1
|
Liu ZK, Ma WX, Zhang JJ, Liu SD, Duan XL, Wang ZZ. Risk factor analysis and establishment of a predictive model for complications of elderly advanced gastric cancer with Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ II grade. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:1185. [PMID: 39333976 PMCID: PMC11437802 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12965-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The occurrence of complications following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Elderly patients are susceptible to postoperative complications. This study seeks to investigate the risk factors associated with Clavien-Dindo ≥IIgrade complications following radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients, develop a nomogram risk prediction model, and validate its accuracy. METHODS Retrospective collection of clinical and pathological data was conducted on 442 elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy at Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2020. They were randomly divided into a training set (n = 310) and a validation set (n = 132) in a 7:3 ratio. The severity of postoperative complications was graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system, resulting in two complication groups: Clavien-Dindo RESULTS Among the 442 patients included in the study, 121 cases (27.38%) experienced postoperative complications, with 111 cases (25.11%) classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥II grade complications. Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), surgical duration, age, and history of Diabetes mellitus were independent risk factors for the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo ≥IIgrade complications in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer after surgery (P < 0.05). The nomogram model constructed based on these factors demonstrated good discriminative ability, as indicated by the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Calibration plots showed that the predicted probability of gastric cancer lymph node metastasis using the nomogram model was well aligned with actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis indicated the clinical utility of the nomogram model across a wide range of thresholds, demonstrating its practicality and potential for clinical benefit. CONCLUSION This study identified Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), surgical duration, age, and history of Diabetes mellitus as risk factors for the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo ≥ II grade complications in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer after surgery. Based on these four risk factors, a nomogram risk prediction model was constructed. This model can be used to personalize the prediction of the risk of Clavien-Dindo ≥ II grade complications occurring after surgery in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe-Kui Liu
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, 256 West Youyi Road, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, China
- Department of Graduate Studies, Xi'an Medicine University, Xi'an, 710021, China
| | - Wen-Xing Ma
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, 256 West Youyi Road, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jun-Jie Zhang
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, 256 West Youyi Road, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, China
- Department of Graduate Studies, Xi'an Medicine University, Xi'an, 710021, China
| | - Si-da Liu
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, 256 West Youyi Road, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiang-Long Duan
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, 256 West Youyi Road, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, China.
- Institute of Medical Research, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Ze-Zheng Wang
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, 256 West Youyi Road, Xi'an, 710068, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang F, Zhang X, Tang L, Wu Q, Cai M, Li Y, Qu X, Qiu H, Zhang Y, Ying J, Zhang J, Sun L, Lin R, Wang C, Liu H, Qiu M, Guan W, Rao S, Ji J, Xin Y, Sheng W, Xu H, Zhou Z, Zhou A, Jin J, Yuan X, Bi F, Liu T, Liang H, Zhang Y, Li G, Liang J, Liu B, Shen L, Li J, Xu R. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2024; 44:127-172. [PMID: 38160327 PMCID: PMC10794017 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The 2023 update of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on standardizing cancer diagnosis and treatment in China, reflecting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource availability, and precision medicine. These updates address the differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biology, treatment patterns, and drug selections between Eastern and Western gastric cancer patients. Key revisions include a structured template for imaging diagnosis reports, updated standards for molecular marker testing in pathological diagnosis, and an elevated recommendation for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer. For advanced metastatic gastric cancer, the guidelines introduce new recommendations for immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy and targeted drugs, along with updated management strategies for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients. Additionally, the guidelines offer detailed screening recommendations for hereditary gastric cancer and an appendix listing drug treatment regimens for various stages of gastric cancer. The 2023 CSCO Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer updates are based on both Chinese and international clinical research and expert consensus to enhance their applicability and relevance in clinical practice, particularly in the heterogeneous healthcare landscape of China, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely revisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng‐Hua Wang
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Xiao‐Tian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal OncologyKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education)Peking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Lei Tang
- Department of RadiologyPeking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Qi Wu
- Department of Endoscopy CenterPeking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Mu‐Yan Cai
- Department of PathologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Yuan‐Fang Li
- Department of Gastric SurgerySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Xiu‐Juan Qu
- Department of Medical OncologyThe First Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangLiaoningP. R. China
| | - Hong Qiu
- Department of Medical OncologyTongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Yu‐Jing Zhang
- Department of RadiotherapySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Jie‐Er Ying
- Department of Medical OncologyZhejiang Cancer HospitalHangzhouZhejiangP. R. China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Medical OncologyRuijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Ling‐Yu Sun
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityHarbinHeilongjiangP. R. China
| | - Rong‐Bo Lin
- Department of Medical OncologyFujian Cancer HospitalFuzhouFujianP. R. China
| | - Chang Wang
- Tumor CenterThe First Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunJilinP. R. China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General SurgeryNanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Miao‐Zhen Qiu
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Wen‐Long Guan
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Sheng‐Xiang Rao
- Department of RadiologyZhongshan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Jia‐Fu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryPeking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Yan Xin
- Pathology Laboratory of Gastrointestinal TumorThe First Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangLiaoningP. R. China
| | - Wei‐Qi Sheng
- Department of PathologyZhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Fudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Hui‐Mian Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery. The First Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangLiaoningP. R. China
| | - Zhi‐Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastric SurgerySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Ai‐Ping Zhou
- Department of OncologyNational Cancer CenterNational Clinical Research Center for CancerCancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingP. R. China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation OncologyShenzhen hospitalCancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingP. R. China
| | - Xiang‐Lin Yuan
- Department of OncologyTongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Feng Bi
- Department of Abdominal OncologyWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduSichuanP. R. China
| | - Tian‐Shu Liu
- Department of Medical OncologyZhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Han Liang
- Department of Gastric SurgeryTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalTianjinP. R. China
| | - Yan‐Qiao Zhang
- Department of Medical OncologyCancer Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityHarbinHeilongjiangP. R. China
| | - Guo‐Xin Li
- Department of General SurgeryNanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Medical OncologyPeking University International HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Bao‐Rui Liu
- Department of Medical OncologyNanjing Drum Tower HospitalThe Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingP. R. China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of GI OncologyKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education)Peking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Jin Li
- Department of OncologyEaster Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Tongji UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Rui‐Hua Xu
