1
|
Song C, Li W, Cui J, Miao Q, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Nie S, Zhou M, Chai R. Pre-operative prediction of histopathological growth patterns of colorectal cancer liver metastasis using MRI-based radiomic models. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:4239-4248. [PMID: 39069557 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04290-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) have prognostic value. However, the differentiation of HGPs relies on postoperative pathology. This study aimed to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic model to predict HGP pre-operatively, following the latest guidelines. METHODS This retrospective study included 93 chemotherapy-naïve patients with CRLMs who underwent contrast-enhanced liver MRI and a partial hepatectomy between 2014 and 2022. Radiomic features were extracted from the tumor zone (RTumor), a 2-mm outer ring (RT+2), a 2-mm inner ring (RT-2), and a combined ring (R2+2) on late arterial phase MRI images. Analysis of variance method (ANOVA) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms were used for feature selection. Logistic regression with five-fold cross-validation was used for model construction. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibrated curves, and decision curve analyses were used to assess model performance. DeLong tests were used to compare different models. RESULTS Twenty-nine desmoplastic and sixty-four non-desmoplastic CRLMs were included. The radiomic models achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.736, 0.906, 0.804, and 0.794 for RTumor, RT-2, RT+2, and R2+2, respectively, in the training cohorts. The AUC values were 0.713, 0.876, 0.785, and 0.777 for RTumor, RT-2, RT+2, and R2+2, respectively, in the validation cohort. RT-2 exhibited the best performance. CONCLUSION The MRI-based radiomic models could predict HGPs in CRLMs pre-operatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunlin Song
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Wenhui Li
- Institute of Cancer Research, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jingjing Cui
- Department of Research and Development, United Imaging Intelligence, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Miao
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zitian Zhang
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Siru Nie
- Department of Pathology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Meihong Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ruimei Chai
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang, 110001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geady C, Abbas-Aghababazadeh F, Kohan A, Schuetze S, Shultz D, Haibe-Kains B. Radiomic-based prediction of lesion-specific systemic treatment response in metastatic disease. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2024; 116:102413. [PMID: 38945043 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Despite sharing the same histologic classification, individual tumors in multi metastatic patients may present with different characteristics and varying sensitivities to anticancer therapies. In this study, we investigate the utility of radiomic biomarkers for prediction of lesion-specific treatment resistance in multi metastatic leiomyosarcoma patients. Using a dataset of n=202 lung metastases (LM) from n=80 patients with 1648 pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) radiomics features and LM progression determined from follow-up CT, we developed a radiomic model to predict the progression of each lesion. Repeat experiments assessed the relative predictive performance across LM volume groups. Lesion-specific radiomic models indicate up to a 4.5-fold increase in predictive capacity compared with a no-skill classifier, with an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.70 for the most precise model (FDR = 0.05). Precision varied by administered drug and LM volume. The effect of LM volume was controlled by removing radiomic features at a volume-correlation coefficient threshold of 0.20. Predicting lesion-specific responses using radiomic features represents a novel strategy by which to assess treatment response that acknowledges biological diversity within metastatic subclones, which could facilitate management strategies involving selective ablation of resistant clones in the setting of systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caryn Geady
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Andres Kohan
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Scott Schuetze
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - David Shultz
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Canada; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Benjamin Haibe-Kains
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Canada; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada; Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geady C, Abbas-Aghababazadeh F, Kohan A, Schuetze S, Shultz D, Haibe-Kains B. Radiomic-Based Prediction of Lesion-Specific Systemic Treatment Response in Metastatic Disease. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2023.09.22.23294942. [PMID: 37873411 PMCID: PMC10593058 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.22.23294942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Despite sharing the same histologic classification, individual tumors in multi metastatic patients may present with different characteristics and varying sensitivities to anticancer therapies. In this study, we investigate the utility of radiomic biomarkers for prediction of lesion-specific treatment resistance in multi metastatic leiomyosarcoma patients. Using a dataset of n=202 lung metastases (LM) from n=80 patients with 1648 pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) radiomics features and LM progression determined from follow-up CT, we developed a radiomic model to predict the progression of each lesion. Repeat experiments assessed the relative predictive performance across LM volume groups. Lesion-specific radiomic models indicate up to a 4.5-fold increase in predictive capacity compared with a no-skill classifier, with an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.70 for the most precise model (FDR = 0.05). Precision varied by administered drug and LM volume. The effect of LM volume was controlled by removing radiomic features at a volume-correlation coefficient threshold of 0.20. Predicting lesion-specific responses using radiomic features represents a novel strategy by which to assess treatment response that acknowledges biological diversity within metastatic subclones, which could facilitate management strategies involving selective ablation of resistant clones in the setting of systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caryn Geady
