1
|
Tirca L, Savin C, Stroescu C, Balescu I, Petrea S, Diaconu C, Gaspar B, Pop L, Varlas V, Hasegan A, Martac C, Bolca C, Stoian M, Zgura A, Gorecki GP, Bacalbasa N. Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors in GBC. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4201. [PMID: 39064241 PMCID: PMC11278318 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare entity with a poor prognosis, usually discovered late due to nonspecific symptoms; therefore, over the last years, attention has been focused on identifying the risk factors for developing this malignancy in order to provide an early diagnosis, as well as new prognostic factors in order to modulate the long-term evolution of such cases. The aim of this review is to discuss both major risk factors and prognostic factors in GBC for a better understanding and integration of relevant and currently available information. Methods: A literature search was performed using Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, Elsevier, and Web of Science; studies published after the year of 2000, in English, were reviewed. Results: Over time, risk factors associated with the development of GBC have been identified, which outline the profile of patients with this disease. The most important prognostic factors in GBC remain TNM staging, safety margin, and R0 status, along with perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Both the technique and experience of the surgeons and a pathological examination that ensures final staging are particularly important and increase the chances of survival of the patients. Conclusions: improvements in surgical techniques and pathological analyses might provide better and more consistent guidance for medical staff in the management of patients with GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiza Tirca
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Catalin Savin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Cezar Stroescu
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, “Fundeni” Clinical Institute, 022336 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Balescu
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.T.); (C.S.)
| | - Sorin Petrea
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Surgery, “Ion Cantacuzino” Clinical Hospital, 020026 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Camelia Diaconu
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Floreasca” Clinical Emergency Hospital, 014453 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Bogdan Gaspar
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Visceral Surgery, “Floreasca” Clinical Emergency Hospital, 014453 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Lucian Pop
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.P.); (V.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Institute of Mother and Child Care Alessandrescu-Rusescu, 020395 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Valentin Varlas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (L.P.); (V.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filantropia” Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Adrian Hasegan
- Department of Urology, Sibiu Emergency Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sibiu, 550024 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Cristina Martac
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fundeni Clinical Hospital, 022336 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Ciprian Bolca
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, ‘Marius Nasta’ National Institute of Pneumology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, ‘Charles LeMoyne’ Hospital, Longueuil, QC J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Marilena Stoian
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Dr Ion Cantacuzino Hospital, 011438 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anca Zgura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncological Institute Prof.Dr.Al.Trestioreanu, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Medical Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gabriel Petre Gorecki
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, CF 2 Clinical Hospital, 014256 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 021251 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolae Bacalbasa
- Department of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.S.); (S.P.); (B.G.); (N.B.)
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Center of Excellence in Translational Medicine, “Fundeni” Clinical Institute, 022336 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mellado S, Chirban AM, Shapera E, Rivera B, Panettieri E, Vivanco M, Conrad C, Sucandy I, Vega EA. Innovations in surgery for gallbladder cancer: A review of robotic surgery as a feasible and safe option. Am J Surg 2024; 233:37-44. [PMID: 38443272 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgical techniques in the treatment of gallbladder cancer, comparing it with traditional open and laparoscopic methods. METHODS A systematic review of the literature searched for comparative analyses of patient outcomes following robotic, open, and laparoscopic surgeries, focusing on oncological results and perioperative benefits. RESULTS Five total studies published between 2019 and 2023 were identified. Findings indicate that robotic-assisted surgery for gallbladder cancer is as effective as traditional methods in terms of oncological outcomes, with potential advantages in precision and perioperative recovery. CONCLUSIONS Robotic surgery offers a viable and potentially advantageous alternative for gallbladder cancer treatment, warranting further research to confirm its benefits and establish comprehensive surgical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariana M Chirban
