of the tumor immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with liver metastases treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (INTEGRATE). Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
22
|
Lau S, Makarem M, Cabanero M, Tsao MS, Bradbury P, Shepherd F, Liu G, Leighl N, Sacher A. 1058P Non-smokers with squamous lung cancers have a high incidence of HHV infections, DDR gene alterations and good prognosis. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
23
|
Dinges SS, Coordes A, Zabaneh SI, Naumann W, Friedrich V, Hanitsch LG, Grund D, Mall MA, Lau S, Dommerich S, von Bernuth H. In severe juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis of a
10-year-old, systemic bevacizumab is highly effective and well
tolerated. Klinische Pädiatrie 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1754462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- SS Dinges
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Berlin,
Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin Institute
of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin,
Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin,
Germany
| | - A Coordes
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - SI Zabaneh
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - W Naumann
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Berlin,
Germany
| | - V Friedrich
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin Institute
of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Neonatology, Berlin, Germany
| | - LG Hanitsch
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Institute of
Medical Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - D Grund
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - MA Mall
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Berlin,
Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin Institute
of Health, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Berlin, Germany
| | - S Lau
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Berlin,
Germany
| | - S Dommerich
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - H von Bernuth
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Department of
Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Berlin,
Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin Institute
of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin,
Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Berlin,
Germany
- Labor Berlin GmbH, Department of Immunology, Berlin,
Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jamieson A, Leung S, Thompson E, Lum A, Kinloch M, Helpman L, Salvador S, Vicus D, Kean S, Samouelian V, Grondin K, Offman S, Parra-Herran C, Lau S, Scott S, Plante M, Huvila J, Huntsman D, Talhouk A, Kommoss S, Gilks B, McAlpine J. Molecular subtype stratified response to adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer (086). Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)01311-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
25
|
Matanes E, Eisenberg N, Mitric C, Yasmeen A, Ismail S, Raban O, Cantor T, Knigin D, Lau S, Salvador S, Gotlieb W, Kogan L. Surgical and oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph node sampling in elderly patients with intermediate to high-risk endometrial carcinoma (547). Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)01768-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
26
|
Piedimonte S, Feigenberg T, Drysdale E, Kwon J, Gotlieb WH, Cormier B, Plante M, Lau S, Helpman L, Renaud MC, May T, Vicus D. Predicting recurrence and recurrence-free survival in high-grade endometrial cancer using machine learning. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:1096-1103. [PMID: 35819161 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop machine-learning models to predict recurrence and time-to-recurrence in high-grade endometrial cancer (HGEC) following surgery and tailored adjuvant treatment. METHODS Data were retrospectively collected across eight Canadian centers including 1237 patients. Four models were trained to predict recurrence: random forests, boosted trees, and two neural networks. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to select the best model based on the highest area under the curve (AUC). For time to recurrence, we compared random forests and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) model to Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS The random forest was the best model to predict recurrence in HGEC; the AUCs were 85.2%, 74.1%, and 71.8% in the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The top five predictors were: stage, uterus height, specimen weight, adjuvant chemotherapy, and preoperative histology. Performance increased to 77% and 80% when stratified by Stage III and IV, respectively. For time to recurrence, there was no difference between the LASSO and Cox proportional hazards models (c-index 71%). The random forest had a c-index of 60.5%. CONCLUSIONS A bootstrap random forest model may be a more accurate technique to predict recurrence in HGEC using multiple clinicopathologic factors. For time to recurrence, machine-learning methods performed similarly to the Cox proportional hazards model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Piedimonte
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Erik Drysdale
- Genetics and Genome Biology, AI in Medicine, SickKids, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janice Kwon
- Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Beatrice Cormier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie Plante
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Taymaa May