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Andres Kohan
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Scott Schuetze
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - David Shultz
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Benjamin Haibe-Kains
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Connell RM, Hoti E. Challenges and Opportunities for Precision Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2379. [PMID: 39001441 PMCID: PMC11240734 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing globally due to an interaction of environmental and genetic factors. A minority of patients with CRLM have surgically resectable disease, but for those who have resection as part of multimodal therapy for their disease, long-term survival has been shown. Precision surgery-the idea of careful patient selection and targeting of surgical intervention, such that treatments shown to be proven to benefit on a population level are the optimal treatment for each individual patient-is the new paradigm of care. Key to this is the understanding of tumour molecular biology and clinically relevant mutations, such as KRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability (MSI), which can predict poorer overall outcomes and a poorer response to systemic therapy. The emergence of immunotherapy and hepatic artery infusion (HAI) pumps show potential to convert previously unresectable disease to resectable disease, in addition to established systemic and locoregional therapies, but the surgeon must be wary of poor-quality livers and the spectre of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Volume modulation, a cornerstone of hepatic surgery for a generation, has been given a shot in the arm with the advent of liver venous depletion (LVD) ensuring significantly more hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). The optimal timing of liver resection for those patients with synchronous disease is yet to be truly established, but evidence would suggest that those patients requiring complex colorectal surgery and major liver resection are best served with a staged approach. In the operating room, parenchyma-preserving minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can dramatically reduce the surgical insult to the patient and lead to better perioperative outcomes, with quicker return to function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Michael O'Connell
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Radomski SN, Dunworth M, West JJ, Greer JB, Johnston FM, Ewald AJ. Intra- and Interpatient Drug Response Heterogeneity Exist in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Nongynecologic Cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1996-2007. [PMID: 38175427 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14696-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Select patients with peritoneal metastases are treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). We assayed for intra- and interpatient drug response heterogeneity through testing of patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs). METHODS PDTOs were generated from CRS/HIPEC patients from December 2021 to September 2022 and subjected to an in vitro HIPEC drug screen. Drug response was assessed with a cell viability assay and cleaved caspase-3 staining. RESULTS A total of 31 patients were consented for tissue collection. Viable tissue was harvested from 23, and PDTO generation was successful in 13 (56%). PDTOs were analyzed from six appendiceal, three colorectal, two small bowel, one gastric, and one adrenal tumor. Drug screen results were generated in as few as 7 days (62%), with an average time of 12 days. Most patients received mitomycin-C (MMC) intraoperatively (n = 9); however, in only three cases was this agent considered the optimal choice in vitro. Three sets of PDTOs were resistant (defined as > 50% PDTO viability) to all agents tested and two were pan-sensitive (defined as 3 or more agents with < 50% PDTO viability). In three patients, organoids were generated from multiple metastatic sites and intrapatient drug response heterogeneity was observed. CONCLUSIONS Both intra- and interpatient drug response heterogeneity exist in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for nongynecologic abdominal cancers. Caution must be used when interpreting patient response to chemotherapeutic agents based on a single site of testing in those with metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon N Radomski
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew Dunworth
- Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Junior J West
- Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan B Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew J Ewald
- Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Giovanis Institute for Translational Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Araujo RLC, Carvalho CGCY, Maeda CT, Milani JM, Bugano DG, de Moraes PHZ, Linhares MM. Oncologic aspects of the decision-making process for surgical approach for colorectal liver metastases progressing during chemotherapy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:877-886. [PMID: 36185562 PMCID: PMC9521463 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer represents the third most diagnosed malignancy in the world. The liver is the main site of metastatic disease, affected in 30% of patients with newly diagnosed disease. Complete resection is considered the only potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), with a 5-year survival rate ranging from 35% to 58%. However, up to 80% of patients have initially unresectable disease, due to extrahepatic disease or bilobar multiple liver nodules. The availability of increasingly effective systemic chemotherapy has contributed to converting patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to resectable disease, improving long-term outcomes, and accessing tumor biology. In recent years, response to preoperative systemic chemotherapy before liver resection has been established as a major prognostic factor. Some studies have demonstrated that patients with regression of hepatic metastases while on chemotherapy have improved outcomes when compared to patients with stabilization or progression of the disease. Even if disease progression during chemotherapy represents an independent negative prognostic factor, some patients may still benefit from surgery, given the role of this modality as the main treatment with curative intent for patients with CRLM. In selected cases, based on size, the number of lesions, and tumor markers, surgery may be offered despite the less favorable prognosis and as an option for non-chemo responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael L C Araujo
- Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital e Maternidade Brasil Rede D'Or São Luiz, Santo André 09030-590, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Camila G C Y Carvalho
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital e Maternidade Brasil Rede D'Or São Luiz, Santo André 09030-590, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carlos T Maeda
- Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil
| | - Jean Michel Milani
- Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil
| | - Diogo G Bugano
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, Brazil
| | | | - Marcelo M Linhares
- Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Strömberg C, Martinez de la Maza L, Fernández Moro C, Gerling M, Jorns C, Sparrelid E, Löhr J, Villard C. Prognostic impact of inter-metastatic heterogeneity of viable tumour cells in colorectal liver metastases. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:1656-1663. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
8
|
Wesdorp NJ, Bolhuis K, Roor J, van Waesberghe JHTM, van Dieren S, van Amerongen MJ, Chapelle T, Dejong CHC, Engelbrecht MRW, Gerhards MF, Grunhagen D, van Gulik TM, Hermans JJ, de Jong KP, Klaase JM, Liem MSL, van Lienden KP, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, Swijnenburg RJ, Punt CJA, Huiskens J, Kazemier G. The Prognostic Value of Total Tumor Volume Response Compared With RECIST1.1 in Patients With Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Systemic Treatment. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2021; 2:e103. [PMID: 37637880 PMCID: PMC10455281 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Compare total tumor volume (TTV) response after systemic treatment to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1) and assess the prognostic value of TTV change and RECIST1.1 for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with colorectal liver-only metastases (CRLM). Background RECIST1.1 provides unidimensional criteria to evaluate tumor response to systemic therapy. Those criteria are accepted worldwide but are limited by interobserver variability and ignore potentially valuable information about TTV. Methods Patients with initially unresectable CRLM receiving systemic treatment from the randomized, controlled CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included. TTV response was assessed using software specifically developed together with SAS analytics. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were used to calculate RECIST1.1 and TTV response to systemic therapy. Different thresholds (10%, 20%, 40%) were used to define response of TTV as no standard currently exists. RFS was assessed in a subgroup of patients with secondarily resectable CRLM after induction treatment. Results A total of 420 CT scans comprising 7820 CRLM in 210 patients were evaluated. In 30% to 50% (depending on chosen TTV threshold) of patients, discordance was observed between RECIST1.1 and TTV change. A TTV decrease of >40% was observed in 47 (22%) patients who had stable disease according to RECIST1.1. In 118 patients with secondarily resectable CRLM, RFS was shorter for patients with less than 10% TTV decrease compared with patients with more than 10% TTV decrease (P = 0.015), while RECIST1.1 was not prognostic (P = 0.821). Conclusions TTV response assessment shows prognostic potential in the evaluation of systemic therapy response in patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina J. Wesdorp
- From the Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karen Bolhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joran Roor
- Department of Health, SAS Institute B.V., Huizen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Hein T. M. van Waesberghe
- Department of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J. van Amerongen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cornelis H. C. Dejong
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc R. W. Engelbrecht
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael F. Gerhards
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Grunhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John J. Hermans
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Koert P. de Jong
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M. Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S. L. Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P. van Lienden