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Díaz Del Arco C, Ortega Medina L, Estrada Muñoz L, Molina Roldán E, García Gómez de Las Heras S, Fernández Aceñero MJ. Prognostic role of the number of resected and negative lymph nodes in Spanish patients with gastric cancer. Ann Diagn Pathol 2023; 67:152209. [PMID: 37689040 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2023.152209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lymph node (LN) involvement is one of the most critical prognostic factors in resected gastric cancer (GC). Some analyses, mainly conducted in Asian populations, have found that patients with a higher number of total lymph nodes (NTLN) and/or negative lymph nodes (NNLN) have a better prognosis, although other authors have failed to confirm these results. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study including all patients with GC resected in a tertiary hospital in Spain between 2001 and 2019 (n = 315). Clinicopathological features were collected and patients were categorized according to the NTLN and the NNLN. Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS Mean NNLN was 17. The NNLN was significantly related to multiple clinicopathological variables, including recurrence and tumor-related death. The classification based on the NNLN (N1: ≥16, N2: 8-15, N3: ≤7) effectively stratified the entire cohort into three distinct prognostic groups and maintained its prognostic value within both the pN0 and pN+ patient subsets. Furthermore, it was an independent prognostic indicator for both overall and disease-free survival. Conversely, the mean NTLN was 21.9. Patients with ≤16 LN retrieved exhibited distinct clinicopathological features compared to those with >16 LN, but no significant differences were observed in terms of recurrence or disease-associated death. The application of alternative cut-off points for NTLN (10, 20, 25, 30, and 40) showed no prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS In Spanish patients with resected GC the NNLN hold prognostic significance, while the NTLN does not appear to be prognostically significant. Incorporating the NNLN into GC staging may enhance the accuracy of the TNM system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Díaz Del Arco
- Pathology Teaching Unit, Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos; Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Luis Ortega Medina
- Pathology Teaching Unit, Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos; Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lourdes Estrada Muñoz
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos University, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Rey Juan Carlos Hospital, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Molina Roldán
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos; Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain; Biobank, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - M Jesús Fernández Aceñero
- Pathology Teaching Unit, Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos; Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xiao J, Shen K, Fan H, Wang G, Liu K, Wang Y, Ma X, Ni P, Xu Z, Yang L. Prognostic Value of Tumor Size in Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on SEER Database. Int J Surg Pathol 2023; 31:1273-1282. [PMID: 36802927 DOI: 10.1177/10668969231152578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Background. Although tumor size is regarded as the "T" stage of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for many solid tumors, its prognostic impact in gastric cancer remains uncertain and conflicting. Methods. We enrolled 6960 eligible patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The X-tile program was used to select the best cut-off value of tumor size. Then, the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model were applied to examine the efficacy of tumor size on prognostic prediction for overall survival (OS) and gastric cancer-specific survival (GCSS). The presence of nonlinear association was determined by the restricted cubic spline (RCS) model. Results. Tumor size was divided into 3 groups: small size (≤2.5 cm), medium size (2.6-5.2 cm), and large size (≥5.3 cm). After adjusting by covariates such as depth of tumor infiltration, the large and medium groups showed a worse prognosis than the small group; however, no survival difference in OS was suggested between the medium and large groups. Similarly, although there was a nonlinear relationship between tumor size and survival, increasing tumor size did not show an independent negative effect on prognosis in the RCS analysis. However, the stratified analyses proposed this 3-way cut of tumor size in prognostic prediction for patients with both inadequate lymphadenectomy and negative nodal metastasis. Conclusions. Tumor size as a prognostic predictor may not have good clinical applicability in gastric cancer. Otherwise, it was recommended for patients with both insufficient examinations of lymph nodes and stage N0 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Xiao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Kuan Shen
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Hao Fan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Gang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Kanghui Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yuanhang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xiang Ma
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Peidong Ni
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Zekuan Xu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Liyang People's Hospital, Liyang Branch Hospital of Jiangsu Province Hospital, Liyang, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nie D, Zheng H, An G, Li J. Development and validation of a novel nomogram for postoperative overall survival of patients with primary gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma: a population study based on SEER database. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04796-x. [PMID: 37097391 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04796-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) is a highly malignant subtype of gastric cancer. We tried to establish and validate a nomogram using common clinical variables to achieve more personalized management. METHODS We analyzed patients with GSRCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2017. The survival curve was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference in survival curve was tested by log-rank test. We used the cox proportional hazard model to evaluate independent factors of prognosis, and established a nomogram to predict 1-, 3- and 5- overall survival (OS). Harrell's consistency index and calibration curve were used to measure the discrimination and calibration of the nomogram. In addition, we used decision curve analysis (DCA) to compare the net clinical benefits of the nomogram and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. RESULTS The prognosis nomogram predicting 1-, 3- and 5-years OS for patients with GSRCC is established for the first time. The C-index and AUC of nomogram were higher than that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in the training set. Our model also shows better performance than the AJCC staging system in the validation set, and importantly, DCA shows that our model has a better net benefit than the AJCC stage. CONCLUSIONS We have developed and validated a new nomogram and risk classification system, which is better than the AJCC staging system. It will help clinicians manage postoperative patients with GSRCC more accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duorui Nie
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Yuhua District, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, China
| | - Hao Zheng
- First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guilin An
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Yuhua District, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lei ZN, Teng QX, Tian Q, Chen W, Xie Y, Wu K, Zeng Q, Zeng L, Pan Y, Chen ZS, He Y. Signaling pathways and therapeutic interventions in gastric cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022; 7:358. [PMID: 36209270 PMCID: PMC9547882 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-022-01190-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fifth in global cancer diagnosis and fourth in cancer-related death. Despite tremendous progress in diagnosis and therapeutic strategies and significant improvements in patient survival, the low malignancy stage is relatively asymptomatic and many GC cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, which leads to unsatisfactory prognosis and high recurrence rates. With the recent advances in genome analysis, biomarkers have been identified that have clinical importance for GC diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Modern molecular classifications have uncovered the vital roles that signaling pathways, including EGFR/HER2, p53, PI3K, immune checkpoint pathways, and cell adhesion signaling molecules, play in GC tumorigenesis, progression, metastasis, and therapeutic responsiveness. These biomarkers and molecular classifications open the way for more precise diagnoses and treatments for GC patients. Nevertheless, the relative significance, temporal activation, interaction with GC risk factors, and crosstalk between these signaling pathways in GC are not well understood. Here, we review the regulatory roles of signaling pathways in GC potential biomarkers, and therapeutic targets with an emphasis on recent discoveries. Current therapies, including signaling-based and immunotherapies exploited in the past decade, and the development of treatment for GC, particularly the challenges in developing precision medications, are discussed. These advances provide a direction for the integration of clinical, molecular, and genomic profiles to improve GC diagnosis and treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Ning Lei
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA
| | - Qiu-Xu Teng
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA
| | - Qin Tian
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuhao Xie
- Institute for Biotechnology, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA
| | - Kaiming Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Qianlin Zeng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Leli Zeng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| | - Yihang Pan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| | - Zhe-Sheng Chen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA.
- Institute for Biotechnology, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA.