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Matanes E, Eisenberg N, Mitric C, Yasmeen A, Ismail S, Raban O, Cantor T, Knigin D, Lau S, Salvador S, Gotlieb W, Kogan L. Surgical and oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph node sampling in elderly patients with intermediate to high-risk endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:875-881. [PMID: 35680137 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of elderly patients with intermediate to high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing staging with sentinel lymph node (SLN) sampling and pelvic lymphadenectomy. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of elderly (>65-year-old) patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer between December 2007 and August 2017. These patients had been treated at a single center in Montreal, Canada. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes of three cohorts undergoing surgical staging in non-overlapping eras: 1) lymphadenectomy, 2) lymphadenectomy and SLN sampling, 3) SLN sampling alone. Using life tables, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests, we analyzed 2-year progression-free survival, overall survival, and disease-specific survival. RESULTS Our study included 278 patients with a median age of 73 years (range; 65-91): 84 (30.2%) underwent lymphadenectomy, 120 (43.2%) underwent SLN sampling with lymphadenectomy, and 74 (26.6%) had SLN sampling alone. The SLN sampling alone group had shorter operative times with a median duration of 199 minutes (range, 75-393) compared with 231 (range, 125-403) and 229 (range, 151-440) minutes in the SLN sampling with lymphadenectomy and lymphadenectomy cohorts; respectively (p<0.001). The SLN sampling alone group also had lower estimated blood loss with a median loss of 20 mL (range, 5-150) vs 25 mL (range, 5-800) and 40 mL (range, 5-400) in the SLN sampling with lymphadenectomy and lymphadenectomy cohorts, respectively (p=0.002). The 2 year overall survival and progression-free survival were not significantly different between the three groups (p=0.45, p=0.51, respectively). On multivariable analysis after adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, stage, grade, and lymphovascular space invasion, adding SLN sampling was associated with better overall survival, (HR 0.2, CI [0.1 to 0.6], p=0.006) and progression-free survival (HR 0.5, CI [0.1 to 1.0], p=0.05). CONCLUSION Sentinel lymph node-based surgical staging is feasible and associated with better surgical outcomes and comparable oncological outcomes in elderly patients with intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad Matanes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada .,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Neta Eisenberg
- Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center Assaf Harofeh, Zerifin, Center, Israel
| | - Cristina Mitric
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Amber Yasmeen
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sara Ismail
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Oded Raban
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tal Cantor
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Knigin
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Walter Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Liron Kogan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mitric C, Lakabi R, Kligun G, Matanes E, Lau S, Gotlieb W, Salvador S. Adequacy of Endocervical Sampling Using Brush versus Curette: A Single Centre Experience. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.02.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
29
|
Piedimonte S, Pond GR, Plante M, Nelson G, Kwon J, Altman A, Feigenberg T, Elit L, Lau S, Sabourin J, Willows K, Aubrey C, Jang JH, Teo-Fortin LA, Cockburn N, Saunders NB, Shamiya S, Helpman L, Vicus D. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:230-235. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
30
|
Matanes E, Amajoud Z, Salvador S, Lau S, Gotlieb W. Four protective maneuvers in minimal invasive surgery of endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:953-954. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
31
|
Lau S, Gossen M, Lendlein A, Jung F. Differential sensitivity of assays for determining vein endothelial cell senescence. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2022; 81:191-203. [PMID: 35275526 DOI: 10.3233/ch-211294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
In vivo endothelialization of polymer-based cardiovascular implant materials is a promising strategy to reduce the risk of platelet adherence and the subsequent thrombus formation and implant failure. However, endothelial cells from elderly patients are likely to exhibit a senescent phenotype that may counteract endothelialization. The senescence status of cells should therefore be investigated prior to implantation of devices designed to be integrated in the blood vessel wall. Here, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were cultivated up to passage (P) 4, 10 and 26/27 to determine the population doubling time and the senescence status by four different methods. Determination of the senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity (SA-β-Gal) was carried out by colorimetric staining and microscopy (i), as well as by photometric quantification (ii), and the expression of senescence-associated nuclear proteins p16 and p21 as well as the proliferation marker Ki67 was assessed by immunostaining (iii), and by flow cytometry (iv). The population doubling time of P27-cells was remarkably greater (103±65 h) compared to P4-cells (24±3 h) and P10-cell (37±15 h). Among the four different methods tested, the photometric SA-β-Gal activity assay and the flow cytometric determination of p16 and Ki67 were most effective in discriminating P27-cells from P4- and P10-cells. These methods combined with functional endothelial cell analyses might aid predictions on the performance of implant endothelialization in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lau
- Institute of Active Polymers and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Teltow, Germany
| | - M Gossen
- Institute of Active Polymers and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Teltow, Germany
| | - A Lendlein
- Institute of Active Polymers and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Teltow, Germany.,Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - F Jung
- Institute of Active Polymers and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Teltow, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Helms F, Bobylev D, Wilhelmi M, Lau S, Mlinaric M, Petená E, Hassel T, Haverich A, Horke A, Böer U. A Regenerative Cardiac Patch Based on a Pressure-Compacted and Spider Silk Reinforced Fibrin Matrix. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F. Helms