- Department of Interventional Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A. Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen M. Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M. Ruers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H. W. de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J. A. Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Huiskens
- Department of Health, SAS Institute B.V., Huizen, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- From the Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ryu WK, Kim JS, Park MH, Lee M, Kim HJ, Ryu JS, Lim JH. Heterogeneous radiological response to chemotherapy is associated with poor prognosis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 2021; 12:3333-3339. [PMID: 34693646 PMCID: PMC8671901 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A heterogeneous radiological response is frequently observed in cancer patients and could reflect tumor heterogeneity. We investigated the prognostic impact of heterogeneous radiological responses in patients with advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received platinum‐based chemotherapy. Methods The treatment response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria was evaluated in 212 patients with advanced NSCLC who received platinum‐based chemotherapy. Patients with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were classified into “PR homo,” “PR hetero,” “SD homo,” and “SD hetero” by the presence of a heterogeneous radiological response, and survival was compared between groups. We also compared survival based on the presence of metabolic responses in lesions with heterogeneous radiological responses. Results Fifty‐two patients (24.5%) were classified as PR, 112 patients (52.8%) as SD, and 48 patients (22.7%) as progressive disease (PD). There was no significant difference in progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the PR homo and PR hetero groups. The SD homo group had a longer PFS and OS than the SD hetero group. In the SD hetero group, patients with increased maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in lesions with heterogeneous radiological responses had a shorter PFS than those with a stable SUVmax. Conclusions The presence of lesions with radiological heterogeneity was associated with disease progression and poor prognosis in the SD group. Patients with heterogeneous radiological responses require careful monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Kyung Ryu
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Soo Kim
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi Hwa Park
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Minkyung Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Jung Kim
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Seon Ryu
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Hyeok Lim
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guo JC, Lin CY, Lin CC, Huang TC, Lien MY, Lu LC, Kuo HY, Hsu CH. Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma May Be Affected by Tumor Sites. Oncology 2021; 99:652-658. [PMID: 34340231 DOI: 10.1159/000517738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Heterogeneous tumor response has been reported in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study investigated whether the tumor site is associated with the response to ICIs in patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS Patients with ESCC who had measurable tumors in the liver, lung, or lymph node (LN) according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and received ICIs at 2 medical centers in Taiwan were enrolled. In addition to RECIST 1.1, tumor responses were determined per individual organ basis according to organ-specific criteria modified from RECIST 1.1. Fisher test or χ2 test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS In total, 37 patients were enrolled. The overall response rate per RECIST 1.1 was 13.5%. Measurable tumors in the LN, lung, and liver were observed in 26, 17, and 13 patients, respectively. The organ-specific response rates were 26.9%, 29.4%, and 15.4% for the LN, lung, and liver tumors, respectively (p = 0.05). The organ-specific disease control rates were 69.2%, 52.9%, and 21.1% for the LN, lung, and liver tumors, respectively (p = 0.024). Five (27.8%) among 18 patients harboring at least 2 involved organs had heterogeneous tumor response. CONCLUSION The response and disease control to ICIs may differ in ESCC tumors located at different metastatic sites, with a lesser likelihood of response and disease control in metastatic liver tumors than in tumors located at the LNs and lung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jhe-Cyuan Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan, .,Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, .,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan,
| | - Chen-Yuan Lin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chi Lin
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ta-Chen Huang
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Yu Lien
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Li-Chun Lu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Yang Kuo