| | - Yulong He
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tsao MW, Kahl MS, Deneve JL, Yakoub D, Glazer ES, Shibata D, Jain R, Clark I, Dickson PV. The Association of Race With Adequate Lymph Node Evaluation for Gastric Cancer. Am Surg 2022; 88:2280-2288. [PMID: 35570820 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221101601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National studies have reported racial and socioeconomic disparities in gastric cancer (GC) care. The current study evaluated adequate lymph node (LN) assessment (≥16 LNs) during resection for GC within a healthcare system servicing a socioeconomically disparate, mostly non-White population in the Southeast United States. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing resection for GC between 2003-2019 was performed. Factors associated with adequate LN assessment including patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS Among 202 patients, adequate LN assessment was performed in 97 (48%) patients. On univariable analysis, younger age, non-White race, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Medicaid or no insurance, D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy, clinical evidence of regional LN metastases, total gastrectomy, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy were associated with adequate LN assessment. On multivariable analysis, non-White race (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.38-5.65), CCI <4 (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.15-3.96), and D1+/D2 lymphadenectomy (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.96-6.74) were the only factors independently associated with adequate LN evaluation. CONCLUSIONS In the current study, non-White race, independent of socioeconomics, was significantly associated with adequate LN assessment. Future work is necessary to improve standardization and achieve higher rates of adequate LN assessment for all patients during resection for GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam W Tsao
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 12326University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Madison S Kahl
- College of Medicine, 12326University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jeremiah L Deneve
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 12326University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Evan S Glazer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 12326University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - David Shibata
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 12326University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Richa Jain
- Department of Pathology, 5416Methodist LeBonheur Healthcare, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Ian Clark
- Department of Pathology, 5416Methodist LeBonheur Healthcare, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Paxton V Dickson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, 12326University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tao W, Cheng YX, Liu XY, Zhang B, Yuan C, Peng D, Zhang W. A Simple Predictive Index of the Abdominal Shape for Postoperative Complications After Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. Front Surg 2021; 8:768434. [PMID: 34957204 PMCID: PMC8692270 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.768434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of abdominal shape on the short-term surgical outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective study that included 425 patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy plus D2 lymph node dissection (LADG) from January 2013 to January 2021. The abdominal parameters, including the shortest distance of the pancreas from the anterior abdominal skin (PAAD), the lower sternum angle (LSA), the thickness of the subcutaneous fat at the navel level (SFT), the anteroposterior diameters (APD) and the left-right diameters (LRD) at the navel level, the distance from the xiphoid process to the navel (XND) and the distance from the xiphoid process to the pubis (XBD), were calculated by preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging. The parameters and short-term surgical outcomes were analyzed. Results: In males, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly higher in patients with a lower APD group (p = 0.031). The operation time was significantly shorter in the lower body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.007), lower LSA (p = 0.035), lower PAAD (p = 0.000), lower SFT (p = 0.004), lower APD (p = 0.000) and lower LRD (p = 0.014) groups. The estimated blood loss was significantly less in the lower BMI (p = 0.035), lower LSA (p = 0.001), lower PAAD (p = 0.012), lower SFT (p = 0.003), lower APD (p = 0.000) and lower LRD (p = 0.005) groups. The complications were fewer in the lower LSA (p = 0.012), lower APD (p = 0.043) and lower LRD (p = 0.023) groups. In females, the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the lower PAAD (p = 0.027) and lower SFT (p = 0.004) groups, and the lower SFT group had fewer complications (p = 0.020). Furthermore, in multivariate analysis, higher PAAD (p = 0.037, odds ratio = 1.030, 95% CI = 1.002-1.059) was an independent factor for predicting postoperative complications in males. Conclusion: Various abdominal shapes can affect the difficulty of LADG. Higher PAAD is a simple independent index for predicting postoperative complications in males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Tao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yu-Xi Cheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiao-Yu Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chao Yuan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Dong Peng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ye H, Chen P, Wang YF, Cai XJ. Endoscopic Versus Surgical Therapy for Early Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma Based on Lymph Node Metastasis Risk: A Population-Based Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:716470. [PMID: 34976786 PMCID: PMC8718685 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.716470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In this study, we aimed to compare the prognosis and lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk in patients with early-stage esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma after endoscopic treatment (ET) or radical surgery. Methods We collected data from eligible patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2016. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of LNM (examination of at least 16 lymph nodes). Cox regression analysis and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis were subsequently utilized to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients treated with ET or radical surgery. Results In total, 3708 patients were identified. Among them, 856 patients had greater than or equal to 16 examined lymph nodes (LNs) (LNE≥16). The LNM rates were 18.8% in all patients 8.3% in T1a patients and 24.6% in T1b patients. Independent predictors of LNM were submucosal invasion, tumor size ≥3cm and decreasing differentiation (P<0.05). The LNM rate decreased to approximately 5.3% in T1b tumors with well differentiation and tumor size <3cm. However, the LNM incidence increased to 17.9% or 33.3% in T1a tumors with poor differentiation or with both tumor size≥3cm and poor differentiation. Cox regression analysis demonstrated CSS was not significantly different in early-stage EGJ adenocarcinoma patients undergoing ET and those treated with radical surgery (HR= 1.004, P=0.974), which were robustly validated after PSM analysis. Moreover, subgroup analysis stratified by T1a and T1b showed similar results. Conclusions The findings of this study indicated ET as an alternative to radical surgery in early EGJ adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua Ye
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hernia Ward, HwaMei Hospital, University Of Chinese Academy Of Sciences, Ningbo, China
- Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive System Tumors of Zhejiang Province, Ningbo, China
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hernia Ward, HwaMei Hospital, University Of Chinese Academy Of Sciences, Ningbo, China
- Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Digestive System Tumors of Zhejiang Province, Ningbo, China
| | - Yi-Fan Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiu-Jun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Xiu-Jun Cai,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Díaz del Arco C, Ortega Medina L, Estrada Muñoz L, García Gómez de las Heras S, Fernández Aceñero MJ. Pathologic Lymph Node Staging of Gastric Cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2021; 156:749-765. [PMID: 34273159 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The TNM classification is the main tool for lymph node (LN) staging in gastric cancer (GC). However, alternative LN staging systems have been proposed, and the role of features other than the number of metastatic LNs is being investigated. Our aim is to discuss the main challenges of LN assessment in GC. METHODS Comprehensive review of the literature on alternative LN staging systems, examined LNs, sentinel LN (SLN) biopsy, LN micrometastases (LNMIs), extracapsular extension (ECE), and tumor deposits (TDs) in GC. RESULTS Many controversies exist regarding LN assessment in GC. The TNM classification shows excellent prognostic performance, but alternative prognostic methods such as the LN ratio or log odds of positive LNs have demonstrated to be better than the TNM system in terms of prognostic accuracy. The value of SLN biopsy and LNMIs in GC is still unclear, and several challenges concerning their clinical impact and pathologic analysis must be overcome before their introduction in clinical practice. Most authors have identified ECE and TDs as independent prognostic factors for survival in GC. CONCLUSIONS Further studies should be performed to evaluate the impact of these features on the TNM classification and patient outcomes, as well as to standardize alternative LN staging systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Díaz del Arco
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Ortega Medina
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - M Jesús Fernández Aceñero
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ollek S, Wen D, Ong I, Anderson W, Harman R, Martin R. Proposed Quality Performance Indicators (QPI's) for axillary lymphadenectomy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:3011-3019. [PMID: 34489121 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Axillary lymph node clearance (ALNC) continues to play a central role in the management of melanoma. However, what defines an adequate lymphadenectomy remains unclear. We aimed to propose Quality Performance Indicators (QPIs) for ALNC and to determine if the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed impacts survival. METHODS We reviewed patients who underwent ALNC for melanoma at the Waitemata District Health Board and Melanoma Unit between February 2005 and October 2019, performed by two surgeons with standardized technique and surveillance. RESULTS 105 patients with stage III melanoma were included, of which 73 had clinically evident disease and 32 had clinically occult disease. The mean total number of LNs excised was 29 (SD 10.90, range 10-76). On multivariate analysis, lymph node ratio (HR 4.48, 95% CI 1.55-12.93, p = 0.006), extracapsular spread (HR 2.53, 95% CI 1.06-6.05, p = 0.036) and distant recurrence (HR 11.24, 95% CI 3.79-33.31, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of mortality. The number of LNs removed did not predict survival outcomes, while the lymph node ratio did significantly predict survival outcomes. The regional recurrence rate was 3.8%. DISCUSSION We propose that QPIs for ALNC in melanoma include a 90th percentile LN yield of greater than 15, a mean LN yield of 20, a regional recurrence rate of less than 10%, and an overall complication rate of less than 50%. CONCLUSION The establishment of QPIs can help ensure that surgical oncology patients receive the highest quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sita Ollek
- Surgical Oncology Fellow, University of British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Daniel Wen
- House Officer, North Shore Hospital, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ian Ong
- Surgical Registrar, North Shore Hospital, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - William Anderson
- Surgical Registrar, North Shore Hospital, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Richard Harman
- Director General Surgery, Melanoma Unit, North Shore Hospital, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Richard Martin
- Cutaneous Surgical Oncologist, Head/Neck and General Surgeon, Melanoma Unit, Waitemata District Health Board, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang F, Zhang X, Li Y, Tang L, Qu X, Ying J, Zhang J, Sun L, Lin R, Qiu H, Wang C, Qiu M, Cai M, Wu Q, Liu H, Guan W, Zhou A, Zhang Y, Liu T, Bi F, Yuan X, Rao S, Xin Y, Sheng W, Xu H, Li G, Ji J, Zhou Z, Liang H, Zhang Y, Jin J, Shen L, Li J, Xu R. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2021. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2021; 41:747-795. [PMID: 34197702 PMCID: PMC8360643 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 373] [Impact Index Per Article: 124.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
There exist differences in the epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biological characteristics, treatment patterns, and drug selections between gastric cancer patients from the Eastern and Western countries. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) has organized a panel of senior experts specializing in all sub-specialties of gastric cancer to compile a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer since 2016 and renews it annually. Taking into account regional differences, giving full consideration to the accessibility of diagnosis and treatment resources, these experts have conducted expert consensus judgment on relevant evidence and made various grades of recommendations for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer to reflect the value of cancer treatment and meeting health economic indexes in China. The 2021 CSCO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer covers the diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and screening of gastric cancer. Based on the 2020 version of the CSCO Chinese Gastric Cancer guidelines, this updated guideline integrates the results of major clinical studies from China and overseas for the past year, focused on the inclusion of research data from the Chinese population for more personalized and clinically relevant recommendations. For the comprehensive treatment of non-metastatic gastric cancer, attentions were paid to neoadjuvant treatment. The value of perioperative chemotherapy is gradually becoming clearer and its recommendation level has been updated. For the comprehensive treatment of metastatic gastric cancer, recommendations for immunotherapy were included, and immune checkpoint inhibitors from third-line to the first-line of treatment for different patient groups with detailed notes are provided.