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Emanuel Shapera
- Digestive Health Institute, Advent Health Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Belen Rivera
- Department of Surgery, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcelo Vivanco
- Department of Surgery, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, Advent Health Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Naples R, Perlmutter BC, Lu H, Allende D, Tu C, Hitawala A, Chadalavada P, Padbidri V, Haddad A, Simon R, Walsh RM, Augustin T. Intramucosal Extent as a Marker for Advanced Disease and Survival in Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 2024; 90:1133-1139. [PMID: 38174690 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231220581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy and has a poor prognosis. The clinical significance of focal vs diffuse GBC remains unclear. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with non-metastatic GBC at a quaternary care center. Pathology was reviewed, and gallbladder cancer pattern was defined based on the extent of mucosal involvement; "diffuse" if the tumor was multicentric or "focal" if the tumor was only in a single location. Patients undergoing liver resection and portal lymphadenectomy were considered to have definitive surgery. The primary outcome was overall survival and assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS 63 patients met study criteria with 32 (50.7%) having diffuse cancer. No difference was observed in utilization of definitive surgery between the groups (14 [43.8%] with focal and 12 [38.7%] with diffuse, P = .88). Lymphovascular invasion (P = .04) and higher nodal stage (P = .04) were more common with diffuse GBC. Median overall survival was significantly improved in those with focal cancer (5.1 vs 1.2 years, P = .02). Although not statistically significant, this difference in overall survival persisted in patients who underwent definitive surgery (4.3 vs 2.4 years, P = .70). DISCUSSION Patients with diffuse involvement of the gallbladder mucosa likely represent a subset with aggressive biology and worse overall survival compared to focal disease. These findings may aid surgeons in subsequent surgical and medical decision-making for patients with GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Naples
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Haiyan Lu
- Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daniela Allende
- Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Chao Tu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Learner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Asif Hitawala
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Vinay Padbidri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Abdo Haddad
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Fairview Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert Simon
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - R Matthew Walsh
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Toms Augustin
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jajal V, Nekarakanti PK, K S, Nag H. Effects of Cystic Duct Margin Involvement on the Survival Rates of Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Case-Control Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e50585. [PMID: 38226074 PMCID: PMC10788702 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In gallbladder cancer (GBC), extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) resection is selectively performed if gross direct extension or microscopic involvement of the cystic duct margin (CDM) is detected. Although CDM is usually sent for frozen biopsy intraoperatively in most centers, there are no studies regarding the routine use of CDM frozen biopsy irrespective of the tumor location and paucity of literature regarding the impact of CDM status on recurrence-free and overall survival in GBC. The presence of obstructive jaundice in GBC usually indicates the involvement of EHBD or cystic duct-bile duct junction. The present study aimed to analyze the necessity of routine CDM frozen biopsy in patients with resectable GBC without jaundice, regardless of the tumor location. The impact of positive CDM on survival was also evaluated. Methods This retrospective observational case-control study was conducted from May 2009 to March 2021 and included 105 patients with resectable GBC without macroscopic EHBD infiltration and jaundice. Patients were divided into CDM-negative (n=91) and CDM-positive (n=14) groups. Propensity score matching was performed for variables such as performance status, tumor size, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. After propensity score matching, 27 patients (CDM-negative=13, CDM-positive=14) were included. The primary outcome was to analyze the role of routine CDM frozen biopsy regardless of tumor location, and secondary outcomes were to study the impact of positive CDM status on survival and evaluate predictive factors for CDM positivity. A subgroup analysis was conducted to assess clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of the anatomical location of the tumor. Results Of 105 patients, 91 had negative CDM, and 14 had positive CDM. Among 14 patients with positive CDM, only one patient had a tumor in the fundus/body, and the remaining had a tumor involving the neck. All CDM-positive patients underwent bile duct excision with hepaticojejunostomy. Common bile duct (CBD) involvement was present in 50% of patients with positive CDM in the final histopathological