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hung Hsu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gambaro K, Marques M, McNamara S, Couetoux du Tertre M, Diaz Z, Hoffert C, Srivastava A, Hébert S, Samson B, Lespérance B, Ko Y, Dalfen R, St‐Hilaire E, Sideris L, Couture F, Burkes R, Harb M, Camlioglu E, Gologan A, Pelsser V, Constantin A, Greenwood CM, Tejpar S, Kavan P, Kleinman CL, Batist G. Copy number and transcriptome alterations associated with metastatic lesion response to treatment in colorectal cancer. Clin Transl Med 2021; 11:e401. [PMID: 33931971 PMCID: PMC8087915 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapeutic resistance is the main cause of death in metastatic colorectal cancer. To investigate genomic plasticity, most specifically of metastatic lesions, associated with response to first-line systemic therapy, we collected longitudinal liver metastatic samples and characterized the copy number aberration (CNA) landscape and its effect on the transcriptome. METHODS Liver metastatic biopsies were collected prior to treatment (pre, n = 97) and when clinical imaging demonstrated therapeutic resistance (post, n = 43). CNAs were inferred from whole exome sequencing and were correlated with both the status of the lesion and overall patient progression-free survival (PFS). We used RNA sequencing data from the same sample set to validate aberrations as well as independent datasets to prioritize candidate genes. RESULTS We identified a significantly increased frequency gain of a unique CN, in liver metastatic lesions after first-line treatment, on chr18p11.32 harboring 10 genes, including TYMS, which has not been reported in primary tumors (GISTIC method and test of equal proportions, FDR-adjusted p = 0.0023). CNA lesion profiles exhibiting different treatment responses were compared and we detected focal genomic divergences in post-treatment resistant lesions but not in responder lesions (two-tailed Fisher's Exact test, unadjusted p ≤ 0.005). The importance of examining metastatic lesions is highlighted by the fact that 15 out of 18 independently validated CNA regions found to be associated with PFS in this study were only identified in the metastatic lesions and not in the primary tumors. CONCLUSION This investigation of genomic-phenotype associations in a large colorectal cancer liver metastases cohort identified novel molecular features associated with treatment response, supporting the clinical importance of collecting metastatic samples in a defined clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Gambaro
- Canadian National Centres of Excellence—Exactis Innovation5450 Cote‐des‐NeigesMontrealQuebecH3T 1Y6Canada
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Maud Marques
- Canadian National Centres of Excellence—Exactis Innovation5450 Cote‐des‐NeigesMontrealQuebecH3T 1Y6Canada
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Suzan McNamara
- Canadian National Centres of Excellence—Exactis Innovation5450 Cote‐des‐NeigesMontrealQuebecH3T 1Y6Canada
| | | | - Zuanel Diaz
- Canadian National Centres of Excellence—Exactis Innovation5450 Cote‐des‐NeigesMontrealQuebecH3T 1Y6Canada
| | - Cyrla Hoffert
- Canadian National Centres of Excellence—Exactis Innovation5450 Cote‐des‐NeigesMontrealQuebecH3T 1Y6Canada
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Archana Srivastava
- Canadian National Centres of Excellence—Exactis Innovation5450 Cote‐des‐NeigesMontrealQuebecH3T 1Y6Canada
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Steven Hébert
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Benoit Samson
- Charles LeMoyne Hospital3120 Taschereau Blvd.Greenfield ParkQuebecJ4V 2H1Canada
| | | | - Yoo‐Joung Ko
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre2075 Bayview Ave.TorontoOntarioM4N 3M5Canada
| | - Richard Dalfen
- St. Mary's Hospital3830 LacombeMontrealQuebecH3T 1M5Canada
| | - Eve St‐Hilaire
- Georges Dumont Hospital220 Avenue UniversiteMonctonNew BrunswickE1C 2Z3Canada
| | - Lucas Sideris
- Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont5415 Assumption BlvdMontrealQuebecH1T 2M4Canada
| | - Felix Couture
- Hôtel‐Dieu de Quebec11 Cote du PalaisMontrealQuebecG1R 2J6Canada
| | - Ronald Burkes
- Mount Sinai Hospital600 University AvenueTorontoOntarioM5G 1X5Canada
| | - Mohammed Harb
- Moncton Hospital135 Macbeath AveMonctonNew BrunswickE1C 6Z8Canada
| | - Errol Camlioglu
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Adrian Gologan
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Vincent Pelsser
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - André Constantin
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Celia M.T. Greenwood
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of OncologyMcGill University3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational HealthMcGill University3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology UnitKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenOude Markt 13Leuven3000Belgium
| | - Petr Kavan
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Claudia L. Kleinman
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
- Department of Human GeneticsLady Davis Research Institute, McGill University3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| | - Gerald Batist
- McGill University‐Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital3755 Côte Ste‐CatherineMontrealQuebecH3T 1E2Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Berg KCG, Brunsell TH, Sveen A, Alagaratnam S, Bjørnslett M, Hektoen M, Brudvik KW, Røsok BI, Bjørnbeth BA, Nesbakken A, Lothe RA. Genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among RAS/BRAF V600E /TP53 co-mutated resectable colorectal liver metastases. Mol Oncol 2021; 15:830-845. [PMID: 33325154 PMCID: PMC8024718 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatic resection is potentially curative for patients with colorectal liver metastases, but the treatment benefit varies. KRAS/NRAS (RAS)/TP53 co‐mutations are associated with a poor prognosis after resection, but there is large variation in patient outcome within the mutation groups, and genetic testing is currently not used to evaluate benefit from surgery. We have investigated the potential for improved prognostic stratification by combined biomarker analysis with DNA copy number aberrations (CNAs), and taking tumor heterogeneity into account. We determined the mutation status of RAS, BRAFV600, and TP53 in 441 liver lesions from 171 patients treated by partial hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. CNAs were profiled in 232 tumors from 67 of the patients. Mutations and high‐level amplifications of cancer‐critical genes, the latter including ERBB2 and EGFR, were predominantly homogeneous within patients. RAS/BRAFV600E and TP53 co‐mutations were associated with a poor patient