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen YH, Lu J, Nie RC, Liu D, Liu AH, Deng ZJ, Chen XJ, Xiang J, Chen YB, Huang CM, Chen S, Peng JS. Retrieval of 30 Lymph Nodes Is Mandatory for Selected Stage II Gastric Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:593470. [PMID: 33996537 PMCID: PMC8121255 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.593470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background According to the 8th edition AJCC staging manual, a least of 16 lymph nodes retrieval (LNRs) is the minimal requirement for lymph nodes (LNs) dissection of gastric cancer surgery. Previous studies have shown that increasing the number of LNRs (≥30) prolongs survival for selected patients. However, the necessity of retrieving 30 or more LN for stage II gastric cancer patients is still under debate. Aim This study aims to explore the impact of retrieving 30 or more lymph nodes on the survival of stage II cancer patients. Methods A total of 1,177 patients diagnosed with stage II gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological parameters and the impact of different LNRs (<30 or ≥30) and positive lymph node ratio (NR) on overall survival (OS) were retrospectively analyzed. Results The mean number of LNRs was 34 ± 15. A total of 44% (518/1,177) of patients had an LNRs <30, while 56% (659/1,177) of patients had an LNRs ≥30. The 5-year survival rate was 81% for all patients, 76% for the LNRs <30 group, and 86% for LNRs ≥30 group, respectively (P = 0.003). The survival benefit of retrieving 30 lymph nodes was significant in certain subgroups: age >60 years/male/underwent total gastrectomy/stage IIB. For N+ patients, higher NR was significantly correlated with poor survival. Conclusion The survival benefit of retrieving 30 LNs varies in different subgroups. An LNRs of 30 is mandatory for selected stage II gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-He Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Run-Cong Nie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dan Liu
- Department of Laboratory Science, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ai-Hong Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zi-Jian Deng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xi-Jie Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Xiang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ying-Bo Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shi Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun-Sheng Peng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cai Z, Song H, Fingerhut A, Sun J, Ma J, Zhang L, Li S, Yu C, Zheng M, Zang L. A greater lymph node yield is required during pathological examination in microsatellite instability-high gastric cancer. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:319. [PMID: 33765970 PMCID: PMC7992823 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08044-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of microsatellite status on lymph node (LN) yield during lymphadenectomy and pathological examination has never been assessed in gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we aimed to appraise the association between microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and LN yield after curative gastrectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 1757 patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy and divided them into two groups: MSI-H (n = 185(10.5%)) and microsatellite stability (MSS) (n = 1572(89.5%)), using a five-Bethesda-marker (NR-24, BAT-25, BAT-26, CAT-25, MONO-27) panel. The median LN count and the percentage of specimens with a minimum of 16 LNs (adequate LN ratio) were compared between the two groups. The log odds (LODDS) of positive LN count (PLNC) to negative LN count (NLNC) and the target LN examined threshold (TLNT(x%)) were calculated in both groups. Results Statistically significant differences were found in the median LN count between MSI-H and MSS groups for the complete cohort (30 vs. 28, p = 0.031), for patients undergoing distal gastrectomy (DG) (30 vs. 27, p = 0.002), for stage II patients undergoing DG (34 vs. 28, p = 0.005), and for LN-negative patients undergoing DG (28 vs. 24, p = 0.002). MSI-H was an independent factor for higher total LN count in patients undergoing DG (p = 0.011), but it was not statistically correlated to the adequate LN ratio. Statistically significant differences in PLNC, NLNC and LODDS were found between MSI-H GC and MSS GC (all p < 0.001). The TLNT(90%) for MSI-H and MSS groups were 31 and 25, respectively. TLNT(X%) of MSI-H GC was always higher than that of MSS GC regardless of the given value of X%. Conclusions MSI-H was associated with higher LN yield in patients undergoing gastrectomy for GC. Although MSI-H did not affect the adequacy of LN harvest, we speculate that a greater lymph node yield is required during pathological examination in MSI-H GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenghao Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China.,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Haiqin Song
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China.,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Abe Fingerhut
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China.,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.,Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Jing Sun
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China.,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Junjun Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China.,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Luyang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China.,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Shuchun Li
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China.,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Chaoran Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China.,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Minhua Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China. .,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.
| | - Lu Zang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, P. R. China. .,Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Identifying Outlier Hospitals in Gastric Cancer Lymph Node Yield Using the National Cancer Database. J Surg Res 2021; 261:196-204. [PMID: 33450628 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node (LN) yield is a key quality indicator that is associated with improved staging in surgically resected gastric cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends a yield of ≥15 LNs for proper staging, yet most facilities in the United States fail to achieve this number. The present study aimed to identify factors that could affect LN yield on a facility level and identify outlier hospitals. METHODS This was a retrospective review of adults (aged ≥18 y) with gastric cancer (Tumor-Node-Metastasis Stages I-III) who underwent gastrectomy. Data were analyzed from the National Cancer Database (2004-2016). Multivariate analysis identified patient and tumor characteristics, whereas an observed-to-expected ratio of identified outlier hospitals. Facility factors were compared between high and low outliers. RESULTS A total of 26,590 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, only 50.3% had an LN yield ≥15. The multivariate model of patient and tumor characteristics demonstrated a concordance index was 0.684. A total of 1245 facilities were included. There were 198 low outlier LN yield hospitals and 135 high outlier LN yield hospitals (observed-to-expected ratio of 0.42 ± 0.24 versus 1.38 ± 0.19, P < 0.0001). There was a difference in facility type between low and high outliers (P < 0.0001). High LN yield hospitals had a larger surgical volume than low LN yield hospitals (median 8.4 [4.9, 13.5] versus 3.5 [2.4, 5.2]; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of the population exhibited low compliance to National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations. Facility-level disparities exist as high yearly surgical volume and academic facility status distinguished high-performing outlier hospitals.