- Lower Saxony Center for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - D. Bobylev
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - M. Wilhelmi
- Department of Vascular- and Endovascular Surgery, St. Bernward Hospital, Hildesheim, Deutschland
| | - S. Lau
- Lower Saxony Center for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - M. Mlinaric
- Institute for Materials Science, University of Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - E. Petená
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - T. Hassel
- Institute for Materials Science, University of Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - A. Haverich
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - A. Horke
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - U. Böer
- Lower Saxony Center for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development, Hannover, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lau S, Trmcic A, Martin NH, Wiedmann M, Murphy SI. Development of a Monte Carlo simulation model to predict pasteurized fluid milk spoilage due to post-pasteurization contamination with gram-negative bacteria. J Dairy Sci 2021; 105:1978-1998. [PMID: 34955281 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Psychrotolerant gram-negative bacteria introduced as post-pasteurization contamination (PPC) are a major cause of spoilage and reduced shelf life of high-temperature, short-time pasteurized fluid milk. To provide improved tools to (1) predict pasteurized fluid milk shelf life as influenced by PPC and (2) assess the effectiveness of different potential interventions that could reduce spoilage due to PPC, we developed a Monte Carlo simulation model that predicts fluid milk spoilage due to psychrotolerant gram-negative bacteria introduced as PPC. As a first step, 17 gram-negative bacterial isolates frequently associated with fluid milk spoilage were selected and used to generate growth data in skim milk broth at 6°C. The resulting growth parameters, frequency of isolation for the 17 different isolates, and initial concentration of bacteria in milk with PPC, were used to develop a Monte Carlo model to predict bacterial number at different days of shelf life based on storage temperature of milk. This model was then validated with data from d 7 and 10 of shelf life, collected from commercial operations. The validated model predicted that the parameters (1) maximum growth rate and (2) storage temperature had the greatest influence on the percentage of containers exceeding 20,000 cfu/mL standard plate count on d 7 and 10 (i.e., spoiling due to PPC), which indicates that accurate data on maximum growth rate and storage temperature are important for accurate predictions. In addition to allowing for prediction of fluid milk shelf life, the model allows for simulation of "what-if" scenarios, which allowed us to predict the effectiveness of different interventions to reduce overall fluid milk spoilage due to PPC through a set of proof-of-concept scenario (e.g., frequency of PPC in containers reduced from 100% to 10%; limiting distribution temperature to a maximum of 6°C). Combined with other models, such as previous models on fluid milk spoilage due to psychrotolerant spore-forming bacteria, the data and tools developed here will allow for rational, digitally enabled, fluid milk shelf life prediction and quality enhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lau
- Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - A Trmcic
- Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - N H Martin
- Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - M Wiedmann
- Milk Quality Improvement Program, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - S I Murphy
- Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kosa SD, Ferguson SE, Panzarella T, Lau S, Abitbol J, Samouëlian V, Giede C, Steed H, Renkosinski B, Gien LT, Bernardini MQ. A prospective comparison of costs between robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in endometrial cancer among women with Class III obesity or higher. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:747-753. [PMID: 34904716 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To compare the immediate operating room (OR), inpatient, and overall costs between three surgical modalities among women with endometrial cancer (EC) and Class III obesity or higher. METHODS A multicentre prospective observational study examined outcomes of women, with early stage EC, treated surgically. Resource use was collected for OR costs including OR time, equipment, and inpatient costs. Median OR, inpatient, and overall costs across surgical modalities were analyzed using an Independent-Samples Kruskal-Wallis Test among patients with BMI ≥ 40. RESULTS Out of 520 women, 103 had a BMI ≥ 40. Among women with BMI ≥ 40: median OR costs were $4197.02 for laparotomy, $5524.63 for non-robotic assisted laparoscopy, and $7225.16 for robotic-assisted laparoscopy (p < 0.001) and median inpatient costs were $5584.28 for laparotomy, $3042.07 for non-robotic assisted laparoscopy, and $1794.51 for robotic-assisted laparoscopy (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the median overall costs: $10 291.50 for laparotomy, $8412.63 for non-robotic assisted laparoscopy, and $9002.48 for robotic-assisted laparoscopy (p = 0.185). CONCLUSION There was no difference in overall costs between the three surgical modalities in patient with BMI ≥ 40. Given the similar costs, any form of minimally invasive surgery should be promoted in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah D Kosa
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impacts, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tony Panzarella
- Division of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jeremie Abitbol
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Vanessa Samouëlian
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, CHUM-Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Christopher Giede
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Benjamin Renkosinski
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian T Gien