examination. In the matched population, patients with positive CDM had a significantly higher rate of neck tumors (p=0.001). Recurrence-free survival (24 vs. 12 months, p=0.30) and overall survival (24.5 vs. 20 months, p=0.417) were comparable between CDM-negative and CDM-positive groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, preoperative and intraoperative tumor location were independent predictive factors for CDM positivity. On subgroup analysis, 30 patients had tumor involving the neck of the gallbladder, and the remaining 75 had at the fundus and body of the gallbladder. Neck tumors had inferior recurrence-free survival (17 vs. 30 months, p=0.012) and overall survival (24 vs. 36 months, p=0.048) compared to non-neck tumors. Conclusions Routine use of CDM frozen analysis in patients with resectable GBC without jaundice, regardless of tumor location, can be avoided. It can be selectively preferred in patients with GBC involving the neck since tumor location is found to be an independent predictive factor for CDM positivity. Positive CDM has comparable survival outcomes to negative CDM, providing a similar R0 resection rate and tumor stage. However, neck tumors have a worse prognosis than non-neck tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasistha Jajal
- Surgical Gastroenterology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, IND
| | - Phani K Nekarakanti
- Surgical Gastroenterology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, IND
| | - Sugumaran K
- Surgical Gastroenterology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, IND
| | - Hirdaya Nag
- Surgical Gastroenterology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, IND
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mellado S, Chirban AM, Rivera B, Panettieri E, Vega EA. ASO Author Reflections: Precision in Gallbladder Cancer Care: Present Challenges and Future Directions. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6601-6602. [PMID: 37548834 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14062-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariana M Chirban
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Belen Rivera
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu ZP, Guo W, Yin DL, Chen WY, Wang JY, Li XL, Yue P, Yu C, Wu ZP, Ding R, Zhu Y, Huang F, Zhou JX, Zhang D, Chen W, Jiang Y, Bai J, Wang JJ, Zhang YQ, Dai HS, Lau WY, Chen ZY. Textbook outcomes in liver surgery for gallbladder cancer patients treated with curative-intent resection: a multicenter observational study. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2751-2761. [PMID: 37288584 PMCID: PMC10498895 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholecystectomy, hepatectomy, and lymphadenectomy are recommended as the curative treatment for resectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Textbook outcomes in liver surgery (TOLS) is a novel composite measure that has been defined by expert consensus to represent the optimal postoperative course after hepatectomy. This study aimed to determine the incidence of TOLS and the independent predictors associated with TOLS after curative-intent resection in GBC patients. METHODS All consecutive GBC patients who underwent curative-intent resection between 2014 and 2020 were enrolled from a multicenter database from 11 hospitals as the training and the internal testing cohorts, and Southwest Hospital as the external testing cohort. TOLS was defined as no intraoperative grade greater than or equal to 2 incidents, no grade B/C postoperative bile leaks, no postoperative grade B/C liver failure, no 90-day postoperative major morbidity, no 90-day readmission, no 90-day mortality after hospital discharge, and R0 resection. Independent predictors of TOLS were identified using logistic regression and were used to construct the nomogram. The predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve and calibration curves. RESULTS TOLS was achieved in 168 patients (54.4%) and 74 patients (57.8%) from the training and internal testing cohorts, and the external testing cohort, respectively. On multivariate analyses, age less than or equal to 70 years, absence of preoperative jaundice (total bilirubin≤3 mg/dl), T1 stage, N0 stage, wedge hepatectomy, and no neoadjuvant therapy were independently associated with TOLS. The nomogram that incorporated these predictors demonstrated excellent calibration and good performance in both the training and external testing cohorts (area under the curve: 0.741 and 0.726). CONCLUSIONS TOLS was only achieved in approximately half of GBC patients treated with curative-intent resection, and the constructed nomogram predicted TOLS accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Peng Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Da-Long Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, China
| | - Wei-Yue Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
- Clinical Research Center of Oncology, Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University, Lishui, China
| | - Jiao-Yang Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Xue-Lei Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Ping Yue
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Lanzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Chao Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou, China
| | - Zhao-Ping Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jiujiang First People's Hospital, Jiujiang, China
| | - Rui Ding
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University (Air Force Medical University), Xi'an, China