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhong Q, Chen QY, Parisi A, Ma YB, Lin GT, Desiderio J, Yan S, Xie JW, Wang JB, Hou JF, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Liu ZY, Que SJ, Li P, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Modified ypTNM Staging Classification for Gastric Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Multi-Institutional Study. Oncologist 2020; 26:e99-e110. [PMID: 32864840 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) are increasingly recognized. The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual first proposed ypTNM staging, but its accuracy is controversial. This study aims to develop a modified ypTNM staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinicopathological data of 1,791 patients who underwent curative-intent gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, as the development cohort, were retrospectively analyzed. Modified ypTNM staging was established based on overall survival (OS). We compared the prognostic performance of the AJCC 8th edition ypTNM staging and the modified staging for patients after neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS In the development cohort, the 5-year OS for AJCC stages I, II, and III was 58.8%, 39.1%, and 21.6%, respectively, compared with 69.9%, 54.4%, 34.4%, 24.1%, and 13.6% for modified ypTNM stages IA, IB, II, IIIA, and IIIB. The modified staging had better discriminatory ability (C-index: 0.620 vs. 0.589, p < .001), predictive homogeneity (likelihood ratio chi-square: 140.71 vs. 218.66, p < .001), predictive accuracy (mean difference in Bayesian information criterion: 64.94; net reclassification index: 35.54%; integrated discrimination improvement index: 0.032; all p < .001), and model stability (time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curves) over AJCC. Decision curve analysis showed that the modified staging achieved a better net benefit than AJCC. In external validation (n = 266), the modified ypTNM staging had superior prognostic predictive power (all p < .05). CONCLUSION We have developed and validated a modified ypTNM staging through multicenter data that is superior to the AJCC 8th edition ypTNM staging, allowing more accurate assessment of the prognosis of patients with GC after neoadjuvant therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual first proposed ypTNM staging, but its accuracy is controversial. Based on multi-institutional data, this study developed a modified ypTNM staging, which is superior to the AJCC 8th edition ypTNM staging, allowing more accurate assessment of the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Zhong
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Qi-Yue Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Yu-Bin Ma
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, People's Republic of China
| | - Guang-Tan Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Su Yan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian-Wei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia-Bin Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun-Fang Hou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian-Xian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Long-Long Cao
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Mi Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ru-Hong Tu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ze-Ning Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ju-Li Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Yu Liu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Si-Jin Que
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Prognostic impact of anatomical extent of metastatic lymph node on gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 23:773-782. [PMID: 32772226 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02468-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current gastric cancer staging systems overlook the anatomic extent of metastatic lymph nodes (AEMLNs). This study aimed to analyze the prognostic impact of AEMLNs on gastric cancer (GC). METHODS GC patients with metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) undergoing curative surgery were retrospectively reviewed and assigned to perigastric (MLNs in station 1-6, PG) and extraperigastric group (7-12, with or without MLNs in PG area, EPG). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence patterns were compared before and after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS 662 patients were enrolled, 341 (51.5%) and 321 (48.5%) of whom were in the PG and EPG, respectively. After PSM (n = 195), EPG showed poorer 5-year OS (43.4% vs 54.5%, p = 0.014) and DFS (65.0% vs 73.4%, p = 0.068) than PG. EPG had higher incidence of peritoneal recurrence (PR) than PG (19.4% vs 7.4%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified AEMLNs as prognostic factor for OS [HR = 1.409, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.062-1.868), DFS (HR = 1.600, 95% CI 1.059-2.416) and PR (HR = 3.708, 95% CI 1.685-8.160). CONCLUSIONS The anatomic extent of metastatic lymph nodes has an independent prognostic role for GC. Including this element may improve the accuracy of current staging systems.
Collapse
|
18
|
Lum CY, Huang KH, Chen MH, Fang WL, Chao Y, Lo SS, Li AFY, Wu CW, Shyr YM. The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with node-positive gastric cancer after curative surgery. J Chin Med Assoc 2020; 83:751-755. [PMID: 32349036 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymph node (LN) metastasis is one of the independent prognostic factors of gastric cancer (GC). The difference in survival rates and initial recurrence patterns in patients with node-positive GC with retrieved LN numbers greater than or less than 16 is worthy of further study. METHODS A total of 1314 patients with node-positive GC were enrolled. The clinicopathological characteristics, retrieved LN numbers, adjuvant chemotherapy, initial recurrence patterns, and survival differences between serosa-negative and serosa-positive GC were investigated. RESULTS For serosa-negative GC, patients with retrieved LN numbers ≥16 were associated with fewer tumor recurrences, locoregional recurrences, distant metastases, and better 5-year overall survival (OS) rates and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. For serosa-positive GC, patients with retrieved LN numbers ≥16 were associated with similar locoregional and distant metastasis and similar 5-year OS and DFS rates compared with those with retrieved LN numbers <16. Retrieved LN numbers fewer than 16 can cause stage migration compared with retrieved LN numbers ≥16. Multivariate analysis showed that both the retrieved LN numbers (≥ or <16) and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors affecting OS in serosa-negative GC, while adjuvant chemotherapy but not the retrieved LN numbers was an independent prognostic factor of OS in serosa-positive GC. CONCLUSION For serosa-negative GC, retrieved LN numbers fewer than 16 can cause stage migration, a higher tumor recurrence rate and worse OS and DFS rates compared with patients with retrieved LN numbers ≥16. Due to a high tumor recurrence rate in serosa-positive GC, adjuvant chemotherapy rather than retrieved LN numbers played an important role in improving patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih Yean Lum
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Kuo-Hung Huang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Ming-Huang Chen
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Oncology, Center of Immuno-Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wen-Liang Fang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yee Chao
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Oncology, Center of Immuno-Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Su-Shun Lo
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Anna Fen-Yau Li
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chew-Wun Wu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Ming Shyr
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world, despite declining incidence of the disease in the United States. Because of the rare occurrence of the disease in the United States, there is significant treatment variance in use of diagnostic modalities, neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies, and surgical techniques. The survival of patients with gastric cancer in the United States is significantly lower than those of Asian countries where the diagnosis is made at an earlier stage and uniform high-quality treatment is delivered. This article reviews pearls and pitfalls of multidisciplinary management of the gastric adenocarcinoma for best outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisakazu Hoshi
- Division of Endocrine and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, 4637 JCP, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Surgery for Gastric Cancer: State of the Art. Indian J Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-019-02061-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
21
|
Xu Z, Jing J, Ma G. Development and validation of prognostic nomogram based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma. Chin J Cancer Res 2020; 32:778-793. [PMID: 33447000 PMCID: PMC7797227 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.06.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Our aims were to establish novel nomogram models, which directly targeted patients with signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC), for individualized prediction of overall survival (OS) rate and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Methods We selected 1,365 SRC patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, and then randomly partitioned them into a training cohort and a validation cohort. Independent predicted indicators, which were identified by using univariate testing and multivariate analyses, were used to construct our prognostic nomogram models. Three methods, Harrell concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and calibration curve, were used to assess the ability of discrimination and predictive accuracy. Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess clinical utility of our nomogram models. Results Six independent predicted indicators, age, race, log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), T stage, M stage and tumor size, were associated with OS rate. Nevertheless, only five independent predicted indicators were associated with CSS except race. The developed nomograms based on those independent predicted factors showed reliable discrimination. C-index of our nomogram for OS and CSS was 0.760 and 0.763, which were higher than American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system (0.734 and 0.741, respectively). C-index of validation cohort for OS was 0.757 and for CSS was 0.773. The calibration curves also performed good consistency. IDI, NRI and DCA showed the nomograms for both OS and CSS had a comparable clinical utility than the TNM staging system. Conclusions The novel nomogram models based on LODDS provided satisfying predictive ability of SRC both in OS and CSS than AJCC 8th edition TNM staging system alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zijie Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
| | - Jing Jing
- Department of Endocrinology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
| | - Guiliang Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Overweight or Obesity is an Unfavorable Long-Term Prognostic Factor for Patients who Underwent Gastrectomy for Stage II/III Gastric Cancer. World J Surg 2019; 43:1766-1776. [PMID: 30820737 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-04969-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity has been reported to be a prognostic factor for many diseases in epidemiological studies; however, the results of studies examining the relationship between obesity and gastric cancer (GC) prognosis are inconsistent. METHODS A total of 460 patients with Stage II and III GC who underwent open R0 gastrectomy were included. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI classified into < 18.5, 18.5-25, and ≥ 25 kg/m2), stage, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed to investigate the correlation with relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS Five-year RFS was 51% for the study patients. Five-year RFS values were 47.6%, 54.3%, and 40.1% for patients with BMI < 18.5, 18.5-25, and ≥ 25 kg/m2, respectively. The forest plot for relapse risk according to BMI showed a U shape. Multivariate analysis for RFS showed significant differences in stage and BMI; the hazard ratio for recurrence in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was 1.42 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.02, p = 0.0423) with reference to patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2. BMI ≥ 25.0 was associated with longer operation times, more blood loss, fewer lymph nodes dissected, more frequent postoperative surgical site infection, and intra-abdominal abscesses. CONCLUSIONS BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 is an unfavorable prognostic factor for patients who underwent gastrectomy for Stage II and III GC.