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Matanes E, López-Ozuna VM, Octeau D, Baloch T, Racovitan F, Dhillon AK, Kessous R, Raban O, Kogan L, Salvador S, Lau S, Gotlieb WH, Yasmeen A. Inhibition of Poly ADP-Ribose Glycohydrolase Sensitizes Ovarian Cancer Cells to Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors and Platinum Agents. Front Oncol 2021; 11:745981. [PMID: 34778062 PMCID: PMC8578901 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.745981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Poly ADP-ribose glycohydrolase (PARG) is responsible for the catabolism of PARP-synthesized PAR to free ADP-ribose. Inhibition of PARG leads to DNA repair interruption and consequently induces cell death. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a PARG inhibitor (PARGi) on epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) cell lines, alone and in combination with a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) and/or Cisplatin. Methods PARG mRNA levels were studied in three different OC datasets: TCGA, Hendrix, and Meyniel. PARG protein levels were assessed in 100 OC specimens from our bio-bank. The therapeutic efficacy of PARGi was assessed using cell migration and clonogenic formation assays. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the cell apoptosis rate and the changes in the cell cycle. Results PARG protein was highly expressed in 34% of the OC tumors and low expression was found in another 9%. Similarly, Hendrix, Meyneil and TCGA databases showed a significant up-regulation in PARG mRNA expression in OC samples as compared to normal tissue (P=0.001, P=0.005, P=0.005, respectively). The use of PARGi leads to decreased cell migration. PARGi in combination with PARPi or Cisplatin induced decreased survival of cells as compared to each drug alone. In the presence of PARPi and Cisplatin, PARG knockdown cell lines showed significant G2/M cell cycle arrest and cell death induction. Conclusions PARG inhibition appears as a complementary strategy to PARP inhibition in the treatment of ovarian cancer, especially in the presence of homologous recombination defects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad Matanes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Vanessa M López-Ozuna
- Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David Octeau
- Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tahira Baloch
- Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Florentin Racovitan
- Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amandeep Kaur Dhillon
- Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Roy Kessous
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Oded Raban
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liron Kogan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amber Yasmeen
- Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gomolin A, Gotlieb W, Lau S, Salvador S, Racovitan F, Abitbol J. Mandate to evaluate robotic surgery implementation: a 12-year retrospective analysis of impact and future implications. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:783-788. [PMID: 34741713 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01327-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of robotic surgery in hospitals has raised much debate given the various effects on care, costs, education and medical advancement. Purchasing discussions are often approached with more questions than answers and there is a need for reports that provide a case for whether or not such technologies are advantageous from multiple perspectives, and offer insights into ways such devices can be introduced into a hospital setting. This report provides an evidence-based review of a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital's 12-year experience with robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology and delves into the various takeaways and challenges of implementing robotic surgery. Key findings were that robotic surgery significantly reduced complication rates, lengths of hospital stays for patients and overall hospital costs. Key obstacles were large upfront costs and the need for significant leadership and collaboration. Ongoing challenges to evaluating robotics include assessing long-term survival data, making comparisons with concurrently changing hospital conditions and determining how data can be generalized to other departments and institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arieh Gomolin
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Walter Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Florentin Racovitan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Jeremie Abitbol
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Cote Ste. Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.,Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lau S, MacLeod C, Vesey A, Lau PF, Ghibu P. 1529 Management of A Rare Case of Bilateral Persistent Sciatic Artery Aneurysms Causing Critical Limb Ischaemia With Staged Embolisation And Femoropopliteal Bypass: A Case Report. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab259.387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Bilateral persistent sciatic arteries (PSA) are rare with an incidence of 0.001%. They represent a persistence of the embryonic axial limb circulation via the internal iliac artery. Normally the PSA involutes and is replaced by the superficial femoral artery (SFA). Failure of regression leads to a PSA with varying configurations. Up to 50% of PSAs are aneurysmal and may present with rupture or acute/chronic ischaemia, typically at 40-50 years old.
Case Report
A 74-year-old female presented with limb threatening ischaemia manifesting with rest pain, sensory deficit and early tissue loss (Rutherford IIb). She had a left femoral pulse but absent pulses distally. Pedal pulses were noted on the contralateral limb. CT angiogram revealed bilateral complete PSAs with incomplete hypoplastic SFAs (Pillet-Gauffre 2a). Both PSAs were aneurysmal; the left PSA was acutely occluded distal to the aneurysm. She underwent staged intervention with percutaneous embolisation of the left PSA, followed by femoropopliteal bypass. She was discharged six days later with good symptomatic relief at one month follow up. We are planning to treat the contralateral limb in a similar manner electively in case complications occur.