| | - Yi Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Fan Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Jin-Xue Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Henan Provincial Tumor Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Dong Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xi 'an Jiaotong University Medical College First Affiliated Hospital, Xi 'an, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Yan Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Jie Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Jing-Jing Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Yan-Qi Zhang
- Department of Health Statistics, College of Military Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Hai-Su Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
- Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Zhi-Yu Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vega EA, Newhook TE, Mellado S, Ruzzenente A, Okuno M, De Bellis M, Panettieri E, Ahmad MU, Merlo I, Rojas J, De Rose AM, Nishino H, Sinnamon AJ, Donadon M, Hauger MS, Guevara OA, Munoz C, Denbo JW, Chun YS, Tran Cao HS, Sanchez Claria R, Tzeng CWD, De Aretxabala X, Vivanco M, Brudvik KW, Seo S, Pekolj J, Poultsides GA, Torzilli G, Giuliante F, Anaya DA, Guglielmi A, Vinuela E, Vauthey JN. Benchmarks and Geographic Differences in Gallbladder Cancer Surgery: An International Multicenter Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4904-4911. [PMID: 37149547 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13531-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-quality surgery plays a central role in the delivery of excellent oncologic care. Benchmark values indicate the best achievable results. We aimed to define benchmark values for gallbladder cancer (GBC) surgery across an international population. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study included consecutive patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent surgery during 2000-2021 at 13 centers, across seven countries and four continents. Patients operated on at high-volume centers without the need for vascular and/or bile duct reconstruction and without significant comorbidities were chosen as the benchmark group. RESULTS Of 906 patients who underwent curative-intent GBC surgery during the study period, 245 (27%) were included in the benchmark group. These were predominantly women (n = 174, 71%) and had a median age of 64 years (interquartile range 57-70 years). In the benchmark group, 50 patients (20%) experienced complications within 90 days after surgery, with 20 patients (8%) developing major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa). Median length of postoperative hospital stay was 6 days (interquartile range 4-8 days). Benchmark values included ≥ 4 lymph nodes retrieved, estimated intraoperative blood loss ≤ 350 mL, perioperative blood transfusion rate ≤ 13%, operative time ≤ 332 min, length of hospital stay ≤ 8 days, R1 margin rate ≤ 7%, complication rate ≤ 22%, and rate of grade ≥ IIIa complications ≤ 11%. CONCLUSIONS Surgery for GBC remains associated with significant morbidity. The availability of benchmark values may facilitate comparisons in future analyses among GBC patients, GBC surgical approaches, and centers performing GBC surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Tuft University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Masayuki Okuno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Panettieri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - M Usman Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ignacio Merlo
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jesus Rojas
- UGI & HPB Surgery Unit, Hospital Regional de Talca, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile
| | - Agostino M De Rose
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Hiroto Nishino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Andrew J Sinnamon
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marit S Hauger
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Oscar A Guevara
- Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Cesar Munoz
- UGI & HPB Surgery Unit, Hospital Regional de Talca, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile
| | - Jason W Denbo
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rodrigo Sanchez Claria
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xabier De Aretxabala
- Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Marcelo Vivanco
- Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Kristoffer W Brudvik
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Juan Pekolj
- General Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel A Anaya
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Eduardo Vinuela
- Gallbladder Consortium Chile, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Unit, Surgery Service, Sotero del Rio Hospital and Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vega EA, Mellado S, Salehi O, Freeman R, Conrad C. Treatment of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1413. [PMID: 35326566 PMCID: PMC8945892 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary tract cancer worldwide and its incidence has significant geographic variation. A unique combination of predisposing factors includes genetic predisposition, geographic distribution, female gender, chronic inflammation, and congenital developmental abnormalities. Today, incidental GBC is the most common presentation of resectable gallbladder cancer, and surgery (minimally invasive or open) remains the only curative treatment available. Encouragingly, there is an important emerging role for systemic treatment for patients who have R1 resection or present with stage III-IV. In this article, we describe the pathogenesis, surgical and systemic treatment, and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A. Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| | | | - Omid Salehi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| | - Richard Freeman