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang JB, Zhong Q, Wang W, Desiderio J, Chen S, Liu ZY, Chen QY, Li P, Xie JW, Liu FQ, Zheng CH, Peng JS, Zhou ZW, Parisi A, Huang CM. Postoperative dynamic survival of gastric cancer patients: A multi-institutional, international analysis of 22 265 patients. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120:685-697. [PMID: 31317558 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND How to best evaluate the disease-specific survival (DSS) of gastric cancer (GC) survivors over time is unclear. METHODS Clinicopathological data from 22 265 patients who underwent curative intend resection for GC were retrospectively analyzed. Changes in the patients' 3-year conditional disease-specific survival (CS3) were analyzed. We used time-dependent Cox regression to analyze which variables had long-term effects on DSS and devised a dynamic predictive model based on the length of survival. RESULTS Based on 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivorships, the CS3 of the population increased gradually from 62% to 68.1%, 83.7%, and 90.6%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the CS3 of patients who had poor prognostic factors initially demonstrated the greatest increase in postoperative survival time (eg, N3b: 26.6%-84.1%, Δ57.5% vs N0: 84.1%-93.3%, Δ9.2%). Time-dependent Cox regression analysis showed the following predictor variables constantly affecting DSS: age, the number of examined lymph nodes (LNs), T stage, N stage, and site (P < .05). These variables served as the basis for a dynamic prediction model. CONCLUSIONS The influence of prognostic factors on DSS and CS3 changed dramatically over time. We developed an effective model for predicting the DSS of patients with GC based on the length of survival time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Bin Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Division of Gastric Cancer, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qing Zhong
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Division of Gastric Cancer, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangdong, China
| | - Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Shi Chen
- Department of Esophageal and Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University Research Center of Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Yu Liu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Division of Gastric Cancer, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qi-Yue Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Division of Gastric Cancer, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Division of Gastric Cancer, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Wei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Division of Gastric Cancer, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Feng-Qiong Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistic, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Division of Gastric Cancer, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun-Sheng Peng
- Department of Esophageal and Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University Research Center of Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangdong, China
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Division of Gastric Cancer, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Seeruttun SR, Xu L, Wang F, Yi X, Fang C, Liu Z, Wang W, Zhou Z. A homogenized approach to classify advanced gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2019; 39:32. [PMID: 31182160 PMCID: PMC6558883 DOI: 10.1186/s40880-019-0370-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with a limited number of pathologically examined lymph nodes (eLN, < 16) is dismal compared to those with adequately eLN (≥ 16), yet they are still classified within the same subgroups using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. We aimed at formulating an easy-to-adopt and clinically reliable stratification approach to homogenize the classification for these two categories of patients. Methods Patients staged according to the 8th AJCC pathological nodal (N) and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification were stratified into a Limited and Adequate eLN cohort based on their number of pathologically examined LNs. The statistical differences between the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of both cohorts were determined and based on which, patients from the Limited eLN cohort were re-classified to a proposed modified nodal (N′) and TNM (TN′M) classification, by matching their survival rates with those of the Adequate eLN cohort. The prognostic performance of the N′ and TN′M classification was then compared to a formulated lymph-node-ratio-based nodal classification, in addition to the 8th AJCC N and TNM classification. Results Significant heterogeneous differences in 5-year OS between patients from the Limited and Adequate eLN cohort of the same nodal subgroups were identified (all P < 0.001). However, no significant differences in 5-year OS were observed between the subgroups N0, N1, N2, and N3a of the Limited eLN cohort when compared with N1, N2, N3a, and N3b from the Adequate eLN cohort, respectively (P = 0.853, 0.476, 0.114, and 0.230, respectively). A novel approach was formulated in which only patients from the Limited eLN cohort were re-classified to one higher nodal subgroup, denoted as the N′ classification. This re-classification demonstrated superior stratifying and prognostic ability as compared to the 8th AJCC N and lymph-node-ratio classification (Akaike information criterion values [AIC]: 12,276 vs. 12,358 vs. 12,283, respectively). The TN′M classification also demonstrated superior prognostic ability as compared to the 8th AJCC TNM classification (AIC value: 12,252 vs. 12,312). Conclusion The proposed lymph node classification approach provides a clinically practical and reliable technique to homogeneously classify cohorts of gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharvesh Raj Seeruttun
- Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Lipu Xu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Fangwei Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Affiliated Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Lu'an, 237005, Anhui, P. R. China
| | - Xiaodong Yi
- Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Cheng Fang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Zhimin Liu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
| | - Zhiwei Zhou
- Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chen QY, Zhong Q, Zhou JF, Qiu XT, Dang XY, Cai LS, Su GQ, Xu DB, Liu ZY, Li P, Guo KQ, Xie JW, Chen QX, Wang JB, Li TW, Lin JX, Lin SM, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Lin W, He QL, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Development and External Validation of Web-Based Models to Predict the Prognosis of Remnant Gastric Cancer after Surgery: A Multicenter Study. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:6012826. [PMID: 31093283 PMCID: PMC6481035 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6012826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is a rare malignant tumor with poor prognosis. There is no universally accepted prognostic model for RGC. METHODS We analyzed data for 253 RGC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy from 6 centers. The prognosis prediction performances of the AJCC7th and AJCC8th TNM staging systems and the TRM staging system for RGC patients were evaluated. Web-based prediction models based on independent prognostic factors were developed to predict the survival of the RGC patients. External validation was performed using a cohort of 49 Chinese patients. RESULTS The predictive abilities of the AJCC8th and TRM staging systems were no better than those of the AJCC7th staging system (c-index: AJCC7th vs. AJCC8th vs. TRM, 0.743 vs. 0.732 vs. 0.744; P>0.05). Within each staging system, the survival of the two adjacent stages was not well discriminated (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that age, tumor size, T stage, and N stage were independent prognostic factors. Based on the above variables, we developed 3 web-based prediction models, which were superior to the AJCC7th staging system in their discriminatory ability (c-index), predictive homogeneity (likelihood ratio chi-square), predictive accuracy (AIC, BIC), and model stability (time-dependent ROC curves). External validation showed predictable accuracies of 0.780, 0.822, and 0.700, respectively, in predicting overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS The AJCC TNM staging system and the TRM staging system did not enable good distinction among the RGC patients. We have developed and validated visual web-based prediction models that are superior to these staging systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi-Yue Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qing Zhong
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun-Feng Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xian-Tu Qiu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research Institute, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China
| | - Xue-Yi Dang
- Department of General Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shanxi, China
| | - Li-Sheng Cai
- Department of General Surgery Unit 4, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Qiang Su
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Dong-Bo Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Zhi-Yu Liu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Kai-Qing Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shanxi, China
| | - Jian-Wei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qiu-Xian Chen
- Department of General Surgery Unit 4, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China
| | - Jia-Bin Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Teng-Wen Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jian-Xian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shuang-Ming Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Longyan First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China
| | - Jun Lu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Long-Long Cao
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Mi Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ru-Hong Tu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ze-Ning Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Ju-Li Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Wei Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research Institute, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China