Conclusions
PSAs are commonly associated with limb threatening complications but due to their rarity there are limited reports on the management of this condition. Here we can report a good outcome in a late presentation using staged embolisation with open reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lau
- NHS Lanarkshire, East Kilbride, United Kingdom
| | - C MacLeod
- NHS Lanarkshire, East Kilbride, United Kingdom
| | - A Vesey
- NHS Lanarkshire, East Kilbride, United Kingdom
| | - P F Lau
- NHS Lanarkshire, East Kilbride, United Kingdom
| | - P Ghibu
- NHS Lanarkshire, East Kilbride, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lau S, Rabindranath M, Weiss J, Li J, Nirmalakumar S, Ruff H, Boerner S, Tong L, Tsao M, Pal P, Cabanero M, Hsu Y, Fung A, Sacher A, Shepherd F, Liu G, Bradbury P, Yasufuku K, Czarnecka-Kujawa K, Ko H, Leighl N, Schwock J. FP12.01 PD-L1 Assessment in Cytology is Comparable to Histology in Predicting Treatment Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.08.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
39
|
Lau S, Perdrizet K, Giffoni M.M. Mata D, Fung A, Liu G, Bradbury P, Shepherd F, Sacher A, Sheffield B, Hwang D, Tsao M, Cheng S, Cheema P, Leighl N. P45.05 Sequencing of PD-1 Inhibitors and TKIs in Metastatic NSCLC with MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation May Influence Survival. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.08.473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
40
|
Matanes E, Cantor T, AlShehri E, Salvador S, Lau S, Gotlieb W. Surgical technique for sentinel lymph node sampling in endometrial cancer using the articulated HOOK monopolar instrument. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 32:951-952. [PMID: 34493585 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emad Matanes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada .,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tal Cantor
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Eman AlShehri
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Walter Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kiefel H, Haria D, Ravichandar J, Desnoyer J, Guagua J, Lau S, Lee J, Rutherford E, Dabbagh K, Lal P. 1023P A novel microbiome-derived peptide, SG-3-00802 reverses resistance to anti-programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
42
|
Ory J, Tradewell M, Lima T, Blankstein U, Madhusoodanan V, Moryousef J, Lau S, Jarvi K, Ramasamy R. P–016 Using artificial intelligence to predict semen upgrading after microsurgical varicocele repair. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Can we use artificial intelligence models to predict semen upgrading after microsurgical varicocele repair?
Summary answer
A machine learning model performed well in predicting clinically meaningful post-varicocelectomy semen upgrade using pre-operative hormonal, clinical, and semen analysis data.
What is known already
Varicocele repair is recommended in the presence of a clinical varicocele together with at least one abnormal semen parameter, and male infertility. Unfortunately, up to 50% of men who meet criteria for repair will not see meaningful benefit in outcomes despite successful surgery. Nomograms exist to help predict success, but these are based out of single-center databases, do not incorporate hormonal data, and are rarely designed to predict pre-defined, clinically meaningful improvements in semen parameters.
Study design, size, duration
Data were collected from an international, multi-center retrospective cohort. A total of 240 men were identified. Data from 160 men from Miami, USA and 80 men from Toronto, Canada were included. Data was collected from 2006 to 2020.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
We collected pre and postoperative clinical data following varicocele surgery. Clinical upgrading was defined as an increase in sperm concentration that would allow a couple to access new reproductive technologies/techniques. The tiers used for upgrading were 0–1million/cc (Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection), 1–5 million (In Vitro Fertilization), 5–15 million (Intrauterine Insemination), and >15 million (Natural conception). Artificial intelligence models were trained and tested using R to predict which patients upgraded after surgery.
Main results and the role of chance
51% of men underwent bilateral varicocele repair. The majority of men had grade 2 varicocele on the left, and (when present) a grade 1 varicocele on the right. Overall, 47% of men experienced an upgrade following varicocele surgery, 47% did not change, and 6% downgraded. The data from Miami were used to create a random forest model for predicting clinically significant upgrade in sperm concentration. The most informative model parameters were preoperative FSH, sperm concentration, and surgical laterality. The model identified three clinical categories: men with unfavorable, intermediate, and favorable features to predict varicocele upgrade. On external validation using data from Toronto, the model accurately predicted upgrade in 87% of men with favorable features, and in 49% and 36% of men with intermediate and unfavorable features, respectively. Overall, the model performed well on external validation with an AUC of 0.72 and good calibration.
Calibration plots, using cross-validation, define how well the predicted probabilities match the actual probability of sperm concentration upgrade. The random forest model was run twelve times. All model characteristics are the mean of ten model runs with the highest and lowest performing runs removed.
The model was translated to an online calculator that can be used by clinicians.
Limitations, reasons for caution
One limitation to our study is that we were not able to predict total motile sperm count (TMSC), which has been shown to perform slightly better than concentration at predicting assisted reproduction outcomes. By focusing on clinically significant upgrading, this difference should be minimized.
Wider implications of the findings: Predicting the chances of clinically significant semen upgrading after varicocele repair is essential for patients and clinicians to understand. Several men undergo surgery with no subsequent benefit, which may lead to a delay in definitive treatment with IVF/IUI. Understanding their chances will help couples make better informed decisions moving forward.