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA; (E.A.V.); (O.S.); (R.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
A Novel Prognostic Nomogram for Gallbladder Cancer after Surgical Resection: A Single-Center Experience. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2021; 2021:6619149. [PMID: 34447433 PMCID: PMC8383717 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6619149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Gallbladder cancer (GBC), which accounts for more than 80% of biliary tract malignancies, has a poor prognosis with an overall 5-year survival less than 10%. The study aimed to identify risk factors and develop a predictive model for GBC following surgical resection. Methods 98 GBC patients who underwent surgical resection from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled in the study. Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify significant prognostic factors. A nomogram was constructed and Harrell's concordance index, calibration plot, and decision cure analysis were used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the nomogram. Results Liver resection, tumor size, perineural invasion, surgical margin, and liver invasion were identified as independent risk factors for overall survival (OS) in GBC patients who underwent surgical resection. Based on the selected risk factors, a novel nomogram was constructed. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.777, which was higher than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (0.724) and Nevin staging system (0.659). Decision cure analysis revealed that the nomogram had a better net benefit and the calibration curves for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probabilities were also well matched with the actual survival rates. Lastly, high-risk GBC were stratified based on the scores of the nomogram and we found high-risk GBC were associated with both worse OS and disease-free survival (DFS). Conclusion We developed a nomogram showing a better predictive capacity for patients' survival of resected GBC than the AJCC staging systems. The established model may help to stratify high-risk GBC and facilitate decision-making in the clinic.
Collapse
|
10
|
Matsuyama R, Yabusita Y, Homma Y, Kumamoto T, Endo I. Essential updates 2019/2020: Surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:152-161. [PMID: 33860135 PMCID: PMC8034687 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer is a biliary tract cancer that originates in the gallbladder and cystic ducts and is recognized worldwide as a refractory cancer with early involvement of the surrounding area because of its anatomical characteristics. Although the number of cases is increasing steadily worldwide, the frequency of this disease remains low, making it difficult to plan large-scale clinical studies, and there is still much discussion about the indications for surgical resection and the introduction of multidisciplinary treatment. Articles published between 2019 and 2020 were reviewed, focusing mainly on the indications for surgical resection for each tumor stage, the treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer, and current trends in minimally invasive surgery for gallbladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryusei Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Yasuhiro Yabusita
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Yuki Homma
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Takafumi Kumamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Incidental Carcinoma after Cholecystectomy for Benign Disease of the Gallbladder: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9051484. [PMID: 32423156 PMCID: PMC7290945 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the incidence and the prognosis of incidental carcinoma of the gallbladder (IGBC) after cholecystectomy through a meta-analysis. This meta-analysis included 51 studies and 436,636 patients with cholecystectomy. The incidence rate of IGBC after cholecystectomy was 0.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5%-0.8%). The incidence rate of recent studies was not significantly different from those of past studies. The mean age and female ratio of the IGBC subgroup were not significantly different from those of the overall patient group. The estimated rates of IGBC were 13.0%, 34.1%, 39.7%, 22.7%, and 12.5% in the pTis, pT1, pT2, pT3, and pT4 stages, respectively. Patients with IGBC had a favorable overall survival rate compared to patients with non-IGBC (hazard ratio (HR) 0.574, 95% CI 0.445-0.739). However, there was no significant difference of disease-free survival between the IGBC and non-IGBC subgroups (HR 0.931, 95% CI 0.618-1.402). IGBC was found in 0.6% of patients with cholecystectomy. The prognosis of patients with IGBC was favorable compared to those with non-IGBC. In the pathologic examination after cholecystectomy for benign diseases, a sufficient examination for histology should be guaranteed to detect IGBC.
Collapse
|
12
|
Torén W, Ansari D, Søreide K, Andersson R. Re-resection for incidentally detected gallbladder cancer: Weighing in on the options. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 46:495-497. [PMID: 31669144 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- William Torén
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Daniel Ansari
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Roland Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|