| | - Qing-Liang He
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chao-Hui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chang-Ming Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang FH, Shen L, Li J, Zhou ZW, Liang H, Zhang XT, Tang L, Xin Y, Jin J, Zhang YJ, Yuan XL, Liu TS, Li GX, Wu Q, Xu HM, Ji JF, Li YF, Wang X, Yu S, Liu H, Guan WL, Xu RH. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2019; 39:10. [PMID: 30885279 PMCID: PMC6423835 DOI: 10.1186/s40880-019-0349-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 298] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
China is one of the countries with the highest incidence of gastric cancer. There are differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biological characteristics, treatment patterns, and drug selection between gastric cancer patients from the Eastern and Western countries. Non-Chinese guidelines cannot specifically reflect the diagnosis and treatment characteristics for the Chinese gastric cancer patients. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) arranged for a panel of senior experts specializing in all sub-specialties of gastric cancer to compile, discuss, and revise the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer based on the findings of evidence-based medicine in China and abroad. By referring to the opinions of industry experts, taking into account of regional differences, giving full consideration to the accessibility of diagnosis and treatment resources, these experts have conducted experts' consensus judgement on relevant evidence and made various grades of recommendations for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer to reflect the value of cancer treatment and meeting health economic indexes. This guideline uses tables and is complemented by explanatory and descriptive notes covering the diagnosis, comprehensive treatment, and follow-up visits for gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng-Hua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Jin Li
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120 P. R. China
| | - Zhi-Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Han Liang
- Department of Gastric Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Cancer for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, 300060 P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Tian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Lei Tang
- Medical Imaging Department, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Yan Xin
- Pathology Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001 Liaoning P. R. China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, China and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 P. R. China
| | - Yu-Jing Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Xiang-Lin Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei P. R. China
| | - Tian-Shu Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 P. R. China
| | - Guo-Xin Li
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Qi Wu
- Department of Endoscopy Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Hui-Mian Xu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001 Liaoning P. R. China
| | - Jia-Fu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Yuan-Fang Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, China and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 P. R. China
| | - Shan Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 P. R. China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Wen-Long Guan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Huang SF, Chien TH, Fang WL, Wang F, Tsai CY, Hsu JT, Yeh CN, Chen TC, Wu RC, Chiu CT, Yeh TS. The 8th edition American Joint Committee on gastric cancer pathological staging classification performs well in a population with high proportion of locally advanced disease. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1634-1639. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Revised: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
28
|
Martinson HA, Shelby NJ, Alberts SR, Olnes MJ. Gastric cancer in Alaska Native people: A cancer health disparity. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:2722-2732. [PMID: 29991877 PMCID: PMC6034149 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i25.2722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate recent trends in gastric cancer incidence, response to treatment, and overall survival among Alaska Native (AN) people. METHODS A retrospective analysis of the Alaska Native Medical Center patient database was performed. Patient history, clinical, pathological, response to treatment and patient outcomes were collected from one-hundred and thirty-two AN gastric cancer patients. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result database 18 was used to collect comparison United States non-Hispanic White (NHW) and AN gastric cancer patient data between 2006-2014. RESULTS AN gastric cancer patients have a higher incidence rate, a poorer overall survival, and are diagnosed at a significantly younger age compared to NHW patients. AN patients differ from NHW patients in greater prevalence of non-cardia, diffuse subtype, and signet ring cell carcinomas. AN females were more likely to be diagnosed with later stage cancer, stage IV, compared to AN males. Diminished overall survival was observed among AN patients with increasing stage, O+ blood type, < 15 lymph nodes examined at resection, and no treatment. This study is the first report detailing the clinicopathologic features of gastric cancer in AN people with outcome data. CONCLUSION Our findings confirm the importance of early detection, treatment, and surgical resection for optimizing AN patient outcomes. Further research on early detection markers are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly A Martinson
- WWAMI School of Medical Education, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK 99508, United States
| | - Nancy J Shelby
- WWAMI School of Medical Education, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK 99508, United States
| | - Steven R Alberts
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Matthew J Olnes
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, AK 99508, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Coburn N, Cosby R, Klein L, Knight G, Malthaner R, Mamazza J, Mercer CD, Ringash J. Staging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 63:104-115. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
30
|
Coburn N, Cosby R, Klein L, Knight G, Malthaner R, Mamazza J, Mercer CD, Ringash J. Staging and surgical approaches in gastric cancer: a clinical practice guideline. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 24:324-331. [PMID: 29089800 DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection is the cornerstone of cure for gastric adenocarcinoma; however, several aspects of surgical intervention remain controversial or are suboptimally applied at a population level, including staging, extent of lymphadenectomy (lnd), minimum number of lymph nodes that have to be assessed, gross resection margins, use of minimally invasive surgery, and relationship of surgical volumes with patient outcomes and resection in stage iv gastric cancer. METHODS Literature searches were conducted in databases including medline (up to 10 June 2016), embase (up to week 24 of 2016), the Cochrane Library and various other practice guideline sites and guideline developer Web sites. A practice guideline was developed. RESULTS One guideline, seven systematic reviews, and forty-eight primary studies were included in the evidence base for this guidance document. Seven recommendations are presented. CONCLUSIONS All patients should be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting, and computed tomography (ct) imaging of chest and abdomen should always be performed when staging patients. Diagnostic laparoscopy is useful in the determination of M1 disease not visible on ct images. A D2 lnd is preferred for curative-intent resection of gastric cancer. At least 16 lymph nodes should be assessed for adequate staging of curative-resected gastric cancer. Gastric cancer surgery should aim to achieve an R0 resection margin. In the metastatic setting, surgery should be considered only for palliation of symptoms. Patients should be referred to higher-volume centres and those that have adequate support to manage potential complications. Laparoscopic resections should be performed to the same standards as those for open resections, by surgeons who are experienced in both advanced laparoscopic surgery and gastric cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R Cosby
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton
| | - L Klein
- Humber River Regional Hospital, Toronto
| | - G Knight
- Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener
| | | | | | | | - J Ringash
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shu P, Qin J, Shen K, Chen W, Liu F, Fang Y, Wang X, Wang H, Shen Z, Sun Y, Qin X. The IGCA staging system is more accurate than AJCC7 system in stratifying survival of patients with gastric cancer in stage III. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:238. [PMID: 28359303 PMCID: PMC5374584 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3235-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A new staging system recently proposed by the IGCA has demonstrated a better capacity of stratifying different prognoses for gastric cancer than the 7th edition AJCC staging system (AJCC7). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the IGCA system in Chinese patients. Methods Medical records of patients with gastric cancer who received curative surgery in our center from January 2003 to December 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. All the lesions were staged according to both AJCC7 and IGCA staging systems. Overall survival (OS) of the patients was used as the observation endpoint. Results One thousand five hundred twenty-six cases were included in this study. By comparing the AJCC7 system with the IGCA systems, 395 cases were stratified into different stages, most of which were in stage III. The IGCA system could better stratify stage IIIB and IIIC patients (5-year OS, 38.1% vs. 29.0%; P = 0.005) than the AJCC7 system (5-year OS, 38.2% vs. 35.9%; P = 0.148). T3N3bM0, T4aN2M0 and T4aN3bM0 made up 97.5% (385/395) of the stage shift. T3N3bM0, which was stratified to stage IIIB in the AJCC7 system, showed a significant poorer prognosis than T4aN2M0 and T4aN3aM0, which were staged to IIIB and IIIC in the same system. The improper staging was revised in the IGCA staging system. Conclusions The IGCA staging system can stratify stage III gastric cancer patients more properly than the AJCC7 system. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3235-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Shu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Qin