Trial registration number
Not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ory
- University of Miami, Department of Urology, Miami, USA
| | - M Tradewell
- University of Miami, Department of Urology, Miami, USA
| | - T Lima
- University of Miami, Department of Urology, Miami, USA
| | - U Blankstein
- University of Toronto, Department of Surgery- Division of Urology, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - J Moryousef
- McGill University, Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada
| | - S Lau
- University of Toronto, Department of Surgery- Division of Urology, Toronto, Canada
| | - K Jarvi
- University of Toronto, Department of Surgery- Division of Urology, Toronto, Canada
| | - R Ramasamy
- University of Miami, Department of Urology, Miami, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Matanes E, Lau S, Volodarsky-Perel A, Eisenberg N, Mitric C, Salvador S, Gotlieb W, Kogan L. Endometrial cancer in germline BRCA mutation carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(21)00923-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
44
|
Matanes E, Eisenberg N, Lau S, Gotlieb W, Salvador S, Kogan L. Omitting lymphadenectomy in obese endometrial cancer patients undergoing sentinel lymph node mapping: when more is less. Gynecol Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(21)01066-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
45
|
López-Ozuna VM, Kogan L, Hachim MY, Matanes E, Hachim IY, Mitric C, Kiow LLC, Lau S, Salvador S, Yasmeen A, Gotlieb WH. Identification of Predictive Biomarkers for Lymph Node Involvement in Obese Women With Endometrial Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:695404. [PMID: 34307159 PMCID: PMC8292832 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.695404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Obesity, an established risk factor for endometrial cancer (EC), is also associated to increased risks of intraoperative and postoperative complications. A reliable tool to identify patients at low risk for lymph node (LN) metastasis may allow minimizing the surgical staging and omit lymphadenectomy in obese patients. To identify molecular biomarkers that could predict LN involvement in obese patients with EC we performed gene expression analysis in 549 EC patients using publicly available transcriptomic datasets. Patients were filtrated according to cancer subtype, weight (>30 kg/m2) and LN status. While in the LN+ group, NEB, ANK1, AMIGO2, LZTS1, FKBP5, CHGA, USP32P1, CLIC6, CEMIP, HMCN1 and TNFRSF10C genes were highly expressed; in the LN- group CXCL14, FCN1, EPHX3, DDX11L2, TMEM254, RNF207, LTK, RPL36A, HGAL, B4GALNT4, KLRG1 genes were up-regulated. As a second step, we investigated these genes in our patient cohort of 35 patients (15 LN+ and 20 LN-) and found the same correlation with the in-silico analysis. In addition, immunohistochemical expression was confirmed in the tumor tissue. Altogether, our findings propose a novel panel of genes able to predict LN involvement in obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa M López-Ozuna
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liron Kogan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center, affiliated with Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Mahmood Y Hachim
- College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Emad Matanes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ibrahim Y Hachim
- College of Medicine, Sharjah Institute for Medical Research, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Cristina Mitric
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lauren Liu Chen Kiow
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amber Yasmeen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Feigenberg T, Cormier B, Gotlieb WH, Jegatheeswaran K, Helpman L, Kim SR, Lau S, May T, Saab D, Plante M, Renaud MC, Samouelian V, Shamiya S, Vicus D, Wright K, Kwon JS. Factors associated with an increased risk of recurrence in patients diagnosed with high-grade endometrial cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery: A study of the society of gynecologic oncology of Canada (GOC) community of practice (CoP). Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:606-612. [PMID: 34183164 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a standard surgical approach for comprehensive surgical staging in women with endometrial cancer. As rates and complexity of MIS are steadily increasing, it is important to identify potential risk factors which may be associated with this approach. This study evaluates the impact of local factors on the risk of disease recurrence. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients diagnosed with high grade endometrial cancer (HGEC) who underwent MIS between 2012 and 2016 at eight Canadian centers. Data was collected from medical records. The 75th percentile was calculated for estimated uterine volume and weight. All recurrences were categorized into two groups; intra-abdominal vs. extra-abdominal. To search for significant covariates associated with recurrence-free survival a Cox proportional hazard model was performed. RESULTS A total of 758 patients were included in the study. Intra-uterine manipulator was used in 497 (35.8%) of patients. Vaginal lacerations were documented in 9.1%. Median follow-up was 30.5 months (interquartile range 20-47). There were 157 who had disease recurrence (20.71%), including 92 (12.14%) intra-abdominal and 60 (7.92%) extra-abdominal only recurrences. In univariate analysis myometrial invasion, LVI, stage, uterine volume and weight > 75th percentile and chemotherapy were associated with increased risk of intra-abdominal recurrence. In multivariable analysis only stage, and specimen weight > 75th percentile (OR 2.207, CI 1.123-4.337) remained significant. Uterine volume, and weight were not associated with increased risk of extra-abdominal recurrences. CONCLUSION For patients diagnosed with HGEC undergoing MIS, extracting a large uterus is associated with a significantly increased risk for intra-abdominal recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomer Feigenberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Trillium Health Partners, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Beatrice Cormier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Walter Henri Gotlieb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kizanee Jegatheeswaran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Limor Helpman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Soyoun Rachel Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Susie Lau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Taymaa May