outcome (hazard ratio, HR, 3.9, 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.3–11.1, P = 0.012) in multivariable analyses with clinicopathological variables. The genome‐wide CNA burden and intrapatient intermetastatic CNA heterogeneity varied within the mutation groups, and the CNA burden had prognostic associations in univariable analysis. Combined prognostic analyses of RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53 mutations and CNAs, either as a high CNA burden or high intermetastatic CNA heterogeneity, identified patients with a particularly poor outcome (co‐mutation/high CNA burden: HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2–5.9, P = 0.013; co‐mutation/high CNA heterogeneity: HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1–5.6, P = 0.022). In conclusion, DNA copy number profiling identified genomic and prognostic heterogeneity among patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases with co‐mutated RAS/BRAFV600E/TP53.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaja C G Berg
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Tuva H Brunsell
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Sharmini Alagaratnam
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Merete Bjørnslett
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Merete Hektoen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Kristoffer W Brudvik
- K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Bård I Røsok
- K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth
- K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,K.G.Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Division for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Giannini V, Rosati S, Defeudis A, Balestra G, Vassallo L, Cappello G, Mazzetti S, De Mattia C, Rizzetto F, Torresin A, Sartore-Bianchi A, Siena S, Vanzulli A, Leone F, Zagonel V, Marsoni S, Regge D. Radiomics predicts response of individual HER2-amplified colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients treated with HER2-targeted therapy. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:3215-3223. [PMID: 32875550 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The aim of our study was to develop and validate a machine learning algorithm to predict response of individual HER2-amplified colorectal cancer liver metastases (lmCRC) undergoing dual HER2-targeted therapy. Twenty-four radiomics features were extracted after 3D manual segmentation of 141 lmCRC on pretreatment portal CT scans of a cohort including 38 HER2-amplified patients; feature selection was then performed using genetic algorithms. lmCRC were classified as nonresponders (R-), if their largest diameter increased more than 10% at a CT scan performed after 3 months of treatment, responders (R+) otherwise. Sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values in correctly classifying individual lesion and overall patient response were assessed on a training dataset and then validated on a second dataset using a Gaussian naïve Bayesian classifier. Per-lesion sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV were 89%, 85%, 93%, 78% and 90%, 42%, 73%, 71% respectively in the testing and validation datasets. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 86%. Heterogeneous response was observed in 9 of 38 patients (24%). Five of nine patients were carriers of nonresponder lesions correctly classified as such by our radiomics signature, including four of seven harboring only one nonresponder lesion. The developed method has been proven effective in predicting behavior of individual metastases to targeted treatment in a cohort of HER2 amplified patients. The model accurately detects responder lesions and identifies nonresponder lesions in patients with heterogeneous response, potentially paving the way to multimodal treatment in selected patients. Further validation will be needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Giannini
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Samanta Rosati
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Arianna Defeudis
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriella Balestra
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Cappello
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Simone Mazzetti
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristina De Mattia
- Department of Medical Physics, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Rizzetto
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Torresin
- Department of Medical Physics, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Physics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siena
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Vanzulli
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Leone
- Medical Oncology, ASL Biella, Biella, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Vittorina Zagonel
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Silvia Marsoni
- Precision Oncology, IFOM-The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Regge
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bruun J, Kryeziu K, Eide PW, Moosavi SH, Eilertsen IA, Langerud J, Røsok B, Totland MZ, Brunsell TH, Pellinen T, Saarela J, Bergsland CH, Palmer HG, Brudvik KW, Guren T, Dienstmann R, Guren MG, Nesbakken A, Bjørnbeth BA, Sveen A, Lothe RA. Patient-Derived Organoids from Multiple Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Reveal Moderate Intra-patient Pharmacotranscriptomic Heterogeneity. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:4107-4119. [PMID: 32299813 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular tumor heterogeneity may have important implications for the efficacy of targeted therapies in metastatic cancers. Inter-metastatic heterogeneity of sensitivity to anticancer agents has not been well explored in colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We established a platform for ex vivo pharmacogenomic profiling of patient-derived organoids (PDO) from resected colorectal cancer liver metastases. Drug sensitivity testing (n = 40 clinically relevant agents) and gene expression profiling were performed on 39 metastases from 22 patients. RESULTS Three drug-response clusters were identified among the colorectal cancer metastases, based primarily on sensitivities to EGFR and/or MDM2 inhibition, and corresponding with RAS mutations and TP53 activity. Potentially effective therapies, including off-label use of drugs approved for other cancer types, could be nominated for eighteen patients (82%). Antimetabolites and targeted agents lacking a decisive genomic marker had stronger differential activity than most approved chemotherapies. We found limited intra-patient drug sensitivity heterogeneity between PDOs from multiple (2-5) liver metastases from each of ten patients. This was recapitulated at the gene expression level, with a highly proportional degree of transcriptomic and pharmacological variation. One PDO with a multi-drug resistance profile, including resistance to EGFR inhibition in a RAS-mutant background, showed sensitivity to MEK plus mTOR/AKT inhibition, corresponding with low-level PTEN expression. CONCLUSIONS Intra-patient inter-metastatic pharmacological heterogeneity was not pronounced and ex vivo drug screening may identify novel treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer. Variation in drug sensitivities was reflected at the transcriptomic level, suggesting potential to develop gene expression-based predictive signatures to guide experimental therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarle Bruun
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kushtrim Kryeziu
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter W Eide
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Seyed H Moosavi
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Ina A Eilertsen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonas Langerud
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård Røsok
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Max Z Totland
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tuva H Brunsell
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ullevål Hospital-Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Teijo Pellinen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jani Saarela
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Christian H Bergsland
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Hector G Palmer
- Stem Cells and Cancer Group, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Kristoffer W Brudvik
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tormod Guren
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rodrigo Dienstmann
- Stem Cells and Cancer Group, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marianne G Guren
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ullevål Hospital-Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Clinic for Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brunsell TH, Sveen A, Bjørnbeth BA, Røsok BI, Danielsen SA, Brudvik KW, Berg KCG, Johannessen B, Cengija V, Abildgaard A, Guren MG, Nesbakken A, Lothe RA. High Concordance and Negative Prognostic Impact of RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Mutations in Multiple Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 19:e26-e47. [PMID: 31982351 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence and clinical implications of genetic heterogeneity in patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases remain largely unknown. In a prospective series of patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases, the aim was to investigate the inter-metastatic and primary-to-metastatic heterogeneity of mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA and their prognostic impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed the mutation status among 372 liver metastases and 78 primary tumors from 106 patients by methods used in clinical routine testing, by Sanger sequencing, by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and/or by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. The 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Although Sanger sequencing indicated inter-metastatic mutation heterogeneity in 14 of 97 patients (14%), almost all cases were refuted by high-sensitive NGS. Also, heterogeneity among metastatic deposits was concluded only for PIK3CA in 2 patients. Similarly, primary-to-metastatic heterogeneity was indicated in 8 of 78 patients (10%) using Sanger sequencing but for only 2 patients after NGS, showing the emergence of 1 KRAS and 1 PIK3CA mutation in the metastatic lesions. KRAS mutations were present in 53 of 106 patients (50%) and were associated with poorer 3-year CSS after liver resection (37% vs. 61% for KRAS wild-type; P = .004). Poor prognostic associations were found also for the combination of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations compared with triple wild-type (P = .002). CONCLUSION Intra-patient mutation heterogeneity was virtually undetected, both between the primary tumor and the liver metastases and among the metastatic deposits. KRAS mutations separately, and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations combined, were associated with poor patient survival after partial liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuva Høst Brunsell
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård I Røsok
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stine Aske Danielsen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristoffer Watten Brudvik
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kaja C G Berg
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjarne Johannessen
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vanja Cengija
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Abildgaard
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A Lothe
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K. G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|