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Kuntang Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Weidong Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Fenglin Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong Fang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuefei Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongshan Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenbin Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yihong Sun
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xinyu Qin
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ott K, Blank S, Ruspi L, Bauer M, Sisic L, Schmidt T. Prognostic impact of nodal status and therapeutic implications. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2:15. [PMID: 28447050 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2017.01.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognostic impact of lymph node (LN) metastases in gastric cancer is generally accepted. In primarily resected patients the pN-category and LN ratio are independent prognostic factors. Number of involved LNs, number of resected LNs, lymphangiosis and micrometastases also influence the prognosis significantly. To guarantee a proper D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD) at least 25 LNs according to the German S3 guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer should be removed. Also in neoadjuvantly treated patients the ypN-category and LN ratio play an important prognostic role, despite the fact that UICC staging system was development based only on primarily resected patients. The role of response of LNs in neoadjuvantly treated patients is still unclear and needs further investigation. It seems to be less important than the response of the primary tumor. Limited data exists, suggesting that preoperative treatment might reduce the number of LNs involved and improve ypN-category. Due to further development in gastric cancer like laparoscopic resection and effective perioperative treatment in locally advanced tumor the role and the prognostic impact of LAD is again in the focus of discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Ott
- RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, 83022 Rosenheim, Germany
| | - Susanne Blank
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Ruspi
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Margit Bauer
- RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, 83022 Rosenheim, Germany
| | - Leila Sisic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Liu YY, Fang WL, Wang F, Hsu JT, Tsai CY, Liu KH, Yeh CN, Chen TC, Wu RC, Chiu CT, Yeh TS. Does a Higher Cutoff Value of Lymph Node Retrieval Substantially Improve Survival in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer?-Time to Embrace a New Digit. Oncologist 2016; 22:97-106. [PMID: 27789777 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study assessed the impact of the retrieval of >25 lymph nodes (LNs) on the survival outcome of patients with advanced gastric cancer after curative-intent gastrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 5,386 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer from 1994 to 2011 were enrolled. The clinicopathological parameters and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to the number of LNs examined (≤15, n = 916; 16-25, n = 1,458; and >25, n = 3,012). RESULTS The percentage of patients with >25 LNs retrieved increased from 1994 to 2011. Patients in the LN >25 group were more likely to have undergone total gastrectomy and to have a larger tumor size, poorer tumor differentiation, and advanced T and N stages. Hospital mortality among the LN ≤15, LN 16-25, and LN >25 groups was 6.1%, 2.7%, and 1.7%, respectively (p < .0001). The LN >25 group consistently exhibited the most favorable OS, in particular, with stage II disease (p = .011) when OS was stratified according to tumor stage. Similarly, the LN >25 group had significantly better OS in all nodal stages (from N1 to N3b). The discrimination power of the lymph node ratio (LNR) for the LN ≤15, LN 16-25, and LN >25 groups was 483, 766, and 1,560, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the LNR was the most important prognostic factor in the LN >25 group. CONCLUSION Retrieving more than 25 lymph nodes during curative-intent gastrectomy substantially improved survival and survival stratification of advanced gastric cancer without compromising patient safety. The Oncologist 2017;22:97-106Implications for Practice: D2 lymph node (LN) dissection is currently the standard of surgical management of gastric cancer, which is rarely audited by a third party. The present study, one of the largest surgical series worldwide, has shown that the traditionally recognized retrieval of ≥16 LNs during curative-intent gastrectomy might not be adequate in regions in which locally advanced gastric cancers predominate. The presented data show that retrieval of >25 LNs, which more greatly mimics D2 dissection, improves long-term outcomes and survival stratification without compromising patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Yin Liu
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Wen-Liang Fang
- Division of General Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Frank Wang
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jun-Te Hsu
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chun-Yi Tsai
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Keng-Hao Liu
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chun-Nan Yeh
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Tse-Ching Chen
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Ren-Chin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Cheng-Tang Chiu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Ta-Sen Yeh
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jian-Hui C, Shi-Rong C, Hui W, Si-le C, Jian-Bo X, Er-Tao Z, Chuang-Qi C, Yu-Long H. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy. Tumour Biol 2016; 37:11105-13. [PMID: 26912060 PMCID: PMC4999458 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4191-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) was defined as the log of the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and the number of negative lymph nodes, which is a novel and promising nodal staging system for gastric cancer. Here, we aimed to compare the prognostic effect of pN, lymph node ratio (LNR) and LODDS. The association between overall survival and pN, LNR and LODDS was retrospectively analysed. The discriminatory ability and monotonicity of gradients (linear trend χ (2) score), homogeneity ability (likelihood ratio test) and prognostic stratification ability (Akaike information criterion [AIC] and receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve) were compared among three lymph node staging systems. The pN, LNR and LODDS were all identified as independent prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients in the multivariate analysis. LODDS showed the best prognostic performance (linear trend χ (2) score 266.743, likelihood ratio χ (2) test score 427.771, AIC value 5670.226, area under the curve (AUC) 0.793), followed by LNR and pN. In patients with different levels of retrieved lymph nodes (≤10, 11-14, 15-25 and >25), LODDS was the most powerful for prognostic prediction and discrimination of the heterogeneity among the subgroups. Significant differences in survival were observed among patients in different LODDS subgroups after being classified according to the pN and LNR classifications. LODDS appears to be a more powerful system for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients, as compared to LNR and pN, and may serve as an alternative nodal staging system for gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Jian-Hui
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Cai Shi-Rong
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Wu Hui
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Chen Si-le
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Xu Jian-Bo
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Zhai Er-Tao
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Chen Chuang-Qi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
- Gastric Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - He Yu-Long
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
- Gastric Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Herrera-Almario G, Patane M, Sarkaria I, Strong VE. Initial report of near-infrared fluorescence imaging as an intraoperative adjunct for lymph node harvesting during robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol 2016; 113:768-70. [PMID: 27021142 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adequate lymphadenectomy is a fundamental aspect of oncologically sound gastrectomies. Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy is a minimally invasive alternative that allows functional imaging to be easily integrated to the surgical field and may aid in intraoperative identification of lymphovascular bundles. METHODS Indocyanine green application and near-infrared fluorescence imaging were used during robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy as an adjunct for the identification of relevant lymph node basins in real time. RESULTS A total of 31 patients were included. Twenty-nine gastrectomies were performed for adenocarcinoma and two wedge resections for neuroendocrine tumors. The mean lymph node retrieval was twenty-nine (range 17-61) for adenocarcinoma and five for neuroendocrine tumors. In all cases, at least five lymph nodes were seen along the main nodal basins, which provided real time intraoperative feedback regarding lymph node identification. Average time for indocyanine green application and functional imaging was less than 10 min. CONCLUSIONS Near-infrared fluorescent imaging may provide an improved method to help visualize lymph nodes intraoperatively during robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy, thus adding a potentially valuable adjunct for lymphadenectomy and overall lymph node retrieval. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:768-770. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Patane
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| | - Inderpal Sarkaria
- Thoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vivian E Strong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
|