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dima Saab
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marie Plante
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Hôtel-Dieu de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie Claude Renaud
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Hôtel-Dieu de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Vanessa Samouelian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Université de Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sarah Shamiya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Vicus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristin Wright
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janice S Kwon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Matanes E, Eisenberg N, Lau S, Salvador S, Ferenczy A, Pelmus M, Gotlieb WH, Kogan L. Absence of prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in patients with endometrial cancer and negative sentinel lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:256-261. [PMID: 34119364 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate if the prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is different in endometrial cancer patients with negative lymph nodes following sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping or lymph node dissection (LND) as staging procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study of 510 patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma in our institution between 2007 and 2014. We excluded patients that were diagnosed with positive nodes (Stage IIIc). We compared patients' characteristics and survival outcomes as function of their LVSI status (positive LVSI vs negative LVSI subgroups) in each cohort separately. RESULTS 413 patients met the inclusion criteria, out of whom 239 underwent SLN and 174 patients underwent LND only. In the SLN group, life table analysis showed 5-year OS and PFS of 80% and 72% in patients with LVSI compared to 96%, and 93% without LVSI. Same trend was observed among patients with LND with 5-year OS and PFS of 74% and 64% in patients with LVSI compared to 97%, and 90% without LVSI. On multivariable analysis, adjusted for age, FIGO stage, grade and maximal tumor size, the favorable survival of negative LVSI remained only in the LND cohort (SLN cohort: HR 1.2, CI [0.3-4.0], P = 0.8 and HR 1.7, CI [0.7-4.3], p = 0.2 for OS and PFS, respectively; LND cohort: HR 3.1, CI [1.4-6.5], p < 0.001 and HR 2.5, CI [1.2-4.9], p = 0.01 for OS and PFS, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The prognostic value of LVSI disappears when patients undergo staging with SLN and are found to have negative nodes in contrast to those who have undergone LND. Future studies should confirm our observation on patients with negative sentinel nodes, and plan on tailoring adjuvant treatment to this specific subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad Matanes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Neta Eisenberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alex Ferenczy
- Department of Pathology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Manuela Pelmus
- Department of Pathology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Liron Kogan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center, Affiliated with the Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Braune S, Bäckemo J, Lau S, Heuchel M, Kratz K, Jung F, Reinthaler M, Lendlein A. The influence of different rewetting procedures on the thrombogenicity of nanoporous poly(ether imide) microparticles. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2021; 77:367-380. [PMID: 33337356 DOI: 10.3233/ch-201029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Nanoporous microparticles prepared from poly(ether imide) (PEI) are discussed as candidate adsorber materials for the removal of uremic toxins during apheresis. Polymers exhibiting such porosity can induce the formation of micro-gas/air pockets when exposed to fluids. Such air presenting material surfaces are reported to induce platelet activation and thrombus formation. Physical or chemical treatments prior to implantation are discussed to reduce the formation of such gas nuclei. Here, we report about the influence of different rewetting procedures - as chemical treatments with solvents - on the thrombogenicity of hydrophobic PEI microparticles and PEI microparticles hydrophilized by covalent attachment of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) of two different chain lengths.Autoclaved dry PEI particles of all types with a diameter range of 200 - 250 μm and a porosity of about 84% ±2% were either rewetted directly with phosphate buffered saline (24 h) or after immersion in an ethanol-series. Thrombogenicity of the particles was studied in vitro upon contact with human sodium citrated whole blood for 60 min at 5 rpm vertical rotation. Numbers of non-adherent platelets were quantified, and adhesion of blood cells was qualitatively analyzed by bright field microscopy. Platelet activation (percentage of CD62P positive platelets and amounts of soluble P-Selectin) and platelet function (PFA100 closure times) were analysed.Retention of blood platelets on the particles was similar for all particle types and both rewetting procedures. Non-adherent platelets were less activated after contact with ethanol-treated particles of all types compared to those rewetted with phosphate buffered saline as assessed by a reduced number of CD62P-positive platelets and reduced amounts of secreted P-Selectin (P < 0.05 each). Interestingly, the hydrophilic surfaces significantly increased the number of activated platelets compared to hydrophobic PEI regardless of the rewetting agent. This suggests that, apart from wettability, other material properties might be more important to regulate platelet activation. PFA100 closure times were reduced and within the reference ranges in the ethanol group, however, significantly increased in the saline group. No substantial difference was detected between the tested surface modifications. In summary, rewetting with ethanol resulted in a reduced thrombogenicity of all studied microparticles regardless of their wettability, most likely resulting from the evacuation of air from the nanoporous particles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Braune
- Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany
| | - J Bäckemo
- Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany
| | - S Lau
- Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany
| | - M Heuchel
- Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany
| | - K Kratz
- Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany
| | - F Jung
- Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany
| | - M Reinthaler
- Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany.,Department for Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Lendlein
- Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany.,Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Matanes E, Eisenberg N, Amajoud Z, Gupta V, Yasmeen A, Ismail S, Racovitan F, Raban O, Lau S, Salvador S, Gotlieb WH, Kogan L. Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling as an Alternative to Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Endometrial Cancer and Obesity. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2021; 43:1136-1144.e1. [PMID: 33984524 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although its use in endometrial cancer staging is relatively new, sentinel lymph node (SLN) sampling has been shown to be highly accurate and is associated with few complications. However, some studies report lower rates of detection with SLN sampling among patients with obesity. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the feasibility of SLN sampling in endometrial cancer for patients with obesity, and to determine whether omitting lymph node dissection (LND) in surgical staging using SLN sampling impacts oncologic outcomes. METHODS we conducted a retrospective study of patients with obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2), diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma between 2007 and 2017, that compared surgical and oncologic outcomes of 2 cohorts: patients who underwent LND and patients who underwent SLN without lymphadenectomy. The primary outcome was operative time. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative bleeding; lymph node assessment information; intraoperative and postoperative adverse events; and oncologic outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). PFS was defined as the time from surgery to the recurrence or death from any cause. OS was defined as time from diagnosis to death or the last date the patient was known to be alive, and DSS was defined as the time from the surgery to death from the disease. RESULTS Out of 223 patients with a median BMI of 40.6 kg/m2, 140 underwent LND and 83 underwent SLN alone. The median operative time for patients in the SLN group was shorter than that of patients in the LND group (190.5 [range 108-393] vs. 238 [131-440] min; P < 0.001), and the SLN group had lower median estimated blood loss than the LND group (30 [range 0-300] vs. 40 [range 0-800] mL; P = 0.03). At the 24-month follow-up cut-off, 98% of patients were alive and 95.5% were disease free, with no significant differences in OS, DSS, and PFS between the 2 groups (P = 0.7, P = 0.8, and P = 0.4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In patients with obesity, omitting LND from surgical staging with SLN sampling was associated with shorter operative times and less bleeding and did not affect survival at 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad Matanes
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Québec
| | - Neta Eisenberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Zainab Amajoud
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec
| | - Vishaal Gupta
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec
| | - Amber Yasmeen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Québec
| | - Sara Ismail
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec
| | - Florentin Racovitan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec
| | - Oded Raban
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Québec
| | - Susie Lau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Québec
| | - Shannon Salvador
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Québec
| | - Walter H Gotlieb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec; Segal Cancer Center, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Québec.
| | - Liron Kogan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the Hebrew
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lau S, Kong J, Bell S, Heriot A, Stevenson A, Moloney J, Hayes J, Merrie A, Eglinton T, Guest G, Clark D, Warrier S. Transanal mesorectal excision: early outcomes in Australia and New Zealand. Br J Surg 2021; 108:214-219. [PMID: 33711138 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) aims to overcome some of the technical challenges faced when operating on mid and low rectal cancers. Specimen quality has been confirmed previously, but recent concerns have been raised about oncological safety. This multicentre prospective study aimed to evaluate the safety of taTME among early adopters in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS Data from all consecutive patients who had taTME for rectal cancer from July 2014 to February 2020 at six tertiary referral centres in Australasia were recorded and analysed. RESULTS A total of 308 patients of median age of 64 years underwent taTME. Some 75.6 per cent of patients were men, and the median BMI was 26.8 kg/m2. The median distance of tumour from anal verge was 7 cm. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was administered to 57.8 per cent of patients. The anastomotic leak rate was 8.1 per cent and there was no mortality within 30 days of surgery. Pathological examination found a complete mesorectum in 295 patients (95.8 per cent), a near-complete mesorectum in seven patients (2.3 per cent), and an incomplete mesorectum in six patients (1.9 per cent). The circumferential resection margin and distal resection margin was involved in nine patients (2.9 per cent), and two patients (0.6 per cent) respectively. Over a median follow-up of 22 months, the local recurrence rate was 1.9 per cent and median time to local recurrence was 30.5 months. CONCLUSION This study showed that, with appropriate training and supervision, skilled minimally invasive rectal cancer surgeons can perform taTME with similar pathological and oncological results to open and laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lau
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Kong
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Bell
- Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Stevenson
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - J Moloney
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - J Hayes
- Department of Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - A Merrie
- Department of Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - T Eglinton
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - G Guest
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Clark
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - S Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|